COX-2 modulates mammary tumor progression in response to collagen density
© Esbona et al. 2016
Received: 12 November 2015
Accepted: 3 March 2016
Published: 22 March 2016
High breast density is linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, and correlates with changes in collagen. In a mouse model of mammary carcinoma in the context of increased collagen deposition, the MMTV-PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae , there is accelerated mammary tumor formation and progression. Previous gene expression analysis suggests that increased collagen density elevates expression of PTGS2 (prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2), the gene for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).
To understand the role of COX-2 in tumor progression within a collagen-dense microenvironment, we treated MMTV-PyMT or MMTV-PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae tumors prior to and after tumor formation. Animals received treatment with celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, or placebo. Mammary tumors were examined for COX-2, inflammatory and stromal cell components, and collagen deposition through immunohistochemical analysis, immunofluorescence, multiplex cytokine ELISA and tissue imaging techniques.
PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae tumors were larger, more proliferative, and expressed higher levels of COX-2 and PGE2 than PyMT tumors in wild type (WT) mice. Treatment with celecoxib significantly decreased the induced tumor size and metastasis of the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors, such that their size was not different from the smaller PyMT tumors. Celecoxib had minimal effect on the PyMT tumors. Celecoxib decreased expression levels of COX-2, PGE2, and Ki-67. Several cytokines were over-expressed in PyMT/Col1a1 compared to PyMT, and celecoxib treatment prevented their over-expression. Furthermore, macrophage and neutrophil recruitment were enhanced in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors, and this effect was inhibited by celecoxib. Notably, COX-2 inhibition reduced overall collagen deposition. Finally, when celecoxib was used prior to tumor formation, PyMT/Col1a1 tumors were fewer and smaller than in untreated animals.
These findings suggest that COX-2 has a direct role in modulating tumor progression in tumors arising within collagen-dense microenvironments, and suggest that COX-2 may be an effective therapeutic target for women with dense breast tissue and early-stage breast cancer.
Breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer in women with upwards of 40,000 deaths annually in the USA . Women who have over 75 % mammographic breast density have a more than four-fold increased risk for developing breast cancer, making it one of the most significant risk factors for this disease [2–6]. High breast density correlates with larger amounts of collagen fibers in the breast tissue , and a key feature of this density/collagen association is the presence of excessive and altered collagen structure and distribution. Our group has defined changes in collagen structure that manifest as bundles of straightened and aligned collagen fibers oriented perpendicular to a tumor boundary, termed tumor associated collagen signature-3 (TACS-3) , which are associated with decreased survival among patients with breast cancer . In a transgenic mouse model with increased collagen deposition (mouse mammary tumor virus-polyomavirus middle T/carrying the collagenase transgene (MMTV-PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae )) the number and size of tumors and metastases increases three-fold [8, 10]. Despite the accumulation of data suggesting a role for increased collagen in mammary tumor progression, the molecular mechanisms for the increased risk and subsequent cancer development are unknown.
We previously found that culture of mammary epithelial cells in a high-density collagen matrix significantly upregulates prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), the gene for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) [11, 12]. COX-2 over-expression is observed in 40 % of patients with invasive breast carcinoma and correlates with poor prognosis [13–15]. Unlike the constitutive activity of COX-1, COX-2 is an inducible enzyme that synthesizes prostaglandins, including prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and is activated at sites of injury as part of the inflammation response . Mammographically dense breast tissue has elevated COX-2 expression compared to breast tissue from women with low mammographic density . In rodent models of mammary neoplasms, COX-2 over-expression promotes tumor formation and progression to metastasis, in addition to increased angiogenesis, cell migration, and invasion [12, 18–21]. High COX-2 expression correlates with increased levels of aligned collagen and both are the driving force for the development of ductal carcinoma in situ in a postpartum mammary gland involution mouse model. Moreover, treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which inhibit cyclooxygenases, reverses this effect . Celecoxib is a selective NSAID that specifically inhibits COX-2 and is the only COX-2 inhibitor currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the USA . Several studies have demonstrated that NSAIDs decrease the risk of cancer development [23–30]. Specifically, celecoxib prevents sporadic colorectal adenoma  and several clinical trials have evaluated the use of celecoxib alone or in combination with chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer settings . Despite these associations, the role of COX-2 in collagen remodeling and in development of invasive breast cancer is still unclear.
