Skip to main content

Arbitration cancers: analysis from two screening rounds for the Coventry, Solihull and Warwickshire screening service

Introduction

Third-reader screen-reading is undertaken in our unit to reconcile discordant reader results. An audit has been conducted to analyse the nature of cancers diagnosed at assessment for arbitration recalls. The objective was to identify and describe discordant cancer types and appearances.

Methods

The study period covered two screening rounds. Arbitration records were reviewed and mammographic shape, size, position, cancer type and grade, and histological size were recorded. Both film and digital cases were included and compared. Descriptive statistics were produced comparing discordant and concordant cancers.

Results

A total of 128 arbitration cancers were analysed (3.6% of total cancers, n = 3,516). There were 5,635 total arbitrations of which 27% (n = 1,519) were assessed. A total of 8.4% were cancer. There were a higher number of smaller sized (1 to 15 mm) cancers in the arbitrated group, 61% compared with 48% in the concordant group. There was no difference between film and digital cancer size. More cancers appeared as lobular, tubular and DCIS in the arbitration group. There was an equal spread of calcification and mass type mammographic appearances.

Conclusion

No previous study had specifically analysed arbitration (third-reader) cancers. This audit showed that lesion size is smaller, all cancer types are present and both calcifications and masses are equally represented. Digital cases did not show any smaller cancers for the discordant group. A future audit will be to look at the arbitration interval cancers; that is, when two readers have not recalled a subsequent false positive case, to assess the features that have been ignored.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Garnett.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garnett, S. Arbitration cancers: analysis from two screening rounds for the Coventry, Solihull and Warwickshire screening service. Breast Cancer Res 13, P12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr2964

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cancer Type
  • Interval Cancer
  • Mass Type
  • False Positive Case
  • Screening Service
\