Open Access

Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research20002:154

DOI: 10.1186/bcr48

Received: 20 March 2000

Accepted: 27 March 2000

Published: 1 June 2000

Abstract

Cells are continuously exposed to diverse stimuli ranging from soluble endocrine and paracrine factors to signalling molecules on neighbouring cells. Receptors of the tyrosine kinase family play an important role in the integration and interpretation of these external stimuli, allowing a cell to respond appropriately to its environment. The activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is tightly controlled, allowing a normal cell to correctly integrate its external environment with internal signal transduction pathways. In contrast, due to numerous molecular alterations arising during the course of malignancy, a tumour is characterized by an abnormal response to its environment, which allows cancer cells to evade the normal mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation. Alterations in the expression of various RTKs, in their activation, and in the signalling molecules lying downstream of the receptors play important roles in the development of cancer. This topic is the major focus of the thematic review section of this issue of Breast Cancer Research.

Keywords

cortactin ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases fibroblast growth factor receptor G-protein coupled receptors insulin-like growth factor-1 Src

Full text

Receptors of the tyrosine kinase family play an important role in the integration and interpretation of diverse extracellular stimuli, allowing a cell to respond appropriately to its environment. All members of this superfamily have in common an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single membrane-spanning region and a cytoplasmic protein tyrosine kinase domain. Ligand binding promotes receptor dimerization, consequently stimulating kinase activity and triggering autophosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues within the cytoplasmic domain (for review [1]). These phosphorylated residues serve as docking sites for proteins that are involved in regulation of intracellular signalling cascades. The activation of RTKs is generally tightly controlled, allowing a normal cell to integrate external stimuli with internal signal transduction pathways correctly. In contrast, due to numerous molecular alterations that arise during the course of malignancy, a tumour is characterized by an abnormal response to its environment, which allows cancer cells to evade the normal mechanisms that control cellular proliferation.

Alterations in RTK expression and activation, and in the signalling molecules that lie downstream of the receptors play important roles in the development of cancer. This topic is the major focus of the thematic review section of the present issue of Breast Cancer Research. In particular, Stern [2] writes on the interactions among the ErbB family members [epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor, ErbB2, ErbB3 and ErbB4]; Andrechek and Muller [3] present information gleaned from transgenic models of mammary cancer developed with Neu, the rat ErbB2 equivalent; and Prenzel et al [4] describe the emerging role of the EGF receptor as an integrator for other classes of membrane receptors. The non-RTK Src is hyperactive in breast cancer and, as discussed in the review by Biscardi et al [5], there is a cooperative interaction between Src and the EGF receptor, which very likely contributes to malignancy. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I signalling cascade and its interaction with the oestrogen receptor (ER) in breast tumours is discussed by Zhang and Yee [6], and the role of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and the cooperating Wnt signalling pathway in mammary mouse tumour virus (MMTV)-induced mouse mammary cancer is discussed by Dickson et al [7]. Finally, the signal transducers that lie downstream of the tyrosine kinases that have been implicated in breast cancer are reviewed by Kairouz and Daly [8].

It has been known for almost 15 years that deregulated expression of the EGF receptor and ErbB2 contribute to the development and malignancy of breast cancer. In fact, one of the first consistent genetic alterations found in breast tumours was c-erbB2 gene amplification [9]. The ErbB family has evolved from a single ligand-receptor combination in C elegans, through Drosophila, which have one receptor and four ligands, to vertebrates, in which four ErbB receptors bind multiple EGF-related ligands. Consequently, in vertebrates numerous ErbB homodimer and heterodimer combinations are possible, reflecting the greater complexity of receptors and ligands, and suggesting that they have evolved to provide the high degree of signalling diversity that is necessary for their development. This complex ErbB receptor-ligand network and its role in breast cancer is described in the article by Stern [2].

