Skip to main content

Table 2 Cox regression hazard ratios for CTC count ≥ 5 versus < 5, and presence versus absence of CTC clusters

From: Longitudinal enumeration and cluster evaluation of circulating tumor cells improve prognostication for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer in a prospective observational trial

 

PFS

P value

OS

P value

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

Baseline

 Unadjusted

  CTC ≥ 5

1.68 (1.17–2.42)

0.005

2.52 (1.58–4.01)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

1.54 (1.00–2.40)

0.05

2.23 (1.35–3.69)

0.002

 Adjusteda

  CTC ≥ 5

2.30 (1.43–3.71)

0.001

3.92 (2.09–7.36)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

2.64 (1.46–4.78)

0.001

4.07 (1.99–8.31)

< 0.001

One monthb

 Unadjusted

  CTC ≥ 5

2.17 (1.43–3.30)

< 0.001

4.38 (2.63–7.30)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

3.23 (1.70–-6.14)

< 0.001

4.52 (2.24–9.15)

< 0.001

 Adjustedc

  CTC ≥ 5

2.30 (1.23–4.32)

0.009

4.39 (2.04–9.43)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

3.37 (1.51–7.55)

0.003

5.67 (2.30–13.95)

< 0.001

Three monthsb

 Unadjusted

  CTC ≥ 5

2.24 (1.24–4.03)

0.07

3.28 (1.76–6.12)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

3.16 (1.60–6.22)

0.001

3.35 (1.68–6.68)

0.001

 Adjustedc

  CTC ≥ 5

2.95 (1.44–6.06)

0.003

5.93 (2.62–13.42)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

3.04 (1.35–6.84)

0.007

3.55 (1.44–8.77)

0.006

Six monthsb

 Unadjusted

  CTC ≥ 5

4.33 (2.10–8.93)

< 0.001

7.74 (3.52–16.99)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

6.48 (2.26–18.56)

0.001

9.92 (3.30–29.78)

< 0.001

 Adjustedc

  CTC ≥ 5

6.43 (2.30–17.94)

< 0.001

15.72 (3.79–65.17)

< 0.001

  Clusters present

7.17 (2.03–25.36)

0.002

21.65 (5.06–92.63)

< 0.001

  1. Abbreviations: PFS progression-free survival, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio, CTC circulating tumor cell
  2. aAdjusted for the variables included in the clinicopathological model (Additional file 3)
  3. bAssessed by landmark analysis
  4. cAdjusted for the variables included in the clinicopathological model (Additional file 3) and for baseline CTC count (< 5 vs ≥ 5)