Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of Carolina Breast Cancer Study breast cancer cases or tumors evaluated or not evaluated for DNA methylation profile

From: DNA methylation profiling in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study defines cancer subclasses differing in clinicopathologic characteristics and survival

Characteristic

 

Cases evaluated for methylation

Cases not evaluated

Pvalue

(n =517)

(n =163)

N

(%)

N

(%)

Age

Mean ± SD, years

49.7 ± 11.9

52.2 ± 11.9

 
 

<50 years

318

(62)

84

(52)

0.02

 

50+ years

199

(38)

78

(48)

 

Race

      
 

White/Othera

301

(58)

106

(65)

0.12

 

African-American

216

(42)

57

(35)

 

Menopausal status

      
 

Premenopausal

275

(53)

76

(47)

0.14

 

Postmenopausal

242

(47)

87

(53)

 

Stageb

      
 

I

178

(37)

68

(45)

0.37

 

II

245

(51)

67

(44)

 
 

III

45

(9)

12

(8)

 
 

IV

13

(3)

4

(3)

 

Primary tumor size

      
 

≤2 cm

250

(50)

87

(57)

0.28

 

>2-5 cm

205

(41)

52

(34)

 
 

>5 cm

42

(9)

13

(9)

 

Lymph node status

      
 

Negative

291

(58)

101

(66)

0.11

 

Positive

207

(42)

53

(34)

 

Hormone receptor expression

      
 

ER+/PR+

250

(50)

62

(42)

0.38

 

ER+/PR-

48

(10)

17

(12)

 
 

ER-/PR+

39

(8)

15

(10)

 
 

ER-/PR-

163

(33)

53

(36)

 

Combined tumor gradec

      
 

I

126

(25)

47

(29)

0.48

 

II

156

(30)

49

(30)

 
 

II

228

(45)

65

(40)

 

Histologic type

      
 

Ductald

388

(75)

122

(75)

0.23

 

Ductal variantse

13

(3)

9

(5)

 
 

Poorly differentiatedf

22

(4)

3

(2)

 
 

Lobularg

46

(9)

13

(8)

 
 

Mixed lobular/Ductal

48

(9)

16

(10)

 

IHC intrinsic subtypeh

      
 

Luminal A

212

(51)

42

(51)

0.76

 

Luminal B

65

(16)

12

(15)

 
 

Basal-like

86

(21)

14

(17)

 
 

HER2+/HR-

26

(6)

7

(8)

 
 

Unclassified

24

(6)

7

(8)

 

p53 mutation status

      
 

Positive

218

(42)

47

(34)

0.08

 

Negative

297

(58)

91

(66)

 
  1. aThe white/other cases evaluated included 291 Caucasians, 3 American Indians, 6 Asians, and 1 other. bAccording to the American Joint Committee on Cancer breast tumor staging guidelines. cNottingham grade based on mitotic index, histologic grade, and nuclear grade. dDuctal not otherwise specified (n = 372), medullary (n = 3), neuroendocrine (n =2), apocrine (n = 2), and other mixed (n = 9). eDuctal variants include mucinous (n =8), papillary (n = 1), and cribriform (n = 4). fPoorly differentiated include metaplastic carcinoma (n = 6), anaplastic carcinoma (n =3), and undifferentiated high grade carcinoma (n = 13). gLobular, classic, and/or variant (n = 46). hIntrinsic subtype was determined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status determined by medical records or immunohistochemistry (IHC), and IHC staining for CK5, CK6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. HR, hormone receptor; SD, standard deviation.