Src is overexpressed or highly activated in numerous types of human cancers, including breast cancer. Src physically interacts with both EGF receptor and ErbB2, and has been implicated in the transformation process induced by both RTKs. Evidence arising from various types of experiments indicates the significance of Src in normal EGF receptor signalling. Src plays an important role in EGF receptor activation, because it phosphorylates the receptor at Tyr 845 in the activation loop, stimulating its kinase activity [10]. Furthermore, Src and EGF receptor reciprocally interact and appear to cooperate in the process of malignancy [5]. The mechanism that underlies the Src-ErbB2 interaction is less clear than that described for Src-EGF receptor. However, mammary tumours from Neu transgenic mice display elevated Src kinase activity compared with the adjacent normal epithelium [11], suggesting that there is cooperativity in transformation.

As discussed in the article by Prenzel et al [4], RTKs do not act in isolation but are integral components in the complex signalling network that is necessary for the correct response of a cell to its environment. There is a wealth of data that show that EGF receptor in particular becomes activated, serving as a convergence point for other classes of membrane receptors, including G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), cytokine receptors and integrins. GPCR-induced EGF receptor activation has been considered to be ligand-independent because of the rapidity of the response, among other reasons. Intriguingly, it has recently been shown [12] that GPCR-mediated EGF receptor activation involves the stimulation of a metalloproteinase activity, which cleaves membrane-bound pro-HB-EGF, one of the ligands for EGF receptor, enabling it to bind and activate the kinase. Considering the abundance of EGF receptor ligands expressed in breast tumours, it is possible that autocrine EGF receptor activation may in some instances arise from GPCR-mediated ligand processing.

The signalling intermediates that act downstream of the tyrosine kinases involved in breast cancer have also come under scrutiny, as discussed in the article by Kairouz and Daly [8]. Most of these proteins, including phospholipase C (PLC)γ, Shc, Grb2 and Grb7, have SH2 or phosphotyrosine binding domains, allowing them to bind to specific phosphotyrosine residues in the activated RTKs. Many of these signalling intermediates lie downstream of the ErbB family and, not unexpectedly, some (eg PLCγ) show increased activity in tumours that overexpress ErbB RTKs. Interestingly, EMS1, the human homologue of the Src substrate cortactin, is amplified and overexpressed in approximately 15% of breast tumours [13]. Overexpression of cortactin increases cell motility, and this is dependent on Src-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation. These results imply that during the process of malignancy there is not only cooperativity between Src and ErbB RTKs, but also selection for overexpression of a Src substrate that very likely has a role in tumour progression, probably by increasing the invasive or metastatic potential of breast tumour cells.

IGF-I and its receptor have recently generated much interest because of the ability of the receptor to inhibit apoptosis and the central role that it plays in oncogenic transformation [14]. In fact it has been speculated that IGF-I receptor activation is necessary to repress apoptosis that would be induced by the uncontrolled activity of certain oncoproteins. The fact that many oncoproteins, including v-Src and EGF receptor, require functional IGF-I receptor to transform cells gives support to this hypothesis (for review [15]). The IGF-I receptor is expressed in virtually all breast tumours. In addition to its role in antiapoptic signalling moiety, there is a reciprocal interaction between the IGF-I system and ER, which is described in the article by Zhang and Yee [6]. This interaction leads to enhancement of the biological effects of oestrogens and IGFs. Specifically, oestrogens induce the expression of many of the players in the IGF-I network, including the IGF-I receptor and the downstream signalling protein insulin receptor substrate-1 [16], leading to an enhanced cellular response to IGF-I. In primary human breast cancers, insulin receptor substrate-1 levels correlate positively with ER levels. The negative effects of the antiestrogen tamoxifen on ER-positive tumour cells may in part be due to downregulation of these important IGF-I signalling molecules. Furthermore, high levels of IGF-I receptor signalling may impact on therapy, because the antiapoptotic effects of this pathway might protect tumour cells from radiation-induced death.

As discussed in the article by Dickson et al [7], there is conflicting data on the importance of the FGF receptor family in human breast cancer development. However, inappropriate expression of FGF receptor ligands has a clear role in murine mammary cancer. MMTV-induced murine models of cancer have been extremely useful, not only in discovering oncogenes that promote mammary cancer, but also for identifying oncogenes that cooperate in the induction of the tumours. MMTV induces cancer by insertional mutagenesis, leading to activation/mutation of genes at the genomic proviral insertion site. The first proto-oncogene identified by MMTV proviral insertion was Int-1/Wnt-1 [17]. An FGF family member, FGF-3, was found at another site of MMTV insertion, and it was soon recognized that many tumours contain proviruses at both Wnt-1 and FGF-3. These results suggest that the combination of inappropriate FGF receptor signalling and activation of Wnt-1 and its downstream transcription factor Tcf potently induces mammary cancer. In the future it will be important to determine the role of FGF receptor signalling in human breast cancer and to determine whether there is a collaboration between Wnt-1 signalling and any of the RTKs implicated in development of this malignancy.

A theme emerging from these articles is the concept of cooperativity during the transformation process. I would like to develop this idea using the ErbB RTKs as an example. It is worthwhile mentioning here that ErbB2 is the preferred heterodimeration partner for the other ErbB family members. ErbB2-containing heterodimers have more potent and prolonged signalling ability [18], providing an explanation for the propensity of this receptor to be overexpressed in human cancer. ErbB2 overexpression triggers ligand-independent activation of the kinase domain, apparently as a result of spontaneous dimer formation. Although ErbB2 homodimers alone very likely contribute to malignancy, a number of observations, many arising from the transgenic models of mammary cancer that are discussed in the article by Andrechek and Muller [3], suggest that ErbB2 cooperates with other ErbB receptors, including EGF receptor and ErbB3, during the malignant process. Many breast tumours that contain ErbB2 also exhibit autocrine stimulation of EGF receptor via expression of one of its numerous ligands (for review [19]). The ability of ErbB2 to potentiate EGF receptor signalling, due to the formation of EGF receptor-ErbB2 heterodimers, would provide tumour cells with a more potent growth stimulus and might lead to the activation of additional intracellular pathways. Furthermore, mammary tumours derived from Neu transgenic mice also exhibit co-overexpression of endogenous EGF receptor [20]. The ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimer appears to be the most potent ErbB dimer with respect to proliferation and transformation [21]. Moreover, mammary tumours from Neu transgenic mice exhibit selective upregulation of ErbB3 expression and activity, suggesting that there might be selective pressure for the ErbB2-ErbB3 heterodimer in mammary cancer development [22]. Very recent results from our laboratory indicate that overexpressed ErbB2 and ErbB3 cooperate during transformation [23] and as therapeutic targets [24].

As these articles should make apparent, our increasing knowledge on the specific molecular alterations in breast tumours has paved the way for the development of therapeutic agents that are customized to the tumour, recognizing and inhibiting the proteins responsible for the malignant phenotype. One exciting example of a rational, targeted approach to breast cancer treatment is HerceptinTM (Genentech, San Francisco, California, USA), a recombinant humanized antibody targeted to ErbB2. Its development as a therapeutic agent followed from experimental observations that certain antibodies that bind the extracellular domain of ErbB2 inhibit the growth of tumour cells that overexpress that receptor [25]. Herceptin has shown clinical efficacy in ErbB2-overexpressing breast cancer patients, and is now being used for the treatment of advanced breast cancer [26]. Finally, considering the concept of cooperativity between proteins that induce breast cancer, it is likely that therapeutic combinations directed at multiple molecular targets may prove to be more efficacious than monospecific therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Friedrich Miescher Institute

References

  1. Weiss A, Schlessinger J: Switching signals on or off by receptor dimerization. Cell. 1998, 94: 277-280. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81469-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stern DF: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: ErbB family receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 176-183. 10.1186/bcr51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrechek ER, Muller WJ: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: tyrosine kinase mediated signal transduction in transgenic mouse models of human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 211-216. 10.1186/bcr56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Prenzel N, Zwick E, Leserer M, Ullrich A: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: epidermal growth factor receptor: convergence point for signal transduction and diversification. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 184-190. 10.1186/bcr52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Biscardi JS, Ishizawar RC, Silva CM, Parsons SJ: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: epidermal growth factor receptor and c-Src interactions in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 203-210. 10.1186/bcr55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang X, Yee D: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 170-175. 10.1186/bcr50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickson C, Spencer-Dene B, Dillon C, Fantl V: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: fibroblast growth factors and their receptors. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 191-196. 10.1186/bcr53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kairouz R, Daly RJ: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: modulation of tyrosine kinase signalling in human breast cancer through altered expression of signalling intermediates. Breast Cancer Res. 2000, 2: 197-202. 10.1186/bcr54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, et al: Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with the amplification of the HER2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987, 235: 177-182.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Biscardi JS, Maa MC, Tice DA, et al: c-Src mediated phosphorylation of the epidermal growth factor receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 is associated with modulation of receptor function. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 8335-8343. 10.1074/jbc.274.12.8335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Muthuswamy SK, Muller WJ: Activation of Src family kinases in Neu-induced mammary tumors correlates with their association with distinct sets of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in vivo. Oncogene. 1995, 11: 1801-1810.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Prenzel N, Zwick E, Daub H, et al: EGF receptor transactivation by G-protein-coupled receptors requires metalloproteinase cleavage of proHB-EGF. Nature. 1999, 402: 884-888. 10.1038/47260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Schuuring E, Vernoeven E, Litvinov S, Michalides RJAM: The product of the EMS1 gene, amplified and overexpressed in human carcinoma, is homologous to a v-src substrate and is located in cell-substratum contact sites. Mol Cell Biol. 1993, 13: 2891-2898.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Baserga R: The insulin-like growth factor I receptor: a key to tumor growth?. Cancer Res. 1995, 55: 249-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrington EA, Fanidi A, Evan GI: Oncogenes and cell death. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1994, 4: 120-129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee AV, Jackson JG, Gooch JL, et al: Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor signaling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol. 1999, 13: 787-796. 10.1210/me.13.5.787.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nusse R, Varmus HE: Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982, 31: 99-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Graus-Porta D, Beerli RR, Daly JM, Hynes NE: ErbB-2, the preferred heterodimerization partner of all ErbB receptors, is a mediator of lateral signaling. EMBO J. 1997, 16: 1647-1655. 10.1093/emboj/16.7.1647.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Salomon DS, Brandt R, Ciardiello F, Normanno N: Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol. 1995, 19: 183-232. 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-I.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. DiGiovanna MP, Lerman MA, Coffey RJ, et al: Active signaling by Neu in transgenic mice. Oncogene. 1998, 17: 1877-1884. 10.1038/sj/onc/1202091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinkas-Kramarski R, Soussan L, Waterman H, et al: Diversification of Neu differentiation factor and epidermal growth factor signaling by combinatorial receptor interactions. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 2452-2467.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Siegel PM, Ryan ED, Cardiff RD, Muller W: Elevated expression of activated forms of Neu/ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 are involved in the induction of mammary tumors in transgenic mice: implications for human breast cancer. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 2149-2164. 10.1093/emboj/18.8.2149.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Neve RM, Sutterlüty H, Pullen N, et al: Effects of oncogenic ErbB2 on G1 cell cycle regulators in breast tumour cells. Oncogene. 2000,Google Scholar
  24. Lane HA, Beuvink I, Motoyama AB, et al: ErbB2 potentiates breast tumor proliferation through modulation of p27Kip1-Cdk2 complex formation: receptor overexpression does not determine growth dependency. Mol Cell Biol.
  25. Lewis GD, Figari I, Fendly B, et al: Differential responses of human tumor cell lines to anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 1993, 37: 255-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, et al: Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 1999, 27: 2639-2648.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Current Science Ltd 2000

Advertisement