Skip to main content
Download PDF

The role of surgical tissue injury and intraoperative sympathetic activation in postoperative immunosuppression after breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a prospective observational study

Breast Cancer Research volume 26, Article number: 42 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is the second most common cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Counterintuitively, large population-based retrospective trials report better survival after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy, corrected for tumour- and patient variables. More extensive surgical tissue injury and activation of the sympathetic nervous system by nociceptive stimuli are associated with immune suppression. We hypothesized that mastectomy causes a higher expression of plasma damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and more intraoperative sympathetic activation which induce postoperative immune dysregulation. Immune suppression can lead to postoperative complications and affect tumour-free survival.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, plasma DAMPs (HMGB1, HSP70, S100A8/A9 and S100A12), intraoperative sympathetic activation (Nociception Level (NOL) index from 0 to 100), and postoperative immune function (plasma cytokine concentrations and ex vivo cytokine production capacity) were compared in patients undergoing elective BCS (n = 20) versus mastectomy (n = 20).

Results

Ex vivo cytokine production capacity of TNF, IL-6 and IL-1β was nearly absent in both groups one hour after surgery. Levels appeared recovered on postoperative day 3 (POD3), with significantly higher ex vivo production capacity of IL-1β after BCS (p = .041) compared to mastectomy. Plasma concentration of IL-6 was higher one hour after mastectomy (p = .045). Concentrations of plasma alarmins S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were significantly higher on POD3 after mastectomy (p = .003 and p = .041, respectively). Regression analysis showed a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 (absence of nociception) during mastectomy when corrected for norepinephrine equivalents (36% versus 45% respectively, p = .038). Percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 of all patients correlated with ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β and TNF on POD3 (r = .408; p = .011 and r = .500; p = .001, respectively).

Conclusions

This pilot study revealed substantial early postoperative immune suppression after BCS and mastectomy that appears to recover in the following days. Differences between BCS and mastectomy in release of DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation could affect postoperative immune homeostasis and thereby contribute to the better survival reported after BCS in previous large population-based retrospective trials. These results endorse further exploration of (1) S100 alarmins as potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer surgery and (2) suppression of intraoperative sympathetic activation to substantiate the observed association with postoperative immune dysregulation.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and is the second most common cause of death from cancer among women in the world [1]. Several large population-based retrospective trials have investigated survival rates between breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. Most of these trials report superior survival in the breast-conserving surgery group [2,3,4,5,6]. However, it is critical to acknowledge the potential for selection bias inherent to these retrospective analyses, as they may not fully account for patient-specific factors such as mobility and frailty which can influence treatment decisions. This discovery, while reported consistently, is not geographically bound, nor age dependent, and has been adjusted for all tumor- and patient variables available in the cancer registration database [7]. Nonetheless, the retrospective nature of these trials necessitates a cautious interpretation of this association.

There is no straightforward explanation why limited surgery for early-stage breast cancer could lead to a better survival in comparison to mastectomy, and thus these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive. A possible contributing factor to this observation is radiotherapy, since the majority of patients undergoing BCS receive radiotherapy, as opposed to fewer patients after mastectomy [8]. Furthermore, there is a larger degree of surgical trauma in mastectomy, which is associated with increased odds of developing a postoperative complication [9]. Complication rates are already low after breast cancer surgery. Still, a recent study also showed that mastectomy has higher medical and surgical postoperative complication rates than BCS [10]. A plausible hypothesis emerging in recent literature is that more extensive surgical trauma could lead to immune dysregulation. Cell damage leads to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), substances either actively released by cells under threat, or components of the cell exposed when a cell is injured [11, 12]. DAMPs function as ligands for Toll-like receptors that, upon binding, induce inflammation followed by a compensatory state of immune suppression [11, 13]. In addition, activation of the sympathetic nervous system by nociceptive stimuli is known to induce immune suppression [14, 15]. More surgical trauma could lead to more pain and a higher degree of intraoperative sympathetic activation, which can easily be quantified with a non-invasive monitor [16]. Fragidiakis et al. describe a strong correlation between immune status and recovery from surgery [17]. In trauma patients, the suppressed immune state has been linked to infectious complications and mortality [18,19,20].

Several DAMPs have been linked to postoperative immune suppression and infectious complications (High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) and Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70)) [21], and breast cancer (alarmins S100A8/A9 and S100A12) [22,23,24]. While functions and interactions of individual DAMPs have not been comprehensively characterized, in general HMGB1 and HSP70 reflect the degree of surgical injury or tissue damage, while increased S100A8/9 and S100A12 are associated with morbidity and mortality [25] and cancer progression [26,27,28,29,30]. The aim of this pilot study was to further explore the role of these DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation in immune suppression after breast cancer surgery, and to investigate whether these factors are likely to contribute to the previously reported difference in survival between BCS and mastectomy. We hypothesized that more extensive surgical trauma and sympathetic activation during mastectomy are associated with more immune suppression, which in turn may lead to postoperative complications and affect survival.

Materials and methods

Study population

Women undergoing elective BCS or mastectomy at the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital (CWZ) in Nijmegen in the Netherlands were included in this single-centre prospective pilot study in 2021–2022. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years of age or unwilling to give informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee “CMO region Arnhem-Nijmegen” (NL65918.091.18). Randomization was not applicable as only patients who were already scheduled to undergo either BCS or mastectomy were included. Participation in the study did not alter or delay the already scheduled treatment in any way. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants before the start of any study-related procedures. Determinations and data handling were performed in agreement with the guidelines of The National Institutes of Health and in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Sample and data collection

Baseline-, tumour-, and treatment characteristics and perioperative parameters were obtained from digital patient files in the programme Healthcare Information eXchange (HiX). Pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 0–10, 10 worst pain score)) at one hour after surgery were obtained by attending nurses at the recovery. Blood samples were taken before surgery, 1 hour after surgery, and 3 days after surgery. Lithium heparin (LH) anti-coagulated blood was drawn for ex vivo endotoxin stimulation of leukocytes immediately after sampling and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) anti-coagulated blood was obtained to measure plasma DAMP levels and cytokine concentrations. After blood withdrawal, both LH and EDTA anti-coagulated blood samples were centrifuged at 1,600 RCF at 4 °C for 10 min. EDTA anti-coagulated plasma samples were centrifuged again at 16,000 RCF at 4 °C for 10 min to remove potential remaining cells and cell debris. Plasma was stored at -80 °C until further analysis.

Plasma DAMP and cytokine concentrations

Plasma concentrations of HMGB1 were measured batchwise using the HMGB1 Express ELISA according to the manufacturers protocol (TECAN, Männedorf, Switzerland, catalogue number 30,164,033). HSP70, S100A8/A9, and S100A12 plasma concentrations were measured using Human HSP70/HSPA1A, Human S100A8/S100A9 Heterodimer, and Human EN-RAGE DuoSet ELISAs according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, catalogue numbers DY1663-05, DY8226-05, and DY1052-05 respectively). Concentrations of TNF, IL-6 and IL-10 were measured batchwise in plasma from EDTA anti-coagulated blood using a simultaneous Luminex assay (Milliplex; Millipore, Billerica, MA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Ex vivo cytokine production upon whole blood stimulation

Ex vivo cytokine production capacity upon lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation was measured as previously described [19, 21, 31]. In short, 0.5 mL whole LH anti-coagulated blood was added to tubes with 2 mL Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium as negative control or 2 mL RPMI culture medium supplemented with 12.5 ng/mL Escherichia coli LPS (serotype O55:B5 Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA), end concentration 10 ng/mL. These tubes were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Next, the samples were centrifuged at 3000 RPM and 24 °C for 5 min and supernatants were stored at -80 °C until further analysis. Concentrations of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF, IL-6 and anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in the supernatants were measured using Human Bio-Techne R&D DuoSet ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). The plates were read at 450 nm using a ELx808 BioTek plate reader.

Anaesthesia and nociception level

Anaesthesia was given according to the local standardized hospital protocol for breast surgery and consisted of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol. Analgesia consisted of acetaminophen, diclofenac and intravenous morphine. During surgery, all patients were connected to a Nociception Level (NOL) monitor (Medasense Biometrics Ltd, Ramat Gan, Israel) by a finger probe that can detect and quantify mild to intense noxious stimulation. Using a validated algorithm, this monitor combines the physiological parameters heart rate, heart rate variability, plethysmograph wave amplitude, skin conductance level, number of skin conductance fluctuations, and their time into a single index: the NOL index [32]. Index values ranging from 0 (no nociception) to 100 (extreme nociception) were measured every 5 seconds and collected on the hard disc of the monitor until they were extracted for analysis. Generally, NOL values below 10 are considered absence of nociception [33, 34]. As median NOL values of 11–13 are reported during surgery (34), a NOL ≤ 8 was chosen as the cut-off value for this trial. The anaesthesiologist was blinded to the NOL index, measurements were not used to guide treatment in any way. Use of vasopressors (ephedrine, phenylephrine and norepinephrine were converted to norepinephrine equivalents [35]) was recorded to correct for increases in the NOL index secondary to the resulting increase in blood pressure and/or heart rate in ANCOVA.

Statistical analysis

This pilot study will be used to determine estimated effects of BCS and mastectomy on measures of interest and plan subsequent studies. Therefore, no sample size calculation was performed. Data presented in tables and text are presented as mean with standard deviation (SD). Data presented in figures are expressed as mean with standard error of the mean (SEM). Independent samples T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to determine differences between the groups (BCS versus mastectomy) for each of the time points. Linear regression analysis was used to determine differences in nociception level index corrected for use of vasopressors. Furthermore, repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction were performed to determine differences between the different timepoints within each group. Cytokine levels below the detection limit as determined by ELISA were considered equal to the lowest detectable concentration because these values were expected to be very low. Haemolytic blood samples were excluded from the analysis of DAMP levels because haemolysis has been described to influence the accuracy of the results and the reliability of laboratory testing [36, 37]. Correlations were determined using Pearson’s correlation.

All figures were made using GraphPad Prism version 5.03 and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.4.1 and SPSS version 27. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

From February 2021 until June 2022, 20 women undergoing BCS and 20 women undergoing mastectomy at the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital in the Netherlands were included in this study. Baseline characteristics age, BMI, and ASA score were similar between groups (Table 1). Incidence of invasive lobular carcinoma was more prevalent in the mastectomy group while invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST) was more prevalent in the breast-conserving surgery group. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy occurred more frequently in the mastectomy group while frequency of administration of hormone therapy was similar between groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Anaesthesia and pain

Total doses of anaesthesia and analgesia in units per hour administered during surgery did not differ between the groups (Table 2). However, duration of surgery was significantly longer for mastectomy compared to breast-conserving surgery (89 versus 58 min, P < .001). Pain and morphine consumption at the recovery room were significantly higher after mastectomy (Table 2).

Table 2 Anaesthesia and pain
Full size table

Innate immune function

Concentrations of DAMPs in plasma did not differ between the groups at baseline and one hour after surgery. However, on postoperative day 3 (POD3), concentrations of S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were significantly higher in patients after mastectomy (Fig. 1). Plasma concentrations of IL-6 were significantly higher one hour after mastectomy compared to BCS (Fig. 2). No other differences in plasma cytokine concentrations were detected between groups. In all patients collectively, strong immunosuppression was observed at one hour after surgery indicated by a significant decrease to nearly absent ex vivo production capacity of TNF, IL-6 and IL-1 β. Ex vivo cytokine production capacity appeared restored three days after surgery, ex vivo production of IL-1β upon endotoxin stimulation was significantly higher in the mastectomy group on POD3 (Fig. 3). No baseline differences were found for the assessed parameters between patients with and without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, exclusion of patients with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy did not alter the results.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Concentrations of damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in plasma before surgery, one hour (1 h) and three days (3d) after surgery. Data are presented as mean ± standard error. HSP70: heat shock protein 70, HMGB1: high mobility group box 1, S100A12: S100 calcium-binding protein A12, S100A8/A9: calprotectin

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Plasma cytokine concentrations before surgery, one hour (1 h) and three days (3d) after surgery. Data are presented as mean ± standard error. IL: interleukin; TNF: tumour necrosis factor

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Ex vivo cytokine production capacity of leukocytes upon whole blood stimulation with E. coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) before, one hour (1 h) and three days (3d) after surgery. Data are presented as mean ± standard error. IL: interleukin; TNF: tumour necrosis factor

Full size image

NOL index

The mean observed NOL index for all 40 patients combined was 13 ± 5. The percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 correlated with ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β and TNF on POD3 (r = .408, p = .011 and r = .500, p = .001, respectively). Linear regression analysis shows patients undergoing mastectomy had a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 compared to patients undergoing BCS (36% versus 45%, respectively, p = .038) when corrected for norepinephrine equivalents by ANCOVA. Patients who developed a wound infection within 30 days after surgery (n = 3, one in the BCS group and two in the mastectomy group) had a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 (19% versus 42%, p = .023). The mean NOL and percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 did not correlate with pain scores at the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU).

Discussion

In this pilot study, the role of DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation in postoperative immune suppression after breast cancer surgery were explored to investigate whether these factors are likely to contribute to greater survival after BCS compared to mastectomy, as reported in previous large population based retrospective trials.

Plasma alarmins S100A12 and S100A8/A9 were significantly increased on postoperative day 3 after mastectomy as compared to BCS. During inflammation, S100A12 and S100A8/A9 are known to modulate the immune inflammatory response by stimulation of leukocyte recruitment and induction of cytokine secretion [39, 40]. The increased levels after mastectomy could be related to wound healing as there is a greater wound surface after mastectomy. Considering the association of high S100A12 and S100A8/A9 with worse prognosis in breast cancer and other types of cancer [25,26,27,28,29], this could be a contributing factor to the observed difference in survival in previous observational studies. Regulation of S100 alarmins as therapeutic targets in inflammatory disease is an upcoming area of research [41]. For both groups, HMGB1 and HSP70 were not significantly increased one hour and 3 days after surgery compared to before surgery. This was an unexpected finding, as several previous studies report an increase in these DAMPs after different types of surgery [21, 42,43,44]. Either the expression of these DAMPs is simply not increased after breast cancer surgery, or possibly the window of increase was outside the measured timepoints. There were also no differences between BCS and mastectomy for HMGB1 and HSP70.

Plasma IL-6 was significantly higher 1 hour after surgery for the mastectomy group. IL-6 is a major regulator of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) that suppress the anti-tumour functions of T and NK-cells. High plasma IL-6 is therefore associated with a worse prognosis as it leads to increased tumour cell proliferation and metastasis [45,46,47]. Additionally, more extensive surgical trauma and sympathetic activation during mastectomy may cause greater adrenergic and prostaglandin responses, which also affect immune function. Acute stress can promote the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-1β, while chronic stress can also contribute to immunosuppression [48]. This is in line with the current study as higher NOL values and higher plasma concentrations of IL-6 1 hour after mastectomy were found compared to breast-conserving surgery. Plasma TNF and IL-10 were not significantly different between BCS and mastectomy 1 hour and 3 days after surgery.

It is well recognized that the early postoperative immune response is predominantly immunosuppressive [49]. Leijte et al. [21] and Albers et al. [44] have previously described the association between DAMPs and ex vivo cytokine production capacity. Nonetheless, the fact that the ex vivo cytokine production capacity (regarded as the capacity to elicit an inflammatory response when encountering a pathogen [50]) is nearly absent one hour after surgery has not been described before. The observed levels were comparable to levels in patients displaying a state of immunoparalysis after sepsis [50, 51]. Whether this is the direct result of anaesthetics or intraoperative circulating DAMPs is still unknown. Anaesthetics commonly used in surgery have a direct effect on the functions of immunocompetent cells [52]. Propofol impairs several monocyte and neutrophil functions and remifentanil also presents strong immunomodulatory effects [53]. In general, the effects of anaesthetics appeared to be moderate to even negligible to the effects of surgical trauma in healthy patients anesthetized for short procedures [53, 54]. However, the newly identified tremendous depression of cytokine production capacity directly after surgery in patients with cancer and often other comorbidities perhaps calls for a re-evaluation of the role of anaesthetics in postoperative complications. Curiously, while ex vivo production capacity of IL-1β is approximately back to baseline on POD3 for mastectomy, it is significantly higher on POD3 after BCS. IL-1β, being a potent pro-inflammatory cytokine crucial to the host-defence against invading pathogens, is usually not detectable in plasma of healthy individuals [55, 56]. Higher production capacity upon endotoxin stimulation therefore indicates improved protection against postoperative infectious complications. IL-1β appears to have opposing functions in breast cancer, as high levels in the tumour micro-environment inhibit tumour growth while on the other hand it seems to enhance metastasis in bone [57]. Altogether, this study investigates only a small subset of DAMPs and a fraction of the innate immune response. Considering the small sample size and the pilot character of the study there is no foundation for hard conclusions. Also, our ex vivo findings should be interpreted with caution as this approach does not take in to account all factors present in the in vivo situation, such as stress hormones [58]. Nonetheless, the significant immune-related differences identified between BCS and mastectomy do suggest the type of surgery is substantive for the postoperative course and prognosis.

Intra-operative activation of the sympathetic nervous system (e.g. stress or nociception during general anaesthesia) could very well also contribute to the observed differences between BCS and mastectomy. More extensive surgical tissue injury understandably leads to more nociceptive activation. Morisson et al. previously described that the percentage of NOL measurements < 10 during surgery was predictive for pain at the PACU [34]. We did not find the same association for pain scores in the recovery room. However, the percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 during surgery did correlate with the ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β and TNF on POD3. Moreover, patients undergoing mastectomy had a significantly higher percentage of NOL measurements above this nociception threshold. While numbers are very small, patients who suffered a postoperative wound infection (n = 3) had a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8. The current manufacturer guidelines direct that a NOL index of 0–25 represents an appropriately suppressed physiological response to noxious stimuli and adequate analgesia [59]. While the manufacturer’s instructions suggest a prolonged NOL < 10 may indicate excessive analgesia, these results and results of Morrison et al. support that striving for a lower threshold for absence of nociception could improve clinical outcomes. The connection between early postoperative pain and infectious complications is well established in breast cancer- and other types of surgery [60,61,62]. The optimal depth of anaesthesia as quantified by the bispectral index (BIS) had been long debated before the Balanced Anaesthesia. A previous study revealed no differences in one year mortality or severe adverse events between light and deep anaesthesia (BIS 50 versus 35, respectively) [63]. Relevant differences may however be present for the analgesia pillar of the triad of anaesthesia. These data support that a lower intraoperative NOL index is associated with less postoperative immune suppression and could lead to a lower risk of postoperative infections. A randomized trial investigating whether enhanced suppression of nociception with multimodal analgesia can reduce postoperative immune suppression is warranted.

There are certain limitations of this study that readers need to consider when interpreting the results. First, this study does not discriminate between the effect of surgical tissue injury and the duration of surgery. An extensive meta-analysis revealed that the likelihood of complications increased significantly with prolonged operative duration [64]. However, as no differences in the use of anaesthetics were found between the groups, we consider the larger extent of surgical tissue injury the most important consequence influence immune function due to longer duration of surgery. Second, this study did not take into account the effect of radiation, which can also influence postoperative survival.

In conclusion, our study has identified potential differences between BCS and mastectomy in the release of DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation. These differences may influence postoperative immune homeostasis. While these findings could provide a partial explanation for the improved survival outcomes associated with BCS as observed in previous large population-based retrospective trials, it is imperative to recognize the limitations inherent in such retrospective analyses, including possible selection bias and the confounding role of adjuvant therapies. Therefore, our results should be interpreted as preliminary evidence that contributes to a growing body of research. These results endorse further exploration of (1) S100 alarmins as potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer surgery and (2) suppression of intraoperative sympathetic activation to substantiate the observed association with postoperative immune dysregulation.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Alkabban FM, Ferguson T. Cancer, breast. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing 2020.

  2. van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, Jobsen JJ, van Dalen T, Linn SC, Poortmans P, Strobbe LJA, Siesling S. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Christiansen P, Carstensen SL, Ejlertsen B, Kroman N, Offersen B, Bodilsen A, Jensen MB. Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Acta Oncol. 2018;57(1):19–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gentilini OD, Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P. Less is more. Breast conservation might be even better than mastectomy in early breast cancer patients. Breast. 2017;35:32–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen QX, Wang XX, Lin PY, Zhang J, Li JJ, Song CG, Shao ZM. The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study from the SEER 18 database. Oncotarget. 2017;8(3):4773–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurian AW, Lichtensztajn DY, Keegan TH, Nelson DO, Clarke CA, Gomez SL. Use of and mortality after bilateral mastectomy compared with other surgical treatments for breast cancer in California, 1998–2011. JAMA. 2014;312(9):902–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagendijk M, van Maaren MC, Saadatmand S, Strobbe LJA, Poortmans PMP, Koppert LB, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA, Siesling S. Breast conserving therapy and mastectomy revisited: breast cancer-specific survival and the influence of prognostic factors in 129,692 patients. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(1):165–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peart O. Breast intervention and breast cancer treatment options. Radiol Technol. 2015;86(5):535 M–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ten Wolde B, Kuiper M, de Wilt JHW, Strobbe LJA. Postoperative complications after breast Cancer surgery are not related to age. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(7):1861–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Boniface J, Szulkin R, Johansson ALV. Medical and surgical postoperative complications after breast conservation versus mastectomy in older women with breast cancer: Swedish population-based register study of 34 139 women. Br J Surg. 2023;110(3):344–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science. 2002;296(5566):301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oppenheim JJ, Yang D. Alarmins: chemotactic activators of immune responses. Curr Opin Immunol. 2005;17(4):359–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsiger S, Simmen HP, Werner CM, Wanner GA, Rittirsch D. Danger signals activating the immune response after trauma. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:315941.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Benarroch EE. Autonomic-mediated immunomodulation and potential clinical relevance. Neurology. 2009;73(3):236–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Verri WA Jr., Chiu IM. Nociceptor sensory Neuron-Immune interactions in Pain and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2017;38(1):5–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijer F, Honing M, Roor T, Toet S, Calis P, Olofsen E, Martini C, van Velzen M, Aarts L, Niesters M, et al. Reduced postoperative pain using Nociception Level-guided fentanyl dosing during sevoflurane anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(6):1070–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Fragiadakis GK, Gaudillière B, Ganio EA, Aghaeepour N, Tingle M, Nolan GP, Angst MS. Patient-specific Immune States before surgery are strong correlates of Surgical Recovery. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(6):1241–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hazeldine J, Naumann DN, Toman E, Davies D, Bishop JRB, Su Z, Hampson P, Dinsdale RJ, Crombie N, Duggal NA, et al. Prehospital immune responses and development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome following traumatic injury: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002338.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Timmermans K, Kox M, Vaneker M, van den Berg M, John A, van Laarhoven A, van der Hoeven H, Scheffer GJ, Pickkers P. Plasma levels of danger-associated molecular patterns are associated with immune suppression in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(4):551–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mittempergher L, Saghatchian M, Wolf DM, Michiels S, Canisius S, Dessen P, Delaloge S, Lazar V, Benz SC, Tursz T, et al. A gene signature for late distant metastasis in breast cancer identifies a potential mechanism of late recurrences. Mol Oncol. 2013;7(5):987–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Leijte GP, Custers H, Gerretsen J, Heijne A, Roth J, Vogl T, Scheffer GJ, Pickkers P, Kox M. Increased plasma levels of Danger-Associated molecular patterns are Associated with Immune suppression and postoperative infections in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gunaldi M, Okuturlar Y, Gedikbasi A, Akarsu C, Karabulut M, Kural A. Diagnostic importance of S100A9 and S100A12 in breast cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2015;76:52–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang Y, Chen L, Shen J, Mei X, Yao J, Chen T, Zhou Y. The potential role of abnormal angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression correlated with immune infiltration after SARS-CoV-2 infection in the prognosis of breast cancer. Aging. 2021;13(17):20886–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hsieh HL, Schäfer BW, Sasaki N, Heizmann CW. Expression analysis of S100 proteins and RAGE in human tumors using tissue microarrays. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;307(2):375–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Máca J, Burša F, Ševčík P, Sklienka P, Burda M, Holub M. Alarmins and clinical outcomes after major abdominal Surgery-A prospective study. J Invest Surg. 2017;30(3):152–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Åberg AM, Bergström SH, Thysell E, Tjon-Kon-Fat LA, Nilsson JA, Widmark A, Thellenberg-Karlsson C, Bergh A, Wikström P, Lundholm M. High Monocyte Count and Expression of S100A9 and S100A12 in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Are Associated with Poor Outcome in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021, 13(10).

  27. Lu C, Liu J, Yao M, Li L, Li G. Downregulation of S100 calcium binding protein A12 inhibits the growth of glioma cells. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):261.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Sun Z, Tian W, Piao C, Xie X, Zang J, Peng S, Yu X, Wang Y. S100A12 is a promising biomarker in papillary thyroid cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1724.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khorramdelazad H, Bagheri V, Hassanshahi G, Karami H, Moogooei M, Zeinali M, Abedinzadeh M. S100A12 and RAGE expression in human bladder transitional cell carcinoma: a role for the ligand/RAGE axis in tumor progression? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(7):2725–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Acharyya S, Oskarsson T, Vanharanta S, Malladi S, Kim J, Morris PG, Manova-Todorova K, Leversha M, Hogg N, Seshan VE, et al. A CXCL1 paracrine network links cancer chemoresistance and metastasis. Cell. 2012;150(1):165–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kox M, Vrouwenvelder MQ, Pompe JC, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P, Hoedemaekers CW. The effects of brain injury on heart rate variability and the innate immune response in critically ill patients. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(5):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ben-Israel N, Kliger M, Zuckerman G, Katz Y, Edry R. Monitoring the nociception level: a multi-parameter approach. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27(6):659–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Meijer FS, Martini CH, Broens S, Boon M, Niesters M, Aarts L, Olofsen E, van Velzen M, Dahan A. Nociception-guided versus Standard Care during Remifentanil-Propofol Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(5):745–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morisson L, Nadeau-Vallée M, Espitalier F, Laferrière-Langlois P, Idrissi M, Lahrichi N, Gélinas C, Verdonck O, Richebé P. Prediction of acute postoperative pain based on intraoperative nociception level (NOL) index values: the impact of machine learning-based analysis. J Clin Monit Comput. 2023;37(1):337–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goradia S, Sardaneh AA, Narayan SW, Penm J, Patanwala AE. Vasopressor dose equivalence: a scoping review and suggested formula. J Crit Care. 2021;61:233–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nowak P, Nystrom J, Troseid M. High levels of HMGB1 in plasma may be due to ex vivo cell necrosis. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(9):4067–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Madách K, Molvarec A, Rigó J Jr., Nagy B, Pénzes I, Karádi I, Prohászka Z. Elevated serum 70 kDa heat shock protein level reflects tissue damage and disease severity in the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;139(2):133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. UNC Health Care Guideline. Opiate equianalgesic dosing chart. [https://www.med.unc.edu/aging/wp-content/uploads/sites/753/2018/06/Analgesic-Equivalent-Chart.pdf]].

  39. Wang S, Song R, Wang Z, Jing Z, Wang S, Ma J. S100A8/A9 in inflammation. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Meijer B, Gearry RB, Day AS. The role of S100A12 as a systemic marker of inflammation. Int J Inflam. 2012;2012:907078.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Austermann J, Zenker S, Roth J. S100-alarmins: potential therapeutic targets for arthritis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21(7):739–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Manganelli V, Signore M, Pacini I, Misasi R, Tellan G, Garofalo T, Lococo E, Chirletti P, Sorice M, Delogu G. Increased HMGB1 expression and release by mononuclear cells following surgical/anesthesia trauma. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Doukas P, Hellfritsch G, Krabbe H, Frankort J, Jacobs MJ, Gombert A, Simon F. Onset of adverse abdominal events due to Intestinal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury after aortic cross-clamping is Associated with elevated HSP70 serum levels in the early postoperative phase. Int J Mol Sci 2022, 23(23).

  44. Albers KI, Polat F, Helder L, Panhuizen IF, Snoeck MMJ, Polle SBW, de Vries H, Dias EM, Slooter GD, de Boer HD, et al. Quality of Recovery and Innate Immune Homeostasis in patients undergoing low-pressure Versus Standard-pressure Pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery (RECOVER): a Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2022;276(6):e664–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weber R, Groth C, Lasser S, Arkhypov I, Petrova V, Altevogt P, Utikal J, Umansky V. IL-6 as a major regulator of MDSC activity and possible target for cancer immunotherapy. Cell Immunol. 2021;359:104254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Noman AS, Uddin M, Chowdhury AA, Nayeem MJ, Raihan Z, Rashid MI, Azad AK, Rahman ML, Barua D, Sultana A, et al. Serum sonic hedgehog (SHH) and interleukin-(IL-6) as dual prognostic biomarkers in progressive metastatic breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gunnarsdottir FB, Bendahl PO, Johansson A, Benfeitas R, Rydén L, Bergenfelz C, Larsson AM. Serum immuno-oncology markers carry independent prognostic information in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer, from a prospective observational study. Breast Cancer Res. 2023;25(1):29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Eckerling A, Ricon-Becker I, Sorski L, Sandbank E, Ben-Eliyahu S. Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(12):767–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou C, Wang Z, Jiang B, Di J, Su X. Monitoring pre- and post-operative Immune alterations in patients with Locoregional Colorectal Cancer who underwent Laparoscopy by single-cell Mass Cytometry. Front Immunol. 2022;13:807539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Frazier WJ, Hall MW. Immunoparalysis and adverse outcomes from critical illness. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55(3):647–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hall MW, Knatz NL, Vetterly C, Tomarello S, Wewers MD, Volk HD, Carcillo JA. Immunoparalysis and nosocomial infection in children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(3):525–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Homburger JA, Meiler SE. Anesthesia drugs, immunity, and long-term outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006;19(4):423–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cruz FF, Rocco PR, Pelosi P. Anti-inflammatory properties of anesthetic agents. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Toft P, Tønnesen E. The systemic inflammatory response to anaesthesia and surgery. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2008;19(5–6):349–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li Y, Yi JS, Russo MA, Rosa-Bray M, Weinhold KJ, Guptill JT. Normative dataset for plasma cytokines in healthy human adults. Data Brief. 2021;35:106857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Lopez-Castejon G, Brough D. Understanding the mechanism of IL-1β secretion. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22(4):189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tulotta C, Lefley DV, Moore CK, Amariutei AE, Spicer-Hadlington AR, Quayle LA, Hughes RO, Ahmed K, Cookson V, Evans CA, et al. IL-1B drives opposing responses in primary tumours and bone metastases; harnessing combination therapies to improve outcome in breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7(1):95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gotlieb N, Rosenne E, Matzner P, Shaashua L, Sorski L, Ben-Eliyahu S. The misleading nature of in vitro and ex vivo findings in studying the impact of stress hormones on NK cell cytotoxicity. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;45:277–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Introducing the NOL® (Nociception Level). Index Algorithm - A Technical Overview. [https://medasense.com/wp-content/uploads/The-NOL-Index-Algorithm-White-Paper.pdf ].

  60. van Boekel RLM, Warlé MC, Nielen RGC, Vissers KCP, van der Sande R, Bronkhorst EM, Lerou JGC, Steegers MAH. Relationship between Postoperative Pain and overall 30-Day complications in a broad Surgical Population: an observational study. Ann Surg. 2019;269(5):856–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Albers KI, van Helden EV, Dahan A, Martini CH, Bruintjes MHD, Scheffer GJ, Steegers MAH, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Early postoperative pain after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy predicts 30-day postoperative infectious complications: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain. 2020;161(7):1565–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. van den Heuvel SAS, van der Wal SEI, Bronkhorst EM, Warlé MC, Ronday M, Plat J, van Alfen N, Joosten LAB, Lerou JGC, Vissers KCP, et al. Acute Cytokine response during breast Cancer surgery: potential role of Dexamethasone and Lidocaine and Relationship with Postoperative Pain and complications - analysis of three pooled pilot randomized controlled trials. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1243–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Short TG, Campbell D, Frampton C, Chan MTV, Myles PS, Corcoran TB, Sessler DI, Mills GH, Cata JP, Painter T, et al. Anaesthetic depth and complications after major surgery: an international, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10212):1907–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B, Sadeghirad B, Ferko NC, Cameron CG, Hinoul P. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2018;229:134–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands

    Lotte MC Jacobs, Josephine Kranendonk & Michiel C Warlé

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Leonie S Helder, Kim I Albers & Christiaan Keijzer

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Leo AB Joosten

  4. Department of Medical Genetics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj- Napoca, Romania

    Leo AB Joosten

  5. Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Luc JA Strobbe

Authors
  1. Lotte MC Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonie S Helder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kim I Albers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josephine Kranendonk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christiaan Keijzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Leo AB Joosten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Luc JA Strobbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michiel C Warlé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KA, LS, and MW contributed to the study design. KA, LJ, JK, and LS contributed to inclusions and data collection. LJ and LH analysed the blood samples. LJ, KA and MW contributed to the data analysis. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data. LJ, KA, and MW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michiel C Warlé.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee “CMO region Arnhem-Nijmegen” (NL65918.091.18) and all study procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all research participants.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Collaborators

Martin Hagenaars (Department of Anaesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jacobs, L.M., Helder, L.S., Albers, K.I. et al. The role of surgical tissue injury and intraoperative sympathetic activation in postoperative immunosuppression after breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a prospective observational study. Breast Cancer Res 26, 42 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01801-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01801-0

Keywords

Breast Cancer Research

ISSN: 1465-542X

Contact us