Open Access

Mutation screening of RAD51C in male breast cancer patients

  • Valentina Silvestri1,
  • Piera Rizzolo1,
  • Mario Falchetti1,
  • Ines Zanna2,
  • Giovanna Masala2,
  • Domenico Palli2 and
  • Laura Ottini1Email author
Breast Cancer Research201113:404

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2823

Published: 08 February 2011

We read with great interest the paper by Akbari and colleagues [1] in a recent issue of Breast Cancer Research. The authors reported on the absence of RAD51C mutations in 454 patients with BRCA1/2-negative familial breast cancer/ovarian cancer (BC/OC). In the initial report by Meindl and colleagues [2], RAD51C mutations were identified in 6 out of 480 patients with BRCA1/2-negative familial BC/OC. Interestingly, on the basis of histopathologic features, including intermediate grade (G2), estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), progesterone receptor-positive (PR+), and HER2-negative (HER2-) expression, RAD51C-associated BCs were found to be similar to BRCA2-associated BCs [2]. BRCA2 is known to play a significant role in male BC (MBC); however, no occurrence of MBC was observed in the six RAD51C families described [2].

To investigate the role of RAD51C in MBC, we screened for RAD51C mutations in 97 MBC patients selected from our population-based series of 126 cases because they were previously found negative for BRCA1/2, CHEK2, PALB2, and BRIP1 mutations [3, 4]. Notably, 25.8% of cases showed a positive first-degree family history of BC or OC or both. The majority of MBCs were invasive ductal carcinomas (74.5%), G2 (53.5%), ER+ (90.7%), PR+ (82.6%), or HER2- (85.4%). Overall, 66% of the MBCs showed an ER+/PR+/HER2- phenotype. All patients provided informed consent to the study. We carried out mutation screening of the nine exons and intron/exon boundaries of RAD51C by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis, a rapid closed-tube mutation scanning method with high sensitivity and specificity. Cases displaying abnormal profiles were evaluated by direct sequencing. Primers are available upon request.

We found no truncating RAD51C mutations. We identified a novel intronic variant, IVS3 c.738-16G>T, in 1 out of 97 MBCs (1%). By in silico analysis, performed with Splice Site Prediction (BDGP, Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA) and NetGene 2 Server software (CBSA, Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark), the IVS3 c.738-16G>T variant is predicted not to affect splicing. This variant was also identified in 2 out of 173 (1.2%) population controls examined. We also found a neutral polymorphic intronic variant, IVS6 c.904+34T>C (rs28363318), in 16 out of 97 (16.5%) MBCs.

Overall, our results, which are based on a relatively large MBC series, are consistent with the findings by Akbari and colleagues [1] and with data on 92 patients with hereditary gynecological cancer in which no deleterious RAD51C mutations were identified [5] and would suggest that the impact of RAD51C mutations on BC predisposition might be more limited than initially reported. In conclusion, we found no evidence that RAD51C mutations may contribute to MBC susceptibility. Further studies on larger MBC series are needed to confirm our findings.

Abbreviations

BC: 

breast cancer

ER: 

estrogen receptor

G2: 

intermediate grade

MBC: 

male breast cancer

OC: 

ovarian cancer

PR: 

progesterone receptor.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The letter was supported by a grant from Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG 8713).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome
(2)
Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute - ISPO

References

  1. Akbari MR, Tonin P, Foulkes WD, Ghadirian P, Tischkowitz M, Narod SA: RAD51C germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12: 404-10.1186/bcr2619.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Meindl A, Hellebrand H, Wiek C, Erven V, Wappenschmidt B, Niederacher D, Freund M, Lichtner P, Hartmann L, Schaal H, Ramser J, Honisch E, Kubisch C, Wichmann HE, Kast K, Deissler H, Engel C, Müller-Myhsok B, Neveling K, Kiechle M, Mathew CG, Schindler D, Schmutzler RK, Hanenberg H: Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene. Nat Genet. 2010, 42: 410-414. 10.1038/ng.569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ottini L, Rizzolo P, Zanna I, Falchetti M, Masala G, Ceccarelli K, Vezzosi V, Gulino A, Giannini G, Bianchi S, Sera F, Palli D: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and clinical-pathologic features of 108 male breast cancer cases from Tuscany: a population-based study in central Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009, 116: 577-586. 10.1007/s10549-008-0194-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Silvestri V, Rizzolo P, Falchetti M, Zanna I, Masala G, Bianchi S, Palli D, Ottini L: Mutation analysis of BRIP1 in male breast cancer cases: a population-based study in Central Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010, [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  5. Zheng Y, Zhang J, Hope K, Niu Q, Huo D, Olopade OI: Screening RAD51C nucleotide alterations in patients with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010, 124: 857-861. 10.1007/s10549-010-1095-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2011

Advertisement