Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Thyroid hormones and breast cancer association according to menopausal status and body mass index

  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 5, 6,
  • 7,
  • 8 and
  • 3, 9Email authorView ORCID ID profile
Breast Cancer Research201820:94

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-018-1017-8

  • Received: 9 February 2018
  • Accepted: 10 July 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Thyroxine (T4) has been positively associated with tumor cell proliferation, while the effect of triiodothyronine (T3) on cell proliferation has not been well-established because it differs according to the type of cell line used. In Mexico, it has been reported that 14.5% of adult women have some type of thyroid dysfunction and abnormalities in thyroid function tests have been observed in a variety of non-thyroidal illnesses, including breast cancer (BC). These abnormalities might change with body mass index (BMI) because thyroid hormones are involved in the regulation of various metabolic pathways and probably by menopausal status because obesity has been negatively associated with BC in premenopausal women and has been positively associated with BC in postmenopausal women.

Methods

To assess the association between serum thyroid hormone concentration (T4 and T3) and BC and the influence of obesity as an effect modifier of this relationship in premenopausal and postmenopausal women, we measured serum thyroid hormone and thyroid antibody levels in 682 patients with incident breast cancer (cases) and 731 controls, who participated in a population-based case-control study performed from 2004 to 2007 in three states of Mexico. We tested the association of total T4 (TT4) and total T3 (TT3) stratifying by menopausal status and body mass index (BMI), and adjusted for other health and demographic risk factors using logistic regressions models.

Results

Higher serum total T4 (TT4) concentrations were associated with BC in both premenopausal (odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation = 5.98, 95% CI 3.01–11.90) and postmenopausal women (OR per standard deviation = 2.81, 95% CI 2.17–3.65). In premenopausal women, the effect of TT4 decreased as BMI increased while the opposite was observed in postmenopausal women. The significance of the effect modification was marginal (p = 0.059) in postmenopausal women and was not significant in premenopausal women (p = 0.22). Lower TT3 concentrations were associated with BC in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women and no effect modification was observed.

Conclusions

There is a strong association between BC and serum concentrations of TT3 and TT4; this needs to be further investigated to understand why it happens and how important it is to consider these alterations in treatment.

Keywords

  • Thyroid hormones
  • Triiodothyronine
  • Thyroxine
  • Obesity
  • Breast cancer

Background

The association between thyroid hormones and the risk of breast cancer (BC) has been reported in epidemiological studies [1, 2]. A positive association has been reported between thyroxine (T4) and risk of BC, which is more pronounced in overweight and obese women [1]. Negative associations have been reported between triiodothyronine (T3) and BC among premenopausal women; in contrast, positive associations have been observed among postmenopausal women [2]. It has been shown that in in vitro studies, thyroid hormones affect the growth of BC-derived cell lines [3], lung cancer [4], and glioblastoma [5]. T4 has been shown to increase cell proliferation through the αvβ3 integrin receptor found on the plasma membrane of cells [3]. In contrast, the effect of T3 on cell proliferation has not been well-established because it differs by the type of cell line used [68]. These effects are important, since abnormalities in thyroid function tests have been observed in a variety of non-thyroidal illnesses, without preexisting thyroid or hypothalamic-pituitary disease [9]. Furthermore, these abnormalities might change with body mass index (BMI) because thyroid hormones are involved in the regulation of various metabolic pathways (e.g., adaptive thermogenesis and glucose metabolism) that are relevant for resting energy expenditure and changes in body weight [10, 11].

Worldwide, obesity has increased to epidemic proportions in recent years. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2014, 40% of women over age 18 years were obese and 15% were overweight [12]. By 2016, in Mexico, 37% of women older than 20 years were overweight, and the prevalence of obesity was 38.6% [13]. Obesity has been linked to various chronic diseases and to the development of different types of cancer, including BC [14]. One study indicated that if the BMI had remained at 1982 levels, nearly a quarter (118,000 cases) of all obesity-related cancers in 2012 could have been avoided worldwide [15].

Obesity, as measured by BMI, has been associated with BC risk, but conflicting effects have been reported in premenopausal and postmenopausal women [1619]. In premenopausal women, BMI is associated with decreased BC risk [2027], whereas in postmenopausal women, it has been associated with an increased BC risk [2830]. Recently, genetically predicted BMI was inversely associated with BC risk in both, premenopausal and postmenopausal women [31]. The mechanisms behind these associations have not been fully explained [27]. Several metabolic conditions associated with body fat can influence the BC risk differently in premenopausal and postmenopausal women [27, 32].

In a cohort study conducted in Swedish women, Tosovic et al. (2012) reported a positive association between serum concentrations of free T4 (FT4) and BC prior to diagnosis, particularly in women with a BMI ≥ 25, while for free T3 (FT3), the protective effect was higher in women with BMI < 25; however, most of the associations were not statistically significant [1]. White adipose tissue actively produces various hormones and cytokines (e.g., leptin and growth factors, among others) [33], which are important in the homeostasis and regulation of thyroid hormones [34]. Several studies in euthyroid women have reported that serum free thyroxine (FT4) concentration is inversely correlated with BMI [3537], while FT3 has been positively associated with visceral fat [38, 39] and BMI ≥ 40 [40], negatively with body fat measured using bioimpedance [41], and not correlated with BMI [36].

In the present case-control study, we examined the association between serum concentrations of thyroid hormones and BC in 2074 Mexican women who participated in the Cáncer de Mama (CAMA) study. We also examined obesity as an effect modifier of this relationship in premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

Methods

Study population

The present study is derived from the population-based case-control study “Risk factors for BC in Mexico: mammographic patterns, C-peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study” (CAMA), which was conducted in three cities of Mexico (Monterrey, Veracruz, and Mexico City) from January 2004 to December 2007 [42]. In summary, the CAMA study included consecutive women with incident BC (cases (n = 1000)), aged 35–69 years, who were required to have had a minimum of 5 years of residency in the study cities and who were recruited from 12 public hospitals (5 from the Mexican Social Security Institute (Instituto Mexicano de Seguro Social – IMSS), 2 from the Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers (Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores de Estado – ISSSTE), and 5 from the Ministry of Health (Secretaría de Salud – SS)). Nurses from the field staff were based at each hospital Monday to Friday from January 2004 to December 2007. The inclusion criteria for the cases were (a) histopathological confirmation of BC (median of 3 days between diagnosis and inclusion in the study); (b) no previous treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or antiestrogens) in the last 6 months; and (c) absence of pregnancy. The response rate of patients with BC was 94%. Controls (n = 1074) were selected based on a probabilistic multistage design and were randomly selected considering the catchment area of each of the participating hospitals. Mammography was performed and women with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) categories I and II were included in the study. The response rate of controls was 87%. The control group was matched to the patients according to quinquennial age, health institution affiliation, and state of residence. In-person interviews were conducted at the hospital with the patients and at the homes of the controls to obtain information on their sociodemographics, reproductive health, breast pathology, lifestyle, and co-morbidities. Information on the perception of body image in different stages of life (six stages) was also included. The perception was measured with the use of six pictograms that represent silhouettes from very thin to very obese. In both the patients and the controls, blood samples and anthropometric measurements were obtained at participating hospitals by personnel following standardized procedures and  who were blinded to the study hypotheses. For the analyses of the present study, out of 1000 cases and 1070 controls we excluded 50 and 45 women, respectively, because they answered “yes” to the question “Has a doctor diagnosed you with thyroid disease?” In the remaining 950 cases and 1029 controls, we determined serum thyroid hormone concentrations in a random subsample of 645 cases, among whom 3 % had in situ BC, and 697 controls (Fig. 1). Characteristics (e.g., age, residence, breastfeeding, first-degree BC family history, BMI, and parity) of the subsample and the total population from the CAMA study were not statistically different (data not shown).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Selection from the study participants: the CAMA study, Mexico 2004–2007. A flow diagram is presented to explain the selection procedures of the participants