In this report we tested the hypothesis that breast density promotes high COX-2 levels, which support tumor growth and progression. The goal of this study was to describe the role of COX-2, inflammation, and density in the breast tumor microenvironment. We found that COX-2 and PGE2 levels are elevated in the collagen dense (PyMT/Col1a1) tumors, and COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib decreases these expression levels. Treatment with celecoxib significantly diminished tumor growth and proliferation in the collagen dense tumors. Many cytokines were over-expressed in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors, and COX-2 inhibition reversed their over-expression. Results from this cytokine panel led us to look closer at different immune and stromal cell populations and their response to COX-2 inhibition in PyMT/Col1a1 and wild-type (WT) tumor microenvironments. We found that macrophage and neutrophil recruitment are enhanced in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors and enhancement was blocked by COX-2 inhibition. In addition, celecoxib decreased α-SMA+ fibroblast numbers in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. Collagen deposition in both PyMT and PyMT/Col1a1 tumor microenvironments was diminished with celecoxib; however, normal mammary glands were not affected by COX-2 inhibition. Together, these findings suggest that COX-2 has a direct role in modulating tumor progression in dense matrices, which promote a more invasive cancer effect. COX-2 may be an effective therapeutic target for women with dense breast-tissue-associated breast cancer.
Mice and trial design
Mice were maintained and bred at the University of Wisconsin under the oversight of and with the ethical approval of the University of Wisconsin Animal Use and Care Committee (approved protocol # M01688). A therapeutic mouse model was used to evaluate the effects of high COX-2 expression in an advanced stage of mammary cancer (Fig. 2a). Nulliparous female MMTV-PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae , their PyMT counterparts bearing mammary tumors, Col1a1 tm1jae (no tumor), and their WT littermates were randomly assigned to a daily treatment of 0.2 mg (linear scale from 600 mg human dose or 10 mg/kg of body weight) celecoxib (Pfeizer Inc.) suspended in 5 % methyl cellulose or 5 % methyl cellulose alone (vehicle) at 11 weeks of age for a duration of 21 days. Dosage calculations were made for a 20-g mouse. Tissues were collected for study at 14 weeks of age.
To evaluate the effects of COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib in response to collagen density as a preventive breast cancer therapy, a preventive mouse mammary model was used (Fig. 8a). Female MMTV-PyMT/Col1a1 tm1jae , their WT counterparts bearing mammary tumors, Col1a1 tm1jae (no tumor), and their WT littermates at 10 days of age were randomly assigned to treatment with celecoxib suspension or vehicle. Ten days of age is as early as neonate mice can be handled for oral administration of their assigned treatment, and is a developmental stage that precedes tumor formation in this model. First, neonate mice were orally fed with celecoxib 3.3 mg/kg of body weight (linear scale from 200 mg human dose) or vehicle every other day until they were weaned at 3 weeks of age. Dosage calculations were made for a 10-g mouse. At this low dose, celecoxib is not thought to interfere with development or cause other physiological complications in the pediatric population [32, 33]. At weaning, the dose was increased to 6.7 mg/kg of body weight (linear scale from 400 mg human dose) every other day until mice reached 9 weeks of age. Dosage calculations were made for a 20-g mouse. At 9 weeks of age, tumors were clearly palpable, and animals were killed for tissue analysis.
The following antibodies were used for immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) and/or immunofluorescence (IF): COX-2 (Cayman 160126), PGE2 (Abcam ab2318), Ki-67 (Abcam ab15580), β-NGF (Abcam ab6199), IL-17A-R (LSBio LS-B6706), F4/80 (AbD Serotec MCA497R), Ly6g (Biolegend 127601), vimentin (Abcam ab92547) and alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) (Abcam ab5694).
