Skip to main content

Table 3 MRI-based tumor shrinkage patterns association with pCR according to different molecular subtypes in the primary analysis cohort

From: MRI-based tumor shrinkage patterns after early neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer: correlation with molecular subtypes and pathological response after therapy

Shrinkage pattern

HR+/HER2−

HER2+

TNBC

N (151)

pCR (n = 15)

Non-pCR (n = 136)

p

N (123)

pCR (n = 68)

Non-pCR (n = 55)

p

N (71)

pCR (n = 30)

Non-pCR (n = 41)

p

CS

78 (52%)

4 (27%)

74 (54%)

0.167

67 (54%)

40 (59%)

27 (49%)

0.167

45 (63%)

25 (83%)

20 (49%)

NA

 CS to small foci

1 (0.7%)

1 (6.7%)

0 (0%)

(CS vs. DIO)

9 (7.3%)

9 (13%)

0 (0%)

(CS vs. DIO)

3 (4.2%)

3 (10%)

0 (0%)

(CS vs. DIO)

 Simple CS

74 (49%)

3 (20%)

71 (52%)

0.050

50 (41%)

27 (40%)

23 (42%)

 < 0.001a

40 (56%)

21 (70%)

19 (46%)

 < 0.001a

 CS plus decreased enhancement

3 (2.0%)

0 (0%)

3 (2.2%)

(CS vs. SD)

8 (6.5%)

4 (5.9%)

4 (7.3%)

(CS vs. SD)

2 (2.8%)

1 (3.3%)

1 (2.4%)

(CS vs. SD)

DD

29 (19%)

11 (73%)

18 (13%)

 < 0.001 a

41 (33%)

25 (37%)

16 (29%)

0.167

13 (18%)

5 (17%)

8 (20%)

0.059

 CS with surrounding lesions

7 (4.6%)

3 (20%)

4 (2.9%)

(DD vs. CS)

9 (7.3%)

4 (5.9%)

5 (9.1%)

(DD vs. CS)

5 (7.0%)

2 (6.7%)

3 (7.3%)

(DD vs. CS)

 Residual multinodular lesions

22 (15%)

8 (53%)

14 (10%)

 < 0.001 a

(DD vs. SD)

32 (26%)

21 (31%)

11 (20%)

 < 0.001a

(DD vs. SD)

8 (11%)

3 (10%)

5 (12%)

0.007a

(DD vs. SD)

DIO

3 (2.0%)

0 (0%)

3 (2.2%)

0.089

(DD vs. DIO)

3 (2.4%)

2 (2.9%)

1 (1.8%)

0.167

(DD vs. DIO)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

0 (0%)

NA

(DD vs. DIO)

SD

41 (27%)

0 (0%)

41 (30%)

NA

(SD vs. DIO)

12 (10%)

1 (1.5%)

11 (20%)

0.014

(SD vs. DIO)

13 (18%)

0 (0%)

13 (32%)

NA

(SD vs. DIO)

  1. pCR pathologic complete response, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, TNBC triple-negative breast cancer, HR hormone receptor, CS concentric shrinkage, DD diffuse decrease, DIO decrease of intensity only, SD stable disease, NA not applicable
  2. aFollowing adjustment for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni’s correction, the statistically significant p values were annotated (p < 0.00833)