Open Access

IkB kinase alpha: a link in the chain of the mammary cycle

Breast Cancer Research20024:173

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr446

Received: 20 May 2002

Accepted: 18 June 2002

Published: 1 October 2002

Abstract

The transcription factor NF-κB exhibits altered activity in some breast cancers but the relevance of this association has not been established. Cao et al.'s elegant study recently published in Cell reveals a NF-κB-dependent signalling pathway responsible for epithelial proliferation in the mouse mammary gland. Could this mechanism, rather than prevention of apoptosis, be responsible for the reported association between NF-κB and breast cancer? Could the specificity of NF-κB modulators of the IkB kinase complex determine the fate of epithelial cells at different stages of mammary development?

Keywords

apoptosisIkB kinasemammaryNF-κBproliferation

Contribution and relevance to the field

In vitro studies on NF-κB signalling have contributed much to our understanding of the multiple effects of NF-κB. However, beyond the largely descriptive studies of NF-κB-related phenotypes in animal models, few studies have addressed precisely how NF-κB mediates its effects in vivo.

The study by Cao and coworkers [1] provides insight into a NF-κB-dependent signalling pathway with a specific phenotypic outcome in vivo, placing NF-κB as a key regulator of epithelial growth in the developing mammary gland. In the light of previous reports demonstrating a role for NF-κB in survival of mammary epithelial cells [2, 3], the underlying implication of the present study is that the function of NF-κB in mammary epithelial cells is context dependent and relies on a level of signalling specificity previously not appreciated.

The study involves the use of an inactivatable mutant of IKKα, a component of the heterotetrameric IkB kinase (IKK) complex responsible for activation of NF-κB by a variety of stimuli, which is thought to convey development-specific signals to NF-κB [4]. Interestingly, this mutant line (unlike IKKα null mice) was normal in nearly all respects (including NF-κB responses to proinflammatory stimuli) albeit for an abnormal mammary development, similar to that of the receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK)-deficient mice. The morphology of the IKKαaa/aa mammary gland was consistent with the expected timing of NF-κB activation in normal mammary glands of gestating mice [2]. This represents an important tissue specificity in IKKα-dependent signalling, which may have implications in other NF-κB settings and in the treatment of breast cancers.

With an upstream IKKα pathway identified, Cao et al. turned to probable downstream NF-κB targets that could be mediating the IKKα-dependent phenotype. A previous report of a similar mammary phenotype for cyclin D1 knockout mice [5] prompted them to look at cyclin D1 expression in their IKKα mutant mice. Confirmation of a marked reduction in cyclin D1 expression in these mice led to the 'clinching' experiment: overexpressing a cyclin D1 transgene in IKKα mutant mice rescued the IKK phenotype in the mammary gland. This observation confirmed the hypothesis that NF-κB regulated the cell cycle during gestation, and firmly established a linear pathway from RANK, via NF-κB, to cyclin D1.

The observation that NF-κB is responsible for proliferation of mammary epithelial cells during pregnancy is in itself not new. Brantley and colleagues had previously demonstrated that NF-κB positively regulated mammary epithelial proliferation, ductal branching and maintenance of overall mammary structure [6]. However, Cao et al.'s study is significant not only in its identification of the specific signalling pathway responsible for this NF-κB action in the mammary gland, but also in the manner in which it is achieved. The elegant use of crosses between the IKKα mutant and other transgenic lines, previously demonstrated to have mammary phenotypes, combined with tissue-restricted expression of these transgenes, thus demonstrates the increasing power of transgenics in the elucidation of complex signalling pathways.

Future perspectives

Two intriguing questions arise from the elucidation of this pathway in the mammary gland. How is the specificity for IKKα in the mammary gland achieved, and does the function of NF-κB change during the course of mammary development? Central to these questions is the identity of the NF-κB isoforms regulated throughout the mammary cycle. Could changes in signalling specificity upstream of NF-κB result in a shift in the ratio of activated NF-κB isoforms with subsequent changes in target gene expression and cellular phenotype? This has not been properly addressed for the complete mammary cycle and warrants further investigation. p52 processing was shown to be affected in IKKα mutant mice in the study of Cao et al. The relatively low level of the p52 isoform compared with the p65 and p50 isoforms, and the fact that there is no mammary phenotype in p52-deficient mice [7, 8], however, suggest that this has little or no role prior to lactation.

The relative contributions of IKKα and IKKβ to the signalling complex vary according to the requirements of the cell. IKKβ plays a predominant role in immune responses, while IKKα alone appears to be sufficient for at least some developmental systems [911]. Cao et al. suggest that the relative contribution of IKKα and IKKβ to downstream NF-κB activation may occur via alternate upstream kinases, one of which is NIK and the other yet to be defined. This conclusion is supported in an earlier study of human fibroblasts [12].

Perhaps disproportionate activation of components of the IKK complex determines NF-κB responses to specific changes in the local environment during mammary development. NF-κB DNA binding activity is biphasic during mammary development, being downregulated after pregnancy and during lactation, and reactivated at the onset of involution [2]. RANK expression is negligible in involution (Clarkson, unpublished observations, 2002) and is therefore unlikely to be the predominant NF-κB stimulus at this time. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) and Fas receptor expression is elevated during involution, and Fas-deficient mice exhibit a mammary involution phenotype [13]. Given that IKKαaa/aa cells show normal IKK and NF-κB activation in response to TNFα, it is intriguing to postulate whether TNFα or Fas, via IKKβ rather than IKKα, may be responsible for the activation of NF-κB in involution. Could NF-κB thus have distinct roles in pregnancy (proliferation) and involution (survival)? There is increasing evidence in the mammary gland and other tissues that this could indeed be the case. Observation of NF-κB in a regressing mammary gland in vivo and intervention of NF-κB in vitro suggested a role for NF-κB in mammary epithelial apoptosis [2, 3, 14]. This fits with the paradigm of NF-κB action in other cell types, particularly given the concomitant expression of TNF-receptor family members in mammary epithelial cells during involution.

Since the first conclusive description of NF-κB acting as a survival factor [15, 16] downstream of TNFα, literally hundreds of studies have reported the role of NF-κB in apoptotic programmes in a variety of contexts. This may have had the effect of skewing perception of the role of NF-κB in developing tissues, including the mammary gland. Indeed, our study of NF-κB activity in a normal mammary gland concentrated on its role in involution [2]. Studies describing altered NF-κB activities in breast cancers refer to apoptosis as a likely causal mechanism. Cao et al.'s timely contribution to the field has readdressed this balance, highlighting the importance of NF-κB in cell growth during development and its possible relevance to breast cancers.

While evocative, Cao et al.'s suggestion that their observations might explain the association between NF-κB and breast cancer belies an inconsistency in the available evidence. There have been several reports describing constitutive activity of NF-κB isoforms in human breast cancer cell lines and in primary tumours [1720]. It is unclear from these studies, however, whether NF-κB activation or suppression contributes to carcinogenesis, which isoforms are aberrantly regulated or, indeed, whether NF-κB has a causal role rather than simply being a marker of tumour differentiation. While the study of Brantley and coworkers [6] seemed to implicate NF-κB directly in the phenotypic transformation of mammary epithelial cells in virgin mice, the mechanism underlying this activity remained undefined. Direct regulation of cyclin D1 is, however, a promising proposition, as it is overexpressed in 50% of human primary breast cancers [21]. If NF-κB is found to be a major contributory factor to human breast cancers then the approach described by Cao et al., to specifically target IKKα signalling and to thereby circumvent proinflammatory pathways, would be an attractive proposition.

An alternative role for NF-κB in the mammary gland has been proposed by Soler and colleagues [22]. Their studies have implicated NF-κB in the maintenance of the epithelial barrier during remodelling of the mammary gland. This is relevant to all stages of mammary development.

These reports, taken together, support the view that NF-κB has different roles to play at different times during mammary development. At this stage, however, we cannot exclude the possibility that NF-κB is exclusively linked to cell-cycle regulation during involution.

Conclusion

What do Cao et al.'s results mean for the future of NF-κB research? An in vivo study of NF-κB in mammary involution is clearly required and will no doubt be forthcoming in the near future. Use of conditional transgenics (IKKα aa/aa and IKKβaa/aa) mutants, activated at or around the onset of involution, would help to establish the relative contribution of each of these signalling components in mammary regression. Identification of the NF-κB isoforms throughout the mammary cycle may also help to determine the phenotypic outcome and alternative upstream pathways responsible for apoptosis and/or proliferation, and may shed light on previous observations in breast cancer cells.

The present study has raised the possibility that two distinct NF-κB signalling pathways exist during mammary gland development. As one of these pathways has been identified, it now remains to be seen whether a similar approach reveals a second pathway later in the developmental cycle.

Abbreviations

IKK: 

IkB kinase

NF-κB: 

nuclear factor-kappa B

RANK: 

receptor activator of NF-κB

TNF: 

tumour necrosis factor.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge

References

  1. Cao Y, Bonizzi G, Seagroves TN, Greten FR, Johnson R, Schmidt EV, Karin M: IKKalpha provides an essential link between RANK signaling and cyclin D1 expression during mammary gland development. Cell. 2001, 107: 763-775. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00599-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clarkson RWE, Heeley J, Chapman R, Aillet F, Hay RT, Wyllie A, Watson C: NF-κB inhibits apoptosis in murine mammary epithelia. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 12737-12742. 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12737.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Geymayer S, Doppler W: Activation of NF-kappaB p50/p65 is regulated in the developing mammary gland and inhibits STAT5-mediated beta-casein gene expression. FASEB J. 2000, 14: 1159-1170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Rothwarf DM, Karin M: The NF-kappa B activation pathway: a paradigm in information transfer from membrane to nucleus. Sci STKE. 1999, 5: RE1-Google Scholar
  5. Fantl V, Stamp G, Andrews A, Rosewell I, Dickson C: Mice lacking cyclin D1 are small and show defects in eye and mammary gland development. Genes Dev. 1995, 9: 2364-2372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brantley DM, Chen CL, Muraoka RS, Bushdid PB, Bradberry JL, Kittrell F, Medina D, Matrisian LM, Kerr LD, Yull FE: Nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) regulates proliferation and branching in mouse mammary epithelium. Mol Biol Cell. 2001, 12: 1445-1455.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Franzoso G, Carlson L, Poljak L, Shores EW, Epstein S, Leonardi A, Grinberg A, Tran T, Scharton-Kersten T, Anver M, Love P, Brown K, Siebenlist U: Mice deficient in nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B/p52 present with defects in humoral responses, germinal center reactions, and splenic microarchitecture. J Exp Med. 1998, 187: 147-159. 10.1084/jem.187.2.147.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Caamano JH, Rizzo CA, Durham SK, Barton DS, Raventos-Suarez C, Snapper CM, Bravo R: Nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B2 (p100/p52) is required for normal splenic microarchitecture and B cell-mediated immune responses. J Exp Med. 1998, 187: 185-196. 10.1084/jem.187.2.185.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Senftleben U, Cao Y, Xiao G, Greten FR, Krahn G, Bonizzi G, Chen Y, Hu Y, Fong A, Sun SC, Karin M: Activation by IKKalpha of a second, evolutionary conserved, NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Science. 2001, 293: 1495-1499. 10.1126/science.1062677.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Y, Baud V, Oga T, Kim KI, Yoshida K, Karin M: IKKalpha controls formation of the epidermis independently of NF-kappaB. Nature. 2001, 410: 710-714. 10.1038/35070605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Tanaka M, Fuentes ME, Yamaguchi K, Durnin MH, Dalrymple SA, Hardy KL, Goeddel DV: Embryonic lethality, liver degeneration, and impaired NF-kappa B activation in IKK-beta-deficient mice. Immunity. 1999, 10: 421-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Smith C, Andreakos E, Crawley JB, Brennan FM, Feldmann M, Foxwell BM: NF-kappaB-inducing kinase is dispensable for activation of NF-kappaB in inflammatory settings but essential for lymphotoxin beta receptor activation of NF-kappaB in primary human fibroblasts. J Immunol. 2001, 167: 5895-5903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Song J, Sapi E, Brown W, Nilsen J, Tartaro K, Kacinski BM, Craft J, Naftolin F, Mor G: Roles of Fas and Fas ligand during mammary gland remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2000, 106: 1209-1220.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarkson RWE, Watson CJ: NF-kappaB and apoptosis in mammary epithelial cells. J Mamm Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2000, 4: 165-175. 10.1023/A:1018725207969.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Beg AA, Baltimore D: An essential role for NF-kappaB in preventing TNF-alpha-induced cell death. Science. 1996, 274: 782-784. 10.1126/science.274.5288.782.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Van Antwerp DJ, Martin SJ, Kafri T, Green DR, Verma IM: Suppression of TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis by NF-kappaB. Science. 1996, 274: 787-789. 10.1126/science.274.5288.787.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dejardin E, Bonizzi G, Bellahcene A, Castronovo V, Merville MP, Bours V: Highly-expressed p100/p52 (NFKB2) sequesters other NF-kappa B-related proteins in the cytoplasm of human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 1995, 11: 1835-1841.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakshatri H, BhatNakshatri P, Martin DA, Goulet RJ, Sledge GW: Constitutive activation of NF-kappaB during progression of breast cancer to hormone-independent growth. Mol Cell Biol. 1997, 17: 3629-3639.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Sovak MA, Bellas RE, Kim DW, Zanieski GJ, Rogers AE, Traish AM, Sonenshein GE: Aberrant nuclear factor-kappaB/Rel expression and the pathogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Invest. 1997, 100: 2952-2960.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Cogswell PC, Guttridge DC, Funkhouser WK, Baldwin AS: Selective activation of NF-kappa B subunits in human breast cancer: potential roles for NF-kappa B2/p52 and for Bcl-3. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 1123-1131. 10.1038/sj/onc/1203412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yu Q, Geng Y, Sicinski P: Specific protection against breast cancers by cyclin D1 ablation. Nature. 2001, 411: 1017-1021. 10.1038/35082500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Soler AP, Marano CW, Bryans M, Miller RD, Garulacan LA, Mauldin SK, Stamato TD, Mullin JM: Activation of NF-kappaB is necessary for the restoration of the barrier function of an epithelium undergoing TNF-alpha-induced apoptosis. Eur J Cell Biol. 1999, 78: 56-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2002