Skip to content

Advertisement

Volume 8 Supplement 2

Breast cancer research: the past and the future

  • Poster Presentation
  • Open Access

Poly(ADPribosyl)ation of CTCF: role in breast tumourigenesis

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Breast Cancer Research20068 (Suppl 2) :P7

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1562

©  BioMed Central Ltd 2006

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Breast Cancer
  • Tumour Tissue
  • Breast Tumour
  • Primary Culture
  • Breast Tissue

Background

CTCF is a conserved, ubiquitous and multifunctional 11 Zn finger (ZF) transcription factor with features of a tumour suppressor. CTCF regulates transcription in diverse modes, such as promoter activation and repression, silencing, constitutive and methylation-dependent chromatin insulation. We have previously reported that CTCF can be post-translationally regulated by poly(ADPribosyl)ation and that this modification modulates the insulator function of CTCF [1, 2]. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the role of CTCF poly(ADPribosyl)ation in normal and breast cancer cells.

Methods

The following techniques have been used in this investigation: western analysis, mass spectrometry, immunoprecipitation, cell cultures, transient transfection, primary cultures from normal and tumour tissues, cellular fractionation and laser capture microdissection.

Results

Using a large panel of breast tumours and paired peripheral tissues, we have discovered that only the poly(ADPribosyl)ated isoform of CTCF (called CTCF180) is detected in normal breast tissues, whereas the other isoform of CTCF (called CTCF130) only appears in breast tumour tissues and immortalised cell lines (see Figure 1). The identity of the poly(ADPribosyl)ated isoform of CTCF was further verified by mass spectrometry. We are currently establishing primary cultures from normal and tumour tissues in order to investigate whether the appearance of CTCF130 is linked to immortalisation. The histological type of cells containing CTCF180 and CTCF130 is being determined by cellular fractionation and laser capture microdissection of breast tissues. Finally, experiments using cell culture models suggest that the generation of the CTCF180 can be associated with cell cycle arrest.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Western blot analysis of six paired samples (1–6) of normal and tumour tissues (a representative western blot of total 56 paired samples is shown). Fifty micrograms of the total protein were used in this assay. The bands of the CTCF 180 kDa and 130 kDa isoforms were quantified and their additive values were normalized to the corresponding values of α-Tubulin used as loading control (bottom panel).

Conclusion

This research addresses the molecular mechanisms of breast tumourigenesis: CTCF180 and CTCF130 may regulate different sets of genes and/or different cell functions specific for normal and cancer cells, respectively. The loss of CTCF poly(ADPribosyl)ation could also lead to epigenetic disturbances. Our data obtained so far indicate that the transition from CTCF180 to CTCF130 could be a hallmark of tumour development. We envisage the potential use of both CTCF isoforms as biological markers for breast tumourigenesis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Breast Cancer Campaign, The Medical Research Council, and The University of Essex.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

References

  1. Yu W, Ginjala V, Pant V, Chernukhin I, Whitehead J, Docquier F, Farrar D, Tavoosidana R, Mukhopadhyay R, Kanduri C, et al: Poly(ADPribosyl)ation regulates CTCF dependent chromatin insulation. Nat Genet. 2004, 36: 1105-1110. 10.1038/ng1426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Klenova E, Ohlsson R: Poly(ADPribosyl)ation and epigenetics: is CTCF PARt of the plot?. Cell Cycle. 2005, 4: 96-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2006

Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research

ISSN: 1465-542X

Contact us