Volume 8 Supplement 1

Symposium Mammographicum 2006

Open Access

Ultrasound breast imaging versus pathology; correlation of reported benign ultrasound scans with subsequent biopsy

  • M Sinclair1
Breast Cancer Research20068(Suppl 1):P75

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1490

Published: 10 July 2006

In the absence of any suspicious mammographic findings, lesions that appear benign with ultrasound yield benign pathology [15].

This retrospective study investigated the outcome of needle biopsy of ultrasonically benign appearing masses. The sample group included patients attending a symptomatic breast clinic at a busy London teaching hospital, from 2000 to 2003. Eight hundred and seventy-two cases fulfilled the following criteria: a solid mass graded U2, and an absence of any suspicious mammographic findings (M1/M2), if mammogram performed. A definitive pathological result had been obtained from fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA) or wide-bore needle biopsy (WBN). Cases also had a follow-up period of 18 months following FNA or WBN; 872 cases fulfilled this inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated 865 cases (99.2%) were true negatives and seven cases (0.8%) were false negatives.

This revealed that there is a strong positive correlation with benign appearing breast masses seen with ultrasound and their respective pathological findings. The recommendations are to continue with further study to include all cases (not just benign). Also to develop a standardised reporting system, particularly for the training of junior staff members.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kingston University & St George's Hospital University of London, Faculty of Health and Social Care Sciences

References

  1. Graf O, Helbich TH, Fuchsjaeger MH, Hopf G, Morgun M, Graf C, Mallek R, Sickles EA: Follow-up of palpable circumscribed non-calcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?. Radiology. 2004, , [http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/full/233/3/850]Google Scholar
  2. Stavros AT: Breast Ultrasound. 2004, Lippincott Williams and WilkinsGoogle Scholar
  3. Shetty MK, Shah YP, Sharman RS: Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast. J Ultrasound Med. 2003, 22: 263-268.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dennis MA, Parker SH, Klaus AJ, Stavros AT, Kaske TI, Clarke SB: Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammo-grams and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump. Radiology. 2001, 219: 186-191.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA: Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995, 196: 123-134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central 2006

Advertisement