Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Review
  • Open Access

Role of miR-10b in breast cancer metastasis

Breast Cancer Research201012:210

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2720

  • Published:

Abstract

Ninety percent of cancer-related mortality is caused by metastasis. Current cancer treatments can control many primary tumors but rarely stop the metastatic spread. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that miRNAs are involved in cancer initiation and progression. Furthermore, several miRNAs have been found to regulate metastasis. In particular, recent studies provide the first functional evidence that overexpression of a specific miRNA, miR-10b, can contribute to the development of metastasis, which can be exploited therapeutically in treating breast cancer metastasis in mice. Further in-depth analysis should provide more precise evaluation of the roles, mechanisms, and therapeutic utility of this miRNA in breast cancer.

Keywords

  • Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor
  • Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell
  • Human Mammary Epithelial Cell
  • Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell
  • Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor

Introduction

The ability of primary tumor cells to disseminate and metastasize depends on their genetic and epigenetic alterations as well as the microenvironmental cues they receive. New molecular technologies, such as DNA micro-arrays, have identified a variety of molecules that contribute to the development of metastasis. These molecules include growth factors, cytokines and chemokines, proangiogenic factors, extracellular matrix-remodeling molecules, several epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) inducing transcription factors, as well as certain miRNAs [13]. Understanding of the molecular and cellular determinants of metastasis, however, is still limited. Moreover, current prognostic markers of many cancers, including primary breast carcinomas, only poorly predict eventual metastatic progression [4]. For these reasons, critical regulators of the metastatic process that have implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment - including proteins, and small and large noncoding RNAs - continue to be highly sought.

miRNAs are small noncoding RNA molecules that bind to perfect or imperfect complementary sequences at the 3' UTR of target mRNAs, leading to either mRNA degradation or inhibition of their translation, or both [5]. In an initial screen for miRNAs differentially expressed in human breast cancer cells, the three most significantly upregulated miRNAs miR-155, miR-9, and miR-10b were identified [6].

miR-10b is a particularly interesting candidate given its close correlation with metastatic behaviors. The subsequent functional studies of miR-10b validated its candidacy as a mechanistically important miRNA, as demonstrated by in vivo experiments showing that overexpression of miR-10b in otherwise nonmetastatic breast tumors triggered tumor invasion and distant metastasis in xenotrans-plantation models [6]. These findings provided the first evidence that overexpression of a specific miRNA can contribute to the development of metastasis. Conversely, therapeutic silencing of miR-10b with antagomirs suppressed metastasis in a mouse mammary tumor model [7]. Further studies are needed to address the remaining questions, including: Does miR-10b play a role in normal development and in progression of spontaneous breast cancer? At which stage and in which subset of tumor cells is miR-10b expression activated? Which clinical cancers would respond to inhibition of miR-10b?

miR-10b expression correlates with high-grade malignancy and metastatic behaviors

miR-10b was first identified as a miRNA that is highly expressed specifically in metastatic breast cancer cell lines - cell lines that are capable of launching metastases when growing as primary mammary tumors in mice. When compared with normal human mammary epithelial cells, metastatic cell lines MDA-MB-231 and SUM1315 exhibit 50-fold higher miR-10b expression levels [6]; in contrast, nonmetastatic breast cancer cell lines SUM149, SUM159, and MCF-7 express lower miR-10b levels than human mammary epithelial cells [6]. This expression pattern was confirmed and further extended by an independent study [8]. In addition, miR-10b is among the most significantly upregulated miRNAs in the 4T1 metastatic mouse mammary tumor cell line relative to its nonmetastatic or poorly metastatic isogenic relatives (67NR, 168FARN, and 4TO7) [9].

In clinical breast cancers, miR-10b expression levels were first examined in 23 advance-stage breast cancer patients whose tumor samples were obtained at the time of mastectomy: relative to normal mammary tissues, the level of this miRNA is lower in primary breast tumors isolated from metastasis-free patients, while 50% of metastasis-positive patients show elevated miR-10b levels in their breast tumors [6]. On the other hand, miR-10b expression levels in unfractionated bulk cell populations of tumors removed from early-stage breast cancer patients do not predict future metastatic recurrence [10]. It may not be informative, however, to make a prognosis based on expression analysis performed on the heterogeneous cell populations within early-stage primary tumors, in which metastatic cells may not be present or may represent only a rare subset of the total tumor mass.