Histology, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence
For histology the tissues were fixed in 10 % formalin for 48 h followed by paraffin-embedding (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE)). Tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For IHC, FFPE tissues were deparaffinized as per standard, followed by dehydration and antigen retrieval with Citra Plus (Biogenex HK080-5 K) for 15 minutes, blocking with BLOXALL, avidin/biotin (Vector SP-6000 and SP-2001, respectively), and normal serum. Primary antibodies were incubated either overnight at 4 °C (anti-COX-2 or anti-PGE2 1:500) or were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (anti-Ki-67 1:200). Tissue sections were incubated with biotinylated rabbit IgG (Vector, BA-1100) for 10 minutes after 30-minute incubation with R.T.U. Vectastain kit Elite ABC (Vector PK-7100). For IF, tissue sections were treated as described above for 20 minutes to retrieve antigens and then were subjected to the TSA Plus kit for tissue labeling following the manufacturers’ protocols (Perkin Elmer, fluorescein NEL741E001KT, Cy 3.5 NEL744E001KT and Cy 5 NEL745E001KT). Briefly, primary antibodies were incubated as follows: COX-2 (1:1000, overnight); PGE2 (1:5000, 1 h); β-nerve growth factor (NGF) (1:6000, O/N); IL17RA (1:10000, 1 h); F4/80 (1:1000, 1 h); Ly6g (1:1000, 1 h); vimentin (1:1000, 1 h); α-SMA (1:1000, 1 h). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit (Abcam, ab7090) or anti-rat (Abcam, ab7097) was added for 10 minutes after 10 minutes incubation with TSA Plus kit working solution including the desired fluorophore. Tissues underwent the antigen retrieval step for 20 minutes if the same tissue would be subjected to multiple labeling, before counterstaining with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 2 minutes at 1:10000 (Life Technologies, D21490).
Nuance and InForm software
IF and IHC image experiments were acquired using a Nuance microscope with × 20 objective and software version 3.0.12 (Perkin Elmer) with analysis as previously described . Briefly, a spectral library was created using image cubes to define distinctive spectral curves for each fluorophore, chromogen, and counterstain to adjust for background effects and accurately quantify positive staining of biomarkers using InForm version 1.4.0 software (Perkin Elmer). This software analysis allows objective counting of cell populations and biomarkers and increases the accuracy of the statistical analysis. Algorithms for tissue and subcellular compartment separation were created by machine learning and all algorithms had precision above 95 % (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Algorithms were created for separating tissue compartments into stroma and epithelium, and to identify nuclei to accurately assign associations for positive staining to a specific compartment in the tumor microenvironment. To create each algorithm, 10 % of the image dataset was used for each experiment.
Masson’s trichrome and color segmentation software
To assess collagen deposition in the tumor tissue and mammary glands, Masson trichrome staining (Cancer Diagnostics Inc., SS1026-MAB-250) was used on paraffin-embedded sections. Color images were analyzed with FIJI software and the color segmentation plugin (Daniel Sage, 2008, http://bigwww.epfl.ch/sage/soft/colorsegmentation/) using the K-means algorithm clustering method. All images had the same pixel size and so the total area of collagen could be quantitated as the number of blue pixels over the total number of pixels per image.
To describe a cell signaling mechanism for collagen density changes in response to high COX-2 levels and to COX-2 inhibition, a mouse cytokine ELISA plate array (Signosis, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used. In this quantitative chemiluminescence plate array, 23 mouse cytokines were monitored simultaneously for their expression levels in relation to collagen deposition and COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib. The cytokine signal was measured with a fluorometer (Fluoroskan, Ascent, FL) and Ascent software version 2.6 (Thermo Scientific). To compare fold-change differences, data were normalized to a blank and graphically represented by normalization to PyMT vehicle cytokine data levels.
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and analysis
Highly sensitive and quantitative PET imaging was used to study potential preventative effects of COX-2 inhibition. All mice were fasted for 8 h prior to intravenous injection of approximately 5 MBq of 2′-deoxy-2′-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) 1 h before imaging. Mice were anesthetized with inhalation gas (2 % isoflurane gas mixed with 1 L/minute of pure oxygen) and kept under a heat lamp during injection until imaging. Mice were imaged in a prone position on a Siemens Inveon Hybrid micro-PET/CT (Siemens Medical Solutions, Knoxville, TN, USA). A 10-minute PET scan was acquired and data were displayed as a histogram in one static frame; data were subsequently reconstructed using ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) of three dimensions followed by the maximum a posteriori algorithm (matrix size = 128, 128, and 159; pixel size = 0.776, 0.776, and 0.796 mm; iterations = 18; subsets = 16; and beta smoothing factor = 0.004). Data were not corrected for attenuation or scatter. PET analysis was performed using Siemens Inveon software (Siemens Medical Solutions). The data were normalized to animal weight, amount of injected PET tracer, and tracer decay. A sphere was drawn and positioned over identified tumors and tumor volume and mean FDG uptake were calculated by the software.
The analyses were performed to study the effect of COX-2 in mammary tumor progression in response to cell matrix density. Mixed linear models were used to assess differences between the various factors. The data were tested for normality and were log transformed as necessary. Every statistical test was two-sided, and a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the procedure PROC MIXED from the SAS/STAT® software (version 9.4).
COX-2 expression levels are elevated in collagen-dense tumors
To assess whether COX-2 is involved in tumor growth and enhanced in a collagen-dense tumor microenvironment, we used our previously characterized transgenic mouse model of increased stromal collagen based on the Col1a1 tm1jae mouse. This transgenic line has a mutation in the collagenase cleavage site of the α1 chain of collagen I, leading to increased collagen accumulation . Mammary tumors were induced by the expression of the robust transgene, MMTV-PyMT, in which mammary carcinomas are driven by expression of the polyoma middle-T antigen, resulting in a mammary carcinoma that shares many histopathologic features with progression of human breast cancer [35, 36]. The resulting female progeny of Col1a1/+ x MMTV-PyMT carry the MMTV-PyMT transgene on either the WT or Col1a1 tm1jae /+ background.
COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib diminishes tumor growth and progression to metastasis
Inflammatory cytokines regulated by density and COX-2 inhibition
Because we observed high levels of IL17A in the cytokine array data, we characterized the expression of IL-17A receptor (IL-17A-R) as a measure of cell populations that may be recruited by this cytokine. We observed that IL-17A-R is mostly expressed by cell populations in the stromal compartment, and was significantly elevated in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors compared to PyMT tumors (Fig. 4b and d). Celecoxib treatment inhibited IL-17A-R-expressing cell populations within the stroma of the collagen-dense tumor microenvironment (Fig. 4b and d). Together these findings indicate that tumor density and COX-2 expression play a role in cytokine expression, perhaps via inflammatory pathways.
Collagen-dense tumors and COX-2 regulate macrophage and neutrophil populations
Collagen-dense tumors and COX-2 regulate fibroblast populations
Administration of celecoxib prior to tumor formation diminishes tumor growth and number
To further understand the underlying mechanisms of COX-2 inhibition and its response to the collagen-dense tumor microenvironment in this early treatment setting, we measured levels of different cytokines using the multiplex ELISA cytokine array described above. The relative levels of cytokines followed the same trends as in the later therapeutic study (Fig. 3). Most cytokines had 2-fold increased expression: the greatest increases were in the expression of epithelial growth factor (EGF) (3.4-fold), leptin (3.2-fold), IL-1α (3.3-fold), granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (3.7-fold), monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) (3.1-fold), and β-NGF (3.8-fold) (Fig. 8g). Collagen-dense tumors tended to express significantly higher levels of cytokines compared to WT tumors. Additionally, when PyMT and PyMT/Col1a1 mice were treated with celecoxib, the relative levels of cytokines declined (Fig. 8g). Similar to the later therapeutic study, these results suggest that collagen density affects expression of cytokines in a manner that is reversed by celecoxib. Together, these data indicate that COX-2 is a significant driver of tumor formation and growth in collagen-dense tumors. Celecoxib reverses the increased tumor progression of the collagen-dense microenvironment, although it cannot completely prevent tumor incidence in this genetically driven MMTV-PyMT mouse model.
COX-2 over-expression in breast cancer is associated with poor patient prognosis and is emerging as a key mediator of tumor inflammation. Here, we determined the role of COX-2 in regulating the enhanced tumor formation and progression that we observed in the collagen-dense tumor microenvironment. We found that PyMT/Col1a1 tumors arising in collagen-dense tissue were associated with a more inflammatory microenvironment than PyMT tumors arising in WT mice. Over-expression of COX-2 is a major contributor to the inflammatory milieu of collagen-dense tumors, and leads to recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs). Subsequently, we demonstrated that we can reverse recruitment of inflammatory cell populations in the dense tumor microenvironment by selectively inhibiting COX-2 with celecoxib. In addition, celecoxib reduced collagen deposition and decreased αSMA+ fibroblasts, mainly in the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. These data suggest there may be a therapeutic opportunity to treat tumors arising in dense breast tissue with celecoxib. As the clinical findings with celecoxib as a therapeutic or preventative approach to breast cancer have been mixed, our data suggest that selection of the right patients - those with dense breast tissue - may result in the appropriate context by which treatment with celecoxib might be more effective.
Consistent with the enhanced inflammatory environment of the collagen-dense tumors, we observed a dramatic increase in several cytokines in the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. Several granulocyte and macrophage-recruiting cytokines, including GM-CSF, G-CSF, MCP-1, MIP-1α and RANTES (CCL5), were increased in collagen-dense tumors. Moreover, there was a strong increase in IL-17A, which contributes to macrophage and neutrophil recruitment . IL-17A is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that is secreted by T helper (Th)17 cells and induces the production of other cytokines, growth factors, and prostaglandins from other cells, including fibroblasts . Also, IL-17A promotes angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and chemoresistance and it is associated with poor patient prognosis [40, 41]. We observed increased levels of IL-17R-A in the stroma of collagen-dense tumors, and these levels decreased after celecoxib treatment. Accordingly, decline of IL17A and its receptor expression levels after treatment with celecoxib was accompanied by declining populations of F4/80+ macrophages and Ly6g+ neutrophils. Recent findings demonstrate a role for COX-2 in the immune checkpoint, allowing melanomas to escape immune surveillance . Based on our findings that the collagen-dense microenvironment increases COX-2 and regulates inflammation, it is possible that a collagen-dense microenvironment will have a role in regulating the immune checkpoint as well.
PDGF-ββ is produced by epithelial and endothelial cells and stimulates nearby mesenchymal cells, including fibroblasts, in a paracrine fashion . Consistent with this, we observed significant over-expression of PDGF-ββ in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors compared to PyMT tumors, and COX-2 inhibition by celecoxib diminished this effect. COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib decreased αSMA+ fibroblasts in only the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors, even though this population was not significantly increased in the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. CAF secrete elevated levels of many growth factors, including β-NGF. The continuous secretion of β-NGF activates an autocrine loop whereby more fibroblasts are recruited . Additionally, β-NGF can be secreted by epithelial cells, macrophages, and neutrophils. Interestingly, we found that stromal β-NGF is elevated only in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors and COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib decreases β-NGF over-expression in both PyMT and collagen-dense tumors.
COX-2 also regulates increased collagen deposition. Treatment with celecoxib leads to a reversal of increased collagen deposition that occurs around tumors, even in the PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. This finding adds important insight into the mechanism of desmoplasia often observed around breast tumors. Moreover, these data are consistent with our observation that celecoxib diminished matrix deposition. Interestingly, Lyons et al. also demonstrated that COX-2 inhibition reduces the collagen deposition associated with tumor growth and progression to metastasis in the involuting mammary gland . Our results suggest that greater collagen deposition and elevated levels of COX-2 promote activation of more αSMA+ fibroblasts, which in turn elicit greater deposition of collagenous stroma. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that macrophages are associated with local regions of collagen deposition in the postpartum involuting mammary gland , suggesting that increased recruitment of macrophages could also contribute to elevated collagen deposition in PyMT/Col1a1 tumors. Consistent with this, we observed reduced numbers of CAF and F4/80+ macrophages when collagen-dense tumors were treated with celecoxib. These data suggest a feed-forward mechanism by which a collagen-dense microenvironment leads to greater COX-2 expression, increased inflammatory cells and CAF, and in turn, additional increased stromal deposition.
Celecoxib, with its anti-inflammatory effects, is associated with less risk of endoscopic mucosal injury  and decreased incidence of cardio-renal toxicity  compared with ibuprofen. There is evidence that COX-2 inhibitors can decrease breast cancer risk by 16 % . Thus, we tested whether celecoxib might be a candidate to consider for chemoprevention in women with dense breast tissue. Using no more than the maximum celecoxib dosage recommended by the FDA, we showed that COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib results in smaller and fewer tumors than treatment with vehicle alone in PyMT/Col1a1 mice. In addition, in PyMT/Col1a1 mice, treatment with celecoxib decreased expression of all 23 cytokines tested in our ELISA array. This indicates that COX-2 inhibition modulates several immune and stromal cell populations and delays tumor formation and progression. We recognize that this is not a true chemoprevention preclinical finding, as a major limitation of the PyMT mouse model is that it is a very aggressive genetically-driven model of mammary carcinoma. Thus, it would have been impossible to observe complete prevention of mammary tumors in this context.
There is evidence of the effect of celecoxib as a therapeutic agent for primary breast cancer. A randomized controlled phase II clinical trial demonstrated that preoperative treatment with celecoxib changes the expression of several genes at the transcription level in patients with invasive breast cancer when compared to placebo . Additionally, Fabi et al. found that treatment with celecoxib facilitates the tolerability of capecitabine, a drug that aids in the delivery of the anti-cancer agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Results from this phase II clinical trial showed that in patients with COX-2 over-expressing tumors the time to progression of disease and median overall survival was significantly longer with celecoxib treatment . Moreover, the increased gene expression of both COX-2 and collagen I is associated with decreased survival and a shorter time to development of metastasis . Added to these findings, our results suggest that COX-2 may be an effective preventive or therapeutic molecular target that will preferentially benefit women with dense breast tissue. A clinical trial to study the impact of celecoxib on women with dense breast tissue and high COX-2 expression would be of great clinical significance.
Our findings support a mechanism by which COX-2 modulates tumor progression in collagen-dense matrices and contributes to a more aggressive tumor microenvironment. In addition, in dense mammary tumors, COX-2 inhibition with celecoxib reduces tumor formation and growth, collagen deposition, and expression of several cytokines. These findings suggest that COX-2 has a direct role in modulating tumor progression specifically in tumors arising within collagen-dense microenvironments, but minimal effects in non-dense microenvironments. As dense breast tissue is a common occurrence, and promotes more aggressive tumors, these results suggest that COX-2 may be an effective therapeutic target for women with dense breast tissue.
epithelial growth factor
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Food and Drug Administration
formalin-fixed paraffin embedding
fibroblast growth factor beta
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (CSF-2)
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF-3)
Col1a1 tm1jae (mice carrying the collagenase transgene)
insulin growth factor
monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (CCL2)
macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (CCL3)
mouse mammary tumor virus
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
ordered-subset expectation maximization
platelet-derived growth factor ββ
positron emission tomography
prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2
polyomavirus middle T
regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (CCL5)
stem cell factor
tumor associated collagen signature-3
tumor necrosis factor alpha
vascular endothelial growth factor
alpha smooth muscle actin
nerve growth factor β
The project described was supported by the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, through the NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) UL1TR000427, and by R01 CA142833, U01 CA143069, and R01 CA179556 (PJK). The authors thank the University of Wisconsin Translational Research Initiatives in Pathology laboratory, in part supported by the UW Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and UW Carbone Cancer Center grant P30 CA014520, for use of its facilities and services. Also, we want to thank Beth Gray and Ruth Sullivan for histology services and the UW Small Animal Imaging Facility for PET imaging and analysis. Last, we thank Laura Hogan, Sally Drew, Doug Graham, Suzanne Ponik, Matt Conklin, and the Keely laboratory for their helpful insight and guidance.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Desantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2011. Cancer. 2011;61:409–18.Google Scholar
- Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998;7:1133–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin LJ, Melnichouk O, Guo H, Chiarelli AM, Hislop TG, Yaffe MJ, et al. Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:456–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyd NF. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2013;57–62.
- Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, dos Santos Silva I, McCormack V, Baglietto L, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):1-11.
- McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ursin G, Hovanessian-Larsen L, Parisky YR, Pike MC, Wu AH. Greatly increased occurrence of breast cancers in areas of mammographically dense tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7:R605–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Provenzano PP, Eliceiri KW, Campbell JM, Inman DR, White JG, Keely PJ. Collagen reorganization at the tumor-stromal interface facilitates local invasion. BMC Med. 2006;4:38.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Conklin MW, Eickhoff JC, Riching KM, Pehlke CA, Eliceiri KW, Provenzano PP, et al. Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:1221–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, Knittel JG, Yan L, Rueden CT, et al. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 2008;6:11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, Keely PJ. Matrix density-induced mechanoregulation of breast cell phenotype, signaling and gene expression through a FAK-ERK linkage. Oncogene. 2009;28(August):4326–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lyons TR, O’Brien J, Borges VF, Conklin MW, Keely PJ, Eliceiri KW, et al. Postpartum mammary gland involution drives progression of ductal carcinoma in situ through collagen and COX-2. Nat Med. 2011;17(July 2010):1109–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Howe LR. Inflammation and breast cancer. Cyclooxygenase/prostaglandin signaling and breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:210.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Denkert C, Winzer K-J, Müller B-M, Weichert W, Pest S, Köbel M, et al. Elevated expression of cyclooxygenase-2 is a negative prognostic factor for disease free survival and overall survival in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97:2978–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ristimäki A, Sivula A, Lundin J, Ristima A, Lundin M, Salminen T, et al. Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer advances in brief prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer 1. 2002;62:632–635.
- Mann JR, Backlund MG, DuBois RN. Mechanisms of disease: inflammatory mediators and cancer prevention. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005;2:202–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang WT, Lewis MT, Hess K, Wong H, Tsimelzon A, Karadag N, et al. Decreased TGFβ signaling and increased COX2 expression in high risk women with increased mammographic breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:305–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Larkins TL, Nowell M, Singh S, Sanford GL. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 decreases breast cancer cell motility, invasion and matrix metalloproteinase expression. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:181.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Karavitis J, Hix LM, Shi YH, Schultz RF, Khazaie K, Zhang M. Regulation of COX2 expression in mouse mammary tumor cells controls bone metastasis and PGE2-induction of regulatory T cell migration. PLoS One. 2012;7:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hu M, Peluffo G, Chen H, Gelman R, Schnitt S, Polyak K. Role of COX-2 in epithelial-stromal cell interactions and progression of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:3372–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu CH, Chang SH, Narko K, Trifan OC, Wu MT, Smith E, et al. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is sufficient to induce tumorigenesis in transgenic mice. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:18563–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smyth EM, FitzGerald GA. The eicosanoids: prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes, and related compounds. In: Katzung BG, Masters SB, Trevor AJ, editors. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 12th edition. McGraw Hill Medical; New York, USA. 2012. p. 313–29.
- Harris RE, Beebe-Donk J, Doss H, Burr DD. Aspirin, ibuprofen, and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in cancer prevention: a critical review of non-selective COX-2 blockade (review). Oncol Rep. 2005;13:559–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris RE, Beebe-Donk J, Alshafie GA. Cancer chemoprevention by cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) blockade: results of case control studies. Subcell Biochem. 2007;42:193–212.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sharpe CR, Collet JP, McNutt M, Belzile E, Boivin JF, Hanley JA. Nested case-control study of the effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on breast cancer risk and stage. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:112–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baron JA, Sandler RS, Bresalier RS, Quan H, Riddell R, Lanas A, et al. A randomized trial of rofecoxib for the chemoprevention of colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1674–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chow LWC, Yip AYS, Loo WTY, Lam CK, Toi M. Celecoxib anti-aromatase neoadjuvant (CAAN) trial for locally advanced breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;111:13–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Coogan PF, Palmer JR, Strom BL, Rosenberg L. Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and risk of breast cancer: the case-control surveillance study revisited. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:165–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giardiello F, Hamilton S, Krush A, Piantadosi S, Hylind LM, Celano P, et al. Treatment of colonic and rectal adenomas with sulindac in familial adenomatous polyposis. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1313–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thun M, Namboodiri M, Heath C. Aspirin use and reduced risk of fatal colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1593–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bertagnolli MM, Eagle CJ, Zauber AG, Redston M, Solomon SD, Kim K, et al. Celecoxib for the prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:873–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardiner SJ, Doogue MP, Zhang M, Begg EJ. Quantification of infant exposure to celecoxib through breast milk. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;61:101–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Turner S. Role of the selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract. 2004;89:ep46–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang W, Hennrick K, Drew S. A colorful future of quantitative pathology: validation of Vectra technology using chromogenic multiplexed immunohistochemistry and prostate tissue microarrays. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:29–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin EY, Jones JG, Li P, Zhu L, Whitney KD, Muller WJ, et al. Progression to malignancy in the polyoma middle T oncoprotein mouse breast cancer model provides a reliable model for human diseases. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:2113–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Guy CT, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Induction of mammary tumors by expression of polyomavirus middle T oncogene: a transgenic mouse model for metastatic disease. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:954–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Descamps S, Lebourhis X, Delehedde M, Boilly B, Hondermarck H. Nerve growth factor is mitogenic for cancerous but not normal human breast epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:16659–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Descamps S, Toillon RA, Adriaenssens E, Pawlowski V, Cool SM, Nurcombe V, et al. Nerve growth factor stimulates proliferation and survival of human breast cancer cells through two distinct signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:17864–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numasaki M, Fukushi J, Ono M, Narula SK, Zavodny PJ, Kudo T, et al. Interleukin-17 promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Blood. 2003;101:2620.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Numasaki M, Watanabe M, Suzuki T, Takahashi H, Nakamura A, McAllister F, et al. IL-17 enhances the net angiogenic activity and in vivo growth of human non-small cell lung cancer in SCID mice through promoting CXCR-2-dependent angiogenesis. J Immunol. 2005;175:6177–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cochaud S, Giustiniani J, Thomas C, Laprevotte E, Garbar C, Savoye A-M, et al. IL-17A is produced by breast cancer TILs and promotes chemoresistance and proliferation through ERK1/2. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3456.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zelenay S, Van Der Veen AG, Böttcher JP, Snelgrove KJ, Rogers N, Acton SE, et al. Cyclooxygenase-dependent tumor growth through evasion of immunity. Cell. 2014;162:1257–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heldin C-H. Targeting the PDGF signaling pathway in tumor treatment. Cell Commun Signal. 2013;11:97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kalluri R, Zeisberg M. Fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:392–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien J, Lyons T, Monks J, Lucia MS, Wilson RS, Hines L, et al. Alternatively activated macrophages and collagen remodeling characterize the postpartum involuting mammary gland across species. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1241–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Scheiman JM, Cryer B, Kimmey MB, Rothstein RI, Riff DS, Wolfe MM. A randomized, controlled comparison of ibuprofen at the maximal over-the-counter dose compared with prescription-dose celecoxib on upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:290–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashok V, Dash C, Rohan TE, Sprafka JM, Terry PD. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and breast cancer risk. Breast. 2011;20:66–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brandão RD, Veeck J, Van de Vijver KK, Lindsey P, de Vries B, van Elssen CH, et al. A randomised controlled phase II trial of pre-operative celecoxib treatment reveals anti-tumour transcriptional response in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R29.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fabi A, Metro G, Papaldo P, Mottolese M, Melucci E, Carlini P, et al. Impact of celecoxib on capecitabine tolerability and activity in pretreated metastatic breast cancer: Results of a phase II study with biomarker evaluation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;62:717–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar