Skip to main content

Table 9 Summary of recent published studies of PD-L1 expression in breast cancer using FDA-approved clones

From: Comparison of three scoring methods using the FDA-approved 22C3 immunohistochemistry assay to evaluate PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and their association with clinicopathologic factors

Reference

No., type of breast tumors

Clones

Pathologic material

Cutoffs for positive/high staining

Correlation with prognosis

He et al. [16]

68, IBC, post NACT

28–8

TMA

TC > 1%

Worse prognosis

Humphries et al. [17]

≥ 109, various types

SP142

TMA

> 1%, epithelial and lymphoid cells

Better prognosis

Karnik et al. [18]

136, ductal (primary and metastasis)

22C3, SP263

WSS (biopsies and resections)

TC ≥ 1%

Not performed

Li et al. [19]

191, HER2 positive, no NACT

22C3, 28–8

TMA

TC ≥ 1%; IC, cutoff not defined

Better prognosis

Pelekanou et al. [20]

163, HER2 negative, locally advanced, or IBC (120, pretreatment; 43, post NACT)

22C3

WSS

Either tumor or stromal cells ≥ 1%

Not associated (but better pCR)

Downes et al. [21]

30, not specified

22C3, SP142, SP263

TMA

22C3: CPS ≥ 1; SP142: IC ≥ 1%; SP263: cutoff not defined

Not performed

Noske et al. [22]

1318, various types, all node-positive

SP263

TMA

TC ≥ 1%; IC ≥ 1%

Not associated

Van Berckelaer et al. [23]

349 (207, pretreatment IBC; 142, non-IBC)

SP142

WSS (biopsies)

TC, IC (categorized based on %)

Not associated (but better pCR)

  1. IBC inflammatory carcinoma, NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy, TC tumor cell, IC immune cell, CPS combined positive score, TMA tissue microarray, WSS whole slide section, pCR pathologic complete response