Skip to main content
Download PDF

SRC kinase-mediated signaling pathways and targeted therapies in breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research volume 24, Article number: 99 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) has been ranked the most common malignant tumor throughout the world and is also a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women. SRC family kinases (SFKs) belong to the non-receptor tyrosine kinase (nRTK) family, which has eleven members sharing similar structure and function. Among them, SRC is the first identified proto-oncogene in mammalian cells. Oncogenic overexpression or activation of SRC has been revealed to play essential roles in multiple events of BC progression, including tumor initiation, growth, metastasis, drug resistance and stemness regulations. In this review, we will first give an overview of SRC kinase and SRC-relevant functions in various subtypes of BC and then systematically summarize SRC-mediated signaling transductions, with particular emphasis on SRC-mediated substrate phosphorylation in BC. Furthermore, we will discuss the progress of SRC-based targeted therapies in BC and the potential future direction.

Introduction

According to the global cancer statistics in 2020, female BC has surpassed lung cancer and been ranked as the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the world, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases and accounting for 11.7% of the total cases [1]. Early diagnosis and the continued improvement in treatment regiments, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and biotherapy, have significantly improved the cure rates of patients with localized and some of the metastatic BCs [2]. However, BC is still the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide, with 1/4 cancer cases and 1/6 cancer deaths [1]. Based on the expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), BC is mainly divided into four different subtypes and treated accordingly [3, 4]. Luminal A (ER+/PR+/HER2−) and B (ER+/PR−/lowHER2−/+) are the most frequent subtypes and represent around 60–70% of all BCs. These BC subtypes are sensitive to endocrine-based therapy through inhibiting estradiol (E2)/ER-mediated signaling, and clinical studies have shown that endocrine therapies can considerably reduce luminal BC recurrence and mortality [5]. However, up to 20% of the patients diagnosed with operable ER + tumors recur with metastatic disease, while endocrine resistance inevitably occurs in ER + metastatic or advanced BC [6, 7]. HER2+ BC is characterized with HER2 gene amplification or protein overexpression, which accounts for around 20% of all BCs [4]. Humanized monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including trastuzumab, pertuzumab, pyrotinib and lapatinib, are clinically approved drugs to treat HER2+ BC [8, 9]. The introduction of these HER2-targeted drugs to the treatment of patients with HER2+ BC has led to dramatic improvements in survival in both early and advanced settings. However, nearly all patients with metastatic HER2+ BC eventually progress on anti-HER2 therapy due to de novo or acquired resistance [4]. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC: ER−/PR−/HER2−), a subgroup lacking the expression of hormone receptor (HR) and HER2, has no effective targeted therapy available like above-mentioned BC subtypes. Although TNBC patients are usually sensitive to chemotherapy, they are more prone to relapse and metastasize early and thus have a worse prognosis than other BC subtypes [3]. In addition, targeting immune checkpoints has shown therapeutic effect on improving the overall survival of TNBC patients with PD-L1 positive tumors [10]. However, these effects are only observed in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. Therefore, identifying new therapeutic targets for treating TNBC is still an urgent demand.

nRTKs represent a large set of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase family, which consist of ten members, including ABL, ACK, CSK, FAK, FES, FRK, JAK, SRC, SYK and TEC [11]. These kinases can be bound and activated by various RTKs, thereby regulating cancer development-related cellular events, such as cell polarity, proliferation, differentiation, migration, invasion and angiogenesis [11]. Among the nRTK family, SFKs are the most representative in mammals and are composed of eleven members, including BLK, BRK, FGR, FYN, FRK, HCK, LCK, LYN, SRC, SRM and YES [12]. Among these members, SRC is the first ever described tyrosine kinase proto-oncogene and also the most frequently implicated in tumorigenesis and metastasis of various cancer types, especially for BC [13]. Therefore, targeting SRC kinase represents an attractive strategy for BC therapy.

SRC kinase-relevant functions in BC

The SRC protein is a 60-kDa protein tyrosine kinase [13]. Structurally, it mainly consists of seven parts from the N- to C-terminal: SRC homology 4 (SH4) domain, unique domain, SH3 domain, SH2 domain, SH2-kinase linker domain, SH1 domain and the C-­terminal negative regulatory region (Fig. 1). Among these domains, SH4 is responsible for SRC membrane localization; SH3 domain can bind to the proline-­rich peptides, thereby mediating the protein–protein interactions; the unique domain ling SH4 and SH3 domain usually varies among all SFK members; SH1 domain and the C-­terminal negative regulatory region contain tyrosine 419 and 530, respectively [14]. The phosphorylation of SRC Y530 residue by CSK or CHK will facilitate the interactions between SH2 domain and the C-­terminal regulatory region of SRC to form a pocket, thereby putting the kinase domain in this pocket and keeping SRC kinase in a closed configuration [15], while dephosphorylation of Y530 residue will display the substrate-binding pocket, allowing for the autophosphorylation at Y419 and the subsequent substrate accessing to the catalytic site (Fig. 2). SRC has been identified to be frequently overexpressed and/or aberrantly activated in various subtypes of BC, and high level of SRC activity is positively correlated with malignant potential and inversely correlated with the patient survival [13]. In this section, we will systematically summarize the functions of SRC that have been reported so far in different subtypes of BC.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic overview of the basic structure of SRC protein. SRC protein is mainly composed of seven parts (from N- to C-terminus): SH4 domain, unique domain, SH3 domain, SH2 domain, SH2-kinase linker domain, SH1 domain and the C-­terminal negative regulatory region

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

SRC kinase configuration with Tyr530 phosphorylation or Tyr419 phosphorylation, respectively. SRC activity is inhibited when the phosphorylated Y530 at the C­-terminal region binds to the SH2 domain, which will prevent the interaction of substrate proteins with the kinase domain (left panel). Dephosphorylated Y530 will induce the disassociation of the C-­terminal region from the SH2 domain, which allows substrate protein access to the catalytic kinase site in the SH1 domain, and be subsequently phosphorylated by SRC kinase (right panel)

Full size image

Luminal BC

The luminal subtype of BC (ER+/PR±HER2−/+) is characterized by the expressions of HR [7]. SRC has been shown to be essential for E2/ERα and progestin/PR-mediated signaling transductions, cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation [16]. Typically, in response to the stimulation of either E2 or progestin, ER or PR could directly interact with SRC kinase, leading to its relief from an intermolecular inhibitory conformation to an autoactivated form [17, 18]. Activated SRC could further initiate the Ras/Raf/MAPK cascade and induce BC cell proliferation [17, 18]. Reciprocally, the activated MAPKs could phosphorylate ER/PR and their binding factors, including STATs, to guide their downstream gene expression [19]. In addition, SRC-mediated ERα phosphorylation was revealed to be involved in the ERα interaction with its binding promoters, which was critical for ERα-dependent gene transcriptions and BC progression [16, 20].

Endocrine therapy is a crucial component of treatment for the luminal subtype of BC, which is usually performed either by inhibiting the production of estrogen or impeding the binding of estrogen to its receptors [21]. Some representative drugs, such as anastrozole and letrozole, are used to block the aromatase activity, thereby interfering with the androgen-converting into estrogen [7], while tamoxifen and raloxifene could compete with estrogen in binding ER to inhibit E2-mediated signaling transduction [7]. Although many patients have benefitted from endocrine therapy with a clear reduction in mortality and cancer recurrence, de novo and acquired resistance to this treatment remain a major challenge [7]. SRC activation has been considered as a survival signal for tamoxifen-resistant BC cells. Mechanistically, SRC-mediated MAPK signaling could induce ER phosphorylation and promote ER activation, as well as ER-regulated transcriptions in a ligand-independent manner [7, 22]. Meanwhile, multiple preclinical studies have reported that dual inhibition of SRC kinase and ER-mediated signaling can prevent acquired antihormone resistance in BC cells [23, 24]. In addition, ERα has been shown to directly interact with PI3K and SRC in a subset of invasive BC, and this complex thus represents a novel tumor biomarker to predict survival and/or response to targeted agents [25]. More interestingly, E2 can induce stress and apoptosis in long-term E2-deprived cells, while SRC activation has been revealed to play an essential role in mediating stress responses induced by E2 [26]. This study thus provided a mechanistic rationale for a new approach in the treatment of endocrine-resistant BC.

HER2 + BC

Overexpression and/or amplification of HER2/ERBB2/NEU have been shown to be a causal factor for breast tumor malignancy and poor prognosis of patients [4]. Muller’s laboratory initially reported that elevated Src kinase activity was observed in Neu-induced mammary tumors [27]. Furthermore, disruption of Src kinase in this mammary tumor model could reduce the mammary tumor development [28]. These studies thus suggested that Src kinase was required for the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice. Subsequently, Tan et al. found that ErbB2-activated BC cells had higher metastatic potentials and increased Src activities compared with ErbB2 low-expressing cells [29]. Inhibition of Src activity significantly attenuated ErbB2-mediated cancer cell invasion in vitro and metastasis in an experimental animal model [29]. This study highlighted that increased SRC activities were required for ErbB2-mediated BC metastasis. A recent study further revealed that SRC activation could stimulate mitochondrial ATP production and suppress energy stress, which sustained the activation of mTORC1 and increased the translation of Ezh2 and Suz12, thereby driving ErbB2-related tumorigenesis and metastasis [30]. In addition, the clinical study also demonstrated that high levels of SRC activity in ductal carcinoma in situ were highly correlated with the clinicopathological factors, including HER2 status and the early recurrence [31]. Taken together, all these findings indicated the essential roles of SRC in the development, metastasis and prognosis of HER2+ BC.

Although trastuzumab has been demonstrated to effectively reduce the risk of recurrence and death in HER2+ BC patients, the majority of these patients possess de novo resistance or acquired resistance to trastuzumab during treatment [8, 9]. Zhang et al. have found that the BC patients with high SRC kinase activity are usually correlated with lower clinical response to trastuzumab-based therapy, higher progressive disease and shorter overall survival rates than patients having low SRC activity [32, 33]. Moreover, they also proved that SRC was a key modulator of trastuzumab response and a common node downstream of multiple trastuzumab resistance pathways, such as the activation of other RTKs and PTEN loss [33]. Combinational inhibition of SRC and HER2 activities reversed trastuzumab-resistant in vitro and eliminated tumors in vivo [34]. Therefore, inhibition of SRC-mediated signaling combining HER2-targeted therapy could be a very promising therapeutic strategy for patients with HER2+ BC.

TNBC

Owing to lacking the expressions of ER, PR and HER2 in TNBC, targeted therapies are very limited for this subtype of BC. In addition, TNBC patients have a high incidence of early relapse and metastasis, with preferentially metastasizing to the bone, lung and brain [35]. Using a TNBC cell-based animal model, Myoui et al. have shown that Src kinase activity is positively correlated with the capacity of TNBC cells to develop bone and lung metastases [36]. Dasatinib is an orally active small molecule inhibitor targeting both SRC and other SFKs. Finn et al. have found that Dasatinib preferentially inhibits the growth of TNBC cell lines [37], and combining Dasatinib with several cytotoxic agents produces therapeutic synergy in preclinical TNBC models [38]. However, single-agent Dasatinib has very limited activity in unselected patients with TNBC [39].

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs), a subpopulation of cancer cells that possess the ability to self-renewal and differentiation, have been proposed to contribute to the heterogeneity, relapse and therapy resistance of BC. BCSCs have been reported to be mainly enriched in TNBC cells, and targeting these cells thus becomes a priority for the development of novel therapy in TNBC patients [40]. Indeed, preclinical studies have demonstrated that a combination of Dasatinib and paclitaxel synergistically reduces TNBC cell viability in vitro and tumor growth in vivo [41, 42]. Utilizing chemotherapy-resistant TNBC patient-derived xenografts, Kohale et al. recently showed that treatment with Dasatinib led to the inhibition of tumor growth in vivo [43]. Therefore, these studies highlighted that targeting SRC-mediated BC stemness might represent an effective therapeutic regimen for TNBC.

SRC kinase-mediated signaling transductions in BC

As a tyrosine kinase, SRC carries out its cancer-promoting functions mainly through catalyzing the tyrosine phosphorylation of various protein substrates. Therefore, identifying the key substrate of SRC in these processes will shed light on how these complexes contribute to the regulation of cellular events in BC. To this end, we aim to systematically summarize the SRC-mediated signaling transductions, with emphasis on its phosphorylation substrates in various contexts. We here have divided these substrates into three major groups according to their cellular localization to discuss their detailed biological functions in BC.

Membrane targets in BC

RTKs represent a large family of enzyme-linked receptors, which can be activated by ligand-mediated dimerization of kinases. The activated RTKs in turn phosphorylate specific tyrosine residues on the intracellular signaling proteins, to initiate a signal transduction cascade and gene expression. SRC is able to bidirectionally interact with multiple RTKs via its SH2 domain, thereby regulating cell proliferation and survival. Typically, these identified SRC-interacting RTKs include EGFR, vEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR and others [44] (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Among these SRC-associated RTKs, EGFR overexpression has been observed in a variety of cancer types, including BC. Specifically, SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR regulated its receptor function, as well as its oncogenic role in tumor progression [45]. Besides, in HER2+ BC, SRC-mediated ErbB2 phosphorylation could promote its oncogenic signaling by positively regulating ErbB2/ErbB3 heterocomplex formation [46]. In addition, TGFβRII is a serine/threonine kinase transmembrane receptor, its overexpression in mouse model enhances the mammary tumorigenesis [47]. Galliher et al. have shown that SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of TGFβRII facilitates the activation of TGFβ-p38 MAPK signaling, thereby promoting BC cell proliferation and invasion [48] (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Taken together, all these studies highlighted that targeting SRC kinase and these RTK activities might be efficient for treating SRC/RTKs-associated BC.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SRC kinase-mediated phosphorylation and function of membrane proteins in BC. SRC can interact with multiple membrane proteins through tyrosine phosphorylation, including HER family members, TGFβ receptor, AJ components and other transmembrane proteins, to coordinate the signaling transductions and cell proliferation, survival, migration, invasion and metastasis in BC

Full size image

Adherens junctions (AJs) are described as the cell–cell connections between neighboring cells through direct interaction, which are mainly mediated by the cadherin–catenin protein complex. In mammals, AJs are essential for epithelial cell integrity, tissue formation and tumor suppression [49]. BC is mainly originated from the epithelial cells lining the ducts of the breast, and dysregulations of these AJs have been involved in the BC tumorigenesis and metastasis. SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/β-catenin complex in normal epithelial cells led to the loss of epithelial differentiation and induced the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [50,51,52]. Besides, E-cadherin phosphorylation induced by SRC was also required for EGF-induced E-cadherin downregulation and AJ disassembly, as well as the acquisition of an invasive phenotype in breast tumors [53, 54] (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Trask is a 140-kDa type I transmembrane glycoprotein, which is also able to interact with Cadherin [55]. Trask is widely expressed in human normal epithelial tissues; however, its phosphorylation at tyrosine residues is observed in many epithelial tumors [56]. Further investigations revealed that SRC-mediated Trask phosphorylation was highly relevant to the mitotic regulation of cell adhesion and the epithelial tumorigenesis [56, 57]. CDCP1, another transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in BC, is a predictor of poor prognosis of patients [56]. Its phosphorylation by SRC was induced upon loss of cell adhesion and was thought to be linked to the metastatic potential of tumor cells [58, 59] (Fig. 3 and Table 1). These studies thus highlighted the central roles of SRC-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation in mediating AJ-associated tumor suppression, EMT and tumor metastasis in BC.

Cytoplasmic targets in BC

Focal adhesion (FA) is defined as the cell attachment to the extracellular matrix (ECM) by integrins or intercellular transmembrane receptors, which connects the extracellular signals and the actin cytoskeleton. FA regulates a large number of integrin-mediated cell signaling events, including cell survival, proliferation, contraction, migration and differentiation. The composition of FA is quite dynamic and involved in various signaling, catalytic, cytoskeletal, adaptor and scaffold proteins. SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of integrin subunits can reduce the integrin binding strength to ECM, thereby promoting cell motility [60, 61]. For example, FAK is an nRTK, and it is also a major protein of the FA complex to mediate the integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration [62, 63]. In BC, FAK activation has been shown to be required for ErbB2-mediated oncogenic transformation, invasion and tumor progression in vivo [64, 65], while SRC-mediated FAK tyrosine phosphorylation at multiple residues has been demonstrated to play an important role in full FAK activation [62, 63]. In addition, activated SRC/FAK module can further activate multiple other FA components to initiate a cascade of signal transduction events that regulate BC tumorigenesis and metastasis [66,67,68]. These FA components that have been reported in BC include Paxillin [69, 70], Tensin-3 [71], TKS5 [72], CAV-1 [73, 74], LPP [75], p130Cas [76] and p190RhoGAP [77,78,79] (Fig. 4 and Table 1). In addition, SRC kinase can also regulate the PI3K/AKT signaling through either inhibitory phosphorylation of PTEN [80] or activating phosphorylation of PI3K [81], AKT [33, 82, 83] or SGK1 [84], thereby regulating multiple events of BC development (Fig. 4 and Table 1). Altogether, these studies highlighted the essential roles of SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation in FA regulation and PI3K-AKT signaling transductions, both of which were essential for SRC-induced mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SRC kinase-mediated phosphorylation and function of cytoplasmic proteins in BC. SRC can phosphorylate multiple cytoplasmic proteins at tyrosine residues, including FA components, PI3K/AKT signaling components, as well as many protein kinases and proteases, thereby regulating mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis in various BC subtypes

Full size image

Besides FA and PI3K/AKT signaling components, many other cytoplasmic kinases or proteases were also identified to be directly phosphorylated by SRC kinase, thereby involving in the mammary tumorigenesis and progression (Fig. 4 and Table 1). For example, SRC-mediated LATS1 phosphorylation abolished the tumor suppressor activity of LATS1 and induced tumorigenesis in a YAP-dependent manner in BC cells [85, 86]. Similarly, SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of CDH1 could inhibit the ubiquitin E3 ligase activity of anaphase-promoting complex, thereby driving cell cycle progression and inducing mammary tumorigenesis [87, 88]. ADAM15B-mediated FGFR2 shedding has been implicated in the development of BC [89]. Maretzky et al. found that SRC-mediated ADAM15 phosphorylation was required for ADAM15 protease activity and the subsequent FGFR2 shedding [90]. In addition, SRC-related metabolic regulation was also found to be correlated with the invasive and metastatic potentials of BC cells. For example, LDHA is an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate and NADH to lactate and NAD+, and it is also a key step in glycolysis. Jin et al. have found that SRC kinase-mediated LDHA phosphorylation promotes BC cell invasion, anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis [91]. Phosphatidic acid phosphatase Lipin-1 is a lipid metabolism-related enzyme, which generates diglyceride precursors and is necessary for the synthesis of glycerolipids [92]. SRC-mediated Lipin-1 phosphorylation on multiple tyrosine residues could enhance its phosphatase activity, thereby promoting BC cell proliferation and malignancy [93]. These studies linked the SRC-mediated signaling with the metabolic alterations, which also represented an attractive point of therapeutic intervention for BC treatment.

Nuclear targets in BC

Multiple transcription factors or transcriptional regulatory proteins have been found to be directly activated by SRC in BC, including STATs, YAP1, NF-kB, etc. (Fig. 5 and Table 1). The STATs, such as 1, 3, 5a, 5b, were initially found to be activated by the intracellular JAK family kinases to mediate the cytokine-associated signaling transductions. Subsequent studies demonstrated that STATs could also be activated by a wide array of ligands and growth factors, including EGF, PDGF and some G-protein coupled receptor agonists [94]. Using both mouse fibroblast and human BC cell models, Garcia et al. and Kloth et al. have shown that the activation of STAT3/5 is responsible for BC tumorigenesis induced by the overexpression of SRC and EGFR. Specifically, SRC-mediated STAT3/5 phosphorylation enhanced their nuclear localization and binding to STAT-specific response elements, thereby inducing cell proliferation and survival [95, 96]. In addition, a recent study also revealed that SRC-mediated STAT3 signaling was required for the expression of pluripotency factors and BCSC enrichment in response to chemotherapy [97]. NCAPG expression is highly upregulated in trastuzumab-resistant HER2+ BC. SRC-mediated STAT3 nuclear localization and activation have been demonstrated to be responsible for NCAPG overexpression-induced trastuzumab resistance [98]. YAP1 and β-catenin are the downstream effectors of Hippo and Wnt signaling pathways, respectively, both of which participate in the occurrence and development of breast tumors. In RASSF1A-methylated BC tumors, Vlahov et al. have found that SRC-induced YAP1/β-catenin association through tyrosine phosphorylation is responsible for the Myc overexpression and invasive phenotypes of BC cells [52], while in BC-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), Calvo et al. have reported that the activation of YAP1 by SRC kinase is a signature feature of CAFs, which can further promote matrix stiffening, BC cell invasion and angiogenesis [99]. In addition, the activation of SRC by glucocorticoids-induced FA can increase YAP1 protein level, nuclear accumulation and transcriptional activity, thereby enhancing the CSC self-renewal and chemoresistance in basal-like BC subtype [100]. The latest study also showed that SRC-mediated β-catenin phosphorylation was responsible for EGF-induced aggressiveness and metastasis of TNBC cells [101]. Other transcription factors phosphorylated by SRC kinase, including NF-κB p65 and ETS1, are also essential for BC-associated phenotypes. Specifically, SRC kinase-mediated NF-κB activation is required for CTGF-induced Glut3 expression and the aggressive phenotypes of TNBC [102], while SRC-mediated ETS1 phosphorylation can stabilize ETS1 and promote anchorage-independent growth in vitro and tumor growth in vivo [103]. Taken together, all these findings highlighted that SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation on the transcription factors represented an important regulatory mechanism for BC tumorigenesis and development. Therefore, targeting the transcriptional outputs of these transcriptional factors in a specific context might be more straightforward for BC treatment.

Fig. 5
figure 5

SRC kinase-mediated phosphorylation and function of nuclear proteins in BC. SRC can directly phosphorylate multiple nuclear proteins, including transcription factors, cell cycle regulators and RNA-binding proteins, thereby coordinating gene expression, cell cycle and BC-related cell behaviors

Full size image

Apart from the above-mentioned transcription factors, some nuclear receptors and nuclear-localized proteins, such as ER, AR, Sam68 and p27, were also found to be directly phosphorylated by SRC kinase (Fig. 5 and Table 1). Among these substrates, SRC-mediated ER phosphorylation is necessary for ER binding to the estrogen response element and its subsequent dimerization [104, 105]. While SRC-mediated AR phosphorylation is required for Kindlin-2-induced BC cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo [106]. Based on these studies, the combination of endocrine therapy with SRC inhibitors may represent a treatment regimen in these subtypes of BC. In addition, the activities of cell cycle-associated protein and RNA-binding protein were also found to rely on SRC-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation. Typically, SRC-mediated p27 phosphorylation impairs the Cdk2 inhibitory action of p27 and thereby promotes the tamoxifen-resistance in BC cells, as well as the tumor progression in a mouse BC model [107, 108]. Sam68 is an RNA-binding protein, and SRC-mediated Sam68 phosphorylation has also proved to be necessary for mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis [109].

Table 1 SRC kinase-mediated signaling transductions in BC
Full size table

SRC kinase-based target therapies in BC

Considering the dominant and broad roles of SRC kinase in mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis, SRC kinase inhibitors therefore hold great promise for the BC therapy. Multiple SRC kinase inhibitors have been previously developed by drug companies and approved by FDA for the treatment of hematologic tumors, including Bosutinib, Dasatinib and Saracatinib [12, 110]. Currently, these drugs are also widely used in the clinical trials for BC treatment. In this section, we mainly aim to summarize the clinical evidence and effects of SRC inhibitors as treatment in BC (Table 2).

Bosutinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor and has activity against all SFKs, as well as ABL. Multiple preclinical studies have demonstrated that Bosutinib can suppress BC cell growth, invasion and metastasis in vitro and in vivo [111, 112]. In addition, oral administration of Bosutinib in the MMTV-PyVmT transgenic mouse model could inhibit both the tumor initiation and tumor growth in older animals with preexisting tumors [113]. In a phase II clinical trial with metastatic BC patients, Bosutinib monotherapy showed a tolerable safety profile and moderated antitumor activity in a subset of patients with HR-positive BC [114]. However, the subsequent clinical trials combining Bosutinib with letrozole or exemestane in HR-positive BC patients did not receive a favorable risk–benefit profile with early termination of the studies [115, 116]. Besides, in a phase I study, Bosutinib combined with capecitabine demonstrated a safety profile; however, limited efficacy was observed in locally advanced/metastatic BC [117]. Therefore, further studies with Bosutinib in combination with other agents were warranted following the implementation of an appropriate method of patient selection. Beetham et al. recently revealed that loss of integrin-linked kinase activity can sensitize cells to Bosutinib treatment in a TNBC model [118], which may provide a new drug combination strategy for improving the clinical effectiveness of Bosutinib.

Dasatinib is an orally available small molecule targeting multiple SFKs, including SRC, LCK, FYN and YES [119]. Numerous in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies have demonstrated that Dasatinib has a high antitumor efficiency in various BC subtypes. However, clinical studies have confirmed that Dasatinib alone shows a very limited response when it is tested in TNBC and metastatic BC patients [39, 120,121,122]. To this end, a phase II study was designed to prospectively assess the utility of three previously published gene signatures to select patients with clinical benefits from Dasatinib [123]. Even so, none of these gene signatures could efficiently predict the clinical sensitivity to Dasatinib as a single agent. All these studies thus highlighted that Dasatinib has a very limited single-agent activity in unselected BC patients; further studies should consider Dasatinib combination with other agents in selected BC patients.

Multiple chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel and capecitabine, have shown great antitumor activity in both preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, the combination of these agents and Dasatinib has been subsequently investigated in clinical trials to determine their synergistic antitumor activities. Typically, Fornier et al. showed that the combination of weekly paclitaxel and Dasatinib is feasible in phase I [124]; however, the phase II study of this combination is stopped early due to slow accrual [125]. Meanwhile, another phase II study with Dasatinib plus capecitabine shows a clinical benefit in 56% of response-evaluable patients with advanced BC, which supports further study with this combination in standard treatment [126]. Except for the combination of Dasatinib with chemotherapeutic agents, antihormone and HER2-targeted drugs are also widely used for evaluating efficacy and safety in combination with Dasatinib. Typically, in a non-comparative phase II trial, Dasatinib plus letrozole has shown efficiency in ER+/HER2− metastatic BC, and this combination can delay the development of endocrine therapy resistance [127]. Additionally, SRC kinase is an essential factor for normal osteoclast function and for the development of bone metastases of BC [128]. A phase I/II study of Dasatinib in combination with zoledronic acid was designed to test their clinical efficacy in bone-predominant HER2-negative BC metastases. The result showed that this combination was well tolerated and potentially effective, owing to that a clinical benefit was observed for bone metastases in patients with HR-positive BC [129]. In HER2+ BC, phase I study has shown that the combination of Dasatinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel is feasible, and shows a synergistic effect in patients with trastuzumab resistance [130]. Moreover, the phase II trial also showed this combination is active with an objective response rate of almost 80% in HER2+ metastatic BC patients [131]. Therefore, the combination of Dasatinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel is highly recommended for the future clinical treatment of HER2+ metastatic BC patients. Taken together, all these studies indicated that combining Dasatinib with chemotherapy and other targeted drugs might be worth pursuing in molecularly determined patient subsets.

Saracatinib is an SRC-ABL kinase inhibitor. Compared to the Dasatinib, its adverse effects are moderate and easily managed. An early preclinical study has reported that Saracatinib and tamoxifen can cooperatively inhibit the growth of human ER+ BC cells [132]. In addition, combinational treatment of human BC cells using Saracatinib and tamoxifen can also effectively prevent antihormone resistance in vitro [23]. More importantly, Saracatinib markedly prevents the development of premalignant lesions and delays tumor onset in the MMTV-Neu mouse model [133]. Based on these studies, a phase II trial has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Saracatinib monotherapy in unselected metastatic BC patients. However, the results are not sufficiently promising and Saracatinib does not show significant single-agent activity for the treatment of patients [134].

Compared to the above-mentioned SRC kinase inhibitors, the recently identified SRC inhibitor eCF506 has been proved to be more selective and specific for SFKs [110]. Moreover, eCF506 can reduce the TNBC cell growth in vitro and in vivo, as behaved like Bosutinib [118]. In addition, using a mouse TNBC metastasis model, eCF506 has mediated very potent in vivo antitumor activity against both primary tumors and bone metastases [135]. Based on these preclinical findings, eCF506 thus holds great promise as a first-in-class clinical candidate for the treatment of SRC-associated BC in the future.

Conclusion and future perspectives

SRC is the first identified oncoprotein and also the first described protein tyrosine kinase. Over half a century of study has provided much information about its structure, function and SRC-mediated signaling transductions. Especially in human BC, SRC kinase is able to cooperate with multiple RTKs as well as a wide variety of downstream substrates, thereby regulating multiple events during tumor development. Despite that significant progress has been made in the elucidation of SRC-mediated signaling pathways, the translation from laboratory research to clinical application is not straightforward. The possible reasons may include: (1) SRC is rarely mutated or over-amplified like other oncogenes in BC, such as EGFR and HER2, which leads to the lack of a reliable predicative biomarker for response to SRC inhibitors. Therefore, a combination of the key downstream substrates in different contexts may be helpful for predicting the tumor development and utilizing the SRC inhibitors in clinic. For example, one recent study has revealed that Dasatinib radically reduced tumor growth in xenografts that have a signature of high pTyr characterization [43]. (2) Most of the SRC inhibitors in clinical testing are not selective and target other SFKs, which may have adverse events or side effects on both tumor cells and normal tissues. Therefore, elucidating the specific function of SRC in BC and developing more selective SRC inhibitors (like eCF506) may improve the clinical outcomes. (3) Due to the BC cell heterogeneity and its complex microenvironment, targeting SRC alone is very weak in clinic. Therefore, combinational treatment with SRC inhibitors and chemotherapeutics as well as other targeted drugs should continue to be explored in BC treatment clinical trials. Even more exciting is that the immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoint has been demonstrated to significantly improve the response to chemotherapy in PD-L1-positive metastatic TNBCs [10, 136, 137]. Therefore, finding more precise drug partners for SRC inhibitors is needed in the future.

Table 2 Clinical trials designed in breast tumors for the treatment with SRC kinase inhibitors
Full size table

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AJs:

Adherens junctions

BC:

Breast cancer

CAFs:

Cancer-associated fibroblasts

CSC:

Cancer stem-like cell

E2:

Estradiol

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

EMT:

Epithelial–mesenchymal transition

ER:

Estrogen receptor

FA:

Focal adhesion

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

HR:

Hormone receptor

MMTV:

Mouse mammary tumor virus

nRTK:

Non-receptor tyrosine kinases

PR:

Progesterone

SFKs:

SRC family kinases

SH:

SRC homology

TNBC:

Triple negative breast cancer

References

  1. Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez RH. Present and future evolution of advanced breast cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12 Suppl 2:S1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrari P, et al. Molecular mechanisms, biomarkers and emerging therapies for chemotherapy resistant TNBC. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pernas S, Tolaney SM. HER2-positive breast cancer: new therapeutic frontiers and overcoming resistance. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919833519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin NU, Winer EP. Advances in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:798–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pan H, et al. 20-year risks of breast-cancer recurrence after stopping endocrine therapy at 5 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1836–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanker AB, Sudhan DR, Arteaga CL. Overcoming endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Slamon DJ, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Romond EH, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1673–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid P, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2108–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Angelucci A. Targeting tyrosine kinases in cancer: lessons for an effective targeted therapy in the clinic. Cancers. 2019;11:490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roskoski R Jr. Src protein-tyrosine kinase structure, mechanism, and small molecule inhibitors. Pharmacol Res. 2015;94:9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elsberger B. Translational evidence on the role of Src kinase and activated Src kinase in invasive breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;89:343–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato G. Regulatory roles of the N-terminal intrinsically disordered region of modular Src. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ia KK, et al. Structural elements and allosteric mechanisms governing regulation and catalysis of CSK-family kinases and their inhibition of Src-family kinases. Growth Factors. 2010;28:329–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song RX, Zhang Z, Santen RJ. Estrogen rapid action via protein complex formation involving ERalpha and Src. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2005;16:347–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boonyaratanakornkit V, et al. Progesterone receptor contains a proline-rich motif that directly interacts with SH3 domains and activates c-Src family tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell. 2001;8:269–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ballare C, et al. Two domains of the progesterone receptor interact with the estrogen receptor and are required for progesterone activation of the c-Src/Erk pathway in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:1994–2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dwyer AR, Truong TH, Ostrander JH, Lange CA. 90 YEARS OF PROGESTERONE: steroid receptors as MAPK signaling sensors in breast cancer: let the fates decide. J Mol Endocrinol. 2020;65:T35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng W, et al. Potentiation of estrogen receptor activation function 1 (AF-1) by Src/JNK through a serine 118-independent pathway. Mol Endocrinol. 2001;15:32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aggelis V, Johnston SRD. Advances in endocrine-based therapies for Estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Drugs. 2019;79:1849–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rasha F, Sharma M, Pruitt K. Mechanisms of endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2021;532: 111322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hiscox S, et al. Dual targeting of Src and ER prevents acquired antihormone resistance in breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115:57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Y, et al. Combined Src and ER blockade impairs human breast cancer proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poulard C, et al. Activation of rapid oestrogen signalling in aggressive human breast cancers. EMBO Mol Med. 2012;4:1200–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fan P, et al. c-Src modulates estrogen-induced stress and apoptosis in estrogen-deprived breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2013;73:4510–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muthuswamy SK, Siegel PM, Dankort DL, Webster MA, Muller WJ. Mammary tumors expressing the neu proto-oncogene possess elevated c-Src tyrosine kinase activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:735–43.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guy CT, Muthuswamy SK, Cardiff RD, Soriano P, Muller WJ. Activation of the c-Src tyrosine kinase is required for the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice. Genes Dev. 1994;8:23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan M, et al. ErbB2 promotes Src synthesis and stability: novel mechanisms of Src activation that confer breast cancer metastasis. Can Res. 2005;65:1858–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Smith HW, et al. An ErbB2/c-Src axis links bioenergetics with PRC2 translation to drive epigenetic reprogramming and mammary tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilson GR, et al. Activated c-SRC in ductal carcinoma in situ correlates with high tumour grade, high proliferation and HER2 positivity. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1410–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Muthuswamy SK. Trastuzumab resistance: all roads lead to SRC. Nat Med. 2011;17:416–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang S, et al. Combating trastuzumab resistance by targeting SRC, a common node downstream of multiple resistance pathways. Nat Med. 2011;17:461–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peiro G, et al. Src, a potential target for overcoming trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:689–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:674–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Myoui A, et al. C-SRC tyrosine kinase activity is associated with tumor colonization in bone and lung in an animal model of human breast cancer metastasis. Can Res. 2003;63:5028–33.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Finn RS, et al. Dasatinib, an orally active small molecule inhibitor of both the src and abl kinases, selectively inhibits growth of basal-type/"triple-negative" breast cancer cell lines growing in vitro. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;105:319–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tryfonopoulos D, et al. Src: a potential target for the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2011;22:2234–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Finn RS, et al. Dasatinib as a single agent in triple-negative breast cancer: results of an open-label phase 2 study. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2011;17:6905–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Fiska A, Koukourakis MI. The CD44+/CD24- phenotype relates to “triple-negative” state and unfavorable prognosis in breast cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2011;28:745–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tian J, et al. Dasatinib sensitises triple negative breast cancer cells to chemotherapy by targeting breast cancer stem cells. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:1495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lou L, Yu Z, Wang Y, Wang S, Zhao Y. c-Src inhibitor selectively inhibits triple-negative breast cancer overexpressed Vimentin in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:1648–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kohale IN, et al. Identification of Src family kinases as potential therapeutic targets for chemotherapy-resistant triple negative breast cancer. Cancers. 2022;14:4220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Parsons JT, Parsons SJ. Src family protein tyrosine kinases: cooperating with growth factor and adhesion signaling pathways. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997;9:187–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Biscardi JS, et al. c-Src-mediated phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 is associated with modulation of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:8335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ishizawar RC, Miyake T, Parsons SJ. c-Src modulates ErbB2 and ErbB3 heterocomplex formation and function. Oncogene. 2007;26:3503–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bottinger EP, Jakubczak JL, Haines DC, Bagnall K, Wakefield LM. Transgenic mice overexpressing a dominant-negative mutant type II transforming growth factor beta receptor show enhanced tumorigenesis in the mammary gland and lung in response to the carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz-[a]-anthracene. Can Res. 1997;57:5564–70.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Galliher AJ, Schiemann WP. Src phosphorylates Tyr284 in TGF-beta type II receptor and regulates TGF-beta stimulation of p38 MAPK during breast cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Can Res. 2007;67:3752–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. van Roy F, Berx G. The cell-cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2008;65:3756–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Behrens J, et al. Loss of epithelial differentiation and gain of invasiveness correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/beta-catenin complex in cells transformed with a temperature-sensitive v-SRC gene. J Cell Biol. 1993;120:757–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kinch MS, Clark GJ, Der CJ, Burridge K. Tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the adhesions of ras-transformed breast epithelia. J Cell Biol. 1995;130:461–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Vlahov N, et al. Alternate RASSF1 transcripts control SRC activity, E-cadherin contacts, and YAP-mediated invasion. Curr Biol CB. 2015;25:3019–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mukherjee M, et al. Structure of a novel phosphotyrosine-binding domain in Hakai that targets E-cadherin. EMBO J. 2012;31:1308–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rolland Y, et al. The CDC42-interacting protein 4 controls epithelial cell cohesion and tumor dissemination. Dev Cell. 2014;30:553–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Bhatt AS, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Craik CS, Moasser MM. Adhesion signaling by a novel mitotic substrate of src kinases. Oncogene. 2005;24:5333–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong CH, et al. Phosphorylation of the SRC epithelial substrate Trask is tightly regulated in normal epithelia but widespread in many human epithelial cancers. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2009;15:2311–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Spassov DS, Baehner FL, Wong CH, McDonough S, Moasser MM. The transmembrane src substrate Trask is an epithelial protein that signals during anchorage deprivation. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:1756–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Leroy C, et al. CUB-domain-containing protein 1 overexpression in solid cancers promotes cancer cell growth by activating Src family kinases. Oncogene. 2015;34:5593–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Nelson LJ, et al. Src kinase is biphosphorylated at Y416/Y527 and activates the CUB-domain containing protein 1/protein kinase C delta pathway in a subset of triple-negative breast cancers. Am J Pathol. 2020;190:484–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sakai T, Jove R, Fassler R, Mosher DF. Role of the cytoplasmic tyrosines of beta 1A integrins in transformation by v-src. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:3808–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Datta A, Huber F, Boettiger D. Phosphorylation of beta3 integrin controls ligand binding strength. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:3943–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Schumacher S, Vazquez Nunez R, Biertumpfel C, Mizuno N. Bottom-up reconstitution of focal adhesion complexes. FEBS J. 2022;289:3360–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mishra YG, Manavathi B. Focal adhesion dynamics in cellular function and disease. Cell Signal. 2021;85: 110046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Benlimame N, et al. FAK signaling is critical for ErbB-2/ErbB-3 receptor cooperation for oncogenic transformation and invasion. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:505–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lahlou H, et al. Mammary epithelial-specific disruption of the focal adhesion kinase blocks mammary tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20302–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Bianchi-Smiraglia A, Paesante S, Bakin AV. Integrin beta5 contributes to the tumorigenic potential of breast cancer cells through the Src-FAK and MEK-ERK signaling pathways. Oncogene. 2013;32:3049–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lee JJ, et al. Inhibition of epithelial cell migration and Src/FAK signaling by SIRT3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:7057–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Fatherree JP, Guarin JR, McGinn RA, Naber SP, Oudin MJ. Chemotherapy-induced collagen IV drives cancer cell motility through activation of Src and focal adhesion kinase. Can Res. 2022;82:2031–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Mekhdjian AH, et al. Integrin-mediated traction force enhances paxillin molecular associations and adhesion dynamics that increase the invasiveness of tumor cells into a three-dimensional extracellular matrix. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:1467–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang S, et al. CCM3 is a gatekeeper in focal adhesions regulating mechanotransduction and YAP/TAZ signalling. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23:758–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Qian X, et al. The Tensin-3 protein, including its SH2 domain, is phosphorylated by Src and contributes to tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:246–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Courtneidge SA, Azucena EF, Pass I, Seals DF, Tesfay L. The SRC substrate Tks5, podosomes (invadopodia), and cancer cell invasion. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Joshi B, et al. Phosphocaveolin-1 is a mechanotransducer that induces caveola biogenesis via Egr1 transcriptional regulation. J Cell Biol. 2012;199:425–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yoon HJ, Kim DH, Kim SJ, Jang JH, Surh YJ. Src-mediated phosphorylation, ubiquitination and degradation of Caveolin-1 promotes breast cancer cell stemness. Cancer Lett. 2019;449:8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Ngan E, et al. LPP is a Src substrate required for invadopodia formation and efficient breast cancer lung metastasis. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Centonze G, et al. p130Cas/BCAR1 and p140Cap/SRCIN1 Adaptors: The Yin Yang in Breast Cancer? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 729093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wu MH, et al. MCT-1 expression and PTEN deficiency synergistically promote neoplastic multinucleation through the Src/p190B signaling activation. Oncogene. 2014;33:5109–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Sausgruber N, et al. Tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 increases cell motility in triple-negative breast cancer through the activation of SRC-family kinases. Oncogene. 2015;34:2272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tognoli ML, et al. RASSF1C oncogene elicits amoeboid invasion, cancer stemness, and extracellular vesicle release via a SRC/Rho axis. EMBO J. 2021;40: e107680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Lu Y, et al. Src family protein-tyrosine kinases alter the function of PTEN to regulate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT cascades. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:40057–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Hirsch DS, Shen Y, Dokmanovic M, Wu WJ. pp60c-Src phosphorylates and activates vacuolar protein sorting 34 to mediate cellular transformation. Can Res. 2010;70:5974–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Li H, et al. Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 4 is associated with breast cancer metastasis through Src-mediated Akt tyrosine phosphorylation. Oncogene. 2014;33:4589–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Jiang T, Qiu Y. Interaction between Src and a C-terminal proline-rich motif of Akt is required for Akt activation. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:15789–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ma X, et al. Characterization of the Src-regulated kinome identifies SGK1 as a key mediator of Src-induced transformation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Si Y, et al. Src inhibits the hippo tumor suppressor pathway through tyrosine phosphorylation of lats1. Can Res. 2017;77:4868–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Lamar JM, et al. SRC tyrosine kinase activates the YAP/TAZ axis and thereby drives tumor growth and metastasis. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:2302–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Garcia-Higuera I, et al. Genomic stability and tumour suppression by the APC/C cofactor Cdh1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:802–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Han T, et al. Interplay between c-Src and the APC/C co-activator Cdh1 regulates mammary tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Easton DF, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature. 2007;447:1087–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Maretzky T, et al. Src stimulates fibroblast growth factor receptor-2 shedding by an ADAM15 splice variant linked to breast cancer. Can Res. 2009;69:4573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Jin L, et al. Phosphorylation-mediated activation of LDHA promotes cancer cell invasion and tumour metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36:3797–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Phan J, Reue K. Lipin, a lipodystrophy and obesity gene. Cell Metab. 2005;1:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Song L, et al. Proto-oncogene Src links lipogenesis via lipin-1 to breast cancer malignancy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Silva CM. Role of STATs as downstream signal transducers in Src family kinase-mediated tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:8017–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Garcia R, et al. Constitutive activation of Stat3 by the Src and JAK tyrosine kinases participates in growth regulation of human breast carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2001;20:2499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Kloth MT, et al. STAT5b, a mediator of synergism between c-Src and the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:1671–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Lu H, et al. Chemotherapy-induced Ca(2+) release stimulates breast cancer stem cell enrichment. Cell Rep. 2017;18:1946–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Jiang L, et al. NCAPG confers trastuzumab resistance via activating SRC/STAT3 signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Calvo F, et al. Mechanotransduction and YAP-dependent matrix remodelling is required for the generation and maintenance of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:637–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Sorrentino G, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor signalling activates YAP in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Liu Q, et al. HOMER3 facilitates growth factor-mediated beta-Catenin tyrosine phosphorylation and activation to promote metastasis in triple negative breast cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kim H, Son S, Ko Y, Shin I. CTGF regulates cell proliferation, migration, and glucose metabolism through activation of FAK signaling in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene. 2021;40:2667–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Lu G, et al. Phosphorylation of ETS1 by Src family kinases prevents its recognition by the COP1 tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:222–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Arnold SF, Vorojeikina DP, Notides AC. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 537 on the human estrogen receptor is required for binding to an estrogen response element. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:30205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Arnold SF, Obourn JD, Jaffe H, Notides AC. Phosphorylation of the human estrogen receptor on tyrosine 537 in vivo and by src family tyrosine kinases in vitro. Mol Endocrinol. 1995;9:24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ma L, et al. Kindlin-2 promotes Src-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of androgen receptor and contributes to breast cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Chu I, et al. p27 phosphorylation by Src regulates inhibition of cyclin E-Cdk2. Cell. 2007;128:281–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Marcotte R, Smith HW, Sanguin-Gendreau V, McDonough RV, Muller WJ. Mammary epithelial-specific disruption of c-Src impairs cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:2808–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Richard S, et al. Sam68 haploinsufficiency delays onset of mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis. Oncogene. 2008;27:548–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Fraser C, et al. Rapid discovery and structure-activity relationships of pyrazolopyrimidines that potently suppress breast cancer cell growth via SRC kinase inhibition with exceptional selectivity over ABL kinase. J Med Chem. 2016;59:4697–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Jallal H, et al. A Src/Abl kinase inhibitor, SKI-606, blocks breast cancer invasion, growth, and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. Can Res. 2007;67:1580–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Vultur A, et al. SKI-606 (bosutinib), a novel Src kinase inhibitor, suppresses migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7:1185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Hebbard L, et al. Control of mammary tumor differentiation by SKI-606 (bosutinib). Oncogene. 2011;30:301–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Campone M, et al. Phase II study of single-agent bosutinib, a Src/Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer pretreated with chemotherapy. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2012;23:610–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Moy B, et al. Bosutinib in combination with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole: a phase II trial in postmenopausal women evaluating first-line endocrine therapy in locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:348–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Moy B, et al. Bosutinib in combination with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane: a phase II trial in postmenopausal women with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:346–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Isakoff SJ, et al. Bosutinib plus capecitabine for selected advanced solid tumours: results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:2058–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Beetham H, et al. Loss of integrin-linked kinase sensitizes breast cancer to SRC inhibitors. Can Res. 2022;82:632–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Lombardo LJ, et al. Discovery of N-(2-chloro-6-methyl- phenyl)-2-(6-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)- piperazin-1-yl)-2-methylpyrimidin-4- ylamino)thiazole-5-carboxamide (BMS-354825), a dual Src/Abl kinase inhibitor with potent antitumor activity in preclinical assays. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6658–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Mayer EL, et al. A phase 2 trial of dasatinib in patients with advanced HER2-positive and/or hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2011;17:6897–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Herold CI, et al. Phase II trial of dasatinib in patients with metastatic breast cancer using real-time pharmacodynamic tissue biomarkers of Src inhibition to escalate dosing. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2011;17:6061–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Schott AF, et al. Phase II studies of two different schedules of dasatinib in bone metastasis predominant metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0622. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;159:87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Pusztai L, et al. Gene signature-guided dasatinib therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2014;20:5265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Fornier MN, et al. A phase I study of dasatinib and weekly paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2011;22:2575–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Morris PG, et al. Phase II study of paclitaxel and dasatinib in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:387–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Somlo G, et al. Dasatinib plus capecitabine for advanced breast cancer: safety and efficacy in phase I study CA180004. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2013;19:1884–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Paul D, et al. Randomized phase-II evaluation of letrozole plus dasatinib in hormone receptor positive metastatic breast cancer patients. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Soriano P, Montgomery C, Geske R, Bradley A. Targeted disruption of the c-src proto-oncogene leads to osteopetrosis in mice. Cell. 1991;64:693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Mitri Z, et al. TBCRC-010: phase I/II study of dasatinib in combination with zoledronic acid for the treatment of breast cancer bone metastasis. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2016;22:5706–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Ocana A, et al. A phase I study of the SRC kinase inhibitor dasatinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first line therapy for patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer: GEICAM/2010–04 study. Oncotarget. 2017;8:73144–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Ocana A, et al. Efficacy and safety of dasatinib with trastuzumab and paclitaxel in first line HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the phase II GEICAM/2010-04 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174:693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Herynk MH, et al. Cooperative action of tamoxifen and c-Src inhibition in preventing the growth of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:3023–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Jain S, et al. Src inhibition blocks c-Myc translation and glucose metabolism to prevent the development of breast cancer. Can Res. 2015;75:4863–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Gucalp A, et al. Phase II trial of saracatinib (AZD0530), an oral SRC-inhibitor for the treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11:306–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Temps C, et al. A Conformation selective mode of inhibiting SRC improves drug efficacy and tolerability. Can Res. 2021;81:5438–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Cortes J, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1817–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Schmid P, et al. Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (IMpassion130): updated efficacy results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82203857 to JL; Grant No. 82072901 and 32000679 to PL), Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20210324120409026 to PL), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515110285 to PL and 2021A1515111052 to JL), and the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research (No. 2021B1212040006).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Juan Luo and Hailin Zou contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Juan Luo, Hailin Zou, Yibo Guo, Tongyu Tong, Liping Ye, Chengming Zhu, Yihang Pan & Peng Li

  2. Department of Urology, Pelvic Floor Disorders Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Tongyu Tong

  3. Department of General Surgery, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Liang Deng

  4. Department of Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Bo Wang

  5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, 518107, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

    Yihang Pan & Peng Li

Authors
  1. Juan Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hailin Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yibo Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tongyu Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liping Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chengming Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Liang Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Bo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yihang Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PL conceived and designed the study; JL and PL wrote the initial manuscript; JL, HZ, YG, TT and PL revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the submission and final publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luo, J., Zou, H., Guo, Y. et al. SRC kinase-mediated signaling pathways and targeted therapies in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 24, 99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01596-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01596-y

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • SRC kinase
  • Signaling transduction
  • Tyrosine phosphorylation
  • Targeted therapy

Breast Cancer Research

ISSN: 1465-542X

Contact us