Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Reversal by RARα agonist Am580 of c-Myc-induced imbalance in RARα/RARγ expression during MMTV-Myc tumorigenesis



Retinoic acid signaling plays key roles in embryonic development and in maintaining the differentiated status of adult tissues. Recently, the nuclear retinoic acid receptor (RAR) isotypes α, β and γ were found to play specific functions in the expansion and differentiation of the stem compartments of various tissues. For instance, RARγ appears to be involved in stem cell compartment expansion, while RARα and RARβ are implicated in the subsequent cell differentiation. We found that over-expressing c-Myc in normal mouse mammary epithelium and in a c-Myc-driven transgenic model of mammary cancer, disrupts the balance between RARγ and RARα/β in favor of RARγ.


The effects of c-Myc on RAR isotype expression were evaluated in normal mouse mammary epithelium, mammary tumor cells obtained from the MMTV-Myc transgenic mouse model as well as human normal immortalized breast epithelial and breast cancer cell lines. The in vivo effect of the RARα-selective agonist 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580) was examined in the MMTV-Myc mouse model of mammary tumorigenesis.


Modulation of the RARα/β to RARγ expression in mammary glands of normal mice, oncomice, and human mammary cell lines through the alteration of RAR-target gene expression affected cell proliferation, survival and tumor growth. Treatment of MMTV-Myc mice with the RARα-selective agonist Am580 led to significant inhibition of mammary tumor growth (~90%, P<0.001), lung metastasis (P<0.01) and extended tumor latency in 63% of mice. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that in these mice, RARα responsive genes such as Cyp26A1, E-cadherin, cellular retinol-binding protein 1 (CRBP1) and p27, were up-regulated. In contrast, the mammary gland tumors of mice that responded poorly to Am580 treatment (37%) expressed significantly higher levels of RARγ. In vitro experiments indicated that the rise in RARγ was functionally linked to promotion of tumor growth and inhibition of differentiation. Thus, activation of the RARα pathway is linked to tumor growth inhibition, differentiation and cell death.


The functional consequence of the interplay between c-Myc oncogene expression and the RARγ to RARα/β balance suggests that prevalence of RARγ over-RARα/β expression levels in breast cancer accompanied by c-Myc amplification or over-expression in breast cancer should be predictive of response to treatment with RARα-isotype-specific agonists and warrant monitoring during clinical trials.

See related editorial by Garattini et al


The retinoic acid (RA) nuclear receptor isotypes retinoic acid receptor (RAR)α, RARβ and RARγ have many overlapping as well as unique functions [14]. The RARs belong to the steroid/thyroid hormone superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors [58], bind both all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and its isomer, 9-cis RA, and form heterodimers with the retinoid × receptor isotypes (RXRs α-γ) [9]. ATRA functions as a pan-agonist of all three RAR isotypes thereby playing crucial roles in embryonic morphogenesis, cell differentiation and maintenance of adult epithelia [10, 11]. These findings together with preclinical, epidemiological and clinical observations [12] have prompted extensive inquiries into ATRA's potential use as an anti-tumor agent. Despite its demonstrated anti-tumor activity in vitro and in a limited number of cancer models [1321] and the highly positive response observed in acute promyelocytic leukemia patients [2224], clinical trials using ATRA as a treatment for solid tumors have produced disappointing results overall [2529].

Although the RAR isotypes display overlapping functions as evidenced by their ability to modulate common target genes [30, 31], Husman et al. [32] described evidence of antagonism between RAR isotypes. Specifically, RARγ1 inhibited functions of other RAR isotypes. In addition, different RAR isotypes can transcribe the same target gene with different efficiencies, with transcription further modulated by their phosphorylation status. Moreover, interactions between isotypes are dynamic and affected by both intracellular and extracellular environments such as changes in cell signaling induced by oncogenic stress and global kinase activity [33].

Studies of the RAR isotypes and their roles in mammary development and breast cancer provide the first clues to the unique activities that certain RAR isotypes have and suggest that certain isotype-selective retinoids may have therapeutic potential against breast cancer. It was shown that specific activation of RARα induces the expression of RARβ, which is required for normal tissue differentiation [10, 11]. Similarly, activation of RARα also induced the expression of the cellular retinol-binding protein-1 (CRBP1), a key retinol chaperone in the cellular metabolism of retinol to ATRA, and maintained the differentiated status of the mature epithelial phenotype [3437]. In contrast, the RARγ isotype had pro-tumorigenic activity in liver cancer models [38], and its activation stimulated breast cancer cell proliferation [39]. On this basis, we tested whether the unique functions of these RAR isotypes could be translated into an effective approach to anti-tumor therapy. To achieve this goal we selected the synthetic retinoid Am580, which is reported to be an RARα-selective transcriptional agonist [40] that does not activate RARγ [40]. Previously, we showed that in the MMTV-Wnt1 and MMTV-Neu transgenic mouse models of breast cancer, in which the oncogene expression is driven by the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter (MMTV), treatment with Am580 [40] significantly prolonged tumor-free survival and impaired tumor growth [39]. In contrast, treatment of MMTV-Neu transgenic mice with the RAR isotype pan-agonist ATRA, which also activates RARγ, promoted tumor growth [41]. Most importantly, these results further demonstrated the reciprocal relationship between RARα and RARγ, whereby direct inhibition of RARγ activity either by a specific RARγ antagonist or by indirect inhibition by ligand-mediated RARα activation leading to down-regulation of RARγ, allowed expression of RARα and its target genes, RARβ and CRBP1. Blocking RARγ while simultaneously activating RARα, strongly impinged on oncogene-induced growth pathways to attenuate the transforming potential of both Neu and Wnt1 oncogenes [39, 42, 43].

This newly discovered cross-regulation of RAR isotypes, coupled with the cancer-promoting role of RARγ and anti-cancer role of RARα, prompted us to investigate their roles in the MMTV-Myc mammary cancer mouse model, in which parous females develop mammary carcinomas with 100% incidence following a latency period of several months. This model is representative of about 30% of human breast cancer cases in which c-Myc is amplified and/or over-expressed [44]. The c-myc gene is often over-expressed in tumors having mutations in the BRCA1 gene [44]. By forming a heterodimer with Max, c-Myc transactivates several proliferation-related genes and consequently prevents Max from forming a Mad/Max heterodimer [45, 46] that represses transcription of cell-cycle/growth arrest genes such as p21waf1/CIP1, p27kip1 and gadd45, and the angiogenesis inhibitor thrombospondin-1 [4749], which are also RARα regulated genes.

Here, we examined whether c-Myc over-expression affected the expression of RAR isotypes and their target genes in normal mouse mammary gland epithelial cells. The goal was to determine whether RARγ expression was enhanced and whether this increase affected c-Myc-induced tumor growth. We also evaluated whether specific activation of RARα by Am580 had anti-tumor effects in c-Myc-induced tumorigenesis.

Overall, our results bring new insights to our understanding of the effect of the c-Myc oncogene on RAR isotype expression, c-Myc/RAR isotype reciprocal relationships, and the novel tumor-promoting role of RARγ. We propose that the characterization of RAR expression in breast cancer will identify patients that would benefit from RAR isotype-selective retinoid treatment.

Materials and methods


Antibody sources were as follows: anti-p27 and anti-E-cadherin (BD Transduction Labs, Hoboken, NJ, USA); anti-CYP26A1 and anti-CRBP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA); anti-RARα, -RARβ and -RARγ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-Akt, anti-pAkt anti-pErk, anti-Erk and anti-pRB (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA); anti-GAPDH (Calbiochem, Gibbstown, NJ, USA); anti-tubulin (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, USA).


Tumor samples were mechanically homogenized in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris, pH 8, 140 mM NaCl, and 0.1% SDS). Primary cultures derived from wild type FVB mice mammary gland epithelium were washed in PBS, pH 7.4, and lysed with RIPA buffer. Immunoblotting was performed following standard procedures as described previously [39].

In vivostudies

Three-month-old uniparous MMTV-Myc female mice (NCI Frederick Mouse Repository, Frederick, MD, USA) (30 mice/group) were fed with 0.3 mg/kg/day of the RARa agonist Am580 (4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid), which was kindly provided by Dr K Shudo (Research Foundation Itsuu Laboratory, Tokyo, Japan). Am580 was mixed into their regular diet by the vendor (Purina 5053, Richmond, IN, USA). Food consumption was measured to calculate the amount of Am580 to be added to the diet to achieve the daily dose as described previously [39]. Regular diet was used as the control. Because the objective was to study the effect of Am580 on tumor initiation and development, mice that developed tumors within the first month were removed from the study on the assumption that their tumors had developed before treatment began. Mice were palpated twice weekly and the onset of tumor development was recorded. Once palpable, the tumor sizes were measured weekly in two dimensions and volumes calculated using the equation Vol = Dxd2/2 (where D = major diameter and d = minor diameter). Tumor-free survival was calculated from Kaplan-Meier curves, and statistical significance was determined using the log-rank test for survival and the t-test for tumor growth. Metastasis dissemination was evaluated by dissecting the lungs from euthanized mice and inspecting the Bouin-fixed (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) lung surface for lesions using a stereoscope (Nikon SMZ800 stereoscope X3 to X5). For xenograft experiments, 8-week-old syngenic FVB mice were used (NCI Frederick Mouse Repository). Cells or tumor fragments were inoculated into the mammary fat pad of the inguinal mammary glands (gland numbers 4 and 8) under soft anesthesia and analgesia in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines.

In Vivoprotocol approval

Protocols designed and used in the in vivo experiments were approved by the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (MSSM) IACUC and conducted following its guidelines.


Tumor samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, transferred to 70% ethanol and kept at 4ºC until use. Sections were prepared from eight tumors per group, subjected to standard antigen retrieval and incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4ºC. Sections were processed using the VectaStain ABC Elite Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), signals were detected using the Metal Enhanced DAB Substrate Kit (Pierce Laboratories, Rockford, IL, USA) and sections counterstained with Harris Hematoxylin Solution (Sigma Diagnostics).

Cell lines, culture conditions and plasmid transfection

After euthanasia by CO2 overdose, tumors from untreated female MMTV-Myc mice and mammary glands from wild-type-FVB female mice were removed by dissection and minced into fragments, which were then digested with 5 ml of 1.5 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS containing 25 mg/ml BSA (Sigma), 100 mM Ca2+ and 100 mM Mg2+ per approximate 500 mg of tissue at 37ºC for 30 to 45 minutes with gentle agitation. Cells were maintained in DMEM-F12 (Cellgro, Manassas, VA, USA) containing 5% (MMTV-Myc cells) or 10% (wt-FVB cells) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 4 μg/ml insulin (Sigma Diagnostics). Immortalized nontumorigenic human MCF-10A breast epithelial cells, which were a generous gift from Dr J Brugge (Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA), were maintained as described by Debnath et al. [50]. Human breast cancer MCF-7 (ER+) and MDA-MB-231 (ER-) cells were obtained from the American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Both cell lines were propagated using ATCC protocols. FVB or Myc cells were transfected with either pSG5-empty, pSG5-RARγ, pSG5-mCRBP1 (kindly provided by Dr Chambon, IGBMC, Strasbourg, France), pcDNA3, or pcDNA3-h-c-Myc (Addgene, Ricci et al. [51]) vectors using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in Opti-MEM (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). At 24 h after transfection, cells were treated for 16 h with 1 μM ATRA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0.01% final concentration; Sigma Diagnostics).

siRNA transfection using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX

MCF-10A, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were plated and grown to 30 to 40% confluence at 24 h. One hour prior to transfection the medium was replaced with 1X Opti-MEM reduced serum medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Anti-RARγ siRNA and a scramble control siRNA sequence (Sigma-Aldrich; seq1 #SASI_Hs01_00012455, seq2 #SASI_Hs01_00012456, Scramble seq #SIC001) were transfected according to the Invitrogen protocol using Lipofectamine RNAiMax reagent (Invitrogen catalogue number 13778-075, Grand Island, NY, USA).

Cell lines and 3D cultures

Primary Myc cell suspensions obtained after a 45-minute collagenase digestion (1.5 mg/ml collagenase and 25 mg/ml BSA in PBS plus 100 mM Ca2+ and 100 mM Mg2+) of MMTV-Myc tumor fragments were grown in DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 5% horse serum, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, 5 mg/ml insulin, 0.5 mg/ml hydrocortisone, 1% Pen/Strep, 1% glutamine (Gibco), 1% non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen) and 20 ng/ml EGF (PeproTech, Rock Hill, NJ, USA). Cells were transfected with shRARγ(2 μg) in 35-mm dishes, following the manufacturer's instructions (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL, USA) and seeded (3 × 103/well) in quadruplicate onto Matrigel® (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) beds in 8-well culture slides (BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA, USA) to prepare three-dimensional cultures as described by Debnath et al. [50]. The media was changed every 48 h for 8 consecutive days. An additional shRARγ transfection was done at day 4 to maintain RARγ knockdown. Colony morphology was determined by phase-contrast microscopy. RARs were silenced using shRNAs from Open Biosystems (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL, USA) shRARα (Oligo ID: V2MM_6881) , shRARβ (Oligo ID: V2HS_239292) or shRARγ (Oligo ID: V2MM_62330). Scrambled shRNA (Open Biosystems, Huntsville, AL, USA) was used as the control.

Proliferation assay

Primary Myc cells (2 × 104) were seeded in triplicate in 6-well culture dishes and allowed to attach overnight. They were then washed with culture medium and treated with the RARγ antagonist SR11253 (2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)-1,3-dithiolane) at increasing doses (10, 50 and 250 nM) or with DMSO (0.001% final concentration) alone, and then detached with 0.05% trypsin (Gibco) and counted every 24 h for 4 days. Statistical significance was determined by t-test. Following the same protocol described above for Myc, MCF-10A, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with 1 μM ATRA (RAR pan-agonist), 200 nM Am580 (RARα agonist), 100 nM CD437 (the RARγ/β agonist 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid, AHPN) (Sigma), 30 nM BMS961 (the RARγ agonist 3-fluoro-4-[[2-hydroxy-2-(5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-2-naphthalenyl)acetyl]amino]benzoic acid) (Tocris, Bristol, UK) and SR11253 or DMSO (0.001% final concentration) alone as the control.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA from FVB mammary gland epithelial cells was isolated using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and reverse-transcribed using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Philadelphia, PA, USA). cDNA was amplified by real-time PCR using an iQ5 Real-Time PCR detection systems kit (Bio-Rad) and SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Primer sequences were: RARγ1-sense: 5'-TGG GGC CTG GAT CTG GTT AC-3', RARγ1-antisense: 5'-TTC ACA GGA GCT GAC CCC AT; RARγ2-sense: 5'-GCC GGG TCG CGA TGT ACG AC and RARγ2-antisense: 5'- TTC ACA GGA GCT GAC CC CAT; RARβ2-sense: 5'-ATG GAG TTC GTG GAC TTT TCT GTG-3' and RARβ2-antisense: 5'-CTC GCA GGC ACT GAC GCC AT-3'; CRBP1-sense: 5'-ACG GGT ACT GGA AGA TGC TG-3' and CRBP1-antisense: 5'-CCA TCC TGC ACG ATC TCT TT-3'; Hmq-c-Myc-sense: 5'-AGC GAC TCT GAG GAG GAA CA-3' and Hmq-c-Myc-antisense: 5'-AGT GGG CTG TGA GGA GGT TT-3'; GAPDH-sense: 5'-CGT AGA CAA AAT GGT GAA GG-3' and GAPDH-antisense: 5'-GAC TCC ACG ACA TAC TCA GC-3'.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Cells from FVB mammary gland epithelium were isolated as described above and seeded in 140-mm plates pre-coated with Matrigel® (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). At 70% confluency, cells were transfected with pSG5 or pSG5-RARγ (10 μg) using Lipofectamine 2000 in Opti-MEM, 24 h after transfection, cells were treated with 1 μM ATRA for 16 h, and then crosslinked using 1% formaldehyde. Cell nuclei were isolated using hypertonic buffer A (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 1% NP40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% SDS, and 2 mM EDTA), centrifuged, lysed in SDS lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8,10 mM EDTA, 1% SDS), and then sonicated. Chromatin from the nuclear fraction obtained was pre-cleared with protein G agarose/sperm salmon (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and irrelevant immunoglobulin G (IgG). RARγ was immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C, and immunoprecipitates were incubated with protein G agarose/sperm salmon for 2 h at 4°C. Immunoprecipitates were washed and eluted with elution buffer (100 mM Na2CO3 and 1% SDS) from agarose beads and incubated in 5 M NaCl at 65°C overnight. DNA was isolated by digestion with proteinase K, treatment with RNAse A, and purification using the QIAquick DNA purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Primers for the detection of the RA response element (RARE) sequence of CRBP1 were designed based on Smith et al. [52]: CRBP1-sense 5'-CTT GCC TAC CCT GAT GGT GT-3' and CRBP1-antisense: 5'-CCC TTC TCA CCT GCT ACC TG-3'. As a control, nonspecific primers were designed using 9000-bp upstream of the CRBP1 promoter; nonspecific-sense: 5'-GCA AGA CTG CTT GCT CTC CT-3' and nonspecific-antisense: 5'-AAC ACA TCG TGG GTG GTC TT-3'.


c-Myc up-regulates RARγ expression leading to down-regulation of RARα target gene, CRBP1

We hypothesized that over-expression of c-Myc in the mammary epithelium of MMTV-Myc transgenic mice leads to up-regulation of RARγ and determine if this up-regulation happens before the development of palpable tumors. To test this hypothesis, we compared RARγ expression in mammary gland epithelium isolated from 15-week-old virgin MMTV-Myc female mice, at which point the mammary epithelium is already hyperplastic, to that of primary mammary epithelium from wt-FVB female mice of the same age. Quantitative (Q)-PCR results (Figure 1A) revealed that compared to normal epithelium, the MMTV-Myc mouse hyperplastic epithelium had elevated levels of RARγ1 and γ2 mRNA and reduced RARβ2, which is commonly silenced in cancer [53]. Western blot analysis confirmed that compared to primary cells cultured from normal FVB mammary epithelium, Myc tumors had elevated RARγ but reduced RARβ protein levels, whereas RARα levels remained unchanged (Figure 1B). Moreover, the elevation in the level of RARγ protein in c-Myc over-expressing cells compared to that in normal FVB cells, appeared to correlate with the reduction in the level of CRBP1 protein (Figure 1C).

