Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics

From: Comparative effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone for HR+/HER2− metastatic breast cancer in US real-world clinical practice

 

Unadjusted total cohort

Cohort after sIPTW

Characteristic

Palbociclib + letrozole (n = 772)

Letrozole (n = 658)

Standardized difference

Palbociclib + letrozole (n = 839)

Letrozole (n = 698)

Standardized difference

Age, y

 Mean (SD)

65.2 (10.4)

69.2 (10.9)

− 0.3793

66.8 (11.2)

67.1 (11.1)

− 0.0288

 Median (IQR)

66.0 (58.0–73.0)

70.0 (61.0–79.0)

 

67.0 (59.0–75.0)

68.0 (60.0–76.0)

 

Age group*, n (%), y

 18–49

52 (6.7)

30 (4.6)

0.0944

48 (5.8)

38 (5.5)

0.0114

 50–64

304 (39.4)

187 (28.4)

0.2331

288 (34.3)

244 (35.0)

− 0.0131

 65–74

262 (33.9)

193 (29.3)

0.0992

265 (31.6)

221 (31.7)

− 0.0025

  ≥ 75

154 (19.9)

248 (37.7)

− 0.3995

237 (28.3)

194 (27.8)

0.0107

Race/ethnicity*, n (%)

 White

525 (68.0)

446 (67.8)

0.0048

572 (68.1)

470 (67.4)

0.0163

 Black

54 (7.0)

60 (9.1)

− 0.0781

62 (7.4)

55 (7.9)

− 0.0187

 Asian

13 (1.7)

10 (1.5)

0.0131

15 (1.7)

11 (1.5)

0.0180

 Hispanic or Latino

22 (2.8)

15 (2.3)

0.0361

23 (2.7)

16 (2.3)

0.0264

 Not documented

158 (20.5)

127 (19.3)

0.0292

167 (20.0)

146 (20.9)

− 0.0225

Practice type*, n (%)

 Academic

46 (6.0)

31 (4.7)

0.0555

44 (5.2)

36 (5.2)

0.0010

 Community

726 (94.0)

627 (95.3)

 

795 (94.8)

661 (94.8)

 

Disease stage at initial diagnosis*, n (%)

 I

82 (10.6)

79 (12.0)

− 0.0437

90 (10.8)

78 (11.2)

− 0.0127

 II

187 (24.2)

149 (22.6)

0.0373

198 (23.6)

161 (23.1)

0.0129

 III

109 (14.1)

97 (14.7)

− 0.0177

121 (14.4)

101 (14.4)

− 0.0017

 IV

321 (41.6)

254 (38.6)

0.0608

338 (40.3)

283 (40.6)

− 0.0062

 Not documented

73 (9.5)

79 (12.0)

− 0.0825

91 (10.9)

74 (10.7)

0.0069

ECOG PS*, n (%)

 0

293 (38.0)

167 (25.4)

0.2728

271 (32.3)

227 (32.5)

− 0.0059

 1

159 (20.6)

134 (20.4)

0.0057

175 (20.9)

144 (20.7)

0.0055

 2, 3, or 4

49 (6.3)

84 (12.8)

− 0.2196

82 (9.7)

66 (9.5)

0.0095

 Not documented

271 (35.1)

273 (41.5)

− 0.1316

311 (37.1)

260 (37.3)

− 0.0047

Visceral disease*,‡, n (%)

 No

442 (57.3)

437 (66.4)

 

518 (61.8)

429 (61.5)

 

 Yes

330 (42.7)

221 (33.6)

0.1894

320 (38.2)

269 (38.5)

− 0.0060

Bone-only disease*, n (%)

 No

501 (64.9)

398 (60.5)

 

530 (63.1)

440 (63.1)

 

 Yes

271 (35.1)

260 (39.5)

− 0.0913

309 (36.9)

258 (36.9)

− 0.0011

Brain metastases, n (%)

 No

753 (97.5)

628 (95.4)

 

820 (97.7)

656 (94.0)

 

 Yes

19 (2.5)

30 (4.6)

− 0.1142

19 (2.3)

42 (6.0)

− 0.1901

Time from initial Dx to metastatic Dx*, n (%), y

 De novo

321 (41.6)

254 (38.6)

0.0608

338 (40.3)

283 (40.6)

− 0.0062

 ≤ 1

19 (2.5)

23 (3.5)

− 0.0609

25 (2.9)

21 (3.1)

− 0.0070

 > 1–5

123 (15.9)

111 (16.9)

− 0.0253

133 (15.9)

111 (16.0)

− 0.0016

 > 5

308 (39.9)

269 (40.9)

− 0.0201

342 (40.7)

281 (40.3)

0.0097

 Not documented

1 (0.1)

1 (0.2)

− 0.0060

1 (0.1)

1 (0.1)

0.0010

Number of metastatic sites*, n (%)

 1

372 (48.2)

365 (55.5)

− 0.1462

423 (50.4)

355 (50.9)

− 0.0104

 2

220 (28.5)

147 (22.3)

0.1418

217 (25.9)

183 (26.2)

− 0.0070

 3

110 (14.2)

64 (9.7)

0.1396

101 (12.0)

86 (12.4)

− 0.0104

 4

40 (5.2)

18 (2.7)

0.1257

35 (4.2)

27 (3.8)

0.0184

 ≥ 5

20 (2.6)

10 (1.5)

0.0755

18 (2.2)

15 (2.2)

0.0002

 Not documented

10 (1.3)

54 (8.2)

−0.3293

44 (5.3)

31 (4.5)

0.0371

  1. The balance in important prognostic baseline characteristics was assessed using a standardized difference approach, with a standardized difference of ≥ 0.10 considered indicative of practical significance [24]. The total patient population for different subgroups varied due to the application of sIPTW. Therefore, the total n number for each subgroup may not have always equaled the N number of the treatment arm (due to rounding error and categorization differences). Calculated percentages were based on the number of patients reported within each subgroup
  2. Dx diagnosis, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, IQR interquartile range, sIPTW stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting
  3. *Variable used in the propensity score matching model; de novo vs not de novo were used as categories for initial Dx to metastatic Dx
  4. Race data were not known in the “not documented” race group
  5. Visceral disease was defined as metastatic disease in the lung and/or liver; patients could have had other sites of metastases. No visceral disease was defined as no lung or liver metastases
  6. §Bone-only disease was defined as metastatic disease in the bone only
  7. ǁMultiple metastases at the same site were counted as 1 site (e.g., if a patient had 3 bone metastases in the spine, it was considered only 1 site)