Skip to main content

Table 5 Analytical models used for breast cancer risk with breast texture features in addition to mammographic breast density for 5 studies using the contralateral breast (sorted by year)

From: Studies of parenchymal texture added to mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review of the methods used in the literature

References

Non-mammogram covariates included (e.g., age, parity, etc.)

Established confounders for density adjusted for

Prediction horizon (< 5 year/5 year/10 year)

AUC (baseline model)

Overall AUC (with texture features added)

Ali et al. [26]

Age, BMI, density, HRT status, parity, age at first birth

Age, BMI, HRT use, and menopausal status

NR

0.687 for apparent, 0.634 for honest

0.703 for apparent, 0.643 for honest

Wang et al. [45]

Adjusted for age, BMI

Age, BMI, HRT use, and menopausal status

NR

mC = 0.57

mC = 0.58

Perez-Benito [39]

Percent density

Age

NR

0.560

0.614

Pertuz et al. [52, 63]

None and with age, percent density

Age

NR

Density only = 0.609

0.786

Tan et al. [44]

None, with age only, and with age and BMI

Age and BMI

NR

Density = 0.52

0.68

  1. AUC area under the curve, BMI body mass index, HRT hormone replacement therapy, mC matched concordance index, NR not reported