From: Current approaches to the management of Her2-negative metastatic breast cancer
Phase | Drug/Regimen | Line of endocrine therapy | Number (percentage of HR unknown) | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|
IIIa | Tamoxifen | 1st line | 156 premenopausal + postmenopausal (24%) | RR: 16% |
 | POA 74181/74185 [77] |  |  | TTP: 6.7 months |
 |  |  |  | 5-year PFS: 8% |
 |  |  |  | OS: 27.2 months |
III | Tamoxifen vs. BSO [10] | 1st line | 53 premenopausal (21%) | CR: 0% vs. 15% |
 |  |  |  | PR: 31% vs. 20% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 160 vs. 144 days |
 |  |  |  | OS: 749 vs. 722 days |
III | BSO/RT vs. goserelin vs. BSO/RT + tamoxifen vs. tamoxifen + goserelin [11] | 1st line | 85 perimenopausal (33%) | RR: 47% vs. 27% vs. 11% vs. 45% |
 |  |  |  | OS: 37 (ovarian) vs. 36 months (goserelin) |
III | Buserelin vs. tamoxifen vs. buserelin + tamoxifen EORTC 10881 [78] | 1st line | 161 premenopausal (52%) | RR: 34% vs. 28% vs. 48% |
 |  |  |  | PFS: 6.3 vs. 5.6 months. vs. 9.7 monthsb |
 |  |  |  | OS: 2.5 vs. 2.9 vs. 3.7 yearsb |
Meta | LHRH agonist vs. LHRH + tamoxifen [12] | 1st line | 506 premenopausal (22%) | RR: 30% vs. 39%b |
 |  |  |  | PFS HR: 0.70b |
 |  |  |  | OS HR: 0.78b |
III | Fulvestrant 500 mg every 30 days vs. fulvestrant 250 mg every 30 days | 1st/2nd line | 736 postmenopausal | RR: 9% vs. 10% |
 |  |  |  | PFS HR: 0.80b |
 | CONFIRM [15] |  |  | OS: 25.1 vs. 22.8 months |
III | Fulvestrant 250 mg every 30 days vs. tamoxifen 20 mg by mouth every day [79] | 1st line | 587 postmenopausal (20%) | RR: 33% vs. 31% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 8.2 vs. 8.3 (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive) |
 |  |  |  | OS: 39.3 vs. 40.7 months |
III | Fulvestrant vs. anastrozole | 1st line | 205 postmenopausal | CBR: 73% vs. 67% |
 | FIRST [17] |  |  | TTP: not reached vs. 12.5 monthsb |
III | Anastrozole tamoxifen vs. tamoxifen anastrozole | 1st line | 60 postmenopausal (20%) | TTP: 28.2 vs. 19.5 monthsc |
 | TARGET/SAKK 21/95 [80] |  |  | OS: 69.7 vs. 59.3 months |
III | Letrozole vs. tamoxifen | 1st line | 977 postmenopausal | TTP: 42 vs. 21 weeksb |
 | LILBCG [81] |  |  |  |
III | Exemestane vs. megestrol [23] | 1st line | 769 postmenopausal | TTP: 20 vs. 17 weeksb |
 |  |  |  | OS: not reached vs. 123.4 weeksb |
III | Exemestane vs. tamoxifen | 1st line | 371 postmenopausal (6.5%) | RR: 46% vs. 31%b |
 | EORTC [22] |  |  | PFS: 9.9 vs. 5.8 monthsb but NS after 47 months follow-up |
 |  |  |  | OS HR: 1.13 |
III | Anastrozole vs. exemestane [24] | 1st line | 130 postmenopausal | Insufficient accrual |
 |  |  |  | RR: 16% vs. 16% |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 3.71 vs. 4.24 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 33.3 vs. 30.5 months |
II | Megestrol [25] | 2nd line | 73 | CR: 0% |
 |  |  |  | PR: 4% for median of 9 months Median 8 months of stabilization in 48% |
III | Tamoxifen vs. megestrol | 1st line | 182 premenopausal + postmenopausal (17%) | RR: 17% vs. 34%b |
 | POA [82] |  |  | TTF: 5.5 vs. 6.3 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 23.8 vs. 33 months |
III | Vorozole vs. megestrol [18] | 1st/2nd line | 452 postmenopausal (15%) | RR: 10% vs. 7% Duration response: 18.2 vs. 12.5 months |
 |  |  |  | TTP: 2.6 vs. 3.3 months |
 |  |  |  | OS: 26.3 vs. 28.8 months |
II | Estradiol 30 mg by mouth every day vs. estradiol 6 mg by mouth every day [26] | 1st/2nd line | 66 postmenopausal | CBR: 28% vs. 29% |