Blood measurements

Blood samples were obtained from the participants after they had fasted for at least 8 h. The samples were centrifuged at 3200 rpm at room temperature for 15 min, and the serum was separated and maintained at − 20 °C for 3 weeks and then at − 80 °C until use. Total concentrations of total T3 (TT3), total T4 (TT4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroglobulin (Tg), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) and thyroglobulin (Tg) antibodies (TgAb) were determined in triplicate using a chemiluminescence assay in a Beckman Coulter UniCel DxI 800 system (Brea, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coefficients of intra-assay and inter-assay variation were less than 6% for the hormones TT3, TT4, TSH, and Tg. In addition, at the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute, 106 ancestry information markers were genotyped using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Sequenom’s unique baseline extension methodology (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The details of these markers have been published elsewhere [43, 44]. The laboratory personnel who performed the measurements were blinded to the condition (case or control) of each participant.

Anthropometric measurements

In order to obtain high-quality body measurements, trained nurses were assessed for intra-observer and inter-observer reliability until consistent and accurate anthropometric measurements were obtained. We used validated and standardized protocols and calibrated instruments according to Lohaman’s recommendations [45]. Weight was measured using a digital scale (Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL, USA) and recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg. Height was measured using a stadiometer (SECA, Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest millimeter. Waist circumference was measured at the level of the navel with the patient in standing position, and the hip circumference was measured at the most prominent level of the buttocks with the woman in a standing position. The BMI was calculated as the weight (in kilograms) divided by the height (in meters) squared. The waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing the waist circumference (in centimeters) by the hip circumference (in centimeters). The cutoff points used to estimate the association for BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, and WHR were established according to the distribution of control patients into tertiles, while the cases were assigned according to the controls’ cutoff points. Tertiles were used for the anthropometric variables because Mexican women are mostly in the overweight and obesity categories. In addition, the participating women were asked to select the silhouette that best represented their body shape (using six pictograms that represent body shape from very thin to extremely obese) at different stages of their lives (before and immediately after menarche, between 18 and 20 years of age, before their first pregnancy, between 25 and 35 years, and their current body shape at the time of the interview). The correlation between BMI and silhouette has been reported as 0.67 in adult women [46], and in the study population, the correlation was p = 0.69 (p ≤ 0.001). A trajectory analysis based on a group approach was performed as proposed by Nagin [47]; this approach is based on the identification of groups with different individual trajectories in the study population over time and looks for the most homogeneous clusters. To identify the optimal model (number of groups and trajectories), we used the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) [47, 48]. To place enough subjects in each category for the statistical analysis, the body shape silhouettes were combined into categories. At childhood, at adolescence, at age 18–20 years, and at age before first pregnancy, the thin category included the women who selected silhouette 1. Silhouette 2 was included for the median category, and for obesity, the women who selected silhouettes 3, 4, 5, and 6 were included. For body silhouettes of women aged 25–35 years and for their current body silhouette, the thin category included the women who selected silhouette 1 and 2. Silhouette 3 was included for the median category, and for obesity, the women who selected silhouettes 4, 5, and 6 were included [48].

Diet

A semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) adapted from Willett [49] to the Mexican population and validated in Mexico City [49, 50] was used for the present study. To measure caloric consumption, participants were asked to report frequency of consumption of a typical serving of 104 items in the past year, and responses were converted to average daily consumption. To calculate intakes, we used the nutrient database developed by the National Institute of Nutrition in Mexico [51] and, when necessary, the US Department of Agriculture food composition tables [52].

Physical activity

To measure physical activity, a semi-structured interview to estimate an individual’s time spent performing different physical activities (sleep and light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity physical activity) was applied. The interview was based on the 7-day recall questionnaire proposed by Sallis et al. (1985) [53]. For the present study, weekly hours of moderate-intensity physical activity (activities that are tiresome but that do not result in breathlessness) were used. The patients were asked to report physical activity in a typical week 1 year before the appearance of signs and symptoms, to reduce the possibility of reverse causation bias, whereas the controls were asked to report physical activity for the year prior to the survey [42].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics (medians, interquartile ranges, means, SD and proportions) were calculated for both the premenopausal and postmenopausal women who were categorized as either cases or controls. We described sociodemographic, reproductive health, anthropometry, breast pathology, lifestyle, comorbidities, thyroid function parameters and clinical characteristics of the patients (cases) in terms of clinical stage (early ≤ IIA; advanced ≥ IIB) and histological grade (1, 2, or 3).

To assess the association between BC and TT3 or TT4 serum concentrations, two logistic regression models were used, one for premenopausal and one for postmenopausal women. To build each model, bivariate models were constructed for each variable of interest and potential confounders, then variables with a p value ≤0.20 in the bivariate models were included in each final model. In order to build the most parsimonious models that still explain the data, we left the variables with a p value <0.05 [54, 55]. The dependent variable was BC (yes/no), and the independent variables of interest were TT3 and TT4, which were incorporated into the models as standardized continuous variables (Z = (x-μ)/σ). For each model, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were obtained. For continuous variables such as thyroid function parameters and calorie consumption, we estimated the odds of BC for each increase in SD.

The following are the variables that were considered as potential confounders: (a) sociodemographic variables: age (years), entitlement to a health institution (IMSS, ISSSTE, and Ministry of Health), city of residence (Mexico City, Monterrey, or Veracruz), economic index (low, medium, or high), and educational level (last complete school grade); (b) reproductive health: age at menarche (years), age at menopause (years), time of exposure to endogenous hormones (age at menopause in years to age of menarche in years), parity (number of children born alive), ever use of hormonal contraception (yes/no), age at first full-term pregnancy (years), use of hormones for menopause for more than 1 month (yes/no), and breastfeeding (months); (c) anthropometric measurements: height (cm); (d) breast pathology: personal history of benign breast disease (yes/no) and family history of BC (mother, grandmother, or sisters) (yes/no); (e) lifestyles: hours of moderate-intensity physical activity per week [42, 53], alcohol consumption (consumed on average one or more alcoholic drinks a month for a year (yes/no)), tobacco consumption (smoked at least 100 cigarettes in her lifetime (yes/no), and daily calorie intake (Kcal) [4952, 56]; (f) percentage of indigenous ancestry informative markers [44, 57]; (g) comorbidities: diabetes mellitus diagnosed by a physician (yes/no); and (h) the other thyroid function parameters: TSH, Tg, and Tg and thyroperoxidase TPO antibodies (TPO Ab) (Z = (x-μ)/σ). The percentage of ancestry informative markers was considered as a potential confounder due to its potential association with the thyroid hormone profile [57] and because it has been associated with BC [44].

The effect modification of obesity (BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, WHR, and trajectories according to the silhouettes) was assessed for the association between TT3 or TT4 and BC in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Multiplicative interactions were evaluated, which considered the thyroid hormones as continuous variables, the anthropometric variables in tertiles (waist circumference (tertiles), hip circumference (tertiles), BMI (tertiles), WHR (tertiles)), and the different trajectories of weight change (constantly low, constantly mid-range, moderate increase, strong increase, or constantly high). We focus our results on the potential effect modification by BMI since this variable has been associated more consistently as a protector against BC in premenopausal women and as a risk factor in postmenopausal women [23, 5879]. The results for the rest of the anthropometric variables are presented in additional tables. Given that missing values were lower than 5%, we did not include them in the analysis of multiple models. All models were then analyzed with goodness of fit, model specification, collinearity, and influential values tests according to the procedure proposed by Hosmer and Lemeshow [55]. The analysis was performed using the STATA v13 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

The characteristics of the study population are presented separately for premenopausal and postmenopausal women in Table 1. Compared to controls, premenopausal patients (cases), were more likely to have completed professional and postgraduate studies (data not shown). Among postmenopausal women, a higher percentage of patients completed secondary, high school, and postgraduate studies compared with the controls (data not shown). Parity, history of benign breast disease, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and history of diabetes mellitus are associated with BC according to the literature. In both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, waist circumference and hip circumference were smaller in the patients than in the controls. BMI was lower in the patients than in the controls. Table 2, shows that in both the premenopausal and postmenopausal women, the serum TT3 concentration was lower in the patients than in the controls, whereas the serum TT4 concentration was higher in the patients than in the controls. Table 3, shows that more than 40% of the study participants were diagnosed at an advanced clinical stage.
Table 1

Characteristics of study participants by menopausal status in the CAMA study, Mexico, 2004–2007

 

Premenopausal women, n = 306

Postmenopausal women, n = 1036

Cases, n = 147

Controls, n = 159

Cases, n = 498

Controls, n = 538

Number

(%)a

Number

(%)a

Number

(%)a

Number

(%)a

Sociodemographic

 Age (years)b

44.1

38.6–47.3

44.1

40.6–47.8

58.0

52.9–64.3

57.4

52.3–62.1

 Wealth index

  Low

52

(35.4)

45

(28.3)

155

(31.1)

199

(37.0)

  Medium

38

(25.9)

49

(30.8)

125

(25.1)

187

(34.8)

  High

57

(38.8)

65

(40.9)

218

(43.8)

152

(28.3)

Indigenous ancestry percent

 0–25%

3

(2.0)

4

(2.5)

21

(4.2)

10

(1.9)

 26–50%

38

(25.9)

41

(25.8)

130

(26.1)

125

(23.2)

 51–75%

49

(33.3)

77

(48.4)

188

(37.8)

245

(45.5)

 76–100%

18

(12.2)

33

(20.8)

79

(15.9)

139

(25.8)

Reproductive health

 Time of exposure to endogenous hormones (years)b

   

34

30–37

34

29–37

 Parity

  None

21

(14.3)

13

(8.2)

62

(12.4)

23

(4.3)

  1–3

93

(63.3)

98

(61.6)

227

(45.6)

209

(38.8)

   ≥ 4

32

(21.8)

47

(29.6)

205

(41.2)

306

(56.9)

 Use of contraception at any point at life

  No

85

(57.8)

86

(54.1)

294

(59.0)

299

(55.6)

  Yes

62

(42.2)

73

(45.9)

202

(40.6)

239

(44.4)

 Use of hormones for menopause for more than 1 month

  No

380

(76.3)

456

(84.8)

  Yes

114

(22.9)

81

(15.1)

 Breastfeeding in monthsb

9

2–25

12

4–34

12

1–42

24

6–57

Anthropometry

 Waist circumference (cm)b,c

93.3

84.8 - 101.5

97.7

92–107.0

97.0

90.3–104.8

99.5

91.65–108.0

 Hip circumference (cm)b,c

103.1

97.2 - 111.0

107.9

102 - 115.7

106.25

100.3–114.6

108.0

101–117.0

 Height (cm)b,c

154.5

150.5 - 158.5

153.8

149.7 - 158.0

151.8

147.3–156.0

150.5

146.7–154.4

 Weight (kg)b,c

65.8

59.5 - 74.2

70.2

64.0–79.6

67.2

60.2–76.6

67.8

60.4–77.4

 Body mass index (weight in kg/height squared)b,c

27.4

24.9–31.5

29.8

27.1–33.4

29.2

26.4–33.2

30.2

27.1–33.8

 Waist-hip ratiob,c

0.90

0.86–0.94

0.91

0.87–0.95

0.91

0.87–0.96

0.91

0.87–0.97

Silhouette trajectory

 Group 1, constantly low

19

(12.9)

28

(17.6)

76

(15.3)

94

(17.5)

 Group 2, constantly mid-range

57

(38.8)

56

(35.2)

199

(40.0)

200

(37.2)

 Group 3, moderate increase

27

(18.4)

32

(20.1)

101

(20.3)

117

(21.7)

 Group 4, Strong increase

41

(27.9)

37

(23.3)

104

(20.9)

113

(21.0)

 Group 5, constantly high

3

(2.0)

6

(3.8)

18

(3.6)

14

(2.6)

Breast pathology

 Personal history of benign breast disease

  No

126

(85.7)

140

(88.1)

425

(85.3)

506

(94.1)

  Yes

20

(13.6)

16

(10.1)

65

(13.1)

27

(5.0)

 Family history of breast cancer (mother, grandmother, and sisters)

  No

137

(93.2)

148

(93.1)

466

(93.6)

525

(97.6)

  Yes

10

(6.8)

11

(6.9)

32

(6.4)

13

(2.4)

Lifestyle

 Hours of moderate-intensity physical activity per weekb,d

9.0

3.5–18.0

12.0

2.0–25.5

5.5

1.0–10.5

12.0

2.0–22.0

 Consumed on average one or more alcoholic drinks a month for a year

  No

108

(73.5)

139

(87.4)

403

(80.9)

472

(87.7)

  Yes

39

(26.5)

18

(11.3)

70

(14.1)

47

(8.7)

 Smoked at least 100 cigarettes in her lifetime

 No

119

(81.0)

113

(71.1)

370

(74.3)

442

(82.2)

 Yes

28

(19.0)

46

(28.9)

128

(25.7)

96

(17.8)

 Daily total consumption of calories (Kcal)b,d

2262.6

1776.1 - 2704.1

1853.0

1514.8–2302.6

2014.9

1631.1–2557.1

1748.5

1396.0–2160.4

Comorbidities

 Diagnosed with diabetes mellitus by a physician

  No

123

(84.4)

130

(82.4)

330

(66.3)

399

(74.2)

  Yes

15

(10.2)

18

(11.3)

126

(25.3)

107

(19.9)

CAMA study Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns, C peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study

aPercentages do not necessarily add up to 100% due to missing values

bValues correspond to the median and interquartile range

cMissing values in percentage: waist: premenopausal women: cases 0%, controls 3.1%; postmenopausal women: cases 3.8%, controls 1.9%; height: premenopausal women: cases 2%, controls 0%; postmenopausal women: cases 0%, controls 0%; body mass index: premenopausal women: cases 2%, controls 0%; postmenopausal women: cases 0%, controls 0%; waist-to-hip ratio: premenopausal women: cases 2.0%, controls 3.1%; postmenopausal women: cases 3.8%, controls 2.0%

dMissing values: hours of moderate-intensity physical activity per week: premenopausal women: cases 0%, controls 0%; postmenopausal women: cases 0.2%, controls 0%; daily total consumption of calories (Kcal): premenopausal women: cases 10.9%, controls 10.1%; postmenopausal women cases 5.6%, controls 7,6%

Table 2

Thyroid function parameters of study participants by menopausal status in the CAMA study, Mexico, 2004–2007

 

Premenopausal women, n = 306

Postmenopausal women, n = 1036

Cases, n = 147

Controls, n = 159

Cases, n = 498

Controls, n = 538

Median

Interquartile range

Median

Interquartile range

Median

Interquartile range

Median

Interquartile range

Thyroid function parameters

 Total triiodotyronine (TT3) nmol/La

1.6

1.3–1.9

2.4

1.9–2.8

1.7

1.4–2.1

2.6

2.1–3.0

  Mean (SD)

1.7

0.5

2.4

0.6

1.8

0.7

2.6

0.6

 Total thyroxin (TT4) nmol/La

103.4

87.4–123.1

93.1

83.7–109.7

104.6

89.8–122.3

96.7

84.4–112.2

  Mean (SD)

107.3

27.3

97.2

22

108.6

29.5

100.5

25.7

 TSH μUI/mLa

1.6

1.1–2.1

1.7

1.1–2.3

1.8

1.1–2.8

1.8

1.1–2.9

  Mean (SD)

1.8

1.4

2.3

3.3

2.9

9.6

2.9

6.8

 Thyroglobulin ng/mLa

6.4

4.0–10.2

7.1

4.5–12.2

7.4

3.9–14.5

7.4

4.0–14.5

  Mean (SD)

8.9

9.3

9.9

10.9

17.8

70.1

15.9

47.1

 Anti-peroxidase antibodies UI/mLb

0.1

0.5–2.5

1.10

0.6–3.1

1.1

0.6–3.9

1.1

0.6–3.5

  Mean (SD)

46.4

266.2

222.3

1373.8

111.1

444.6

95.0

346.3

 Anti-thyroglobulin antibodiesb,c

  Negative

73

(49.7)

59

(37.1)

135

(27.1)

133

(24.7)

  Positive

71

(48.3)

100

(62.9)

221

(44.4)

240

(44.6)

   Median UI/mL (interquartile range)d

0.9

0.3–3.1

1.0

0.04–3.0

1.0

0.3–4.6

0.8

0.4–2.8

Mean (SD)d

17.7

106.4

4.7

9.8

23.1

165.1

14.4

102.4

CAMA study Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns, C peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study, TSH thyroid stimulating hormone

aThere are no missing values for TT3, TT4, TSH and thyroglobulin

bResults correspond to 147 cases and 159 controls (premenopausal women), respectively; and to 356 cases and 373 controls (postmenopausal)

cNumber and (percentage) of women with negative/positive anti-thyroglobulin antibodies

dThe values correspond to women with positive results for anti-thyroglobulin antibodies

Table 3

Clinical characteristics of patients with breast cancer (cases) by menopausal status in the CAMA study, Mexico, 2004–2007

 

Premenopausal cases, n = 147

Premenopausal cases, n = 498

Number

Percentagea

Number

Percentagea

Clinical characteristics

 Clinical stage

  Early (≤ IIA)

43

(29.3)

175

(35.1)

  Advanced (≥ IIB)

73

(49.7)

206

(41.4)

 Histological grade

  1

4

(2.7)

8

(1.6)

  2

29

(19.7)

108

(21.7)

  3

9

(6.1)

49

(9.8)

CAMA study Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns,

C peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study

aPercentages do not add up to 100% due to missing values

In the premenopausal women who were stratified by tertiles of the anthropometric variables (BMI, waist and hip measurements, and WHR), the median serum TT3 concentration was lower in the patients than in the controls, whereas TT4 concentrations were higher in the patients than in the controls, and serum TSH concentrations were similar in both groups. The same relationship was observed in postmenopausal women (data not shown).

Multiple models, minimally adjusted for age, health institution, and city of residence, showed that when all the women were analyzed, the serum concentration of the TT3 hormone was negatively associated with BC (OR per standard deviation = 0.16, 95% CI 0.13–0.20), and this association was maintained when the patients were stratified into the premenopausal (OR per standard deviation = 0.07, 95% CI 0.04–0.12) and postmenopausal groups (OR per standard deviation = 0.20, 95% CI 0.16–0.25) (data not shown). However, the protective effect was much higher in premenopausal than in postmenopausal women. The association between serum TT4 concentration and BC was positive when all the women were analyzed (OR per standard deviation = 1.71, 95% CI 1.48–1.98), and this association was maintained when the patients were stratified by menopausal status; however, stronger association was seen in premenopausal women (OR per standard deviation = 1.97, 95% CI 1.38–2.82) compared with postmenopausal women (OR per standard deviation = 1.71, 95% CI 1.48–1.98) (data not shown). No significant associations were found with any other thyroid function parameters (TSH, Tg, Tg Ab, or TPO Ab).

Table 4 presents the multiple model stratified by menopausal status, adjusted by BMI and Table 5 presents the models stratified by both menopausal status and BMI. In Table 4, a negative association was observed between the serum TT3 concentration and BC in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women, and a positive association was observed between the serum TT4 concentration and BC. The association was stronger in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women for both hormones. These associations were similar when each of the remaining anthropometric variables and the trajectory of the silhouettes were independently adjusted (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Table 4

Associations between thyroid function tests and breast cancer adjusted by BMI in the CAMA study, Mexico, 2004–2007

 

Premenopausal womena

Postmenopausal womenb

case/control

OR

95% CI

case/control

OR

95% CI

TT3c

128/142

0.03

0.01–0.07

382/498

0.17

0.13–0.22

TT4c

 

5.98

3.01–11.90

 

2.81

2.17–3.65

BMI

 Tertile 1 (BMI < 27.88)

67/47

1.00

 

145/166

1.00

 

 Tertile 2 (BMI 27.88–32.05)

35/48

0.56

0.23–1.37

106/168

0.98

0.63–1.52

 Tertile 3 (BMI ≥ 32.06)

26/47

0.28

0.11–0.75

131/164

1.16

0.75–1.80

CAMA study Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns, C peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study. TT3 total triiodothyroxine, TT4 total thyroxine, BMI body mass index

aLogistic regression model in premenopausal women: dependent variable, breast cancer (yes/no); independent variables, TT3 (nmol/L) and TT4 (nmol/L); potential confounders, age (years), city of residence (Mexico City (reference category), Veracruz and Monterrey), health institution (IMSS: Mexican Social Security Institute (reference category); ISSSTE: Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers; SS: Ministry of Health), daily total consumption of calories (Kcal) and BMI (tertiles). Hormone concentrations and calorie consumption were standardized to allow interpretation of the odds of breast cancer development per increment of standard deviation, Z = (x-μ)/σ

bLogistic model in postmenopausal women: dependent variable, breast cancer (yes/no); independent variables, TT3 (nmol/L) and TT4 (nmol/L); potential confounders: age (years), city of residence (Mexico City (reference category), Veracruz and Monterrey), health institution (IMSS: Mexican Social Security Institute (reference category); ISSSTE: Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers; SS: Ministry of Health), thyroid stimulating hormone (continuous), parity (continuous), consumed on average one or more alcoholic drinks a month for a year (yes/no) and smoked at least 100 cigarettes in her lifetime (yes/no), indigenous ancestry (continuous) and BMI (tertiles). Hormone concentrations and calorie consumption were standardized to allow interpretation of the odds of breast cancer development per increment of standard deviation, Z = (x-μ)/σ

cTT3 (mean 1.7 SD 0.5); TT4 (mean 103.4 SD 27.3)

Table 5

Association between thyroid function tests and breast cancer modified by obesity in the CAMA study, Mexico, 2004–2007

 

Premenopausal womena

Postmenopausal womenb

Case/control

OR

95% CI

Case/control

OR

95% CI

Multiple model stratified by BMI tertiles

 Tertile 1 (BMI < 27.88)

67/47

  

145/166

  

  TT3c

 

0.02

0.003–0.09

 

0.18

0.11–0.28

  TT4c

 

11.97

3.43–41.80

 

2.62

1.67–4.09

 Tertile 2 (BMI 27.88–32.05)

35/48

  

106/168

  

  TT3c

 

0.04

0.0 –0.16

 

0.15

0.09–0.25

  TT4c

 

8.34

2.03–34.24

 

3.03

1.83–5.02

 Tertile 3 (BMI ≥ 32.06)

26/47

  

131/164

  

  TT3c

 

0.01

0.0004–0.08

 

0.10

0.06–0.18

  TT4c

 

2.23

0.39–12.66

 

3.52

2.15–5.75

p value for interaction between TT4 and BMI tertiles

 

0.22

  

0.059

p value for interaction between TT3 and BMI tertiles

 

0.12

  

0.34

CAMA study Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns, peptide C, and growth factors, a multicenter study, BMI body mass index, TT3 total triiodothyroxine, TT4 total thyroxine

aLogistic regression model in premenopausal women: dependent variable, breast cancer (yes/no); independent variables, TT3 (nmol/L) and TT4 (nmol/L); potential confounders, age (years), city of residence (Mexico City (reference category) Veracruz and Monterrey), health institution (IMSS: Mexican Social Security Institute (reference category); ISSSTE: Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers; SS: Ministry of Health), daily total consumption of calories (Kcal). Models are presented by each tertile of BMI. Hormone concentrations and calorie consumption were standardized to allow interpretation of the odds of breast cancer development per increment of standard deviation, Z = (x-μ)/σ

bLogistic regression model in postmenopausal women: dependent variable, breast cancer (yes/no); independent variables, TT3 (nmol/L) and TT4 (nmol/L); potential confounders: age (years), city of residence (Mexico City (reference category) Veracruz and Monterrey), health institution (IMSS: Mexican Social Security Institute (reference category); ISSSTE: Institute of Security and Social Services of State Workers; SS: Ministry of Health), thyroid stimulating hormone (continuous), parity (continuous), consumed on average one or more alcoholic drinks a month for a year (yes/no) and smoked at least 100 cigarettes in her lifetime (yes/no) and indigenous ancestry (continuous). Models are presented by each tertile of BMI. Hormone concentrations and calorie consumption were standardized to allow interpretation of the odds of breast cancer development per increment of standard deviation, Z = (x-μ)/σ

cTT3 (mean 1.7 SD 0.5); TT4 (mean 103.4 SD 27.3)

When premenopausal women were stratified by BMI (Table 5), it was observed that the association between the serum concentration of TT4 and BC decreased as BMI tertiles increased, until they were no longer significant in the upper tertile (p of interaction = 0.22), while the protective effect of the serum TT3 concentration was maintained in the three tertiles (p of interaction = 0.12). Similarly, the effects of the serum concentrations of TT3 and TT4 were evaluated based on the remainder of the anthropometric variables, and waist circumference (p = 0.887), hip circumference (p = 0.291), WHR (p = 0.381), and the silhouettes trajectory variable (p = 0.52) were not statistically significant (Additional file 1: Table S2). In postmenopausal women, stratification by BMI showed that the association between the serum TT4 concentration and BC increased as the BMI tertiles increased (p of interaction = 0.059) (Table 5). For the other anthropometric variables, potential effect modification was observed with hip circumference (tertile 1, OR = 2.17, CI 1.34–3.50; tertile 2, OR = 3.58. CI 2.16–5.95; tertile 3, OR = 3.47, CI 2.12–5.68, p of interaction = 0.02), with WHR (tertile 1, OR = 2.97, CI 1.84–4.80; tertile 2, OR = 4.43. CI 2.38–8.27; tertile 3, OR = 2.46, CI 1.60–3.80, p of interaction = 0.02), and with the silhouettes trajectory (constantly low, OR = 3.87, CI 1.72–8.73; constantly mid-range, OR = 2.12, CI 1.44–3.13; moderately increased, OR = 2.53, CI 1.37–4.66; strong increase, OR = 4.57, CI 2.38–8.86, p of interaction = 0.02), but an effect modification was not observed with waist circumference (p of interaction = 0.51). The interactions between the serum TT3 concentration and the anthropometric variables were also evaluated, but these were not statistically significant for BMI (p = 0.34), hip circumference (p = 0.49), waist circumference (p = 0.74), WHR (p = 0.38), or the silhouettes trajectory (p = 0.36) (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Discussion

The addition of T4 to BC-derived cell lines has been shown to increase cell proliferation [3], while in the presence of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive BC cell lines the addition of T3 inhibits cell proliferation [7]. These effects are important, as abnormalities in thyroid function tests have been observed in a variety of nonthyroidal illness, without preexisting thyroid or hypothalamic-pituitary disease, including BC [80]. These abnormalities might change by BMI because thyroid hormones are involved in the regulation of various metabolic pathways that are relevant for resting energy expenditure [10, 11]. They could also change by menopausal status because obesity has been negatively associated with BC in premenopausal women [2027] and has been positively associated with BC in postmenopausal women [30]. It is important to assess the modifying effect of obesity in this association because of the implications for treatment in populations in where the prevalence of obesity and thyroid dysfunction is high.

We analyzed the association between thyroid hormones and BC and the modification effects of general obesity (BMI), central or intra-abdominal obesity (waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-hip ratio), and trajectories of change in body shape. Initially, we observed that in both the premenopausal and postmenopausal women, the serum TT4 concentration was positively associated with BC, whereas the serum TT3 concentration was inversely associated with BC. These associations were stronger in the premenopausal women. When the premenopausal women were stratified by BMI tertiles, the positive association between the serum TT4 concentration and BC decreased as the BMI tertiles increased; this association was no longer statistically significant in the highest tertile, probably due to the smaller sample size. In contrast, for the postmenopausal women in the highest tertile of BMI, the strength of the association between the serum TT4 concentration and BC was increased.

A possible explanation for our findings could be related to the difference between premenopausal and postmenopausal women with respect to the possibility or risk of the development of ER-negative (ER-) BC due to BMI [81] and due to the finding that the maintenance of increased cell proliferation caused by T4 requires ER function [82]. Studies that have investigated the association between BMI and different molecular subtypes have suggested that in premenopausal women with a BMI ≥ 25, the prevalence of luminal tumors (ER positive (ER+) or progesterone receptor-positive (PR+)), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive or negative (HER2+ or HER2-) and triple-negative tumors (ER-, PR-, HER2-) is higher than in those with a BMI < 25 [83]. Harris et al. (2011) consistently showed that in this same group of women, the risk of development of ER- BC was higher in those in the upper quintiles of waist and hip circumference and of WHR than in those in the lower quintile [27]. In contrast, in postmenopausal women, compared with women with a BMI < 25, the possibility of the development of luminal BC was greater in those with a BMI ≥ 25 [83]. Additionally, a pooled analysis of 35,568 women with invasive BC who participated in 34 studies showed that in those ≤ 50 years of age, the likelihood of observing ER- tumors was higher in obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) than in women who were not obese (BMI < 25 kg/m2), and this association was statistically significant [81]. This same association was not statistically significant in women > 50 years of age [81].

Tang et al. observed that both the T4 hormone and 17β-estradiol (E2) promoted cell proliferation through the stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway by ER and demonstrated that such proliferation requires ER function to be sustained [82]. In several cell models, it has been observed that at physiological concentrations, T4 is more active than T3 at stimulating the MAPK pathway [8487]. In premenopausal women, the decrease in the association between TT4 and BC with increasing BMI could be explained by the lower prevalence of ER+ tumors in overweight and obese women [88, 89]. In contrast, in postmenopausal women, the increase in the association between T4 and BC with increasing BMI may be explained by the finding that overweight and obese women are at a greater risk of the development of ER+ breast tumors. However, more studies need to be performed stratifying by menopausal status and BMI. Two cohort studies reported a positive association between the serum T4 concentration and BC. However, in the aforementioned studies no effect modification was assessed for BMI and menopausal status [1, 90].

