Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 4 Average BC distance between the top feature sets identified by four different feature ranking methods for each of the five classification tasks (Experiment 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, and 2B) across 100 iterations of cross validation

From: Quantitative nuclear histomorphometric features are predictive of Oncotype DX risk categories in ductal carcinoma in situ: preliminary findings

Feature ranking methods High vs. low High vs. intermediate Intermediate vs. low High + intermediate vs. low High vs. low + intermediate
Covariance 0.50 0.62 0.45 0.38 0.47
WRST 0.48 0.55 0.41 0.38 0.47
MRMR-mid 0.47 0.54 0.40 0.36 0.45
MRMR-miq 0.49 0.63 0.42 0.37 0.48