Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Anthropometric measures and serum estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study

Breast Cancer Research volume 19, Article number: 28 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several anthropometric measures have been associated with hormone-related cancers. However, it is unknown whether estrogen metabolism plays an important role in these relationships. We examined whether measured current body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), height, and self-reported BMI at age 18 years were associated with serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites using baseline, cross-sectional data from 1835 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study.

Methods

Fifteen estrogens/estrogen metabolites were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric means (GMs) of estrogens/estrogen metabolites (in picomoles per liter) were estimated using inverse probability weighted linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders and stratified on menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use.

Results

Among never or former MHT users, current BMI (≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) was positively associated with parent estrogens (multivariable adjusted GM 432 vs. 239 pmol/L for estrone, 74 vs. 46 pmol/L for estradiol; p-trend < 0.001 for both) and all of the 2-, 4-, and 16-pathway estrogen metabolites evaluated (all p-trend ≤ 0.02). After additional adjustment for estradiol, unconjugated methylated 2-catechols were inversely associated (e.g., 2-methoxyestrone multivariable GM 9.3 vs. 12.0 pmol/L; p-trend < 0.001). Among current MHT users, current BMI was not associated with parent estrogens but was inversely associated with methylated catechols (e.g., 2-methoxyestrone multivariable GM 216 vs. 280 pmol/L; p-trend = 0.008). Similar patterns of association were found with WHR; however, the associations were not independent of BMI. Height and BMI at age 18 years were not associated with postmenopausal estrogens/estrogen metabolite levels.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that postmenopausal BMI is associated with increased circulating levels of parent estrogens and reduced methylation of catechol estrogen metabolites, the estrogen metabolism patterns that have previously been associated with higher breast cancer risk.

Background

Several anthropometric measures have been associated with increased risk of various hormone-related cancers (endometrial, ovarian, and postmenopausal breast cancers) [1–7]. Authors of meta-analyses have estimated a 54% increased risk of endometrial cancer [1] and a 12% increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer [6] associated with every 5 kg/m2 increase in body mass index (BMI). Abdominal adiposity estimated by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) has also shown strong positive associations with endometrial and postmenopausal breast cancer risk [1, 4], although it is unclear whether the associations are independent of BMI. Further, every 10-cm increase in height has been associated with a 15% higher risk of endometrial [1] and ovarian cancers [3]. One of the hypothesized mechanisms for the BMI associations is that overweight and obese postmenopausal women have elevated levels of circulating estrogens [8], because adipocytes produce estrogens via aromatase activity [9]. Height may indicate early-life nutritional status and exposure to high levels of endogenous proliferative hormones such as estrogens in preadolescence [10].

Estrogens play a key role in endometrial, ovarian, and breast carcinogenesis [11, 12]. Parent estrogens (estradiol and estrone) stimulate cell proliferation largely via estrogen receptor-mediated mechanisms [13]. Parent estrogens are metabolized via the 2-, 4-, and 16-hydroxylation pathways, leading to an array of metabolites in each pathway. Experimental studies have shown that these metabolites can also stimulate cell proliferation via estrogen receptor-mediated mechanisms, and catechols of 2- and 4-pathways, if not methylated, can induce DNA damage directly by forming quinone DNA adducts or indirectly via redox cycling [14–16]. In recent epidemiologic studies, higher levels of parent estrogens and most estrogen metabolites have consistently been associated with higher risk of endometrial and postmenopausal breast cancers [17–20].

Parent estrogens and estrogen metabolites may play an important role in the associations between anthropometric measures and cancer risk. However, beyond parent estrogens [8, 21–23], little is known about the associations between anthropometric measures and circulating estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. Further, although current menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) users have higher circulating estrogen/estrogen metabolite levels [24, 25], it is unknown whether anthropometrics are associated with further differences in circulating levels. Using cross-sectional data from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Observational Study (OS), we examined whether current BMI, WHR, height, and BMI at age 18 years were associated with circulating levels of 15 estrogens/estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women by MHT use.

Methods

Study population

This study includes participants in a case-control study of ovarian and endometrial cancers nested within the WHI-OS [20, 26]. The WHI-OS is a prospective cohort study in which researchers recruited 93,676 postmenopausal women aged 50–79 years at 40 clinical centers in the United States between 1993 and 1998 [27, 28]. At the baseline clinic visit, anthropometric measures (height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences) were measured and blood samples were collected. Additionally, baseline self-administered questionnaires were used to collect information on participants’ demographics, medical history, and health behaviors.

Details of the nested case-control study are described elsewhere [20, 26]. In brief, cases were women with ovarian or endometrial cancer diagnosed between study enrollment and 2012. Control subjects were selected from among those women who remained cancer-free at the date of case diagnosis and were frequency-matched to cases on the basis of age at baseline (5-year categories), year of blood draw (1993–1996, 1997–1998), race/ethnicity (white, black, Hispanic, other/unknown), hysterectomy at baseline or during follow-up prior to the index date (for ovarian control subjects only), and MHT use (never, ≤1 year since last MHT use, >1 year since last MHT use, current). Participants had no history of cancer (except nonmelanoma skin cancer), bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy (for endometrial control subjects only), and had ≥1.1 ml of serum available.

A total of 1835 women (507 cases and 450 control subjects among never/former MHT users, 457 cases and 421 control subjects among current MHT users), representing 56,109 women when weighted back to the entire cohort, were included in the study. Because all serum samples were collected at baseline prior to cancer diagnosis (mean 6.7 years from baseline to cancer diagnosis), we included both cases and control subjects in this cross-sectional analysis.

Exposure assessment

Baseline measured height and weight as well as waist and hip circumferences were used to calculate current BMI (in kilograms per meter squared) and WHR, respectively. BMI at age 18 years was estimated using height and weight at age 18 years recalled via baseline questionnaire. Current BMI was categorized into three groups using the World Health Organization classification cutpoints for overweight and obesity: <25.0 kg/m2 (normal), 25.0–29.9 kg/m2 (overweight), and ≥30 kg/m2 (obese) [29]. In secondary analyses, we subdivided the obesity category by class (class 1: 30.0–34.9 kg/m2, class 2: 35.0–39.9 kg/m2, class 3: ≥40 kg/m2) [29] to further examine the potential dose-response relationship between current BMI and estrogens/estrogen metabolites. WHR, adult height, and BMI at age 18 years were categorized into tertile groups based on the distributions in the entire study population as follows: WHR <0.76, 0.76–0.82, ≥0.83; height <160 cm, 160–164.9 cm, ≥165 cm; and BMI at age 18 years <20 kg/m2, 20–21.9 kg/m2, ≥22 kg/m2.

Laboratory assays

Aliquoted and batched serum samples were transferred to the Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc. (Frederick, MD, USA), for testing. The assay quantifies the combined concentrations of conjugated and unconjugated forms of 2 parent estrogens (estrone, estradiol) and 13 estrogen metabolites (2-hydroxyestrone, 2-hydroxyestradiol, 2-methoxyestrone, 2-methoxyestradiol, 2-hydroxyestrone-3-methyl ether, 4-hydroxyestrone, 4-methoxyestrone, 4-methoxyestradiol, 16α-hydroxyestrone, estriol, 16-ketoestradiol, 16-epiestriol, 17-epiestriol), as well as the unconjugated concentration of 5 analytes (estrone, estradiol, estriol, 2-methoxyestrone, 2-methoxyestradiol), in serum using a stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay [25]. For the five estrogens/estrogen metabolites with unconjugated measurements, their conjugated concentration was calculated by subtracting the unconjugated concentration from the measured (combined) concentration. For the other ten estrogen metabolites, unconjugated concentration was not separately measured, owing to their low abundance in unconjugated forms. (When we do not specify unconjugated or conjugated form, we refer to the combined measured concentration throughout the paper.) Assay reliability was monitored using masked technical replicates across batches. Coefficients of variation were <6% for all analytes; intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0.93 to 0.996 (median 0.98) [20, 26]. Correlations among the estrogens/estrogen metabolites ranged from 0.34 to 0.99 [20].

Statistical analyses

Because estrogen/estrogen metabolite levels vary by MHT use [24, 25], all analyses were stratified on MHT use (n = 957 never/former users, n = 878 current users). Inverse probability sampling weights were used to adjust the data to represent the population in the entire cohort using methods for secondary phenotype analysis of case-control data described by Li and Gail [30]. Sampling weights were calculated by taking the inverse of sampling fractions: 1 for all cases, and varying weights for control subjects, depending on their strata as defined by matching factors. After log transformation of data to improve normality, geometric means (GMs) in picomoles per liter of individual serum estrogen/estrogen metabolite concentration by exposure categories were estimated using inverse probability weighted linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders: age at blood draw, blood draw year, race, smoking status (never, former, current), and time since menopause (<10 years, 10–19 years, ≥20 years, missing). Additional adjustments for soy and alcohol intake did not change the results and thus were not included in the final models. For current BMI and WHR, we additionally adjusted for physical activity (0, 0.1–9.9, ≥10.0 metabolic equivalents of task-h/week). We performed a test for trend by including the exposure in the model as a continuous variable. The percentage change in GMs between the highest and the lowest categories was estimated by taking the ratio of the GM difference between the two categories over the GM of the lowest category, multiplied by 100. We statistically tested for the difference using a Wald test.

Several secondary analyses were performed. First, for WHR and BMI at age 18 years (Spearman’s r ≤ 0.48 with current BMI), we estimated the associations after additional adjustment for current BMI to examine their independent associations. Second, for current BMI among never/former MHT users, we additionally adjusted for unconjugated estradiol to examine whether the associations with individual estrogen metabolites were driven by their correlations with unconjugated estradiol, the estrogen/estrogen metabolite most strongly correlated with current BMI (Spearman’s r = 0.46). Next, using pathway groups, we investigated whether current BMI was associated with altered patterns of estrogen metabolism. We compared the mean proportions of parent estrogens out of summed estrogens/estrogen metabolites across BMI categories, with adjustment for the summed concentration of estrogens/estrogen metabolites. Further, because 2-, 4-, and 16-pathway metabolites (“child metabolites”) are metabolized from a limited pool of shared precursors (parent estrogens), an increase in the level of one downstream pathway indicates a reduction in levels of other competing pathways. To address this, we modeled proportions of each child metabolite pathway group (2-catechols [2-hydroxyestrone, 2-hydroxyestradiol]; methylated 2-catechols [2-methoxyestrone and 2-methoxyestradiol]; 4-catechols [4-hydroxyestrone]; methylated 4-catechols [4-methoxyestrone, 4-methoxyestradiol]; 16-pathway metabolites [16α-hydroxyestrone, estriol, 16-ketoestradiol, 16-epiestriol, 17-epiestriol]) out of summed child metabolites, with adjustment for the summed concentration of child metabolites. This approach estimates the association with replacement of one pathway group for other pathway groups while holding summed child metabolites constant. We tested for any difference across BMI categories using a global F test; if there was a significant difference (p < 0.05), we performed pairwise t tests for three different combinations of BMI comparisons (25–29.9 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2; ≥30 kg/m2 vs. <25 kg/m2; ≥30 kg/m2 vs. 25–29.9 kg/m2).

Finally, because subclinical or underlying diseases may influence the associations, we performed sensitivity analyses after excluding endometrial and ovarian cancer cases (n = 507 never/former MHT users, n = 457 current MHT users); excluding women with a history of diabetes at baseline (n = 57 never/former MHT users, n = 28 current MHT users); excluding women with low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2; n = 14 never/former MHT users, n = 14 current MHT users); and, among never/former MHT users, excluding women using any potential hormone-related medications (e.g., antiestrogens, glucocorticoid steroids; n = 303). To test the robustness of our results, we also repeated analyses after excluding outliers (≤10 values for never/former MHT users, ≤10 values for current MHT users) identified using the extreme Studentized deviate many-outlier procedure [31] and after further stratifying by never vs. former MHT users (n = 645 never MHT users, n = 312 former MHT users).

All statistical tests were two-sided with a 5% type I error rate. Q values reflecting the false discovery rates (FDRs) were calculated to account for multiple comparisons (25 tests per exposure). Analyses were conducted with SAS version 9 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study population characteristics

The mean age was 64.6 years for never/former MHT users and 61.3 years for current MHT users (Table 1). Most women were white (89% among never/former users, 94% among current users). Compared with never/former MHT users, current users were more likely to have been postmenopausal for <10 years (44% vs. 32%). Mean current BMI, BMI at age 18 years, height, and WHR were similar between the two groups. As expected, serum concentrations of all evaluated estrogens/estrogen metabolites were higher in current MHT users than in never/former users (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 1 Characteristics of study population in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
Full size table
Table 2 Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current body mass index in postmenopausal women not using menopausal hormone therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
Full size table
Table 3 Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current body mass index in postmenopausal women currently using menopausal hormone therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
Full size table

Current body mass index

Among never/former MHT users, higher current BMI (≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) was significantly associated with higher levels of parent estrogens (GM 432 vs. 239 pmol/L for estrone, 73.9 vs. 45.9 pmol/L for estradiol; p-trend < 0.001) and all of the 2-, 4-, and 16-pathway metabolites evaluated (all p-trend ≤ 0.02) (Table 2). However, after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol, these patterns did not persist, and inverse associations were observed for unconjugated methylated 2-catechols (9.29 vs. 12.0 pmol/L, p-trend < 0.001 for unconjugated 2-methoxyestrone; 1.88 vs. 2.37 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.002 for unconjugated 2-methoxyestradiol) (Table 2). Similar dose-response trends were found across classes 1–3 obesity (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Among current MHT users, current BMI (≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) was not associated with parent estrogens (3201 vs. 3201 pmol/L for estrone; 414 vs. 444 pmol/L for estradiol; p-trend ≥ 0.13), but it was inversely associated with methylated catechols (216 vs. 280 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.008 for 2-methoxyestrone; 73.7 vs. 92.6 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.02 for 2-methoxyestradiol; 23.1 vs. 28.9 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.02 for 4-methoxyestrone) (Table 3).

In secondary analyses among never/former MHT users, the proportion of parent estrogens was significantly higher in obese women (BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2, 50.8% vs. 46.7%, respectively; p = 0.006) (Fig. 1). Further, obese women had lower proportions of methylated 2-catechols (15.4% vs. 17.7%; p = 0.001) and methylated 4-catechols (1.5% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.003) and higher proportions of 16-pathway metabolites (60.3% vs. 57.8%; p = 0.0002) (Fig. 2). Similar results were found in overweight women; however, there was no statistically significant difference in proportions between overweight and obese women. Results were similar among current MHT users, although the association with proportion of parent estrogens was statistically nonsignificant (BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2, 56.4% vs. 54.3%, respectively; overall F test p = 0.40) (Additional file 2: Figure S1, Additional file 3: Figure S2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentages of parent estrogens (estradiol and estrone) and child estrogen metabolites (2-, 4-, and 16-hydroxylation pathway metabolites) out of summed estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current body mass index (BMI) among never or former menopausal hormone therapy usersa. Adjusted for age at blood draw (<55, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79 years), blood draw year (1993-1996, 1997-1998), race (white, non-white), smoking status (never, former, current), time since menopause (<10, 10-19, ≥20 years, missing), moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (0, 0.1-9.9, ≥10 MET-hr/wk), summed concentration of estrogens/estrogen metabolites (continuous, pmol/L).Note: Summed estrogens/estrogen metabolites include the summed concentration of parent estrogens (estrone, estradiol) and child metabolites (2-hydroxyestrone, 2-hydroxyestradiol, 2-methoxyestrone, 2-methoxyestradiol, 2-hyroxyestrone-3-methyl ether, 4-hydroxyestrone, 4-methoxyestrone, 4-methoxyestradiol, 16α-hydroxyestrone, estriol, 16-ketoestradiol, 16-epiestriol, 17-epiestriol).aOverall F-test p=0.02.b P-value for comparing percent parent estrogens between women with current BMI 25-29.9 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.11.c P-value for comparing percent parent estrogens between women with current BMI ≥30 vs. 25-29.9 kg/m2 was 0.10. P-value for comparing percent parent estrogens between women with current BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.006.BMI body mass index

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentages of each pathway estrogen metabolites (2-catechols, methylated 2-catechols, 4-catechols, methylated 4-catechols, 16-pathway metabolites) out of summed child estrogen metabolites by current body mass index (BMI) among never/former menopausal hormone therapy users. Adjusted for age at blood draw (<55, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-79 years), blood draw year (1993-1996, 1997-1998), race (white, non-white), smoking status (never, former, current), time since menopause (<10, 10-19, ≥20 years, missing), moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (0, 0.1-9.9, ≥10 MET-hr/wk), summed concentration of child estrogen metabolites (continuous, pmol/L). Note: Summed child estrogen metabolites include the following estrogen metabolites: 2-catechols (2-hydroxyestrone, 2-hydroxyestradiol), methylated 2-catechols (conjugated and unconjugated 2-methoxyestrone, conjugated and unconjugated 2-methoxyestradiol, 2-hyroxyestrone-3-methyl ether), 4-catechols (4-hydroxyestrone), methylated 4-catechols (4-methoxyestrone, 4-methoxyestradiol), 16-pathway metabolites (16α-hydroxyestrone, conjugated and unconjugated estriol, 16-ketoestradiol, 16-epiestriol, 17-epiestriol). aFor 2-catechols, overall F-test p=0.89. bFor methylated 2-catechols, overall F-test p=0.001. P-values for comparing women with current BMI 25-29.9 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.002, comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. 25-29.9 kg/m2 was 0.57, and comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.001. cFor 4-catechols, overall F-test p=0.59. dFor methylated 4-catechols, overall F-test p=0.0002. P-values for comparing women with current BMI 25-29.9 vs. <25 kg/m2 was <0.0001, comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. 25-29.9 kg/m2 was 0.82, and comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.003. eFor 16-pathway metabolites, overall F-test p<0.0001. P-values for comparing women with current BMI 25-29.9 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.0003, comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. 25-29.9 kg/m2 was 0.78, and comparing women with current BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2 was 0.0002.BMI body mass index

Full size image

Waist-to-hip ratio

Among never/former MHT users, WHR (≥0.83 vs. <0.76) was positively associated with parent estrogens (348 vs. 286 pmol/L for estrone, 62.5 vs. 50.2 pmol/L for estradiol; p-trend ≤ 0.01) and nearly all of the 16-pathway metabolites; however, in models mutually adjusting for current BMI and WHR, only current BMI remained significantly associated (Table 4). Among current MHT users, WHR was not associated with parent estrogens but was inversely associated with methylated catechols, namely 2-methoxyestrone (219 vs. 272 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.03), 2-hydroxyestrone-3-methyl ether (35.4 vs. 44.1 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.03), and 4-methoxyestrone (22.8 vs. 28.6 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.04); the associations did not remain significant after adjustment for current BMI (Additional file 4: Table S2).

Table 4 Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by waist-to-hip ratio in postmenopausal women not using menopausal hormone therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
Full size table

Height

Height (≥165 vs. <160 cm) was not associated with circulating estrogens/estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women, except for inverse associations with conjugated 2-methoxyestrone (27.0 vs. 33.2 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.01) and 4-methoxyestrone (3.90 vs. 4.59 pmol/L, p-trend = 0.03) among never/former MHT users (Table 5).

Table 5 Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by height in postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study
Full size table

Body mass index at age 18 years

Among never/former MHT users, BMI at age 18 years (≥22 vs. <20 kg/m2) was positively associated with estradiol (64.1 vs. 49.8 pmol/L; p-trend = 0.04) but was not associated with other estrogens/estrogen metabolites (Additional file 5: Table S3). The association with estradiol did not remain after adjustment for current BMI (data not shown), suggesting that the association may be accounted for by current BMI. Among current MHT users, BMI at age 18 years was not associated with estrogens/estrogen metabolites (Additional file 5: Table S3). There was no statistically significant interaction between BMI at age 18 years and current BMI (p-interaction >0.05) (data not shown).

Most associations remained at 5% FDR (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5, Additional file 1: Table S1, Additional file 4: Table S2, Additional file 5: Table S3). Results were similar after excluding endometrial or ovarian cancer cases at the time of last follow-up (Additional file 6: Table S4), after excluding women who reported a history of diabetes at baseline (data not shown), after excluding women with low BMI (<18.5 kg/m2) (data not shown), after excluding women using any potential hormone-related medications (data not shown), and after further stratifying by never vs. former MHT users (data not shown). Results also did not change after excluding outliers (data not shown).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the relationships of anthropometric measures with detailed serum estrogen/estrogen metabolite measures in postmenopausal women by MHT use. In this cross-sectional analysis, current measured BMI was positively associated with parent estrogens and all estrogen metabolites evaluated among never/former MHT users. Adjusted for unconjugated estradiol, current BMI was inversely associated with methylated 2-catechols but not with the other estrogen metabolites measured, suggesting that associations with individual estrogen metabolites among never/former MHT users were driven largely by their correlations with unconjugated estradiol. Associations with measured WHR were not independent of current BMI, suggesting that the associations were driven by overall adiposity rather than by fat distribution per se. BMI at age 18 years and height were not associated with postmenopausal estrogen/estrogen metabolite levels.

Our findings of positive associations between current BMI and parent estrogens are consistent with those from previous studies [8, 21–23, 32–34]. A pooled analysis of eight studies estimated 83% higher levels of circulating total estradiol and 60% higher levels of total estrone in postmenopausal obese women (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) compared with lean women (BMI <22.5 kg/m2) [8]. These findings are also in line with biological evidence that supports the major source of estrogens in postmenopausal women being via aromatization of androgens in adipose tissue [35, 36]. Further, although few studies have examined the associations in current MHT users, our findings are consistent with data from the Nurses’ Health Study regarding unconjugated estradiol BMI (≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) associations in both never/former and current MHT users and the finding of stronger positive associations in never/former users (62% vs. 22% change in estradiol levels) [23]. In the present study, unconjugated estradiol was consistently positively associated with current BMI (≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) among both never/former (130% change) and current MHT users (20% change), although the association was not statistically significant in current MHT users. The differential associations between BMI and parent estrogens by MHT use mirror the similar differential associations of BMI with cancer risk [37, 38], further supporting the notion that endogenous estrogens may mediate the BMI-cancer association, although alternative mechanisms may also exist [24, 39, 40]. The positive associations of BMI with postmenopausal breast cancer [37, 38] and endometrial cancer [41, 42] risk have been found consistently in women not using MHT; however, the associations have been weakly positive or near null among current MHT users [37, 38, 41, 42], possibly owing to a threshold effect of circulating estrogens in current MHT users. Current MHT users have higher circulating levels of estrogens; thus, increased estrogen production by adipose tissue may not contribute to further increase in cancer risk. Moreover, given the high estrogen levels in current MHT users, the association with BMI on the relative scale may be masked, whereas an absolute difference in estrogen concentration may be apparent, as in never/former users.

To date, few studies have examined current BMI in relation to estrogen metabolism beyond parent estrogens. Earlier studies measured only two estrogen metabolites that have been thought to be the most and the least carcinogenic: 16α-hydroxyestrone and 2-hydroxyestrone, respectively [43–46]. These earlier studies have shown an inverse association between adiposity and the ratio of urinary 2-hydroxyestrone to 16α-hydroxyestrone in both pre- and postmenopausal women [44, 45, 47]. In a more recent analysis in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial cohort, self-reported BMI was positively correlated with all 15 serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites among postmenopausal women who had never used MHT [34]; however, whether the associations with estrogen metabolites remained after accounting for correlations with parent estrogens was not assessed. Although we observed similar positive associations with estrogens/estrogen metabolites using measured BMI among never/former MHT users in the present study, the associations did not remain after adjustment for unconjugated estradiol. Similarly to our findings of inverse associations between BMI and methylated 2-catechols after adjusting for unconjugated estradiol in postmenopausal women, researchers in a study of premenopausal women found that BMI was inversely associated with most methylated catechols measured in urine [48]. In our secondary analyses, we also observed that obese women appeared to be less likely to metabolize parent estrogens into child metabolites in general but more likely to favor metabolism of parent estrogens into 16-pathway estrogen metabolites over 2- or 4-methylated catechols. Our findings provide novel, additional detailed information about patterns of estrogen metabolism. They are in line with results from a previous study that evaluated 12 estrogens/estrogen metabolites in prepubertal girls and observed higher levels of 16α-hydroxyestrone and lower levels of 2-methoxyestradiol in obese girls (BMI >95th percentile vs. 10th–85th percentile) [49]. Although the exact mechanisms for this relationship are not clear, reduced catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) activity associated with obesity [50] and/or suppressed COMT activity by estradiol [51, 52] may explain the decreased methylation of catechols with increased BMI observed in the present study. Methylation prevents catechols from metabolizing into quinones, which can form quinone adducts and induce oxidative DNA damage [53]. Further, reduced levels of methylated 2-catechols in obese women (BMI ≥30 vs. <25 kg/m2) are also in line with studies that have consistently shown lower ratios of 2-pathway metabolites to parent estrogens to be associated with higher postmenopausal breast cancer risk [17–19].

In the present study, we did not observe associations of WHR with estrogens/estrogen metabolites after adjustment for current BMI. Similarly, in studies where body fat distribution was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [32] or measured WHR [33], central obesity was not associated with circulating unconjugated estradiol independent of BMI among postmenopausal women not using MHT, suggesting that body fat distribution does not provide additional information about circulating estradiol beyond what overall adiposity (as measured by BMI) provides.

In the present study, adult height and BMI at age 18 years were not associated with estrogens/estrogen metabolites after adjustment for current BMI. BMI at age 18 years and height may indicate early-life nutritional status, which may not influence estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal women. In a study of premenopausal women, BMI at age 18 years was not associated with urinary estrogen/estrogen metabolite levels; however, contrary to our findings, height was inversely associated with urinary parent estrogens and 2-pathway metabolites in the same study [48]. The difference in results may be due to the variation in study populations (e.g., age, menopausal status) or biospecimen used (circulating vs. excreted levels).

We acknowledge several limitations of this study. We measured circulating estrogens/estrogen metabolites in a single baseline serum sample. However, in a previous study using the same assay we used, researchers showed moderate to high 1-year ICCs in postmenopausal women for parent estrogens (0.72 for estrone, 0.65 for estradiol) and most estrogen metabolites of 2-, 4-, and 16-pathways (range 0.35–0.53), with the exception of 2-methoxyestrone (0.10) and 2-hydroxyestrone-3-methyl ether (0.14) [17], suggesting that measured serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites may also adequately represent postmenopausal levels over at least 1 year. BMI at age 18 years was based on self-reported height and weight. However, measurement error in this context is unlikely to be related to serum estrogen levels and, if present, would likely underestimate the associations. Although we cannot exclude the possibility of false-positives, most associations with current BMI remained at 5% FDR.

Despite these limitations, this study has important strengths. Whereas most epidemiologic studies have used self-reported measures, measurement error in the present study was reduced by using measured height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences. Use of a high-performance LC-MS/MS assay also allowed comprehensive evaluation of individual estrogens/estrogen metabolites with high reliability, sensitivity, and specificity. By stratifying the analysis by MHT use, we were able to take into account variations in estrogen/estrogen metabolite levels by exogenous hormone use. Further, use of a large sample size and careful adjustment for potential confounders assessed at blood collection increased the validity of the results.

Conclusions

In this comprehensive analysis of measured anthropometrics and serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites, we observed strong positive associations between current BMI and parent estrogens in postmenopausal women not using MHT. Adjusted for unconjugated estradiol, current BMI was also associated with lower levels of methylated catechols among both never/former and current MHT users. Similar estrogen metabolism patterns have previously been associated with higher breast cancer risk; thus, these findings further support the need to prospectively evaluate the roles of endogenous estrogens/estrogen metabolites in the BMI-breast cancer risk association.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

COMT:

Catechol-O-methyltransferase

FDR:

False discovery rate

GM:

Geometric mean

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

LC-MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

MET:

Metabolic equivalent of task

MHT:

Menopausal hormone therapy

OS:

Observational Study

WHI:

Women’s Health Initiative

WHR:

Waist-to-hip ratio

References

  1. Aune D, Navarro Rosenblatt DA, Chan DS, Vingeliene S, Abar L, Vieira AR, et al. Anthropometric factors and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(8):1635–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheraghi Z, Poorolajal J, Hashem T, Esmailnasab N, Doosti IA. Effect of body mass index on breast cancer during premenopausal and postmenopausal periods: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. Ovarian cancer and body size: individual participant meta-analysis including 25,157 women with ovarian cancer from 47 epidemiological studies. PLoS Med. 2012;9(4):e1001200.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly BS, Barnett C, Vogt KN, Li T, Stone J, Boyd NF. A meta-analysis of published literature on waist-to-hip ratio and risk of breast cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2002;44(2):127–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van den Brandt PA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, Adami HO, Beeson L, Folsom AR, et al. Pooled analysis of prospective cohort studies on height, weight, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(6):514–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371(9612):569–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neuhouser ML, Aragaki AK, Prentice RL, Manson JE, Chlebowski R, Carty CL, et al. Overweight, obesity, and postmenopausal invasive breast cancer risk: a secondary analysis of the Women’s Health Initiative randomized clinical trials. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(5):611–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Key TJ, Appleby PN, Reeves GK, Roddam A, Dorgan JF, Longcope C, et al. Body mass index, serum sex hormones, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(16):1218–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siiteri PK. Adipose tissue as a source of hormones. Am J Clin Nutr. 1987;45(1 Suppl):277–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder DG, Martorell R, Rivera JA, Ruel MT, Habicht JP. Age differences in the impact of nutritional supplementation on growth. J Nutr. 1995;125(4 Suppl):1051S–9S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, Reeves G, Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(8):606–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown SB, Hankinson SE. Endogenous estrogens and the risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers. Steroids. 2015;99(Pt A):8–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santen RJ, Yue W, Wang JP. Estrogen metabolites and breast cancer. Steroids. 2015;99(Pt A):61–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cavalieri E, Frenkel K, Liehr JG, Rogan E, Roy D. Estrogens as endogenous genotoxic agents—DNA adducts and mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2000;27:75–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cavalieri E, Chakravarti D, Guttenplan J, Hart E, Ingle J, Jankowiak R, et al. Catechol estrogen quinones as initiators of breast and other human cancers: implications for biomarkers of susceptibility and cancer prevention. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1766(1):63–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yager JD, Davidson NE. Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(3):270–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Falk RT, Brinton LA, Dorgan JF, Fuhrman BJ, Veenstra TD, Xu X, et al. Relationship of serum estrogens and estrogen metabolites to postmenopausal breast cancer risk: a nested case-control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15(2):R34.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallal CM, Tice JA, Buist DS, Bauer DC, Lacey Jr JV, Cauley JA, et al. Estrogen metabolism and breast cancer risk among postmenopausal women: a case-cohort study within B ~ FIT. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(2):346–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fuhrman BJ, Schairer C, Gail MH, Boyd-Morin J, Xu X, Sue LY, et al. Estrogen metabolism and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(4):326–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brinton LA, Trabert B, Anderson GL, Falk RT, Felix AS, Fuhrman BJ, et al. Serum estrogens and estrogen metabolites and endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(7):1081–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Manson JE, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. Alcohol, height, and adiposity in relation to estrogen and prolactin levels in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(17):1297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lukanova A, Lundin E, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Muti P, Mure A, Rinaldi S, et al. Body mass index, circulating levels of sex-steroid hormones, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3: a cross-sectional study in healthy women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(2):161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tworoger SS, Missmer SA, Barbieri RL, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Hankinson SE. Plasma sex hormone concentrations and subsequent risk of breast cancer among women using postmenopausal hormones. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(8):595–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Edlefsen KL, Jackson RD, Prentice RL, Janssen I, Rajkovic A, O’Sullivan MJ, et al. The effects of postmenopausal hormone therapy on serum estrogen, progesterone, and sex hormone-binding globulin levels in healthy postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2010;17(3):622–9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nachtigall LE, Raju U, Banerjee S, Wan L, Levitz M. Serum estradiol-binding profiles in postmenopausal women undergoing three common estrogen replacement therapies: associations with sex hormone-binding globulin, estradiol, and estrone levels. Menopause. 2000;7(4):243–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Trabert B, Brinton LA, Anderson GL, Pfeiffer RM, Falk RT, Strickler HD, et al. Circulating estrogens and postmenopausal ovarian cancer risk in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(4):648–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Langer RD, White E, Lewis CE, Kotchen JM, Hendrix SL, Trevisan M. The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study: baseline characteristics of participants and reliability of baseline measures. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13(9 Suppl):S107–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. The Women’s Health Initiative Study Group. Design of the Women’s Health Initiative clinical trial and observational study. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(1):61–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. World Health Organization (WHO). Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee. Technical Report Series number 854. Geneva: WHO; 1995. p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li HL, Gail MH. Efficient adaptively weighted analysis of secondary phenotypes in case-control genome-wide association studies. Hum Hered. 2012;73(3):159–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosner B. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics. 1983;25(2):165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahabir S, Baer DJ, Johnson LL, Hartman TJ, Dorgan JF, Campbell WS, et al. Usefulness of body mass index as a sufficient adiposity measurement for sex hormone concentration associations in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(12):2502–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liedtke S, Schmidt ME, Vrieling A, Lukanova A, Becker S, Kaaks R, et al. Postmenopausal sex hormones in relation to body fat distribution. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(5):1088–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Schairer C, Fuhrman BJ, Boyd-Morin J, Genkinger JM, Gail MH, Hoover RN, et al. Quantifying the role of circulating unconjugated estradiol in mediating the body mass index-breast cancer association. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016;25(1):105–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Folkerd EJ, James VH. Aromatization of steroids in peripheral tissues. J Steroid Biochem. 1983;19(1B):687–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Grodin JM, Siiteri PK, MacDonald PC. Source of estrogen production in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1973;36(2):207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. White KK, Park SY, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wilkens LR. Body size and breast cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort. Int J Cancer. 2012;131(5):E705–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang Z, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Hunter DJ, Manson JE, et al. Dual effects of weight and weight gain on breast cancer risk. JAMA. 1997;278(17):1407–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Rohan TE, Manson JE, et al. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(1):48–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hvidtfeldt UA, Gunter MJ, Lange T, Chlebowski RT, Lane D, Farhat GN, et al. Quantifying mediating effects of endogenous estrogen and insulin in the relation between obesity, alcohol consumption, and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(7):1203–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chang SC, Lacey Jr JV, Brinton LA, Hartge P, Adams K, Mouw T, et al. Lifetime weight history and endometrial cancer risk by type of menopausal hormone use in the NIH-AARP diet and health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(4):723–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Dougan MM, Hankinson SE, Vivo ID, Tworoger SS, Glynn RJ, Michels KB. Prospective study of body size throughout the life-course and the incidence of endometrial cancer among premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(3):625–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Matthews CE, Fowke JH, Dai Q, Leon Bradlow H, Jin F, Shu XO, et al. Physical activity, body size, and estrogen metabolism in women. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(5):473–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Coker AL, Crane MM, Sticca RP, Sepkovic DW. Re: Ethnic differences in estrogen metabolism in healthy women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(1):89–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schneider J, Bradlow HL, Strain G, Levin J, Anderson K, Fishman J. Effects of obesity on estradiol metabolism: decreased formation of nonuterotropic metabolites. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;56(5):973–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Modugno F, Kip KE, Cochrane B, Kuller L, Klug TL, Rohan TE, et al. Obesity, hormone therapy, estrogen metabolism and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118(5):1292–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fishman J, Boyar RM, Hellman L. Influence of body weight on estradiol metabolism in young women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1975;41(5):989–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie J, Eliassen AH, Xu X, Matthews CE, Hankinson SE, Ziegler RG, et al. Body size in relation to urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites (EM) among premenopausal women during the luteal phase. Hormones Cancer. 2012;3(5-6):249–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mauras N, Santen RJ, Colon-Otero G, Hossain J, Wang Q, Mesaros C, et al. Estrogens and their genotoxic metabolites are increased in obese prepubertal girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(6):2322–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang SS, Morton LM, Bergen AW, Lan EZ, Chatterjee N, Kvale P, et al. Genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and obesity in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Hum Genet. 2007;122(1):41–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Jiang H, Xie T, Ramsden DB, Ho SL. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase down-regulation by estradiol. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45(7):1011–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Xie T, Ho SL, Ramsden D. Characterization and implications of estrogenic down-regulation of human catechol-O-methyltransferase gene transcription. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;56(1):31–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Yager JD. Endogenous estrogens as carcinogens through metabolic activation. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2000;27:67–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The WHI program is supported by contracts from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Program Office (Jacques Rossouw, Shari Ludlam, Joan McGowan, Leslie Ford, and Nancy Geller). The authors thank the WHI Clinical Coordinating Center (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA) and the WHI investigators (Garnet Anderson, Ross Prentice, Andrea LaCroix, Charles Kooperberg, JoAnn E. Manson, Barbara V. Howard, Marcia L. Stefanick, Rebecca Jackson, Cynthia A. Thomson, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Marian Limacher, Jennifer Robinson, Lewis Kuller, Sally Shumaker, Robert Brunner, and Karen L. Margolis) for their dedication, as well as the study participants for making the program possible. A full list of WHI investigators can be found at https://www.whi.org/researchers/Documents%20%20Write%20a%20Paper/WHI%20Investigator%20Long%20List.pdf.

Funding

The WHI program is funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through contracts HHSN268201100046C, HHSN268201100001C, HHSN268201100002C, HHSN268201100003C, HHSN268201100004C, and HHSN271201100004C. This study was also supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of the National Cancer Institute.

Authors’ contributions

HO performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. BT developed and designed the study aims and made substantial contributions to statistical analysis, interpretation of data, and critical revision and editing of the manuscript. SBC made substantial contributions to statistical analysis and revision of the manuscript. CEM made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. RTF made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. ESL made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. JWW made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. JS made substantial contributions to statistical analysis and revision of the manuscript. RMP made substantial contributions to statistical analysis and revision of the manuscript. LAB developed the study aims and made substantial contributions to revision of the manuscript. NW developed the study aims and made substantial contributions to revision of the manuscript. GLA made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. JEM made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. CC made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. OZ made substantial contributions to interpretation of data and revision of the manuscript. XX developed and performed the assay and contributed to revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Office of Human Subjects Research at the National Institutes of Health approved this analysis. As required by the WHI protocol, informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. Informed consent documents and procedures were approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center and by the IRBs of each of the participating clinical centers (see Additional file 7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 6E332, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA

    Hannah Oh, Sally B. Coburn, Charles E. Matthews, Roni T. Falk, Joshua Sampson, Ruth M. Pfeiffer, Louise A. Brinton, Nicolas Wentzensen & Britton Trabert

  2. Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente NW, Portland, OR, USA

    Erin S. LeBlanc

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Jean Wactawski-Wende

  4. Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Garnet L. Anderson & Chu Chen

  5. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    JoAnn E. Manson

  6. School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Oleg Zaslavsky

  7. Cancer Research Technology Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA

    Xia Xu

Authors
  1. Hannah Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sally B. Coburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles E. Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roni T. Falk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erin S. LeBlanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean Wactawski-Wende
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Joshua Sampson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ruth M. Pfeiffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Louise A. Brinton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nicolas Wentzensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Garnet L. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. JoAnn E. Manson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Chu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Oleg Zaslavsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Xia Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Britton Trabert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Oh.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current BMI (<25, 25–29.9, 30–34.9, ≥40 kg/m2) in postmenopausal women not using menopausal hormone therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. (PDF 93 kb)

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Percentages of parent estrogens (estradiol and estrone) and child estrogen metabolites (2-, 4-, and 16-hydroxylation pathway metabolites) out of summed estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current BMI among current menopausal hormone therapy users. (PPTX 63 kb)

Additional file 3: Figure S2.

Percentages of each pathway estrogens/estrogen metabolites (2-catechols, methylated 2-catechols, 4-catechols, methylated 4-catechols, 16-pathway metabolites) out of summed child estrogen metabolites by current BMI among current menopausal hormone therapy users. (PPTX 70 kb)

Additional file 4: Table S2.

Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by waist-to-hip ratio in postmenopausal women currently using menopausal hormone therapy in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. (PDF 95 kb)

Additional file 5: Table S3.

Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by BMI at age 18 years in postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. (PDF 94 kb)

Additional file 6: Table S4.

Geometric means (pmol/L) and 95% CIs of serum estrogens/estrogen metabolites by current BMI in postmenopausal women not using menopausal hormone therapy among control subjects only in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. (PDF 103 kb)

Additional file 7:

Women’s Health Initiative clinical centers. (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, H., Coburn, S.B., Matthews, C.E. et al. Anthropometric measures and serum estrogen metabolism in postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Breast Cancer Res 19, 28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0810-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0810-0

Keywords

Breast Cancer Research

ISSN: 1465-542X

Contact us