Spontaneous and therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer among BRCAmutation carriers
- Eitan Friedman1,
- Joanne Kotsopoulos2, 3,
- Jan Lubinski4,
- Henry T Lynch5,
- Parviz Ghadirian6,
- Susan L Neuhausen7,
- Claudine Isaacs8,
- Barbara Weber9,
- William D Foulkes10,
- Pal Moller11,
- Barry Rosen12,
- Charmaine Kim-Sing13,
- Ruth Gershoni-Baruch14,
- Peter Ainsworth15,
- Mary Daly16,
- Nadine Tung17,
- Andrea Eisen18,
- Olufunmilayo I Olopade19,
- Beth Karlan20,
- Howard M Saal21,
- Judy E Garber22,
- Gad Rennert23,
- Dawna Gilchrist24,
- Charis Eng25,
- Kenneth Offit26,
- Michael Osborne27,
- Ping Sun2,
- Steven A Narod2Email author and
- the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group
© Friedman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 27 September 2005
Accepted: 14 February 2006
Published: 21 March 2006
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at increased risk for developing both breast and ovarian cancer. It has been suggested that carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations may also be at increased risk of having recurrent (three or more) miscarriages. Several reproductive factors have been shown to influence the risk of breast cancer in mutation carriers, but the effects of spontaneous and therapeutic abortions on the risk of hereditary breast cancer risk have not been well studied to date.
In a matched case-control study, the frequencies of spontaneous abortions were compared among 1,878 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 950 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 657 related non-carrier controls. The rates of spontaneous and therapeutic abortions were compared for carriers with and without breast cancer.
There was no difference in the rate of spontaneous abortions between carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and non-carriers. The number of spontaneous abortions was not associated with breast cancer risk among BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. However, BRCA2 carriers who had two or more therapeutic abortions faced a 64% decrease in the risk of breast cancer (odds ratio = 0.36; 95% confidence interval 0.16–0.83; p = 0.02).
Carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is not a risk factor for spontaneous abortions and spontaneous abortions do not appear to influence the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. However, having two or more therapeutic abortions may be associated with a lowered risk of breast cancer among BRCA2 carriers.
Germline mutations in BRCA1 (MIM # 113705) and BRCA2 (MIM # 600185) are estimated to account for about 80% of breast/ovarian cancer families and 20% to 50% of site-specific breast cancer families [1–3]. Mutation carriers face substantially increased risks of developing both breast and ovarian cancer; the lifetime risk for developing breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers is estimated to be 40% to 85% (4 to 7-fold greater risk than the general population) and for ovarian cancer to be 16% to 64% (a 30-fold increase) [3–5]. Reproductive factors have been shown to modify the risk of breast cancer risk in both mutation carriers  and the general population [7, 8]. However, the relationships between induced or spontaneous abortions and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers have not been well studied. A recent study from Israel suggested that BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might be at increased risk for recurrent spontaneous abortions, compared to non-carrier controls ; however, this study was relatively small. To date, there has been no published large-scale analysis of the possible effect of being a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carrier on the rate of spontaneous abortions. The dual aims of this study were: to assess the effect of being a carrier of a germ-line BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation on the risk of spontaneous abortion; and to investigate whether or not there is an association between spontaneous or therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Materials and methods
Eligible study subjects included living women who were identified at one of 55 participating centers in 8 countries. These women were participants in ongoing clinical research protocols at the host institutions. All study subjects (with the exception of those from the University of Utah) received counseling, provided written informed consent for genetic testing and completed a questionnaire that asked for all relevant information regarding family history, reproductive and medical histories, and selected lifestyle factors, including smoking and the use of oral contraceptives. Questionnaires were administered at the individual centers at the time of a clinic appointment or at their home at a later date. Questions addressing fertility history included 'have you ever been pregnant' (yes/no); and the outcome of each pregnancy (for instance, spontaneous abortion, therapeutic abortion, still born, or live born).
The institutional review boards of the host institutions approved the study. In most cases, testing was initially offered to women who had been affected with breast or ovarian cancer. When a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was identified in a proband or relative, genetic testing was offered to other at-risk women in the family. Mutation detection was performed using a range of techniques, but all nucleotide sequences were confirmed by direct sequencing of DNA. A woman was eligible for the current study when the molecular analysis established that she was a carrier of a deleterious mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. Most (>95%) of the mutations identified in the study subjects were nonsense mutations, deletions, insertions, or small frameshifts, and clearly considered deleterious and pathogenic.