In advance-stage tumors, miR-10b expression indeed correlates with high-grade malignancy in various cancer types. Higher levels of miR-10b were observed in metastatic samples relative to matched primary tumors [11]. Another study reported that miR-10b is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinomas from metastasis-positive patients compared with hepatocellular carcinomas from metastasis-free patients [12]. In addition, miR-10b is one of the top upregulated miRNAs in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas [13] and glioblastomas [14, 15], two types of highly metastatic and/or invasive cancers. In human gliomas, miR-10b levels correlate with tumor grade, invasiveness, and levels of the tumor invasive factors urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and RhoC [16]. Compared with normal Schwann cells, miR-10b is markedly upregulated in tumor tissues from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and in Schwann cells isolated from neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) neurofibromas [17].

miR-10b functionally contributes to tumor invasion and metastasis

Overexpression of miR-10b can endow cancer cells with invasive and metastatic abilities in vivo. The first evidence came from overexpression analyses in two xenograft models. In both cases, human breast carcinoma cells were implanted into the mammary fat pads of NOD-SCID mice. In the SUM149 model, at 6 weeks post implantation, the control tumors were non-invasive, as evidenced by their confinement within fibrotic capsules; in contrast, the miR-10b-expressing SUM149 tumors displayed substantial invasion, with islands of carcinoma cells that invaded the stroma [6]. From 9 weeks, the lungs of mice bearing miR-10b-expressing tumors, but not the control tumors, showed clusters of micrometastatic cells, as evidenced by cytokeratin immunostaining. In another otherwise nonmetastatic human breast cancer cell line, the SUM159 line, ectopic expression of miR-10b led to more visible signs of lung metastases as well as macroscopic peritoneal metastases [6]. These results suggest that miR-10b is a metastasis-promoting miRNA in vivo in breast cancer.

miR-10b is also involved in the progression of other types of cancer. Antisense silencing of miR-10b in NF1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion [17]. In esophageal cancer cells, ectopic expression of miR-10b increased cell motility and invasiveness, whereas inhibition of miR-10b reduced cell invasiveness [18]. When miR-10b was overexpressed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, it markedly induced the cells' in vitro migration and invasion, as well as in vivo metastasis formation in nude mice [19]. Although the role of miR-10b in pancreatic cancer has not yet been reported, miR-10a - which shares the same seed sequence as miR-10b, and differs from miR-10b by a single nucleotide - has been reported to be a metastasis-promoting miRNA in pancreatic cancer cells [20].

Regulation of expression and molecular mechanisms of miR-10b action

In breast cancer cells, miR-10b levels correlate not only with metastatic potential, but also with expression levels of the EMT-inducing, metastasis-promoting transcription factor Twist [6]. This association has also been extended in other types of cancer. For instance, in a collection of 46 head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, miR-10b and Twist were found to be highly correlated (P = 0.006) [21].

Twist is a pleiotropic transcription factor [22]. Among its multiple targets, Twist activates the transcription of the mir-10b gene (Figure 1) by binding directly to an E-box sequence proximal to its putative promoter [6]. Although the miR-10b miRNA does not trigger an EMT by itself, it appears to be required for Twist-induced cell motility and invasiveness in human mammary epithelial cells [6], suggesting that miR-10b is a mediator of some elements of the multicomponent, Twist-induced EMT program, but not an inducer of EMT on its own.
Figure 1
Figure 1

miR-10b-mediated pathways in regulating tumor progression and metastasis. Multiple cancer gene products - including breast cancer metastasis suppressor-1 (BRMS1), latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1), CD44 and c-Src - regulate Twist expression. Among its multiple downstream targets/effectors, elevated expression of the transcription factor Twist in breast cancer cells induces the transcription of miR-10b. This miRNA suppresses synthesis of the HOXD10 protein, a negative regulator of breast cancer progression, permitting expression of pro-metastatic gene products, RhoC, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), α3-integrin, and MT1-MMP. This in turn favors cancer cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Expression of HOXD10 is also inhibited by a long noncoding, metastasis-promoting RNA named HOTAIR. In addition, miR-10b targets KLF4 in esophageal cancer cells, leading to increased migration and invasion. In neurofibromatosis type 1-associated tumor cells, miR-10b targets the neurofibromin tumor suppressor, leading to activated RAS signaling. Color code: green, oncogenic and/or pro-metastatic factors; red, tumor-suppressing and/or metastasis-suppressing factors.

Similar to other pleiotropically acting factors (for example, transcription factors), each miRNA can function through regulating the expression of many target mRNAs, particularly through one or a few key target mRNAs. In mammary epithelial cells and breast carcinoma cells, miR-10b can directly suppress the translation of HOXD10, an mRNA encoding a transcriptional repressor that inhibits expression of several genes involved in cell migration and extracellular matrix remodeling, such as RhoC, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, α3-integrin, and MT1-MMP (Figure 1) [6]. Interestingly, HOXD10 is not only targeted by the miR-10b miRNA, but also targeted by a long noncoding RNA termed HOTAIR, which has also been shown to promote breast cancer metastasis (Figure 1) [23]. Ostensibly, HOTAIR reprograms the chromatin state, causing increased Polycomb repressive complex-2 occupancy on promoters of genes that inhibit breast cancer progression, including HOXD10 [23]. On the other hand, miR-10b could also suppress the expression of T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-1, a guanidine exchange factor for Rac, in the SUM159 breast cancer cell line [24]. The effect of miR-10b on metastatic behaviors of cancer cells is thus most likely to be a consequence of regulating multiple target mRNAs expressed in these cells. This is analogous to other cancer genes that regulate the expression of numerous target genes with either similar or opposing functions, such as the oncogene MYC, which can activate both pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes [25].

Several independent groups have further confirmed the Twist-miR-10b-HOXD10-RhoC pathway and demonstrated that this pathway is regulated by known cancer gene products (Figure 1). One study revealed that ectopic expression of the breast cancer metastasis suppressor-1 gene, a negative regulator of Twist expression, leads to downregulation of miR-10b and RhoC, as well as upregulation of HOXD10, in highly metastatic breast tumor cells [8]. Another group reported that this pathway is positively regulated by CD44 and Src: binding of hyaluronan to CD44 leads to c-Src kinase activation, which in turn activates Twist through phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Further analyses demonstrated that miR-10b is controlled by the Twist binding site in its promoter region, and that induction of miR-10b expression by hyaluronan/CD44-activated c-Src in breast cancer cells is Twist dependent. This leads to downregulation of HOXD10, RhoA/RhoC upregulation, Rho-kinase activation and breast cancer cell invasion [26]. A third study showed that miR-10b is highly expressed in Epstein-Barr virus-positive, latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1)expressing, metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells relative to LMP1-negative, nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, and is downregulated in response to silencing either LMP1 or Twist. Moreover, LMP1 expression leads to induction of miR-10b, which is Twist dependent [19].

Other targets of miR-10b have been identified in various tumor cell types. For instance, miR-10b can directly target the mRNA of the tumor suppressor neurofibromin in NF1 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cells, indicating that this miRNA might play an important role in NF1 tumor formation and progression through silencing neurofibromin and activating RAS signaling in these cells (Figure 1) [17]. This also illustrated a new mechanism (in addition to NF1 loss of heterozygosity, unequal expression of NF1 alleles, NF1 mRNA editing, and so forth) for downregulating the NF1 tumor suppressor in tumors suffering from NF1 heterozygosity. Moreover, KLF4 - a transcription factor with context-dependent oncogenic or tumor-suppressor functions [27, 28] that has been reported to inhibit esophageal cancer cell migration and invasion - has been identified as a direct target of miR-10b in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells (Figure 1) [18]. Similar to other miRNAs, the precise function of miR-10b may be tissue specific, which at least in part depends on the expression pattern of its target mRNAs in a given cell type.

miR-10b is a potential target for anti-metastasis therapeutic approaches

Targeting metastasis-promoting miRNAs may represent a novel therapeutic strategy for breast cancer treatment. Among several types of in vivo miRNA antagonists being developed are antagomirs - a type of chemically engineered, cholesterol-conjugated antisense RNA oligo-nucleotide [29, 30]. The effect of the miR-10b antagomir (termed antagomir-10b) was tested in a 4T1 mouse mammary tumor metastasis model: systemic delivery of antagomir-10b had a potent and highly specific metastasis-suppressing effect on these malignant breast cancer cells without affecting their ability to grow as primary tumors - specifically, antagomir-10b blocked dissemination of cancer cells from the primary tumor, but did not affect late stages of the metastatic process after tumor cells had already disseminated. Furthermore, delivery of antagomir-10b to normal tissues did not have substantial toxicity [7]. This work is the first report showing proof-of-principle that antagomirs can be efficiently delivered to rapidly growing metastatic tumor cells in vivo, can specifically silence the miRNA being targeted, and can prevent metastasis formation by other-wise highly malignant cells. The differential effects of antagomir-10b on primary mammary tumor growth, dissemination, and metastatic colonization could be explained by the previous findings that miR-10b specifically promoted breast cancer cell migration and invasion but did not affect proliferation of these cells [6]. This antagomir result also resembles the effect of shRNA-mediated knockdown of Twist, which blocked intravasation of 4T1 tumor cells but did not alter primary tumor growth [31].

In many breast cancer patients, disseminated, circulating tumor cells are readily detectable before surgery [32]. These disseminated tumor cells can later emerge at a secondary site where they grow into a macroscopic tumor (called metastatic recurrence). The current neo-adjuvant therapies used in the breast cancer clinic are mainly intended to shrink the primary disease in order to make the subsequent surgery more complete; however, these existing neoadjuvant therapies may not be effective in blocking metastatic dissemination (RJ Lee and TA Ince, personal communication).

Because the miR-10b antagomir prevents metastatic dissemination but does not affect the late stages of the metastatic process after tumor cells have already disseminated, the main promise for developing an agent such as antagomir-10b as a potential therapy would be whether it can be added during treatment starting in the early stages as a prophylactic therapy against future metastasis formation. Since antagomir-10b does not shrink a primary tumor, it should be combined with other anti-tumor drugs and/or surgical resection of the primary tumor as a neoadjuvant therapeutic strategy, which can be first tested in preclinical models.

Preclinical studies are different from clinical settings. The 4T1 cell line used in the antagomir-10b study was derived from a subset of cancer cells present in the original tumor that are highly metastatic and express high levels of Twist and miR-10b, and thus is expected to respond to silencing of Twist or miR-10b. At the clinical level, as aforementioned, our current knowledge is that miR-10b is upregulated in some metastatic breast tumors. In contrast, miR-10b is expressed at very low levels in early-stage or nonmetastatic breast tumors [6, 10]. Similarly, Twist has been found to be over-expressed in advanced tumors that are metastatic and/or invasive, including invasive lobular breast carcinoma [31], infiltrative gastric cancer [33], metastatic melanoma [34], glioblastoma [35], the aggressive subtype of neuro-blastoma [36], and spindle cell carcinoma of the head and neck [37]. The obvious explanation is that upregulation of Twist and resulting activation of miR-10b expression occur late during primary tumor progression. What, then, is the rationale for giving the miR-10b antagomir to early-stage or nonmetastatic breast tumors, which express low levels of miR-10b?

It should be noted that all these expression analyses were carried out by northern blot or quantitative PCR on whole-tumor specimens. Only a small subset of primary tumor cells is probably responsive to stromal signals by upregulating Twist, resulting in activated expression of miR-10b. Whether a minor subpopulation of cancer cells present in some of the early-stage or nonmetastatic breast tumors express high levels of Twist and miR-10b, utilizing in situ hybridization techniques, remains to be seen. This expression could provide the rationale and selection criteria for treating early-stage or nonmetastatic breast tumors with the miR-10b antagomir, as part of the neoadjuvant regimen.

Conclusions

The present review summarizes evidence for the growing implication of miR-10b miRNA in cancer progression, particularly metastatic progression of breast cancer. The pro-metastatic function of miR-10b has been demonstrated in different xenograft models. Whether this Twist-induced miRNA plays a role in normal development, and whether it is required for metastasis formation in mouse models of spontaneous breast cancer, remain to be determined.

The miR-10b antagomir appears to be a starting point for the development of miRNA-based, anti-metastasis agents, and extensive analyses will be required to determine the efficacy and safety of such agents by using multiple model systems. Because antagomir-10b does not shrink a primary tumor but instead stops its metastatic ability, it would be of interest to use the antagomir in combination with surgical resection to treat breast tumor-bearing mice and to determine whether this combination treatment can lead to both primary tumor removal and prevention from future metastatic relapse. Finally, it is important to develop selection criteria to identify clinical breast tumors that are expected to respond to silencing of miR-10b.

Abbreviations

EMT: 

epithelial-mesenchymal transition

LMP1: 

latent membrane protein-1

miRNA: 

microRNA

MMP: 

matrix metalloproteinase

NF1: 

neurofibromatosis type 1

NOD-SCID: 

nonobese diabetic: severe combined immunodeficient

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

UTR: 

untranslated region.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The author's previous and ongoing work on metastasis-regulating miRNAs is funded by a Life Sciences Research Foundation Fellowship, an NIH Pathway to Independence Award (K99CA138572), a CPRIT First-Time, Tenure-Track Faculty Award, a University of Texas STARS Award, and start-up funding from MD Anderson Cancer Center. The author is grateful to Dr Robert Weinberg and his laboratory members for invaluable advice, and to Dr Richard J Lee and Tan A Ince for personal communications.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA

References

  1. Nguyen DX, Massague J: Genetic determinants of cancer metastasis. Nat Rev Genet. 2007, 8: 341-352. 10.1038/nrg2101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nicoloso MS, Spizzo R, Shimizu M, Rossi S, Calin GA: MicroRNAs - the micro steering wheel of tumour metastases. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 293-302. 10.1038/nrc2619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ma L, Weinberg RA: Micromanagers of malignancy: role of microRNAs in regulating metastasis. Trends Genet. 2008, 24: 448-456. 10.1016/j.tig.2008.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Weigelt B, Peterse JL, van 't Veer LJ: Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 591-602. 10.1038/nrc1670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004, 116: 281-297. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ma L, Teruya-Feldstein J, Weinberg RA: Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer. Nature. 2007, 449: 682-688. 10.1038/nature06174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ma L, Reinhardt F, Pan E, Soutschek J, Bhat B, Marcusson EG, Teruya-Feldstein J, Bell GW, Weinberg RA: Therapeutic silencing of miR-10b inhibits metastasis in a mouse mammary tumor model. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28: 341-347. 10.1038/nbt.1618.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmonds MD, Hurst DR, Vaidya KS, Stafford LJ, Chen D, Welch DR: Breast cancer metastasis suppressor 1 coordinately regulates metastasisassociated microRNA expression. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 1778-1785. 10.1002/ijc.24616.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dykxhoorn DM, Wu Y, Xie H, Yu F, Lal A, Petrocca F, Martinvalet D, Song E, Lim B, Lieberman J: miR-200 enhances mouse breast cancer cell colonization to form distant metastases. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e7181-10.1371/journal.pone.0007181.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Gee HE, Camps C, Buffa FM, Colella S, Sheldon H, Gleadle JM, Ragoussis J, Harris AL: MicroRNA-10b and breast cancer metastasis. Nature. 2008, 455: E8-E9. 10.1038/nature07362. author reply E9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Baffa R, Fassan M, Volinia S, O'Hara B, Liu CG, Palazzo JP, Gardiman M, Rugge M, Gomella LG, Croce CM, Rosenberg A: MicroRNA expression profiling of human metastatic cancers identifies cancer gene targets. J Pathol. 2009, 219: 214-221. 10.1002/path.2586.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tan HX, Wang Q, Chen LZ, Huang XH, Chen JS, Fu XH, Cao LQ, Chen XL, Li W, Zhang LJ: MicroRNA-9 reduces cell invasion and E-cadherin secretion in SK-Hep-1 cell. Med Oncol. 2010, 27: 654-660. 10.1007/s12032-009-9264-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloomston M, Frankel WL, Petrocca F, Volinia S, Alder H, Hagan JP, Liu CG, Bhatt D, Taccioli C, Croce CM: MicroRNA expression patterns to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis. JAMA. 2007, 297: 1901-1908. 10.1001/jama.297.17.1901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciafre SA, Galardi S, Mangiola A, Ferracin M, Liu CG, Sabatino G, Negrini M, Maira G, Croce CM, Farace MG: Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 334: 1351-1358. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Huse JT, Brennan C, Hambardzumyan D, Wee B, Pena J, Rouhanifard SH, Sohn-Lee C, le Sage C, Agami R, Tuschl T, Holland EC: The PTEN-regulating microRNA miR-26a is amplified in high-grade glioma and facilitates gliomagenesis in vivo. Genes Dev. 2009, 23: 1327-1337. 10.1101/gad.1777409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Sasayama T, Nishihara M, Kondoh T, Hosoda K, Kohmura E: MicroRNA-10b is overexpressed in malignant glioma and associated with tumor invasive factors, uPAR and RhoC. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125: 1407-1413. 10.1002/ijc.24522.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chai G, Liu N, Ma J, Li H, Oblinger JL, Prahalad AK, Gong M, Chang LS, Wallace M, Muir D, Guha A, Phipps RJ, Hock JM, Yu X: MicroRNA-10b regulates tumorigenesis in neurofibromatosis type 1. Cancer Sci. 2010,Google Scholar
  18. Tian Y, Luo A, Cai Y, Su Q, Ding F, Chen H, Liu Z: MicroRNA-10b promotes migration and invasion through KLF4 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 7986-7994. 10.1074/jbc.M109.062877.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Li G, Wu Z, Peng Y, Liu X, Lu J, Wang L, Pan Q, He ML, Li XP: MicroRNA-10b induced by Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein-1 promotes the metastasis of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2010, 299: 29-36. 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.07.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Weiss FU, Marques IJ, Woltering JM, Vlecken DH, Aghdassi A, Partecke LI, Heidecke CD, Lerch MM, Bagowski CP: Retinoic acid receptor antagonists inhibit miR-10a expression and block metastatic behavior of pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009, 137: 2136-2145. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gee HE, Camps C, Buffa FM, Patiar S, Winter SC, Betts G, Homer J, Corbridge R, Cox G, West CM, Ragoussis J, Harris AL: hsa-mir-210 is a marker of tumor hypoxia and a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer. Cancer. 2010, 116: 2148-2158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang J, Mani SA, Weinberg RA: Exploring a new twist on tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 4549-4552. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, Tsai MC, Hung T, Argani P, Rinn JL, Wang Y, Brzoska P, Kong B, Li R, West RB, van de Vijver MJ, Kumar S, Chang HY: Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010, 464: 1071-1076. 10.1038/nature08975.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Moriarty CH, Pursell B, Mercurio AM: miR-10b targets Tiam1: implications for Rac activation and carcinoma migration. J Biol Chem. 2010, 285: 20541-20546. 10.1074/jbc.M110.121012.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer N, Penn LZ: Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8: 976-990. 10.1038/nrc2231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Bourguignon LY, Wong G, Earle C, Krueger K, Spevak CC: Hyaluronan-CD44 interaction promotes c-Src-mediated twist signaling, MicroRNA-10b expression and RhoA/RhoC upregulation leading to Rho-kinaseassociated cytoskeleton activation and breast tumor cell invasion. J Biol Chem. 2010,Google Scholar
  27. Rowland BD, Peeper DS: KLF4, p21 and context-dependent opposing forces in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 11-23. 10.1038/nrc1780.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rowland BD, Bernards R, Peeper DS: The KLF4 tumour suppressor is a transcriptional repressor of p53 that acts as a context-dependent oncogene. Nat Cell Biol. 2005, 7: 1074-1082. 10.1038/ncb1314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Krutzfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M: Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with 'antagomirs'. Nature. 2005, 438: 685-689. 10.1038/nature04303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Pena J, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M: Specificity, duplex degradation and subcellular localization of antagomirs. Nucl Acids Res. 2007, 35: 2885-2892. 10.1093/nar/gkm024.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL, Ramaswamy S, Itzykson RA, Come C, Savagner P, Gitelman I, Richardson A, Weinberg RA: Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 2004, 117: 927-939. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ring A, Smith IE, Dowsett M: Circulating tumour cells in breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2004, 5: 79-88. 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01381-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosivatz E, Becker I, Specht K, Fricke E, Luber B, Busch R, Hofler H, Becker KF: Differential expression of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators snail, SIP1, and twist in gastric cancer. Am J Pathol. 2002, 161: 1881-1891.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoek K, Rimm DL, Williams KR, Zhao H, Ariyan S, Lin A, Kluger HM, Berger AJ, Cheng E, Trombetta ES, Wu T, Niinobe M, Yoshikawa K, Hannigan GE, Halaban R: Expression profiling reveals novel pathways in the transformation of melanocytes to melanomas. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 5270-5282. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0731.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Elias MC, Tozer KR, Silber JR, Mikheeva S, Deng M, Morrison RS, Manning TC, Silbergeld DL, Glackin CA, Reh TA, Rostomily RC: TWIST is expressed in human gliomas and promotes invasion. Neoplasia. 2005, 7: 824-837. 10.1593/neo.04352.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Valsesia-Wittmann S, Magdeleine M, Dupasquier S, Garin E, Jallas AC, Combaret V, Krause A, Leissner P, Puisieux A: Oncogenic cooperation between H-Twist and N-Myc overrides failsafe programs in cancer cells. Cancer Cell. 2004, 6: 625-630. 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.09.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kojc N, Zidar N, Gale N, Poljak M, Fujs Komlos K, Cardesa A, Hofler H, Becker KF: Transcription factors Snail, Slug, Twist, and SIP1 in spindle cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Virchows Arch. 2009, 454: 549-555. 10.1007/s00428-009-0771-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2010

Advertisement