Volume 10 Supplement 3

Symposium Mammographicum 2008

Open Access

Study of the availability of digital mammography for premenopausal women in the Valencian Breast Cancer Early Detection Program

  • M Ramos1,
  • R Tortosa2,
  • V Gonzalez2,
  • G Verdú1 and
  • JI Villaescusa2
Breast Cancer Research200810(Suppl 3):P66

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2064

Published: 7 July 2008

In 1992, the Valencian Breast Cancer Screening Program (VBCSP) started in the Valencian Community. To date, 24 mammography units have been installed all over the region. There is a health risk in the studied women that has to be estimated and controlled. A methodology to calculate approximately the radiological detriment in the VBCSP has been developed based on Monte Carlo techniques. As qualitative parameters in the program, the average mean glandular doses from representative sample populations undergoing screening mammography (digital or film) from each of the 24 units in operation have been obtained. The American College of Radiology Imaging Network reached the conclusion that digital mammography performed significantly better than film for premenopausal and perimenopausal women younger than 50 years old [1]. Our group uses the software SCREENRISK [2] to estimate the induction/detection rates in order to corroborate American conclusions in a European region. The obtained results confirm the American results about the application of digital mammography in premenopausal and perimenopausal women younger than 50 years old.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Chemical and Nuclear Engineering Department, Polytechnic University of Valencia
(2)
Radiation Protection Service, La Fe University Hospital

References

  1. Pisano ED, et al: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 1773-1783. 10.1056/NEJMoa052911.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ramos M, et al: Use of risk projection models to estimate mortality and incidence from radiation-induced breast cancer in screening programs. Phys Med Biol. 2005, 50: 505-520. 10.1088/0031-9155/50/3/008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2008

Advertisement