Skip to main content

Table 1 Correlation coefficients for selected gene pairs in breast cancer microarray data

From: Recent translational research: microarray expression profiling of breast cancer – beyond classification and prognostic markers?

 

Data

Genes compared a

van't Veer and colleagues b (n = 98)

Sørlie and colleagues c (n = 122)

Sotiriou and colleagues d (n = 99)

West and colleagues e (n = 49)

ERBB2 and GRB7

0.910

0.745

0.633

0.887

ERBB2 and STARD3

0.791

0.705

0.828

0.895

KRT5 and KRT14

0.745

N/A f

0.546

N/A

KRT5 and KRT17

0.837

0.784

N/A

N/A

KRT8 and KRT18

0.886

N/A

0.712

0.770

ESR1 and LIV-1

0.728

0.670

0.674

N/A

ESR1 and TFF1

0.624

N/A

N/A

0.077

ESR1 and PGR

0.493 g

N/A

N/A

N/A h

ESR1 and AREG

0.500

N/A

N/A

N/A

ESR1 and TGFβ2

-0.212 i

N/A

-0.160

-0.091

ESR1 and NDRG1

-0.669

N/A

-0.015

-0.329

  1. a If more than one probe was present for a gene, the one with the highest correlation and the fewest missing data values was used. b Correlation coefficients calculated from log10 intensity ratios from van't Veer and colleagues [11]. The 78 sporadic tumors and 20 BRCA1/BRCA2 tumors were used to compute the correlations. c Correlation coefficients calculated from log2 intensity ratios from Sørlie and colleagues [4]. d Correlation coefficients calculated from log2 intensity ratios from Sotiriou and colleagues [5]. e Correlation coefficients calculated from intensity values from West and colleagues [3]. The R 2 value for the plot of ERBB2 and GRB7 in Fig. 2a is based on log10(intensity). f N/A, data for one or both the two genes not included in the publicly distributed data set. g The strength of the positive correlation is reduced by the wide range of values for the progesterone receptor (PGR) in the strong estrogen receptor message (ESR1) subgroup (Fig. 5c). h PGR values for 39 of 49 samples were negative. i The strength of the negative correlation is reduced by the wide range of values for TGFβ2 in the weak ESR1 subgroup (Fig. 5e).