From: Current approaches to the management of Her2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Phase | Drug/Regimen | Line of therapy | Number | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
II | Epirubicin 135 vs. 90 vs. 60 vs. 40 mg/m2 [31] | +/- endocrine or endocrine | 287 | RR: 37% (90 or 135) |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 8.4 (90) vs. 4.4 months (40)a |
III | Doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks vs. liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks CAELYX [32] | +/- adjuvant anthracycline | 509 | PFS: 7.8 vs. 6.9 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 22 vs. 21 months |
III | Doxorubicin 75 m/m2 every 3 weeks vs. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [30] | Prior alkylator | 326 | RR: 33% vs. 48%a |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 21 vs. 26 weeks |
 |  |  |  | OS: 14 vs. 15 months |
II | Docetaxel 40 mg/m2 every week, 6 weeks, every 8 weeks [37] | 1st/2nd line | 29 | RR: 41% |
 |  |  |  | CBR: 59 |
II | Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 every week | Prior anthracycline +/− every 3 weeks taxane | 212 | RR: 22% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 4.7 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 12.8 months |
II | Paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks vs. 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [83] | 1st/2nd line | 49 | RR: 32% vs. 21% |
III | Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks vs. paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [33] | 1st/2nd line | 449 | TTP: 5.7 vs. 3.6 monthsa |
 |  |  |  | OS: 15.4 vs. 12.7 monthsa |
III | Nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 every 3 weeks vs. paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [38] | Unlimited; no prior taxane in metastatic setting | 225 | RR: 33% vs. 19%a |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 23 vs. 16.9 weeksa |
 |  |  |  | OS: 60.5 vs. 55.7 weeks |
II | Nab-paclitaxel 300 every 3 weeks or 100 every week or 150 mg/m2 every week vs. docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [39] | 1st line | 302 | RR: 49% (150) vs. 45% (100) vs. 35% (d) |
 |  |  |  | PFS: 13 (150) vs. 7.5 months (d)a |
III | Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks vs. capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [50] | 1st/2nd line | 511 | RR: 30% vs. 42%a |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 6.1 vs. 4.2 monthsa |
 |  |  |  | OS: 14.5 vs.11.5 monthsa |
III | Paclitaxel 175 g/m2 every 3 weeks vs. paclitaxel 175 g/m2 every 3 weeks + gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 3 weeks [54] | 1st line | 529 | RR: 41% vs. 26%a |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 6.14 vs. 3.98 monthsa |
 |  |  |  | OS: 18.6 vs. 15.8 monthsa |
II | Vinorelbine 35-30 mg/m2 every week [40] | 2nd/3rd line; anthracycline +/- taxane | 40 | RR: 25% |
 |  |  |  | TTF: 6 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 6 months |
II | Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [41] | 1st line | 65 | RR: 42% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 4.8 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 22 months |
II | Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [45] | 2nd line after taxane | 49 | RR: 12% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 2.2 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 7.9 months |
II | Ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [44] | 3rd/4th line; anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine | 126 | RR: 12% |
 |  |  |  | PFS: 3.1 months |
II | Ixabepilone 6 mg/m2 per day days 1-5 every 3 weeks [43] | 1st/2nd line | 23 | RR: 57% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 5.5 months |
II | Eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 every week × 2 weeks every 3 weeks [47] | Median 4 prior | 332 | RR: 9%-14% |
 |  |  |  | PFS: 2.6 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 9 months |
III | Eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 every week × 2 weeks every 3 weeks vs. physician choice [48] | Median 4 prior | 762 | PFS: 3.7 vs. 2.2 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 13.1 vs. 10.6 monthsa |
II | Capecitabine 1,255 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 3 weeks [49] | Unlimited | 75 | RR: 26% |
 |  |  |  | OS: 12.2 months |
II | Capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks vs. | 1st/2nd line | 73 | RR: 37% vs. 35% |
 | capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks [51] |  |  | TTP: 4 vs. 4 months |
II | Capecitabine 1,255 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks vs. cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 + methotrexate 40 mg/m2 + 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [84] | 1st line | 95 | RR: 30% vs. 16% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 4.2 vs. 3 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 19.6 vs. 17.2 months |
III | Capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks vs. | 3rd line | 1,221 | RR: 29% vs. 43%a |
 | ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 every 3 weeks + capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice a day × 14 days every 3 weeks [56] |  |  | PFS: 4.2 vs. 6.2 monthsa |
 |  |  |  | OS: 15.6 vs. 16.4 months |
II | Gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 every week × 3 weeks every 4 weeks [52] | 1st line | 39 | RR: 37% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 5.1 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 21.1 months |
II | Gemcitabine 800-850 mg/m2 every week × 3 weeks every 4 weeks [85] | 1st-4th line | 81 | RR: 20%-25% |
 |  |  |  | OS: 11-11.5 months |