Relationship between HER2 expression and efficacy with first-line trastuzumab emtansine compared with trastuzumab plus docetaxel in TDM4450g: a randomized phase II study of patients with previously untreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
© Perez et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 4 September 2013
Accepted: 7 April 2014
Published: 23 May 2014
The purpose of this study was to retrospectively explore the relationship between human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and efficacy in patients receiving trastuzumab plus docetaxel (HT) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1).
Patients with HER2-positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) were randomly assigned to HT (n = 70) or T-DM1 (n = 67). HER2 status was assessed locally using immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization and confirmed retrospectively by central testing. HER2 mRNA expression was assessed using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.
HER2 mRNA levels were obtained for 116/137 patients (HT = 61; T-DM1 = 55). Median pretreatment HER2 mRNA was 8.9. The risk of disease progression in the overall population was lower with T-DM1 than with HT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.97). This effect was more pronounced in patients with HER2 mRNA ≥ median (HR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.85) versus < median (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.67). In the T-DM1 arm, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in patients with HER2 mRNA ≥ median and was 10.6 months in patients with HER2 mRNA < median. In the HT arm, PFS was 8.8 versus 9.8 months in patients with HER2 mRNA ≥ median versus < median, respectively. The effect of HER2 mRNA expression on objective response rates was less pronounced.
This exploratory analysis suggests that while overall, patients with HER2-positive MBC show improved PFS with T-DM1 relative to HT, the effect is enhanced in patients with tumor HER2 mRNA ≥ median.
Adding human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents such as trastuzumab, trastuzumab and pertuzumab, or lapatinib to chemotherapy can improve clinical outcomes for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [1–5]. Despite receiving treatment with these agents, however, patients will eventually develop disease progression, and novel HER2-directed therapies are still needed.
Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), which was recently approved as a single agent for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC, is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising trastuzumab stably linked to DM1, which is a potent cytotoxic agent derived from the antimicrotubule agent maytansine . The trastuzumab component of T-DM1 targets the agent to HER2-expressing tumor cells, within which it is internalized and lysine-Nϵ-4 -MCC-DM1 is released intracellularly, resulting in microtubule instability and apoptosis [6, 7]. Like trastuzumab, T-DM1 also induces antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, inhibits HER2 pathway proliferative signaling, and inhibits HER2 shedding . In the pivotal phase III EMILIA trial (NCT00829166), patients with pretreated (trastuzumab and a taxane), HER2-positive locally advanced or MBC were randomly assigned to T-DM1 or capecitabine plus lapatinib . Patients who received T-DM1 had significant improvements in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those in the comparator arm . Significant improvements in PFS were also reported in the randomized phase II TDM4450g (BO21976; NCT00679341) study, in which patients with previously untreated MBC received either trastuzumab plus docetaxel (HT) or T-DM1 .
Results from exploratory analyses of single-arm, phase II studies of T-DM1 in patients with MBC (TDM4258g and TDM4374g) suggest that greater expression of HER2 messenger RNA (mRNA), which was assessed using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), may correlate with greater objective response rates (ORRs) and longer PFS [11, 12]. Here we report the results from an exploratory analysis of data from the TDM4450g (BO21976) study, to examine whether HER2 expression (assessed by qRT-PCR) correlates with clinical benefit reported in patients receiving treatment with T-DM1 in this study.
Materials and methods
Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age with unresectable, HER2-positive, locally advanced MBC and/or MBC that had not been treated with prior chemotherapy (prior hormonal therapy was allowed). Patients had measurable disease, as assessed by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors , an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Detailed information on the methodology employed in this study has been published elsewhere .
In this phase II, multicenter, open-label study, patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 3 weeks), or trastuzumab (8 mg/kg IV on cycle 1, day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 IV). Treatments were given until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study closure. The primary efficacy end point was investigator-assessed PFS. A number of exploratory end points were also investigated, including the relationship between the levels of HER2 mRNA expression and efficacy outcomes.
All participating study sites had institutional review board (IRB) approval of the protocol (see list of IRBs in Additional file 1). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the US Food and Drug Administration Good Clinical Practices, and local laws. All patients provided written informed consent.
Tumor HER2 status was established by local laboratory testing, using either immunohistochemistry (IHC; positive result: 3+ staining intensity in >10% of cells) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; positive result: HER2/chromosome 17 centromere ratio ≥2.0). Archival tumor tissue (paraffin block and/or slides) was also sent for central confirmation of HER2 status using FISH and IHC at Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH (Kassel, Germany), but central HER2 testing was not required for initiation of treatment. HER2 protein expression was assessed using the HercepTest™ kit (Dako North America, Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA). HER2 gene amplification was assessed using the standard PathVysion HER2 FISH kit (Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL, USA). Both methods were carried out in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions and with the instructions in the trastuzumab prescribing information .
Samples that were sent for central HER2 testing were also used for analysis of HER2 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR at the same central laboratory. To allow for analysis of mRNA as a continuous variable, mRNA expression was measured in samples from all randomly assigned patients regardless of the HER2 status established by central review. RNA was extracted and analyzed using the LightCycler® (Roche Applied Sciences, Mannheim, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The HER2 mRNA values obtained were relative to the housekeeping gene Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Methods used for tumor assessments and clinical outcomes have been published previously .
This study had a hypothesis-generating statistical design. The study sponsor collected and analyzed the data, authors were involved in the study design, and all authors had access to the primary data. Demographic variables and baseline characteristics were summarized by treatment arm and by treatment arm and HER2 mRNA expression. Pretreatment HER2 mRNA values were summarized by treatment arm. The hazard ratio (HR) of PFS comparing T-DM1 with HT and its 95% CI was estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model by HER2 mRNA subgroups. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS and median PFS were presented by HER2 mRNA subgroups. An estimate of the ORR was calculated for each treatment arm by HER2 mRNA subgroups.
Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate treatment effect adjusting for multiple prognostic baseline covariates. The variables tested in the model included age, race, world region, ECOG PS, progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen receptor (ER) status, central HER2 status, number of disease sites, disease measurability, disease-free interval, disease stage at initial diagnosis, menopausal status, prior anthracycline, prior taxane, prior trastuzumab, prior taxane and trastuzumab, prior taxane or trastuzumab, lung or liver involvement, prior hormonal therapy, prior radiotherapy, and HER2 mRNA (below the median versus equal to or higher than the median for the overall population). A stepwise procedure was used to determine the final model.
The database lock for the primary efficacy analysis took place on 15 November 2010 after 75 investigator-assessed PFS events had taken place in the two treatment arms combined, as pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan of the study.
Selected patient demographic and baseline characteristics by treatment arm
HT (n = 70)
T-DM1 (n = 67)
Median age, years (range)
52.0 (33 to 75)
55.0 (27 to 82)
World region, %
Central and South America
American Indian or Alaskan native
Other or not available
ECOG PS, %
HER2 status by central laboratory, % b
ER/PR status, %
ER-positive and/or PR-positive
ER-negative and PR-negative
ER and PR unknown
Stage at initial diagnosis, %
Stage I to III
Number of distinct sites of involvement
1 to 2
Lung or liver involvement. %
Disease-free interval, %
Prior treatment. %
Total number of prior chemotherapy agents, median (range)
3 (1 to 4)
3 (1 to 6)
Details of treatment duration and discontinuation have been published previously .
Of the 137 randomized patients, 127 (63 in the T-DM1 arm; 64 in the HT arm) had tumor samples analyzed centrally for confirmatory HER2 testing. Testing was performed on the primary tumor in 89 patients, on a metastatic lesion in 12 patients, and the status of the tumor (that is, primary or metastatic) was not reported or was unknown in 36 patients. At the time of this analysis 85.7% of patients in the T-DM1 arm and 85.9% of patients in the HT arm had confirmed centrally tested HER2-positive primary tumors. Valid results for the assessment of pretreatment HER2 mRNA were obtained for 116 patients, with 55 in the T-DM1 arm and 61 in the HT arm. Results for six samples were below the limit of quantification, and there was not enough tissue available to run the analyses for five patients. The median (range) pretreatment levels of HER2 mRNA in the overall patient population were 8.9 (0.4 to 105.0; units used were the concentration ratio). Median (range) pretreatment levels of HER2 mRNA were 10.3 (0.4 to 103.0) in the T-DM1 arm and 8.7 (0.5 to 105.0) in the HT arm.
Selected patient demographic and baseline characteristics by HER2 mRNA expression and treatment arm
HER2 mRNA < median (n = 58)
HER2 mRNA ≥ median (n = 58)
(n = 32)
(n = 26)
(n = 58)
(n = 29)
(n = 29)
(n = 58)
Median age, years (range)
(36 to 72)
(32 to 74)
32 to 74
(33 to 75)
(27 to 82)
(27 to 82)
World region, %
Race, % a
American Indian or Alaskan native
Other or not available
ECOG PS, %
HER2 status by central laboratory, %
ER/PR status, % a
ER-positive and/or PR-positive
ER-negative and PR-negative
ER and PR unknown
Number of distinct sites involved a
1 to 2
Among patients with HER2 mRNA expression equal to or greater than the median, a greater proportion of patients in the T-DM1 arm relative to the HT arm had ECOG PS of 0 (69.0% versus 57.1%) and more patients in the HT arm were white (86.2% versus 72.4%) (Table 2). Among patients with HER2 mRNA expression below the median, a greater proportion of patients in the T-DM1 arm relative to the HT arm had ECOG PS 0 (80.8% versus 62.5%), ER-negative/PR-negative tumors (42.3% versus 28.1%), and more than two sites of disease involvement (69.2% versus 56.3%).
Clinical outcomes by HER2 expression
The PFS benefit with T-DM1 in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive tumors (median PFS in the T-DM1 arm versus the HT arm 14.2 months versus 9.8 months; HR for PFS 0.57, 95% CI 0.32, 1.04) was similar to that seen in the overall study population (median PFS in the T-DM1 arm versus the HT arm 14.2 months versus 9.2 months; HR for PFS 0.59, 95% CI 0.36, 0.97).
Efficacy outcomes by tumor HER2 expression below the median and equal to or greater than the median
Median PFS, months
HR relative to HT (95% CI)
(n = 70)
(n = 67)
0.59 (0.36, 0.97)
(n = 32)
(n = 26)
0.85 (0.44, 1.67)
(n = 29)
(n = 29)
0.39 (0.18, 0.85)
HER2 expression a
Odds ratio relative to HT (95% CI)
(n = 69)
(n = 67)
1.26 (0.63, 2.55)
(n = 31)
(n = 26)
0.84 (0.30, 2.41)
(n = 29)
(n = 29)
1.58 (0.50, 4.98)
The risk of disease progression for all randomized patients was lower with T-DM1 than with HT (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36, 0.97) (Table 3). This effect was more pronounced in patients with tumor HER2 mRNA equal to or greater than the median (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18, 0.85) versus below the median (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44, 1.67). The magnitude of the difference in median PFS between the two treatment arms was greater in patients with tumors exhibiting HER2 expression equal to or greater than the median. Median PFS in patients with equal to or greater than the median HER2 expression was 8.8 months in the HT arm and was not reached in the T-DM1 arm (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18, 0.85). For patients with tumor HER2 expression below the median, median PFS was 9.8 months versus 10.6 months in the HT and T-DM1 arms, respectively (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.44, 1.67).
In the T-DM1 treatment arm, median PFS was numerically longer in patients with HER2 expression equal to or greater than the median compared with those with HER2 expression below the median (not reached versus 10.6 months, respectively). In the HT arm, duration of PFS was similar in patients with HER2 expression equal to or greater than the median and below the median (8.8 versus 9.8 months, respectively).
In the overall patient population, the ORR in the T-DM1 arm was numerically greater than that in the HT arm (64.2% versus 58.0%; odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.63, 2.55). For patients with tumor HER2 expression equal to or greater than the median, the ORR in the T-DM1 arm versus the HT arm was 72.4% versus 65.5% (odds ratio 1.58, 95% CI 0.50, 4.98). For patients with tumor HER2 expression below the median, the ORR was lower in the T-DM1 arm compared with the HT arm (53.8% versus 58.1%; odds ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.30, 2.41).Results from the multivariate analyses indicated that after adjusting for baseline factors, including HER2 mRNA expression, there is a trend in PFS benefit for treatment with T-DM1 (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41, 1.27).
The TDM4450g (BO21976) study showed that treatment with single-agent T-DM1 as first-line treatment for MBC significantly improves PFS with a more favorable safety profile compared with combined HT treatment . The PFS benefit was similar between the overall study population and in patients with centrally confirmed PFS in the primary analysis  as well as in this updated analysis (that is, data available from five additional patients) likely due to the relatively high concordance rate between local and central HER2 testing in this study. The retrospective and exploratory analysis reported here was carried out to investigate the relationship between the efficacy benefit of T-DM1 compared with HT and HER2 mRNA expression levels in TDM4450g. The results suggest that while T-DM1 provides clinical benefit in patients with HER2-positive tumors by standard criteria, the magnitude of efficacy of T-DM1 versus HT may be more pronounced in patients with tumors that exhibit HER2 mRNA expression above the median. This correlation suggests that high HER2 mRNA expression that results in higher expression of HER2 protein could lead to greater receptor presence on the cell surface that in turn may result in increased delivery of the cytotoxic agent DM1.
The results obtained from our analysis also highlight the importance of using the best available test to establish HER2 status. At present, patients are selected for HER2-targeted treatment based on the results of HER2 testing of their primary tumor, which is most commonly determined using either IHC or FISH . In both cases, the result of HER2 testing is given as either positive or negative, and patients with HER2-positive tumors are considered to be eligible for treatment with an HER2-targeted agent. It is therefore imperative that individuals conducting HER2 testing ensure that the results they obtain are as accurate as possible. Our results suggest that qRT-PCR may be able to provide a more quantitative assessment of HER2 expression that could be used in addition to the standard tests for determining tumor HER2 status.
The findings from our exploratory analysis are hypothesis-generating only and should be interpreted with caution because of the limitations in the design of study TDM4450g. For example, the sample size was relatively small for each of the subgroups (fewer than 33 patients for all subgroups). These subgroup analyses are not statistically powered to detect a difference, their main purpose being to evaluate consistency of the effect across subgroups and to generate hypotheses to be tested in phase III studies. The study may also have been subject to bias, being open-label in design with investigator-assessed end points. Nevertheless, a potential association between HER2 mRNA expression and response to therapy has been reported in two phase II studies of single-agent T-DM1 [11, 12]. In both of these studies, the median PFS was longer and the ORRs were greater in patients with HER2 mRNA expression at or greater than the median compared with those reported in patients with HER2 mRNA expression below the median. It is important to bear in mind, however, that both of those studies were also relatively small (approximately 25 to 35 patients per HER2 mRNA group) and had single-arm designs. Finally, in the majority of patients, HER2 mRNA was determined on tissue from the primary tumor. HER2 expression may have changed in the metastatic lesions. Such changes in HER2 expression have been documented [16, 17]. However, these changes in HER2 expression appear to occur in a small number of patients (10% to 15%) [16, 17]. We were unable to assess the potential influence of changes in HER2 expression in our study because of the small number of patients with tissue samples from metastatic sites.
The provocative data obtained in our study require validation in phase III trials. Preliminary results from EMILIA (TDM4370g/BO21977) presented at the American Association for Cancer Research suggest that the magnitude of the OS benefit with T-DM1 versus lapatinib plus capecitabine may be correlated with HER2 mRNA level . Further analyses of HER2 mRNA expression in EMILIA, as well as in the ongoing phase III MARIANNE (TDM4788g/BO22589) and TH3RESA (TDM4997g/BO25734) trials, will help to evaluate further the correlation between this marker and clinical outcomes.
In this exploratory analysis, we analyzed the relationship between tumor HER2 mRNA expression level and efficacy in patients receiving HT or T-DM1 in a randomized phase II study. While patients treated with T-DM1 had a lower risk of disease progression relative to HT-treated patients regardless of whether their tumors expressed high (equal to or greater than the median) or low (below the median) HER2 mRNA, the benefit was more pronounced in patients with high HER2 mRNA. If validated in phase III studies, these results suggest that there may be a subgroup of patients with an exceptional response to T-DM1 based on high HER2 mRNA expression levels.
Presented in part at the 2012 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress, Vienna, Austria, 28 September to 2 October 2012. EA Perez, SA Hurvitz, LC Amler, V Ng, E Guardino, L Gianni. Exploratory analysis of the relationship between HER2 expression (by qRT-PCR) and efficacy with first-line trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in a randomized phase 2 study of patients with HER2-positive MBC. Poster 226P.
- ECOG PS:
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status
fluorescence in situ hybridization
human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
trastuzumab plus docetaxel
metastatic breast cancer
objective response rate
quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
The authors would like to thank all of the patients who participated in clinical study TDM4450g and their families. They would also like to thank C Linehan and Drs B Klencke and S Agresta for support with study design and implementation. This study was sponsored by Genentech, Inc. and was designed by Genentech, Inc., in collaboration with the investigators. Authors who were not employees of Genentech were not compensated for their participation in the study, or for writing the manuscript. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript, furnished by Katherine Cashell, was provided by Genentech, Inc.
The following Institutional Review Boards approved the study at their respective sites: Argentina: Comité de Bioética de la Escuela Latinoamericana de Bioética, Comite Indep. De Etica Para Ensayos En Farmacolog., Ethics comitee CAICI - CIAP, IADT ETHICS, Teaching and research committee; Austria: EK des Landes Vorarlberg, Ethikkomission der stadt Wien, Ethikkommission der Universität Wien/AKH; Belgium: Comité d’Ethique de la Clinique & Maternité Ste Elisabeth, Comité d’Ethique Institut Jules Bordet; Unité de chimiothérapie, Comité d’Ethique Notre Dame Reine Fabiola, Commission d’Ethique biomedicale Hospitalo-Facultaire, Sint-Augustinus Commissie voor Medische Ethiek; Brazil: CEP da fundação Antonio Prudente - Hospital AC Camargo, Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa, Comitê de Ética da fundação Mário Penna - Hospital Luxemburgo, Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da PUCRS, Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Universeidade do Vale do Itajaí (UNIVALI), Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Hospital Santa Cruz, Comitê de Ética em Pesquisaem Seres Humanos da Maternidade climatério de Oliveira; Chile: Comité de Ética Cientifico del Servicio de Salud Araucania Sul, Comité de Ética Científico del Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Oriente, Comité de Ética Clinica Reñaca, Comite de Etica Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Oriente; Germany: EK Baden-Württemberg LÄK, EK Hessen LÄK, Ethik-Kommission der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Fakultät, der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Ethik-Kommission der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Ethik-Kommission der Universität Ulm, Ethikkommission des FB Medizin, Ethik-Kommission Rostock, Institut für Rechtsmedizin, rEK Bayern LÄK; Hungary: Medical Research Council, Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology; Israel: Helsinki Committee - Assaf Harofeh, Helsinki Committee - Kaplan, Helsinki Committee - Meir, Helsinki Committee - Rambam, Helsinki Committee - Shaare Zedek, Helsinki Committee - Sheba, Helsinki Committee - Western Galilee, Helsinki committee Hadassah EK, Sourasky Medical Centre Ethics Committee; Italy: CE Az. Az. Osp. Univ. S.M. Della Misericordia, Comitato Etico dell’IRCCS Fondazione SRMTM, Comitato Etico Indipendente della Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Comitato Etico Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Comitato Etico Provinciale Modena, Comitato Etico Unico Per La Provincia Di Parma; Mexico: Comité Bioética/Comité Científico-Inst Nacional de Cancer, Comité de Calidad de la atención médica y credenciales, enseñanza, investigación, capacitación y éti; Peru: CE para la Invest. Univ de San Martín de Porres, Comité de Bioética de la Red Assistencial Sabogal - ESSALUD, Comité de ética de Investigación del Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, Comité de Etica del Hospital Rebagliati, Comité de Ética en Inv HNGAI, Comité Institucional de Ética en Investigación Maria Auxiliadora; Poland: Komisja Bioetyczna przy Okregowej Izbie Lekarskiej; Spain: CEIC Hospital de Cruces, CEIC Hospital La Fe de Valencia, Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de Aragón, Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de Galicia - Subdirección Xeral de Farmacia e Produtos Sanitar, Comité Ético de Investigación Clínica de La Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (CEIC-E); United Kingdom: Dorset Research Ethics Committee, Newcastle and North Tyneside Research Ethics Committee 2, Oxfordshire REC, South Manchester Local Research Ethics Committee; United States: Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board, Biomedical Research Alliance of New York, LLC (BRANY), California Pacific Medical Center, Carolinas Healthcare Systems IRB, Christiana Care Health System IRB, Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (Stony Brook University Cancer Center), Copernicus Group IRB, Health Sciences IRB (University of Missouri-Columbia), Mayo Clinic Institutional Rev Bd Rochester, MD Anderson Cancer Center Office of Protocol Research, Nebraska Methodist Hospital IRB, Rush University Medical Center RCTA, Siouxland Institutional Review Board, St. John’s Mercy Medical Center IRB, St. Joseph Mercy Health System Clinical Research Committee, UCLA Office for Protection of Research Subjects, University of Alabama at Birmingham/Western IRB, University of Maryland Baltimore Office of Research Subjects, University of Minnesota - Research Subjects’ Protection Programs, Western Institutional Review Board WIRB Panel 7, West Michigan Cancer Center.
- Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 783-792. 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, Snyder R, Mauriac L, Tubiana-Hulin M, Chan S, Grimes D, Antón A, Lluch A, Kennedy J, O'Byrne K, Conte P, Green M, Ward C, Mayne K, Extra JM: Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 4265-4274. 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.173.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, Chan S, Romieu CG, Pienkowski T, Jagiello-Gruszfeld A, Crown J, Chan A, Kaufman B, Skarlos D, Campone M, Davidson N, Berger M, Oliva C, Rubin SD, Stein S, Cameron D: Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 2733-2743. 10.1056/NEJMoa064320.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, Im SA, Hegg R, Im YH, Roman L, Pedrini JL, Pienkowski T, Knott A, Clark E, Benyunes MC, Ross G, Swain SM, CLEOPATRA Study Group: Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 109-119. 10.1056/NEJMoa1113216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swain SM, Kim S-B, Cortés J, Ro J, Semiglazov V, Campone M, Ciruelos E, Ferrero JM, Schneeweiss A, Knott A, Clark E, Ross G, Benyunes MC, Baselga J: Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA study): overall survival results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013, 14: 461-471. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70130-X.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lewis Phillips GD, Li G, Dugger DL, Lewis Phillips GD, Li G, Dugger DL, Crocker LM, Parsons KL, Mai E, Blättler WA, Lambert JM, Chari RV, Lutz RJ, Wong WL, Jacobson FS, Koeppen H, Schwall RH, Kenkare-Mitra SR, Spencer SD, Sliwkowski MX: Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008, 68: 9280-9290. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1776.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- LoRusso PM, Weiss D, Guardino E, Girish S, Sliwkowski MX: Trastuzumab emtansine: a unique antibody-drug conjugate in development for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 6437-6447. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Junttila TT, Li G, Parsons K, Phillips GL, Sliwkowski MX: Trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) retains all the mechanisms of action of trastuzumab and efficiently inhibits growth of lapatinib insensitive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011, 128: 347-356. 10.1007/s10549-010-1090-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, Pegram M, Oh DY, Diéras V, Guardino E, Fang L, Lu MW, Olsen S, Blackwell K, EMILIA Study Group: Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012, 367: 1783-1791. 10.1056/NEJMoa1209124. Erratum in N Engl J Med 2013, 368:2442View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hurvitz SA, Dirix L, Kocsis J, Bianchi GV, Lu J, Vinholes J, Guardino E, Song C, Tong B, Ng V, Chu YW, Perez EA: Phase II randomized study of trastuzumab emtansine versus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013, 31: 1157-1163. 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.9694. Erratum in J Clin Oncol 2013, 31:2977View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burris HA, Rugo HS, Vukelja SJ, Vogel CL, Borson RA, Limentani S, Tan-Chiu E, Krop IE, Michaelson RA, Girish S, Amler L, Zheng M, Chu YW, Klencke B, O'Shaughnessy JA: Phase II study of the antibody drug conjugate trastuzumab-DM1 for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer after prior HER2-directed therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2011, 29: 398-405. 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krop I, LoRusso P, Miller KD, Modi S, Yardley D, Rodriguez G, Guardino E, Lu M, Zheng M, Girish S, Amler L, Winer EP, Rugo HS: A phase II study of trastuzumab emtansine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab, lapatinib, an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine. J Clin Oncol. 2012, 30: 3234-3241. 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5902.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauser EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 205-216. 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Genentech I: Herceptin (trastuzumab) Package Insert. 2012, South San Francisco, CA: Genentech, IncGoogle Scholar
- Perez EA, Reinholz MM, Hillman DW, Tenner KS, Schroeder MJ, Davidson NE, Martino S, Sledge GW, Harris LN, Gralow JR, Dueck AC, Ketterling RP, Ingle JN, Lingle WL, Kaufman PA, Visscher DW, Jenkins RB: HER2 and chromosome 17 effect on patient outcome in the N9831 adjuvant trastuzumab trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 4307-4315. 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2154.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fabi A, Di Benedetto A, Metro G, Perracchio L, Nisticò C, Di Filippo F, Ercolani C, Ferretti G, Melucci E, Buglioni S, Sperduti I, Papaldo P, Cognetti F, Mottolese M: HER2 protein and gene variation between primary and metastatic breast cancer: significance and impact on patient care. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 2055-2064. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1920.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiao C, Gong Y, Han EY, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Sneige N: Stability of HER2-positive status in breast carcinoma: a comparison between primary and paired metastatic tumors with regard to the possible impact of intervening trastuzumab treatment. Ann Oncol. 2011, 22: 1547-1553. 10.1093/annonc/mdq623.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baselga J, Verma S, Ro J, Huober J, Guardino E, Fang L, Olsen S, Lewis Phillips G, de Haas S, Pegram M: Relationship between tumor biomarkers and efficacy in EMILIA, a phase 3 study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. Cancer Res. 2013, 73 (suppl 8): nr LB-63-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.