Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of patient cohorts used to assess prognostic significance of EMAT subtypes

From: Superior breast cancer metastasis risk stratification using an epithelial-mesenchymal-amoeboid transition gene signature

Factor

METABRIC (n = 562)

No. (%)

GSE11121 (n = 200)

No. (%)

NKI295 (n = 151)

No. (%)

Age, years

 < 50

20.8

23.2

84.1

 > 50

78.8

76.8

15.9

 Unknown

0.4

100

 

Tumor size, cm

 < 2

39.5

49.5

54.3

 2–5

57.7

49

45.7

 > 5

2.3

1.5

 

 Unknown

0.5

0

0

Tumor grade

 Low

8.5

14.5

22.5

 Intermediate

42.3

68

30.5

 High

42.3

17.5

47.0

 Unknown

6.8

0

0

ER

 Negative

17.3

23.2

27.8

 Positive

78.8

76.8

72.2

 Unknown

3.9

0

0

PR

 Negative

43.8

41.8

 

 Positive

56.2

58.2

 

 Unknown

0

0

100

HER2

 Negative

80.2

89.0

 

 Positive

19.4

0.11

 

 Unknown

0.4

0

100

Adjuvant therapy

 Chemotherapy

7.1

N/A

4.0

 Hormonal therapy

47.9

N/A

4.0

 Radiation therapy

54.4

N/A

40.4

PAM50 status

 Luminal A

44.1

27

31.8

 Luminal B

19.9

23.5

25.2

 HER2

7.5

12.5

16.6

 Basal-like

15.3

17.5

18.5

 Normal-like

13

18

7.9

EMAT status

 EMAT1

19.4

22.5

17.2

 EMAT2

45.7

31

35.1

 EMAT3

26

29.5

27.8

 EMAT4

8.9

17

19.9

  1. ER estrogen receptor, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, PR progesterone receptor