ER and PR signaling nodes during mammary gland development
© BioMed Central Ltd 2012
Published: 19 July 2012
The ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone orchestrate postnatal mammary gland development and are implicated in breast cancer. Most of our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) signaling stems from in vitro studies with hormone receptor-positive cell lines. They have shown that ER and PR regulate gene transcription either by binding to DNA response elements directly or via other transcription factors and recruiting co-regulators. In addition they cross-talk with other signaling pathways through nongenomic mechanisms. Mouse genetics combined with tissue recombination techniques have provided insights about the action of these two hormones in vivo. It has emerged that hormones act on a subset of mammary epithelial cells and relegate biological functions to paracrine factors. With regards to hormonal signaling in breast carcinomas, global gene expression analyses have led to the identification of gene expression signatures that are characteristic of ERα-positive tumors that have stipulated functional studies of hitherto poorly understood transcription factors. Here, we highlight what has been learned about ER and PR signaling nodes in these different systems and attempt to lay out in which way the insights may converge.
The ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone play pre-eminent roles in the female reproductive system and orchestrate postnatal mammary gland development in conjunction with pituitary hormones and other factors . Both estrogen and progesterone can interact with membrane receptors [2, 3]. Yet most of their known biological functions are mediated by their binding to and activation of the ligand-dependent transcription factors, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR).
ER and PR are members of the nuclear hormone receptor (HR) superfamily; they contain structurally conserved and functionally distinct domains that include a central DNA binding domain, a ligand binding domain close to the COOH terminus, variable NH2-terminal domains related to transcriptional activation/repression and the well-characterized transcriptional activation domains AF-1 and AF-2 . Specifically, AF-1 is an NH2-terminal ligand-independent transcriptional activator whereas AF-2 is a ligand-dependent activation domain located in the ligand binding domain, which regulates transcription by association with transcriptional co-regulators [4–6]. There are two ERs (ERα and ERβ) encoded by distinct genes on different chromosomes and two known isoforms of PR (PRA and PRB) transcribed from the alternate usage of different promoters from the same gene .
The breast epithelium consists of basal cells, mostly myoepithelial, and luminal cells. ERα and PR are expressed in about 30% of the luminal cells , while basal cells do not express the HRs. Two-thirds of all breast cancers are ER-positive , which means that ERα expression is detectable by immunohistochemistry in more than 1% of the tumor cells . HR status is a major biological parameter with important implications for prognosis and treatment. Interestingly, unsupervised clustering of global gene expression profiles of large sets of clinical breast cancer specimens reproducibly separates the tumors into ER-positive luminal tumors and ER-negative tumors [11, 12].
Molecular mechanisms involved in ERα and PR signaling
In vitro studies, with the ER-positive breast cancer cell line MCF-7, have revealed that in their unliganded state ERα and PR are in complexes with heat shock proteins [13, 14]. Upon hormone binding, the receptors dissociate from the heat shock proteins, dimerize and associate with DNA . The receptors can bind to DNA directly or indirectly, by physically interacting with other transcription factors such as AP-1, SP-1, STAT3, or NF-κB [16–19]. Both ER and PR recruit coactivators and/or co-repressors to elicit transcriptional changes . In addition to these so-called genomic mechanisms, steroids activate rapid signaling events that involve the generation of second-messenger molecules, for instance cAMP, and activation of signal transduction pathways in the cytoplasm , known as nongenomic mechanisms.
Coactivators/co-repressors regulate ER-dependent and PR-dependent gene expression
Regulation of target gene expression by 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone is mediated by direct interaction of their nuclear receptors with co-regulatory proteins and components of the RNA polymerase II transcription initiation complex. Co-regulatory molecules can be functionally divided into coactivators and co-repressors (reviewed in ). Coactivators include SRC/p160 family members, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligases, p300/CBP and related proteins that possess enzymatic activities which modify histones to relax chromatin, thereby promoting transcription . Specifically, SRC and p300/CBP have histone acetyltransferase activity, whilst the E6-associated protein that interacts with both ER and PR has ubiquitin ligase activity .
Co-repressors, such as N-CoR and SMRT, form complexes with deacetylases that modify histone tails, thereby stabilizing a more compact chromatin state. In addition, co-repressor complexes present high affinity for deacetylated histones, which further enhance the repression of ER and PR target genes .
Nuclear receptor phosphorylation has been related to recruitment of coactivators/co-repressors. Different signaling pathways can affect specific interactions; phosphorylation of ERα is necessary for interactions of the receptor with certain coactivators while it reduces interactions with co-repressors (reviewed in ). Interestingly, receptor binding to coactivator can induce allosteric changes in coactivators enhancing the recruitment of other coactivators, consequently increasing receptor-dependent transcription.
ER and PR nongenomic mechanisms
At the same time, other signaling pathways impinge on ER and PR signaling by phosphorylating the receptors on multiple sites, thereby modulating their function [34, 35]. In particular, Ser-118 phosphorylation is important for ERα transcriptional activity . ER is phosphorylated in Ser-188 by MAPKs after EGFR activation by epidermal growth factor  or after estrogen stimulation . Other phosphorylation sites, such as Ser-305 and Thr-331, affect ER-coactivator interactions [38–40]. Besides, Thr-331 phosphorylation is required for nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of ERα . Not only serines and threonines are phosphorylated in ERα, but also tyrosine residues such as Tyr-537 that is a substrate for src family kinases and is required for the optimal ligand binding conformation of ERα . Interestingly, a single signaling pathway can activate HRs by several mechanisms. For example, protein kinase A can directly phosphorylate and thereby activate ERα , or can act through cAMP to activate ERα-mediated transcription . In addition, protein kinase A phosphorylates the coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase-1, allowing it to interact with the ERα. This interaction, in turn is necessary for cAMP activation of ERα  (Figure 1).
In the case of PR, the best-characterized phosphorylation sites are Ser-294, Ser-345 and Ser-400. Ser-294 phosphorylation is important for PR nuclear trans-location, ligand-dependent PR transactivation and the half-life of the receptor as Ser-294 phosphorylation targets the receptor for ubiquitination . A particularly interesting example of the complex crosstalk with tyrosine kinase receptor-driven signaling is the inter-action between PR and EGFR; progestins can activate EGFR, resulting in activation of c-Src and the downstream MAPK. This activation, in turn, leads to PR phos-phorylation on Ser-345 and activation of transcription . Besides, PR phosphorylation on Ser-294 has been implicated in PR ligand-independent activation of Src, and consequently Stat-3, resulting in increased proliferation of tumor cell lines . Phosphorylation on Ser-400 modulates ligand-independent transcriptional activities of PR. Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 can phosphorylate- on PR Ser-400 in the absence of progestins and is required for PR nuclear translocation in the absence of ligand .
HRs can hence be activated in a ligand-independent fashion by multiple kinase cascades [48–51]. Nongenomic estrogen effects predominantly involve classical ERs residing in cytoplasm and at the cell membrane, where ERα can be found in direct association with palmitic acid . However, other membrane receptors for estrogens and progesterone acting through nongenomic mechanisms have been described and are reviewed elsewhere .
With all ER and PR signaling converging on transcriptional regulation, the identification of target genes has long been of interest. Various global gene expression profiling studies identified between 100 and 500 E2-responsive genes (reviewed in ) and multiple PR targets [55–57]. More recently, large-scale detection of ER binding sites by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), initially combined with tiling arrays and more recently with deep sequencing, have established genome-wide maps (reviewed in ). These studies revealed more than 5,000 ER binding sites, of which only 4% were located in promoter regions. Most binding occurs at distant regulatory elements, suggesting very complex mechanisms of transcriptional regulation .
ERα and PR signaling in the mammary gland
Estrogens and progesterone play prominent roles in driving and coordinating postnatal mammary gland development. The mouse mammary gland offers unique experimental opportunities to genetically dissect signaling pathways involved in the development of this organ. In 3-week-old females, the inguinal gland can be cleared of its endogenous epithelium; any piece of mammary epithelium can then be engrafted into such a cleared fat pad and will grow out and recapitulate development . Comparison of HR-deficient and wild-type epithelia engrafted into contralateral cleared fat pads discerned that estrogens trigger expansion of the rudimentary ductal system into the mammary fat pad during puberty acting via epithelial ERα , whereas the epithelial PR is required in adulthood during estrous cycles and pregnancy to bring about side branching, thereby enhancing the complexity of the ductal system . When divested fat pads were reconstituted with ERα-/- or PR-/- epithelial cells mixed with wild-type cells the former contributed to all aspects of mammary gland development, establishing that the two hormones can act by paracrine mechanisms [61, 62]. HR-positive cells have thus emerged as sensor cells that act as mediators translating the systemic signals into local commands, thereby amplifying and prolonging the initial stimulus and coordinating the behavior of multiple cell types . Interestingly, HR-positive cells proliferate less than HR-negative cells [64, 65]. This has been attributed to negative regulation by transforming growth factor beta-1, which is specifically activated in the extracellular matrix of ERα-positive cells .
Paracrine mediators of estrogen function during puberty
Surprisingly, tissue recombination experiments revealed that AREG's cognate receptor, the EGFR, is not important in the mammary epithelium but is required in the mammary stroma [70–72]. Consistent with AREG produced by epithelial cells signaling to the stroma, stromal EGFR phosphorylation is decreased in the absence of epithelial ADAM17 . There are several candidates that may signal back from the stroma to ultimately trigger epithelial cell proliferation, foremost being insulin-like growth factor-1 (Figure 2). Expression of insulin-like growth factor-1 mRNA is restricted to the stromal compartment and can induce ductal elongation [73, 74]. Insulin-like growth factor-1 expression is also induced by estrogens in the mammary stroma of ovariectomized heifers , suggesting that this pathway is important and conserved across species.
Further attractive candidate mediators of stromal-epithelial crosstalk in response to AREG-EGFR signaling are members of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family. FGFs are required for the branching morphogenesis in several organs including the lungs and salivary glands [76, 77]. Specifically, FGF2 and FGF7 elicit branching of mammary organoids in three-dimensional matrigel cultures even in the absence of EGFR signaling , and in vivo stromal FGF7 expression is induced upon E2 stimulation . Deletion of the cognate FGF receptor 2b in mammary epithelial cells results in delayed ductal growth during puberty. Remarkably, in mosaic FGF receptor 2b mutant epithelia the highly proliferative ductal tips consist almost exclusively of wild-type cells. This indicates that FGF receptor 2b is required for epithelial cell proliferation , which may be elicited by FGFs released from stromal cells in response to EGFR activation by AREG (Figure 2). Importantly, around the proliferative ductal tips the basal lamina that typically separates epithelial and stromal compartments is thinned out or absent, a circumstance that facilitates interactions between epithelial and stromal cells.
Global gene expression profiling of mammary stroma after estrogen stimulation has revealed additional candidates that may signal back to the epithelium, such as a transforming growth factor beta extracellular inhibitor protein CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein 1, and thrombospondin 2 .
Paracrine mediators of progesterone receptor signaling function in the adult mammary gland
Wnt4 and receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) have been implicated as important paracrine mediators of progesterone function (Figure 2). Wnt4 is a secreted protein that belongs to the Wnt signaling pathway, involved in many developmental processes. Epithelial outgrowths derived from Wnt4-/- or wild-type mammary buds transplanted in contralateral cleared fat pads revealed that Wnt4 is required for side branching . Wnt4 mRNA expression is induced by progesterone, and depends on intact epithelial PR signaling. In situ hybridization studies revealed that the spatial distribution of Wnt-4 and PR mRNA are overlapping, suggesting that Wnt4 is expressed in PR-positive cells .
RANKL is a TNF family member that activates NF-κB  and plays a fundamental role in antigen-presenting cells and during osteoclastogenesis . The observation that RANKL-deficient females fail to lactate first pointed to a role of this factor in the mammary gland . RANKL mRNA expression is induced in ovariectomized mice stimulated with progesterone , and depends on intact PR signaling as PRB-deficient mammary glands show decreased RANKL expression . RANKL protein is exclusively expressed in PR-positive cells in the mammary epithelium [65, 86].
Ectopic expression of RANKL or its receptor (receptor activator of NF-κB) in the mammary epithelium is sufficient to induce side branching in virgin mammary glands , and RANKL-/- mammary epithelia lack side branches and alveoli . RANKL is necessary for the extensive proliferation of HR-negative epithelial cells in response to progesterone stimulation . Transgenic RANKL expression in ER-positive mammary epithelial cells of PR-deficient females rescued the phenotype of PR knockout, unequivocally demonstrating that RANKL is an essential mediator of progesterone signaling .
Another paracrine mediator of PR signaling is calcitonin (Figure 2), a 32-amino-acid peptide hormone involved in calcium homeostasis . Calcitonin expression is induced by progesterone in the luminal cells . The cognate calcitonin receptor is expressed in the myoepithelium, suggesting that calcitonin may act as a paracrine factor in a heterotypic interaction; its biological function remains to be defined .
Taken together ER and PR nodes in the mammary gland involve paracrine signaling loops, with a strong involvement of the stroma in the case of pubertal ER signaling and possibly more crosstalk with myoepithelial cells in PR-driven epithelial proliferation.
ER, PR and mammary stem cells
Mammary stem cells have been defined as cells with the ability to reconstitute cleared fat pads and were shown to be enriched in a basal cell population characterized by a cell surface antigen profile consisting of low levels of the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored protein CD24 and high expression levels of β1-integrin (CD29) and α6-integrin (CD49) (CD24+CD29highCD49high) [91, 92]. As these cells do not express HRs , it has been proposed that they are activated by hormones through paracrine signaling [63, 94]. Elegant fluorescence-activated cell sorting experiments revealed that the size of the stem-cell-enriched population depends on the hormonal status of the animal, increasing during diestrous and pregnancy and decreasing with ovariectomy and antiestrogen treatments [95, 96]. RANKL has been proposed to act as a paracrine mediator of stem cell activation- because expression of its cognate receptor, RANK, is enriched in the basal compartment [95, 96]. However, recent lineage tracing experiments indicate that luminally and basally restricted stem cells coexist in the postnatal mammary gland ; hence a factor that activates luminal stem cells remains to be ascertained.
Clues about hormone receptor function from studies on breast cancer samples
Genes that are part of the estrogen receptor alpha-positive breast tumor expression signatures
Extended gene name
Perou and colleagues 
West and colleagues 
Gruvberger and colleagues 
Dressman and colleagues 
Van't Veer and colleagues 
Sotiriou and colleagues 
Schneider and colleagues 
Tozlu and colleagues 
Wilson and colleagues 
Gata binding protein 3
Forkhead box A 1/HNF 3a
X-box binding protein 1
Solute carrier family 39 member 6
Trefoil factor 1
Trefoil factor 1
Solute carrier family 1 member 4
Solute carrier family 7 member 2
v-myb avian myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog
Runt-related transcription factor 1
B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2
Solute carrier family 7 member 5
GATA-3 was shown to be expressed in the luminal cells of the normal mouse mammary gland and to be required to maintain luminal epithelial differentiation [107, 108]. Loss of GATA-3 resulted in a decreased number of ERα-expressing cells , suggesting that GATA-3 is up stream of ERα. In cell lines, however, estrogen stimulation results in an increase of GATA-3 transcripts, indicating that GATA-3 itself may be regulated by ERα . Furthermore, ERα binds to the GATA-3 gene in ChIP assays [110–113]. Accordingly, it has been postulated that GATA-3 and ERα are involved in a positive cross-regulatory loop, with each of them required for the transcription of the other . In the MMTV-PyMT mammary tumor model, GATA-3 loss marks progression from adenoma to early carcinoma and the onset of tumor spreading . Clinically, GATA-3 expression shows inverse association with histological grade and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression  and has been validated as a predictor for response to hormonal therapy in ERα-positive tumors [115, 116].
FOXA1 is also important for mammary gland development [11, 102, 117]. Like GATA-3 or ERα loss, FOXA1 deletion from the mammary epithelium leads to impaired pubertal ductal morphogenesis . ERα expression is undetectable in tissue recombinants with FOXA1-/- epithelium engrafted under the kidney capsule, suggesting that FOXA1 is necessary for ERα expression . Besides, FOXA1 and ERα interact in the yeast two-hybrid system  and between 7 and 48% of genes recruiting ER have been suggested to also bind FOXA1 in MCF-7 cells [110, 120], whereas FOXA1 enhances the interaction between ER and chromatin [121–123]. FOXA1 expression in ER-positive tumors correlates with a good prognosis , and is inversely associated with tumor size, histological grade, lymph vascular invasion, lymph node stage and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 over expression .
FOXA1 and GATA-3 are also related to each other; ectopic expression of GATA-3 induces FOXA1 mRNA  and GATA-3 binds to FOXA1 promoter in ChIP assays in MCF-7 cells  and in the normal mammary gland , suggesting that FOXA1 is a GATA-3 target gene.
Cyclin D1 is linked in multiple ways to ER/PR function. In the mouse mammary gland, cyclin D1 was shown to be required for proliferation of HR-positive cells in response to progesterone . Amplification and overexpression occurs almost exclusively in ER-positive tumors ; cyclin D1 and ERα are frequently coexpressed in ductal hyperplasias and in breast carcinomas [128, 129]. Within ER-positive tumors, cyclin D1 amplification identifies a group of women with poor prognosis .
Interestingly, when T47D and MCF-7 cells are exposed to E2, the expression profiles between both cell lines shared several regulated genes and are similar, and some of them overlap with genes expressed in ERα-positive tumors . Furthermore, similar studies have shown that several of the ERα signature genes are upmodulated upon E2 stimulation in breast cancer ERα-positive cell lines, with estrogen-responsive genes including GATA-3, FOXA-1, cyclin D1, trefoil factor 1, X-box binding protein 1, LIV-1, stanniocalcin 2, B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2, and Myb [111, 134–140]. Interestingly, several genes identified as E2-regulated genes in MCF-7 cells (such as cyclin D1 and GATA-3)  are present in tumor-defined luminal/ER gene clusters and help to predict outcome in response to tamoxifen treatment .
Global mapping of ERα binding sites through ChIP-seq has revealed sites in FOXA1 [111, 113], GATA-3 [111, 113], CCND1 [111, 142] and Runt-related transcription factor 1 . Interestingly, ERα also binds to AREG , which is an important mediator of ER function in pubertal mammary gland development and is regulated by E2 in breast cancer cell lines . AREG is not part of the luminal signatures but nevertheless may still have a role in breast tumors, possibly early in breast carcinogenesis when paracrine control mechanisms are still intact that might be lost later during tumor progression.
Global ER-binding events were mapped recently for the first time in tumor samples . Excitingly, this study revealed signatures that predict clinical outcome.
PR-associated nodes in breast cancer
In most cases, PR-positive tumors also express ER and are studied within the ER-positive tumor group. Based on global gene expression studies on T47D and primary human bronchial epithelial cells , expression of RANKL and Wnt4 is not regulated by progesterone [55–57], yet PR has been shown to bind to the Wnt4 promoter by ChIP assay in T47D cells .
Clinically, 27% of primary tumors express receptor activator of NF-κB . RANKL expression was found in 11% of human invasive breast carcinoma , suggesting that the pathway may be active. Similarly, a role for Wnt signaling in breast cancer is suggested by the finding that extracellular inhibitors of the pathway such as secreted frizzled-related proteins, Dickkopf-3, Wntinhibitory factor-1 and the intracellular antagonist of β-catenin, adenomatous polyposis coli, are epigenetically silenced in breast tumors [148–154]. Hence, these paracrine factors and the signaling they elicit may have a role in breast carcinogenesis.
HR-positive cells in the mammary gland act as sensor cells; they detect the systemic requirements reflected in hormone levels and translate them into local commands. The molecular underpinnings of this switching station are ERα and PR and their signaling nodes. Mouse genetics have established that in vivo paracrine signaling is of central importance to coordinate the behavior of luminal and stromal cells (ER) during puberty and of luminal and myoepithelial cells (PR) in the adult mammary gland. In vitro experiments with ER-positive breast cancer cell lines have revealed that these receptor-signaling nodes coordinate the actions of distantly acting endocrine signals with locally acting receptor tyrosine kinase and G-protein-coupled receptor ligands that ultimately modulate transcription. At least for ER we now know that the vast majority of its genomic action occurs through distant control elements.
Despite the limited overlap between the nodes emerging from the distinct approaches in breast cancer cell lines, during mammary gland development and in breast tumors, the EGFR pathway appears tightly linked to ERα and PR signaling at different levels. There is continuous crosstalk between EGFR and HRs  by nongenomic mechanisms, and in vivo the EGFR ligand AREG is an important paracrine mediator of estrogen action. AREG is also implicated early in breast carcinogenesis, as it was the most upregulated gene in a comparison between hyperplastic enlarged lobular units and normal terminal duct lobular units .
A major challenge remains to integrate the information acquired from the different approaches. Whether the intracellular signaling cascades triggered by hormones in cell lines work similarly in vivo remains to be determined. Increasingly sophisticated fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based cell separation approaches, laser capture dissection as well as in vivo signaling/imaging approaches should help to connect the currently separated views of ERα/PR signaling, taking into account that they operate only in a minor subset of cells in vivo.
epidermal growth factor receptor
fibroblast growth factor
forkhead box protein A1
mitogen-activated protein kinase
mouse mammary tumor virus, polyoma middle T
receptor activator of NF-κB ligand
tumor necrosis factor.
This work was supported by NCCR Molecular Oncology, SNF (SNF grant 31003A). TT was the recipient of a Marie Curie Incoming international fellowship and LJR received a fellowship from the Government of the Basque Country.
- Brisken C, O'Malley B: Hormone action in the mammary gland. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2: a003178-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carmeci C, Thompson DA, Ring HZ, Francke U, Weigel RJ: Identification of a gene (GPR30) with homology to the G-protein-coupled receptor superfamily associated with estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. Genomics. 1997, 45: 607-617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu Y, Rice CD, Pang Y, Pace M, Thomas P: Cloning, expression, and characterization of a membrane progestin receptor and evidence it is an intermediary in meiotic maturation of fish oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 2231-2236.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- McKenna NJ, O'Malley BW: Combinatorial control of gene expression by nuclear receptors and coregulators. Cell. 2002, 108: 465-474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards DP: The role of coactivators and corepressors in the biology and mechanism of action of steroid hormone receptors. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2000, 5: 307-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellmann S, Sticht H, Thiel F, Beckmann MW, Strick R, Strissel PL: Estrogen and progesterone receptors: from molecular structures to clinical targets. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009, 66: 2405-2426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kastner P, Krust A, Turcotte B, Stropp U, Tora L, Gronemeyer H, Chambon P: Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 1603-1614.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Clarke RB, Howell A, Potten CS, Anderson E: Dissociation between steroid receptor expression and cell proliferation in the human breast. Cancer Res. 1997, 57: 4987-4991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herynk MH, Fuqua SA: Estrogen receptor mutations in human disease. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 869-898.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ: Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009. Ann Oncol. 2009, 20: 1319-1329.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D: Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000, 406: 747-752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lønning PE, Børresen-Dale AL: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 10869-10874.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung-Testas I, Renoir JM, Baulieu EE, Feramisco JR, Welch WJ: The common 90-kd protein component of non-transformed '8S' steroid receptors is a heat-shock protein. EMBO J. 1985, 4: 3131-3135.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Echeverria PC, Picard D: Molecular chaperones, essential partners of steroid hormone receptors for activity and mobility. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010, 1803: 641-649.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falkenstein E, Tillmann HC, Christ M, Feuring M, Wehling M: Multiple actions of steroid hormones - a focus on rapid, nongenomic effects. Pharmacol Rev. 2000, 52: 513-556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petz LN, Ziegler YS, Loven MA, Nardulli AM: Estrogen receptor alpha and activating protein-1 mediate estrogen responsiveness of the progesterone receptor gene in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2002, 143: 4583-4591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jeffy BD, Hockings JK, Kemp MQ, Morgan SS, Hager JA, Beliakoff J, Whitesell LJ, Bowden GT, Romagnolo DF: An estrogen receptor-alpha/p300 complex activates the BRCA-1 promoter at an AP-1 site that binds Jun/Fos transcription factors: repressive effects of p53 on BRCA-1 transcription. Neoplasia. 2005, 7: 873-882.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Han WD, Si YL, Zhao YL, Li Q, Wu ZQ, Hao HJ, Song HJ: GC-rich promoter elements maximally confers estrogen-induced transactivation of LRP16 gene through ERα/Sp1 interaction in MCF-7 cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008, 109: 47-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Proietti CJ, Beguelin W, Flaque MC, Cayrol F, Rivas MA, Tkach M, Charreau EH, Schillaci R, Elizalde PV: Novel role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 as a progesterone receptor coactivator in breast cancer. Steroids. 2011, 76: 381-392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Acconcia F, Kumar R: Signaling regulation of genomic and nongenomic functions of estrogen receptors. Cancer Lett. 2006, 238: 1-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- O'Malley BW, Kumar R: Nuclear receptor coregulators in cancer biology. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 8217-8222.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stanisic V, Lonard DM, O'Malley BW: Modulation of steroid hormone receptor activity. Prog Brain Res. 2010, 181: 153-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nawaz Z, Lonard DM, Smith CL, Lev-Lehman E, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW: The Angelman syndrome-associated protein, E6-AP, is a coactivator for the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily. Mol Cell Biol. 1999, 19: 1182-1189.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stanya KJ, Kao HY: New insights into the functions and regulation of the transcriptional corepressors SMRT and N-CoR. Cell Div. 2009, 4: 1-8.Google Scholar
- Smith CL, O'Malley BW: Coregulator function: a key to understanding tissue specificity of selective receptor modulators. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 45-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Migliaccio A, Di Domenico M, Castoria G, de Falco A, Bontempo P, Nola E, Auricchio F: Tyrosine kinase/p21ras/MAP-kinase pathway activation by estradiol-receptor complex in MCF-7 cells. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 1292-1300.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Migliaccio A, Piccolo D, Castoria G, Di Domenico M, Bilancio A, Lombardi M, Gong W, Beato M, Auricchio F: Activation of the Src/p21ras/Erk pathway by progesterone receptor via cross-talk with estrogen receptor. EMBO J. 1998, 17: 2008-2018.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Simoncini T, Hafezi-Moghadam A, Brazil DP, Ley K, Chin WW, Liao JK: Interaction of oestrogen receptor with the regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase. Nature. 2000, 407: 538-541.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Castoria G, Migliaccio A, Bilancio A, Di Domenico M, de Falco A, Lombardi M, Fiorentino R, Varricchio L, Barone MV, Auricchio F: PI3-kinase in concert with Src promotes the S-phase entry of oestradiol-stimulated MCF-7 cells. EMBO J. 2001, 20: 6050-6059.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Castoria G, Barone MV, Di Domenico M, Bilancio A, Ametrano D, Migliaccio A, Auricchio F: Non-transcriptional action of oestradiol and progestin triggers DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 2500-2510.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lombardi M, Castoria G, Migliaccio A, Barone MV, Di Stasio R, Ciociola A, Bottero D, Yamaguchi H, Appella E, Auricchio F: Hormone-dependent nuclear export of estradiol receptor and DNA synthesis in breast cancer cells. J Cell Biol. 2008, 182: 327-340.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boonyaratanakornkit V, Scott MP, Ribon V, Sherman L, Anderson SM, Maller JL, Miller WT, Edwards DP: Progesterone receptor contains a proline-rich motif that directly interacts with SH3 domains and activates c-Src family tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell. 2001, 8: 269-280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Faivre EJ, Lange CA: Progesterone receptors upregulate Wnt-1 to induce epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and c-Src-dependent sustained activation of Erk1/2 mitogen-activated protein kinase in breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 27: 466-480.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lannigan DA: Estrogen receptor phosphorylation. Steroids. 2003, 68: 1-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward RD, Weigel NL: Steroid receptor phosphorylation: assigning function to site-specific phosphorylation. Biofactors. 2009, 35: 528-536.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bunone G, Briand PA, Miksicek RJ, Picard D: Activation of the unliganded estrogen receptor by EGF involves the MAP kinase pathway and direct phosphorylation. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 2174-2183.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Joel PB, Traish AM, Lannigan DA: Estradiol-induced phosphorylation of serine 118 in the estrogen receptor is independent of p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 13317-13323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talukder AH, Li DQ, Manavathi B, Kumar R: Serine 28 phosphorylation of NRIF3 confers its co-activator function for estrogen receptor-alpha transactivation. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 5233-5242.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zwart W, Griekspoor A, Berno V, Lakeman K, Jalink K, Mancini M, Neefjes J, Michalides R: PKA-induced resistance to tamoxifen is associated with an altered orientation of ERalpha towards co-activator SRC-1. EMBO J. 2007, 26: 3534-3544.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lee H, Bai W: Regulation of estrogen receptor nuclear export by ligand-induced and p38-mediated receptor phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002, 22: 5835-5845.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Arnold SF, Vorojeikina DP, Notides AC: Phosphorylation of tyrosine 537 on the human estrogen receptor is required for binding to an estrogen response element. J Biol Chem. 1995, 270: 30205-30212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujimoto N, Katzenellenbogen BS: Alteration in the agonist/antagonist balance of antiestrogens by activation of protein kinase A signaling pathways in breast cancer cells: antiestrogen selectivity and promoter dependence. Mol Endocrinol. 1994, 8: 296-304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carascossa S, Dudek P, Cenni B, Briand PA, Picard D: CARM1 mediates the ligand-independent and tamoxifen-resistant activation of the estrogen receptor alpha by cAMP. Genes Dev. 2010, 24: 708-719.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lange CA, Shen T, Horwitz KB: Phosphorylation of human progesterone receptors at serine-294 by mitogen-activated protein kinase signals their degradation by the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 1032-1037.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Faivre EJ, Daniel AR, Hillard CJ, Lange CA: Progesterone receptor rapid signaling mediates serine 345 phosphorylation and tethering to specificity protein 1 transcription factors. Mol Endocrinol. 2008, 22: 823-837.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Proietti CJ, Rosemblit C, Beguelin W, Rivas MA, Diaz Flaque MC, Charreau EH, Schillaci R, Elizalde PV: Activation of Stat3 by heregulin/ErbB-2 through the co-option of progesterone receptor signaling drives breast cancer growth. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29: 1249-1265.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pierson-Mullany LK, Lange CA: Phosphorylation of progesterone receptor serine 400 mediates ligand-independent transcriptional activity in response to activation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase 2. Mol Cell Biol. 2004, 24: 10542-10557.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cenni B, Picard D: Ligand-independent activation of steroid receptors: new roles for old players. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1999, 10: 41-46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denner LA, Weigel NL, Maxwell BL, Schrader WT, O'Malley BW: Regulation of progesterone receptor-mediated transcription by phosphorylation. Science. 1990, 250: 1740-1743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Power RF, Mani SK, Codina J, Conneely OM, O'Malley BW: Dopaminergic and ligand-independent activation of steroid hormone receptors. Science. 1991, 254: 1636-1639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ignar-Trowbridge DM, Nelson KG, Bidwell MC, Curtis SW, Washburn TF, McLachlan JA, Korach KS: Coupling of dual signaling pathways: epidermal growth factor action involves the estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 4658-4662.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hammes SR, Levin ER: Extranuclear steroid receptors: nature and actions. Endocr Rev. 2007, 28: 726-741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prossnitz ER, Arterburn JB, Smith HO, Oprea TI, Sklar LA, Hathaway HJ: Estrogen signaling through the transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor GPR30. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008, 70: 165-190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welboren WJ, Sweep FC, Span PN, Stunnenberg HG: Genomic actions of estrogen receptor alpha: what are the targets and how are they regulated?. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009, 16: 1073-1089.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Afhuppe W, Sommer A, Muller J, Schwede W, Fuhrmann U, Moller C: Global gene expression profiling of progesterone receptor modulators in T47D cells provides a new classification system. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009, 113: 105-115.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mrusek S, Classen-Linke I, Vloet A, Beier HM, Krusche CA: Estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate regulated genes in T47D breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005, 235: 39-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richer JK, Jacobsen BM, Manning NG, Abel MG, Wolf DM, Horwitz KB: Differential gene regulation by the two progesterone receptor isoforms in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 5209-5218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martens JH, Rao NA, Stunnenberg HG: Genome-wide interplay of nuclear receptors with the epigenome. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010, 1812: 818-823.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin CY, Vega VB, Thomsen JS, Zhang T, Kong SL, Xie M, Chiu KP, Lipovich L, Barnett DH, Stossi F, Yeo A, George J, Kuznetsov VA, Lee YK, Charn TH, Palanisamy N, Miller LD, Cheung E, Katzenellenbogen BS, Ruan Y, Bourque G, Wei CL, Liu ET: Whole-genome cartography of estrogen receptor alpha binding sites. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3: e87-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Deome KB, Faulkin LJ, Bern HA, Blair PB: Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Res. 1959, 19: 515-520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mallepell S, Krust A, Chambon P, Brisken C: Paracrine signaling through the epithelial estrogen receptor alpha is required for proliferation and morphogenesis in the mammary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 2196-2201.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brisken C, Park S, Vass T, Lydon JP, O'Malley BW, Weinberg RA: A paracrine role for the epithelial progesterone receptor in mammary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 5076-5081.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brisken C, Duss S: Stem cells and the stem cell niche in the breast: an integrated hormonal and developmental perspective. Stem Cell Rev. 2007, 3: 147-156.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shoker BS, Jarvis C, Clarke RB, Anderson E, Hewlett J, Davies MP, Sibson DR, Sloane JP: Estrogen receptor-positive proliferating cells in the normal and precancerous breast. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 1811-1815.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beleut M, Rajaram RD, Caikovski M, Ayyanan A, Germano D, Choi Y, Schneider P, Brisken C: Two distinct mechanisms underlie progesterone-induced proliferation in the mammary gland. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010, 107: 2989-2994.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ewan KB, Oketch-Rabah HA, Ravani SA, Shyamala G, Moses HL, Barcellos-Hoff MH: Proliferation of estrogen receptor-alpha-positive mammary epithelial cells is restrained by transforming growth factor-beta1 in adult mice. Am J Pathol. 2005, 167: 409-417.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Luetteke NC, Qiu TH, Fenton SE, Troyer KL, Riedel RF, Chang A, Lee DC: Targeted inactivation of the EGF and amphiregulin genes reveals distinct roles for EGF receptor ligands in mouse mammary gland development. Development. 1999, 126: 2739-2750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ciarloni L, Mallepell S, Brisken C: Amphiregulin is an essential mediator of estrogen receptor alpha function in mammary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 5455-5460.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Plowman GD, Green JM, McDonald VL, Neubauer MG, Disteche CM, Todaro GJ, Shoyab M: The amphiregulin gene encodes a novel epidermal growth factor-related protein with tumor-inhibitory activity. Mol Cell Biol. 1990, 10: 1969-1981.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sternlicht MD, Sunnarborg SW, Kouros-Mehr H, Yu Y, Lee DC, Werb Z: Mammary ductal morphogenesis requires paracrine activation of stromal EGFR via ADAM17-dependent shedding of epithelial amphiregulin. Development. 2005, 132: 3923-3933.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sebastian J, Richards RG, Walker MP, Wiesen JF, Werb Z, Derynck R, Hom YK, Cunha GR, DiAugustine RP: Activation and function of the epidermal growth factor receptor and erbB-2 during mammary gland morphogenesis. Cell Growth Differ. 1998, 9: 777-785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiesen JF, Young P, Werb Z, Cunha GR: Signaling through the stromal epidermal growth factor receptor is necessary for mammary ductal development. Development. 1999, 126: 335-344.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Richert MM, Wood TL: The insulin-like growth factors (IGF) and IGF type I receptor during postnatal growth of the murine mammary gland: sites of messenger ribonucleic acid expression and potential functions. Endocrinology. 1999, 140: 454-461.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walden PD, Ruan W, Feldman M, Kleinberg DL: Evidence that the mammary fat pad mediates the action of growth hormone in mammary gland development. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 659-662.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li RW, Meyer MJ, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Connor EE, Van Amburgh ME, Boisclair YR, Capuco AV: Identification of estrogen-responsive genes in the parenchyma and fat pad of the bovine mammary gland by microarray analysis. Physiol Genomics. 2006, 27: 42-53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters K, Werner S, Liao X, Wert S, Whitsett J, Williams L: Targeted expression of a dominant negative FGF receptor blocks branching morphogenesis and epithelial differentiation of the mouse lung. EMBO J. 1994, 13: 3296-3301.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman MP, Kidder BL, Steinberg ZL, Lakhani S, Ho S, Kleinman HK, Larsen M: Gene expression profiles of mouse submandibular gland development: FGFR1 regulates branching morphogenesis in vitro through BMP-and FGF-dependent mechanisms. Development. 2002, 129: 5767-5778.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pedchenko VK, Imagawa W: Estrogen treatment in vivo increases keratinocyte growth factor expression in the mammary gland. J Endocrinol. 2000, 165: 39-49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lu P, Ewald AJ, Martin GR, Werb Z: Genetic mosaic analysis reveals FGF receptor 2 function in terminal end buds during mammary gland branching morphogenesis. Dev Biol. 2008, 321: 77-87.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Deroo BJ, Hewitt SC, Collins JB, Grissom SF, Hamilton KJ, Korach KS: Profile of estrogen-responsive genes in an estrogen-specific mammary gland outgrowth model. Mol Reprod Dev. 2009, 76: 733-750.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Brisken C, Heineman A, Chavarria T, Elenbaas B, Tan J, Dey SK, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Weinberg RA: Essential function of Wnt-4 in mammary gland development downstream of progesterone signaling. Genes Dev. 2000, 14: 650-654.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL: Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003, 423: 337-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, Kelley MJ, Duns tan CR, Burgess T, Elliott R, Colombero A, Elliott G, Scully S, Hsu H, Sullivan J, Hawkins N, Davy E, Capparelli C, Eli A, Qian YX, Kaufman S, Sarosi I, Shalhoub V, Senaldi G, Guo J, Delaney J, Boyle WJ: Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell. 1998, 93: 165-176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fata JE, Kong YY, Li J, Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J, Moorehead RA, Elliott R, Scully S, Voura EB, Lacey DL, Boyle WJ, KhoKha R, Penninger JM: The osteoclast differentiation factor osteoprotegerin-ligand is essential for mammary gland development. Cell. 2000, 103: 41-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brisken C, Ayyannan A, Nguyen C, Heineman A, Reinhardt F, Tan J, Dey SK, Dotto GP, Weinberg RA: IGF-2 is a mediator of prolactin-induced morphogenesis in the breast. Dev Cell. 2002, 3: 877-887.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulac-Jericevic B, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Conneely OM: Defective mammary gland morphogenesis in mice lacking the progesterone receptor B isoform. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 9744-9749.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez-Valdivia R, Mukherjee A, Ying Y, Li J, Paquet M, DeMayo FJ, Lydon JP: The RANKL signaling axis is sufficient to elicit ductal side-branching and alveologenesis in the mammary gland of the virgin mouse. Dev Biol. 2009, 328: 127-139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mukherjee A, Soyal SM, Li J, Ying Y, He B, DeMayo FJ, Lydon JP: Targeting RANKL to a specific subset of murine mammary epithelial cells induces ordered branching morphogenesis and alveologenesis in the absence of progesterone receptor expression. FASEB J. 2010, 24: 4408-4419.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Copp DH, Cheney B: Calcitonin-a hormone from the parathyroid which lowers the calcium-level of the blood. Nature. 1962, 193: 381-382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ismail PM, DeMayo FJ, Amato P, Lydon JP: Progesterone induction of calcitonin expression in the murine mammary gland. J Endocrinol. 2004, 180: 287-295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stingl J, Eirew P, Ricketson I, Shackleton M, Vaillant F, Choi D, Li HI, Eaves CJ: Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells. Nature. 2006, 439: 993-997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shackleton M, Vaillant F, Simpson KJ, Stingl J, Smyth GK, Asselin-Labat ML, Wu L, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE: Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell. Nature. 2006, 439: 84-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asselin-Labat ML, Shackleton M, Stingl J, Vaillant F, Forrest NC, Eaves CJ, Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ: Steroid hormone receptor status of mouse mammary stem cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 1011-1014.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tanos T, Brisken C: What signals operate in the mammary niche?. Breast Dis. 2008, 29: 69-82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joshi PA, Jackson HW, Beristain AG, Di Grappa MA, Mote PA, Clarke CL, Stingl J, Waterhouse PD, Khokha R: Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature. 2010, 465: 803-807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asselin-Labat ML, Vaillant F, Sheridan JM, Pal B, Wu D, Simpson ER, Yasuda H, Smyth GK, Martin TJ, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE: Control of mammary stem cell function by steroid hormone signalling. Nature. 2010, 465: 798-802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van Keymeulen A, Rocha AS, Ousset M, Beck B, Bouvencourt G, Rock J, Sharma N, Dekoninck S, Blanpain C: Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature. 2011, 479: 189-193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prat A, Perou CM: Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2011, 5: 5-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- West M, Blanchette C, Dressman H, Huang E, Ishida S, Spang R, Zuzan H, Olson JA, Marks JR, Nevins JR: Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11462-11467.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen Y, Panavally S, Saal LH, Borg A, Ferno M, Peterson C, Meltzer PS: Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 5979-5984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dressman MA, Walz TM, Lavedan C, Barnes L, Buchholtz S, Kwon I, Ellis MJ, Polymeropoulos MH: Genes that co-cluster with estrogen receptor alpha in microarray analysis of breast biopsies. Pharmacogenomics J. 2001, 1: 135-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van 't Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, He YD, Hart AA, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ, Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002, 415: 530-536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sotiriou C, Neo SY, McShane LM, Korn EL, Long PM, Jazaeri A, Martiat P, Fox SB, Harris AL, Liu ET: Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 10393-10398.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schneider J, Ruschhaupt M, Buness A, Asslaber M, Regitnig P, Zatloukal K, Schippinger W, Ploner F, Poustka A, Sultmann H: Identification and meta-analysis of a small gene expression signature for the diagnosis of estrogen receptor status in invasive ductal breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119: 2974-2979.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tozlu S, Girault I, Vacher S, Vendrell J, Andrieu C, Spyratos F, Cohen P, Lidereau R, Bieche I: Identification of novel genes that co-cluster with estrogen receptor alpha in breast tumor biopsy specimens, using a large-scale real-time reverse transcription-PCR approach. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2006, 13: 1109-1120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson BJ, Giguere V: Meta-analysis of human cancer microarrays reveals GATA3 is integral to the estrogen receptor alpha pathway. Mol Cancer. 2008, 7: 49-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kouros-Mehr H, Slorach EM, Sternlicht MD, Werb Z: GATA-3 maintains the differentiation of the luminal cell fate in the mammary gland. Cell. 2006, 127: 1041-1055.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Asselin-Labat ML, Sutherland KD, Barker H, Thomas R, Shackleton M, Forrest NC, Hartley L, Robb L, Grosveld FG, van der Wees J, Lindeman G, Visvader J: Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation. Nat Cell Biol. 2007, 9: 201-209.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eeckhoute J, Keeton EK, Lupien M, Krum SA, Carroll JS, Brown M: Positive cross-regulatory loop ties GATA-3 to estrogen receptor alpha expression in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 6477-6483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Welboren WJ, van Driel MA, Janssen-Megens EM, van Heeringen SJ, Sweep FC, Span PN, Stunnenberg HG: ChIP-Seq of ERalpha and RNA polymerase II defines genes differentially responding to ligands. EMBO J. 2009, 28: 1418-1428.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grober OM, Mutarelli M, Giurato G, Ravo M, Cicatiello L, De Filippo MR, Ferraro L, Nassa G, Papa MF, Paris O, Tarallo R, Luo S, Schroth GP, Benes V, Weisz A: Global analysis of estrogen receptor beta binding to breast cancer cell genome reveals an extensive interplay with estrogen receptor alpha for target gene regulation. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 36-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Carroll JS, Meyer CA, Song J, Li W, Geistlinger TR, Eeckhoute J, Brodsky AS, Keeton EK, Fertuck KC, Hall GF, Wang Q, Bekiranov S, Sementchenko V, Fox EA, Silver PA, Gingeras TR, Liu XS, Brown M: Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 1289-1297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin VX, Leu YW, Liyanarachchi S, Sun H, Fan M, Nephew KP, Huang TH, Davuluri RV: Identifying estrogen receptor alpha target genes using integrated computational genomics and chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray. Nucl Acids Res. 2004, 32: 6627-6635.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kouros-Mehr H, Bechis SK, Slorach EM, Littlepage LE, Egeblad M, Ewald AJ, Pai SY, Ho IC, Werb Z: GATA-3 links tumor differentiation and dissemination in a luminal breast cancer model. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13: 141-152.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fang SH, Chen Y, Weigel RJ: GATA-3 as a marker of hormone response in breast cancer. J Surg Res. 2009, 157: 290-295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoon NK, Maresh EL, Shen D, Elshimali Y, Apple S, Horvath S, Mah V, Bose S, Chia D, Chang HR, Goodglick L: Higher levels of GATA3 predict better survival in women with breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2010, 41: 1794-1801.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Badve S, Turbin D, Thorat MA, Morimiya A, Nielsen TO, Perou CM, Dunn S, Huntsman DG, Nakshatri H: FOXA1 expression in breast cancer - correlation with luminal subtype A and survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (15 Pt 1): 4415-4421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernardo GM, Lozada KL, Miedler JD, Harburg G, Hewitt SC, Mosley JD, Godwin AK, Korach KS, Visvader JE, Kaestner KH, Abdul-Karim FW, Montano MM, Keri RA: FOXA1 is an essential determinant of ERα expression and mammary ductal morphogenesis. Development. 2010, 137: 2045-2054.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schuur ER, Loktev AV, Sharma M, Sun Z, Roth RA, Weigel RJ: Ligand-dependent interaction of estrogen receptor-alpha with members of the forkhead transcription factor family. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 33554-33560.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll JS, Liu XS, Brodsky AS, Li W, Meyer CA, Szary AJ, Eeckhoute J, Shao W, Hestermann EV, Geistlinger TR, Silver PA, Brown M: Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell. 2005, 122: 33-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carroll JS, Brown M: Estrogen receptor target gene: an evolving concept. Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 20: 1707-1714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Laganiere J, Deblois G, Lefebvre C, Bataille AR, Robert F, Giguere V: From the Cover: Location analysis of estrogen receptor alpha target promoters reveals that FOXA1 defines a domain of the estrogen response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 11651-11656.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hurtado A, Holmes KA, Ross-Innes CS, Schmidt D, Carroll JS: FOXA1 is a key determinant of estrogen receptor function and endocrine response. Nat Genet. 2010, 43: 27-33.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hisamatsu Y, Tokunaga E, Yamashita N, Akiyoshi S, Okada S, Nakashima Y, Aishima S, Morita M, Kakeji Y, Maehara Y: Impact of FOXA1 expression on the prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011, 19: 1145-1152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albergaria A, Paredes J, Sousa B, Milanezi F, Carneiro V, Bastos J, Costa S, Vieira D, Lopes N, Lam EW, Lunet N, Schmitt F: Expression of FOXA1 and GATA-3 in breast cancer: the prognostic significance in hormone receptor-negative tumours. Breast Cancer Res. 2009, 11: R40-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Usary J, Llaca V, Karaca G, Presswala S, Karaca M, He X, Langerod A, Karesen R, Oh DS, Dressler LG, Lonning PE, Strausberg RL, Chanock S, Borresen-Dale AL, Perou CM: Mutation of GATA3 in human breast tumors. Oncogene. 2004, 23: 7669-7678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eeckhoute J, Carroll JS, Geistlinger TR, Torres-Arzayus MI, Brown M: A cell-type-specific transcriptional network required for estrogen regulation of cyclin D1 and cell cycle progression in breast cancer. Genes Dev. 2006, 20: 2513-2526.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shoker BS, Jarvis C, Davies MP, Iqbal M, Sibson DR, Sloane JP: Immunodetectable cyclin D1 is associated with oestrogen receptor but not Ki67 in normal, cancerous and precancerous breast lesions. Br J Cancer. 2001, 84: 1064-1069.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oh YL, Choi JS, Song SY, Ko YH, Han BK, Nam SJ, Yang JH: Expression of p21Waf1, p27Kip1 and cyclin D1 proteins in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: relation with clinicopathologic characteristics and with p53 expression and estrogen receptor status. Pathol Int. 2001, 51: 94-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roy PG, Pratt N, Purdie CA, Baker L, Ashfield A, Quinlan P, Thompson AM: High CCND1 amplification identifies a group of poor prognosis women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010, 127: 355-360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kannan N, Kang J, Kong X, Tang J, Perry JK, Mohankumar KM, Miller LD, Liu ET, Mertani HC, Zhu T, Grandison PM, Liu DX, Lobie PE: Trefoil factor 3 is oncogenic and mediates anti-estrogen resistance in human mammary carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2010, 12: 1041-1053.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Amiry N, Kong X, Muniraj N, Kannan N, Grandison PM, Lin J, Yang Y, Vouyovitch CM, Borges S, Perry JK, Mertani HC, Zhu T, Liu D, Lobie PE: Trefoil factor-1 (TFF1) enhances oncogenicity of mammary carcinoma cells. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 4473-4483.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin CY, Strom A, Vega VB, Kong SL, Yeo AL, Thomsen JS, Chan WC, Doray B, Bangarusamy DK, Ramasamy A, Vergara LA, Tang S, Chong A, Bajic VB, Miler LD, Gustafsson J, Liu ET: Discovery of estrogen receptor alpha target genes and response elements in breast tumor cells. Genome Biol. 2004, 5: R66-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Manning DL, Daly RJ, Lord PG, Kelly KF, Green CD: Effects of oestrogen on the expression of a 4.4 kb mRNA in the ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cell line. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1988, 59: 205-212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor KM, Morgan HE, Smart K, Zahari NM, Pumford S, Ellis IO, Robertson JF, Nicholson RI: The emerging role of the LIV-1 subfamily of zinc transporters in breast cancer. Mol Med. 2007, 13: 396-406.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bouras T, Southey MC, Chang AC, Reddel RR, Willhite D, Glynne R, Henderson MA, Armes JE, Venter DJ: Stanniocalcin 2 is an estrogen-responsive gene coexpressed with the estrogen receptor in human breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 1289-1295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandouz M, Lombet A, Perrot JY, Jacob D, Carvajal S, Kazem A, Rostene W, Therwath A, Gompel A: Proapoptotic effects of antiestrogens, progestins and androgen in breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1999, 69: 463-471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drabsch Y, Hugo H, Zhang R, Dowhan DH, Miao YR, Gewirtz AM, Barry SC, Ramsay RG, Gonda TJ: Mechanism of and requirement for estrogen-regulated MYB expression in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 13762-13767.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gudas JM, Klein RC, Oka M, Cowan KH: Posttranscriptional regulation of the c-myb proto-oncogene in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1995, 1: 235-243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masiakowski P, Breathnach R, Bloch J, Gannon F, Krust A, Chambon P: Cloning of cDNA sequences of hormone-regulated genes from the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. Nucl Acids Res. 1982, 10: 7895-7903.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Oh DS, Troester MA, Usary J, Hu Z, He X, Fan C, Wu J, Carey LA, Perou CM: Estrogen-regulated genes predict survival in hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 1656-1664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stender JD, Kim K, Charn TH, Komm B, Chang KC, Kraus WL, Benner C, Glass CK, Katzenellenbogen BS: Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor alpha DNA binding and tethering mechanisms identifies Runx1 as a novel tethering factor in receptor-mediated transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2010, 30: 3943-3955.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ross-Innes CS, Stark R, Teschendorff AE, Holmes KA, Ali HR, Dunning MJ, Brown GD, Gojis O, Ellis IO, Green AR, Ali S, Chin SF, Palmieri C, Caldas C, Carroll JS: Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer. Nature. 2012, 481: 389-393.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Graham JD, Mote PA, Salagame U, van Dijk JH, Balleine RL, Huschtscha LI, Reddel RR, Clarke CL: DNA replication licensing and progenitor numbers are increased by progesterone in normal human breast. Endocrinology. 2009, 150: 3318-3326.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ramamoorthy S, Dhananjayan SC, Demayo FJ, Nawaz Z: Isoform-specific degradation of PR-B by E6-AP is critical for normal mammary gland development. Mol Endocrinol. 2010, 24: 2099-2113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Santini D, Perrone G, Roato I, Godio L, Pantano F, Grasso D, Russo A, Vincenzi B, Fratto ME, Sabbatini R, Della Pepa C, Porta C, Del Conte A, Schiavon G, Berruti A, Tomasino RM, Papotti M, Papapietro N, Onetti Muda A, Denaro V, Tonini G: Expression pattern of receptor activator of NFκB (RANK) in a series of primary solid tumors and related bone metastases. J Cell Physiol. 2011, 226: 780-784.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez-Suarez E, Jacob AP, Jones J, Miller R, Roudier-Meyer MP, Erwert R, Pinkas J, Branstetter D, Dougall WC: RANK ligand mediates progestin-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis. Nature. 2010, 468: 103-107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lo PK, Mehrotra J, D'Costa A, Fackler MJ, Garrett-Mayer E, Argani P, Sukumar S: Epigenetic suppression of secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1) expression in human breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006, 5: 281-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veeck J, Noetzel E, Bektas N, Jost E, Hartmann A, Knuchel R, Dahl E: Promoter hypermethylation of the SFRP2 gene is a high-frequent alteration and tumor-specific epigenetic marker in human breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2008, 7: 83-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Veeck J, Geisler C, Noetzel E, Alkaya S, Hartmann A, Knuchel R, Dahl E: Epigenetic inactivation of the secreted frizzled-related protein-5 (SFRP5) gene in human breast cancer is associated with unfavorable prognosis. Carcinogenesis. 2008, 29: 991-998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ai L, Tao Q, Zhong S, Fields CR, Kim WJ, Lee MW, Cui Y, Brown KD, Robertson KD: Inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 (WIF1) expression by epigenetic silencing is a common event in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2006, 27: 1341-1348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki H, Toyota M, Carraway H, Gabrielson E, Ohmura T, Fujikane T, Nishikawa N, Sogabe Y, Nojima M, Sonoda T, Mori M, Hirata K, Imai K, Shinomura Y, Baylin SB, Tokino T: Frequent epigenetic inactivation of Wnt antagonist genes in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 1147-1156.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jin Z, Tamura G, Tsuchiya T, Sakata K, Kashiwaba M, Osakabe M, Motoyama T: Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter hypermethylation in primary breast cancers. Br J Cancer. 2001, 85: 69-73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Virmani AK, Rathi A, Sathyanarayana UG, Padar A, Huang CX, Cunnigham HT, Farinas AJ, Milchgrub S, Euhus DM, Gilcrease M, Herman J, Minna JD, Gazdar AF: Aberrant methylation of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene promoter 1A in breast and lung carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 1998-2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Migliaccio A, Castoria G, Giovannelli P, Auricchio F: Cross talk between epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor and extra nuclear steroid receptors in cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010, 327: 19-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee S, Medina D, Tsimelzon A, Mohsin SK, Mao S, Wu Y, Allred DC: Alterations of gene expression in the development of early hyperplastic precursors of breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 2007, 171: 252-262.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar