|
Reader
|
MX ± US better
|
MX ± US slightly better
|
Similar
|
MX ± CEDM slightly better
|
MX ± CEDM better
|
|---|
|
1
|
6 (5)
|
10 (9)
|
39 (35)
|
24 (22)
|
31 (28)
|
|
2
|
11 (10)
|
15 (14)
|
51 (46)
|
16 (15)
|
17 (15)
|
|
3
|
3 (3)
|
20 (18)
|
56 (51)
|
25 (23)
|
6 (5)
|
|
4
|
5 (5)
|
10 (9)
|
47 (43)
|
26 (24)
|
22 (20)
|
|
5
|
19 (17)
|
10 (9)
|
45 (41)
|
25 (23)
|
11 (10)
|
|
6
|
8 (7)
|
12 (11)
|
48 (44)
|
24 (22)
|
18 (16)
|
|
Overall
|
8.7 (7.9)
|
12.8 (11.7)
|
47.7 (43.3)
|
23.3 (21.2)
|
17.5 (15.9)
|
|
Average MX ± CEDM similar, slightly better, or better
| |
80.5%
| |
|
95% CIa
| |
74.5% to 86.5%
| |
- Values are presented as number (percentage by row). a95% confidence interval (CI) obtained from a Student t distribution with 18.9 degrees of freedom (Hillis, 2007 [29]). BI-RADS, Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System; CEDM, contrast-enhanced digital mammography; MX, mammography; US, ultrasonography.
