Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline patient characteristics

From: Ten-year distant-recurrence risk prediction in breast cancer by CanAssist Breast (CAB) in Dutch sub-cohort of the randomized TEAM trial

 

Exemestane Arm (N = 221)

Sequential Arm (N = 212)

Total (N = 433)

Dutch population in TEAM trial analysis (N = 2754)a

P value (current study vs. Dutch population in the TEAM trial)b

Age

 Median [Min, Max]

65.0 [46.0, 85.0]

64.5 [46.0, 90.0]

65.0 [46.0, 90.0]

64.0 [38.0, 96.0]

0.694

Tumor stage

 pT1

100 (45.2%)

94 (44.3%)

194 (44.8%)

1236 (44.9%)

0.423

 pT2

112 (50.7%)

110 (51.9%)

222 (51.3%)

1329 (48.3%)

 

 pT3

5 (2.3%)

3 (1.4%)

8 (1.8%)

120 (4.4%)

 

 pT4

4 (1.8%)

5 (2.4%)

9 (2.1%)

63 (2.3%)

 

Lymph node stage

 pN0

71 (32.1%)

66 (31.1%)

137 (31.6%)

832 (30.2%)

0.085

 pN1

139 (62.9%)

128 (60.3%)

267 (61.7%)

1454 (52.8%)

 

 pN2

11 (5.0%)

18 (8.5%)

29 (6.7%)

327 (11.9%)

 

TNM stage

 I

30 (13.6%)

22 (10.4%)

52 (12.0%)

354 (12.9%)

0.208

 IIA

102 (46.2%)

105 (49.5%)

207 (47.8%)

1183 (43.0%)

 

 IIB

74 (33.5%)

63 (29.7%)

137 (31.6%)

661 (24.0%)

 

 IIIA

11 (5.0%)

17 (8.0%)

28 (6.5%)

352 (12.8%)

 

 IIIB

4 (1.8%)

5 (2.4%)

9 (2.1%)

53 (1.9%)

 

Histological grade

 G1

40 (18.1%)

49 (23.1%)

89 (20.6%)

420 (15.3%)

< 0.001

 G2

117 (52.9%)

115 (54.2%)

232 (53.6%)

1219 (44.3%)

 

 G3

64 (29.0%)

48 (22.6%)

112 (25.9%)

934 (33.9%)

 

Estrogen receptor (ER)

 Positive

219 (99.1%)

209 (98.6%)

428 (98.8%)

2700 (98.0%)

0.335

 Negative

2 (0.9%)

3 (1.4%)

5 (1.2%)

53 (1.9%)

 

Progesterone receptor (PR)

 Positive

185 (83.7%)

176 (83.0%)

361 (83.4%)

1999 (72.6%)

< 0.001

 Negative

35 (15.8%)

31 (14.6%)

66 (15.2%)

601 (21.8%)

 

 Not determined

1 (0.5%)

5 (2.4%)

6 (1.4%)

153 (5.6%)

 

Chemotherapy received

 Yes

44 (19.9%)

46 (21.7%)

90 (20.8%)

812 (29.5%)

< 0.001

 No

177 (80.1%)

166 (78.3%)

343 (79.2%)

1942 (70.5%)

 
  1. a For the tumor stage in the total Dutch population, there was one case classified as T0 or T in situ, not shown but calculated in this table. There were another five cases classified as Tx or unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. For the lymph node stage in the total Dutch population, 132 cases included N3, one case unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. For the TNM stage in the total Dutch population, there were 136 cases classified as IIIC or IV stage, 15 cases unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. For grade in the total Dutch population, there were 181 cases classified as grade unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. For ER in the total Dutch population, there was one case classified as unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. For PR in the total Dutch population, there was one case classified as unknown, not shown but calculated in this table. b For continuous variables with normal distribution, a t-test was performed. Chi-squared test was performed when comparing categories. For the trend in proportion, the Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed