Skip to main content

Table 2 Poisson regression models predicting the number of mammography facilities and units by census tract measures in Delaware and by county. Estimates may be interpreted as relative risks with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Bold font denotes statistical significance

From: A catchment and location-allocation analysis of mammography access in Delaware, US: implications for disparities in geographic access to breast cancer screening

Measure

Delaware

New Castle County

Kent & Sussex Counties

Number of facilities

Number of units

Number of facilities

Number of units

Number of facilities

Number of units

Deprivationa

1.16 (0.63, 2.07)

1.12 (0.66, 1.85)

1.34 (0.51, 3.10)

1.27 (0.56, 2.60)

0.64 (0.18, 2.29)

0.44 (0.14, 1.33)

N. women 40–49b

2.08 (1.25, 3.61)

2.30 (1.45, 3.78)

3.37 (1.48, 8.24)

5.63 (2.59, 13.3)

1.87 (0.91, 4.41)

1.94 (1.01, 4.19)

N. women 50–74b

0.72 (0.36, 1.36)

0.59 (0.32, 1.05)

0.41 (0.15, 1.06)

0.25 (0.10, 0.58)

0.88 (0.24, 2.67)

0.70 (0.22, 1.89)

N. women > 74b

1.01 (0.64, 1.53)

1.10 (0.75, 1.58)

1.23 (0.69, 2.09)

1.32 (0.81, 2.11)

0.93 (0.37, 2.01)

1.17 (0.57, 2.29)

Percent Black

womenb

0.35 (0.14, 0.77)

0.32 (0.15, 0.62)

0.21 (0.05, 0.74)

0.11 (0.03, 0.38)

0.54 (0.15, 1.50)

0.61 (0.22, 1.40)

Percent w/vehiclesb

0.42 (0.22, 0.82)

0.43 (0.25, 0.77)

0.38 (0.12, 1.41)

0.35 (0.11, 1.36)

0.47 (0.21, 0.98)

0.47 (0.24, 0.86)

N. bus stopsb

1.63 (1.20, 2.17)

2.08 (1.67, 2.59)

1.47 (0.94, 2.17)

2.24 (1.67, 3.04)

1.96 (1.04, 3.86)

2.18 (1.28, 3.93)

  1. aOperationalized as a Z-score composite of census tract indicators for education, employment, income and poverty, and household composition
  2. bCentered and scaled for modeling