Skip to main content
Download PDF

Impact of somatic PI3K pathway and ERBB family mutations on pathological complete response (pCR) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapies

Breast Cancer Research volume 19, Article number: 87 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis revealed that somatic EGFR, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (ERBB2), Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB3) and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4 (ERBB4) gene mutations (ERBB family mutations) occur alone or co-occur with somatic mutations in the gene encoding the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) catalytic subunit (PIK3CA) in 19% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancers. Because ERBB family mutations can activate the PI3K/AKT pathway and likely have similar canonical signalling effects to PI3K pathway mutations, we investigated their combined impact on response to neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapies.

Methods

Baseline tumour biopsies were available from 74 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who were enrolled in the phase II TCHL neoadjuvant study (ICORG 10-05) assessing TCH (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab) (n = 38) versus TCL (docetaxel, carboplatin, lapatinib) (n = 10) versus TCHL (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, lapatinib) (n = 40), each for six cycles. Activating mutations in PIK3CA and ERBB family genes were identified using mass spectrometry-based genotyping. Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

PIK3CA and/or ERBB family mutations were detected in 23 (31.1%) tumour samples tested, whereas PTEN expression was low in 31.1% of cases tested. Mutation frequency was similar in each treatment arm (31.3% in TCH arm, 30% in TCL arm and 31.3% in TCHL arm) and was not influenced by oestrogen receptor (ER) status (27.6% in ER-negative patients, 33.3% in ER-positive patients) or progesterone receptor (PR) status (32.6% in PR-negative patients, 29% in PR-positive patients). There was no significant difference in pathological complete response (pCR) rates between 47 patients with wild-type (WT) tumours and 22 patients whose tumours carried mutations (in either PIK3CA or ERBB family genes) (42.5% vs. 54.5%; p = 0.439). Similarly, there was no significant difference in pCR rates between patients with PIK3CA/ERBB family mutated/PTEN-low (i.e., PI3K-activated) tumours and patients without PI3K activation (50% vs. 44%; p = 0.769). However, in the TCHL (but not the TCH) group, the pCR rate was higher for 9 patients with PIK3CA/ERBB family mutated tumours than for 20 patients with PIK3CA/ERBB family WT tumours (77.8% vs. 35%; p = 0.05).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that patients who receive neoadjuvant TCHL and have PIK3CA/ERBB family mutated tumours may be more likely to have a pCR than patients with WT tumours.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01485926. Registered on 2 December 2011.

Background

Approximately 20% of primary breast cancers have an alteration, usually amplification, of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene. HER2-amplified cancers have an inferior prognosis, with more frequent and more rapid metastatic relapse [1]. The addition of trastuzumab to conventional chemotherapy has significantly improved the outcomes for patients with both early-stage and metastatic HER2-altered breast cancer, with significantly improved survival in both settings [2]. Although a small minority of patients with HER2-positive metastatic disease achieve durable complete remissions, approximately 80% to 90% develop progressive cancer. Addition of trastuzumab to pre-operative chemotherapy results in 30% to 50% of patients achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) [2]. Despite this, approximately 20% of patients with HER2-positive early-stage disease and 90% of patients with metastatic disease will die from disease which is resistant to trastuzumab. Newer targeted anti-HER2 agents have been studied in an attempt to overcome trastuzumab resistance [3,4,5].

One such agent is lapatinib, a small-molecule inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (ERBB2). In a large randomised trial, the addition of lapatinib to capecitabine in patients whose cancer had progressed following treatment with anthracycline, taxanes and trastuzumab was associated with statistically prolonged progression-free survival compared with capecitabine alone [6]. Evidence suggests that combined targeting of both the extracellular domain of HER2 with trastuzumab and the kinase domain with lapatinib may further improve response. We have shown that combined treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib improves response to chemotherapy in SKBR3 breast cancer cells and decreases tumour growth in BT-474 xenografts [7], with the combination also showing improved response in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in some clinical trials [8,9,10,11]. However, the benefit of combined HER2-targeted therapy has not been shown consistently. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-41 demonstrated no significant difference in pCR rates between patients receiving the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib and those receiving either single agent [12], while the EORTC 10054 study demonstrated a numerically higher but non-significant benefit of double anti-HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and lapatinib [13]. Thus, to determine for ourselves whether the addition of lapatinib to, or the substitution of lapatinib for, trastuzumab would improve pCR, we initiated protocol ICORG 10-05, a prospective, randomised trial with stage Ic/II/III HER2-positive breast cancer patients (NCT01485926) [14].

Activating somatic mutations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway are present in a range of tumour types [15, 16]. Mutations in PIK3CA occur in approximately one-third of breast cancers [17], and these mutations have been implicated in the development of trastuzumab resistance [18, 19]. Ligand binding to ERBB family members activates intracellular signalling pathways such as the PI3K/AKT pathway [20]. Trastuzumab and lapatinib block this signalling, either by binding ERBB2 at the cell surface or by directly inhibiting the kinase activity of both EGFR and ERBB2 [20]. Possible resistance mechanisms include constitutive activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway through somatic mutations in the PI3K pathway or altered intracellular signalling involving loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) [18].

Mutations in EGFR, ERBB2, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (ERBB3) and Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4 (ERBB4) (referred to hereinafter as ERBB family mutations) either occur alone or co-occur with PIK3CA mutations in 19% of HER2-positive breast cancers (n = 58) [21, 22]. Because ERBB-mediated effects are dependent on PI3K/AKT signalling and ERBB family mutations can activate the PI3K/AKT pathway, it is likely that they have similar canonical signalling effects to PI3K pathway mutations and PTEN loss. Therefore, the primary aim of our study was to investigate the association of pCR with ERBB family and PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss (defined as PI3K pathway activation) in primary HER2-positive breast cancer treated with one or two HER2-targeting agents.

Methods

Patient population and samples

TCHL (ICORG10-05) (NCT01485926) is a phase II neoadjuvant study assessing TCH (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab), TCL (docetaxel, carboplatin, lapatinib) and TCHL (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, lapatinib) in stages Ic–III HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Full details of the trial are available at www.clinicaltrials.gov. Eighty-eight patients were randomised to receive either neoadjuvant TCH (six cycles q3weekly (every 3 weeks) docetaxel [75 mg/m2] + carboplatin [AUC 6] + trastuzumab 8 mg/kg on day 1 [loading dose] and 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles, q3weekly (every 3 weeks)), TCL (six cycles q3weekly (every 3 weeks) docetaxel [75 mg/m2] + carboplatin [AUC 6] + lapatinib [1000 mg daily until 1 week prior to surgery]) or TCHL (six cycles q3weekly (every 3 weeks) docetaxel [75 mg/m2] + carboplatin [AUC 6] + trastuzumab 8 mg/kg on day 1 [loading dose] and 6 mg/kg for subsequent cycles [q3weekly (every 3 weeks)] + lapatinib [1000 mg daily until 1 week prior to surgery]). Patients subsequently underwent surgery and received trastuzumab post-operatively for 1 year from the first dose of trastuzumab. The primary endpoint of the trial was to assess the efficacy of TCH, TCL and TCHL in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer using pCR. Secondary objectives were to assess the clinical response rate and overall response rate in each treatment arm in HER2-positive breast cancer patients and to examine potential molecular and pharmacological markers of response to trastuzumab- and lapatinib-based chemotherapy.

Sample processing and MassARRAY analysis

Baseline tumour biopsies obtained prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin wax (FFPE). Haematoxylin and eosin staining was performed on 3-μm sections of biopsies and assessed for tumour cellularity by a pathologist. Only samples with greater than 10% tumour cellularity were used for further analysis. DNA extraction was performed using an AllPrep™ DNA/RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Mass spectrometry-based single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping technology (Agena Bioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) was applied to DNA extracted from the FFPE biopsies to detect a total of 108 non-synonymous somatic mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3 and ERBB4. Hot spot mutations in exon 1 (R88Q, K111N), exon 4 (N345K), exon 7 (C420R, E453K), exon 9 (E542V/G/K/Q, E545K/Q/D/A/G/V, Q546H/L/P/R/E/K) and exon 20 (Y1021H/N/C, R1023Q, T1025I/A/S, A1035V/T, M1043V/I, A1046V, H1047R/L/Y, G1049R) of PIK3CA were analysed. Mutations in ERBB family genes were identified using publicly available data from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and a literature search [22]. AVSIFT and Mutation Assessor scores were used to determine the ERBB family mutations that were likely to be deleterious. A full list of mutations is provided in Additional file 1: Table S1. Matrix chips were analysed on a MassARRAY matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry system (Agena Bioscience). Visual inspection and Typer Software were used to identify genotypes on the basis of mass spectra. Reactions where greater than 15% of the resultant mutant mass ran in the mutant site were scored as positive.

PTEN immunohistochemistry

PTEN immunohistochemistry was performed on 4-μm sections of FFPE tumour biopsies as described previously [23]. Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinised and rehydrated prior to antigen retrieval at 100 °C for 20 minutes with Bond Epitope Retrieval Solution 1 (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 3% peroxidase for 5 minutes. PTEN antibody (clone 6H2.1; Dako/Agilent Technologies, Glostrup, Denmark) was applied at 1:100 dilution, and primary antibody detection was carried out using a polymer system (Bond Polymer Refine Detection; Leica Biosystems). Staining development was achieved by incubation with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) and DAB enhancer (Leica Biosystems). PTEN immunohistochemistry was scored by a pathologist as follows. PTEN was considered absent (score = 0) if no immunostaining was detectable in breast carcinoma cells but was present in adjacent benign stromal cells (which acted as an internal control), scored as 1+ if cytoplasmic immunostaining was weak, as 2+ if cytoplasmic immunostaining in carcinoma cells was intermediate, and as 3+ if the cytoplasmic immunostaining in breast carcinoma cells was strong.

Statistical analysis

Differences in pCR rates by mutation and PTEN status were calculated with a corresponding 95% CI and tested using a χ2 test of association. The treatment effect was further examined by performing χ2 tests of association on pCR and mutation status and PTEN status for each treatment arm separately.

Results

Patient characteristics

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the TCHL clinical trial [14]. The median age of the patients at diagnosis was 49 years. Of the 88 patients 53 (60.2%) had oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumours, whereas 34 (38.6%) had progesterone receptor (PR)-positive tumours. Thirty-eight (43.2%) of the patients had a pCR (defined as no residual invasive tumour in the breast or lymph nodes at surgery). Also, 38 (43.2%) of the patients received trastuzumab (TCH), whereas 40 (45.4%) of the patients received the combination of lapatinib and trastuzumab (TCHL). Only 10 (11.4%) of the patients received lapatinib alone (TCL), because this arm of the trial was closed early owing to preliminary data emerging from the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation (ALTTO) study indicating that TCL treatment was inferior to TCH or TCHL in terms of patient survival outcomes [24]. The full clinical characteristics of the patient cohort are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Patient clinical characteristics
Full size table

Somatic mutation profiling

Each biopsy taken prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed for tumour cellularity by a pathologist, and samples with less than 10% tumour material or that produced low DNA yield were excluded from the analysis, which left a total of 74 tumour samples for sequencing analysis. MassARRAY analysis was used to identify hot spot mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3 and ERBB4. PIK3CA mutations alone were detected in 15 breast tumour samples (20.3%), whereas EGFR mutations alone were detected in 2 samples (2.7%). ERBB3 and ERBB4 mutations alone were each detected in one sample (1.4%). No activating mutations were detected in ERBB2. EGFR, ERBB3 and ERBB4 mutations co-occurred with PIK3CA mutations in 1 sample each (1.4%), whereas 1 sample had co-occurring ERBB3 and ERBB4 mutations (1.4%) (Fig. 1), giving an overall PIK3CA and/or ERBB mutation frequency of 31.1% (23 samples). This overall mutation frequency was similar in each treatment arm (30% in TCL arm [three samples], 31.3% in TCH arm [ten samples], and 31.3% in TCHL arm [ten samples]) and was not influenced by ER status (27.6% in ER-negative tumours, 33.3% in ER-positive tumours) or PR status (32.6% in PR-negative tumours, 29% in PR-positive tumours) (Table 2). Specific mutations identified are detailed in Additional file 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Frequency of somatic PIK3CA and/or ERBB family mutations in baseline tumour biopsies from 74 patients enrolled in the TCHL clinical trial where adequate tumour was available following quality control. EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor, ERBB3 Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3, ERBB4 Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4

Full size image
Table 2 Somatic mutation genotyping results by oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status and treatment arm
Full size table

PTEN expression and its overlap with mutation status

We examined the expression of PTEN protein by immunohistochemical analysis in the diagnostic biopsies of 45 tumours where there was sufficient tissue for PTEN evaluation. Representative staining patterns for each parameter are shown in Fig. 2a. Fourteen (31.1%) of 45 tumours were considered to have low (absent or weak) PTEN expression (0/1+) in the tumour (Fig. 2b). No differences in expression rates were seen among the three different treatment arms (Table 3). Low PTEN expression, although less frequent in cases with concurrent PIK3CA/ERBB mutations (10 [22.2%] of 45 vs. 4 [8.9%] of 45), was not mutually exclusive with PIK3CA/ERBB mutations (Fig. 2c). Low PTEN expression was more frequently seen in PR-negative than in PR-positive tumours (37.9% vs. 18.8%); however, there was no difference in the frequency of low PTEN expression between ER-negative and ER-positive tumours (31.6% vs. 30.8%) (Table 3). PI3K pathway activation (defined by a PIK3CA/ERBB mutation and/or low expression of PTEN) was found in 25 (55.6%) tumours overall and was not influenced by either ER or PR status: 57.9% of ER-negative tumours and 53.8% of ER-positive tumours had an activated PI3K pathway, whereas 58.6% of PR-negative and 50% of PR-positive tumours had an activated PI3K pathway. PI3K pathway activation also occurred at similar frequencies in each treatment arm (66.7% in TCL arm [4 samples], 61.9% in TCH arm [13 samples] and 44.4% in TCHL arm [8 samples]) (Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Immunohistochemical staining patterns of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN). No immunostaining was detectable in breast carcinoma cells, but it was present in adjacent benign stromal cells (0; A), cytoplasmic immunostaining weak (1+; B), cytoplasmic immunostaining in carcinoma cells intermediate (2+; C), cytoplasmic immunostaining strong (3+; D) (scale bars = 50 μm). b Frequency of tumours with 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ immunostaining. All images were taken at × 40 original magnification. c Frequency of PIK3CA/ERBB mutations, low expression of PTEN, and co-occurring PIK3CA/ERBB mutations and low expression of PTEN (i.e., PI3K pathway activated) in 45 baseline tumour biopsies that were evaluable for PTEN expression

Full size image
Table 3 Somatic mutation genotyping and phosphatase and tensin homolog immunohistochemistry results by oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status and treatment arm
Full size table

Mutation and PTEN status and pCR

In the combined TCH/TCHL study population, we analysed the association between tumour mutation status and pCR, as defined by no invasive cancer in the breast and no involvement of axillary nodes in 69 patients where pCR data were available (Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in pCR rates between 17 patients with PIK3CA mutated vs. 52 patients with PIK3CA wild-type (WT) tumours (47% vs. 46.1%; p = 1.000) or between 8 patients with ERBB family mutated vs. 61 patients with ERBB family WT tumours (62.5% vs. 47.5%; p = 0.477). When we combined tumours with PIK3CA and ERBB family mutations, there was no difference in pCR rates between 22 patients with mutated vs. 47 patients with WT tumours (54.5% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.439) (Fig. 3). We also found no difference in pCR rates between 14 patients with low tumour PTEN expression and 31 patients with moderate or strong PTEN expression in their tumours (42.9% vs. 48.4%; p = 0.759). When we combined tumours with a PIK3CA/ERBB family mutation and/or PTEN loss (i.e., PI3K pathway activated), we found no difference in pCR rates between 25 patients with PI3K activated tumours and 20 patients with tumours without an activated PI3K pathway (44% vs. 50%; p = 0.769) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Influence of PIK3CA and ERBB mutations and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression status on pathological complete response (pCR) rates using a χ2 test of association. The proportion of patients who obtained pCR is shown for the entire patient cohort. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activation is defined as the presence of one or more of the following in a breast tumour: PIK3CA or ERBB family mutations or low PTEN expression. WT Wild type

Full size image

There was no difference in overall pCR rates in each treatment arm (Table 4); however, we also specifically examined the influence of mutation status on pCR in the TCH and TCHL arms (Fig. 4). There was no difference in pCR rates in patients with either PIK3CA-mutated tumours or ERBB family-mutated tumours compared with patients with WT tumours in either the TCH or the TCHL arm (Fig. 4a and b); however, when we combined PIK3CA and ERBB family mutations, in the TCHL arm, the pCR rate was higher for 9 patients whose tumours harboured a PIK3CA and/or an ERBB family mutation compared with 20 patients with WT tumours (77.8% vs. 35%; p = 0.05) (Fig. 4c). There was no difference in pCR rates between these two groups of breast tumours in the TCH arm. The results shown in Fig. 4c suggest that a trend may exist in the data towards a benefit of TCHL treatment in patients with PIK3CA and/or ERBB family mutations, and although this was not significant after multiple testing (unadjusted p value = 0.05), it warrants further study in a larger cohort. When we included patients with low tumour expression of PTEN, there was no difference in pCR rates in patients whose tumours had a PIK3CA/ERBB family mutation and/or low PTEN expression (i.e., PI3K activated) compared with patients with WT tumours in either the TCH or the TCHL arm (Fig. 4d and e).

Table 4 Overall pathological complete response rates in the three treatment arms
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Influence of mutation and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) status on pathological complete response (pCR) rate by treatment arm using a χ2 test of association. a Influence of PIK3CA mutations in tumours on pCR in patients receiving TCH (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab) and TCHL (docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, lapatinib). b Influence of ERBB family mutations in tumours on pCR in patients receiving TCH and TCHL. c Influence of combined PIK3CA and ERBB family mutation status in tumours on pCR in patients receiving TCH and TCHL. d Influence of low PTEN expression in breast tumours on pCR in patients receiving TCH and TCHL. e Influence of tumour phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activation status on pCR in patients receiving TCH and TCHL. PI3K activation is defined as the presence of one or more of the following in a breast tumour: PIK3CA or ERBB family mutations or low PTEN expression. WT Wild type

Full size image

Figure 4c shows that 9 of 29 tumours had PIK3CA or ERBB mutations. Figure 4d shows that 5 of 18 tumours had PTEN deficiency. Figure 4e shows that 8 of 18 tumours had mutations or PTEN deficiency, meaning that only 3 of the PIK3CA/ERBB-mutant tumours (from Fig. 4c) are included in the composite analysis in Fig. 4e.

Discussion

Biomarker analysis is necessary to identify those patients most likely to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In HER2-positive breast cancer, HER2 status is still the only recognised predictive marker to select patients for anti-HER2-targeted therapy; however, in recent years, a number of other biomarkers have emerged as potential predictors for response. PI3K pathway activation is the most common signal transduction pathway alteration in breast cancer [17, 25]. It mostly results from somatic PIK3CA mutations or PTEN loss [26], but it can also be a result of mutations in ERBB family genes [20, 27]. Although a number of studies have reported on PI3K pathway activation in HER2-positive breast cancer, they have been focused mainly on its impact on response to anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic disease or in the adjuvant setting [18, 28,29,30]. In the present study, we sought to evaluate associations between activation of the PI3K pathway and the efficacy of trastuzumab and lapatinib therapy in the neoadjuvant setting in early HER2-positive breast cancer.

Whereas pre-clinical studies have shown that PI3K pathway activation contributes to resistance to anti-HER2-targeted therapies [18, 31], clinical studies have failed to give a clear answer. In the Neoadjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial (NeoALTTO), tumours with PIK3CA mutations had lower pCR rates after treatment with neoadjuvant paclitaxel plus HER2-targeted therapy, with pCR rates decreasing from 34.5% in PIK3CA WT tumours to 21.3% in mutated tumours [32]. Results from two sequential neoadjuvant studies (NCT00133796 and NCT00206427) demonstrated that patients with tumours with low PTEN expression or PI3K pathway mutations were less likely to achieve a pCR after neoadjuvant trastuzumab/docetaxel than patients with tumours with no PI3K pathway mutations or high PTEN expression (18.2% vs. 66.7%; p = 0.015) [33]. In the Chemotherapy, Herceptin and Lapatinib in Operable Breast cancer (CHER-LOB) study, similar pCR rates after neoadjuvant paclitaxel for 12 weeks followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for four courses every 3 weeks plus HER2-targeted therapy were seen in patients with PIK3CA-WT and PIK3CA-mutated breast cancers (33.3% vs. 22.7%; p = 0.323) [34]. A recent meta-analysis of pooled data from five neoadjuvant clinical trials demonstrated lower pCR rates in the PIK3CA mutant cohort than in the WT cohort (16.2% vs. 29.6%; p < 0.001) [35].

In the present study, somatic PIK3CA mutations were found in 24.3% of tumours, and ERBB family mutations were found in 10.8% of tumours, with a similar distribution in ER-positive or ER-negative tumours, which confirms results of previous studies [17, 21, 22]. Reduced PTEN expression was found in 31.1% of tumours. Combining these aberrations which result in activation of the PI3K pathway, we find 55.6% of tumours with PI3K pathway activation (Fig. 2c). However, there was no correlation between activation of the PI3K pathway and response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant therapy in all study patients as measured by pCR (Fig. 3). The rate of pCR was similar among tumours with activation of the PI3K pathway (defined as a PIK3CA mutation and/or low PTEN expression and/or an ERBB family mutation) and among tumours without a PIK3CA or ERBB family mutation or low PTEN expression (44% vs. 50%; p = 0.769) (Fig. 3).

Pre-clinical studies suggest that PTEN loss may be a potential mechanism of resistance to HER2-targeted therapies [36, 37]. In the neoadjuvant setting, results are more variable. Dave et al. [33] showed that patients with low PTEN expression who received trastuzumab had lower pCR rates than those with high PTEN expression (15.4% vs. 44.4%). However, in those patients who received lapatinib, low expression of PTEN was significantly associated with higher pCR rates than high expression (92.3% vs. 41.2%; p = 0.007). In the GeparQuattro study, low PTEN expression was also associated with lower response to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy compared with high PTEN expression (27.6% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.010) [38]. In our present study, we did not find any association between PTEN expression and pCR, similar to the results of the NeoALTTO study [39]. The differences between the studies may be attributable to a lack of standardisation of PTEN detection and scoring methods, as well as to the lack of a standardised definition for low and high PTEN expression.

In the TCH arm, as in all study patients, the pCR rates were not significantly affected by PIK3CA or ERBB family mutations or by PTEN or PI3K activation status. In contrast, in the TCHL arm, patients with PIK3CA and/or ERBB family mutated tumours were more likely to achieve a pCR than patients with PIK3CA and ERBB WT tumours (77.8% vs. 35%; p = 0.05) (Fig. 3). Our results are in contrast to NeoALTTO, where patients treated with a combination of weekly paclitaxel, trastuzumab and lapatinib who had PIK3CA-WT tumours had a pCR rate of 53.1%, which decreased to 28.6% in patients with tumours harbouring PIK3CA mutations [32]. The difference in the impact of PIK3CA mutations in the two studies may be attributable to the low sample size in the TCHL cohort. Our study also included analysis of additional biomarkers of PI3K/AKT activation, including ERBB family mutations, which suggests that a trend may exist within the data towards a benefit of TCHL treatment in patients with PIK3CA and/or ERBB family mutations, and this warrants further study in a larger cohort. Furthermore, it is worth noting that the neoadjuvant regimens used are different in the relevant study arms. TCHL for six cycles was used in our study versus HL (trastuzumab and lapatinib) followed by weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks with HL in NeoALLTO; therefore, sensitivity to the chemotherapy part of the regimen itself cannot be ruled out.

The finding that activating mutations in a signalling pathway can increase sensitivity to targeted therapies is not unusual. The tyrosine kinase inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib show significant clinical responses in lung adenocarcinoma patients harbouring EGFR activating mutations [40], whereas dacomitinib, a pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor has been shown to be beneficial in HER2-mutated lung tumours [41]. ERBB4 has been shown to be highly mutated in melanoma, where ERBB4 mutations increase ERBB4 kinase activity despite similar expression of the HER4 protein and sensitise cells to lapatinib [42]. In some, though not all, clinical studies, the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib has been shown to be more effective than each drug given alone, likely because acquired drug resistance that results from the activation of alternate pro-survival pathways can be overcome by combination treatments [43]. In vitro, while PIK3CA mutated HER2-positive BT474 cells stably expressing the ERBB2-T798M mutation were resistant to trastuzumab, the addition of lapatinib or cetuximab restored sensitivity [44], likely through blocking heterodimer formation [44].

A limitation of our study and other studies is the absence of a group not treated with anti-HER2 therapy. Given that all patients received chemotherapy in association with anti-HER2 treatment, and also that there was considerable heterogeneity in the chemotherapy treatment regimens used between the studies, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of our findings are contributed to by sensitivity to the chemotherapy part of the regimen itself. We also acknowledge that our study is small, and it may be useful to validate these results in a larger cohort, where there will be a greater power to demonstrate a positive interaction between mutation status and pCR.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge this is the first study looking at the effects of PI3K pathway activation through a combination of PIK3CA gene mutations, ERBB family gene mutations and low PTEN expression on pCR in the neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Our study confirms the high prevalence of mutations that result in activation of the PI3K pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer and their potential utility in predicting patients most likely to respond to combination anti-HER2 therapy. Because this is also the first report on the impact of PIK3CA mutations on responsiveness to neoadjuvant taxane plus carboplatin-based HER2-targeted therapy regimens, with other studies such as NeoALLTO involving neoadjuvant taxane- or taxane/anthracycline-based HER2-targeted therapy regimens, our findings need validation in other studies.

Abbreviations

ALTTO:

Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimisation

CHER-LOB:

Chemotherapy, Herceptin and Lapatinib in Operable Breast cancer study

DAB:

3,3′-Diaminobenzidine

EGFR:

Epidermal growth factor receptor

ER:

Oestrogen receptor

ERBB2:

Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2

ERBB3:

Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 3

ERBB4:

Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 4

FFPE:

Fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin wax

HER2:

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

LN:

Lymph node

NeoALTTO:

Neoadjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial

pCR:

Pathological complete response

PI3K:

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

PR:

Progesterone receptor

PTEN:

Phosphatase and tensin homolog

TCH:

Docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab

TCHL:

Docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, lapatinib

TCL:

Docetaxel, carboplatin, lapatinib

WT:

Wild type

References

  1. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235(4785):177–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Procter M, Leyland-Jones B, Goldhirsch A, Untch M, Smith I, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(16):1659–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hurvitz SA, Dirix L, Kocsis J, Bianchi GV, Lu J, Vinholes J, et al. Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(9):1157–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Baselga J, Gelmon KA, Verma S, Wardley A, Conte P, Miles D, et al. Phase II trial of pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer that progressed during prior trastuzumab therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1138–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(19):1783–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, Chan S, Romieu CG, Pienkowski T, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2733–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. O’Donovan N, Byrne AT, O’Connor AE, McGee S, Gallagher WM, Crown J. Synergistic interaction between trastuzumab and EGFR/HER-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors in HER-2 positive breast cancer cells. Investig New Drugs. 2011;29(5):752–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guarneri V, Frassoldati A, Bottini A, Cagossi K, Bisagni G, Sarti S, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: results of the randomized phase II CHER-LOB study. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(16):1989–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J, Eidtmann H, Kaufmann M, Blohmer JU, et al. Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(2):135–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, Salat C, Denkert C, Rezai M, et al. Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):747–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H, Di Cosimo S, de Azambuja E, Aura C, et al. Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9816):633–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robidoux A, Tang G, Rastogi P, Geyer Jr CE, Azar CA, Atkins JN, et al. Lapatinib as a component of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive operable breast cancer (NSABP protocol B-41): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(12):1183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonnefoi H, Jacot W, Saghatchian M, Moldovan C, Venat-Bouvet L, Zaman K, et al. Neoadjuvant treatment with docetaxel plus lapatinib, trastuzumab, or both followed by an anthracycline-based chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: results of the randomised phase II EORTC 10054 study. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(2):325–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crown JL, Keane M, Kennedy J, O’Reilly S, Kelly C, O’Connor M, et al. Randomized phase II study of pre-operative docetaxel, carboplatin with trastuzumab (TCH) and/or/lapatinib (L) in HER-2 positive (H+) breast cancer patients (BC pts). ICORG 10-05 [abstract]. Cancer Res. 2013;73(24 Suppl):Abstract P4-12-25. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS13-P4-12-25.

  15. Hennessy BT, Smith DL, Ram PT, Lu Y, Mills GB. Exploiting the PI3K/AKT pathway for cancer drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(12):988–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bachman KE, Argani P, Samuels Y, Silliman N, Ptak J, Szabo S, et al. The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol Ther. 2004;3(8):772–5. A published erratum appears in Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4(2):133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stemke-Hale K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Lluch A, Neve RM, Kuo WL, Davies M, et al. An integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN, and AKT mutations in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008;68(15):6084–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Berns K, Horlings HM, Hennessy BT, Madiredjo M, Hijmans EM, Beelen K, et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(4):395–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Brien NA, Browne BC, Chow L, Wang Y, Ginther C, Arboleda J, et al. Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase/AKT signaling confers resistance to trastuzumab but not lapatinib. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9(6):1489–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elster N, Collins DM, Toomey S, Crown J, Eustace AJ, Hennessy BT. HER2-family signalling mechanisms, clinical implications and targeting in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149(1):5–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6(269):l1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012;2(5):401–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Djordjevic B, Hennessy BT, Li J, Barkoh BA, Luthra R, Mills GB, et al. Clinical assessment of PTEN loss in endometrial carcinoma: immunohistochemistry outperforms gene sequencing. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(5):699–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Piccart-Gebhart M, Holmes E, Baselga J, de Azambuja E, Dueck AC, Viale G, et al. Adjuvant lapatinib and trastuzumab for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1034–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9(8):550–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brugge J, Hung MC, Mills GB. A new mutational AKTivation in the PI3K pathway. Cancer Cell. 2007;12(2):104–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Herter-Sprie GS, Greulich H, Wong KK. Activating mutations in ERBB2 and their impact on diagnostics and treatment. Front Oncol. 2013;3:86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jensen JD, Knoop A, Laenkholm AV, Grauslund M, Jensen MB, Santoni-Rugiu E, et al. PIK3CA mutations, PTEN, and pHER2 expression and impact on outcome in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2034–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loi S, Michiels S, Lambrechts D, Fumagalli D, Claes B, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, et al. Somatic mutation profiling and associations with prognosis and trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(13):960–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandarlapaty S, Sakr RA, Giri D, Patil S, Heguy A, Morrow M, et al. Frequent mutational activation of the PI3K-AKT pathway in trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(24):6784–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Elster N, Cremona M, Morgan C, Toomey S, Carr A, O’Grady A, et al. A preclinical evaluation of the PI3K alpha/delta dominant inhibitor BAY 80-6946 in HER2-positive breast cancer models with acquired resistance to the HER2-targeted therapies trastuzumab and lapatinib. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;149(2):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Majewski IJ, Nuciforo P, Mittempergher L, Bosma AJ, Eidtmann H, Holmes E, et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with decreased benefit to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(12):1334–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Dave B, Migliaccio I, Gutierrez MC, Wu MF, Chamness GC, Wong H, et al. Loss of phosphatase and tensin homolog or phosphoinositol-3 kinase activation and response to trastuzumab or lapatinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing locally advanced breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(2):166–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guarneri V, Dieci MV, Frassoldati A, Maiorana A, Ficarra G, Bettelli S, et al. Prospective biomarker analysis of the randomized CHER-LOB study evaluating the dual anti-HER2 treatment with trastuzumab and lapatinib plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Oncologist. 2015;20(9):1001–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Loibl S, Majewski I, Guarneri V, Nekljudova V, Holmes E, Bria E, et al. PIK3CA mutations are associated with reduced pathological complete response rates in primary HER2-positive breast cancer: pooled analysis of 967 patients from five prospective trials investigating lapatinib and trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(8):1519–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Eichhorn PJ, Gili M, Scaltriti M, Serra V, Guzman M, Nijkamp W, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase hyperactivation results in lapatinib resistance that is reversed by the mTOR/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BEZ235. Cancer Res. 2008;68(22):9221–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagata Y, Lan KH, Zhou X, Tan M, Esteva FJ, Sahin AA, et al. PTEN activation contributes to tumor inhibition by trastuzumab, and loss of PTEN predicts trastuzumab resistance in patients. Cancer Cell. 2004;6(2):117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Loibl S, Darb-Esfahani S, Huober J, Klimowicz A, Furlanetto J, Lederer B, et al. Integrated analysis of PTEN and p4EBP1 protein expression as predictors for pCR in HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(11):2675–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nuciforo PG, Aura C, Holmes E, Prudkin L, Jimenez J, Martinez P, et al. Benefit to neoadjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies in HER2-positive primary breast cancer is independent of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted from chromosome 10 (PTEN) status. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1494–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, Doherty J, Politi K, Sarkaria I, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from “never smokers” and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(36):13306–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kris MG, Camidge DR, Giaccone G, Hida T, Li BT, O’Connell J, et al. Targeting HER2 aberrations as actionable drivers in lung cancers: phase II trial of the pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor dacomitinib in patients with HER2-mutant or amplified tumors. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1421–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Prickett TD, Agrawal NS, Wei X, Yates KE, Lin JC, Wunderlich JR, et al. Analysis of the tyrosine kinome in melanoma reveals recurrent mutations in ERBB4. Nat Genet. 2009;41(10):1127–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Garrett JT, Olivares MG, Rinehart C, Granja-Ingram ND, Sanchez V, Chakrabarty A, et al. Transcriptional and posttranslational up-regulation of HER3 (ErbB3) compensates for inhibition of the HER2 tyrosine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(12):5021–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rexer BN, Ghosh R, Narasanna A, Estrada MV, Chakrabarty A, Song Y, et al. Human breast cancer cells harboring a gatekeeper T798M mutation in HER2 overexpress EGFR ligands and are sensitive to dual inhibition of EGFR and HER2. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(19):5390–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The TCHL study was sponsored by Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly known as the Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group [ICORG]), which received funding from GlaxoSmithKline.

Funding

This work was supported by the Irish Cancer Society Collaborative Cancer Research Centre under BREAST-PREDICT grant CCRC13GAL (www.breastpredict.com), the Health Research Board (HRA/POR2012/054), the North East Cancer Research and Education Trust, and the Science Foundation Ireland-funded Molecular Therapeutics for Cancer Ireland (08-SRC-B1410).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Medical Oncology Group, Department of Molecular Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 9, Ireland

      Sinead Toomey, Alexander J. Eustace, Aoife Carr, Malgorzata Milewska, Stephen F. Madden & Bryan T. Hennessy

    2. Department of Histopathology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

      Joanna Fay, Katherine M. Sheehan & Elaine W. Kay

    3. Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

      Ausra Teiserskiene, Brian Moulton & Bryan T. Hennessy

    4. National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

      Norma O’Donovan & John Crown

    5. Cancer Biology and Therapeutics Laboratory, UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute,, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

      William Gallagher

    6. Department of Medical Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

      Liam Grogan, Oscar Breathnach & Bryan T. Hennessy

    7. Department of Medical Oncology, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

      Janice Walshe, Guiseppe Gullo & John Crown

    8. Department of Medical Oncology, The Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

      Catherine Kelly

    9. Department of Medical Oncology, St. James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

      M. John Kennedy

    10. Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons In Ireland, Dublin, Ireland

      Arnold D. Hill & Colm Power

    11. Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

      Deirdre Duke & Niamh Hambly

    Authors
    1. Sinead Toomey
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Alexander J. Eustace
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Joanna Fay
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Katherine M. Sheehan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Aoife Carr
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Malgorzata Milewska
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Stephen F. Madden
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Ausra Teiserskiene
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Elaine W. Kay
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. Norma O’Donovan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. William Gallagher
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Liam Grogan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    13. Oscar Breathnach
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    14. Janice Walshe
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    15. Catherine Kelly
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    16. Brian Moulton
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    17. M. John Kennedy
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    18. Guiseppe Gullo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    19. Arnold D. Hill
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    20. Colm Power
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    21. Deirdre Duke
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    22. Niamh Hambly
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    23. John Crown
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    24. Bryan T. Hennessy
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Contributions

    ST, AJE, JC and BTH conceived of and designed the study. ST, AJE, JF, KMS, AC and MM developed the study methodology. ST, AJE, JF, KMS, AC, MM, AT, EWK, NO’D, WG, LG, OB, JW, CK, BM, JK, GG, ADH, CP, DD and NH acquired data. ST, AJE, SFM, JC and BTH analysed and interpreted data. ST, AJE, JF, KMS, AC, MM, AT, EWK, NO’D, WG, LG, OB, JW, CK, BM, JK, GG, AH, CP, DD, NH, JC and BTH wrote, reviewed and/or revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Sinead Toomey.

    Ethics declarations

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    In this study, we used samples that were collected under clinical trial protocols (ICORG 10-05; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01485926). Standardised ICORG procedures were used to acquire ethical approval for these studies. At the time of recruitment, patients were given an information leaflet and a consent form for storage and collection of biological materials, including blood and tissue samples, as well as future use of their samples for research purposes. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of St. James’s Hospital, Dublin; St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin; Bon Secours Hospital, Cork; Cork University Hospital; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin; Mater Misericordiae University and Private Hospitals, Dublin; Galway University Hospital, Galway; Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny; Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Limerick; Sligo General Hospital, Sligo; and Waterford Regional Hospital, Waterford.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    Additional files

    Additional file 1: Table S1.

    Non-synonymous somatic mutations in PIK3CA and ERBB family genes. (DOCX 15 kb)

    Additional file 2: Table S2.

    Specific somatic mutations in PIK3CA, EGFR, ERBB3, ERBB4 and PIK3CA detected in our patient cohort. (DOCX 13 kb)

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

    Reprints and Permissions

    About this article

    Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Toomey, S., Eustace, A.J., Fay, J. et al. Impact of somatic PI3K pathway and ERBB family mutations on pathological complete response (pCR) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapies. Breast Cancer Res 19, 87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0883-9

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0883-9

    Keywords

    • Breast cancer
    • HER2
    • Trastuzumab
    • Lapatinib
    • PI3K pathway
    • Somatic mutations

    Breast Cancer Research

    ISSN: 1465-542X

    Contact us