Skip to main content

Table 2 Rescreening rates by breast density notification status and the corresponding odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) stratified by age group and screening round

From: The impact of breast density notification on rescreening rates within a population-based mammographic screening program

Age

Proportion of screening events relating to women notified as dense who rescreened

Proportion of screening events relating to women not notified who rescreened

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

Multivariable adjusteda OR (95% CI)

First screeners

    

Younger age

7657/15,032 (50.9%)

21,629/40,986 (52.8%)

0.93 (0.90–0.96)

0.89 (0.86–0.93)

Targeted age

7220/12,498 (57.8%)

33,569/59,866 (56.1%)

1.07 (1.03–1.11)

1.04 (1.01–1.09)

Older age

29/124 (23.4%)

372/1651 (22.5%)

1.05 (0.68–1.62)

0.99 (0.64–1.54)

Second screeners

    

Younger age

5964/8993 (66.3%)

17,801/26,277 (67.7%)

0.94 (0.89, 0.99)

0.91 (0.87, 0.96)

Targeted age

8313/12,600 (66.0%)

44,470/68,720 (64.7%)

1.05 (1.01–1.09)

1.03 (0.99–1.07)

Older age

50/165 (30.3%)

530/1859 (28.5%)

1.09 (0.77–1.54)

1.07 (0.75–1.52)

Third and subsequent screeners

    

Younger age

7325/9404 (77.9%)

24,492/30,596 (80.0%)

0.88 (0.82, 0.93)

0.84 (0.79, 0.90)

Targeted age

58,022/73,027 (79.5%)

430,847/542,866 (79.4%)

0.99 (0.96–1.01)

0.98 (0.95–1.00)

Older age

2273/5479 (41.5%)

29,567/71,562 (41.3%)

0.97 (0.91–1.05)

0.99 (0.92–1.07)

  1. aThe multivariable logistic regression model includes breast density notification status, family history, disability status, Aboriginal status, country of birth, English is spoken at home (yes/no), ARIA and SEIFA