Targets of miR-200c mediate suppression of cell motility and anoikis resistance
© Howe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 22 October 2010
Accepted: 18 April 2011
Published: 18 April 2011
miR-200c and other members of the miR-200 family promote epithelial identity by directly targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2, which repress E-cadherin and other genes involved in polarity. Loss of miR-200c is often observed in carcinoma cells that have undergone epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). Restoration of miR-200c to such cells leads to a reduction in stem cell-like characteristics, reduced migration and invasion, and increased sensitivity to taxanes. Here we investigate the functional role of novel targets of miR-200c in the aggressive behavior of breast and endometrial cancer cells.
Putative target genes of miR-200c identified by microarray profiling were validated as direct targets using dual luciferase reporter assays. Following restoration of miR-200c to triple negative breast cancer and type 2 endometrial cancer cell lines that had undergone EMT, levels of endogenous target mRNA and respective protein products were measured. Migration and sensitivity to anoikis were determined using wound healing assays or cell-death ELISAs and viability assays respectively.
We found that restoration of miR-200c suppresses anoikis resistance, a novel function for this influential miRNA. We identified novel targets of miR-200c, including genes encoding fibronectin 1 (FN1), moesin (MSN), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase type 2 (NTRK2 or TrkB), leptin receptor (LEPR), and Rho GTPase activating protein 19 (ARHGAP19). These targets all encode proteins normally expressed in cells of mesenchymal or neuronal origin; however, in carcinoma cells that lack miR-200c they become aberrantly expressed and contribute to the EMT phenotype and aggressive behavior. We showed that these targets are inhibited upon restoration of miR-200c to aggressive breast and endometrial cancer cells. We demonstrated that inhibition of MSN and/or FN1 is sufficient to mediate the ability of miR-200c to suppress cell migration. Lastly, we showed that targeting of TrkB mediates the ability of miR-200c to restore anoikis sensitivity.
miR-200c maintains the epithelial phenotype not only by targeting ZEB1/2, which usually facilitates restoration of E-cadherin expression, but also by actively repressing a program of mesenchymal and neuronal genes involved in cell motility and anoikis resistance.
Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) occurs during development as it is required for formation of the neural crest and palate, among other processes [1, 2]. In cancer it is a pathological event associated with tumor progression and is thought to influence certain steps in the metastatic cascade, thereby contributing to the metastatic potential of carcinomas. Specifically, EMT likely contributes to the ability of carcinoma cells to invade through basement membrane and stroma and to intravasate into blood and lymph vessels [3–5]. The process of EMT is regulated by several transcription factors, including Twist, SNAIL, SLUG, ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1) and the closely related SIP1 (ZEB2), as reviewed in , which are transcriptional repressors of E-cadherin.
The miR-200 family of miRNAs, which includes miR-200c and miR-141 on chromosome 12 and miR-200a/b and miR-429 on chromosome 1, directly targets ZEB1 and ZEB2 [7–10]. Restoring miR-200c to aggressive breast, endometrial and ovarian cancer cells substantially decreases migration and invasion [9–13]. Since ZEB1 represses E-cadherin  and other genes involved in polarity , the reduction in migratory and invasive capacity observed when miR-200c is restored to cancer cells is widely thought to be due to the ability of miR-200c to target and repress ZEB1/2 which, in most cases, allows E-cadherin to be re-expressed. However, even in cell lines in which E-cadherin is not restored, miR-200c still dramatically reduces migration and invasion , implying that additional miR-200c targets can facilitate its ability to suppress cell motility.
We identify and confirm novel direct targets of miR-200c, including the genes encoding fibronectin 1 (FN1), moesin (MSN), neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase type 2 (NTRK2 or TrkB), leptin receptor (LEPR), and Rho GTPase activating protein 19 (ARHGAP19). These targets are all genes usually expressed in cells of mesenchymal or neuronal origin. However, in carcinoma cells that lack miR-200c, repression of these genes is compromised and they are allowed to be translated and contribute to an EMT phenotype and aggressive behavior. Here we show that MSN and FN1 are direct targets of miR-200c that contribute to the ability of miR-200c to suppress migration. We also identify a completely novel role for miR-200c - the ability to reverse anoikis resistance and we further pinpoint TrkB as the direct target that mediates this effect. Anoikis resistance is an important, yet understudied, step in the metastatic cascade.
Materials and methods
Hec50 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM L-glutamine. AN3CA cells and Ishikawa cells were grown in MEM with 5% FBS, nonessential amino acids (NEAA), penicillin, streptomycin and 1 nM insulin. MCF-7 cells were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, and 2 mM L-glutamine. MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in MEM with 5% FBS, HEPES, NEAA, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, and insulin. BT549 cells were grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS and insulin. All cells were grown in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. Cell line identities were authenticated by isolating genomic DNA using ZR genomic DNAII kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and DNA profiling multiplex PCR was performed using the Identifiler Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the UC Cancer Center DNA Sequencing and Analysis Core.
miR-200c (miRNA mimic) or scrambled negative control (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) at a concentration of 50 nM were incubated with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in culture medium per the manufacturer's instructions before addition to cells. Cells were incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs before replacement of medium.
DNA and shRNA constructs
pEGP-MSN (created by Stephen Shaw, National Institutes of Health, purchased from Addgene plasmid 20671, Cambridge, MA, USA) . FN1 was subcloned from pCR-XL-TOPO-FN1 (Open Biosystems, Catalog number MHS4426-99240322, Huntsville, AL, USA) into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). TrkB was subcloned from pBabe-TrkB (a gift from D. Peeper) into pcDNA3.1.
Expression profiling was performed on Hec50 cells transfected as described above and statistical analysis was performed as described previously . Array data have been provided to GEO, accession GSE25332. The heatmap was generated using GeneSpring GX 11 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and shows genes that are statistically significantly down-regulated by at least 1.5-fold in the miR-200c treated samples as compared to either the mock or scrambled control or both, and are predicted to be direct targets of miR-200c. Target site predictions were taken from TargetScan , http://microRNA.org, PicTar  and MicroCosm .
A section of the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of each target containing the putative binding site(s) for miR-200c was amplified by PCR from HeLa genomic DNA using the primers listed in Table S1 in Additional file 1. Fragments were cloned into the 3' UTR of a firefly luciferase reporter vector (pMIR-REPORT, Ambion) using HindIII and SpeI. Mutations in the miR-200c binding sites were generated by PCR directed mutagenesis. Mutation primers are listed in Table S1 in Additional file 1 and introduced mutations are in bold and shown above the mRNA in each figure. 3' UTR sequences and mutations were verified by sequencing. Hec50 cells (15,000 per well) plated in a 96-well plate were mock transfected, transfected with negative control, 50 nM miR-200c, 50 nM miR-200c antagomiR (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA)) alone (α200c) or in conjunction with miR-200c (α200c + 200c). After 24 hrs, the firefly reporter plasmid (196 ng) and a Renilla luciferase normalization plasmid pRL-SV40 (4 ng) were introduced using Lipofectamine 2000. Cells were harvested 48 hrs later for analysis using the Dual Luciferase Reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA)).
Real-time reverse transcription-PCR
RNA was harvested from cells using Trizol (Invitrogen) and treated with DNase 1 (Invitrogen) for 15 minutes at room temperature. RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA in a reaction containing reaction buffer, 10 mM DTT, 1 mM dNTPs, RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems), 250 ng random hexamers, and 200 units of MuLV-RT (Applied Biosystems). For normalization, real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed on the cDNA using eukaryotic 18S rRNA endogenous control primers and FAM-MGB probe (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit was used to generate cDNA for real-time RT-PCR reaction in conjunction with a miR-200c specific primer and probe (Applied Biosystems, assay ID 002300). The reverse transcription primer for miR-200c is a hairpin primer specific to the mature miRNA and will not bind to the precursor molecules. For validation of the microarray data, SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR was performed using primers specific for each target (primers listed in Table S1 in Additional file 1). To avoid the possibility of amplification artifacts, PCR products for all SYBR Green primer pairs were verified to produce single products by agarose electrophoresis and high resolution melt curve. The relative mRNA or miRNA levels were calculated using the comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt). Briefly, the Ct (cycle threshold) values for the rRNA or actin were subtracted from Ct values of the target gene to achieve the ΔCt value. The 2−ΔCt was calculated for each sample and then each of the values was divided by a control sample to achieve the relative mRNA or miRNA levels (ΔΔCt).
Whole-cell protein extracts prepared in RIPA lysis buffer, equalized to 50 μg by Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), separated by SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. For chemiluminecent detection, membranes were blocked in 5% milk in TBS-T and probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Primary antibodies used were ZEB1 (rabbit polyclonal from Dr. Doug Darling, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA; 1:1,500 dilution), E-cadherin (clone NCH-38 from DAKO, Carpinteria, CA, USA; 1 μg/mL), fibronectin (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA, clone 10/Fibronectin, 1:5000), moesin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA, clone EP1863Y, 1:10,000), ERM (Cell Signaling, Danver, MA, USA, #3142, 1:1000), TrkB (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, H-181, #sc8316, 1:200) and α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, clone B-5-1-2, 1:30,000). After incubation with appropriate secondary antibody, results were detected using Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent Plus (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). For fluorescent detection, membranes were blocked in 3% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in TBS-T and probed overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Goat anti-rabbit conjugated to Alexa Fluor 660 (Invitrogen, 1:5,000) and goat anti mouse conjugated to Alexa Fluor 660 (Invitrogen, 1:5,000) were used as appropriate and signal was detected by Odyssey (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Wound healing assay
Cells were transfected with miR-200c and controls as before and 24 hrs later transfected with vectors. Cells were then plated in six-well plates, allowed to adhere and grow to confluency. Cells were then treated for two hours with 10 μg/mL mitomycin C (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Wounds were made using a p20 pipet tip and cells were given 24 hrs (Hec50 and BT549) or 48 hrs (AN3CA) to migrate into wounds. Cells were stained with 0.05% crystal violet in 6% glutaraldehyde for one hour, rinsed repeatedly with water, mounted and imaged. For each condition five representative images were obtained for quantitation. Quantitation was performed by first thresholding the images to differentiate between cells (black) and background (white), determining the number of black pixels and the number of white pixels and then calculating the percentage of the image covered by cells.
Anoikis assay (cell viability and cell death ELISA)
Poly-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (poly-HEMA, Sigma-Aldrich) was reconstituted in 95% ethanol to a concentration of 12 mg/mL. To prepare poly-HEMA coated plates, 0.5 mL of 12 mg/mL solution was added to each well of a 24-well plate and allowed to dry overnight in a laminar flow tissue culture hood. Cells were transfected as before. Twenty-four hours after transfection 50,000 cells were plated in triplicate in poly-HEMA coated 24-well plates using regular culture medium. For cell viability assay, at 4 and 24 hrs after addition to poly-HEMA coated plates, viable and dead cells were stained with trypan blue and counted using the ViCell cell counter (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). For cell death ELISA assay (Roche, San Francisco, CA, USA) cells were plated as before, but the medium was collected at 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 hrs post plating. Each sample was pelleted, lysed and then frozen so that all samples could be read together at 405 nm and 490 nm (reference wavelength). The assay detects fragmented mono and oligonucleosomes in lysed cells by first binding histones with a biotinylated antibody which is bound to a streptavidin-coated plate. Samples are then bound by an HRP labeled anti-DNA antibody and color is developed by using an ABTS substrate.
Restoration of miR-200c decreases non-epithelial, EMT associated genes
By microarray expression profiling, we previously identified genes significantly altered upon restoration of miR-200c to Hec50 cells . Figure 1b is a heatmap of genes known to be involved in EMT that are statistically significantly decreased at least 1.5-fold upon restoration of miR-200c and are bioinformatically predicted to be targets of miR-200c. The heatmap additionally depicts miR-200c targets identified by others such as ZEB1 and 2 [8, 9], cofilin (CFL1)  and WAVE3 . In total we identified 74 genes that change more than 1.5-fold and are predicted by two of four target prediction programs to be direct targets of miR-200c Figure S1 in Additional file 1. Of these genes, 68 (92%) are repressed and 6 (8%) are up-regulated when miR-200c is restored. Initial validation of several of the targets with known involvement in EMT revealed that they are down-regulated at the message level in one or more of our model cell lines Figure S2 in Additional file 1. Based on these findings, we selected FN1, MSN, ARHGAP19, LEPR and TrkB (NTRK2 on the heatmap) to experimentally confirm as direct targets of miR-200c.
Breast and endometrial cancer cell lines that have undergone EMT and express ZEB1, also express FN1, MSN or both
Moesin (MSN), a regulator of cortical actin-membrane binding, is directly targeted and down-regulated by miR-200c
Down-regulation of MSN contributes to miR-200c mediated suppression of migration
The extracellular matrix protein fibronectin 1 (FN1) is directly targeted and down-regulated by miR-200c
Down-regulation of FN1 contributes to miR-200c mediated suppression of migration
The genes encoding Rho GTPase activating protein 19 (ARHGAP19) and leptin receptor (LEPR) are directly targeted and down-regulated by miR-200c
ARHGAP19 is a GTPase activating protein that has not been well characterized, but is predicted to regulate the activity of Cdc42, RhoA and/or Rac1 . The 3' UTR of ARHGAP19 contains one putative miR-200c binding site. We demonstrate that restoration of miR-200c causes an 80% reduction in luciferase activity only in the presence of miR-200c and not in the controls (Figure S3 in Additional file 1). LEPR and its ligand leptin are involved in the migration/invasion of trophoblasts  and the expression of leptin by mammary epithelial cells has been linked to tumorigenicity [32–34]. We demonstrate that restoration of miR-200c causes a 36% reduction in luciferase activity when the 3' UTR of LEPR is placed downstream of luciferase (Figure S4 in Additional file 1).
The anoikis suppressing neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2 or TrkB) is directly targeted and down-regulated by miR-200c
miR-200c suppresses anoikis resistance
Down-regulation of TrkB contributes to miR-200c mediated suppression of anoikis resistance
Progression and metastasis of carcinomas is a multistep process. EMT is thought to aid cancer cells as they invade through basement membrane and stroma, intravasate into blood or lymph vessels, and may also facilitate anoikis resistance, allowing tumor cells to survive the journey to the metastatic site. We sought to identify additional direct targets of miR-200c that mediate its potent effects.
Three of the new direct targets of miR-200c that we identify, MSN, FN1, and ARHGAP19, have been implicated in migration and invasion. MSN localizes to the trailing edge of invasive melanoma cells and disruption of this localization leads to decreased metastasis . MSN expression correlates with poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma  and basal breast cancer , a subtype with high risk of metastasis and recurrence. FN1 functions in cell migration through integrin binding  and can activate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) leading to increased motility and invasion of carcinoma cells [27, 28]. ARHGAP19 is a member of a family of GTPase activating proteins, and other family members, 8, 9, 12 and 15, are expressed in several types of cancer and activate Cdc42, Rac1 or RhoA [40–43], small GTPases required for migration. We demonstrate that FN1 and MSN are, at least in some cell lines, critical targets sufficient to mediate miR-200c's ability to inhibit migration in an in vitro wound healing assay. In some cell lines both MSN and FN1 are expressed, and in those cells both MSN and FN1 may contribute to migratory potential, but they are both repressed when miR-200c is restored. In other TNBC cells and type 2 endometrial cancer cells, either MSN or FN1 are expressed but not both. It is possible that even though miR-200c is absent, additional miRNA(s) that target these genes may be retained in some cells, or alternatively, factors that induce these genes at the promoter may be differentially expressed. In some cases ARHGAP19 may additionally contribute to migratory capacity; however, at present there is no antibody available to detect this protein. Loss of miR-200c could permit any of these genes, typically expressed in the more motile mesenchymal or neuronal cell types, to be inappropriately translated and expressed in epithelial cells. Expression of proteins such as MSN that actively contribute to cell motility by promoting front-rear polarity, combined with the loss of E-cadherin (which would decrease cell-cell attachments and reduce apical-basal polarity), may significantly contribute to the invasive capacity of carcinomas.
We demonstrate that restoration of miR-200c leads to a dramatic increase in sensitivity to anoikis (over a 100% increase in anoikis in some cell lines) and identify TrkB as a novel direct target of miR-200c. TrkB is a tyrosine kinase cell surface receptor typically expressed on neurons, which can be inappropriately expressed in carcinomas . In breast and ovarian cancer cell lines TrkB induces anoikis resistance [31, 33] and can induce EMT through activation of Twist . We previously demonstrated that miR-200c does not affect apoptosis when endometrial cancer cells are attached to plastic, although it does enhance apoptosis induced by taxanes [11, 12]. Thus, we conclude that miR-200c specifically enhances anoikis sensitivity, suggesting that restoration of miR-200c could limit the ability of breast and endometrial cancer cells to survive in the bloodstream.
Interestingly, all of the new miR-200c direct targets that we identify in this study (as well as other previously identified targets such as ZEB1/2 and TUBB3) contribute to the designation of this miRNA as a "guardian of the epithelial phenotype" because they are genes typically expressed in cells of mesenchymal or neuronal origin, but not in normal, well-differentiated epithelial cells.
Not all of the target genes that we identify change at the message level upon restoration of miR-200c. For example, although miR-200c directly targets ARHGAP19 (Figure S3 in Additional file 1), the message is down-regulated by addition of miR-200c in only 3 of 4 cell lines (Figure S2 in Additional file 1). There are several possible explanations for interference between a miRNA and its mRNA target in some cell lines. The miR-200c target site may be mutated or absent due to a shortening of the 3' UTR [46–49] or there may be RNA binding proteins present in particular cell lines that prevent miR-200c from binding . Importantly, for all of the targets that we follow up on in this study (MSN, FN1 and TrkB), protein levels are affected by miR-200c, indicating that it does have an affect on translation of these genes, regardless of whether it also affects degradation of the message.
In summary, miR-200c inhibits migration and invasion [9–13], stemness [51, 52], and chemoresistance [11, 12] and we now identify a completely novel role for miR-200c - the ability to reverse anoikis resistance, an important additional step in the metastatic cascade. We identify new targets of miR-200c, which together with previously identified targets, comprise a program of genes normally restricted to cells of mesenchymal or neuronal origin. We specifically pinpoint MSN and FN1 as well as TrkB as targets that can respectively mediate the ability of miR-200c to inhibit cell motility and anoikis resistance.
Members of the miR-200 family are down-regulated in breast cancer stem cells and normal mammary gland stem cells . Polycomb complexes facilitate stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency, and both Bmi1, a component of the PRC1 polycomb complex, and Suz12, a component of the PRC2 polycomb complex, have been identified as targets of miR-200 family members [51–53]. It is interesting to speculate as to whether expression of TrkB is involved in the ability of cancer stem cells to resist anoikis.
If feasible, effective in vivo delivery of miR-200c could potentially inhibit multiple steps in tumor progression, including tumor formation, cell motility/invasiveness, anoikis resistance and chemoresistance, by virtue of simultaneously repressing multiple, yet specific, targets expressed in carcinoma cells exhibiting an EMT phenotype. Although one in vivo study demonstrated that introduction of miR-200c reduced the ability of primary human breast cancer stem cells to form tumors in immune compromised mice , further in vivo studies will be necessary to specifically isolate the effects of miR-200 on other steps in the metastatic cascade, such as its potential to reverse anoikis resistance.
Dulbecco's modified eagle's medium
epithelial to mesenchymal transition
estrogen receptor alpha
focal adhesion kinase
fetal bovine serum
non-essential amino acids
triple negative breast cancer
We thank Daniel Peeper (Netherlands Cancer Institute) for his generous gift of pBabe-TrkB. We thank the development teams for the open source software packages Graphical Image Manipulation Program (GIMP) and Zotero. We acknowledge Christopher Korch, Ph.D., in the University of Colorado Cancer Center DNA Sequencing and Analysis Core (supported by the NIH/National Cancer Institute Cancer Core Support Grant P30 CA046934) for sequencing of constructs and verification of cell line identity. This work was supported by the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program Idea Award BC084162 and Susan G Komen Foundation KG090415 (JK Richer).
- Kalluri R, Weinberg RA: The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 1420-1428. 10.1172/JCI39104.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moustakas A, Heldin C: Signaling networks guiding epithelial-mesenchymal transitions during embryogenesis and cancer progression. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98: 1512-1520. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00550.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 442-454. 10.1038/nrc822.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huber MA, Kraut N, Beug H: Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2005, 17: 548-558. 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, Weinberg RA: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev Cell. 2008, 14: 818-829. 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.05.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peinado H, Olmeda D, Cano A: Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype?. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007, 7: 415-428. 10.1038/nrc2131.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hurteau GJ, Carlson JA, Spivack SD, Brock GJ: Overexpression of the microRNA hsa-miR-200c leads to reduced expression of transcription factor 8 and increased expression of E-cadherin. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 7972-7976. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ: The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008, 10: 593-601. 10.1038/ncb1722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burk U, Schubert J, Wellner U, Schmalhofer O, Vincan E, Spaderna S, Brabletz T: A reciprocal repression between ZEB1 and members of the miR-200 family promotes EMT and invasion in cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9: 582-89. 10.1038/embor.2008.74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Park S, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME: The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008, 22: 894-907. 10.1101/gad.1640608.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Cochrane DR, Howe EN, Spoelstra NS, Richer JK: Loss of miR-200c: A marker of aggressiveness and chemoresistance in female reproductive cancers. J Oncol. 2010, 2010: 821717-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cochrane DR, Spoelstra NS, Howe EN, Nordeen SK, Richer JK: MicroRNA-200c mitigates invasiveness and restores sensitivity to microtubule-targeting chemotherapeutic agents. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009, 8: 1055-1066.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Korpal M, Lee ES, Hu G, Kang Y: The miR-200 family inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer cell migration by direct targeting of E-cadherin transcriptional repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 14910-14914. 10.1074/jbc.C800074200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Eger A, Aigner K, Sonderegger S, Dampier B, Oehler S, Schreiber M, Berx G, Cano A, Beug H, Foisner R: DeltaEF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 2375-2385. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Aigner K, Dampier B, Descovich L, Mikula M, Sultan A, Schreiber M, Mikulits W, Brabletz T, Strand D, Obrist P, Sommergruber W, Schweifer N, Wernitznig A, Beug H, Foisner R, Eger A: The transcription factor ZEB1 (deltaEF1) promotes tumour cell dedifferentiation by repressing master regulators of epithelial polarity. Oncogene. 2007, 26: 6979-6988. 10.1038/sj.onc.1210508.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hao J, Liu Y, Kruhlak M, Debell KE, Rellahan BL, Shaw S: Phospholipase C-mediated hydrolysis of PIP2 releases ERM proteins from lymphocyte membrane. J Cell Biol. 2009, 184: 451-462. 10.1083/jcb.200807047.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- TargetScanHuman 5.1. [http://www.targetscan.org/]
- microRNA.org. [http://www.microrna.org/microrna/home.do]
- PicTar. [http://pictar.mdc-berlin.de/]
- Microcosm Targets. [http://www.ebi.ac.uk/enright-srv/microcosm/htdocs/targets/v5/]
- Sossey-Alaoui K, Bialkowska K, Plow EF: The miR200 family of microRNAs regulates WAVE3-dependent cancer cell invasion. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 33019-33029. 10.1074/jbc.M109.034553.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fiévet B, Louvard D, Arpin M: ERM proteins in epithelial cell organization and functions. Biochim Biophy Acta. 2007, 1773: 653-660. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.06.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Bertucci F, Esterni B, Ginestier C, Finetti P, Cervera N, Geneix J, Hassanein M, Rabayrol L, Sobol H, Taranger-Charpin C, Xerri L, Viens P, Birnbaum D, Jacquemier J: Moesin expression is a marker of basal breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2007, 121: 1779-1785. 10.1002/ijc.22923.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kobayashi H, Sagara J, Kurita H, Morifuji M, Ohishi M, Kurashina K, Taniguchi S: Clinical significance of cellular distribution of moesin in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 572-580. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1323-03.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Estecha A, Sánchez-Martín L, Puig-Kröger A, Bartolomé RA, Teixidó J, Samaniego R, Sánchez-Mateos P: Moesin orchestrates cortical polarity of melanoma tumour cells to initiate 3D invasion. J Cell Sci. 2009, 122: 3492-3501. 10.1242/jcs.053157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- He M, Cheng Y, Li W, Liu Q, Liu J, Huang J, Fu X: Vascular endothelial growth factor C promotes cervical cancer metastasis via up-regulation and activation of RhoA/ROCK-2/moesin cascade. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 170-10.1186/1471-2407-10-170.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meng XN, Jin Y, Yu Y, Bai J, Liu GY, Zhu J, Zhao YZ, Wang Z, Chen F, Lee K, Fu SB: Characterisation of fibronectin-mediated FAK signalling pathways in lung cancer cell migration and invasion. Br J Cancer. 2009, 101: 327-334. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605154.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ding J, Li D, Wang X, Wang C, Wu T: Fibronectin promotes invasiveness and focal adhesion kinase tyrosine phosphorylation of human colon cancer cell. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008, 55: 2072-2076.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michael KE, Dumbauld DW, Burns KL, Hanks SK, García AJ: Focal adhesion kinase modulates cell adhesion strengthening via integrin activation. Mol Biol Cell. 2009, 20: 2508-2519. 10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0076.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tcherkezian J, Lamarche-Vane N: Current knowledge of the large RhoGAP family of proteins. Biol Cell. 2007, 99: 67-86. 10.1042/BC20060086.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulz LC, Widmaier EP: The effect of leptin on mouse trophoblast cell invasion. Biol Reprod. 2004, 71: 1963-1967. 10.1095/biolreprod.104.032722.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klurfeld DM, Lloyd LM, Welch CB, Davis MJ, Tulp OL, Kritchevsky D: Reduction of enhanced mammary carcinogenesis in LA/N-cp (corpulent) rats by energy restriction. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1991, 196: 381-384.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waxler SH, Brecher G, Beal SL: The effect of fat-enriched diet on the incidence of spontaneous mammary tumors in obese mice. Pro Soc Exp Biol Med. 1979, 162: 365-368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolff GL, Kodell RL, Cameron AM, Medina D: Accelerated appearance of chemically induced mammary carcinomas in obese yellow (Avy/A) (BALB/c × VY) F1 hybrid mice. J Toxicol Environ Health. 1982, 10: 131-142. 10.1080/15287398209530237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Douma S, Van Laar T, Zevenhoven J, Meuwissen R, Van Garderen E, Peeper DS: Suppression of anoikis and induction of metastasis by the neurotrophic receptor TrkB. Nature. 2004, 430: 1034-1039. 10.1038/nature02765.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geiger TR, Peeper DS: Critical role for TrkB kinase function in anoikis suppression, tumorigenesis, and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 6221-6229. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu X, Liu L, Cai B, He Y, Wan X: Suppression of anoikis by the neurotrophic receptor TrkB in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 2008, 99: 543-552. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00722.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kupferman ME, Jiffar T, El-Naggar A, Yilmaz T, Zhou G, Xie T, Feng L, Wang J, Holsinger FC, Yu D, Myers JN: TrkB induces EMT and has a key role in invasion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2010, 29: 2047-2059. 10.1038/onc.2009.486.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ruoslahti E: Fibronectin and its integrin receptors in cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 1999, 76: 1-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johnstone CN, Castellví-Bel S, Chang LM, Bessa X, Nakagawa H, Harada H, Sung RK, Piqué JM, Castells A, Rustgi AK: ARHGAP8 is a novel member of the RHOGAP family related to ARHGAP1/CDC42GAP/p50RHOGAP: mutation and expression analyses in colorectal and breast cancers. Gene. 2004, 336: 59-71. 10.1016/j.gene.2004.01.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gentile A, D'Alessandro L, Lazzari L, Martinoglio B, Bertotti A, Mira A, Lanzetti L, Comoglio PM, Medico E: Met-driven invasive growth involves transcriptional regulation of Arhgap12. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 5590-5598. 10.1038/onc.2008.173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seoh ML, Ng CH, Yong J, Lim L, Leung T: ArhGAP15, a novel human RacGAP protein with GTPase binding property. FEBS Lett. 2003, 539: 131-137. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00213-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Wu C, Wang S, Huang W, Zhou Z, Ying K, Xie Y, Mao Y: Cloning and characterization of ARHGAP12, a novel human rhoGAP gene. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2002, 34: 325-331. 10.1016/S1357-2725(01)00134-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thiele CJ, Li Z, McKee AE: On Trk--the TrkB signal transduction pathway is an increasingly important target in cancer biology. Clin Cancer Res. 2009, 15: 5962-5967. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0651.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smit MA, Geiger TR, Song J, Gitelman I, Peeper DS: A Twist-Snail axis critical for TrkB-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition-like transformation, anoikis resistance, and metastasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2009, 29: 3722-3737. 10.1128/MCB.01164-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y, He Y, Ding J, Wu K, Hu B, Liu Y, Wu Y, Guo B, Shen Y, Landi D, Landi S, Zhou Y, Liu H: An insertion/deletion polymorphism at miRNA-122-binding site in the interleukin-1alpha 3' untranslated region confers risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2009, 30: 2064-2069. 10.1093/carcin/bgp283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayr C, Bartel DP: Widespread shortening of 3'UTRs by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation activates oncogenes in cancer cells. Cell. 2009, 138: 673-684. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.016.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Nicoloso MS, Sun H, Spizzo R, Kim H, Wickramasinghe P, Shimizu M, Wojcik SE, Ferdin J, Kunej T, Xiao L, Manoukian S, Secreto G, Ravagnani F, Wang X, Radice P, Croce CM, Davuluri RV, Calin GA: Single-nucleotide polymorphisms inside microRNA target sites influence tumor susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 2789-2798. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3541.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ratner E, Lu L, Boeke M, Barnett R, Nallur S, Chin LJ, Pelletier C, Blitzblau R, Tassi R, Paranjape T, Hui P, Godwin AK, Yu H, Risch H, Rutherford T, Schwartz P, Santin A, Matloff E, Zelterman D, Slack FJ, Weidhaas JB: A KRAS-Variant in Ovarian Cancer Acts as a Genetic Marker of Cancer Risk. Cancer Res. 2010, 70: 6509-6515. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0689.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kedde M, Strasser MJ, Boldajipour B, Oude Vrielink JAF, Slanchev K, le Sage C, Nagel R, Voorhoeve PM, van Duijse J, Ørom UA, Lund AH, Perrakis A, Raz E, Agami R: RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell. 2007, 131: 1273-1286. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimono Y, Zabala M, Cho RW, Lobo N, Dalerba P, Qian D, Diehn M, Liu H, Panula SP, Chiao E, Dirbas FM, Somlo G, Pera RAR, Lao K, Clarke MF: Down-regulation of miRNA-200c links breast cancer stem cells with normal stem cells. Cell. 2009, 138: 592-603. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wellner U, Schubert J, Burk UC, Schmalhofer O, Zhu F, Sonntag A, Waldvogel B, Vannier C, Darling D, zur Hausen A, Brunton VG, Morton J, Sansom O, Schüler J, Stemmler MP, Herzberger C, Hopt U, Keck T, Brabletz S, Brabletz T: The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2009, 11: 1487-1495. 10.1038/ncb1998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Iliopoulos D, Lindahl-Allen M, Polytarchou C, Hirsch HA, Tsichlis PN, Struhl K: Loss of miR-200 inhibition of Suz12 leads to polycomb-mediated repression required for the formation and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Mol Cell. 2010, 39: 761-772. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.013.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.