Breast imaging technology: Recent advances in imaging endogenous or transferred gene expression utilizing radionuclide technologies in living subjects: applications to breast cancer
© BioMed Central Ltd 2000
Received: 14 November 2000
Accepted: 23 November 2000
Published: 1 December 2000
A variety of imaging technologies is being investigated as tools for studying gene expression in living subjects. Two technologies that use radiolabeled isotopes are single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET). A relatively high sensitivity, a full quantitative tomographic capability, and the ability to extend small animal imaging assays directly into human applications characterize radionuclide approaches. Various radiolabeled probes (tracers) can be synthesized to target specific molecules present in breast cancer cells. These include antibodies or ligands to target cell surface receptors, substrates for intracellular enzymes, antisense oligodeoxynucleotide probes for targeting mRNA, probes for targeting intracellular receptors, and probes for genes transferred into the cell. We briefly discuss each of these imaging approaches and focus in detail on imaging reporter genes. In a PET reporter gene system for in vivo reporter gene imaging, the protein products of the reporter genes sequester positron emitting reporter probes. PET subsequently measures the PET reporter gene dependent sequestration of the PET reporter probe in living animals. We describe and review reporter gene approaches using the herpes simplex type 1 virus thymidine kinase and the dopamine type 2 receptor genes. Application of the reporter gene approach to animal models for breast cancer is discussed. Prospects for future applications of the transgene imaging technology in human gene therapy are also discussed. Both SPECT and PET provide unique opportunities to study animal models of breast cancer with direct application to human imaging. Continued development of new technology, probes and assays should help in the better understanding of basic breast cancer biology and in the improved management of breast cancer patients.
Keywordsanimal models imaging microPET positron emission tomography single photon emission computed tomography
Radionuclide imaging technologies
Radionuclides of interest for positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies
Although the focus of this review is on radionuclide imaging technologies, it is worth briefly reviewing other imaging modalities and how they contrast to PET and SPECT. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)  and computed tomography (CT)  provide high resolution anatomical imaging that is not available through SPECT and PET. Development of new contrast agents for MRI is allowing the study of molecular events, but these approaches are still in the early developmental stage . Magnetic resonance spectroscopy has also extensively been studied and is reviewed in detail elsewhere . Optical approaches for imaging living small animals have been significantly aided by the use of green fluorescent protein  and firefly luciferase . The use of highly sensitive charge-coupled device cameras has provided the ability to detect very low levels of light coming from deep within a living animal. This approach does not produce tomographic images, but provides a rapid, low cost method to detect molecular events using an optical reporter gene.
The advantages of radionuclide technologies and, especially, PET include high sensitivity (~ 10-11 M), which allows for detecting low levels of probes accumulated at a given site. Furthermore, because the isotopes available for PET can substitute for naturally occurring atoms in organic molecules, enormous versatility in the study of biochemistry in vivo is possible. The radionuclide approaches do suffer from a lack of anatomical information that can be provided by the other technologies. Multiple efforts are currently underway to build combined MRI/PET and CT/PET systems . We are performing microPET studies in our laboratories and are starting to use micro-CAT technology (Imtek Inc, Knoxville, TN, USA)  to obtain partially registered anatomical information. Clinical scanners that combine CT and PET have also recently become available and should help to improve overall diagnostic capability .
Radionuclide imaging probes
A key advantage of the radionuclide imaging technologies over other imaging approaches is the ability to label almost any chemical species with an isotope of choice. This has allowed the development of hundreds of radioactive imaging probes capable of imaging a variety of molecular events [2,15].
A potentially useful way to discuss the general categories of probes is to start from targets at the cell membrane and to move to targets within the cell. Two major approaches are available for those genes that lead to expression of a protein on the cell surface. These involve antibodies or antibody fragments to target a specific protein, and specific ligands to target receptors on cells.
Many possibilities for imaging molecular targets exist as one considers targets within a cell. Substrates that are trapped within the cell because they are metabolized by intracellular enzymes can be exploited for imaging purposes. A specific example of this approach is the widely used 2-[18F]-2-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) [15,17], which is actively transported into cells by a glucose membrane transporter. After hexokinase-mediated phosphorylation, phosphorylated FDG (FDG-6-PO4) cannot be further metabolized in the glucose metabolic pathway and is not able to leave the cell, leading to intracellular trapping of the radiolabeled compound [2,15] Breast carcinomas, like many cancers, show noticeable increased glucose metabolism, leading to a pronounced intracellular accumulation of FDG relative to surrounding tissues. FDG-PET can provide helpful information in the multimodality evaluation of breast lesions, therapy response and extent of metastatic disease. The inability to detect very small tumors (<4 mm diameter) and the varying metabolic activity of the different tumor subtypes in breast cancer  cause some limitations.
[11C]-Methionine, a proliferation marker capable of detecting changes in the amino acid metabolism of tumors, might have an impact in predicting treatment response, but at present very little data in breast cancer patients are available .
In vivo imaging of intracellular receptors has also been reported. The growth of breast epithelial cells is an estrogen-mediated process that depends on estrogen acting through an estrogen receptor (ER) and results in the induction of progestin receptor. The assay of the levels of these two receptors is important because it is considered indicative of the responsiveness of a tumor to hormonal agents . The ER content of breast carcinomas is also known to be an important prognostic indicator. Successful research has focused mainly on imaging of estrogen receptors. [18F]-Fluoro-17β-estradiol has high affinity for the ER, and an excellent correlation has been noted between the tumoral uptake of this estradiol on PET images and the tumor ER concentration measured in vitro .
Principles of imaging reporter gene expression
Molecular biologists have long used reporter genes to study promoter/regulatory elements involved in gene expression, inducible promoters to examine the transduction of gene expression, and transgenes containing endogenous promoters fused to a reporter gene to study endogenous gene expression. This is a highly general approach because any promoter can be fused to a reporter gene, and detection of a reporter gene product is a way of 'indirectly' following the expression of the gene that the chosen promoter normally regulates. Once a reporter gene driven by a promoter of choice is introduced into the desired tissue, expression of the reporter gene can be monitored by several conventional methods like tissue biopsy, followed by immunohistochemistry. Conventional methods to detect reporter gene expression are, however, limited by their inability to determine 'non-invasively' the locations and magnitude of gene expression in living subjects over time. Approaches using green fluorescent protein  and firefly luciferase  as reporter genes allow localization of reporter gene expression in some living animals, but monitoring of the detailed location and magnitude of reporter gene expression over time is difficult. Approaches using MRI are reviewed elsewhere .
The choice of a promoter for driving reporter gene expression depends on the intended application. Constitutive promoters can be used to produce continuous transcription of the reporter gene. Inducible promoters can be used to provide external control for varying the levels of transcription. To mimic the transcription of some endogenous gene, one can use the identical promoter of the endogenous gene to be imaged. This allows the use of reporter genes to indirectly monitor the expression of an endogenous gene. Two reporter gene approaches are discussed: the herpes simplex type 1 virus thymidine kinase (HSV1-tk) and the dopamine type 2 receptor (D2R). Other approaches have also been developed and are reviewed elsewhere [24,25].
The HSV1-tk gene (HSV1-TK is the corresponding enzyme) has its roots in a therapeutic approach as a 'suicide gene' [25,26]. HSV1-TK, like murine and human TK, phosphorylates thymidine. HSV1-TK, however, phosphorylates acycloguanosines (eg acyclovir, ganciclovir, penciclovir) much more effectively than do mammalian TKs. Cellular enzymes then convert the acycloguanosine monophosphates to diphosphates and triphosphates that, if present in sufficient concentration, kill cells by incorporation as chain-terminating derivatives or by direct inhibition of DNA polymerase. Because HSV1-TK converts acycloguanosine prodrugs to toxic compounds, this approach is used in cancer gene therapy protocols as a suicide gene approach . The actual approach is to deliver the HSV1-tk gene to tumor cells, then use acycloguanosines to kill the cells expressing HSV1-tk. The relaxed substrate specificity by the viral TK is critical in the approach of HSV1-tk suicide gene therapy, but can also be exploited using the HSV1-tk gene in an imaging approach.
Two main categories of substrates, uracil nucleoside derivatives and acycloguanosine derivatives, have been investigated specifically as reporter probes for imaging HSV1-tk reporter gene expression for SPECT and PET. These reporter probes are transported into cells, and trapped as a result of enzymatic phosphorylation by HSV1-TK. The choice of acycloguanosine derivatives (eg ganciclovir) as potential reporter probes was based on their ability to be radiolabeled with 18F, which has several ideal characteristics as an isotope . The reporter probe is only used in tracer doses (not in pharmacological doses as in suicide therapy), so there are no known problems concerning cell toxicity.
Potential applications of the reporter gene technologies developed for the study of breast cancer models are numerous. It should now be possible to mark any breast cancer cell line with a reporter gene for subsequent imaging of cell trafficking in living animals. Stable transfection of the reporter gene into a given cell line is possible using plasmids carrying the reporter gene, and antibiotic selection markers or viral vectors with subsequent selection of cell lines stably expressing the reporter gene. Once available, these cells can be directly implanted to study cell growth and trafficking with or without pharmacological intervention. Several models are now under study in which breast cancer metastases can be monitored non-invasively over time. Transgenic mice can also be developed in which a breast tissue specific promoter drives the reporter gene. This allows the study of spontaneous tumors as they develop and metastasize. The reporter genes also provide a unique way to optimize gene therapy through tracking the delivered genes, and are now discussed in detail.
Gene therapy applications
Several gene therapeutic approaches to breast cancer treatment have been considered. A very important strategy is the attempt to correct or compensate specific genetic defects in breast cancer cells. Such efforts to compensate mutations include ablation of oncogenic products, restoration of receptor expression (eg estrogen receptor expression), alteration of genes involved in the induction of apoptosis, or activation of tumor suppressor genes [35,36]. Mutations in the p53 gene are among the very common changes in breast cancer . Wild type p53 functions as a tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer cells, as shown by the growth suppression of cells in vitro when transfected with wild type expression vectors . Retroviral delivery of wild type p53 into human breast cancer cells suppresses tumorigenicity in nude mice .
Hung et al  developed a phase I clinical trial of E1A gene therapy targeting Her-2/neu overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer. HER2/neu overexpression in breast cancer is considered linked with lower response to chemotherapy and unfavorable prognosis. This group identified a viral transcriptional regulator, the adenovirus type 5 E1A, that can repress HER-2/neu overexpression. Expression of E1A in HER-2/neu overexpressing cancer cells resulted in downregulation of HER-2/neu in vitro, which reversed the malignant phenotype and restored sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Preclinical in vivo studies showed that the E1A gene was able to function therapeutically as a tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer xenograft models. In the phase I clinical trial, Hung et al showed that the E1A gene can be delivered to cancer cells by a cationic liposomal delivery system. HER-2/neu was downregulated and the E1A gene induced apoptosis. A general drawback of the mutation compensation approach is that transfection of most of the tumor cells is needed to obtain a clinical effect, because intracellular responses are being modulated without effect on surrounding non-transfected cells.
Approaches such as molecular chemotherapy (shows a regional 'bystander effect') or immune therapy (has the potential to generate a systemic response) hold even more promise for becoming the breast cancer therapies of the future . Molecular chemotherapy aims to increase the sensitivity of the tumor cells to chemotherapy or to find more specific ways of drug delivery to tumor cells . The most studied system to accomplish cell killing uses the already discussed TK gene from the herpes simplex virus and gangiclovir as a prodrug.
Tumor specificity of molecular chemotherapy can be enhanced through the use of transductional or transcriptional targeting. Transductional targeting directs viral gene delivery vectors specifically to tumor cells, which express unique epitopes like erbB2 or the mucin protein core. Transcriptional targeting may be accomplished through the use of breast or tumor specific promoters such as Muc-1, HER-2, Myc and others .
Imaging modalities to verify the location, magnitude and duration of transgene expression are highly recommended in all these approaches, and will be very useful in attempts to optimize gene therapy protocols in general and time of prodrug application in particular.
A third strategy, genetic immunotherapy , aims to augment the specificity and magnitude of the immune response against tumor-associated antigens. These therapies include passive and active immunization, introduction of cytokines, and expression of T cell costimulatory molecules . An advantage of this approach is not having to introduce the therapeutic gene into all metastatic sites. The use of cytokines for immunotherapy has been limited by the toxicities associated with systemic administration of the proteins. Recombinant adenoviral vectors containing various cytokine genes have been used to deliver high local concentrations of the cytokines intratumorally. In a subcutaneous model of metastatic breast cancer in transgenic mice, direct intratumoral injection of an adenoviral vector expressing IL-12 resulted in tumor regression in 75% of the treated animals . Adenoviral-mediated gene delivery of IL-2 was recently evaluated in a phase I clinical trial in metastatic breast cancer and melanoma patients, showing the safety of this approach .
Given the magnitude of breast cancer as a clinical problem, however, few gene therapy clinical trials have until now been initiated. The exceptional heterogeneous molecular biology of this cancer, production of immuno-suppressive factors, and the widespread nature of the disease are three examples of the difficulties faced in breast cancer gene therapy . Recent advances in understanding the molecular cell biology underlying breast cancer nevertheless revealed several potentially clinically useful gene therapy approaches for the near future.
Non-invasive imaging of transgene expression will be of great benefit in assessing organ tissue specificity as well as level and duration of transgene expression in vivo, and could therefore be very useful in validation of new delivery systems as well as in monitoring clinical gene therapy trials. Most therapeutic transgenes do not lend themselves to direct imaging of the transgene product. Most therapeutic transgene products lack appropriate ligands or probes that can be radiolabeled and used to generate images that define the magnitude of transgene expression. It would also be very difficult to develop and validate new ligands and probes for each therapeutic transgene. Alternatively, it is reasonable to develop and validate indirect imaging strategies using a reporter gene in combination with a therapeutic gene.
The future potential of radionuclide assays with SPECT and, particularly, PET imaging is quite promising. As small animal imaging technologies continue to spread to major research centers and the development of general probes expands, animal research should be significantly accelerated. The study of breast cancer cell trafficking and basic tumor biology in xenograft and transgenic models should be possible. Optimization of gene therapy should also be possible. The results from animal models should be rapidly translated into human applications because of a rapidly growing base of imaging scanners, which should lead to improved diagnosis and management of breast cancer patients.
The authors would like to thank Drs H Herschman, MPhelps, JR Barrio, S Cherry, N Satyamurthy, T Toyokuni, L Wu and A Wu for their collaborative efforts in much of the work described in the paper. We would also like to thank the many undergraduate and graduate students as well as post-doctoral fellows who helped with some of the studies reviewed in this paper
This work is supported in part by US Army DAMD 17-98-1-8179, Department of Energy DE-FC03-87ER60615, NIH RO1 CA82214-01, and NIH CA86306; Frank Berger is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
- Budinger TF: Critical review of PET, SPECT and neuroreceptor studies in schizophrenia. J Neural Transm. 1992, 36(suppl): 3-12.Google Scholar
- Phelps ME: Inaugural article: positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 9226-9233. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9226.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fleming JS, Alaamer AS: Influence of collimator characteristics on quantification in SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1996, 37: 1832-1836.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freifelder R, Karp JS: Dedicated PET scanners for breast imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1997, 42: 2463-2480. 10.1088/0031-9155/42/12/012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherry SR, Shao Y, Silverman RW, Meadors K, Siegel S, Chatziioannou A, Young JW, Jones WF, Moyers JC, Newport D, Boutefnouchet A, Farquhar TH, Andreaco M, Paulus MJ, Binkley DM, Nutt R, Phelps ME: MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1997, 44: 1161-1166. 10.1109/23.596981.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson EF, Ginsberg LE, Schomer DF, Leeds NE: A review of MRI pulse sequences and techniques in neuroimaging. Surg Neurol. 1997, 47: 185-199. 10.1016/S0090-3019(96)00375-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hopper KD, Singapuri K, Finkel A: Body CT and oncologic imaging. Radiology. 2000, 215: 27-40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bogdanov A, Weissleder R: The development of in vivo imaging systems to study gene expression. Trends Biotechnol. 1998, 16: 5-10. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01150-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rudin M, Beckmann N, Porszasz R, Reese T, Bochelen D, Sauter A: In vivo magnetic resonance methods in pharmaceutical research: current status and perspectives. NMR Biomed. 1999, 12: 69-97. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199904)12:2<69::AID-NBM548>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang M, Baranov E, Moossa AR, Penman S, Hoffman RM: Visualizing gene expression by whole-body fluorescence imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 12278-12282. 10.1073/pnas.97.22.12278.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Contag PR, Olomu IN, Stevenson DK, Contag CH: Bioluminescent indicators in living mammals. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 245-247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K, Slates R, Silverman RW, Meadors K, Bowery A, Siegel S, Marsden PK, Garlick PB: Development of a PET detector system compatible with MRI/NMR systems. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1997, 44: 1167-1171. 10.1109/23.596982.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Paulus MJ, Gleason SS, Kennel SJ, Hunsicker PR, Johnson DK: High resolution X-ray computed tomography: an emerging tool for small animal cancer research. Neoplasia. 2000, 2: 62-70. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900069.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, Jerin J, Young J, Byars L, Nutt R: A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 2000, 41: 1369-1379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phelps M: PET: the merging of biology and imaging into molecular imaging. J Nucl Med. 2000, 41: 661-681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu AM: Designer genes: recombinant antibody fragments for biological imaging. Q J Nucl Med. 2000, 44: 268-283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higashi K, Clavo AC, Wahl RL: Does FDG uptake measure the proliferative activity of human cancer cells? In vitro comparison with DNA flow cytometry and tritiated thymidine uptake. J Nucl Med. 1993, 34: 414-418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Avril N, Rose CA, Schelling M, Dose J, Kuhn W, Bense S, Weber W, Ziegler S, Graeff H, Schwaiger M: Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18: 3495-3502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huovinen R, Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Ruotsalainen U, Teras M: Carbon-11-methionine and PET in evaluation of treatment response of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 1993, 67: 787-791.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Varagnolo L, Stokkel MP, Mazzi U, Pauwels EK: 18F-Labeled radiopharmaceuticals for PET in oncology, excluding FDG. Nucl Med Biol. 2000, 27: 103-112. 10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00109-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mintun MA, Welch MJ, Siegel BA, Mathias CJ, Brodack JW, McGuire AH, Katzenellenbogen JA: Breast cancer: PET imaging of estrogen receptors. Radiology. 1988, 169: 45-48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crooke ST, Lebleu B: Antisense Research and Applications. Ann Arbor: CRC Press, Inc.,. 1993, 579-Google Scholar
- Gambhir SS, Barrio JR, Herschman HR, Phelps ME: Imaging gene expression: principles and assays. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999, 6: 219-233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rogers BE, Zinn KR, Buchsbaum DJ: Gene transfer strategies for improving radiolabeled peptide imaging and therapy. Q J Nucl Med. 2000, 44: 208-223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gambhir SS, Herschman HR, Cherry SR, Barrio JR, Satyamurthy N, Toyokuni T, Phelps ME, Larson SM, Balatoni J, Finn R, Sadelain M, Tjuvajev J, Blasberg R: Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies. Neoplasia. 2000, 2: 118-138. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900083.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moolten FL: Suicide genes for cancer therapy. Sci Med. 1997, 4: 16-25.Google Scholar
- Gambhir SS, Barrio JR, Herschman HR, Phelps ME: Assays for noninvasive imaging of reporter gene expression. Nucl Med Biol. 1999, 26: 481-490. 10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00021-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gambhir SS, Barrio J, Wu L, Iyer M, Namavari M, Satyamurthy N, Bauer E, Parrish C, MacLaren D, Borghei A, Berk A, Cherry S, Phelps ME, Herschman H: Imaging of adenoviral directed herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase gene expression in mice with ganciclovir. J Nucl Med. 1998, 39: 2003-2011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tjuvajev JG, Joshi R, Lindsley L, Balatoni J, Finn R, Larson S, Sadelain M, Blasberg R: Noninvasive imaging of HSV1-tk marker gene with FIAU for monitoring transfer and expression of other therapeutic genes by multi-gene delivery vectors [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 1998, 39: 130P-Google Scholar
- Tjuvajev JG, Chen SH, Joshi A, Joshi R, Guo ZS, Balatoni J, Ballon D, Koutcher J, Finn R, Woo SL, Blasberg RG: Imaging adenoviral-mediated herpes virus thymidine kinase gene transfer expression in vivo. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 5186-5193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gambhir SS, Bauer E, Black ME, Liang Q, Kokoris MS, Barrio JR, Iyer M, Namavari M, Satyamurthy N, Green LA, Nguyen K, Cherry SR, Phelps ME, Herschman HR: A mutant herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase reporter gene shows improved sensitivity for imaging reporter gene expression with positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 2785-2790. 10.1073/pnas.97.6.2785.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Barrio JR, Huang SC, Phelps ME: Biological imaging and the molecular basis of dopaminergic diseases. Biochem Pharmacol. 1997, 54: 341-348. 10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00031-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacLaren DC, Gambhir SS, Satyamurthy N, Barrio JR, Sharfstein S, Toyokuni T, Wu L, Berk AJ, Cherry SR, Phelps ME, Herschman HR: Repetitive, non-invasive imaging of the dopamine D2 receptor as a reporter gene in living animals. Gene Ther. 1999, 6: 785-791. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iyer M, Bauer E, Barrio J, Iyer M, Namavari M, Satyamurthy N, Green LA, Nguyen K, Phelps ME, Herschman HR, Gambhir SS: 8-[18F]Fluoropenciclovir: an improved reporter probe for imaging HSV1-tk reporter gene expression in vivousing positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. Google Scholar
- Ruppert JMWM, Rosenfeld M, Grushcow J, Bilbao G, Curiel DT, Strong TV: Gene therapy strategies for carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997, 44: 93-114. 10.1023/A:1005761723853.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boxhorn HK, Eck SL: Gene therapy for breast cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1998, 12: 665-675.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Phillips H: The role of the p53 tumour suppressor gene in human breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999, 11: 148-155. 10.1053/clon.1999.9032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang NP, To H, Lee WH, Lee EY: Tumor suppressor activity of RB and p53 genes in human breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 1993, 8: 279-288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT: Development of clinical trial of E1A gene therapy targeting HER-2/neu-overexpressing breast and ovarian cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000, 465: 171-180.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patterson A, Harris AL: Molecular chemotherapy for breast cancer. Drugs Aging. 1999, 14: 75-90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bramson JL, Hitt M, Addison CL, Muller WJ, Gauldie J, Graham FL: Direct intratumoral injection of an adenovirus expressing interleukin-12 induces regression and long-lasting immunity that is associated with highly localized expression of interleukin-12. Hum Gene Ther. 1996, 7: 1995-2002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stewart AK, Lassam NJ, Quirt IC, Bailey DJ, Rotstein LE, Krajden M, Dessureault S, Gallinger S, Cappe D, Wan Y, Addison CL, Moen RC, Gauldie J, Graham FL: Adenovector-mediated gene delivery of interleukin-2 in metastatic breast cancer and melanoma: results of a phase 1 clinical trial. Gene Ther. 1999, 6: 350-363. 10.1038/sj.gt.3300833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu Y, Annala AJ, Barrio JR, Toyokuni T, Satyamurthy N, Namavari M, Cherry SR, Phelps ME, Herschman HR, Gambhir SS: Quantification of target gene expression by imaging reporter gene expression in living animals. Nat Med. 2000, 6: 933-937. 10.1038/78704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yaghoubi S, Liang Q, Barrio JR, Namavari M, Satyamurthy S, Toyokuni T, Black M, Phelps ME, Herschman HR, Gambhir SS: Assessment of gene expression utilizing two adenoviral vectors and positron emission tomography [abstract]. FASEB. 2000, 14: A568-Google Scholar