In our study we observed a negative association between serum TT3 and BC in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. On the other hand, we did not observe an effect modification of this association by BMI. In addition, our results are consistent with previously published studies. For example, in studies of ER- cell lines that were transfected with ER, T3 inhibited cell proliferation [7]. Also, Tosovic et al., reported a non-statistically significant negative association between serum T3 and BC, independently of menopausal status [1]. That group also observed a negative association when women were stratified by menopausal status and BMI; however, it was not statistically significant [1].

The findings that we report need to be interpreted within the context of certain limitations. The number of premenopausal women was not sufficient for the identification of a statistically significant effect modification by BMI or other obesity measurements; moreover, the confidence intervals after stratification were broad, particularly for other anthropometric measurements that are presented in additional tables. Given the characteristics of Mexican women, among whom more than 70% were overweight and obese, it was not possible to use the cutoff points proposed by the WHO for anthropometric measurements; hence, we stratified the controls by tertiles for each measurement. Our study personnel were trained to measure weight and height and the other anthropometric variables using a standardized approach in both cases and controls, and in the cases, the measurements were performed at the time of the diagnosis. As BMI can be modified by the presence of cancer, this study is not free of reverse causality. However, the median number of days from the diagnosis until the women entered the study and the anthropometric variables were determined was 3 days. Additionally, we measured TT4. Free T4 (FT4) is unbound and is the active component of TT4, therefore further studies should be performed using FT4. Approximately 75% of the T4 in serum is bound to thyroid-binding globulin (TBG), and a smaller fraction is bound to transthyretin or albumin; so less than 0.1% remains free or unbound [91]. Given that postmenopausal hormone therapy and the use of hormonal contraceptives at any point in life lead to increased thyroid binding globulin (TBG) binding capacity [92], we considered adjusting for these variables in our models. However, we did not include them in the final models because they did not confound our main results. We did not include the ER status because when recruiting the patients (cases), ER status was not determined in all women. Tosovic et al., (2014) found statistically significant positive associations between higher pre-diagnostic T3 concentration and negative ER status [93]. However, further analysis needs to be performed because the sample size was very small and they did not adjust or stratify by BMI.

Our findings are congruent with previously observed altered T3 and T4 measurements in diseases such as BC [9]. In those circumstances, there is dysregulation of thyrotrophic feedback control [9], in which T3 and/or T4 are at unusual levels, but the thyroid gland does not appear to be dysfunctional. Thus, the lower levels of T3 and higher levels of T4 in BC cases may be due to the effect of BC on thyroid function rather than T3 and T4 acting as risk factors for BC. If so, these findings may still be of interest to understand whether the levels of T3 and T4 could be related to tumor stage or have other implications for prognosis.

Our findings need to be replicated in other studies, including those with larger sample sizes and to investigate other possible mechanisms by which the association between T4 and BC is potentially modified by BMI in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. In particular, prospective cohort studies in which T3 and T4 are collected prior to cancer diagnosis may be helpful in understanding the causal relationship between BC and thyroid hormones. In addition, a prospective study may also help to improve understanding of the relationship among thyroid hormones, BC, and obesity.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that has evaluated the effect modification by BMI of the relationship between thyroid hormones and BC, both in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The results of the present study open a new line of research with which to evaluate the effect modification by obesity of the association between thyroid hormones and BC.

Conclusions

There is a strong association between BC and serum concentrations of TT3 and TT4; the latter differed by BMI and menopausal status. This needs to be further investigated to understand why it happens and how important it is to consider these alterations in treatment.

Abbreviations

BC: 

Breast cancer

bFGF: 

Fibroblast growth factor

BIC: 

Bayesian information criterion

BMI: 

Body mass index

CAMA: 

Risk factors for breast cancer in Mexico: mammographic patterns, C peptide, and growth factors, a multicenter study

E2: 

17β-estradiol

ER: 

Estrogen receptor

FT3: 

Free triiodothyronine

FT4: 

Free thyroxine

HER2: 

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

IMSS: 

Instituto Mexicano de Seguro Social

ISSSTE: 

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

OR: 

Odds ratio

PR: 

Progesterone receptor

RIC: 

Interquartile range

SS: 

Secretariía de Salud

T3: 

Triiodothyronine

T4: 

Thyroxine

TBG: 

Thyroid binding globulin

Tg: 

Thyroglobulin

Tg Ab: 

Thyroglobulin antibodies

TPO Ab: 

Thyroperoxidase antibodies

TSH: 

Thyroid stimulating hormone

TT3: 

Total triiodothyronine

TT4: 

Total thyroxine

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

WHO: 

World Health Organization

WHR: 

Waist-to-hip ratio

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge CONACyT (CONACyT-SALUD-2002 C01-7462) y DGPOP 2011 (Dirección General de Programación Organización y Presupuesto, Ejercicio fiscal 2011, Ramo 12 Salud) for the financial support provided for this work and all physicians responsible for the project in the different participating hospitals: Dr Germán Castelazo (IMSS, Ciudad de México, DF), Dr Sinhué Barroso Bravo (IMSS, Ciudad de México, DF), Dr Joaquín Zarco Méndez (ISSSTE, Ciudad de México, DF), Dr Jesús Pablo Esparza Cano (IMSS, Monterrey, Nuevo León), Dr Heriberto Fabela (IMSS, Monterrey, Nuevo León), Dr Fausto Hernández Morales (ISSSTE, Veracruz, Veracruz), Dr Pedro Coronel Brizio (CECAN SS, Xalapa, Veracruz) and Dr Vicente A Saldaña Quiroz (IMSS, Veracruz, Veracruz).

Funding

This work was funded by the National Council of Science and Technology (grant CONACyT-SALUD-2002 C01-7462) and DGPOP 2011, Dirección General de Programación Organización y Presupuesto, Ejercicio fiscal 2011, Ramo 12 Salud.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

COO and GTM conceived the study, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. COO, GTM, and AALL were involved with collection of data. COO carried out all data analysis. FMR and EPR facilitated the contact with patients. COO, AUA, AALL, FMR, CEGA, MLHB, EZ, LAS, EPR, and GTM were all involved in data interpretation, critical revisions of the manuscript, and approval of the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participants in the study had provided written informed consent and the study was approved by the ethics and research committees of the National Institute of Public Health (Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública) (number CI-349).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institutes of Health; or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Facultad de Enfermería y Nutrición, Niño Artillero #130, Zona Universitaria, C.P. 78240 San Luis Potosí, S.L.P., México
(2)
Red de Apoyo a la Investigación, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, calle Vasco de Quiroga No. 15, Col. Belisario Domínguez Sección XVI, Del. Tlalpan, C.P. 14080 Ciudad de México, México
(3)
Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Av. Universidad No. 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, Cuernavaca, C.P. 62100, Morelos, México
(4)
Hospital de Ginecología y Obstetricia No. 4 Luis Castelazo Ayala, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Avenida Río Magdalena No. 289, Col. Tizapán, San Angel, Ciudad de México, C.P. 01090, México
(5)
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Institute for Human Genetics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
(6)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 1450 3rd St, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
(7)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge, Room 10188, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
(8)
Hospital Universitario “Dr José Eleuterio González”. Madero y Dr. Aguirre Pequeño, Col. Mitras, C.P. 64460 Monterrey, N.L., México
(9)
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Avenida Universidad 655, Col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán, C.P. 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México

References

  1. Tosovic A, Becker C, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Ericsson UB, Malm J, et al. Prospectively measured thyroid hormones and thyroid peroxidase antibodies in relation to breast cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2126–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tosovic A, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Ericsson UB, Malm J, Manjer J. Prospectively measured triiodothyronine levels are positively associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12:R33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis PJ, Goglia F, Leonard JL. Nongenomic actions of thyroid hormone. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:111–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Meng R, Tang HY, Westfall J, London D, Cao JH, Mousa SA, et al. Crosstalk between integrin alphavbeta3 and estrogen receptor-alpha is involved in thyroid hormone-induced proliferation in human lung carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27547.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lin HY, Sun M, Tang HY, Lin C, Luidens MK, Mousa SA, et al. L-thyroxine vs. 3,5,3′-triiodo-L-thyronine and cell proliferation: activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2009;296:C980–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nogueira CR, Brentani MM. Triiodothyronine mimics the effects of estrogen in breast cancer cell lines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;59:271–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cestari SH, Figueiredo NB, Conde SJ, Clara S, Katayama ML, Padovani CR, et al. Influence of estradiol and triiodothyronine on breast cancer cell lines proliferation and expression of estrogen and thyroid hormone receptors. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2009;53:859–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall LC, Salazar EP, Kane SR, Liu N. Effects of thyroid hormones on human breast cancer cell proliferation. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;109:57–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McIver B, Gorman CA. Euthyroid sick syndrome: an overview. Thyroid. 1997;7:125–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Reinehr T. Obesity and thyroid function. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;316:165–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Longhi S, Radetti G. Thyroid function and obesity. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2013;5(Suppl 1):40–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Obesity and overweight. 2018. [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/]. Accessed 19 July 2018.
  13. Hernández Ávila M, Rivera Dommarco J, Shamah Levy T, Cuevas Nasu L, Gómez Acosta L, Gaona Pineda E, Romero Martínez M, Méndez Gómez-Humarán I, Saturno Hernández P, Villalpando Hernández S, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016 (ENSANUT 2016). Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; 2016. http://promocion.salud.gob.mx/dgps/descargas1/doctos_2016/ensanut_mc_2016-310oct.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2018.
  14. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:569–78.Google Scholar
  15. Arnold M, Pandeya N, Byrnes G, Renehan AG, Stevens GA, Ezzati M, et al. Global burden of cancer attributable to high body-mass index in 2012: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:36–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheraghi Z, Poorolajal J, Hashem T, Esmailnasab N, Doosti IA. Effect of body mass index on breast cancer during premenopausal and postmenopausal periods: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51446.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Feng YH. The association between obesity and gynecological cancer. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. 2015;4:102–5.Google Scholar
  18. Picon-Ruiz M, Morata-Tarifa C, Valle-Goffin JJ, Friedman ER, Slingerland JM. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:378–97.Google Scholar
  19. Kyrgiou M, Kalliala I, Markozannes G, Gunter MJ, Paraskevaidis E, Gabra H, et al. Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature. BMJ. 2017;356:j477.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvie M, Hooper L, Howell A. Central obesity and breast cancer risk: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2003;4:157–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Palmer JR, Adams-Campbell LL, Boggs DA, Wise LA, Rosenberg L. A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16:1795–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Slattery ML, Sweeney C, Edwards S, Herrick J, Baumgartner K, Wolff R, et al. Body size, weight change, fat distribution and breast cancer risk in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;102:85–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun S-S, Adami H-O, Beeson L, Folsom AR, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:514–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Berstad P, Coates RJ, Bernstein L, Folger SG, Malone KE, Marchbanks PA, et al. A case-control study of body mass index and breast cancer risk in white and African-American women. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention: a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2010;19:1532–44.Google Scholar
  25. Ng EH, Gao F, Ji CY, Ho GH, Soo KC. Risk factors for breast carcinoma in Singaporean Chinese women: the role of central obesity. Cancer. 1997;80:725–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ogundiran TO, Huo D, Adenipekun A, Campbell O, Oyesegun R, Akang E, et al. Case-control study of body size and breast cancer risk in Nigerian women. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:682–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris H, Willett W, Terry K, Michels K. Body fat distribution and risk of premenopausal breast cancer in the Nurses’ Health Study II. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:273–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. La Vecchia C, Giordano SH, Hortobagyi GN, Chabner B. Overweight, obesity, diabetes, and risk of breast cancer: interlocking pieces of the puzzle. Oncologist. 2011;16:726–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research: Continuous update project report: diet, nutrition, physical activity and breast cancer; 2017.Google Scholar
  30. Chow LWC, Lui KL, Chan JCY, Chan TC, Ho PK, Lee WY, et al. Association between body mass index and risk of formation of breast cancer in Chinese women. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:179–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Guo Y, Warren Andersen S, Shu XO, Michailidou K, Bolla MK, Wang Q, et al. Genetically predicted body mass index and breast cancer risk: Mendelian randomization analyses of data from 145,000 women of European descent. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Amadou A, Hainaut P, Romieu I. Role of obesity in the risk of breast cancer: lessons from anthropometry. J Oncol. 2013;2013:906495.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Trayhurn P. Endocrine and signalling role of adipose tissue: new perspectives on fat. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005;184:285–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ahima RS, Flier JS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000;11:327–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Shon HS, Jung ED, Kim SH, Lee JH. Free T4 is negatively correlated with body mass index in euthyroid women. Korean J Intern Med. 2008;23:53–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Knudsen N, Laurberg P, Rasmussen LB, Bulow I, Perrild H, Ovesen L, et al. Small differences in thyroid function may be important for body mass index and the occurrence of obesity in the population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90:4019–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Makepeace AE, Bremner AP, O'Leary P, Leedman PJ, Feddema P, Michelangeli V, et al. Significant inverse relationship between serum free T4 concentration and body mass index in euthyroid subjects: differences between smokers and nonsmokers. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69:648–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Guan B, Chen Y, Yang J, Yang W, Wang C. Effect of bariatric surgery on thyroid function in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2017;27:3292–305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Nam JS, Cho M, Park JS, Ahn CW, Cha BS, Lee EJ, et al. Triiodothyronine level predicts visceral obesity and atherosclerosis in euthyroid, overweight and obese subjects: T3 and visceral obesity. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2010;4:e247–342.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Montoya-Morales DS, de los Angeles Tapia-Gonzalez M, Alamilla-Lugo L, Sosa-Caballero A, Munoz-Solis A, Jimenez-Sanchez M. Alterations of the thyroid function in patients with morbid obesity. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2015;53(Suppl 1):S18–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar HK, Yadav RK, Prajapati J, Reddy CV, Raghunath M, Modi KD. Association between thyroid hormones, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome. Saudi Med J. 2009;30:907–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Angeles-Llerenas A, Ortega-Olvera C, Perez-Rodriguez E, Esparza-Cano JP, Lazcano-Ponce E, Romieu I, et al. Moderate physical activity and breast cancer risk: the effect of menopausal status. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21:577–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fejerman L, Romieu I, John EM, Lazcano-Ponce E, Huntsman S, Beckman KB, et al. European ancestry is positively associated with breast cancer risk in Mexican women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2010;19:1074–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Fejerman L, John EM, Huntsman S, Beckman K, Choudhry S, Perez-Stable E, et al. Genetic ancestry and risk of breast cancer among U.S. Latinas. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9723–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Books; 1988.Google Scholar
  46. Osuna-Ramírez I, Hernández-Prado B, Campuzano JC, Salmerón J. Indice de masa corporal y percepción de la imagen corporal en una población adulta mexicana: la precisión del autorreporte. Salud Publica Mex. 2006;48:94–103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagin DS. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:139–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Amadou A, Torres Mejia G, Fagherazzi G, Ortega C, Angeles-Llerenas A, Chajes V, et al. Anthropometry, silhouette trajectory, and risk of breast cancer in Mexican women. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46:S52–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hernandez-Avila M, Romieu I, Parra S, Hernandez-Avila J, Madrigal H, Willett W. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake of women living in Mexico City. Salud Publica Mex. 1998;40:133–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Romieu I, Parra S, Hernandez JF, Madrigal H, Willett W, Hernandez M. Questionnaire assessment of antioxidants and retinol intakes in Mexican women. Arch Med Res. 1999;30:224–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morales de León J, Bourges Rodríguez H, Camacho Parra M. Tables of composition of Mexican foods and food products (Condensed version 2015). Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. 2016. http://www.innsz.mx/2017/Tablas/index.html#page/1. Accessed 19 July 2018.
  52. Food Composition Databases. United States Department of Agriculture, Maryland. 2008. https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-researchcenter/nutrient-data-laboratory/docs/usda-national-nutrient-database-for-standard-reference/. Accessed 19 July 2018.
  53. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Wood PD, Fortmann SP, Rogers T, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City project. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;121:91–106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Martinez-González M, Sánchez-Villegas A, Faulin-Fajardo J. Bioestadistica Amigable. 2da ed. España: Diaz de Santos; 2006.Google Scholar
  55. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.Google Scholar
  56. Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Qu HQ, Li Q, Lu Y, Fisher-Hoch SP, McCormick JB. Translational genomic medicine: common metabolic traits and ancestral components of Mexican Americans. J Med Genet. 2012;49:544–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Bruning PF, Bonfrer JM, Hart AA, van Noord PA, van der Hoeven H, Collette HJ, et al. Body measurements, estrogen availability and the risk of human breast cancer: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1992;51:14–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Franceschi S, Favero A, La Vecchia C, Baron AE, Negri E, Dal Maso L, et al. Body size indices and breast cancer risk before and after menopause. Int J Cancer. 1996;67:181–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Harris RE, Namboodiri KK, Wynder EL. Breast cancer risk: effects of estrogen replacement therapy and body mass. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1575–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA. 1997;278:1407–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Kaaks R, Van Noord PA, Den Tonkelaar I, Peeters PH, Riboli E, Grobbee DE. Breast-cancer incidence in relation to height, weight and body-fat distribution in the Dutch “DOM” cohort. Int J Cancer. 1998;76:647–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Lahmann PH, Lissner L, Gullberg B, Olsson H, Berglund G. A prospective study of adiposity and postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Malmo diet and cancer study. Int J Cancer. 2003;103:246–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Michels KB, Terry KL, Willett WC. Longitudinal study on the role of body size in premenopausal breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:2395–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Morimoto LM, White E, Chen Z, Chlebowski RT, Hays J, Kuller L, et al. Obesity, body size, and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: the Women's Health Initiative (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:741–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Sonnenschein E, Toniolo P, Terry MB, Bruning PF, Kato I, Koenig KL, et al. Body fat distribution and obesity in pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:1026–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Tehard B, Lahmann PH, Riboli E, Clavel-Chapelon F. Anthropometry, breast cancer and menopausal status: use of repeated measurements over 10 years of follow-up-results of the French E3N women's cohort study. Int J Cancer. 2004;111:264–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Vatten LJ, Kvinnsland S. Prospective study of height, body mass index and risk of breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 1992;31:195–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Weiderpass E, Braaten T, Magnusson C, Kumle M, Vainio H, Lund E, et al. A prospective study of body size in different periods of life and risk of premenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2004;13:1121–7.Google Scholar
  70. Friedenreich CM. Review of anthropometric factors and breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10:15–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tehard B, Clavel-Chapelon F. Several anthropometric measurements and breast cancer risk: results of the E3N cohort study. Int J Obes. 2006;30:156–63.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Bouchardy C, Le MG, Hill C. Risk factors for breast cancer according to age at diagnosis in a French case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:267–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Hu YH, Nagata C, Shimizu H, Kaneda N, Kashiki Y. Association of body mass index, physical activity, and reproductive histories with breast cancer: a case-control study in Gifu, Japan. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;43:65–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. London SJ, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Rosner B, Speizer FE. Prospective study of relative weight, height, and risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1989;262:2853–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Swanson CA, Brinton LA, Taylor PR, Licitra LM, Ziegler RG, Schairer C. Body size and breast cancer risk assessed in women participating in the breast cancer detection demonstration project. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;130:1133–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Tornberg SA, Holm LE, Carstensen JM. Breast cancer risk in relation to serum cholesterol, serum beta-lipoprotein, height, weight, and blood pressure. Acta Oncol. 1988;27:31–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tretli S. Height and weight in relation to breast cancer morbidity and mortality. A prospective study of 570,000 women in Norway. Int J Cancer. 1989;44:23–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Vatten LJ, Kvinnsland S. Body mass index and risk of breast cancer. A prospective study of 23,826 Norwegian women. Int J Cancer. 1990;45:440–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Willett WC, Browne ML, Bain C, Lipnick RJ, Stampfer MJ, Rosner B, et al. Relative weight and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 1985;122:731–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Huang J, Jin L, Ji G, Xing L, Xu C, Xiong X, et al. Implication from thyroid function decreasing during chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: chemosensitization role of triiodothyronine. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Yang XR, Chang-Claude J, Goode EL, Couch FJ, Nevanlinna H, Milne RL, et al. Associations of breast cancer risk factors with tumor subtypes: a pooled analysis from the Breast Cancer Association consortium studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:250–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Tang HY, Lin HY, Zhang S, Davis FB, Davis PJ. Thyroid hormone causes mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent phosphorylation of the nuclear estrogen receptor. Endocrinology. 2004;145:3265–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Li H, Sun X, Miller E, Wang Q, Tao P, Liu L, et al. BMI, reproductive factors, and breast cancer molecular subtypes: a case-control study and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol. 2017;27:143–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Lin HY, Davis FB, Gordinier JK, Martino LJ, Davis PJ. Thyroid hormone induces activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in cultured cells. Am J Phys. 1999;276:C1014–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Davis PJ, Shih A, Lin HY, Martino LJ, Davis FB. Thyroxine promotes association of mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear thyroid hormone receptor (TR) and causes serine phosphorylation of TR. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38032–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Shih A, Lin HY, Davis FB, Davis PJ. Thyroid hormone promotes serine phosphorylation of p53 by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Biochemistry. 2001;40:2870–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Lin HY, Shih A, Davis FB, Davis PJ. Thyroid hormone promotes the phosphorylation of STAT3 and potentiates the action of epidermal growth factor in cultured cells. Biochem J. 1999;338(Pt 2):427–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  88. Kawai M, Malone KE, Tang MT, Li CI. Height, body mass index (BMI), BMI change, and the risk of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative breast cancer among women ages 20 to 44 years. Cancer. 2014;120:1548–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Quigley DA, Tahiri A, Luders T, Riis MH, Balmain A, Borresen-Dale AL, et al. Age, estrogen, and immune response in breast adenocarcinoma and adjacent normal tissue. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6:e1356142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Angelousi A, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Zapanti E, Nonni A, Ktenas E, Mantzou A, et al. Is there an association between thyroid function abnormalities and breast cancer? Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2017;61:54–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Mendel CM, Weisiger RA, Jones AL, Cavalieri RR. Thyroid hormone-binding proteins in plasma facilitate uniform distribution of thyroxine within tissues: a perfused rat liver study. Endocrinology. 1987;120:1742–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Utiger RD. Estrogen, thyroxine binding in serum, and thyroxine therapy. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1784–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Tosovic A, Bondeson AG, Bondeson L, Ericsson UB, Manjer J. T3 levels in relation to prognostic factors in breast cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:536.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement