Open Access

Treatment of solid tumors with immunotoxins

Breast Cancer Research20057:184

https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr1284

Published: 12 July 2005

Abstract

Immunotoxins are hybrid molecules that generally consist of a toxin coupled with a tumor-specific antibody or antibody fragment that is intended to target and concentrate the toxin within the tumor tissue. The biodistribution, specificity, immunogenicity, and cytotoxic activity of the immunotoxin are but a few of the factors that govern the effectiveness of these compounds in the treatment of patients with cancer. Improvements in design, synthesis, and delivery of these molecules may permit them to become significant components in the arsenal of targeted therapies for cancer.

In this issue of Breast Cancer Research, von Minckwitz and colleagues [1] report the results of phase I study conducted in patients with advanced cancer using ScFv(FRP5)-ETA, a recombinant, single chain (sc) antibody toxin with binding specificity for HER2 [2, 3] linked to Pseudomonas exotoxin A (ETA). Although significant clinical responses were not observed, ScFv(FRP5)-ETA appeared to be well tolerated at dose levels that may prove clinically active. As such, ScFv(FRP5)-ETA joins a growing list of promising new agents in targeted therapy for solid tumors.

The notion of targeted tumor killing is has been around since early in the past century. In 1906, Ehrlich [4] introduced the concept of targeting cancer cells with a 'magic bullet', consisting of tissue-specific carriers that would deliver toxic agents to neoplastic tissue. The advent of mAbs made it possible to generate virtually unlimited amounts of antibody specific for antigens that are differentially expressed by tumor cells versus their normal cell counterparts. Although examples of truly tumor-specific antigens are rare, it is often possible to find tumor-associated antigens that are restricted in their tissue distribution or that are expressed at aberrantly high levels by tumor cells. A prime example of the latter is HER2/neu, a surface protein that is over-expressed by many types of cancers, in particular adenocarcinoma of the breast [57]. As such, HER2/neu is an attractive target for antibody-directed therapies.

In fact, the first mAb approved for the use in solid tumor therapy was Herceptin, a humanized mAb specific for HER2. It is currently used in the treatment of breast cancer as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Although remarkable objective responses were observed, only a fraction of patients experienced a complete response and/or a long-lasting response with this mAb [811]. In addition, side effects such as cardiac dysfunction have been observed, the incidence and severity of which appears to be greatest in patients receiving Herceptin in combination with anthracyclines [12].

It is conceivable that linking antibodies to HER2/neu with drugs and/or toxins might generate immunotoxins with different mechanisms of action [13, 14]. This approach may have lower toxicity because the toxic agent is anticipated to concentrate in and around the tumor, leading to higher local concentrations. Initially, antibodies were conjugated to radioisotopes. Most immunotoxins currently contain modified plant, bacteria, or fungi toxins. The two most commonly used bacterial toxins are diphtheria toxin and Pseudomonas exotoxin [15]. An advantage of this approach is that, through selective delivery of drugs to tumors, it can reduce systemic toxicity. One single immunotoxin can kill a tumor cell, whereas 105 molecules of a chemotherapeutic drug are needed to achieve the same effect [16].

Another problem that may be circumvented by immunotoxins is that of poor penetration of antibody molecules into some tumor tissues. Through the use of antibody fragments, such as the scFv used by ScFv(FRP5)-ETA, immunotoxins with sizes smaller than antibody molecules can be generated that may achieve more effective penetration of solid tumor tissue than whole antibody molecules [17, 18].

von Minckwitz and colleagues [19] previously reported that injection of ScFv(FRP5)-ETA into cutaneous nodules of tumor cells that over-express HER2/neu caused shrinkage or complete regression of the injected tumor nodules in most treated patients. To develop this into a systemic therapy, those investigators examined the toxicity of intravenous injections of ScFv(FRP5)-ETA in a phase I dose escalation study including 18 patients with advanced cancers that over-expressed HER2/neu. When administered daily as an intravenous bolus infusion over 5 days every 2 weeks, the investigators found that doses of 12.5 μg/kg were well tolerated. Peak plasma concentrations of ScFv(FRP5)-ETA in patients treated at this dose level generally were greater than 100 ng/ml – a level that apparently has activity against tumor cells in vitro.

