Volume 8 Supplement 2

Breast cancer research: the past and the future

Open Access

Role of BRCT motif containing proteins in Chk1 activation

  • RG Beniston1 and
  • CGW Smythe1
Breast Cancer Research20068(Suppl 2):P4

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1559

Published: 01 November 2006

Introduction

Chk1, along with Chk2, regulates processes such as DNA replication, cell cycle control, chromatin restructuring and apoptosis. DNA damage/replication stress activates Chk1 by phosphorylation from the PI3/PI4 family of kinases. Activation of Chk1 is thought to be mediated by proteins containing the BRCA1 C-terminal domain (BRCT). We previously identified a potential complex of four Chk1-associated proteins by immunoprecipitation, western blotting and mass spectrometry, one of which is BRCA1. Germline mutations in BRCA1 are responsible for many cases of hereditary breast cancer, and cells deficient in BRCA1 sustain spontaneous aberrations in chromosome structure. Such findings indicate that BRCA1 is essential for suppressing genome instability.

Method and results

Studies have concentrated on the role of BRCA1, with other BRCT-motif proteins, in the regulation of Chk1. Through immunoprecipitation assays and analysis of the phosphorylation status of Chk1, in both wildtype and mutated BRCA1 cell lines, we have shown that although BRCA1 forms a complex with Chk1, it is not essential for the activation of Chk1 in response to either stalled replication forks (induced by hydroxyurea) or double-stranded DNA breaks (induced by ionising radiation). In contrast, we have observed that the loss of both BRCA1 and the knockdown of the fission yeast rad4/Cut5 related protein Topisomerase II binding protein 1 (TopBP1) inhibit activation in response to DNA damage but not stalled replication forks (Figure 1). However, the knockdown of TopBP1 alone was insufficient to inhibit activation.
Figure 1

Loss of Topisomerase II binding protein 1 (TopBP1) and BRCA1 inhibits Chk1 activation after ionising radiation.

Conclusion

Inhibition of Chk1 activation in response to ionising radiation requires the loss of both TopBP1 and BRCA1, suggesting redundancy. In addition, as the response to hydroxyurea, or UV, was unaffected, it seems likely that different proteins are involved in Chk1 activation in response to differing stimuli. Analysis of other Chk1 binding proteins continues determining whether they are involved in Chk1 activation in response to stalled replication forks and/or double-stranded DNA breaks. As Chk1 is involved in maintaining tumor cell viability following activation of the replication checkpoint, the Chk1-regulated checkpoint(s) may protect cells from ionizing radiation-induced killing. The ability to delineate the control mechanisms of Chk1 is of critical importance in order to target Chk1 with the aim of increasing the selectivity and specificity of anticancer drug treatments.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Breast Cancer Campaign funded the project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
University of Sheffield

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2006

Advertisement