Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ protects ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells from palmitate toxicity
© Kourtidis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 30 August 2008
Accepted: 19 March 2009
Published: 19 March 2009
Accumulation of fatty acids and neutral lipids in nonadipose tissues is cytotoxic. We recently showed that ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells produce significantly high amounts of fats, because of overexpression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ-binding protein and the nuclear receptor NR1D1 (nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1; Rev-erbα). These genes upregulate de novo fatty acid synthesis, which is a critical pathway for the energy production and survival of these cells. NR1D1 and PPARγ-binding protein are functionally related to PPARγ, a well established positive regulator of adipogenesis and lipid storage.
The effects of GW9662 and exogenously added palmitate on breast cells (BT474, MDA-MB-361, MCF-7, and human mammary epithelial cells) in monolayer culture were assessed. Mass spectrometric quantitation of fatty acids and fluorescence-based high content microscopy assays of cell growth, apoptosis, triglyceride storage and reactive oxygen species production were used.
ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells are more sensitive to inhibition of PPARγ activity by the antagonist GW9662. PPARγ inhibition results in increased levels of total fats in the cells, mostly because of increased amounts of palmitic and stearic unsaturated acids. Administration of exogenous palmitate is lethal to ERBB2-positive but not to ERBB2-negative cells. GW9662 exacerbates the effects of palmitate addition on BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells, but it has no significant effect on MCF-7 and human mammary epithelial cells. Palmitate administration results in a fivefold to tenfold greater increase in fat stores in ERBB2-negative cells compared with ERBB2-positive cells, which suggests that the ERBB2-positive cells have maximized their ability to store fats and that additional palmitate is toxic to these cells. Both PPARγ inhibition and palmitate administration result in increased reactive oxygen species production in BT474 cells. The cell death that results from this treatment can be counteracted by the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine.
Our findings indicate that PPARγ activity enables ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells, which produce high levels of fat, to convert fatty acids to triglycerides, allowing these cells to avert the cell death that results from lipotoxicity. Endogenous palmitate toxicity represents a genetically based property of ERBB2-positive breast cancer that can be exploited for therapeutic intervention.
Amplification of the ERBB2 oncogene is one of the most clinically relevant genetic changes in breast cancer and occurs in 10% to 34% of breast cancer cases. ERBB2 overexpression is a significant predictor of both overall survival and time to relapse . The association of ERBB2 amplification with aggressive disease and poor clinical outcome in breast cancer has made ERBB2 an attractive therapeutic target. Trastuzumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeted against the extracellular domain of ERBB2, was widely hailed as the first next generation cancer therapy when it was introduced for the treatment of estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Its success has been modest. When used as single-agent therapy in patients with metastatic ERBB2-positive breast cancer, response rates ranging from 11% to 26% have been observed. Because a relatively large proportion of patients do not benefit from ERBB2-targeted therapy, it is likely that factors in addition to ERBB2 itself must influence the response of these tumors to this therapy. Recently, an RNA interference screen identified regulators of fat metabolism (including the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]γ-binding protein [PBP] and the nuclear receptor NR1D1 [nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1], a PPARγ target protein) as being relevant to the survival specifically of ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells, but not that of other breast cancer cells or normal mammary epithelial cells (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). Both genes reside on the ERBB2 amplicon and are transcriptional regulators that positively affect expression of genes such as FASN (fatty acid synthase), ACLY (ATP citrate lyase) and ACACA (acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha), which are the three major enzymes of de novo fatty acid synthesis (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). As a result, ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells contain significantly higher amounts of cellular fats, as compared with other breast cancer cell lines or normal cells, because of concomitant overexpression of NR1D1 and PBP genes (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data) .
The end product of de novo fatty acid synthesis, namely palmitate, and other saturated fatty acids like it, are toxic to cells. Palmitate has been shown to generate a variety of apoptotic signals [3, 4]. In some cases these involve the synthesis of ceramide [5, 6], whereas in others reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced [3, 7]. Studies conducted in a variety of cell types, including breast cancer cell lines [8, 9], suggest that this lipotoxicity is specific for saturated fatty acids such as palmitate. Triglyceride accumulation in nonadipose cells represents a cellular defense mechanism against lipotoxicity . Because exogenous unsaturated fatty acids have an impact on this process, it may represent a mechanism for effects of diet on cancer etiology.
Both PBP and NR1D1 are functionally related to PPARγ [11, 12]. PPARγ expression is also higher in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells . These cells were more sensitive to inhibition of PPARγ with antagonists such as GW9662 and T0070907, as compared with other types of breast cancer cells or normal mammary epithelial cells (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). PPARγ inhibition in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells resulted in cell death and apoptosis, similar to the effects of PBP and NR1D1 inhibition (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). PPARγ is a major regulator of adipogenesis and lipid homeostasis . We sought to examine the reasons for the dependence of ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells on PPARγ for survival. In this context, we identified palmitate-induced lipotoxicity as a main effect of PPARγ inhibition in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and chemicals
Breast cancer cell lines BT474, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-361 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs) were obtained from Cambrex (East Rutherford, NJ, USA). BT474 and MCF-7 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 100 U/μl penicillin-streptomycin (Cellgro, Herndon, VA, USA); BT474 medium was also supplemented with ITS (insulin, transferring and selenium; Cellgro). MDA-MB-361 were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Hyclone) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum and 100 U/μl penicillin-streptomycin. HMECs were cultured in mammary epithelial growth medium (Cambrex). The PPARγ antagonist GW9662, the fatty acid palmitate, and the ceramide synthesis inhibitor fumonisin B1 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Cell viability: proliferation assays
Cell viability after small hairpin RNA transfection or chemical treatments was assessed live cell counts after trypsinization and trypan blue staining using a hemocytometer. For high-throughput experiments, cells grown on 96-well plates were washed once with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), fixed with 2.5% formaldehyde, stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and analyzed with an In Cell Analyzer 1000 (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA) high-content imaging system; cell counts and statistics were performed using In Cell Investgator 3.4 software (GE Healthcare).
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription of 2 μg of RNA in a 20 μl reaction using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 42°C for 1 hour. PCR reactions were performed by using standard Taq polymerase (Fisher BioReagents, Fairlawn, NJ, USA) with the following primer pairs (forward and reverse, respectively): PPARγ, 5'-AGCCTCATGAAGAGCCTTCCA-3' and 5'-ACCCTTGCATCCTTCACAAGC-3'; fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4; aP2), 5'-GCATGGCCAAACCTAACATGAT-3' and 5'-CCTGGCCCAGTATGAAGGAAA-3'; hormone sensitive lipase (HSL), 5'-TACAAACGCAACGAGACAGGC-3' and 5'-TGTGATCCGCTCAAACTCAGC-3'; adipose tryglyceride lipase (ATGL), 5'-AGCTCATCCAGGCCAATGTCT-3' and 5'-GGTTGTCTGAAATGCCACCAT-3'; carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 (CPT-1), 5'-TCACATTCAGGCAGCAAGAGC-3' and 5'-AATCGTGGATCCCAAAAGACG-3'; and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), 5'-GCAAATTCCATGGCACCGT-3' and 5'-TCGCCCCACTTGATTTTGG-3'.
After the initial denaturation step (95°C for 3 minutes), PCR reactions consisted of 30 to 35 cycles of a 95°C step (15 seconds), a 52 to 55°C step (15 seconds), and a 72°C step (20 seconds), followed by a final elongation step at 72°C (5 minutes). PCR products were separated on 2% agarose-ethidium bromide gels. For quantitative determination of PCR product, a real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on an ABI PRISM 7900 HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Primer pairs were the same as those used in regular RT-PCR. PCR reactions consisted of an initial incubation at 95°C (2.5 minutes) and 40 cycles of a 95°C step (15 seconds) and a 60°C step (60 seconds). Product levels were calculated after normalization with GAPDH or β-actin controls.
Immunofluoresence was performed on cells grown and treated either in 96-well plates or on cover slips in 24-well plates. In all cases, cells were fixed after treatment with 2.5% formaldehyde, washed with 1× PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100 (Fisher Chemicals, Fairlawn, NJ, USA), blocked with 3% normal goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich), incubated with a 1:50 to 1:200 dilution of the primary antibody, washed with 1× PBS, incubated with a 1:800 dilution of the secondary antibody, washed again with 1× PBS, and finally stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen). Cells stained on 96-well plates were imaged using the In Cell Analyzer 1000 (GE Healthcare) and signal measurements and statistics were performed by the In Cell Investigator 3.4 software (GE Healthcare). Cells immunostained on cover slips were imaged by using a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope system (Leica Microsystems Inc., Bannockburn, IL, USA). Antibodies used were anti-activated Bax (6A7; BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (#A-11011; Invitrogen).
For detection of neutral fat stores, cells were grown on 96-well plates, fixed with 2.5% formaldehyde, washed with 1× PBS, stained with 10 μg/ml 4,4-difluoro-1,3,5,7,8-pentamethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY 493/503; Molecular Probes), and counter-stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes) for nuclei identification. Cells were imaged using the In Cell Analyzer 1000 and pictures were analyzed using the In Cell Investigator 3.4 software.
For fatty acid detection and quantification, total cellular lipids were extracted in accordance with a procedure described previously . Briefly, approximately 107 cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 3 ml chloroform:methanol (1:2) weight/0.05% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) to extract lipids. To monitor the recovery of fatty acids, 100 μg of heptadecanoic acid was added to each sample, before lipid extraction. Samples were centrifuged to remove cellular debris and chloroform and distilled water was added to form a biphasic solution. The two phases were separated by centrifugation and organic phases were transferred to a new tube and dried under nitrogen gas. Fats were then re-suspended in 250 μl toluene + 500 μl 1% sulfuric acid in methanol and incubated at 50°C overnight under nitrogen gas, followed by two steps of 1.25 ml 5% NaCl – 1.25 ml hexane extraction. Hexane extractions were combined, washed with 1.0 ml 2% NaHCO3, run through Na2SO4 columns, and dried under nitrogen gas. The fatty acid methyl esters were re-suspended in 1.0 ml methyl acetate and were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry using an Agilent 6890 series gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a 5873 mass-selective detector. Part of the extraction was used for quantification of total and individual fatty acids under mass spectrometry and part for thin layer chromatography separation of triglycerides by a toluene-based system.
Reactive oxygen species assay
O2- generation was measured by using hydroethidine (Molecular Probes-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Cells were incubated with a final concentration of 10 μmol/l of the dye for 30 minutes, and then fixed with 2.5% formaldehyde, stained with Hoechst 33342 and imaged with an In Cell Analyzer 1000. The hydroethidine signal was quantified using the In Cell Investigator 3.4 software.
The Student's two-tailed t-test was employed for the calculation of P values.
PPARγ inhibition results in increased levels of fats
To investigate the cause of the nearly steady levels of stored fats, the message levels of PPARγ target genes related to triglyceride degradation were examined. The major target of PPARγ, namely fatty acid binding protein aP2 , was downregulated upon PPARγ inhibition, indicating that GW9662 effectively blocks PPARγ transcriptional activity (Figure 1d). Interestingly, PPARγ mRNA itself was downregulated by the GW9662 antagonist (Figure 1d). The two major lipases involved in the breakdown of triglycerides, HSL and ATGL, were downregulated upon use of GW9662 (Figure 1d), as expected [17, 18]. It has been shown that HSL, in order to effectively continue triglyceride degradation, interacts with aP2, which binds and removes fatty acids from lipid droplets . Therefore, the increase in triglyceride levels after downregulation of aP2 and HSL, as well as ATGL, is consistent with attenuation of lipolysis. Furthermore, mRNA levels of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1, the key enzyme in fatty acid β-oxidation, were not affected by GW9662 treatment, showing that fatty acid degradation was not induced after PPARγ inhibition (Figure 1d). Taken together, these findings provide clues for the observed lack of triglyceride degradation after PPARγ inhibition.
In order to examine levels of individual fatty acids, we examined the fat content of the BT474 and MCF-7 cells by mass spectrometry. The results showed that that the higher fat levels after PPARγ inhibition at sublethal concentrations of GW9662 (10 μmol/l) were primarily due to increased amounts of the saturated palmitic and stearic fatty acids (increases of 1.7 and 1.6 nmol/100,00 cells, respectively; P < 0.05; Figure 1e). These two fatty acids, together with the unsaturated palmitoleic and oleic acids, comprised almost 80% of the total amount of fats in the cells examined, with palmitate content reaching about 30% (Figure 1b,e). The increase in palmitic and stearic acids was also higher by 0.9 and 1.2 nmol/100,000 cells, respectively, in BT474 cells compared with MCF-7 cells (Figure 1e). Therefore, inhibition of PPARγ leads to increased levels of fats, mainly due to the increased production of palmitate.
Exogenous administration of palmitate is toxic specifically for ERBB2-positive cells
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ inhibition and palmitate administration in ERBB2-positive cells result in reactive oxygen species production
ERBB2-positive cells possess significantly higher amounts of tryglyceride stores than do other cell types (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data; Figure 1b–e). It has been shown that PBP and NR1D1 promote adipogenesis, and therefore fat storage, because of their functional relationship with PPARγ (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data) [11, 12]. PPARγ activity is necessary for the viability specifically of ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells, in a similar manner to PBP and NR1D1 (Kourtidis A, unpublished data; Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; Figure 1a). Our findings indicate that apoptosis due to PPARγ inhibition is consistent with endogenous palmitate toxicity. PPARγ enables ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells to convert fatty acids to triglycerides in order to avert lipotoxicity caused by the significantly high levels of fats that these cells produce. The decreased ability of BT474 and MDA-MB-361 cells to accumulate more fats after exogenous supplementation of palmitate (Figure 2b,d) is in agreement with the idea that these cells have near toxic levels of endogenously produced palmitate. Exogenous palmitate that has no effects on MCF-7 cell or HMEC viability is lethal to the ERBB2-positive cells. These results underscore the importance of triglyceride accumulation as a cellular defense against lipotoxicity  in cells that have abnormally high levels of fatty acid synthesis activity.
It has been established that cancer cells depend on an altered cellular physiology. As an example, cancer cells favor aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation for energy production, a phenomenon described by Warburg several decades ago . Fatty acid synthesis has been proposed to facilitate this mode of energy production in several cancer cells [21, 22]. Over-expression of PBP and NR1D1 in ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells causes these cells to store fatty acids at 10 times the level of other breast cancer cells (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data) . These two genes act coordinately to upregulate de novo fatty acid synthesis, enabling ERBB2-positive cells to regenerate their NAD+ by consuming nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) that is necessary for fatty acid synthesis. As a result, the cells can continue to catabolize glucose and maintain their metabolic balance (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). ERBB2 has been also shown to have a positive bidirectional relationship with FASN, in this way influencing de novo fatty acid synthesis . The tight genetic linkage between PBP, NR1D1, and ERBB2 on the 17q12-21 amplicon commonly found in breast cancers  suggests that ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells are genetically preprogrammed to depend on fatty acid synthesis for energy production.
The generation of ROS and the biosynthesis of ceramide have been proposed as possible mechanisms of lipotoxicity . Increased ROS production in BT474 cells following PPARγ inhibition, along with cell rescue after treatment with antioxidants, support the notion that ROS production is the mediator of palmitate toxicity in BT474 cells. However, inhibition of ceramide synthesis under the same conditions resulted in only a 27% increase in BT474 cell viability, showing that palmitate toxicity is mainly independent of ceramide production.
Several studies have shown that supplementation of saturated rather than unsaturated fatty acids is toxic to cells . When ERBB2-negative breast cancer cells like MDA-MB-231 were involved, only palmitate, but not oleate, was shown to induce apoptosis . It has been proposed that this is because unsaturated fats are more efficiently metabolized into triglycerides  and that they can rescue cells from lipotoxicity by channeling saturated fats like palmitate to triglyceride stores. Nevertheless, a number of reports have indicated that the Mediterranean diet, which is rich in the unsaturated oleate-containing olive oil, has anti-oncogenic properties against ERBB2-positive breast cancer [27, 28]. Similar effects were seen for other unsaturated fatty acids, like the omega-3 polyunsaturated docosahexaenoic acid  and the omega-6 polyunsaturated γ-linolenic acid . PPARγ inhibition in BT474 cells resulted in higher levels mainly of saturated rather than unsaturated fats (Figure 1d,e), and we confirmed that the saturated fatty acid palmitate is specifically toxic to these cells. However, the unsaturated oleate was also increased by PPARγ inhibition (Figure 1e), and we observed that oleate treatment produced similar toxic effects on BT474 cells (data not shown). This indicates that it is not the type of fatty acid that is responsible for the toxicity in these cells, but rather the overall high levels of fats caused by the significantly upregulated de novo fatty acid synthesis. ERBB2-positive cells have maximized their ability to store fats, and therefore additional supplementation of fatty acids, or interruption of their ability to store them by PPARγ inhibition, is lethal to these cells.
Excess of palmitate in ERBB2-positive cells could also feedback to inhibit fatty acid synthesis. It has been shown that high-fat diet downregulates both FASN and malic enzyme 1 . Both enzymes are necessary for de novo fatty acid synthesis, because FASN is the enzyme that catalyzes palmitate synthesis from acyl-coenzyme A and malonyl-coenzyme A using NADPH, whereas malic enzyme 1 supplies FASN with NADPH. ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells are sensitive to inhibition of both FASN and malic enzyme 1 genes (Kourtidis A, Carkner RD, Eifert C, Brosnan MJ, Conklin DS; unpublished data). In this case, PPARγ activity is not only important for detoxifiying the cells but also for securing palmitate into fat stores, in order for FASN and malic enzyme 1 to continue to function. Further examination is needed to confirm this hypothesis and establish this feedback loop, which could provide several missing links in the regulation of this metabolic process and, therefore, further ways to eradicate this particularly aggressive form of cancer.
The genetic linkage between NR1D1, PBP, and ERBB2 causes co-overexpression of these gene products such that ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells are preprogrammed to depend on fatty acid synthesis for energy production and survival. This study shows that the adipogenic transcription factor PPARγ is critical for ERBB2-positive breast cancer cells to convert the high levels of fatty acids that they produce into triglycerides, allowing them to avert the cell death that results from lipotoxicity. The decreased ability of ERBB2-positive cells to accumulate fats after exogenous supplementation of palmitate supports the notion that these cells have near toxic levels of endogenously produced palmitate. Increasing palmitate levels by inhibiting PPARγ or through the direct administration of palmitate results in cell death. Endogenous palmitate toxicity represents a genetically based property of ERBB2-positive breast cancer that can be exploited for therapeutic intervention.
adipose tryglyceride lipase
fatty acid synthase
fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4)
human mammary epithelial cell
hormone sensitive lipase
nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 1
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ-binding protein
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
reactive oxygen species
reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.
The authors would like to thank Drs Concetta DiRusso and Joyce Diwan for helpful suggestions. Supported by grants from the Dominic Ferraioli Foundation and the US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity W8IWXH-04-1-0474 to DSC.
- Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL: Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987, 235: 177-182. 10.1126/science.3798106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertucci F, Borie N, Ginestier C, Groulet A, Charafe-Jauffret E, Adelaide J, Geneix J, Bachelart L, Finetti P, Koki A, Hermitte F, Hassoun J, Debono S, Viens P, Fert V, Jacquemier J, Birnbaum D: Identification and validation of an ERBB2 gene expression signature in breast cancers. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 2564-2575. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaffer JE: Lipotoxicity: when tissues overeat. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2003, 14: 281-287. 10.1097/00041433-200306000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Listenberger LL, Schaffer JE: Mechanisms of lipoapoptosis: implications for human heart disease. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002, 12: 134-138. 10.1016/S1050-1738(02)00152-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimabukuro M, Higa M, Zhou YT, Wang MY, Newgard CB, Unger RH: Lipoapoptosis in beta-cells of obese prediabetic fa/fa rats. Role of serine palmitoyltransferase overexpression. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 32487-32490. 10.1074/jbc.273.49.32487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu ZH, Mu YM, Wang BA, Li XL, Lu JM, Li JY, Pan CY, Yanase T, Nawata H: Saturated free fatty acids, palmitic acid and stearic acid, induce apoptosis by stimulation of ceramide generation in rat testicular Leydig cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003, 303: 1002-1007. 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00449-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Listenberger LL, Ory DS, Schaffer JE: Palmitate-induced apoptosis can occur through a ceramide-independent pathway. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 14890-14895. 10.1074/jbc.M010286200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy S, El-Assaad W, Przybytkowski E, Joly E, Prentki M, Langelier Y: Saturated fatty acid-induced apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. A role for cardiolipin. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 31861-31870. 10.1074/jbc.M300190200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy S, Langelier Y, Prentki M: Oleate activates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and promotes proliferation and reduces apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, whereas palmitate has opposite effects. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 6353-6358.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Listenberger LL, Han X, Lewis SE, Cases S, Farese RV, Ory DS, Schaffer JE: Triglyceride accumulation protects against fatty acid-induced lipotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 3077-3082. 10.1073/pnas.0630588100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Y, Qi C, Jain S, Rao MS, Reddy JK: Isolation and characterization of PBP, a protein that interacts with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997, 272: 25500-25506. 10.1074/jbc.272.41.25500.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fontaine C, Dubois G, Duguay Y, Helledie T, Vu-Dac N, Gervois P, Soncin F, Mandrup S, Fruchart JC, Fruchart-Najib J, Staels B: The orphan nuclear receptor Rev-Erbalpha is a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARgamma) target gene and promotes PPARgamma-induced adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 37672-37680. 10.1074/jbc.M304664200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Elstner E, Williamson EA, Zang C, Fritz J, Heber D, Fenner M, Possinger K, Koeffler HP: Novel therapeutic approach: ligands for PPARgamma and retinoid receptors induce apoptosis in bcl-2-positive human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002, 74: 155-165. 10.1023/A:1016114026769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lowell BB: PPARgamma: an essential regulator of adipogenesis and modulator of fat cell function. Cell. 1999, 99: 239-242. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81654-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH: A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957, 226: 497-509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perera RJ, Marcusson EG, Koo S, Kang X, Kim Y, White N, Dean NM: Identification of novel PPARgamma target genes in primary human adipocytes. Gene. 2006, 369: 90-99. 10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yajima H, Kobayashi Y, Kanaya T, Horino Y: Identification of peroxisome-proliferator responsive element in the mouse HSL gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 352: 526-531. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.054.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kershaw EE, Schupp M, Guan HP, Gardner NP, Lazar MA, Flier JS: PPARgamma regulates adipose triglyceride lipase in adipocytes in vitro and in vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007, 293: E1736-E1745. 10.1152/ajpendo.00122.2007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yeaman SJ: Hormone-sensitive lipase – new roles for an old enzyme. Biochem J. 2004, 379: 11-22. 10.1042/BJ20031811.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kim JW, Dang CV: Cancer's molecular sweet tooth and the Warburg effect. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 8927-8930. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Colomer R, Lupu R: Why does tumor-associated fatty acid synthase (oncogenic antigen-519) ignore dietary fatty acids?. Med Hypotheses. 2005, 64: 342-349. 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.07.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Lupu R: Fatty acid synthase and the lipogenic phenotype in cancer pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 763-777. 10.1038/nrc2222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Vellon L, Mehmi I, Oza BP, Ropero S, Colomer R, Lupu R: Inhibition of fatty acid synthase (FAS) suppresses HER2/neu (erbB-2) oncogene overexpression in cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 10715-10720. 10.1073/pnas.0403390101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chin K, DeVries S, Fridlyand J, Spellman PT, Roydasgupta R, Kuo WL, Lapuk A, Neve RM, Qian Z, Ryder T, Chen F, Feiler H, Tokuyasu T, Kingsley C, Dairkee S, Meng Z, Chew K, Pinkel D, Jain A, Ljung BM, Esserman L, Albertson DG, Waldman FM, Gray JW: Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. Cancer Cell. 2006, 10: 529-541. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Vries JE, Vork MM, Roemen TH, de Jong YF, Cleutjens JP, Vusse van der GJ, van Bilsen M: Saturated but not mono-unsaturated fatty acids induce apoptotic cell death in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes. J Lipid Res. 1997, 38: 1384-1394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cnop M, Hannaert JC, Hoorens A, Eizirik DL, Pipeleers DG: Inverse relationship between cytotoxicity of free fatty acids in pancreatic islet cells and cellular triglyceride accumulation. Diabetes. 2001, 50: 1771-1777. 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Lupu R: Mediterranean dietary traditions for the molecular treatment of human cancer: anti-oncogenic actions of the main olive oil's monounsaturated fatty acid oleic acid (18:1n-9). Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2006, 7: 495-502. 10.2174/138920106779116900.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Papadimitropoulou A, Vellon L, Lupu R: A genomic explanation connecting 'Mediterranean diet', olive oil and cancer: oleic acid, the main monounsaturated fatty acid of olive oil, induces formation of inhibitory 'PEA3 transcription factor-PEA3 DNA binding site' complexes at the Her-2/neu (erbB-2) oncogene promoter in breast, ovarian and stomach cancer cells. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42: 2425-2432. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.10.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Lupu R, Colomer R: Exogenous supplementation with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3) synergistically enhances taxane cytotoxicity and downregulates Her-2/neu (c-erbB-2) oncogene expression in human breast cancer cells. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005, 14: 263-270. 10.1097/00008469-200506000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menendez JA, Vellon L, Colomer R, Lupu R: Effect of gamma-linolenic acid on the transcriptional activity of the Her-2/neu (erbB-2) oncogene. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005, 97: 1611-1615.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Desvergne B, Wahli W: Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev. 1999, 20: 649-688. 10.1210/er.20.5.649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.