Volume 13 Supplement 1
Preoperative estimation of the prognosis of invasive breast cancer, based on ultrasound size, core biopsy grade and percutaneous axillary lymph node biopsy
© Elseedawy et al. 2011
Published: 4 November 2011
Assessment of the prognosis of invasive breast cancer prior to surgical resection may influence patient management. The aim of this study was to calculate the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) from preoperative information and compare this with the NPI generated by the surgical pathology findings.
The preoperative Nottingham Prognostic Index (PNPI) was calculated in 46 consecutive women undergoing primary surgery for invasive breast cancer. The parameters used were imaging size (normally by ultrasound), tumour grade on core biopsy, and axillary lymph node assessment including core biopsy where appropriate. Values were divided into good (<3.41), moderate 1 (3.41 to 4.4), moderate 2 (4.41 to 5.4) and poor (>5.4) prognostic groups. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to compare the PNPI with the postoperative NPI.
Comparison of the PNPI and NPI gave an ICC of 0.68 (95% CI = 0.48 to 0.81), indicating fair to good agreement. In 39 of 46 women (85%), the PNPI was within one point of the NPI and in 34 (74%) it was within 0.5. Thirty women (65%) were assigned to the correct NPI group by the PNPI. Twelve (26%) were assigned to the adjacent NPI group. In 14 women the NPI group was worse than the PNPI, and in two it was better because the tumours were downgraded at postoperative pathology.
Preoperative estimation of the NPI approximates to the definitive NPI in the majority of women studied, and could therefore be used to guide systemic treatment decisions preoperatively.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.