Skip to main content

Table 5 Rates of misclassified cases for pairwise comparisons (training and validation dataset)

From: Radiomic signatures with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes: initial results

  Luminal A (n = 66) Luminal B (n = 25) TN (n = 41) All others (n = 118)
Luminal A (n = 66) Lum A vs. B:
F, 9/8 (13.6/30.8%)
MI, 12/13 (18.2/52%)
Luminal B (n = 25) Lum A vs. B:
F, 9/8 (13.6/30.8%)
MI, 12/13 (18.2/52%)
Lum B vs. TN:
F, 8/8 (32/19.5%)
Lum B vs. others:
F, 17/19 (68/16.1%)
POE, 17/18 (68/15.3%)
MI, 12/14 (48/11.9%)
TN (n = 41) Lum B vs. TN:
F, 8/8 (32/19.5%)
All others (n = 118) Lum B vs. others:
F, 17/19 (68/16.1%)
POE, 17/18 (68/15.3%)
MI, 12/14 (48/11.9%)
  1. F Fisher, MI mutual information, POE probability of error and average correlation, TN triple negative