Skip to main content

Table 5 Rates of misclassified cases for pairwise comparisons (training and validation dataset)

From: Radiomic signatures with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of breast cancer receptor status and molecular subtypes: initial results

 

Luminal A (n = 66)

Luminal B (n = 25)

TN (n = 41)

All others (n = 118)

Luminal A (n = 66)

–

Lum A vs. B:

F, 9/8 (13.6/30.8%)

MI, 12/13 (18.2/52%)

–

–

Luminal B (n = 25)

Lum A vs. B:

F, 9/8 (13.6/30.8%)

MI, 12/13 (18.2/52%)

–

Lum B vs. TN:

F, 8/8 (32/19.5%)

Lum B vs. others:

F, 17/19 (68/16.1%)

POE, 17/18 (68/15.3%)

MI, 12/14 (48/11.9%)

TN (n = 41)

–

Lum B vs. TN:

F, 8/8 (32/19.5%)

–

–

All others (n = 118)

–

Lum B vs. others:

F, 17/19 (68/16.1%)

POE, 17/18 (68/15.3%)

MI, 12/14 (48/11.9%)

–

–

  1. F Fisher, MI mutual information, POE probability of error and average correlation, TN triple negative