Open Access

Prevention of mammary carcinogenesis by short-term estrogen and progestin treatments

  • Lakshmanaswamy Rajkumar1Email author,
  • Raphael C Guzman1,
  • Jason Yang1,
  • Gudmundur Thordarson2,
  • Frank Talamantes2 and
  • Satyabrata Nandi1
Breast Cancer Research20036:R31

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr734

Received: 8 August 2003

Accepted: 9 October 2003

Published: 11 November 2003

Abstract

Introduction

Women who have undergone a full-term pregnancy before the age of 20 have one-half the risk of developing breast cancer compared with women who have never gone through a full-term pregnancy. This protective effect is observed universally among women of all ethnic groups. Parity in rats and mice also protects them against chemically induced mammary carcinogenesis.

Methods

Seven-week-old virgin Lewis rats were given N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. Two weeks later the rats were treated with natural or synthetic estrogens and progestins for 7–21 days by subcutaneous implantation of silastic capsules.

Results

In our current experiment, we demonstrate that short-term sustained exposure to natural or synthetic estrogens along with progestins is effective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Treatment with 30 mg estriol plus 30 mg progesterone for 3 weeks significantly reduced the incidence of mammary cancer. Short-term exposure to ethynyl estradiol plus megesterol acetate or norethindrone was effective in decreasing the incidence of mammary cancers. Tamoxifen plus progesterone treatment for 3 weeks was able to confer only a transient protection from mammary carcinogenesis, while 2-methoxy estradiol plus progesterone was effective in conferring protection against mammary cancers.

Conclusions

The data obtained in the present study demonstrate that, in nulliparous rats, long-term protection against mammary carcinogenesis can be achieved by short-term treatments with natural or synthetic estrogen and progesterone combinations.

Keywords

cancerestrogenmammarypreventionprogestin

Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in women especially in the United States and other Western countries. The risk of developing breast cancer is reduced by 50% in women who have undergone a full-term pregnancy by the age of 20, as compared with nulliparous women [13]. This phenomenon of parity protection against breast cancer is observed universally among women from all ethnic groups. The protective effect of parity is not only observed in humans, but is also found in rats and mice [49].

The mechanism involved in parity protection against breast cancer is still not defined. Understanding the mechanism would help in developing strategies for the prevention of breast cancer. Several studies have supported the hypothesis that the mammary glands in parous rats have decreased proliferation, have higher capacity to repair DNA, have lower binding of carcinogen, and are more differentiated as compared with the mammary gland of age-matched virgin rats [1013]. On the contrary, other studies have found no difference in the structure, in the proliferative activity, or in carcinogen binding to DNA of mammary cells between parous rats and age-matched virgin rats [5, 6].

During pregnancy, several hormones in a cohort cause proliferation and differentiation of the mammary gland. There is a dramatic increase in the levels of circulating estrogens, progesterone, prolactin, growth hormone and placental lactogens. As a consequence of these hormonal exposures, the mammary gland proliferates and differentiates in preparation for lactation [14]. At the end of pregnancy, the mammary gland under the influence of lactogenic hormones becomes fully lactational. After weaning of the offspring, the highly differentiated lobuloalveolar structures subsequently involute as a result of the decrease in lactogenic hormones [14].

Pregnancy before or soon after exposure to a chemical carcinogen is protective against mammary cancers in rodents. Russo and colleagues [1013] have suggested that the protective effect is due to the differentiation of target structures during pregnancy. Others have reported that there are persistent alterations in the levels of circulating hormones in parous women and rats compared with their respective age-matched controls. The blood level of prolactin is reduced in parous women [15, 16]. Thordarson and colleagues [17] have reported a decrease in the circulating concentration of growth hormone in parous rats. They have also demonstrated that mammary glands of parous rats have decreased levels of estrogen receptors and epidermal growth factor receptors compared with age-matched virgin rats. These persistent alterations might be involved in refractoriness to mammary carcinogenesis in parous rats.

Administration of high doses of estradiol and progesterone in combination [1823] or of human chorionic gonadotropin [24] before or after carcinogen treatment was protective against mammary carcinogenesis in rats. The widely accepted explanation for hormone-induced refractoriness to mammary carcinogenesis is that either the target cells for cancer in the mammary gland are altered to a nonsusceptible state by early hormone treatment [23], or that the initiated cells are differentiated following carcinogen treatment [20, 22] or are killed following hormone treatment [24]. We have recently demonstrated that short-term treatment with high pregnancy levels of estradiol with or without progesterone is highly effective in decreasing the mammary cancer incidence [25, 26]. There are also reports implicating alteration in gene expressions as an explanation for the protective effect of pregnancy or the protective hormone treatments against mammary cancer [2730].

The objective of the present study was to examine whether different kinds of natural and/or synthetic estrogens and progestins at different doses and durations would modify the incidence of mammary carcinogenesis following exposure to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU). We tested estriol alone or in combination with progesterone because it is known that estriol levels increase during pregnancy [31]. We also used the synthetic compounds (ethynyl estradiol in combination with megesterol acetate or norethindrone). These compounds are used in combination oral contraceptives, and the risk of uterine and ovarian cancers are reduced by almost 50% in women using contraceptives containing these compounds [32, 33]. Moreover, oral contraceptives do not confer an increased breast cancer risk [34].

We also wanted to test the protective effect, if any, of short-term treatment with tamoxifen combined with progesterone. Long-term treatment with tamoxifen is used as a hormonal therapy for breast cancers [35]. The estrogen metabolites, 2-hydroxy estradiol and 2-methoxy estradiol, which have been reported to inhibit angiogenesis and tumor cell growth [36], were administered alone or in combination with progesterone. Since it is known that estradiol metabolites bind with low affinity to estradiol receptors [3739] and they are less potent estrogens [40, 41] than the parent compound, we attempted to determine whether a weak estrogen alone or in combination with progesterone would be able to mimic the protective effect of pregnancy protection against mammary cancers. We hypothesized that short-term treatment with different estrogens alone or in combination with progestins would be able to mimic the protective effect of pregnancy and to reduce the incidence of mammary carcinogenesis in these treated rats in comparison with untreated controls following exposure to MNU.

Materials and methods

Animals

Virgin Lewis rats were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, IN, USA and San Diego, CA, USA). The rats were housed in a temperature-controlled room with a 12-hour light and 12-hour dark schedule. They were given food (Teklad, Madison, WI, USA) and water ad libitum.

Carcinogen treatment

A single intraperitoneal injection of MNU (Ashe Stevens, Detroit, MI, USA) at a dose of 50 mg/kg body weight was given to all rats at 7 weeks of age. MNU was dissolved in physiological saline that had been adjusted to pH 5.0 [42].

Hormone treatment

All the hormone treatments in the following experiments were given 2 weeks after the administration of the carcinogen. The hormones, natural or synthetic, were packed in individual silastic capsules (0.078 inch ID × 0.125 inch OD, 2 cm long; Dow Corning, Midland, MI, USA). Rats that received a combination hormone treatment were implanted with individual capsules containing the respective hormone. The hormones were packed in the silastic capsules in a cellulose matrix, except for the 30 mg dose that was packed with the hormone alone. The control group received empty silastic capsules. All silastic capsules were implanted subcutaneously dorsally. There were 10–13 rats in the different hormone treatment groups.

Effects of natural and synthetic estrogens and progestins on the prevention of mammary carcinogenesis after exposure to MNU

Effect of estriol plus or minus progesterone on MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis

When the rats were 9 weeks old they were divided into five groups, receiving the following treatments: (1) control, (2) 30 mg estriol, (3) 200 μg estriol (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), (4) 30 mg estriol plus 30 mg progesterone (Sigma), and (5) 200 μg estriol plus 30 mg progesterone in silastic capsules. Each treatment was continued for 1 or 3 weeks.

Effect of ethynyl estradiol plus megesterol acetate or norethindrone on mammary carcinogenesis

Rats were implanted with silastic capsules containing 100 μg ethynyl estradiol (Sigma) and 30 mg megesterol acetate (Sigma) or norethindrone (Sigma). Treatment with 100 μg ethynyl estradiol plus 30 mg megesterol acetate was given for both 1 and 3 weeks. Treatment with 100 μg ethynyl estradiol plus norethindrone was given for 1 week.

Effect of tamoxifen plus progesterone on MNU-induced carcinogenesis

Rats were implanted with silastic capsules containing 30 mg tamoxifen (Sigma) and 30 mg progesterone. The silastic capsules were removed after 3 weeks of treatment.

Effect of 2-hydroxy estradiol or 2-methoxy estradiol with or without progesterone on mammary carcinogenesis induced by MNU

The rats were divided into five groups and were treated as follows: (1) control, (2) 2 mg 2-hydroxy estradiol (Steraloids, Newport, RI, USA), (3) 2 mg 2-hydroxy estradiol plus 30 mg progesterone, (4) 2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol (Steraloids), and (5) 2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol plus 30 mg progesterone.

Mammary carcinogenesis

Rats were palpated once every week after carcinogen exposure for 9 months to monitor for mammary cancer development. Histopathological examination was performed to confirm the carcinomatous nature of the palpable tumors.

Statistics

The effects of the different hormonal treatments were analyzed using the chi-square test for 2 × 2 contingency tables and the Student t test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Effect of estriol alone or with progesterone on mammary cancer incidence and multiplicity

In the present study to determine whether estriol alone or in combination with progesterone could be protective against MNU-induced carcinogenesis, rats treated with 30 mg estriol plus 30 mg progesterone for 3 weeks had a significantly reduced incidence of mammary cancers (25%). The treated rats had an average of 0.4 cancers per rat 9 months after MNU injection, compared with control rats that had a high mammary cancer incidence of 80% and a cancer multiplicity of 1.7 cancers per rat. Treatments with estriol alone for 1 week at a dose of 30 mg (83%) or 200 μg (100%), or with 200 μg estriol plus 30 mg progesterone (75%) did not prevent MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Even when the same doses were given for 3 weeks, the mammary cancer incidence was 64%, 75% and 82%, respectively. Mammary cancer multiplicity in these treatments was not significantly different from that of the controls (Table 1).
Table 1

Effect of estriol on mammary carcinogenesis

Treatment

Duration

Mammary cancer incidence

Rats with mammary cancer (%)

Average number of cancers per rat

Control

3 weeks

8/10

80

1.7 ± 0.4

30 mg estriol

1 week

10/12

83

1.6 ± 0.3

200 μg estriol

1 week

11/11

100

1.7 ± 0.3

30 mg estriol + 30 mg progesterone

1 week

7/12

58

1.2 ± 0.3

200 μg estriol + 30 mg progesterone

1 week

9/12

75

1.6 ± 0.3

30 mg estriol

3 weeks

7/11

64

1.0 ± 0.3

200 μg estriol

3 weeks

9/12

75

1.6 ± 0.3

30 mg estriol + 30 mg progesterone

3 weeks

3/12*

25

0.4 ± 0.2*

200 μg estriol + 30 mg progesterone

3 weeks

9/11

82

2.0 ± 0.4

Rats were treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea at 7 weeks of age. At 9 weeks of age, the rats were treated with hormones for 1 or 3 weeks. Control rats received empty silastic capsules. *P < 0.05 compared with controls.

Effect of ethynyl estradiol plus megesterol acetate or norethindrone on mammary cancer incidence and multiplicity

The mammary cancer incidence (23%) and the average number of cancers per rat (0.2 cancers) were significantly lower in rats treated with ethynyl estradiol and megesterol acetate for 3 weeks compared with controls that had a mammary cancer incidence of 75% and had 1.5 cancers per rat. The same combination of hormones given for 1 week was effective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis for the first 6 months, when the mammary cancer incidence was only 8%, but by 9 months the incidence had increased to 38%. However, the average number of cancers per rat in the 1-week treatment group (0.4 cancers) was significantly lower than the controls. Treatment with ethynyl estradiol and norethindrone for 1 week was effective in drastically decreasing the mammary cancer incidence (25%) and the average number of cancers per rat (0.2 cancers) compared with the controls (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of synthetic estrogens and progestins on mammary carcinogenesis

Treatment

Duration

Mammary cancer incidence

Rats with mammary cancer (%)

Average number of cancers per rat

Control

3 weeks

9/12

75

1.5 ± 0.3

100 μg eE + 30 mg megesterol

3 weeks

3/13*

23

0.3 ± 0.2*

30 mg tamoxifen + 30 mg progesterone

3 weeks

7/12

58

0.9 ± 0.3

100 μg eE + 30 mg megesterol

1 week

5/13

38

0.4 ± 0.1*

100 μg eE + 30 mg norethindrone

1 week

3/12*

25

0.2 ± 0.1*

Rats were treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea at 7 weeks of age. At 9 weeks of age, the rats were treated with hormones for 1 or 3 weeks. Control rats received empty silastic capsules. eE, 17α-ethynyl estradiol. *P < 0.05 compared with controls.

Effect of tamoxifen plus progesterone on mammary cancer incidence and multiplicity

Treatment with tamoxifen and progesterone for 3 weeks was effective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis for the first 6 months after MNU injection, when the incidence reached 30%. Nine months after MNU injection the mammary cancer incidence was 58% and the multiplicity was 0.9, which was not significantly lower than the controls in cancer incidence or multiplicity (Table 2).

Effect of 2-hydroxy estradiol and 2-methoxy estradiol with or without progesterone on mammary cancer incidence and multiplicity

Administrations of estrogen metabolites alone or in combination with progesterone were ineffective in preventing MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis, except for the combination of 2-methoxy estradiol plus progesterone. Two milligrams of 2-hydroxy estradiol (80%) alone or in combination with 30 mg progesterone (60%) did not lower the mammary cancer incidence compared with the controls (75%). Treatment with 2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol alone for 3 weeks did not decrease the mammary cancer incidence (60%) compared with the controls. However, when 2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol was given along with 30 mg progesterone the mammary cancer incidence was lowered (30%) in comparison with the controls (Table 3). This treatment also lowered the average number of cancers per rat (0.4 cancers) compared with the controls (1.3). Even though 2-methoxy estradiol alone was not effective in decreasing the cancer incidence, it was effective in decreasing the average number of cancers per rat by almost 50% (0.7 cancers). Treatments with 2-hydroxy estradiol alone or in combination with progesterone did not affect cancer multiplicity compared with the controls (Table 3).
Table 3

Effect of estrogen metabolites on mammary carcinogenesis

Treatment

Duration

Mammary cancer incidence

Rats with mammary cancer (%)

Average number of cancers per rat

Control

3 weeks

9/12

75

1.3 ± 0.5

2 mg 2-hydroxy estradiol

3 weeks

8/10

80

1.4 ± 0.3

2 mg 2-hydroxy estradiol + 30 mg progesterone

3 weeks

6/10

60

1.5 ± 0.5

2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol

3 weeks

6/10

60

0.7 ± 0.2

2 mg 2-methoxy estradiol + 30 mg progesterone

3 weeks

3/10*

30

0.4 ± 0.2

Rats were treated with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea at 7 weeks of age. At 9 weeks of age, the rats were treated with hormones for 3 weeks. Control rats received empty silastic capsules. *P < 0.05 compared with controls.

Discussion

The results of the present study show that short-term treatments with natural or synthetic ovarian steroids are effective in long-term protection against MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis in female Lewis rats. It is well established that full-term pregnancy is very effective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis in humans, rats and mice [19]. We have previously demonstrated that 1 and 3 weeks of treatment with estradiol 17β with or without progesterone is highly effective in reducing the mammary cancer incidence and cancer multiplicity [25, 26].

Lemon [43] demonstrated that administration of estriol inhibited 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats. The data from our studies show that a high dose of estriol plus progesterone administered for 3 weeks provides long-term protection against mammary carcinogenesis. A similar combination given for 1 week was not effective in reducing mammary carcinogenesis. Estriol alone or at a lower dose in combination with progesterone did not have a protective effect. The data suggest that high levels of estriol in combination with progesterone administered for 3 weeks is effective while a lower dose and a lower duration of treatment were ineffective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis, indicating that prevention of mammary cancer depends on the dose and duration of hormones used.

We demonstrated earlier that the pregnancy level of estradiol with or without progesterone is efficient in conferring protection against mammary cancers. Huggins and colleagues [18] and Grubbs and colleagues [20] previously reported that high levels of estradiol and progesterone given daily for 40 days, beginning 2 weeks after the administration of carcinogen, inhibited the appearance of mammary cancers in rats treated with 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene or MNU. Huggins and colleagues suggested that the potential cancer cells were killed due to differential sensitivity to high levels of ovarian steroids, while Grubbs and colleagues suggested that the protection offered by ovarian steroids was due to differentiation of preneoplastic cells.

Russo and Russo [11, 13] have shown that human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatment also provided protection against mammary carcinogenesis. It has also been suggested that protective hormone treatments result in persistent changes in the intracellular pathways, which mediate proliferation responses to carcinogens [23]. Thordarson and colleagues [17] demonstrated that parous rats given carcinogen and followed by continuous treatment with estradiol and progesterone had a high cancer incidence. These data suggest that parous mammary epithelial cells do undergo transformation, but they have a reduced promotional environment. Short-term hCG treatment resulted in activation of several apoptotic genes like TRMP2, IL-1β converting enzyme, p53, c-myc and bcl-XS [27]. You and colleagues [44] suggested that hCG-conferred protection against mammary cancer was due to an increase in connexin 26, a tumor suppressor gene.

D'Cruz and colleagues have reported persistent downregulation of many growth-promoting factors (amphiregulin, pleiotrophin and insulin-like growth factor 1) and upregulation of genes involved in differentiation (whey acidic protein, caesins, lactoferrin) and in immune response (immunoglobulins, macrophage metalloelastase, macrophage expressed gene 1), and upregulation of transforming growth factor β3 and several of its transcriptional targets (clusterin, Eta, Id2) [28]. Short-term estradiol plus progesterone treatment persistently upregulated RbAp46 and G.B7, genes implicated in chromatin remodeling [29]. Medina and colleagues [30] attributed an increment in p53 gene expression as one of the mechanisms for hormone-induced protection.

Our studies with synthetic estrogenic and progestogenic compounds show that short-duration treatments are sufficient to prevent mammary carcinogenesis. Ethynyl estradiol and norethindrone administered for 1 week are highly effective in preventing the occurrence of mammary cancers. The latent period for the appearance of mammary cancers was very long as no mammary cancer appeared for the first 7 months after the administration of the carcinogen. A combination of 100 μg ethynyl estradiol and 30 mg megesterol acetate was able to prevent MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis when given for 3 weeks. The same combination was less effective when administered for only 1 week. This indicates that the preventive effect of these compounds depends on the dose, the duration and the nature of treatments. Medroxyprogesterone acetate did not increase the risk of carcinoma development when administered to virgin rats at the clinical dose used for contraception. However, a 10-fold dose increase resulted in a higher tumorigenic response, while a similar dose of the mostly estrogenic northynodrel-mestranol was protective [45, 46].

These synthetic hormones are used in oral contraceptives and have been found to decrease the incidence of uterine and ovarian cancers [33]. Previous studies have reported a slight increase or no increase in breast cancer risk in women taking oral contraceptives [47, 48]. It has recently been reported that oral contraceptives do not increase the risk of breast cancers [34]. In our study, we found that these synthetic hormones given for a short duration are capable of preventing mammary carcinogenesis. When we used tamoxifen plus progesterone treatment, there was a significant difference in mammary cancer incidence for the first 6 months. By the end of 9 months, however, there were no differences between the treated group and the control group of rats. This combination had some preventive effect on mammary cancers but it was a short-term effect. In previous studies, tamoxifen treatment given continuously prevents mammary carcinogenesis [35] and the short-term treatment, which we administered here, was not sufficient to prevent mammary cancers. Jordan and colleagues [49] also reported that short-term treatment with various doses of tamoxifen was not able to confer protection against chemical carcinogen-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Jordan [50] later suggested that tamoxifen appears to act as an inhibitor of the tumor cell cycle rather than as a tumoricidal agent in the rat model.

It has been reported that certain estrogen metabolites have a preventive effect in the process of mammary carcinogenesis [36]. It has been reported that 2-hydroxy estradiol is a potent inhibitor of tumor cell proliferation [5153] and angiogenesis [52, 53]. In addition, 2-methoxy estradiol also inhibits the growth of many cancer cell lines [5153]. In the current study, we investigated the effects of two estrogen metabolites on mammary carcinogenesis (namely, 2-hydroxy estradiol and 2-methoxy estradiol) at a dose of 2 mg alone or in combination with 30 mg progesterone. Neither metabolite alone nor 2-hydroxy estradiol in combination with progesterone was effective in preventing mammary cancers. A combination of 2-methoxy estradiol and progesterone, however, was able to decrease the mammary cancer incidence. Both these estrogen metabolites bind to the estrogen receptor, but with a markedly reduced binding affinity as compared with estradiol [3739]. Also, both these metabolites possess much weaker estrogenic potency than estradiol [40, 41]. The reason for the lack of protective effect may be that the reduced binding affinity and weaker potency or the dose of the metabolites we used was not sufficient to produce a strong estrogenic effect.

Lamartiniere and colleagues [54] have shown that phytoestrogen genistein protects against mammary cancer. They also showed that the effect was dose dependent. Since genistein is a weak estrogen, higher doses were needed to achieve protection. It is clear from our data and from data of previous studies that a mid- to late-pregnancy level of estrogen alone or in combination with progesterone is necessary for the protective effect against chemically induced mammary cancers. The protective effect of estrogen plus progestin combinations, whether natural or synthetic, could be similar to parity-induced protection against mammary cancers. It has been shown that there is permanent decrease in the mammogenic hormones, growth hormone and prolactin in parous rats [18, 55]. Parous women also have reduced blood levels of prolactin compared with age-matched nulliparous women [15, 16]. The reduced levels of mammogenic hormones like prolactin and growth hormone resulting in a decrease in promotional environment and the altered sensitivity of the mammary glands to estradiol may also be factors involved in the protective effect against mammary carcinogenesis. Unlike many of the earlier studies where protection was achieved against mammary cancer by administration of high doses of estradiol plus progesterone for a longer duration, we have been able to demonstrate that administration of estrogens and progestins (natural or synthetic) for a short duration is as effective as high-dose combinations and long-duration treatments in preventing mammary cancers.

Conclusions

The overall data from the present study suggest that a variety of estrogenic compounds are able to protect against chemical-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Short-term treatment with low doses of strong estrogenic compounds in combination with progestins are highly effective in preventing mammary carcinogenesis. Our treatments for 1 week with synthetic estrogens and progestins indicate that treatments shorter than the length of gestation in rats will also be able to induce a long-term protection against mammary carcinogenesis. This would help in developing new strategies for prevention of mammary cancers using natural or synthetic hormones for a short duration.

Abbreviations

hCG: 

human chorionic gonadotropin

IL: 

interleukin

MNU: 

N-methyl-N-nitrosourea.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Carol Slatten and Judith Yee for administrative assistance. This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant CA 63369 and by California Breast Cancer Research Program 8PB-0132.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and the Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California
(2)
Department of Biology, University of California

References

  1. MacMahon B, Cole P, Lin TM, Lowe CR, Mirra AP, Ravnihar B, Salber EJ, Valaoras VG, Yuasa S: Age at first birth and breast cancer risk. Bull WHO. 1970, 43: 209-221.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Henderson BE, Powell D, Rosario I, Keys C, Hanisch R, Young M, Casagrande J, Gerkins V, Pike MC: An epidemiologic study of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974, 53: 609-614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kelsey JL, Gammon MD, John EM: Reproductive factors and breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev. 1993, 15: 36-47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Welsch CW: Host factors affecting the growth of carcinogen-induced rat mammary carcinomas: a review and tribute to Charles Brenton Huggins. Cancer Res. 1985, 45: 3415-3443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moon RC: Influence of pregnancy and lactation on experimental mammary carcinogenesis. In Banbury Report 8 Hormones and Breast Cancer. Edited by: Pike MC, Siiteri PK, Welsch CW. 1981, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 353-361.Google Scholar
  6. Sinha DK, Pazik JE, Dao TL: Prevention of mammary carcinogenesis in rats by pregnancy: effect of full-term and interrupted pregnancy. Br J Cancer. 1988, 57: 390-394.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Marchant J: Influence of pregnancy and lactation on the incidence of mammary carcinoma with 3-methylcholanthrene in female mice of IF strain. J Pathol Bact. 1955, 70: 415-418.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Medina D, Smith GH: Chemical carcinogen-induced tumorigenesis in parous, involuted mouse mammary glands. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999, 91: 967-969. 10.1093/jnci/91.11.967.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang J, Yoshizawa K, Nandi S, Tsubura A: Protective effects of pregnancy and lactation against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary carcinomas in female Lewis rats. Carcinogenesis. 1999, 20: 623-628. 10.1093/carcin/20.4.623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Russo J, Russo IH: Influence of differentiation and cell kinetics on the susceptibility of the rat mammary gland to carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1980, 40: 2677-2687.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Russo J, Russo IH: Biological and molecular bases of mammary carcinogenesis. Lab Invest. 1987, 57: 112-137.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Russo J, Tay LK, Russo IH: Differentiation of the mammary gland and susceptibility to carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1982, 2: 5-73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Russo IH, Russo J: Mammary gland neoplasia in long-term rodent studies. Environ Health Perspect. 1996, 104: 938-967.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Imagawa W, Yang J, Guzman R, Nandi S: Control of mammary gland development. In Physiology of Reproduction. Edited by: Knobil E, Neill JD. 1994, New York: Raven Press, 2: 1033-1063. 2Google Scholar
  15. Yu MC, Gerkins VR, Henderson BE, Brown JB, Pike MC: Elevated levels of prolactin in nulliparous women. Br J Cancer. 1981, 43: 826-831.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Musey VC, Collins DC, Musey PI, Martino-Saltzman D, Preedy JR: Long-term effect of a first pregnancy on the secretion of prolactin. N Engl J Med. 1987, 316: 229-234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Thordarson G, Jin E, Guzman RC, Swanson SM, Nandi S, Talamantes F: Refractoriness to mammary tumorigenesis in parous rats: is it caused by persistent changes in the hormonal environment or permanent biochemical alterations in the mammary epithelia?. Carcinogenesis. 1995, 16: 2847-2853.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Huggins C, Grand LC, Brillantes FP: Mammary cancer induced by a single feeding of polynuclear hydrocarbons, and its suppression. Nature. 1961, 189: 204-207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huggins C, Moon RC, Morii S: Extinction of experimental mammary cancer, I. Estradiol-17β and progesterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1962, 48: 379-386.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Grubbs CJ, Peckham JC, McDonough KD: Effect of ovarian hormones on the induction of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea-induced mammary cancer. Carcinogenesis. 1983, 4: 495-497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McCormick GM, Moon RC: Effect of increasing doses of estrogen and progesterone on mammary carcinogenesis in the rat. Eur J Cancer. 1973, 9: 483-486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grubbs CJ, Juliana MM, Whitaker LM: Short-term hormone treatment as a chemopreventive method against mammary cancer initiation in rats. Anticancer Research. 1988, 8: 113-117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sivaraman L, Stephens LC, Markaverich BM, Clark JA, Krnacik S, Conneely OM, O'Malley BW, Medina D: Hormone-induced refractoriness to mammary carcinogenesis in Wistar–Furth rats. Carcinogenesis. 1998, 19: 1573-1581. 10.1093/carcin/19.9.1573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Srivastava P, Russo J, Russo IH: Chorionic gonadotropin inhibits rat mammary carcinogenesis through activation of programmed cell death. Carcinogenesis. 1997, 8: 1799-1808. 10.1093/carcin/18.9.1799.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Guzman RC, Yang J, Rajkumar L, Thordarson G, Chen X, Nandi S: Hormonal prevention of breast cancer: mimicking the protective effect of pregnancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 2520-2525. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.2520.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Rajkumar L, Guzman RC, Yang J, Thordarson G, Talamantes F, Nandi S: Short-term exposure to pregnancy levels of estrogen prevents mammary carcinogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11755-11759. 10.1073/pnas.201393798.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Russo IH, Russo J: Hormonal approach to breast cancer prevention. J Cell Biochem. 2000, 34 (Suppl): 1-6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(2000)77:34+<1::AID-JCB2>3.3.CO;2-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. D'Cruz CM, Moody SE, Master SR, Hartman JL, Keiper EA, Imielinski MB, Cox JD, Wang JY, Ha SI, Keister BA, Chodosh LA: Persistent parity-induced changes in growth factors, TGF-beta3, and differentiation in the rodent mammary gland. Mol Endocrinol. 2002, 16: 2034-2051. 10.1210/me.2002-0073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ginger MR, Gonzalez-Rimbau MF, Gay JP, Rosen JM: Persistent changes in gene expression induced by estrogen and progesterone in the rat mammary gland. Mol Endocrinol. 2001, 15: 1993-2009. 10.1210/me.15.11.1993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Medina D, Sivaraman L, Hilsenbeck SG, Conneely O, Ginger M, Rosen J, Omalle BW: Mechanisms of hormonal prevention of breast cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2001, 952: 23-35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Boots L, Younger JB, Mullis JW, Beck LR: Endocrinology of the maternal–fetoplacental unit. I. Use of serum estrogens as a practical index of fetal well-being. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974, 120: 515-523.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mant JW, Vessey MP: Ovarian and endometrial cancers. Cancer Surveys. 1994, 19–20: 287-307.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaunitz AM: Oral contraceptive health benefits: perception versus reality. Contraception. 1999, 59 (Suppl): 29S-33S. 10.1016/S0010-7824(98)00135-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Brekelmans CT: Risk factors and risk reduction of breast and ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 15: 63-68. 10.1097/00001703-200302000-00010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wolf DM, Jordan VC: A laboratory model to explain the survival advantage observed in patients taking adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1993, 127: 23-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhu BT, Conney AH: Functional role of estrogen metabolism in target cells: review and perspectives. Carcinogenesis. 1998, 19: 1-27. 10.1093/carcin/19.1.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. van Aswegen CH, Purdy RH, Wittliff JL: Binding of 2-hydroxyestradiol and 4-hydroxyestradiol to estrogen receptors from human breast cancers. J Steroid Biochem. 1989, 32: 485-492. 10.1016/0022-4731(89)90380-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ball P, Knuppen R: Catecholoestrogens (2-and 4-hydroxyoestrogens): chemistry, biogenesis, metabolism, occurrence and physiological significance. Acta Endocrinol. 1980, 232 (Suppl): 1-127.Google Scholar
  39. Feigelson HS, Henderson BE: Estrogens and breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 1996, 17: 2279-2284.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Fishman JH: Estradiol binding in the cytosol and nuclear pellet of electrolytically treated rat uteri. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981, 103: 475-482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schutze N, Vollmer G, Tiemann I, Geiger M, Knuppen R: Catecholestrogens are MCF-7 cell estrogen receptor agonists. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993, 46: 781-789. 10.1016/0960-0760(93)90319-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson HJ, Adlakha H: Dose-responsive induction of mammary gland carcinomas by the intraperitoneal injection of 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea. Cancer Res. 1991, 51: 3411-3415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lemon HM: Estriol prevention of mammary carcinoma induced by 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene and procarbazine. Cancer Res. 1975, 35: 1341-1353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. You S, Tu ZJ, Kiang DT: Direct modulation of tumor suppressor connexin 26 gene by human chorionic gonadotropin in rat mammary glands. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 1498-1502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Russo IH, Frederick J, Russo J: Hormone prevention of mammary carcinogenesis by norethynodrel-mestranol. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1989, 14: 43-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Russo IH, Russo J: Hormone prevention of mammary carcinogenesis: a new approach in anticancer research. Anticancer Res. 1988, 8: 1247-1264.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Rao RS, Zauber AG, Strom BL, Warshauer ME, Harlap S, Shapiro S: Case–control study of oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 143: 25-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. La Vecchia C, Altieri A, Franceschi S, Tavani A: Oral contraceptives and cancer: an update. Drug Safety. 2001, 24: 741-754.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Jordan VC, Dix CJ, Allen KE: The effectiveness of long-term treatment on a laboratory model for adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. In Adjuvant Therapy of Cancer II. Edited by: Salmon SE, Jones SE. 1979, New York: Grune and Stratton, 19-24.Google Scholar
  50. Jordan VC: Laboratory studies to develop general principles for the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with antiestrogens: problems and potential future clinical applications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1983, 3 (Suppl): S73-S86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Seegers JC, Aveling ML, Van Aswegen CH, Cross M, Koch F, Joubert WS: The cytotoxic effects of estradiol-17 beta, catecholestradiols and methoxyestradiols on dividing MCF-7 and HeLa cells. J Steroid Biochem. 1989, 32: 797-809. 10.1016/0022-4731(89)90455-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Fotsis T, Zhang Y, Pepper MS, Adlercreutz H, Montesano R, Nawroth PP, Schweigerer L: The endogenous oestrogen metabolite 2-methoxyoestradiol inhibits angiogenesis and suppresses tumour growth. Nature. 1994, 368: 237-239. 10.1038/368237a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Klauber N, Parangi S, Flynn E, Hamel E, D'Amato RJ: Inhibition of angiogenesis and breast cancer in mice by the microtubule inhibitors 2-methoxyestradiol and taxol. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 81-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lamartiniere CA, Cotroneo MS, Fritz WA, Wang J, Mentor-Marcel R, Elgavish A: Genistein chemoprevention: timing and mechanisms of action in murine mammary and prostate. J Nutr. 2002, 132: 552S-558S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Bridges RS, Felicio LF, Pellerin LJ, Stuer AM, Mann PE: Prior parity reduces post-coital diurnal and nocturnal prolactin surges in rats. Life Sci. 1993, 53: 439-445. 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90648-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rajkumar et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. 2004