Figure 1
figure 1

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)γ cooperates in Myc-induced tumorigenesis and down-regulation of RARβ2 and CRBP1. A) Quantitative (Q)-PCR analysis of RARγ1, γ2 and β2 expression in normal (FVB mammary epithelial cells, MEC) and hyperplastic (Myc MEC) mammary epithelium. B) Western blot analysis of the RAR isotypes in FVB mammary gland epithelium and MMTV-Myc tumors (three primary cultures/experimental group). C) Western blot analysis of RARγ and CRBP1 in Myc tumors and in normal FVB mammary epithelium. D) Q-PCR analysis of RARβ2, RARγ1, RARγ2 and CRBP1 expression in FVB cells transfected with a vector control or c-Myc. E) Induction of CRBP1 protein by Am580. Primary cultured Myc MECs or those stably transfected with shRARγ (Figure S1 in Additional file 1) were treated with 200 nM Am580 for 48 h. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) protein was used as a loading control.

To determine whether modulation of RARγ and CRBP1 were functionally linked to c-Myc expression, primary cultures of FVB mammary epithelial cells were transfected with c-Myc or a control vector (c-Myc expression is shown in Figure S1A in Additional file 1) and for the transfected cells were evaluated for the expression of RARγ and that of the RARα target genes CRBP1 and RARβ [58]. Forced expression of c-Myc specifically elevates RARγ1 mRNA relative to the vector control, but not that of RARγ2 (Figure 1D). Knockdown of RARγ1 in primary Myc cells using shRARγ1 (Figure S1B in Additional file 1) followed by Am580 treatment resulted in an even higher level of CRBP1 expression (Figure 1E), showing that in these cells RARγ has a repressive effect on the RARα target gene CRBP1.

These results suggest that when the RARγ ligand is absent or present only at low physiologic concentration, RARγ over-expression represses CRBP1 expression, but this effect is independent of its canonical activation.

RARγ has a pro-tumorigenic function in c-Myc-induced tumorigenesis

Our results suggest that RARγ is involved in the repression of RARβ and CRBP1 expression, both of which have a tumor-suppressive function [54]. To determine whether RARγ has a pro-tumorigenic function in the context of c-Myc-driven transformation, RARγ was either stably knocked down or over-expressed in primary Myc cells and inoculated orthotopically into the mammary fat pad of syngeneic FVB mice. After 20 days, the tumors formed by RARγ null myc cells displayed a 60% reduction in size in comparison to those formed by Myc-control cells. The Myc cells in which RARγ was over-expressed produced approximately 40% larger tumors (Figure 2A and 2B). These results allude to the fact that RARγ is likely to confer pro-tumorigenic activity.

Figure 2
figure 2

Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)γ modulates tumor cell growth, differentiation and morphology in MMTV-Myc xenografts in FVB mice. A) Primary cells from MMTV-Myc tumors were isolated and cultured. They were then transfected with the control vector pSG5 or a vector tethered to shRARγ or pSG5-RARγ, shRARγ or pSG5-RARγ plasmids. Transfected cells (0.5 × 106) were inoculated orthotopically into the abdominal mammary gland fat pad (gland number 4) of 10 FVB female mice, whereas their contralateral fat pad was inoculated with pSG5-transfected cells to serve as an internal control. Tumor volume shown is after 15 days of in vivo growth. Results shown are representative of two independent experiments. B) Immunoblotting of tumor cell lysates with anti-RARγ antibody showing the levels of RARγ in the shRARγ and pSG5-RARγ-transfected Myc cells. Immunohistochemical analysis of five sections per group of tumors derived from the shRARγ-transfected cells compared to the vector control cells (C and D). C) Expression of cell growth-arrest marker p27 (brown); space bar = 100 um. D) Expression of differentiation marker E-cadherin. Plasma membrane-associated E-cadherin was detected in the shRARγ tumors (open arrow); space bar = 20 um. E) Morphologic analysis of Myc cells cultured under three-dimensional conditions in Matrigel® (4 wells/group); bar = 100 μm. The number of colonies exhibiting the invasive (t-test P < 0.0001, light-gray bars) and noninvasive (t-test P < 0.0001, dark-gray bars) phenotype was quantified. F) RARγ antagonist SR11253 inhibits Myc tumor cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Proliferating Myc cells were treated with increasing concentrations of SR11253 as shown. G) Confocal immunofluorescence for p27 (cell arrest marker, red) and pRB (proliferation marker, green) in Myc cells transfected with the shRARγ construct and in vector alone-transfected control cells; bar = 50 μm. Panels E, F and G are representative of three independent experiments.

Immunohistological analysis of tumor sections isolated from mice implanted with shRARγ-transfected Myc cells showed increased expression of p27 (Figure 2C), which is a marker of cell-cycle arrest [55], and membrane-associated E-cadherin (Figure 2D arrow), which is a marker of epithelial cell differentiation [56].

Given the pro-tumorigenic activity of RARγ, we examined the effect of RARγ knockdown on tumor invasiveness by generating three-dimensional cultures. In this approach, Myc cells were oligofected with siRARγ both before being plated in Matrigel® as described by Debnath et al. [50] and then again on day 4. The colonies were then cultured for 8 days before the size and morphology of the resulting colonies were determined. Colonies formed by control cells transfected by vector alone were large (>200 um) and invasive, with long matrix-penetrating spikes. In contrast, the siRARγ-transfected cells developed only small (around 100 μm), smooth, rounded acinar-like colonies. The difference in invasiveness between control and siRARγ-transfected cells was quantified by counting 100 colonies per group (n = 4 wells/group) and was found to be highly statistically significant (Figure 2E).

In addition to knocking down RARγ, we also explored the effect of pharmacologic inhibition of its activity using the RARγ antagonist SR11253 [57, 58] in Myc cells in vitro. SR11253 treatment reduced Myc cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (IC50 value = 50 nM after 96 h) (Figure 2F). The anti-proliferative effect achieved by reducing the expression of RARγ coincided with up-regulation of p27 and down-regulation of pRb, as shown by confocal immunofluorescence (Figure 2G).

These results show that c-Myc over-expression increases the level of RARγ. Up-regulation of RARγ led to proliferation and invasiveness.

RARγ supports proliferation and survival of human breast cell lines

In order to determine if the pro-proliferative effect of RARγ in the Myc-expressing mouse mammary tumor cells is also present in human mammary cells, RARγ was knocked-down with siRNAs in immortalized non-tumorigenic human MCF-10A cells, estrogen receptor (ER+) MCF-7 cells and triple negative (ER-/progesterone receptor-/HER2-) MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. As shown in Figure 3A-C, the proliferation of all three cell lines was significantly impaired by RARγ knockdown. Treatment with 200 nM Am580 enhanced the anti-proliferative effect exhibited by RARγ knockdown in the MCF-10A and MCF-7 cell lines but not in the MDA-MB-231 cells. The lack of an effect in MDA-MB-231 is most likely due to the low expression level of RARα in these cells [59]. Although, c-Myc expression was low in MCF-10A cells and high in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells) (Figure 3D), this difference did not impinge on the changes in the rate of proliferation induced by modulation of RARγ expression.

Figure 3
figure 3

Cell proliferation assays of human cell lines. A-C). Effect of knockdown of retinoic acid receptor (RAR)γ on proliferation of human MCF-10A immortalized, non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells (A), MCF-7 breast cancer cells (B) and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (C) using siRARγ. Cells transfected with scrambled siRNA were used as controls. Treatment of siRARγ-transfected cells with 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580) (100 nM) in DMSO (0.01% final concentration) further reduced proliferation of MCF-10A and MCF-7 cells, which express RARα, but did not reduce that of the RARα-negative MDA-MB-231 cells. D) Relative to c-Myc expression in MCF-10A cells, that in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells was 38- and 55-fold higher, respectively, according to quantitative PCR. Results shown are representative of two independent experiments.

We treated the three human cell lines and Myc-expressing mouse mammary cells with RARγ agonist BMS961, RARγ/β agonist CD347 and RARγ antagonist SR11253 alone, or in combination with ATRA or Am580. Similarly to the results obtained using RARγ knockdown (Figure 3), co-treatment of these cell lines, including the mouse Myc cells, with the RARγ antagonist SR11253 and RARα agonist Am580, resulted in strong growth inhibition (Figure 4). As expected, Am580-inhibited MCF-10A- and MCF-7-cell growth (Figure 4, upper panels) were growth-inhibited by Am580, whereas RARγ agonist BMS961 increased their proliferation. Antagonist SR11253 inhibited the proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 4, lower left panel), which was not further inhibited by combination with Am580, as was expected due to their low expression of RARα. The general pattern of responses of the Myc mouse cells to treatment was similar to the human cells, except that the CD437/AHPN (RARγ/β agonist) and its combination with Am580 impaired cell proliferation most effectively (Figure 4, lower right panel). These results show that the pro-proliferative effect of RARγ is ligand-dependent and more importantly, that it can be targeted by RARγ-specific antagonists such as SR11253, alone or in combination with Am580.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of retinoids on cell proliferation. Human MCF-10A, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231 and mouse Myc cells were treated for 96 h with 0.01% DMSO as control, 1 uM All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) (retinoic acid receptor, RAR, pan-agonist), 200 nM Am580 (RARα agonist), 100 nM CD437 (RARγ and β agonist), 30 nM BMS961 (RARγ agonist), 200 nM SR11253 (RARγ antagonist), and combinations of 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580) with CD437, BMS961 and SR11235 at the same concentrations. Cells were counted at the end of the experiment. Results shown are representative of two independent experiments and confirmed by MTS (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) cell viability assays (not shown).

To further examine the specific roles of the RAR isotypes, each one (α, β or γ) was individually knocked down in MCF-10A cells using specific shRNAs (Figure 5C). Down-regulation of RARα or RARβ altered the cellular morphology from a more cobblestone-like structure to that of a more spindle-like shape (Figure 5A), suggesting that both isotypes could participate in control of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). In contrast, down-regulation of RARγ impaired cell survival, with cells showing a progressively increasing unhealthy star-like morphology (Figure 5A, right panel). Confocal immunofluorescence analysis using pRb (green) as a surrogate marker for proliferation and p27 (red) for cell-cycle arrest, indicated that knocking down RARα or RARβ increased proliferation (increased pRb expression), whereas knocking down RARγ promoted cell-cycle arrest (increased p27 expression). The p27 levels increased further when shRARγ-transfected cells were treated with 1 uM ATRA for 48 h (Figure 5B), suggesting that changing the ratio of RARα or β to RARγ affects the cellular response to ATRA.

Figure 5
figure 5

Down-regulation of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) isotypes in immortalized normal human mammary MCF-10A cells using shRNA affects morphology and response to All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA). A) Phase-contrast micrographs of MCF-10A cells transfected with shRNA against RARα, RARβ or RARγ show distinct effects on cell morphology compared to nontransfected control cells. Equal numbers of transfected and control cells were seeded and then photographed after 48 h; bar = 20 μm. B) Confocal micrographs showing effects on MCF-10A cell proliferation as determined by staining for cell-cycle arrest marker p27 (red) and proliferation marker pRB (green) after transfection with shRARα, shRARβ, shRARγ or scrambled control (SCR) in the presence or absence of 1 uM ATRA; bar = 100 μm. C) Immunoblotting with isotype-selective antibodies illustrates silencing achieved with individual shRNAs. Tubulin was used as the loading control. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments.

Effects of RARα activation by Am580 on tumor latency, growth and lung metastasis

Based on our prior work [39] and the above results, we reasoned that use of a RARα-selective agonist might circumvent the pro-proliferative and pRb repressive effects induced by activation of RARγ [11] and thereby prevent tumor development. To accomplish this goal, we selected the RARα agonist Am580 [60], which was reported to have 10-fold higher binding affinity for RARα than RARβ and no detectable affinity for RARγ [40]. Uniparous, 15-week-old MMTV-Myc female mice, 30 per group, were fed standard diet containing Am580 or the standard diet alone (Myc-Ctrl group) and palpated twice weekly for the appearance of tumors. Tumors were first noted at week 16 in both experimental groups (control diet and Am580 diet). At week 50, no significant difference in tumor development was observed between the two groups analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plot. At that time, 80% of the Am580-treated mice and 100% of the control mice had tumors (Figure 6A, Myc-Ctrl vs. Am580-treated; NR+R, where NR are Am580 non-responders, and R are Am580 responders). Analysis of the tumor growth rates after initial tumor detection revealed two distinct sub-populations in the Am580-treatment group, those with fast-growing tumors (Figure 6B, Am580 non-responders denoted by squares) and those with slow-growing tumors (Figure 6B, Am580-responders denoted by triangles). Of 27 treated mice available for evaluation at week 50, 17 (63%) responded to Am580 treatment with 90% reduction in tumor size relative to the untreated controls, while 10 (37%) did not show a tumor size reduction (non-responders) (Figure 6B). Comparison of the Am580 responders to the Myc-Ctrl group by Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that tumor latency in the responders was significantly extended (P = 0.0465, log-rank test, Am580 R vs. Myc-Ctrl), with 35% of the treated Am580-responding mice not developing tumors at 50 weeks (Figure 6B).

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of Am580 treatment on mammary tumor development, tumor growth and metastatic dissemination in MMTV-Myc mice. Groups of 30 uniparous MMTV-Myc female mice were given 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580) (0.3 mg/Kg/day) in the diet or control diet for up to 50 weeks. A) Time to palpable tumor development was recorded to determine percent of mice with tumor-free survival over time. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the data indicated that numbers of mice with extended latency were not significantly different between treated (Am580 (NR+R)) and untreated control (Myc-Ctrl) groups. However, separation of data from the treated group at week 50 on the basis of positive response (Am580 R) or nonresponse (Am580 NR) to Am580 dosing, and reanalysis indicated that the percent of Am580 R mice responding to Am580 as evidenced by the increased tumor latency, from the total Am580 (NR+R) group was significantly higher than the percent of Myc-Ctrl mice (log-rank test, P = 0.0456). B) Tumor growth was recorded by measuring the two main diameters weekly over an 8-week period beginning when tumors were palpable, and volumes were calculated as described in Methods. Analysis of individual tumor growth per mouse indicated two distinct populations in the Am580 treatment group on the basis of tumor volume, namely responders (Am580 R) and nonresponders (Am580 NR). C) Effect of Am580 on metastatic dissemination to lungs in the Myc-Ctrl, Am580 R and Am580 NR experimental groups. The number of overt metastases per mouse lung was quantified under a Nikon stereoscope and plotted. The statistical significance of the results was determined using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric test.

Metastatic dissemination of tumor cells is the ultimate cause of death in breast cancer with the lungs being one of the major target organs for metastasis to occur [61]. Analysis of lung metastasis incidence and number of metastatic lesions per mouse revealed that, compared to untreated mice (Myc-Ctrl) of which 66.6% developed lung metastases, only 16.6% of the Am580-responsive mice had metastases. The incidence of metastases in Am580 non-responsive mice was 71.4%, whereas compared to this group, Am580 responders had 36.8% metastasis incidence. The number of metastases per responder mouse was also reduced by Am580 (Figure 6C). Together these results demonstrate the ability of Am580 to reduce tumor growth and aggressiveness in the MMTV-Myc tumor model.

Difference in Am580 response is related to the RARα/RARγ balance in tumors

Because the MMTV-Myc mouse is an inbred population, we did not expect the difference in response to Am580 to be host-dependent. However, to rule it out formally, two tumors from each Am580 treatment group were excised, minced and then inoculated into the mammary fat pads of separate groups of syngenic FVB females, which have the same genetic background of the MMTV-Myc transgenic model. Inoculated mice were fed the diet containing Am580 for 20 days. The transplanted tumors recapitulated the individual patterns of response and non-response of the original tumor (Additional file 2, Figure S2) indicating that the response to Am580 was independent of the host and intrinsic to the tumor.

We, therefore, tested whether an imbalance in RAR isotype expression defined the response to Am580 treatment. Analysis of RAR isotype protein levels showed that Am580 NR tumors expressed higher RARγ protein levels than Am580 R tumors (Figure 7A). To confirm that high expression of RARγ correlated with lack of responsiveness to Am580, sections from untreated (control) and treated responsive and nonresponsive tumors were examined for protein levels of RARα target genes by western blotting and immunohistochemistry. As shown in Figure 7A, tumor lysates of Am580-responsive mice treated with Am580 exhibited increased levels of growth arrest (p27) and differentiation (E-cadherin) markers compared to the Am580-nonresponsive tumors. Tumor lysates of Am580-treated nonresponsive mice also had increased levels of p-Erk1/2 (Figure 7A), which also suggests an increased proliferative response. RARα protein levels were low in both Am580 treatment groups, whereas RARγ was much higher in the Am580 non-responsive tumors. Immunohistochemistry of tumor sections (Figure 7B) confirmed the western blot results by showing enhanced levels of E-cadherin and p27 in the Am580 responsive tumors and also revealed, that the RARα target gene involved in ATRA catabolism, cytosolic Cyp26A1, was strongly induced in these tumors compared to the Am580 nonresponsive and Myc-Ctrl tumors. Both immunohistochemistry (Figure 7C) and western blotting (Figure 8A) showed that Am580 treatment induced robust CRBP1 expression exclusively in the responsive tumors. The only CRBP1-positive cells detected in the untreated control and nonresponsive tumors were host stromal cells (black arrows in Figure 7C and data not shown). Interestingly, the responsive tumors showed focal outgrowths negative for CRBP1 staining, which may correspond to nonresponsive precursors (white arrows in Figure 7C). Despite induction of several differentiation markers, no overt morphological signs of tissue differentiation, such as the acinar-like structures observed in the three-dimensional cultures (Figure 1E), were detected in these tumor sections. However, scattered necrotic areas in both nonresponsive and responsive tumor sections were observed and found to be bigger and more prevalent in the responsive sections (Figure 7D, white arrows).

Figure 7
figure 7

Analysis of tumors from Am580-treated and untreated control mice. A) Immunoblotting analyses for E-cadherin, retinoic acid receptor (RAR)α, RARγ, phosphorylated Erk (activation) and p27 levels of 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580)-responsive (Am580 R) and -nonresponsive (Am580 NR) tumors (three representatives from each group of five tumors shown). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a loading control. B) Immunohistochemical analyses of RARα-responsive genes Cyp26A, E-cadherin and p27 (brown staining) in sections from (Am580 R, Am580 NR and Myc-Ctrl tumors; scale bar = 200 μm. C) Immunohistochemical analysis for CRBP1 expression in tumor sections indicates that tumors from Am580 R mice expressed CRBP1, whereas only stromal cells in tumor sections from the Am580 NR and Myc-Ctrl mice expressed CRBP1 (black arrows). Am580 R tumor sections had small nodules of CRBP1-negative cells (white arrows); bar = 400 μm. D) H & E staining of a Myc-Ctrl tumor section reveals an invasive carcinoma with very few necrotic areas, whereas a section from an Am580 NR tumor displays an increase in frequency of necrosis (white arrows; bar = 200 μm) and that from an Am580 R tumor displays larger and more necrotic areas (white arrows; bar = 400 μm). Sections shown are representative of five replicates. Immunohistochemical analysis was done on sections from eight tumors per experimental group.

Figure 8
figure 8

CRBP1 is a downstream target of retinoic acid receptor (RAR)γ. A) Immunoblotting analysis of CRBP1 protein in tumor lysates from 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580)-responsive (Am580 R) and Am580-nonresponsive (Am580 NR) tumors. Results from three representative tumors from each experimental group are shown. Tubulin was used as a loading control. B) and C) Quantitative (Q)-PCR analysis of CRBP1 gene expression in normal mammary epithelial cells obtained from FVB mice transfected with RARγ or vector control and treated with 1 uM All-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) or vehicle control for 48 h. D) Primary mammary epithelial cells obtained from a normal FVB female mouse were isolated and used to generate a primary culture that was treated with each retinoid (100 nM Am580, 1 uM ATRA, 100 nMSR11253 and 60 nM BMS961) for 72 h., CRBP1 protein levels were determined by western blot analysis. Results shown are representative of three independent experiments. E) Chip analysis of lysates from normal FVB mammary epithelial cells treated or not with 1 μM ATRA for 48 h to examine interaction of RARγ with the CRBP1 gene promoter. Results presented are representative of three independent experiments done in triplicate.

RARγ down-regulates CRBP1 expression by direct transcriptional repression

Since RARγ and CRBP1 expression levels were inversely regulated in c-Myc-expressing tumors (Figure 1B), as shown by up-regulation of CRBP1 protein by RARγ inhibition [39] and (Figure 1D), we explored the possibility that ligand-free RARγ could transcriptionally repress CRBP1. We ectopically expressed RARγ in primary mammary epithelial cells isolated from FVB mice and analyzed its effect on CRBP1 expression (mRNA) and protein levels (Figure 8B and 8C, respectively) and found a slight down-regulation in CRBP1 levels. ATRA treatment strongly induced CRBP1 expression at mRNA (Figure 8B) and, to a lesser degree, protein levels (Figure 8C). It is possible that the CRBP1 protein level continues to accumulate beyond the 24 h shown here, as was shown in rat Sertoli cells in which the half-life of CRBP1 was calculated to be 48 h [62].

To test the regulation of CRBP1 in mammary epithelial cells by retinoids, primary mammary epithelium from three 9-week-old FVB females, was treated for 3 days with 100 nM Am580, 1 uM ATRA, 100 nM SR11253, 60 nM BMS961, or their combination and CRBP1 levels were evaluated by western blot analysis (Figure 8D). CRBP1 protein was increased by RARα agonist Am580 alone or with RARγ agonist BMS961 (Figure 2 second and eighth lanes) and by RAR pan-agonist ATRA plus BMS961 (Figure 2 ninth lane) but reduced by RARγ antagonist SR11253. No major changes in CRBP1 expression level were observed in cells treated with ATRA, Am580 plus SR11253, ATRA plus SR11253, or BMS961. These results show that in contrast to Myc-expressing cells, CRBP1 protein levels are reduced in normal mammary epithelium when RARγ transcriptional activation is blocked, suggesting that oncogenic stress changes the RARγ function, possibly through changes in the RARγ-associated transcriptional complex, additional studies are required to elucidate these differences.

Although we did not examine the composition of the transcriptional complex, using ChiP assays we showed that over-expression of RARγ in normal mammary cells led to an enrichment of RARγ promoter (Figure 8E); whereas treatment of these cells with ATRA led to a slight CRBP1 reduction in CRBP1 promoter-associated RARγ and re-expression of CRBP1 (Figure 8B-D). These results suggest a repressive role for RARγ. Because ATRA activates all three RAR isotypes, we propose that in normal cells, activated RARα competes with RARγ for binding to the RARE in the CRBP1 promoter. Under the influence of over-expressed c-Myc, the ratio of RARα/RARγ changes profoundly in favor of RARγ, thus limiting the ability of RARα to displace RARγ from this promoter.


Our data show that c-Myc over-expression in mammary epithelial cells alters the RARα -β/RARγ balance through RARγ up-regulation. The relative increase in RARγ isotype expression relative to the α and β isotypes correlates with tumor progression and lack of expression of RARα target genes involved in cell-cycle arrest and differentiation. In contrast, a shift towards RARα activation by the selective RARα agonist Am580 induces a tumor-inhibiting response in MMTV-Myc mice. Of the Am580-treated mice, approximately 63% responded to Am580 treatment by showing an anti-tumor effect with decreased tumor growth rates and lower incidence and number of lung metastases, while the rest (37%) did not respond to Am580. Only the responders displayed reduced levels of RARγ protein in their tumors, accompanied by increased expression of RARα target genes.

Collectively, several specific results obtained here identify RARγ as a pro-oncogenic RAR isotype. First, antagonism of RARγ transactivation by pharmacologic levels of its antagonist SR11253 dose-dependently halted the rapid growth of cells that over-expressed the oncogene Myc. Second, RARγ knockdown in MMTV-Myc cells, enabled RARα-selective Am580 to more effectively inhibit cell growth and to increase levels of the RARα target gene, CRBP1. Moreover, CRBP1 expression was higher in MMTV-Myc tumors in mice that responded to Am580 treatment. This result is important because we previously reported that re-expression of CRBP1 was associated with impaired tumor progression [42, 43].

CRBP1 expression also decreased after normal mammary epithelial cells were ectopically transfected with RARγ, whereas specific pharmacologic activation of RARγ increased CRBP1 expression. The fact that in normal mammary epithelia RARγ-mediated repression of CRBP1 expression occurred only in the absence of its agonist, or at low agonist concentration (due to the presence of retinol in the serum), suggests that additional changes such as those induced by such oncogenes as c-Myc are required to potentiate the gene repressive function of RARγ in the presence of ligand.

In addition to the role of RARγ in Myc-mouse mammary epithelial cells, we documented its pro-oncogenic role in human breast cancer cells lines. Knockdown of RARγ expression in immortalized epithelial MCF-10A (ER-, non-tumorigenic), MCF-7 (ER+, tumorigenic) and MDA-MB-231 (ER-, PR- and HER2-,tumorigenic) breast cancer cell lines led to their reduced proliferation. With the exception of MDA-MB-231 cells, proliferation was further reduced by treatment with RARα agonist Am580. The lack of response by MDA-MB-231 cells may most likely be due to their low levels of RARα [59] (also see Figure 3). This reduction in cellular proliferation by the addition of Am580 implies that RARα is the tumor suppressor isotype. This conclusion was further strengthened by the experiments (Figure 5) in which selective down-regulation of RARα or RARβ in MCF-10A cells promoted the appearance of a less differentiated, more proliferative phenotype, while reduction of RARγ expression led to cell-cycle arrest and reduced cell survival (Figure 5).

The results from the experiments using a genetic approach to RAR isotype regulation were recapitulated using synthetic RAR isotype-specific retinoids in both human and the mouse cell lines. Individually, a RARα agonist and a RARγ antagonist reduced cell growth and their combination was even more effective. The RARγ agonist significantly induced the growth of MCF7 breast cancer cells. Interestingly, MDA-MB-231 cells, which did not respond to Am580, became sensitized to Am580 by co-treatment with RARγ antagonist SR11253. The combination of Am580 with CD437/AHPN in the Myc cells gave the strongest growth inhibition; we believe that this strong response is probably related to the RAR-independent pro-apoptotic effects described for the CD437 that interestingly include the inhibition of c-Myc expression [6365]. In this regard Paroni et al. [66] have shown that RARα was co-amplified in approximately one third of ERBB2+ human breast cancers. In culture, treating such cells with the ERBB2 inhibitor lapatinib combined with ATRA synergistically inhibited growth, and induced cell differentiation and apoptosis. We previously showed that in transgenic mice bearing MMTV-Neu- and -Wnt1-driven tumors [39], and report here that in mice bearing MMTV-Myc-driven tumors and in human breast cancer cell lines, RARγ expression is counterproductive to the anti-cancer effects of ATRA. On this basis, we propose that substituting a RARα-selective or specific agonist for the RAR pan-agonist ATRA should improve the therapeutic response.

Our findings are unique in that they describe a specific role for c-Myc-mediated differential regulation of RAR isotypes in which predominance of RARγ facilitates the pro-oncogenic phenotype. Our results are in agreement with the proliferative role of RARγ in hematopoiesis [3] and hepatocellular carcinoma [38]. We find that in the context of c-Myc expression the oncogenic function of RARγ is potentiated. Myc increases RARγ expression, leading to changes in the stoichiometry between RAR isotypes. Knockdown of RARγ in MMTV-Myc-derived cancer cells impaired tumor growth in a xenograft model and induced markers of cell-cycle arrest, differentiation and acinar-like morphogenesis in three-dimensional cultures.

Functional specificity of RAR depends on the ability of these isotypes to bind and recruit other co-repressors or co-activators [67]. However, most studies to date have focused on the presence of RARα or the lack of RARβ. Privalsky et al. showed that RARγ has low affinity for classical co-repressors associated with nuclear receptors, such as N-CoR or SMRT [68], suggesting a different mechanism of repression would be induced by RARγ. In a recent paper [69], RARγ was shown to control both the association and dissociation of the chromatin repressor Suz12 from transcriptional complexes. Suz12 belongs to the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 and its up-regulation has been associated with cancer and stem cell compartment maintenance [70, 71]. It is possible that oncogenic stress induces an up-regulation of both RARγ and Suz12, promoting an aberrant association between the two proteins leading to abnormal RARγ function and gene expression outcome.

Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins are known to control the recruitment of DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) to target promoters [72] and it is possible that over-expressed RARγ bound to the CRBP1 promoter favors this process. This repressive effect of RARγ on CRBP1 expression may be an early response to c-Myc oncogenic transformation that reduces CRBP1 expression, which later becomes permanent, by promoter hypermethylation [73, 74]. In such a scenario RARα may no longer be able to compete for CRBP1 promoter occupancy so that cells became insensitive to Am580 treatment. Although, this is an attractive and testable scenario, we can exclude the possibility that the decrease in CRBP1 expression caused by RARγ up-regulation is due to the lack of recruitment of transcription activators to CRBP1 promoter, suggesting that RARγ is a less efficient transactivator instead of being a strict repressor. Further analysis is required to determine how a shift in the RAR isotypes induced by c-Myc affects co-activators, co-repressors and other regulatory components of the transcriptional complexes.

As a whole, our results suggest that RARγ has an opposite role in tumorigenesis than RARα or RARβ. Oncogenic stress, which deregulates important cell signaling pathways and alters the normal function of nuclear receptors such as RARs, can induce RARγ expression and its pro-survival function inducing RARα-β/RARγ imbalance and aberrant repression of RARα-target genes. Pharmacologic activation of RARα, or inhibition of RARγ activity, reduces cancer cell growth in vitro, thereby suggesting that a specific RARα agonist would be a more effective method of cancer treatment than an RAR pan-agonist such us ATRA.


Genetic and pharmacologic approaches in cell culture and in vivo allowed us to conclude that maintenance of a proper RARαβ/γ balance is crucial for preserving normal epithelial cell homeostasis. An oncogenic signal initiated by c-Myc over-expression increases RARγ expression, which perturbs the RARαβ/γ balance in favor of RARγ. The consequence of this change is down-regulation of tumor suppressive genes such as RARα, RARβ and CRBP1, and possibly others. This pro-tumorigenic c-Myc induced effect can be overcome by selective activation of RARα that leads to the re-expression of CRBP1 and reversion of the malignant phenotype. Elucidating the mechanism through which RAR isotypes are involved in c-Myc tumorigenesis is clinically relevant since c-Myc expression is altered in 25% of human breast cancers [7578]. The combined results of the present study alongside those previously published [39] support the use of a RARα-selective agonist and/or RARγ-selective antagonist as a therapeutic approach for a subset of patients. We propose that determining the balance of RAR isotypes in cancer tissues compared to normal ones will improve tumor classification and will identify those tumors in which RAR isotype-selective intervention would be of benefit to the patients.



4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid


American Type Culture Collection


All-trans retinoic acid


bovine serum albumin


cellular retinol-binding protein 1




Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium


dimethyl sulfoxide


epithelial growth factor


epithelial to mesenchymal transition


estrogen receptor


fetal bovine serum


Friend Virus B wild type mice


glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

H & E:

haematoxylin and eosin


Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee


immunoglobulin G


mammary epithelial cells


mouse mammary tumor virus




phosphate buffered saline


polymerase chain reaction




retinoic acid


retinoic acid receptor


retinoic acid response element


radioimmunoprecipitation assay


retinoid × receptor


sodium dodecyl sulfate.


  1. Dolle P: Developmental expression of retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Nucl Recept Signal. 2009, 7: e006-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Han YH, Zhou H, Kim JH, Yan TD, Lee KH, Wu H, Lin F, Lu N, Liu J, Zeng JZ, Zhang XK: A unique cytoplasmic localization of RARgamma and its regulations. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 18503-14. 10.1074/jbc.M109.007708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Purton LE, Dworkin S, Olsen GH, Walkley CR, Fabb SA, Collins SJ, Chambon P: RARgamma is critical for maintaining a balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. J Exp Med. 2006, 203: 1283-1293. 10.1084/jem.20052105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Spinella MJ, Kitareewan S, Mellado B, Sekula D, Khoo KS, Dmitrovsky E: Specific retinoid receptors cooperate to signal growth suppression and maturation of human embryonal carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 1998, 16: 3471-3480. 10.1038/sj.onc.1201876.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Astrom A, Pettersson U, Krust A, Chambon P, Voorhees JJ: Retinoic acid and synthetic analogs differentially activate retinoic acid receptor dependent transcription. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990, 173: 339-345. 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)81062-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mark M, Ghyselinck NB, Chambon P: Function of retinoic acid receptors during embryonic development. Nucl Recept Signal. 2009, 7: e002-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mark M, Ghyselinck NB, Chambon P: Function of retinoid nuclear receptors: lessons from genetic and pharmacological dissections of the retinoic acid signaling pathway during mouse embryogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006, 46: 451-480. 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141156.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lohnes D, Mark M, Mendelsohn C, Dolle P, Decimo D, LeMeur M, Dierich A, Gorry P, Chambon P: Developmental roles of the retinoic acid receptors. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995, 53: 475-486. 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00094-G.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rochette-Egly C, Germain P: Dynamic and combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs). Nucl Recept Signal. 2009, 7: e005-

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, Gronemeyer H: International Union of Pharmacology. LXIII. Retinoid × receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2006, 58: 760-772. 10.1124/pr.58.4.7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Germain P, Chambon P, Eichele G, Evans RM, Lazar MA, Leid M, De Lera AR, Lotan R, Mangelsdorf DJ, Gronemeyer H: International Union of Pharmacology. LX. Retinoic acid receptors. Pharmacol Rev. 2006, 58: 712-725. 10.1124/pr.58.4.4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hong WK, Sporn MB: Recent advances in chemoprevention of cancer. Science. 1997, 278: 1073-1077. 10.1126/science.278.5340.1073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitzgerald P, Teng M, Chandraratna RA, Heyman RA, Allegretto EA: Retinoic acid receptor alpha expression correlates with retinoid-induced growth inhibition of human breast cancer cells regardless of estrogen receptor status. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 2642-2650.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Toma S, Isnardi L, Raffo P, Dastoli G, De Francisci E, Riccardi L, Palumbo R, Bollag W: Effects of all-trans-retinoic acid and 13-cis-retinoic acid on breast-cancer cell lines: growth inhibition and apoptosis induction. Int J Cancer. 1997, 70: 619-627. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970304)70:5<619::AID-IJC21>3.0.CO;2-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fontana JA, Hobbs PD, Dawson MI: Inhibition of mammary carcinoma growth by retinoidal benzoic acid derivatives. Exp Cell Biol. 1988, 56: 254-263.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donato LJ, Noy N: Suppression of mammary carcinoma growth by retinoic acid: proapoptotic genes are targets for retinoic acid receptor and cellular retinoic acid-binding protein II signaling. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 8193-8199. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu Y, Lee MO, Wang HG, Li Y, Hashimoto Y, Klaus M, Reed JC, Zhang X: Retinoic acid receptor beta mediates the growth-inhibitory effect of retinoic acid by promoting apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1996, 16: 1138-1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Seewaldt VL, Kim JH, Caldwell LE, Johnson BS, Swisshelm K, Collins SJ: All-trans-retinoic acid mediates G1 arrest but not apoptosis of normal human mammary epithelial cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1997, 8: 631-641.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sporn MB, Dunlop NM, Newton DL, Smith JM: Prevention of chemical carcinogenesis by vitamin A and its synthetic analogs (retinoids). Fed Proc. 1976, 35: 1332-1338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moon RC, Mehta RG: Chemoprevention of experimental carcinogenesis in animals. Prev Med. 1989, 18: 576-591. 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90031-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Steele VE, Moon RC, Lubet RA, Grubbs CJ, Reddy BS, Wargovich M, McCormick DL, Pereira MA, Crowell JA, Bagheri D, Sigman CC, Boone CW, Kelloff GJ: Preclinical efficacy evaluation of potential chemopreventive agents in animal carcinogenesis models: methods and results from the NCI Chemoprevention Drug Development Program. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994, 20: 32-54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang ME, Ye YC, Chen SR, Chai JR, Lu JX, Zhoa L, Gu LJ, Wang ZY: Use of all-trans retinoic acid in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 1988, 72: 567-572.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Castaigne S, Chomienne C, Daniel MT, Ballerini P, Berger R, Fenaux P, Degos L: All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results. Blood. 1990, 76: 1704-1709.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de The H, Chen Z: Acute promyelocytic leukaemia: novel insights into the mechanisms of cure. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010, 10: 775-783. 10.1038/nrc2943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu JM, DiPietrantonio AM, Hsieh TC: Mechanism of fenretinide (4-HPR)-induced cell death. Apoptosis. 2001, 6: 377-388. 10.1023/A:1011342220621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anzano MA, Byers SW, Smith JM, Peer CW, Mullen LT, Brown CC, Roberts AB, Sporn MB: Prevention of breast cancer in the rat with 9-cis-retinoic acid as a single agent and in combination with tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 1994, 54: 4614-4617.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Farol LT, Hymes KB: Bexarotene: a clinical review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2004, 4: 180-188. 10.1586/14737140.4.2.180.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rigas JR, Dragnev KH: Emerging role of rexinoids in non-small cell lung cancer: focus on bexarotene. Oncologist. 2005, 10: 22-33. 10.1634/theoncologist.10-1-22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dragnev KH, Petty WJ, Ma Y, Rigas JR, Dmitrovsky E: Nonclassical retinoids and lung carcinogenesis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2005, 6: 237-244. 10.3816/CLC.2005.n.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chiba H, Clifford J, Metzger D, Chambon P: Specific and redundant functions of retinoid × Receptor/Retinoic acid receptor heterodimers in differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis of F9 embryonal carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1997, 139: 735-747. 10.1083/jcb.139.3.735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gillespie RF, Gudas LJ: Retinoic acid receptor isotype specificity in F9 teratocarcinoma stem cells results from the differential recruitment of coregulators to retinoic response elements. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 33421-33434. 10.1074/jbc.M704845200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Husmann M, Lehmann J, Hoffmann B, Hermann T, Tzukerman M, Pfahl M: Antagonism between retinoic acid receptors. Mol Cell Biol. 1991, 11: 4097-4103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Duong V, Rochette-Egly C: The molecular physiology of nuclear retinoic acid receptors. From health to disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011, 1812: 1023-1031. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.10.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chytil F, Ong DE: Cellular retinol- and retinoic acid-binding proteins in vitamin A action. Fed Proc. 1979, 38: 2510-2514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burns LL, Ropson IJ: Folding of intracellular retinol and retinoic acid binding proteins. Proteins. 2001, 43: 292-302. 10.1002/prot.1040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Li E, Norris AW: Structure/function of cytoplasmic vitamin A-binding proteins. Annu Rev Nutr. 1996, 16: 205-234. 10.1146/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Napoli JL, Boerman MH, Chai X, Zhai Y, Fiorella PD: Enzymes and binding proteins affecting retinoic acid concentrations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995, 53: 497-502. 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00096-I.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yan TD, Wu H, Zhang HP, Lu N, Ye P, Yu FH, Zhou H, Li WG, Cao X, Lin YY, He JY, Gao WW, Zhao Y, Xie L, Chen JB, Zhang XK, Zeng JZ: Oncogenic potential of retinoic acid receptor-gamma in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 2285-2295. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2968.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu Y, Bertran S, Samuels TA, Mira-y-Lopez R, Farias EF: Mechanism of inhibition of MMTV-neu and MMTV-wnt1 induced mammary oncogenesis by RARalpha agonist AM580. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 3665-3676. 10.1038/onc.2010.119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Delescluse C, Cavey MT, Martin B, Bernard BA, Reichert U, Maignan J, Darmon M, Shroot B: Selective high affinity retinoic acid receptor alpha or beta-gamma ligands. Mol Pharmacol. 1991, 40: 556-562.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schug TT, Berry DC, Shaw NS, Travis SN, Noy N: Opposing effects of retinoic acid on cell growth result from alternate activation of two different nuclear receptors. Cell. 2007, 129: 723-733. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Farias EF, Marzan C, Mira-y-Lopez R: Cellular retinol-binding protein-I inhibits PI3K/Akt signaling through a retinoic acid receptor-dependent mechanism that regulates p85-p110 heterodimerization. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1598-1606. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Farias EF, Ong DE, Ghyselinck NB, Nakajo S, Kuppumbatti YS, Mira y Lopez R: Cellular retinol-binding protein I, a regulator of breast epithelial retinoic acid receptor activity, cell differentiation, and tumorigenicity. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 21-29. 10.1093/jnci/dji004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen Y, Olopade OI: MYC in breast tumor progression. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008, 8: 1689-1698. 10.1586/14737140.8.10.1689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Grandori C, Eisenman RN: Myc target genes. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997, 22: 177-181. 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01025-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grandori C, Cowley SM, James LP, Eisenman RN: The Myc/Max/Mad network and the transcriptional control of cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2000, 16: 653-699. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Claassen GF, Hann SR: Myc-mediated transformation: the repression connection. Oncogene. 1999, 18: 2925-2933. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Watnick RS, Cheng YN, Rangarajan A, Ince TA, Weinberg RA: Ras modulates Myc activity to repress thrombospondin-1 expression and increase tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2003, 3: 219-231. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00030-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dimberg A, Oberg F: Retinoic acid-induced cell cycle arrest of human myeloid cell lines. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003, 44: 1641-1650. 10.1080/1042819031000083316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Debnath J, Muthuswamy SK, Brugge JS: Morphogenesis and oncogenesis of MCF-10A mammary epithelial acini grown in three-dimensional basement membrane cultures. Methods. 2003, 30: 256-268. 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00032-X.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ricci MS, Jin Z, Dews M, Yu D, Thomas-Tikhonenko A, Dicker DT, El-Deiry WS: Direct repression of FLIP expression by c-myc is a major determinant of TRAIL sensitivity. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 8541-8555. 10.1128/MCB.24.19.8541-8555.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith WC, Nakshatri H, Leroy P, Rees J, Chambon P: A retinoic acid response element is present in the mouse cellular retinol binding protein I (mCRBPI) promoter. EMBO J. 1991, 10: 2223-2230.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Esteller M: Profiling aberrant DNA methylation in hematologic neoplasms: a view from the tip of the iceberg. Clin Immunol. 2003, 109: 80-88. 10.1016/S1521-6616(03)00208-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Orlando FA, Brown KD: Unraveling breast cancer heterogeneity through transcriptomic and epigenomic analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009, 16: 2270-2279. 10.1245/s10434-009-0500-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Borriello A, Bencivenga D, Criscuolo M, Caldarelli I, Cucciolla V, Tramontano A, Borgia A, Spina A, Oliva A, Naviglio S, Della Regione F: Targeting p27Kip1 protein: its relevance in the therapy of human cancer. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2011, 15: 677-693. 10.1517/14728222.2011.561318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Nieto MA: The ins and outs of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition in health and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011, 27: 347-376. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dawson MI, Zhang XK: Discovery and design of retinoic acid receptor and retinoid × receptor class- and subtype-selective synthetic analogs of all-trans-retinoic acid and 9-cis-retinoic acid. Curr Med Chem. 2002, 9: 623-637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Peterson VJ, Barofsky E, Deinzer ML, Dawson MI, Feng KC, Zhang XK, Madduru MR, Leid M: Mass-spectrometric analysis of agonist-induced retinoic acid receptor gamma conformational change. Biochem J. 2002, 362: 173-181. 10.1042/0264-6021:3620173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lu M, Mira-y-Lopez R, Nakajo S, Nakaya K, Jing Y: Expression of estrogen receptor alpha, retinoic acid receptor alpha and cellular retinoic acid binding protein II genes is coordinately regulated in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 4362-4369. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kagechika H, Kawachi E, Hashimoto Y, Himi T, Shudo K: Retinobenzoic acids. 1. Structure-activity relationships of aromatic amides with retinoidal activity. J Med Chem. 1988, 31: 2182-2192. 10.1021/jm00119a021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nguyen DX, Bos PD, Massague J: Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 274-284. 10.1038/nrc2622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Eskild W, Troen G, Blaner WS, Nilsson A, Hansson V: Evidence for independent control at the mRNA and protein levels of cellular retinol binding protein 1 in rat Sertoli cells. J Reprod Fertil. 2000, 119: 101-109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sun SY, Yue P, Chandraratna RA, Tesfaigzi Y, Hong WK, Lotan R: Dual mechanisms of action of the retinoid CD437: nuclear retinoic acid receptor-mediated suppression of squamous differentiation and receptor-independent induction of apoptosis in UMSCC22B human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2000, 58: 508-514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rishi AK, Zhang L, Boyanapalli M, Wali A, Mohammad RM, Yu Y, Fontana JA, Hatfield JS, Dawson MI, Majumdar AP, Reicher U: Identification and characterization of a cell cycle and apoptosis regulatory protein-1 as a novel mediator of apoptosis signaling by retinoid CD437. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 33422-33435. 10.1074/jbc.M303173200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Farhana L, Dawson MI, Leid M, Wang L, Moore DD, Liu G, Xia Z, Fontana JA: Adamantyl-substituted retinoid-related molecules bind small heterodimer partner and modulate the Sin3A repressor. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 318-325. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Paroni G, Fratelli M, Gardini G, Bassano C, Flora M, Zanetti A, Guarnaccia V, Ubezio P, Centritto F, Terao M, Garattini E: Synergistic antitumor activity of lapatinib and retinoids on a novel subtype of breast cancer with coamplification of ERBB2 and RARA. Oncogene. 2011, 31: 3431-43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Chambon P: A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. Faseb J. 1996, 10: 940-954.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Mengeling BJ, Goodson ML, Bourguet W, Privalsky ML: SMRTepsilon, a corepressor variant, interacts with a restricted subset of nuclear receptors, including the retinoic acid receptors alpha and beta. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 351: 306-316. 10.1016/j.mce.2012.01.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Amat R, Gudas LJ: RARgamma is required for correct deposition and removal of Suz12 and H2A.Z in embryonic stem cells. J Cell Physiol. 2011, 226: 293-298. 10.1002/jcp.22420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kirmizis A, Bartley SM, Farnham PJ: Identification of the polycomb group protein SU(Z)12 as a potential molecular target for human cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003, 2: 113-121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Iliopoulos D, Lindahl-Allen M, Polytarchou C, Hirsch HA, Tsichlis PN, Struhl K: Loss of miR-200 inhibition of Suz12 leads to polycomb-mediated repression required for the formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Mol Cell. 2010, 39: 761-772. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Vire E, Brenner C, Deplus R, Blanchon L, Fraga M, Didelot C, Morey L, Van Eynde A, Bernard D, Vanderwinden JM, Bollen M, Esteller M, Di Croce L, de Launoit Y, Fuks F: The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature. 2006, 439: 871-874. 10.1038/nature04431.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Arapshian A, Bertran S, Kuppumbatti YS, Nakajo S, Mira YLR: Epigenetic CRBP downregulation appears to be an evolutionarily conserved (human and mouse) and oncogene-specific phenomenon in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2004, 3: 13-10.1186/1476-4598-3-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Kuppumbatti YS, Bleiweiss IJ, Mandeli JP, Waxman S, Mira YLR: Cellular retinol-binding protein expression and breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 475-480. 10.1093/jnci/92.6.475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Boxer RB, Jang JW, Sintasath L, Chodosh LA: Lack of sustained regression of c-MYC-induced mammary adenocarcinomas following brief or prolonged MYC inactivation. Cancer Cell. 2004, 6: 577-586. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.10.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Liao DJ, Dickson RB: c-Myc in breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2000, 7: 143-164. 10.1677/erc.0.0070143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Watson PH, Safneck JR, Le K, Dubik D, Shiu RP: Relationship of c-myc amplification to progression of breast cancer from in situ to invasive tumor and lymph node metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993, 85: 902-907. 10.1093/jnci/85.11.902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Shiu RP, Watson PH, Dubik D: c-myc oncogene expression in estrogen-dependent and -independent breast cancer. Clin Chem. 1993, 39: 353-355.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr K Shudo for his generous gift of Am580 allowing us to complete the in vivo studies; Dr J Brugge for sharing with us the MCF-10A cells; Dr P Chambon for providing the collection of RARs and CRBP1 expression vectors and Drs L Ossowski, JA Aguirre-Ghiso, E Dmitrovsky and S Waxman for helpful advice and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by NCI Grant R01-CA119018, the Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation (SWCRF), The Chemotherapy Foundation, NIH-NCI shared resources grant 5R24 CA095823-04, NSF Major Research Instrumentation grant DBI-9724504 and an NIH shared instrumentation grant 1 S10 RR0 9145-01 to the MSSM Microscopy Shared Resources Facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo F Farias.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AB generated, assembled and analyzed the data on gene expression, protein levels and ChIP analysis. SPB generated and genotyped the transgenic mice required for the in vivo experiments, and collected and analyzed the in vivo data. YL conducted the in vivo treatments, collected the spontaneous tumor development data and performed the immunohistochemical analysis of the tumors. AG participated in the collection and analysis of the in vitro an in vivo data. AMJ conducted and assembled the in vitro proliferation assays. MID supplied RARγ agonist and antagonist, technical assistance in the compound used and critical editing of the manuscript. EFF conceived and designed the study, collected and assembled the data, performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All the authors participated in the edition of the manuscript and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Figure S1: Gene expression controls. A) Quantitative (Q)-PCR showing expression levels of human c-Myc in FVB mammary epithelial cells after transfection with pcDNA3 vector control (FVB-Ctrl) or with pcDNA3-h-c-Myc (FVB-Myc). B) Q-PCR showing retinoic acid receptor (RAR) γ expression is knocked-down by shRARγ in Myc cells. (JPEG 226 KB)


Additional file 2: Figure S2: Am580 NR and Am580 R xenograft responses to Am580. Because the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter can be expressed in some cells of the immune system, it was important to determine whether the MMTV-Myc xenograft host FVB animal influenced response to 4-[(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthyl)carboxamido]benzoic acid (Am580) treatment. Therefore, tumor cells obtained from two Am580-nonresponsive (NR1 and NR2) and two Am580-responsive (R1 and R2) xenografts that had been obtained from Am580-treated MMTV-Myc mice were injected into the abdominal mammary fat pad of FVB syngenic females (n = 10, analysis of variance P<0.001) and tumor growth was monitored. Both Am580 R and Am580 NR xenografts retained their respective slow and fast tumor growth rates in their FVB hosts as those observed in tumors from the original transgenic groups indicating that growth behavior was intrinsic to the tumors, and not associated with an immunologic response by the host mice. (JPEG 290 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bosch, A., Bertran, S.P., Lu, Y. et al. Reversal by RARα agonist Am580 of c-Myc-induced imbalance in RARα/RARγ expression during MMTV-Myc tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Res 14, R121 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: