Skip to main content

Integrin alpha-2 and beta-1 expression increases through multiple generations of the EDW01 patient-derived xenograft model of breast cancer—insight into their role in epithelial mesenchymal transition in vivo gained from an in vitro model system

Abstract

Background

Breast cancers acquire aggressive capabilities via epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), in which various integrins/integrin-linked kinase signalling are upregulated.

Methods

We investigated this in two patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) developed from breast-to-bone metastases, and its functional significance in a breast cancer cell line system. ED03 and EDW01 PDXs were grown subcutaneously in immunocompromised SCID mice through 11 passages and 7 passages, respectively. Tumour tissue was assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) for oestrogen receptor (ER)-alpha, E-cadherin, vimentin, Twist1, beta-catenin, P120-RasGAP, CD44, CD24 and Ki67, and RT-qPCR of EMT-related factors (CDH1, VIM, CD44, CD24), integrins beta 1 (ITGB1), alpha 2 (ITGA2) and ILK. Integrin and ILK expression in epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced EMT of the PMC42-ET breast cancer cell line was assessed by RT-qPCR and Western blotting, as were the effects of their transient knockdown via small interfering RNA +/− EGF. Cell migration, changes in cell morphology and adhesion of siRNA-transfected PMC42-ET cells to various extracellular matrix (ECM) substrates was assessed.

Results

The ED03 (ER+/PR−/HER2−/lobular) and EDW01 (ER+/PR−/HER2−/ductal) PDXs were both classified as molecular subtype luminal A. ED03 xenografts exhibited mutated E-cadherin with minimal expression, but remained vimentin-negative across all passages. In EDW01, the hypoxic indicator gene CAIX and Twist1 were co-ordinately upregulated at passages 4–5, corresponding with a decrease in E-cadherin. At passages 6–7, VIM was upregulated along with ITGB1 and ITGA2, consistent with an increasing EMT. The ED03 PDX displayed minimal change over passages in mice, for all genes examined. ILK, ITGB1 and ITGA2 mRNAs were also increased in the EGF-induced EMT of PMC42-ET cells (in which CDH1 was downregulated) although siRNA against these targets revealed that this induction was not necessary for the observed EMT. However, their knockdown significantly reduced EMT-associated adhesion and Transwell migration.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that despite an increase in ITGA2 and ITGB1 gene expression in the EMT exhibited by EDW01 PDX over multiple generations, this pathway may not necessarily drive the EMT process.

Introduction

Human breast cancer cell lines have been used extensively in vitro and in mice to dissect the cellular mechanisms associated with tumour aggressiveness and metastasis. However, cell line xenografts typically fail to recapitulate tumour cell heterogeneity. By contrast, human breast tumours engrafted into mice as patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) generally show excellent reproducibility of morphological and genetic characteristics of the original tumour with minimal genetic drift and as such are clinically relevant platforms for preclinical studies [1,2,3,4,5].

Aggressive cancers are known to display epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity (EMP), through which they can fluctuate between epithelial or mesenchymal states (or degrees of these) to assist survival in changing microenvironmental conditions [6,7,8]. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) describes a phenotypic change toward a more mesenchymal state resulting in more motile and invasive cancer cells. EMT has been shown to promote progression in several cancer types including breast [9, 10], contributes to chemoresistance [11, 12], and is prominent in circulating tumour cells (CTCs) [7, 13,14,15]. Evidence for EMP has been demonstrated in numerous human breast cancer cell line studies and increasingly in breast cancer in vivo models [16,17,18,19] and clinical material (reviewed in [20]).

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (also known as invasive carcinoma of no special type (IC NST)) have distinctive morphological features [21]. ILC is typified by single-file epithelial tumour cells, a finer stromal infiltration and often a minimal sclerotic tissue reaction—the combination of which makes self-detection and screen-detection (mammography) more difficult than for the typically more palpable IDC tumours, which grow as masses of epithelial cells within a desmoplastic stroma. These patterns are intimately linked to E-cadherin: ILCs do not express CDH1 due to the presence of inactivating mutations [22, 23] or silencing via methylation [24], or copy loss [25], and hence grow as individual and linear arrays of tumour cells. By contrast, IDCs typically express CDH1 and hence grow as cohesive tumour nests [21].

A major initiating event in the transcriptional programming of EMT is E-cadherin repression [26,27,28]. IDC expression of CDH1 is downregulated when they undergo an EMT, which is associated with increased invasiveness [29, 30]; thus for the purposes of this study, IDC could be considered as “EMT-positive”. Interestingly, EMT does not occur spontaneously in ILC cells [31] and they tend to show less vimentin expression than IDC [32]; thus, ILC could be considered EMT-negative”. Similarly, not all IDC-derived cell lines undergo EMT upon CDH1 silencing, while some do [18].

Integrin switching is prominent in breast cancer EMT and has been linked to tumour aggressiveness [33], and integrins have been shown to play important roles in tumour cell transmigration via EMT (reviewed in [34]). Integrins are a large family of heterodimeric cell surface receptors that play a prominent role in the adhesive interactions between cells and their surrounding extra-cellular matrix (ECM), providing adhesion for stationary cells, as well as traction during cell movement [35,36,37,38]. TGFβ-induced EMT in NMuMG mouse mammary cancer cells results in the downregulation of epithelial ITGA6/B4 expression (which mediates contact with the basement membrane) through epigenetically silencing of the gene encoding integrin β4 [39]. ITGA3/B1, which binds laminin and also associates with E-cadherin, is required for progression through EMT in lung alveolar epithelial cells, where it integrates beta-catenin and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)–SMAD signalling to promote myofibroblast formation and lung fibrosis [40]. Interactions between ITGA5/B1 integrin and fibronectin have been associated with EMT in EpH4 mouse normal mammary epithelial cells and human lung cancer cell lines [41, 42]. In pancreatic carcinoma cells, increased expression of ITGA1/B1 or ITGA2/B1 integrins and their interactions with type I collagen facilitate the disruption of E-cadherin complexes and the nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and promote proliferation and motility [43].

Indeed, ITGA2/B1 is widely expressed on epithelial cells and its levels are increased in several carcinoma cells from the epithelial origin [44]. Growing evidence indicates that ITGA2/B1 can be a key pathway in cancer pathogenesis [43, 45, 46]. Furthermore, Chen et al. showed that increased expression of ITGA2/B1 is positively correlated with increased metastatic ability in human squamous cell lung cancer cells when i.v. inoculated in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice [47].

It has been demonstrated that ILK can induce a complete EMT in various epithelial cell lines and thus be involved in the initiation of EMT in vivo, and the maintenance of the mesenchymal phenotype and disease progression [48,49,50,51]. ILK can modulate the expression of not only E-cadherin, but also other epithelial markers such as CK18 [52] and MUC1 [53], as well as mesenchymal markers such as LEF1 [54] and vimentin [53, 54]. Therefore, ILK is able to initiate an EMT. Gain and loss of function strategies have shown that over-expression, and/or constitutive activation of ILK results in oncogenic transformation and progression to invasive and metastatic phenotypes [55].

In the current study, the divergent cancer subtypes of ILC and IDC, which differ in regard to their EMT status, were studied as PDXs in order to examine the relationship between EMT, ITGA2/B1 and ILK in cancer progression, through serial passages in mice. The human tumoural material for both PDXs were obtained from bone metastases and thus may have already undergone cycles of EMT, and its reversal MET, to enable colonisation [26].

We coupled this with an investigation into the pattern of ILK and integrin expression changes in PMC42-ET human breast cancer cells induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF) treatment to undergo an EMT in vitro, and assessed whether these integrin changes were necessary for EMT to occur.

Materials and methods

Patient material and creation of xenografts

Establishment of the PDXs used in this study was described previously [56].

The ED03 xenograft was derived from a lobular breast cancer bone metastasis in a 40-year-old woman, 3.5 yrs. after initial diagnosis of her primary tumour. The EDW01 PDX was derived from a bone metastasis of an invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast presenting as clinically overt macrometastatic deposits in a 44-year-old woman.

Briefly, the tumour tissue derived initially from the bone metastasis deposits was diced into ~ 1 mm pieces, mixed with Matrigel® (BD Biosciences, Australia) and implanted bilaterally subcutaneously in SCID mice (ARC, Perth, Australia). For each passage, once tumour volumes reached 2000 mm3, mice were euthanised, and the tumours were removed. The tumour tissue was again chopped into chunks, mixed with Matrigel®, and implanted into fresh mice. This was repeated 6 times for EDW01 (total of 7 passages) and 10 times for ED03 (total of 11 passages). Portions were snap frozen for RNA extraction and formalin fixed and paraffin embedded for immunohistochemical analyses at each passage.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

A tissue microarray was created of randomised duplicate 2-mm diameter cores of tumour blocks corresponding to various passage numbers through mice of the ED03 and EDW01 PDX model systems. IHC was performed using the Ventana Discovery Ultra Automated Slide Preparation system. Details of antibodies used in this study can be found in Table 1. The membrane-associated proteins (E-cadherin, beta-catenin, P120-RasGAP, CD24, CD44, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)) were scored as cytoplasmic or membranous, and whether they were heterogeneous or homogeneous in these areas. Vimentin staining was scored as positive if present in the cytoplasm of cells, whereas for Twist1 and Ki67, the proportion of positive nuclei was recorded.

Table 1 Antibodies used in this study

Quantification of IHC data shown in Supplementary Figures 2 and 4 was determined using ImageJ, where DAB brown-positive nuclei were separated from blue (total) nuclei, and using the colour threshold tool, a threshold applied to only select positive nuclei that was visible by eye. Using this threshold, the area taken up by positive nuclei was quantified. The ratio of “relative intensity per cell” was obtained by dividing the overall area of positivity for the IHC target (either pink or brown) by overall nuclear area.

Reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR

RNA was extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Mini prep Kit (Qiagen, Doncaster, VIC, Australia). cDNA synthesis and reverse transcriptase-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were performed as previously described, using a specific reverse transcriptase (RT) primer in the cDNA synthesis step [57, 58]. Expression levels indicated by raw cycle thresholds (CTs) of the genes of interest were subtracted from the raw CT of the ribosomal protein L32 (RPL32) mRNA and plotted as dCT. RPL32 CT values were observed to be unchanged by passage number in mice or PDX. Human-specific primers for various genes examined in this study are detailed in Table 2.

Table 2 QPCR primers for various genes examined in this study

siRNA-mediated knockdown

Small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown of ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK (Horizon, [formerly Dharmacon], Melbourne, Australia) was performed in PMC42-ET cells. These cells display a molecular phenotype of Basal B (E Tomaskovic-Crook and T Blick, unpublished observation), based on clustering of a limited number of the Basal B discriminator genes [19] showing reliable data in an Affymetrix U133A analysis kindly performed by the laboratory of Joe Gray, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California [59]. These IDC-derived cells express E-cadherin mRNA and protein but do not assemble it at the cell membrane [27]. PMC42-ET were grown in RPMI with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Australia) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

The siRNA target sequences for ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK are presented in Table 3. A commercial non-targeting control sequence (control siRNA) was also used (siSTABLE Non-targeting siRNA #1, Horizon, [formerly Dharmacon], Melbourne, Australia). Briefly, PMC42-ET cells were transfected using DharmaFECT4 (Horizon, [formerly Dharmacon], Melbourne, Australia) and 100 nM siRNA targeting ITGB1, ITGA2, ILK or control siRNA. The transfection efficiency of the siRNA was inferred by the level of protein knockdown that was achieved, determined by Western blot. Specificity of the siRNA knockdown of ITGB1, ITGA2 or ILK was ascertained by the lack of effects seen with a control siRNA, or against the other targets studied. After 8 h, cells were then left either unstimulated or stimulated with 10 ng/ml EGF for 72 h. Controls included cells alone (no transfection), transfection reagent alone and the control siRNA. Protein and RNA were extracted 72 h post EGF-stimulation and analysed by Western immunoblotting and RT-qPCR, respectively. Recombinant EGF was purchased from BD Biosciences, (Bedford, MA, USA).

Table 3 Sequences of siRNA used in the current study

Western blotting

Western blotting for ITGB1, ITGA2, ILK, pan-actin, Vimentin, N-cadherin and E-cadherin in siRNA transfected PMC42-ET cells +/− EGF was performed as previously described [57], with protein extracted using RIPA (radioimmunoprecipitation assay) buffer containing protease inhibitors. The RIPA-soluble fraction (supernatant after centrifugation) was analysed in all Western blots, with the insoluble pellet discarded. In regard to the contents of this RIPA buffer, 1.58 g Tris base and 1.8 g sodium chloride was dissolved in 150 ml of dH20 and the pH adjusted to 7.4 with HCl. Twenty millilitres of 10% NP40 (Igepal) and 5 ml of 10% Na-deoxycholate (deoxycholic acid) was added and stirred until the mixture was clear. To this, 2 ml of 100 mM EDTA was added and the total volume adjusted to 200 mL with dH20. One protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche) was added to 10 mL RIPA immediately prior to use. Antibodies and their dilutions used for Western blotting are detailed in Table 1.

Cell matrix adhesion assay

Wells of 24-well plates (polystyrene, non-tissue culture treated; Nunc Inc., Naperville, IL) were coated with 100 μg/ml collagen-I, 100 μg/ml collagen-IV, 20 μg/ml fibronectin or 50 μg/ml laminin. Collagen 1, collagen IV, laminin (from Engelbreth-Holm Swarm murine sarcoma) and fibronectin (from bovine plasma) used in these assays were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Proteins were allowed to bind to the cells overnight at room temperature under the laminar flow hood, before the wells were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and non-specific interactions were blocked for 1 h at 37 °C with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, pH 7.4. PMC42-ET cells were transfected with siRNA. Eight hours later, cells were left either unstimulated or stimulated with EGF for 72 h, after which the cells were detached using 0.25% trypsin and allowed to attach to the various (ECM substrate-coated plates for 1 h. Cells attached to ECM was estimated by the average of cell counts from five random high-power fields under light microscopy (counted in situ on the substrate after washing).

Monolayer wound healing assay

This was performed as previously described [57]. Briefly, PMC42-ET cells were plated in a 6-well plate set up in triplicate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to allow the formation of a confluent monolayer. The cells were then wounded by using a P200 pipette tip. The wounded monolayers were washed with complete media to remove detached cells. Images of the wounds were taken at 0, 24 and 48 h. Wound areas at each time point were analysed and quantitated using ImageJ software.

Boyden chamber migration assay

Boyden chamber migration assays were performed as previously described [60]. Briefly, transmigration culture assays were performed using 8-μm pore Transwell chambers (Corning, USA). Polycarbonate membranes (8-μm pore size) of the upper compartment of 24-well chambers were coated with 100 μg/ml collagen I in serum-free media (SFM; Roswell Park Memorial Institute [RPMI]-1640 medium). siRNA-transduced PMC42-ET cells (+/− EGF) harvested by trypsinisation were re-suspended in SFM supplemented with 0.2% BSA, and the cell suspension (2.5 × 105 cells suspended in 250 μl SFM) was applied to the upper compartment in triplicate wells. The lower compartment was filled with 650 μl of chemoattractant (RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS [Sigma-Aldrich]). After 24 h of incubation, the chambers were rinsed in PBS to eliminate non-adherent cells and the remaining non-migrated cells on the upper surface of the filter were removed carefully with a cotton swab. Migrated cells on the lower side of the filter were stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sigma Aldrich, Australia) for 15 min. The crystal violet dye retained on the filters after washing was extracted with 10% acetic acid and cell migration was measured by reading the absorbance at 560 nm on a micro-titre plate reader (PolarStar Optima, BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany).

For use of the ILK inhibitor QLT0267 in Boyden Chambers, sub-confluent monolayers of the PMC42-ET cells were left either untreated or treated for 24 h with this inhibitor (QLT, Inc., Vancouver, Canada) at a final concentration of 6.25 μM prior to assay. Invasion of PMC42-ET cells in vitro was assessed by the invasion of the cells through Collagen-I-coated Transwell inserts. The inhibitor was dissolved in DMSO (0.1%), which was used as the vehicle control.

Statistical analyses

Gene expression data across PDX passages were analysed using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric) and Pearson’s correlation co-efficient, and the IHC intensity changes across PDX passages were analysed using Ordinary One-Way ANOVA. Cell matrix adhesion and Boyden chamber migration assay results were analysed using two-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v7 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).

Results

Histological comparison of the ED03 and EDW01 xenografts with increasing passages through mice

The ED03 PDXs was serially passaged up to passage (p) 11, whereas the EDW01 PDX was passaged up to p7. Histologically, the ED03 xenografts displayed a diffuse growth pattern with minimal visible tumour stroma, often growing in long cords of cells, consistent of ILC. By contrast, EDW01 PDX revealed histology consistent with IDC, with clearly visible stromal septae separating growing tumour islands (Fig. 1). In ED03, the stromal collagen was evident only under higher magnification as it was finer and more pericellular compared with EDW01, in which the thicker stromal cords separated lobules of tumour. This stroma was of murine origin, as it did not stain with human-specific vimentin antibody (Fig. 1). Abundance of stromal area observed for EDW01 shown in here in Fig. 1 did not visibly increase with subsequent passaging in mice (Supplementary Fig. 1). Tumoural cores examined were generally representative of histology observed in the donor blocks from which the tissue microarray was assembled (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Masson’s trichrome and E-cadherin (E-cad)/vimentin (vim) immunohistochemistry performed on serial section from ED03 (LHS; passage 1 (p1)), and EDW01 (RHS; passage 4 (p4)) PDX models. Boxed areas shown as higher magnification images displayed below images of whole cores. Scale bar upper panels, 200 μm; lower panels 20 μm. H&E stained sections from donor blocks from which cores were derived can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2

Assessment of oestrogen receptor (ERα) across serial passages

We investigated the expression of ERα in the ED03 and EDW01 PDX models. As shown in Fig. 2 (low power in part A, higher power shown in part B), immuno-reactivity to ERα in the ED03 PDX was approximately 99% tumour cells, and this level of staining was maintained until p7, where ERα was found to be low in some of the TMA cores. The EDW01 PDX also displayed almost 100% positivity for ERα at p3; however, this progressively declined to approximately 40% in passages 6 and 7. These relative changes are plotted in Fig. 2c. Progesterone receptor (PR) expression was negative in ED03 in all passages and was weak (< 15%) in EDW01 at p3, disappearing by p4. HER-2 in both PDXs was negative (data not shown). The clinical approximated subtypes of breast cancer (defined according to the 2011 St Gallen International Breast Cancer Conference) classify both ED03 and EDW01 as Luminal A, since Ki67 is less than 14% in both PDXs (Fig. 3) [61].

Fig. 2
figure2

Immunohistochemical analysis (brown) of ED03 and EDW01 PDXs at various passages in mice for oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and progesterone receptor (PR). Nuclei counterstained with haematoxylin. a 4× magnification, scale bar, 200 μm. b 10× magnification, scale bar, 50 μM. c Plot of average % positivity per core for each PDX per passage number. ED03: p3; n = 2, p4; n = 4, p5; n = 4, p6; n = 2, p7; n = 4. EDW01: p3; n = 8, p4; n = 10, p4: n = 8, p5; n = 7, p6; n = 3, p7; n = 3. H&E stained sections from a subset of donor blocks from which cores were derived can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2

Fig. 3
figure3

Epithelial and mesenchymal marker analysis of the ED03 & EDW01 PDX tumours over serial passages (ED03 early: passage 3, mid: passage 7, late: passage 11; EDW01 early: passage 3, mid: passage 5, late: passage 7). Nuclei counterstained with haematoxylin. NEG: negative control (concentration and isotype matched IgG substituted for primary antibody) Arrows indicate Twist1-positive nuclei. 10× magnification, scale bar, 50 μm. Row 2 selected higher magnification areas: scale bar, 20 μm. H&E stained sections from a subset of donor blocks from which cores were derived can be found in Supplementary Fig. 2

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and RT-qPCR quantification of EMT markers

To assess any changes in EMT status over sequential passaging, key effector molecules implicated in the EMT process (vimentin/E-cadherin, Twist1, beta-catenin, P120-RasGTPase activating protein [P120-RasGAP], CD24/CD44) and the proliferative marker Ki67 were screened in the ED03 and EDW01 PDX models across the series of passages using IHC (Fig. 3) and human-specific RT-qPCR (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure4

Gene expression (RT-qPCR) for the ED03 and EDW01 PDX models. Mean of individual xenograft tumours are shown, where n ≥ 3 error bars are shown (standard error of the mean). For ED03: p3 n = 1, p5 n = 1, p7 n = 2, p8 n = 1, p9 n = 3, p10 n = 3, p = 11 n = 3. For EDW01: VIM/CDH1 and for ITGAB1/A2/ILK: p3 n = 6, p4 n = 11, p5 n = 6, p6 n = 11, p7 n = 3; for CD24/CD44 and murine Itgb1, all passages were n = 3. dCT in the figure represents delta CT, or change in CT values calculated by subtracting the raw CT of the gene of interest from the raw CT of the housekeeping gene RPL32. Statistical significance was calculated using two-tailed Mann-Whitney test (Non-parametric). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

E-cadherin immunostaining was almost completely absent in ED03 original patient material, consistent with its lobular carcinoma derivation [23]. We subsequently confirmed a putative somatic missense variant (p.His128Asn, data not shown). Consistent with this, less than 1% of cells expressed E-cadherin in any ED03 PDX passage in mice (Fig. 3, top left panel). This was reflected in a relative E-cadherin staining intensity index per cell score of the range 0–0.2 compared with 0.2–0.9 for EDW01 (Supplementary Fig. 3). Similarly, beta-catenin was not detectable within the ED03 PDXs; p120-RasGAP was aberrant, with staining observed to be mostly cytoplasmic. By contrast, EDW01 PDXs displayed strong E-cadherin immunostaining (Fig. 3, top right panel) and readily detectable RNA levels (Fig. 4). However, this was accompanied by a progressive increase in human-specific VIM mRNA expression with each passage (Fig. 4): passage 6 material displayed a significant increase (p = 0.008), and passage 7 material also displayed significant increase (p = 0.024) in comparison to passage 3 material. This was consistent with a significant (p > 0.05) increase in vimentin protein intensity per cell index across the passages for EDW01, derived from IHC (Supplementary Fig. 3). E-cadherin-positive tumour cells transitioning to vimentin positivity (possibly remaining E-cadherin positive, see high magnification inset, Fig. 3) were observed in EDW01 PDXs whereas VIM mRNA and protein in ED03 were almost negligible (Figs. 3 and 4 Supplementary Fig. 3).

As shown in Fig. 3, positive nuclear Twist1 expression was seen only in EDW01 xenograft tumours, adjacent to regions of necrosis (as indicated by black arrows); however, nuclear Twist1 positivity did not increase in abundance across the passages (Supplementary Fig. 3). Beta-catenin and P120-RasGAP was also mainly observed in EDW01 at the cell membrane and corresponded with E-cadherin staining.

We went on to further examine the expression of breast cancer stem cell markers CD44 and CD24, as upregulation of CD44 and downregulation of CD24 is observed in breast cancer cell line EMT [19]. ED03 displayed a homogeneous CD44 IHC pattern, which was relatively consistent throughout the passages at the protein and mRNA level (Figs. 3 and 4, Supplementary Fig. 45). By contrast, CD44 protein was heterogeneously expressed in EDW01. EDW01 exhibited higher mRNA abundance overall than ED03 (Fig. 4), consistent with the appearance (Fig. 3) and quantification of protein abundance by IHC where the increase in CD24 was found to be significant with increasing passage number (Supplementary Fig. 5). Within EDW01, but not ED03, there were regions of tumour cells that appeared to lack both CD24 and CD44 (Fig. 3); however, these regions in EDW01 that are negative for CD44/CD24 do not increase over passage number (Supplementary Fig. 4).

A parallel study of integrin expression in the PMC42-ET breast cancer cell line induced to undergo EMT with EGF indicated that ITGA2 and ITGB1, and their downstream regulator ILK, appeared to be upregulated (Supplementary Fig. 6). Hence ILK and these integrins were examined further in the PDX models. Increases in ITGA2 (p7 significantly higher than p3) and ITGB1 (p6 significantly higher than p3) were observed in ED03 xenograft material, which were maintained (Fig. 4). However, similar to the increased vimentin seen with each passage in EDW01, the levels of human ITGB1 mRNA in the xenografts increased with successive passage, demonstrating significantly higher expression (p = 0.026) at passage 6 in comparison to passage 3 (Fig. 4). Furthermore, ITGA2 mRNA expression in EDW01 xenografts (Fig. 4) was significantly upregulated at passage 7 material when compared to passage 3 (p = 0.024). ILK is activated by integrins including ΙΤΓΑ2/Β1 and mediates a number of signalling responses in relation to survival and proliferation in addition to induction of EMT [62]. A trend was observed toward upregulation of ILK mRNA expression in both ED03 and EDW01 xenografts (Fig. 4). Murine (stromal) Itgb1 displayed a similar pattern of upregulation as human (tumoural) ITGβ1 (Fig. 4).

These findings suggest that with serial passage EDW01 has accrued features consistent with EMT. The co-induction of the mRNA levels of ITGB1 and ITGA2 in EDW01 indicates that they may be important for the EMT process and/or phenotype, because they track with the indices of EMT (decreased E-cadherin and increased vimentin) observed in this model system.

Further investigation of EMT drivers and markers in the EDW01 xenograft model

Hypoxia is a common driver of EMT in breast cancer, and E-cadherin repressor genes have been implicated in this process [63]. We sought to examine the pattern of SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1 and ZEB1/2 expression through the serial passages in mice in the ED03 and EDW01 xenograft models, in comparison to the hypoxic indicator gene carbonic anhydrase 9 (CAIX).

As shown in Fig. 5, of the E-cadherin repressor genes examined (SNAI1, SNAI2, TWIST1 and ZEB1/2), TWIST1 was more highly expressed in the EDW01 xenograft compared with ED03 (Fig. 5a, (i)). ZEB1 and ZEB2 were not expressed at detectable levels in either PDX. Both TWIST1 and CAIX appeared to exhibit a similar expression pattern across the passages in the EDW01 PDX (Fig. 5a, (ii)). Pearson correlation analyses of this data (shown in Fig. 5b, (i)) indicated that this relationship was significant (R2 = 0.81, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the pattern of membrane intensity of CAIX (Fig. 5c), where we observed CAIX to be increase at p4 then drop at p6 in the EDW01 PDX, appeared to align with the CAIX (and TWIST1) gene expression data (shown in Fig. 5a, (ii)). This suggests that Twist1 may be somewhat functionally involved in the hypoxia-induced EMT through consecutive passages of the EDW01 PDX; however, further investigation is needed.

Fig. 5
figure5

a Quantitative, real-time RT-PCR gene expression of various E-cadherin transcriptional repressor genes (TWIST1, SNAI1, SNAI2) and correlation with expression of the hypoxic indicator gene Carbonic Anhydrase 9 (CAIX) in RNA extracted from tumours in the ED03 and EDW01 PDX models across serial passages. Mean expression values shown, error bars are standard error from the mean; mRNA from 3 xenografts per passage was analysed. dCT in the figure represents delta CT, or change in CT values calculated by subtracting the raw CT of the gene of interest from the raw CT of the housekeeping gene RPL32. b (i) Pearson correlation statistics of data shown in a. Pearson’s correlation statistics of ITGB1 and ITGA2 correlated with (ii) CD24 or (iii) CD44 in the PDX models. c Carbonic Anhydrase 9 immunohistochemisty in the ED03 and EDW01 PDX models with passage (p) numbers shown in the vertical plane. Images shown are representative of the following numbers of xenografts within their respective PDX passage numbers: ED03—p3: 6; p7: 7; p9: 1; p10: 1, p11: 1; EDW01—p3: 8; p4: 13; p5: 8; p6: 7; p7: 3. p value shown is two-tailed, and p < 0.05 defined as statistically significant and shaded grey in b. Scale bar, 50 μm

CD24 is an epithelial-associated marker with relevance to breast cancer stem cells, where its expression is reduced in comparison to luminal breast cancer cells [19]; its expression has been shown to indirectly stimulate cell adhesion to fibronectin, collagens I and IV and laminin through the activation of integrin activity [64]. Interestingly, the expression pattern of CD24 with ITGB1 was significantly positively correlated in the ED03 series (R2 = 0.9, p = 0.0012) and in the EDW01 series (R2 = 0.96, p = 0.023). CD24 was also positively correlated with ITGA2 in the ED03 series (R2 = 0.84, p = 0.0035) and this reached near significance in the EDW01 series (R2 = 0.76, p = 0.054) (Fig. 6c). No significant or near significant correlations were observed for CD44 with integrins in either PDX systems (Fig. 5b, (iii)).

Fig. 6
figure6

a Western blots showing ITGB1 (130 kDa), ITGA2 (160 kDa) and ILK (50 kDa) versus pan-actin (ACTN, 45 kDa) protein expression of siRNA transfected PMC42-ET cells; siRNA knockdown did not affect EMT of PMC42-ET cells in response to 10 ng/ml EGF treatment (+EGF) after 72 h as shown by b. western blotting for vimentin, (53 kDa), NCAD (100 kDa) and E-cadherin (120 kDa); numbers shown below the Western blots in a and b represent respective protein expression after normalisation to pan actin, relative to cells treated with control siRNA; TF: Transfection. c Phase contrast cellular morphology of cells from which protein was extracted for Western blots shown in b. Scale bar, 100 μm. The results of experiments shown are representative of three independent experiments

Functional assessment of candidate genes ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK in the PMC42-ET system

As expression of the ITGA2/B1 components were associated with the EMT observed in EDW01 xenografts over serial passages through mice, we tested whether they could be a “driver” of the EMT, using the PMC42-ET EMT model system.

Although already somewhat mesenchymal [27], PMC42-ET cells treated with EGF in vitro undergo a further EMT in which ILK, ITGB1 and ITGA2 are upregulated (supplementary Fig. 4), [63]. We examined the effects of siRNA knockdown of ITGA2, ITGB1 and ILK on late-stage mesenchymal gene expression, cell adhesion and cell migration.

As shown in Fig. 6a, individual siRNA knockdown of ITGB1, ITGA2 or ILK resulted in the expected reduction of expression of the target genes. In addition, ILK inhibition also led to the reduction of ITGB1 protein levels by 80% (0.2 in Fig. 6a); inhibition of ITGB1 also led to reduced ITGA2 protein expression (0.06 in Fig. 6a); and ILK inhibition led to a reduction in ITGA2 protein expression by 60% (0.41 in Fig. 6a). Inhibition of ITGB1 and ITGA2 by siRNA did not affect ILK protein levels. These data indicate a complex interplay between these three components.

We observed a greater dynamic range in the induction of vimentin with EGF after 72-h treatment in Supplementary Fig. 6C compared to Fig. 6B. This may be ascribed to differing behaviours of cells in culture over time and according to confluency when passaging but also differing gel/film exposure times between the two experiments. Despite the observable difference in regard to vimentin, one can deduce a clear and somewhat comparable downregulation of E-cadherin in both experiments.

To determine whether the cells with suppressed ITGB1, ITGA2 or ILK were able to undergo EMT with EGF treatments, cellular morphology and protein expression was examined. After 72 h of EGF treatment, cellular morphology (Fig. 6c) revealed a clear acquisition of spindle-shapes and breaking apart of cellular islands, consistent with an EMT. Protein expression of the “classical” indicators of EMT, vimentin, E-cadherin and N-cadherin were measured by Western immunoblotting (Fig. 6b). E-cadherin was dramatically reduced in the “cells alone” treated with EGF compared to the untreated “cells alone” control, whereas slight increases in vimentin and N-cadherin were observed in these untransfected cells, consistent with EGF-induced EMT of these cells as previously reported [27, 63].

No observable differences in the responses of vimentin, N-cadherin or E-cadherin protein levels to 72 h of EGF treatment were seen following treatment with ITGB1, ITGA2 or ILK siRNA, when compared to treatment with control siRNA (Fig. 6b). Similarly, the mesenchymal morphology caused by EGF treatment was not abrogated by any of the siRNAs (Fig. 6c).

Together, it seems to suggest that these candidates do not directly mediate the EMT induced by EGF in this breast cancer cell line.

We then investigated what effect the stepwise increase in integrin expression, observed in the EDW01 xenografts (Fig. 4), may have had on growth and invasion/motility of these tumours over serial passages in mice, inferred by parallel analyses in the PMC42-ET cells. We focused on cell adhesion to various substrates and migration, properties known to be mediated by integrins and ILK, and these were again examined in PMC42-ET cells.

PMC42-ET cells require ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK for maximal adherence to collagen I, collagen IV, laminin and fibronectin substrates, as knockdown of these molecules significantly reduced adhesion in comparison to control siRNA (Fig. 7a–d, p < 0.05). When stimulated with EGF, the attachment of the PMC42-ET cells treated with ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK siRNA was also significantly abrogated (p < 0.001).

Fig. 7
figure7

Inhibition of PMC42-ET breast cancer cell adhesion to a collagen I, b collagen IV, c laminin and d fibronectin, by integrin subunit-specific and ILK siRNAs. Results are expressed as % of cells adhered and represent the mean ± SD from 4 biological replicates. Results were analysed using two-way ANOVA, with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, with P values adjusted for multiple comparisons; *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001

Coordinated regulation of cell adhesion and adhesion complex remodelling are crucial for cell movement. ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK siRNA-mediated silencing in PMC42-ET cells caused them to be significantly less migratory, as shown by the assessment of migration using the Boyden Chamber Assay (Fig. 8a) and the Monolayer Wound Healing assay (Fig. 8b). Inhibition of ILK by a specific inhibitor, QLT0267, also significantly reduced cellular movement in the Boyden Chamber Assay (Fig. 8c, p < 0.001). EGF treatment caused these cells to increase their migration, whereas ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK silencing each significantly reduced migration in both assays under EGF-stimulated conditions (Fig. 8a, b, p < 0.05).

Fig. 8
figure8

Migration properties of PMC42-ET cells following siRNA knockdown of ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK without and with stimulation by EGF. Effect on migration was assessed using the a Boyden Chamber and b scratch-wound assays. Data are expressed as percentage of control and represent the mean ± SD from 3 biological replicates. c Effect of ILK inhibitor QLT0267 (used at 6.25 μM, in DMSO) on PMC42-ET cell migration in the Boyden Chamber assay. Results represent average cell counts from of 5 random high-power fields from three independent experiments, error bars represent standard deviation. For a, statistical significance (*p < 0.05, comparison to control siRNA) was determined using two-way ANOVA, with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. For b, statistical significance was determined using two-way ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. For c, statistical significance (***p < 0.0001) was determined using unpaired two-tailed t test with Welch’s correction

Evaluation of ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK with respect to clinical parameters in breast cancers: analysis of a published dataset

Gene expression levels of ITGA2, ITGB1 and ILK were assessed across a previously published breast cancer cohort [65] with respect to regression-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and progression-free survival (PFS), specifically examining Luminal A breast cancers. Of the genes examined, only ILK was found to be significant, and only for regression-free survival, with high expression being predictive of this clinical parameter. These results are shown in tabular form in Supplementary Fig. 7. Kaplan-Meier curves for ILK in regard to RFS are shown in Fig. 9. Its expression in Luminal A breast cancers is shown compared to RFS in other breast cancer molecular subtypes of Luminal B, Basal and Her-2. The results show that ILK specifically predicts improved RFS in Luminal A breast cancers.

Fig. 9
figure9

Kaplan-Meier curves of regression-free survival data examining expression of ILK across various breast cancers of varying molecular phenotypes. P values of ITGB1 and ITGA2 along with ILK to predict other clinical parameters in Luminal A tumours are shown in Supplementary Fig. 7. Data acquired from a publically available database [65]

Discussion

We have shown that the EDW01 PDX model displayed evidence of EMT with progressive passages through mice, which was not seen in ED03. This is consistent with the known EMT status of IDC versus ILC, of which EDW01 and ED03 are examples, respectively. However, a comparison of the progression of such divergent cancer types with regard to EMT status has enabled the discovery of some unique findings. The partial EMT observed in EDW01 was associated with a rising hypoxia leading to Twist1 expression in early-mid passages, repressing E-cadherin expression and orchestrating vimentin upregulation, and accompanied by upregulation of ITGB1 and ITGA2 expression. The mesenchymal shift appeared to then return to the epithelial direction in later passages of EDW01; however, the increased integrin expression persisted. We present cell line data to support the association of ITGA2/B1 and the ILK signalling pathway with the observed EMT, but the EMT was not mediated by these. Assessment of ITGA2/B1 and ILK expression in a published Luminal breast cancer dataset was not consistent with the pro-aggressive implications of our association with EMT in the EDW-01 PDX, since ILK predicted improved regression-free survival post treatment. Thus, further analysis of this association in other models is required to refine the interpretation.

Although the EMT-associated ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK are not essential for EGF-induced EMT in PMC42-ET cells (Fig. 6), they are necessary for breast cancer cell adhesion to ECM-substrates (Fig. 7) and cellular movement (Fig. 8). These molecules were more significantly upregulated in increasing EDW01 passages through mice than ED03 (Figs. 3 and 4); thus, they may have enabled ECM adhesion in this PDX. Indeed, previous studies demonstrate that ITGA2/B1 is primarily a receptor for collagen and laminin [66] and expression is also associated with motility, invasiveness, and cellular differentiation of a variety of tumours [67, 68]. This is in contrast to studies in which ITGA2 and ITGB1 have been found to suppress metastasis in models of mouse and human cancer [69]. However, Dedhar and Saulnier [70] showed that the expression of ITGA2/B1 increased in the chemically transformed human osteosarcoma cells, and this integrin was implicated in tumour progression and metastasis. Similarly, ITGA2/B1 expression accelerated either experimental metastasis or tumour dissemination of melanoma [71] and rhabdomyosarcoma [72, 73], gastric cancer [74, 75] and colon cancer cells [76]. Taken together, our data suggest that ITGA2/B1 contribute to the EMT phenotype observed increasingly in EDW01 over serial passages in mice.

The PDX models of ED03 and EDW01 were characterised as luminal A (ER positive, Her2 negative, PR low or absent) whereas the PMC42-ET breast cancer cell line used in this study was of the Basal B molecular phenotype [63]. However, luminal A cell lines lack the degree of plasticity that is clearly evident in the EDW-01 PDX, so we felt it was justified to compare the PMC42-ET cell line that also exhibits plasticity. The PMC42-ET cells also largely exhibit an epithelioid appearance, despite constitutive vimentin-expression, and we have shown that they respond to EMT-inducing regimens such as EGF. We acknowledge that this is a limitation of our study which directly influences the conclusions that we can logically make in regard to the importance of ITGA2/B1 in cancer progression.

Actively growing tumours acquire areas of hypoxia, a product of imperfect angiogenesis coupled with rapid growth, which can facilitate cellular invasion via the induction of EMT [77]. Vimentin and Twist1 positivity was observed in close proximity to necrotic areas in early passages and less commonly found at the centre of tumour ‘islands’ (Fig. 3). Of the E-cadherin repressor genes examined, TWIST1, a target of HIF1A [78,79,80] displayed the strongest correlative pattern of induction with CAIX (Fig. 6b, R2 = 0.81, p = 0.04). Induction of TWIST1 coincided with the repression of CDH1 and induction of VIM mRNA and therefore may be the instigator of the observed EMT in the EDW01 xenograft model. Indeed, hypoxia has been implicated in inducing EMT-related genes in another PDX model of serial transplantation. Wegner and colleagues [81] demonstrate in their cervical cancer PDX model serially transplanted in mice that the EMT orchestrating gene SNAI1 and stem cell markers were found to be increased in late compared to early passages along with hypoxic CAIX gene expression, accompanied with an increase in tumour aggressiveness and proliferative rate. Their finding, in a different cancer type (cervical), adds further support to our suggestion that hypoxia may have been a major driving force in the observed progressive EMT in the EDW01 PDX model.

However, why did the mesenchymal shift return to epithelial in later passages of EDW01? Tumours in vivo have been found to adapt to low oxygen environments, such as reprogramming Akt signalling in the mitochondria [82]. This coupled with the well-known ability of tumours to increase angiogenesis [83] contributes to tumour cell survival and progression. Although beyond the scope of this investigation, the EDW01 PDX model provides a means to investigate these phenomena further, with relevance to understanding the progression of breast cancer in women.

Although many studies have associated EMT with therapy resistance [11, 84], it is important to note that the EDW01 xenograft was not challenged by therapy; the EMT progression was spontaneous. Interestingly, considerable emphasis is being placed recently on the hybrid state of EMP recently [6, 85,86,87,88], and this phenotype appears to manifest in the EDW01 xenografts (elevated vimentin and apparently only partially lost E-cadherin as shown in Figs. 3 and 4). A separate analysis of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in the ED03 model indicate that despite the lack of any evidence of EMT in the primary xenograft tumours, the CTCs are enriched in mesenchymal gene expression, but also in epithelial genes (CDH1 and CD24), compared to the primary tumour, indicating a dysregulation of this axis and/or possibility of hybrid cells [58].

Tumour-stroma crosstalk plays an integral role in EMT in vivo [89]; similarly, we observed key changes in murine stroma in the PDX models examined in this study. We have previously demonstrated that EDW01 evoked greater expression of MMPs (-2, -9, -11 and MT1-MMP) in the murine stroma than ED03 [56]. Furthermore, EDW01 displayed MT1-MMP and MMP-13 at the tumour-stromal boundary, but did not express these factors or MMP-2 and MMP-9 within the tumour mass itself. As shown in the current study, the EDW01 tumours grew as islands traversed by thick collagenous stromal bands whereas the ED03 had delicate pericellular stroma dispersed throughout (Fig. 1). This pattern of growth may be directly attributable to the pattern of MMP expression of each of these PDX models—EDW01 lacked the capacity to invade as individual cells, possibly due to the lack of induction of intratumoural MMP-2 and MMP-9. Furthermore, the murine microenvironment (non-orthotopic) in which the EMT occurred in the EDW01 PDX over successive passages may have been conducive to this change. We found that murine (stromal) Itgb1 expression aligned with human (tumoural) expression of the same integrin; in fact for EDW01, stromal Itgb1 expression was approximately 22-fold higher than tumoural ITGB1 at passage 7 (Fig. 4). This leads to speculation as to whether the murine microenvironment was the instigator of the EMT or a responder in this process. However, given that an EMT was not observed in the ED03 line, which was passaged through mice of the same genotype (SCID), it could be postulated that drivers of EMT came from within the tumour itself, lending further support to the notion that hypoxia was an initiating event.

Decreased CD44/CD24 expression ratio in later passages in both PDX lines was an unexpected finding, at least in EDW01, as CD24+/high/CD44low− phenotype is associated with the epithelial phenotype despite EMT being observed in this xenograft model. However, CD24 expression can also confer adhesive properties enabling invasion. In a meta-analysis of 16 studies of 5697 breast cancers, CD24 was found to be significantly associated with poorer survival [90], presumably due to non EMP functions. In studies on breast cancer cell lines in vivo, CD24 was found to act as a ligand for P-selectin on the lung vascular endothelium [64]. We found that CD24, but not CD44, correlated with ITGA2 and ITGB1 in both PDX models (Fig. 5b, ii versus iii), providing further suggestion, in addition to our PMC42-ET integrin knockdown/EGF studies (Fig. 6), that activation of these integrins is not necessarily intimately related to the EMT process. We recognise the limitation that the PMC42-ET cellular behaviour was examined in two-dimensional culture, and as such, our observations are hypothesis generating and require further validation.

Posttranslational cleavage of CD44 may explain the discrepancy between CD44 protein expression between the two PDXs—EDW01 CD44 gene expression is comparable with ED03 (Fig. 4) whereas CD44 membranous protein expression is strong and uniform in ED03 but somewhat weaker and more heterogeneous in EDW01 (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 45). CD44 may be shed from the cell by the action of MMPs, namely MMP-9 and MT1-MMP [91, 92], resulting in the loss of cell membrane CD44. The CD44 antibody used in this study (clone 156-3C11, Abcam) recognises cell-membrane localised CD44. As previously mentioned in our earlier studies, EDW01 evoked greater expression of MMPs (-2, -9, -11 and MT1-MMP) in the murine stroma than ED03 [56]. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 4, the homogeneous versus heterogeneous CD44 expression in ED03 compared with EDW01 associates with the interruption of growing tumour by murine stroma, as illustrated by Masson’s Trichrome staining, where connective tissue stains blue. A greater level of CD44 cleavage and shedding may have occurred in EDW01 PDX tumours than ED03, facilitated by stromal MMPs, resulting in the observed heterogeneous pattern. MMP-directed CD44 cleavage results in nuclear translocation of the intracellular CD44 domain [93], which can result in the transcriptional activation of EMT-associated genes [94, 95] and induction of stemness [96]. Nuclear CD44 has been shown to occupy the TWIST1 promoter [96]; therefore, CD44 cleavage in EDW01 could have contributed to TWIST1 transcriptional upregulation (Fig. 5a).

Conclusion

This study illustrates a cumulative EMT in a PDX system through several passages in mice, an effect characterised by, but not orchestrated by, ILK signalling via ITGA2 and ITGB1, and possibly ILK.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. 1.

    du Manoir S, Orsetti B, Bras-Goncalves R, Nguyen TT, Lasorsa L, Boissiere F, Massemin B, Colombo PE, Bibeau F, Jacot W, et al. Breast tumor PDXs are genetically plastic and correspond to a subset of aggressive cancers prone to relapse. Mol Oncol. 2014;8(2):431–43.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhang X, Claerhout S, Prat A, Dobrolecki LE, Petrovic I, Lai Q, Landis MD, Wiechmann L, Schiff R, Giuliano M, et al. A renewable tissue resource of phenotypically stable, biologically and ethnically diverse, patient-derived human breast cancer xenograft models. Cancer Res. 2013;73(15):4885–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dobrolecki LE, Airhart SD, Alferez DG, Aparicio S, Behbod F, Bentires-Alj M, Brisken C, Bult CJ, Cai S, Clarke RB, et al. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):547–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sulaiman A, Wang L. Bridging the divide: preclinical research discrepancies between triple-negative breast cancer cell lines and patient tumors. Oncotarget. 2017;8(68):113269–81.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Whittle JR, Lewis MT, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Patient-derived xenograft models of breast cancer and their predictive power. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Williams ED, Gao D, Redfern A, Thompson EW. Controversies around epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19(12):716–32.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Francart ME, Lambert J, Vanwynsberghe AM, Thompson EW, Bourcy M, Polette M, Gilles C. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and circulating tumor cells: travel companions to metastases. Dev Dyn. 2018;247(3):432–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Brabletz T, Kalluri R, Nieto MA, Weinberg RA. EMT in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(2):128–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chaffer CL, San Juan BP, Lim E, Weinberg RA. EMT, cell plasticity and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35(4):645–54.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. Emt: 2016. Cell. 2016;166(1):21–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Redfern AD, Spalding LJ, Thompson EW. The Kraken Wakes: induced EMT as a driver of tumour aggression and poor outcome. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018;35(4):285–308.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fischer KR, Durrans A, Lee S, Sheng J, Li F, Wong ST, Choi H, El Rayes T, Ryu S, Troeger J, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature. 2015;527(7579):472–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Tachtsidis A, McInnes LM, Jacobsen N, Thompson EW, Saunders CM. Minimal residual disease in breast cancer: an overview of circulating and disseminated tumour cells. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33(6):521–50.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Alix-Panabieres C, Mader S, Pantel K. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in circulating tumor cells. J Mol Med (Berl). 2017;95(2):133–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yu M, Bardia A, Wittner BS, Stott SL, Smas ME, Ting DT, Isakoff SJ, Ciciliano JC, Wells MN, Shah AM, et al. Circulating breast tumor cells exhibit dynamic changes in epithelial and mesenchymal composition. Science. 2013;339(6119):580–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bonnomet A, Syne L, Brysse A, Feyereisen E, Thompson EW, Noel A, Foidart JM, Birembaut P, Polette M, Gilles C. A dynamic in vivo model of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in circulating tumor cells and metastases of breast cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31(33):3741–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gunasinghe NP, Wells A, Thompson EW, Hugo HJ. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) as a mechanism for metastatic colonisation in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31(3–4):469–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hugo HJ, Gunasinghe N, Hollier BG, Tanaka T, Blick T, Toh A, Hill P, Gilles C, Waltham M, Thompson EW. Epithelial requirement for in vitro proliferation and xenograft growth and metastasis of MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer cells: oncogenic rather than tumor-suppressive role of E-cadherin. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Blick T, Hugo H, Widodo E, Waltham M, Pinto C, Mani SA, Weinberg RA, Neve RM, Lenburg ME, Thompson EW. Epithelial mesenchymal transition traits in human breast cancer cell lines parallel the CD44(hi/)CD24 (lo/−) stem cell phenotype in human breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2010;15(2):235–52.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Santamaria PG, Moreno-Bueno G, Portillo F, Cano A. EMT: present and future in clinical oncology. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(7):718–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhao H, Langerod A, Ji Y, Nowels KW, Nesland JM, Tibshirani R, Bukholm IK, Karesen R, Botstein D, Borresen-Dale AL, et al. Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(6):2523–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Berx G, Cleton-Jansen AM, Strumane K, de Leeuw WJ, Nollet F, van Roy F, Cornelisse C. E-cadherin is inactivated in a majority of invasive human lobular breast cancers by truncation mutations throughout its extracellular domain. Oncogene. 1996;13(9):1919–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    McCart Reed AE, Kutasovic JR, Lakhani SR, Simpson PT. Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: morphology, biomarkers and 'omics. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:12.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Hirohashi S. Inactivation of the E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion system in human cancers. Am J Pathol. 1998;153(2):333–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ciriello G, Gatza ML, Beck AH, Wilkerson MD, Rhie SK, Pastore A, Zhang H, McLellan M, Yau C, Kandoth C, et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell. 2015;163(2):506–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hugo H, Ackland ML, Blick T, Lawrence MG, Clements JA, Williams ED, Thompson EW. Epithelial--mesenchymal and mesenchymal--epithelial transitions in carcinoma progression. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(2):374–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hugo HJ, Kokkinos MI, Blick T, Ackland ML, Thompson EW, Newgreen DF. Defining the E-cadherin repressor interactome in epithelial-mesenchymal transition: the PMC42 model as a case study. Cells Tissues Organs. 2011;193(1–2):23–40.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gheldof A, Berx G. Cadherins and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2013;116:317–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Grzegrzolka J, Biala M, Wojtyra P, Kobierzycki C, Olbromski M, Gomulkiewicz A, Piotrowska A, Rys J, Podhorska-Okolow M, Dziegiel P. Expression of EMT markers SLUG and TWIST in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015;35(7):3961–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sarrio D, Perez-Mies B, Hardisson D, Moreno-Bueno G, Suarez A, Cano A, Martin-Perez J, Gamallo C, Palacios J. Cytoplasmic localization of p120ctn and E-cadherin loss characterize lobular breast carcinoma from preinvasive to metastatic lesions. Oncogene. 2004;23(19):3272–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    McCart Reed AE, Kutasovic JR, Vargas AC, Jayanthan J, Al-Murrani A, Reid LE, Chambers R, Da Silva L, Melville L, Evans E, et al. An epithelial to mesenchymal transition programme does not usually drive the phenotype of invasive lobular carcinomas. J Pathol. 2016;238(4):489–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Domagala W, Wozniak L, Lasota J, Weber K, Osborn M. Vimentin is preferentially expressed in high-grade ductal and medullary, but not in lobular breast carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 1990;137(5):1059–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Madamanchi A, Zijlstra A, Zutter MM. Flipping the switch: integrin switching provides metastatic competence. Sci Signal. 2014;7(318):pe9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sokeland G, Schumacher U. The functional role of integrins during intra- and extravasation within the metastatic cascade. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell. 2002;110(6):673–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Naci D, El Azreq MA, Chetoui N, Lauden L, Sigaux F, Charron D, Al-Daccak R. Aoudjit F: alpha2beta1 integrin promotes chemoresistance against doxorubicin in cancer cells through extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). J Biol Chem. 2012;287(21):17065–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Giancotti FG, Mainiero F. Integrin-mediated adhesion and signaling in tumorigenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1198(1):47–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hynes RO. Integrins: versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion. Cell. 1992;69(1):11–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yang X, Pursell B, Lu S, Chang TK, Mercurio AM. Regulation of beta 4-integrin expression by epigenetic modifications in the mammary gland and during the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 14):2473–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kim KK, Wei Y, Szekeres C, Kugler MC, Wolters PJ, Hill ML, Frank JA, Brumwell AN, Wheeler SE, Kreidberg JA, et al. Epithelial cell alpha3beta1 integrin links beta-catenin and Smad signaling to promote myofibroblast formation and pulmonary fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(1):213–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Maschler S, Wirl G, Spring H, Bredow DV, Sordat I, Beug H, Reichmann E. Tumor cell invasiveness correlates with changes in integrin expression and localization. Oncogene. 2005;24(12):2032–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mise N, Savai R, Yu H, Schwarz J, Kaminski N, Eickelberg O. Zyxin is a transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)/Smad3 target gene that regulates lung cancer cell motility via integrin alpha5beta1. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(37):31393–405.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Koenig A, Mueller C, Hasel C, Adler G, Menke A. Collagen type I induces disruption of E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell contacts and promotes proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4662–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Madamanchi A, Santoro SA. Zutter MM: alpha2beta1 Integrin. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;819:41–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Naci D, Vuori K, Aoudjit F. Alpha2beta1 integrin in cancer development and chemoresistance. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35:145–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Shintani Y, Fukumoto Y, Chaika N, Svoboda R, Wheelock MJ, Johnson KR. Collagen I-mediated up-regulation of N-cadherin requires cooperative signals from integrins and discoidin domain receptor 1. J Cell Biol. 2008;180(6):1277–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Chen FA, Alosco T, Croy BA, Narumi K, Percy DH, Bankert RB. Clones of tumor cells derived from a single primary human lung tumor reveal different patterns of beta 1 integrin expression. Cell Adhes Commun. 1994;2(4):345–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Becker-Santos DD, Guo Y, Ghaffari M, Vickers ED, Lehman M, Altamirano-Dimas M, Oloumi A, Furukawa J, Sharma M, Wang Y, et al. Integrin-linked kinase as a target for ERG-mediated invasive properties in prostate cancer models. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33(12):2558–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chen D, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Li J, Han B, Liu S, Wang L, Ling Y, Mao S, Wang X. Overexpression of integrin-linked kinase correlates with malignant phenotype in non-small cell lung cancer and promotes lung cancer cell invasion and migration via regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes. Acta Histochem. 2013;115(2):128–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Serrano I, McDonald PC, Lock FE, Dedhar S. Role of the integrin-linked kinase (ILK)/Rictor complex in TGFbeta-1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Oncogene. 2013;32(1):50–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wu C, Dedhar S. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and its interactors: a new paradigm for the coupling of extracellular matrix to actin cytoskeleton and signaling complexes. J Cell Biol. 2001;155(4):505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Somasiri A, Howarth A, Goswami D, Dedhar S, Roskelley CD. Overexpression of the integrin-linked kinase mesenchymally transforms mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Sci. 2001;114(Pt 6):1125–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Guaita S, Puig I, Franci C, Garrido M, Dominguez D, Batlle E, Sancho E, Dedhar S, De Herreros AG, Baulida J. Snail induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in tumor cells is accompanied by MUC1 repression and ZEB1 expression. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(42):39209–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Novak A, Hsu SC, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Radeva G, Papkoff J, Montesano R, Roskelley C, Grosschedl R, Dedhar S. Cell adhesion and the integrin-linked kinase regulate the LEF-1 and beta-catenin signaling pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(8):4374–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Persad S, Dedhar S. The role of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2003;22(4):375–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Lafleur MA, Drew AF, de Sousa EL, Blick T, Bills M, Walker EC, Williams ED, Waltham M, Thompson EW. Upregulation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in breast cancer xenografts: a major induction of stromal MMP-13. Int J Cancer. 2005;114(4):544–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hugo HJ, Pereira L, Suryadinata R, Drabsch Y, Gonda TJ, Gunasinghe NP, Pinto C, Soo ET, van Denderen BJ, Hill P, et al. Direct repression of MYB by ZEB1 suppresses proliferation and epithelial gene expression during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(6):R113.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Tachtsidis A, Le AV, Blick T, Gunasinghe D, De Sousa E, Waltham M, Dobrovic A, Thompson EW. Human-specific RNA analysis shows uncoupled epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in circulating and disseminated tumour cells from human breast cancer xenografts. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2019;36(4):393–409.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T, Clark L, Bayani N, Coppe JP, Tong F, et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell. 2006;10(6):515–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Price JT, Thompson EW. Models for studying cellular invasion of basement membranes. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;129:231–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ, Panel m: Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol, 2011 22(8):1736–1747.

  62. 62.

    Harburger DS, Calderwood DA. Integrin signalling at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 2):159–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cursons J, Leuchowius KJ, Waltham M, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Foroutan M, Bracken CP, Redfern A, Crampin EJ, Street I, Davis MJ, et al. Stimulus-dependent differences in signalling regulate epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and change the effects of drugs in breast cancer cell lines. Cell Commun Signal. 2015;13:26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Baumann P, Cremers N, Kroese F, Orend G, Chiquet-Ehrismann R, Uede T, Yagita H, Sleeman JP. CD24 expression causes the acquisition of multiple cellular properties associated with tumor growth and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65(23):10783–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Gyorffy B, Lanczky A, Eklund AC, Denkert C, Budczies J, Li Q, Szallasi Z. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):725–31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Zutter MM, Santoro SA. Widespread histologic distribution of the alpha 2 beta 1 integrin cell-surface collagen receptor. Am J Pathol. 1990;137(1):113–20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Felding-Habermann B, O'Toole TE, Smith JW, Fransvea E, Ruggeri ZM, Ginsberg MH, Hughes PE, Pampori N, Shattil SJ, Saven A, et al. Integrin activation controls metastasis in human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(4):1853–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hood JD, Cheresh DA. Role of integrins in cell invasion and migration. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(2):91–100.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Ramirez NE, Zhang Z, Madamanchi A, Boyd KL, O'Rear LD, Nashabi A, Li Z, Dupont WD, Zijlstra A, Zutter MM. The alpha(2)beta(1) integrin is a metastasis suppressor in mouse models and human cancer. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(1):226–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Dedhar S, Saulnier R. Alterations in integrin receptor expression on chemically transformed human cells: specific enhancement of laminin and collagen receptor complexes. J Cell Biol. 1990;110(2):481–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Baronas-Lowell D, Lauer-Fields JL, Borgia JA, Sferrazza GF, Al-Ghoul M, Minond D, Fields GB. Differential modulation of human melanoma cell metalloproteinase expression by alpha2beta1 integrin and CD44 triple-helical ligands derived from type IV collagen. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(42):43503–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chan BM, Matsuura N, Takada Y, Zetter BR, Hemler ME. In vitro and in vivo consequences of VLA-2 expression on rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Science. 1991;251(5001):1600–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hannigan GE, Leung-Hagesteijn C, Fitz-Gibbon L, Coppolino MG, Radeva G, Filmus J, Bell JC, Dedhar S. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase. Nature. 1996;379(6560):91–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ura H, Denno R, Hirata K, Yamaguchi K, Yasoshima T. Separate functions of alpha2beta1 and alpha3beta1 integrins in the metastatic process of human gastric carcinoma. Surg Today. 1998;28(10):1001–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Matsuoka T, Yashiro M, Nishimura S, Inoue T, Fujihara T, Sawada T, Kato Y, Seki S, Hirakawa-Ys Chung K. Increased expression of alpha2beta1-integrin in the peritoneal dissemination of human gastric carcinoma. Int J Mol Med. 2000;5(1):21–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Bartolome RA, Barderas R, Torres S, Fernandez-Acenero MJ, Mendes M, Garcia-Foncillas J, Lopez-Lucendo M, Casal JI. Cadherin-17 interacts with alpha2beta1 integrin to regulate cell proliferation and adhesion in colorectal cancer cells causing liver metastasis. Oncogene. 2014;33(13):1658–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Cooke VG, LeBleu VS, Keskin D, Khan Z, O'Connell JT, Teng Y, Duncan MB, Xie L, Maeda G, Vong S, et al. Pericyte depletion results in hypoxia-associated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis mediated by met signaling pathway. Cancer Cell. 2012;21(1):66–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Yang MH, Wu KJ. TWIST activation by hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1): implications in metastasis and development. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(14):2090–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Vesuna F, van Diest P, Chen JH, Raman V. Twist is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367(2):235–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Zhang L, Huang G, Li X, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Shen J, Liu J, Wang Q, Zhu J, Feng X, et al. Hypoxia induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activation of SNAI1 by hypoxia-inducible factor -1alpha in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:108.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Wegner CS, Hauge A, Andersen LMK, Huang R, Simonsen TG, Gaustad JV, Rofstad EK. Increasing aggressiveness of patient-derived xenograft models of cervix carcinoma during serial transplantation. Oncotarget. 2018;9(30):21036–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Chae YC, Vaira V, Caino MC, Tang HY, Seo JH, Kossenkov AV, Ottobrini L, Martelli C, Lucignani G, Bertolini I, et al. Mitochondrial Akt regulation of hypoxic tumor reprogramming. Cancer Cell. 2016;30(2):257–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285(21):1182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Bhatia S, Monkman J, Toh AKL, Nagaraj SH, Thompson EW. Targeting epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer: clinical and preclinical advances in therapy and monitoring. Biochem J. 2017;474(19):3269–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Lee JM, Dedhar S, Kalluri R, Thompson EW. The epithelial-mesenchymal transition: new insights in signaling, development, and disease. J Cell Biol. 2006;172(7):973–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Jolly MK, Tripathi SC, Jia D, Mooney SM, Celiktas M, Hanash SM, Mani SA, Pienta KJ, Ben-Jacob E, Levine H. Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype. Oncotarget. 2016;7(19):27067–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Pastushenko I, Brisebarre A, Sifrim A, Fioramonti M, Revenco T, Boumahdi S, Van Keymeulen A, Brown D, Moers V, Lemaire S, et al. Identification of the tumour transition states occurring during EMT. Nature. 2018;556(7702):463–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Puram SV, Tirosh I, Parikh AS, Patel AP, Yizhak K, Gillespie S, Rodman C, Luo CL, Mroz EA, Emerick KS, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of primary and metastatic tumor ecosystems in head and neck cancer. Cell. 2017;171(7):1611–24 e1624.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hugo HJ, Lebret S, Tomaskovic-Crook E, Ahmed N, Blick T, Newgreen DF, Thompson EW, Ackland ML. Contribution of fibroblast and mast cell (afferent) and tumor (efferent) IL-6 effects within the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. 2012;5(1):83–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Wang Z, Wang Q, Wang Q, Wang Y, Chen J. Prognostic significance of CD24 and CD44 in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32(1):e75–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Chetty C, Vanamala SK, Gondi CS, Dinh DH, Gujrati M, Rao JS. MMP-9 induces CD44 cleavage and CD44 mediated cell migration in glioblastoma xenograft cells. Cell Signal. 2012;24(2):549–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Mori H, Tomari T, Koshikawa N, Kajita M, Itoh Y, Sato H, Tojo H, Yana I, Seiki M. CD44 directs membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase to lamellipodia by associating with its hemopexin-like domain. EMBO J. 2002;21(15):3949–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Nagano O, Saya H. Mechanism and biological significance of CD44 cleavage. Cancer Sci. 2004;95(12):930–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Miyazaki H, Takahashi RU, Prieto-Vila M, Kawamura Y, Kondo S, Shirota T, Ochiya T. CD44 exerts a functional role during EMT induction in cisplatin-resistant head and neck cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2018;9(11):10029–41.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Cho SH, Park YS, Kim HJ, Kim CH, Lim SW, Huh JW, Lee JH, Kim HR. CD44 enhances the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in association with colon cancer invasion. Int J Oncol. 2012;41(1):211–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Su YJ, Lai HM, Chang YW, Chen GY, Lee JL. Direct reprogramming of stem cell properties in colon cancer cells by CD44. EMBO J. 2011;30(15):3186–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Pathology laboratory and the Translational Research Institute Histology Core for performing IHC contained in this manuscript. We are also indebted to the two women who donated their cancer tissue for this work. This manuscript is dedicated to their memory.

Funding

This research was supported in part by the National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia, #1027527) and the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Australia (EMPathy National Collaborative Research Program, CG-10-04).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RW generated 50% of the real-time PCR data and all siRNA work including associated Western blots. EDW performed EDW01 PDX generation initiation and harvest and maintained records. EdeS performed all ED03 generation initiation and harvest and maintained records. PTS and JRK performed P120, Ki67 and beta-catenin IHC and PTS provided direct guidance in scoring. AER performed ED03 CDH1 mutation analyses. MW assisted in ED03 and EDW01 generation initiation and harvest. CES assisted in hormone receptor IHC interpretation and PDX morphology analysis. TB assisted in all statistical analysis. EWT and HJH designed the study and provided intellectual input as to the direction of the work and HJH performed 50% real-time data, remaining IHC, and drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honor J. Hugo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All human tissue samples used in this study and associated approval and consent to participate was obtained in accordance with the standards of the St. Vincent’s Hospital Human Ethics Committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Fig. 1. Stromal area in EDW01 tumour cores across serial passaging in mice does not increase. Connective tissue visualised by the Masson’s Trichrome stain, × 4 magnification, scale bar = 200 μM.

Additional file 2:

Supplementary Fig. 2. H&E stained sections of the donor blocks from which representative duplicate cores were taken for creation of a tissue micro-array recipient block, which was then used for all immunohistochemistry and histochemical staining depicted in this manuscript. Part A depicts donor blocks used for cores shown in Fig. 1, part B depicts donor blocks used for cores shown in Fig. 2A, and part C depicts donor blocks used for cores shown in Fig. 3. 0.4x magnification, scale bar = 2 mm. 0.8x magnification, scale bar = 1 mm.

Additional file 3:

Supplementary Fig. 3. Image J-based quantification of IHC targets that displayed the greatest visual change between PDXs and across passages 3 to 7 for both PDXs: E-cadherin, Vimentin and Twist1. Relative intensity per cell was calculated by dividing the overall area of DAB positivity for the IHC target by overall nuclear area. Statistical significance was determined by an Ordinary one-way ANOVA, where * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates p < 0.005.

Additional file 4:

Supplementary Fig. 4. A Representative images of CD44 and Masson’s Trichrome for the the ED03 and EDW01 PDXs at the indicated passage numbers. The numbers of xenografts examined at various passage numbers are as follows: for ED03 – p3: 6; p5: 5; p7: 7; for EDW01 – p3: 8; p5: 8; p7: 3. Magnification 4x, scale bar = 200 μM. B. CD44/24 images shown in Fig. 3, split into their respective colours to illustrate staining. Magnification 10x, scale bar = 100 μM.

Additional file 5:

Supplementary Fig. 5. Image J-based quantification of relative intensity per cell of IHC targets that displayed the greatest visual change between PDXs and across passages 3 to 7 for both PDXs: CD24 and CD44. Relative intensity per cell was calculated by dividing the overall area of DAB positivity for the IHC target by overall nuclear area. Statistical significance was determined by an Ordinary one-way ANOVA, where * indicates p < 0.05 and ** indicates p < 0.005.

Additional file 6:

Supplementary Fig. 6 EGF treatment (10 ng/ml, 72 h) of PMC42-ET breast cancer cells resulted in an EMT which associated with an upregulation (trend only) of ITGB1, ITGA2 and ILK. A. Phase contrast morphology, B. gene expression changes as assessed by RT-qPCR. Results are from one experiment, representative of two independent experiments. Error bars are standard deviation of n = 3 technical replicates within 1 biological replicate (1 experiment). C. Western blotting for vimentin, E-cadherin, and actin across the EGF time course. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Additional file 7:

Supplementary Fig. 7. Assessment of clinical parameters (Regression Free Survival-RFS, Overall Survival-OS, Distant Metastasis Free Survival-DMFS and Progression Free Survival-PFS) in Luminal A cancers with respect to high versus low ITGB1, ITGA2 or ILK expression, as derived from a previously published database [65].

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wafai, R., Williams, E.D., de Souza, E. et al. Integrin alpha-2 and beta-1 expression increases through multiple generations of the EDW01 patient-derived xenograft model of breast cancer—insight into their role in epithelial mesenchymal transition in vivo gained from an in vitro model system. Breast Cancer Res 22, 136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-020-01366-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Integrin
  • Hypoxia
  • Twist1
  • EMT
  • Breast cancer
  • Patient-derived xenograft (PDX)