The aim of the first part of the study was to examine whether the presence of a BRCA mutation influences the rate of spontaneous abortions. Non-carrier controls were women who underwent genetic testing and were found not to be carriers of a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. These women were from families where a mutation had previously been identified, who underwent genetic testing at the Centre for Research in Women's Health in Toronto and were found not to carry the family mutation. Since information was not available for European or Israeli controls, we limited this analysis to Canadian and American women (carriers and non-carriers) who had at least one pregnancy and from centers that provided information on all pregnancies, including therapeutic and spontaneous abortions. Potential subjects were excluded if information regarding pregnancy or the number of spontaneous abortions was missing. Women who had experienced ovarian cancer prior to breast cancer were also excluded. After exclusion, a total of 3,503 women were available for this part of the study, including 1,878 BRCA1 mutation carriers, 950 BRCA2 mutation carriers, 18 women with mutations in both genes, and 657 non-carrier controls.
Second, we examined whether there is an association between spontaneous or therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. There was information on cancer history and mutation carrier status for a total of 6,993 women from 55 participating centers who carried a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Potential case subjects were selected from among the study subjects with a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. Control subjects were women who never had breast cancer and who were carriers of a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. This study was limited to parous women; therefore, potential subjects were excluded if the women were nulliparous or information on pregnancy was missing (923 women). Not all centers provided data on spontaneous abortions, and data regarding spontaneous abortions was missing for 1,230 women. Potential subjects were excluded if they had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer prior to breast cancer (57 women), if information about ovarian cancer was missing (2 women), if information regarding preventive surgery (bilateral mastectomy or oophorectomy) was missing (109 women), or if information regarding the date of interview was missing (5 women). After exclusions, a total of 4,669 women were eligible, including 2,281 women with breast cancer (potential cases) and 2,388 women without breast cancer (potential controls).
The Student's t test was used to compare the number of spontaneous abortions between carriers and non-carriers. The carrier group was divided into BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. This analysis was restricted to carriers and non-carriers from North America.
A matched case-control analysis was carried out to test for a possible association between a spontaneous or therapeutic abortion and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. A single BRCA mutation carrier (case) was selected for each unaffected subject (control), matched according to mutation in the same gene (BRCA1 or BRCA2), year of birth (within one year), and country of residence. A diagnosis of ovarian or other form of cancer in the control had to be after the year of diagnosis of the matched case subject. In addition, the date of interview of the controls, age of protective bilateral oophorectomy or age of bilateral mastectomy of the control subject was required to be after the date of breast cancer diagnosis of the matched case subject. A total of 1,694 matched case-control pairs were generated for the analysis, including 1,313 pairs with BRCA1 mutations, 380 pairs with BRCA2 mutations, and one pair with both mutations. The multivariate odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and tests for linear trend were estimated by use of conditional logistic regression. A multivariate analysis was carried out to control for the potential confounding effects of age at menarche (years), parity (0, 1, 2, 3, 4+), age of first birth (years), oophorectomy (yes/no), and oral contraceptive use (ever/never). The chi square test was used to test for differences in categorical variables. All statistical tests were two-sided. All analyses were performed using the SAS statistical package, version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).
Part 1: BRCAmutations, parity and spontaneous abortions
Comparison of spontaneous abortions among BRCA mutation carriers and non-carriers
Year of birth (mean)
Number of full-term pregnancies
Number of spontaneous abortions
Comparison of spontaneous abortions among Jewish BRCA mutation carriers (n = 795) and non-carriers (n = 110)
Year of birth (mean)
Number of full-term pregnancies
Number of spontaneous abortions
Part 2: Spontaneous and therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer in BRCAmutation carriers
Comparison of case and control subjects with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutationsa
Case subjects (N = 1,694)
Control subjects (N = 1,694)
Current age (mean)
Year of birth (mean year)
Mutation, N (%)
Country of residence, N (%)
Canada (excluding Quebec)
Oral contraceptive use, N (%)
Age at menarche, mean
Spontaneous abortions among affected and unaffected BRCA mutation carriers
Number of spontaneous abortions
OR (95% CI)
Therapeutic abortions among affected and unaffected BRCA mutation carriers
Number of therapeutic abortions
Therapeutic and spontaneous abortions among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers
OR (95% CI)
Several epidemiological studies have reported that induced or spontaneous abortions are risk factors for breast cancer in the general population [10, 11]. However, a collaborative analysis of data from 53 studies, encompassing 83,000 women from 16 countries, concluded that pregnancies that ended in spontaneous or induced abortion did not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer . Similar results were obtained subsequently from a study of African-American women  and from a prospective study of young women . However, these studies focused on women from the general population, and did not specifically address subgroups of high-risk women. Thus, the results cannot be directly extrapolated to women with a genetic predisposition.
In a previous study of miscarriages among Israeli Jewish women, 4.4% of 343 BRCA mutation carriers and 3% of 400 non-carriers reported 3 or more spontaneous abortions . These rates of recurrent abortions are similar to those found in the present study. We also found a higher frequency of recurrent abortions among Jewish BRCA2 carriers compared to Jewish non-carrier controls (4.3% versus 0%; p = 0.03), but the sample of Jewish controls was small. It is widely held that homozygous carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations are non-viable, and it might, therefore, be expected that 25% of conceptions arising from marriages between carriers of mutations in the same gene would end in miscarriage. However, the frequency of marriages between carriers is expected to be low and this phenomenon is unlikely to contribute significantly to the overall miscarriage rate. Furthermore, it is not known at what gestational age the homozygous fetus is likely to miscarry, and if this is an early phenomenon it may be unnoticed. Assuming that 1% of Ashkenazi individuals carry a BRCA1 mutation, and if they marry among Ashkenazis at random, then 2.5 per 1,000 of the offspring of carrier women should be homozygous. Given that the proportion of pregnancies that ended in miscarriages among the Jewish women in our study was 15%, or 150 per 1,000, we would expect only 2% of miscarriages among the offspring of carrier women to be due to the excess of homozygote conceptions. The proportion in non-Ashkenazi carriers would be much less.
The results of the second part of the study demonstrate that spontaneous abortions do not influence the risk of breast cancer among women with either a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. However, ever having had a therapeutic abortion was associated with a 26% reduction in risk among BRCA2 mutation carriers. Two or more therapeutic abortions resulted in a 64% decrease in breast cancer risk (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.16–0.83; p = 0.02). We observed no association between therapeutic abortions and risk among women with a BRCA1 mutation (OR for 2 or more therapeutic abortions = 1.00; 95% CI 0.68–1.47). Furthermore, we also found that combined spontaneous and therapeutic abortions conferred protection against BRCA2 breast cancers. The results from this study suggest a reduction in the risk of breast cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers with a history of interrupted pregnancies. However, the number of BRCA2 mutation carriers was relatively small.
Although ours is a large study, there are several potential limitations that must be considered. Our carrier population is composed of women who seek genetic testing and these women may differ systematically from women in the general population, in terms of demographic features and reproductive histories. For example, it has been shown that women with children are more likely to seek testing than women without children . However, this is likely to be due to a woman's concern for passing down the mutation to her children, and it is not clear that this is also the case for spontaneous or induced abortions.
Secondly, this is a case-control study and women with and without breast cancer were asked to report on their past histories of spontaneous and induced abortions. Women without breast cancer may be more reluctant to disclose a previous induced abortion than women with breast cancer. For this reason, prospective studies are believed to be more reliable than case-control studies for studying the effect of induced abortions. Recently, the Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer  published breast cancer relative risk estimates for both spontaneous and induced abortions, derived from multiple studies. The estimates for spontaneous abortion on breast cancer relative risk were 0.98 from both retrospective and prospective studies. However, the estimate of the effect of an induced abortion on breast cancer relative risk was greater for case-control studies (OR = 1.11) than for retrospective studies (OR = 0.93) attesting to the likelihood of recall bias. Both estimates, however, were very close to unity. Furthermore, in our study we observed a protective effect of induced abortions on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 (but not in BRCA1 carriers) and the direction of the observed effect is opposite to that which we would expect from recall bias.
Various reproductive factors have been shown to exert different effects on the risk of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers [15, 16]. Recently, Cullinane and colleagues  reported that increasing parity was a significant risk factor among BRCA2 mutation carriers but was protective among BRCA1 mutation carriers. The authors found a 50% increased risk of breast cancer among women with a BRCA2 mutation who had 2 or more children (OR 1.53; 95% CI = 1.01 to 2.32; p = 0.05). These results and those of the present study suggest that the hormonal and/or developmental changes of a short-term pregnancy confer protection against breast cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers, whereas those of a full-term pregnancy will increase the risk of breast cancer. Jernstrom and colleagues  reported that breast-feeding was protective among BRCA1 mutation carriers but not among BRCA2 mutation carriers. The risk factors for BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancers appear to be different. It is important, therefore, that specific risk profiles be developed for carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 that can be used by genetic counselors when discussing preventive strategies.
We found that miscarriages and therapeutic abortions do not influence the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 carriers. The possibility of a protective effect of a therapeutic (and possibly spontaneous) abortion among women with a BRCA2 mutation requires further investigation.
This work was supported by a Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance grant. Dr Steven Narod is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. We wish to thank Anna Tulman and Nicole Phillips for their research assistance. Other members of the Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group: Jane McLennan, David Fishman, Sofia Merajver, Wendy McKinnon, Marie Wood, Albert Chudley, Ellen Warner, Jeffrey Weitzel, Gareth Evans, Edmond Lemire, Hakkan Olsson, Wendy Meschino, Diane Provencher, Gordon Mills, Boris Pasche, Taya Fallen, Barbara Pasini, Cristina Bellati, Fergus Couch, Teresa Wagner, Linda Kipper, Patricia Steele.
- Narod SA, Ford D, Devilee P, Barkardottir RB, Lynch HT, Smith SA, Ponder BA, Weber BL, Garber JE, Birch JM: An evaluation of genetic heterogeneity in 145 breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 56: 254-264.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Narod S, Ford D, Devilee P, Barkardottir RB, Eyfjord J, Lenoir G, Serova O, Easton D, Goldgar D: Genetic heterogeneity of breast-ovarian cancer revisited. Am J Hum Genet. 1995, 57: 957-958.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, et al: Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 62: 676-689. 10.1086/301749.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, et al: Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003, 72: 1117-1130. 10.1086/375033.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, Pasini , et al: Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: a combined analysis of 22 population-based studies. J Med Genet. 2005, 42: 602-603. 10.1136/jmg.2004.024133.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Narod SA: Modifiers of risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 113-123. 10.1038/nrc726.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clavel-Chapelon F, Gerber M: Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk. Do they differ according to age at diagnosis?. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002, 72: 107-115. 10.1023/A:1014891216621.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zografos GC, Panou M, Panou N: Common risk factors of breast and ovarian cancer: recent view. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004, 14: 721-740. 10.1111/j.1048-891X.2004.14503.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gal I, Sadetzki S, Gershoni-Beruch R, Oberman B, Carp H, Papa MZ, Diestelman-Menachem T, Eisenberg-Barzilai S, Friedman E: Offspring gender ratio and the rate of recurrent spontaneous miscarriages in Jewish Women in high risk for breast/ovarian cancer. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74: 1270-5. 10.1086/421442.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Daling JR, Malone KE, Voigt LF, White E, Weiss NS: Risk of breast cancer among young women: relationship to induced abortion. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994, 86 (21): 1569-1570. 10.1002/ijc.21273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Longnecker MP, Mittendorf R, Greenberg ER, Willett WC: Pregnancy termination in relation to risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 1996, 275: 321-322. 10.1001/jama.275.4.283.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beral V, Bull D, Doll R, Peto R, Reeves G, Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer: Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83,000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1007-1016. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15835-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmer JR, Wise LA, Adams-Campbell LL, Rosenberg L: A prospective study of induced abortion and breast cancer in African-American women. Cancer Causes Control. 2004, 15: 105-111. 10.1023/B:CACO.0000019484.29558.f7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahue-Giangreco M, Ursin G, Sullivan-Halley J, Bernstein L: Induced abortion, miscarriage, and breast cancer risk of young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003, 12: 209-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jernstrom H, Lubinksi J, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P, Neuhausen S, Isaacs C, Weber BL, Horsman D, Rosen B, Foulkes WD, et al: Breast-feeding and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96: 1094-1098.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cullinane CA, Lubinski J, Neuhausen SL, Ghadirian P, Lynch HT, Isaacs C, Moller P, Offit K, Kim-Sing C, Friedman E, et al: Effect of pregnancy as a risk factor for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer. 2005, 117: 988-991. 10.1002/ijc.21273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.