On the other hand, 13 out of the 18 patients treated generated antibodies against ScFv(FRP5)-ETA, which in five cases apparently could neutralize the activity of this immunotoxin. Such antibodies certainly could diminish the plasma concentration of ScFv(FRP5)-ETA with repeated use. Conceivably, the generation of similar immunotoxins containing humanized antibody fragments instead of the mouse anti-HER2/neu antibody fragment could help to mitigate this problem by reducing the tendency for inducing antibodies – that could accelerate the clearance of the immunotoxin and/or inhibit its ability – to bind selectively to their intended tumor target [20].

In any case, on the surface it appears that ScFv(FRP5)-ETA is better tolerated than another Fv immunotoxin directed against HER2/neu, namely erb-38 [21]. The latter immunotoxin combines the same toxin with an anti-HER2/neu Fv via a disulphide bond. However, erb-38 had hepatoxicity apparently at lower doses in phase I testing, an effect that is not completely understood [18]. Unlike erb38, the mAb FRP5 does not bind to liver cells, minimizing the cross-reactivity with normal tissue. This could explain the relatively low toxicity of the agent [19]. However, von Minckwitz and colleagues [1] point out that even in mouse models, in which binding to endogenous HER2 on liver cells can be excluded, erb-38 is still more toxic than ScFv(FRP5)-ETA. Another possibility is that the liver toxicity caused by erb-38 could be due to different clearance in the liver, the binding stability of the toxin moiety, or the difference in the binding epitopes of the two antibodies. These differences should be further explored because a more resilient immunotoxin that lacks systemic toxicity would be very desirable. Such an agent could be administered via continuous infusion to maintain a constant plasma concentration, which might permit optimal perfusion into the tumor mass.

In conclusion, ScFv(FRP5)-ETA is an immunotoxin that is composed of a potent toxin combined with a recombinant single-chain antibody toxin with binding specificity for HER2/neu. Prior studies indicated that direct injection of this immunotoxin into subcutaneous nodules of tumor cells over-expressing HER2/neu could induce local tumor regression.

To develop ScFv(FRP5)-ETA for systemic therapy, von Minckwitz and colleagues [1] evaluated the safety of administering this immunotoxin intravenously to patients with HER2/neu over-expressing cancers. Although clinical responses were modest at best and antibodies against ScFv(FRP5)-ETA developed in most of the treated patients, the study found that ScFv(FRP5)-ETA could be administered intravenously to patients at doses that may have clinical activity without major hepatic toxicity. Although more clinical studies are necessary, it is conceivable that ScFv(FRP5)-ETA may find utility in the targeted therapy of solid tumors.

Abbreviations

ETA: 

Pseudomonas exotoxin A

mAb: 

monoclonal antibody

sc: 

single chain.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Moores Cancer Center, University of California

References

  1. von Minckwitz G, Harder S, Hövelmann S, Jäger E, Al-Batran S-E, Loibl S, Atmaca A, Cimpoiasu C, Neumann A, Abera A, et al: Phase I clinical study of the recombinant antibody toxin scFv(FRP5)-ETA specific for the ErbB2/HER2 receptor in patients with advanced solid malignomas. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: R617-R626. 10.1186/bcr1264.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Wels W, Harwerth IM, Mueller M, Groner B, Hynes NE: Selective inhibition of tumor cell growth by a recombinant single-chain antibody-toxin specific for the erbB-2 receptor. Cancer Res. 1992, 52: 6310-6317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wels W, Beerli R, Hellmann P, Schmidt M, Marte BM, Kornilova ES, Hekele A, Mendelsohn J, Groner B, Hynes NE: EGF receptor and p185erbB-2-specific single-chain antibody toxins differ in their cell-killing activity on tumor cells expressing both receptor proteins. Int J Cancer. 1995, 60: 137-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ehrlich P: The relationship between chemical constitution, distribution, and pharmacological action. The Collected Papers of Paul Ehrlich. Edited by: Himmelweit F, Marquardt M, Dale H. 1956, Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1: 596-Google Scholar
  5. Slamon DJ, Godolphin W, Jones LA, Holt JA, Wong SG, Keith DE, Levin WJ, Stuart SG, Udove J, Ullrich A, et al: Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989, 244: 707-712.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Schneider PM, Hung MC, Chiocca SM, Manning J, Zhao XY, Fang K, Roth JA: Differential expression of the c-erbB-2 gene in human small cell and non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 4968-4971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Park JB, Rhim JS, Park SC, Kimm SW, Kraus MH: Amplification, overexpression, and rearrangement of the erbB-2 protoonco-gene in primary human stomach carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1989, 49: 6605-6609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Baja-monde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, et al: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 783-792. 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, et al: Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 719-726. 10.1200/JCO.20.3.719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinoda Y, Sasaki S, Ishida T, Imai K: Monoclonal antibodies as effective therapeutic agents for solid tumors. Cancer Sci. 2004, 95: 621-625.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pegram MD, Lipton A, Hayes DF, Weber BL, Baselga JM, Tripathy D, Baly D, Baughman SA, Twaddell T, Glaspy JA, et al: Phase II study of receptor-enhanced chemosensitivity using recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2/neu monoclonal antibody plus cisplatin in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer refractory to chemotherapy treatment. J Clin Oncol. 1998, 16: 2659-2671.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Seidman A, Hudis C, Pierri MK, Shak S, Paton V, Ashby M, Murphy M, Stewart SJ, Keefe D: Cardiac dysfunction in the trastuzumab clinical trials experience. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 1215-1221. 10.1200/JCO.20.5.1215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Arnon R, Sela M: In vitro and in vivo efficacy of conjugates of daunomycin with anti-tumor antibodies. Immunol Rev. 1982, 62: 5-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wargalla UC, Reisfeld RA: Rate of internalization of an immunotoxin correlates with cytotoxic activity against human tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989, 86: 5146-5150.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Siegall CB: Targeted toxins as anticancer agents. Cancer. 1994, 74 (suppl): 1006-1012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall WA, Fodstad O: Immunotoxins and central nervous system neoplasia. J Neurosurg. 1992, 76: 1-12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pastan I: Immunotoxins containing Pseudomonas exotoxin A: a short history. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2003, 52: 338-341.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pai-Scherf LH, Villa J, Pearson D, Watson T, Liu E, Willingham MC, Pastan I: Hepatotoxicity in cancer patients receiving erb-38, a recombinant immunotoxin that targets the erbB2 receptor. Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 5: 2311-2315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Azemar M, Djahansouzi S, Jager E, Solbach C, Schmidt M, Maurer AB, Mross K, Unger C, von Minckwitz G, Dall P, et al: Regression of cutaneous tumor lesions in patients intratumorally injected with a recombinant single-chain antibody-toxin targeted to ErbB2/HER2. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003, 82: 155-164. 10.1023/B:BREA.0000004371.48757.19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Christiansen J, Rajasekaran AK: Biological impediments to monoclonal antibody-based cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004, 3: 1493-1501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Maurer-Gebhard M, Schmidt M, Azemar M, Altenschmidt U, Stocklin E, Wels W, Groner B: Systemic treatment with a recombinant erbB-2 receptor-specific tumor toxin efficiently reduces pulmonary metastases in mice injected with genetically modified carcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 1998, 58: 2661-2666.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© BioMed Central Ltd 2005

Advertisement