Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient characteristics and clinicopathological variables of the study cohorts

From: Molecular analyses of triple-negative breast cancer in the young and elderly

 

All patients

Patients < 40 years

Patients 40–50 years

Patients 50–60 years

Patients 60–70 years

Patients 70–80 years

Patients ≥ 80 years

Statistical difference between age groupsE

N

237

28

24

55

53

40

37

 

ER IHC % (1–10%) A

12.3%

10.7%

16.7%

9.3%

15.1%

10.3%

13.5%

p = 1.0

Tumor size > 20 mm

49.4%

46.4%

37.5%

40.0%

50.9%

42.5%

78.4%

p = 0.09

Grade 3 (%)

87.9%

96.3%

100%

94.3%

78.4%

80%

86.5%

p = 0.29

Median Ki67%

70

87

78

70

70

58

60

 

Node positive (%)

34.6%

37.0%

29.2%

32.1%

34.0%

37.5%

37.8%

p = 1.0

Adjuvant chemotherapy (%)

72.8%

100%

100%

94.5%

84.9%

59.0%

0%

p = 4e−15

Outcome

 Death events (%)

26.6%

17.9%

0%

12.7%

32.1%

27.5%

62.2%

p = 3e−6

 IDFS events (%)

32.5%

25.0%

12.5%

16.4%

39.6%

35.0%

62.2%

p = 0.0007

 Distant metastases (%)

20.7%

21.4%

8.3%

14.5%

28.3%

20.0%

27.0%

p = 1.0

BRCA1-germline (%) B

8.0%

28.6%

4.2%

12.7%

1.9%

5.0%

0%

p = 0.003

BRCA1 status

BRCA1-null C (%)

10.5%

32.1%

4.2%

16.4%

7.5%

5.0%

0%

p = 0.006

BRCA1 hypermethylation (%)

24.1%

50.0%

41.7%

21.8%

28.3%

10.0%

5.4%

p = 0.001

BRCA1 wildtype D

65.4%

17.9%

54.1%

61.8%

64.2%

85%

94.6%

p = 2e−8

HRD status

       

p = 1e−6

 HRDetect-high (%)

58.6%

92.9%

83.3′%

67.3%

60.4%

27.5%

35.1%

 HRDetect-intermediate (%)

5.5%

0%

4.2%

5.5%

1.9%

5.0%

16.2%

 HRDetect-low (%)

35.9%

7.1%

12.5%

27.3%

37.7%

67.5%

48.6%

 PD-L1 positivity (%)

51.8%

65.4%

54.5%

62.7%

46.0%

40.0%

44.1%

p = 1.0

TILs (%)

       

p = 1.0

 < 30%

61.5%

46.2%

40.9%

51.0%

73.5%

76.5%

69.7%

 30–50%

17.8%

19.2%

31.8%

24.5%

10.2%

11.8%

15.2%

 > 50%

20.7%

34.6%

27.3%

24.5%

16.3%

11.8%

15.2%

PAM50 subtypes (%)

       

p = 0.001

 Basal-like

79.9%

100%

95.7%

94.3%

73.5%

57.1%

63.9%

 HER2-enriched

14.7%

0%

4.3%

1.9%

16.3%

28.6%

36.1%

 Luminal A

1.3%

0%

0%

0%

2.0%

5.7%

0%

 Luminal B

0.4%

0%

0%

0%

0%

2.9%

0%

 Normal-like

3.6%

0%

0%

3.8%

8.2%

5.7%

0%

TNBC subtypes (%)

       

p = 0.22

 BL1

20.2%

14.3%

26.1%

26.4%

20.4%

14.7%

16.7%

 BL2

9.9%

10.7%

8.7%

11.3%

10.2%

5.9%

11.1%

 IM

20.2%

25.0%

21.7%

28.3%

14.3%

17.6%

13.9%

 LAR

13.0%

0%

0%

3.8%

16.3%

23.5%

30.6%

 M

18.4%

17.9%

21.7%

18.9%

20.4%

8.8%

22.2%

 MSL

6.3%

7.1%

13.0%

1.9%

4.1%

17.6%

0%

 UNS

12.1%

25.0%

8.7%

9.4%

14.3%

11.8%

5.6%

IntClust10 subtypes

       

p = 0.07

 1

0.9%

0%

4.3%

0%

0%

0%

2.8%

 10

64.7%

89.3%

87.0%

79.2%

57.1%

40.0%

44.4%

 3

2.2%

0%

4.3%

1.9%

2.0%

5.7%

0%

 4

25.0%

3.6%

4.3%

17.0%

30.6%

40.0%

44.4%

 5

0.9%

0%

0%

0%

2.0%

2.9%

0%

 8

0.4%

0%

0%

0%

0%

2.9%

0%

 9

5.8%

7.1.%

0%

1.9%

8.2%

8.6%

8.3%

  1. Proportions calculated excluding missing data. Groups are defined as, e.g., ≥ 40 and < 50
  2. AProportion of cases with an ER IHC staining of 1–10%, which is classified as ER-negative in Sweden
  3. BGermline alteration according to WGS analysis
  4. CBRCA1-null: germline and/or biallelic inactivation of BRCA1 determined by WGS
  5. DPatients that are not defined as BRCA1-null or show somatic BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation based on available data for the study
  6. EChi-square test, with multiple testing correction by Bonferroni adjustment (n = 18 tests)