Open Access

DACT1, an antagonist to Wnt/β-catenin signaling, suppresses tumor cell growth and is frequently silenced in breast cancer

  • Xuedong Yin1,
  • Tingxiu Xiang1,
  • LiLi Li2,
  • Xianwei Su2,
  • Xingsheng Shu2,
  • Xinrong Luo1,
  • Jianbo Huang1,
  • Ying Yuan1,
  • Weiyan Peng1,
  • Michael Oberst3,
  • Kathleen Kelly3,
  • Guosheng Ren1Email author and
  • Qian Tao1, 2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
Breast Cancer Research201315:R23

DOI: 10.1186/bcr3399

Received: 30 August 2012

Accepted: 5 March 2013

Published: 12 March 2013

Abstract

Introduction

Aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays an important role in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. DACT1 (Dapper/Frodo) has been identified as involved in antagonizing Wnt/β-catenin signaling through interacting with Dishevelled (Dvl), a central mediator of Wnt signaling, whereas its role in breast tumorigenesis remains unclear.

Methods

We examined DACT1 expression in breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors with semiquantitative or quantitative RT-PCR and immunochemistry, and further evaluated the promoter methylation of DACT1 with methylation-specific PCR (MSP). We also explored the tumor-suppressive functions of DACT1 in vivo and in vitro, and its related mechanism in breast cancer.

Results

We identified DACT1 as a methylated target in our breast cancer epigenome study. Here, we further investigated DACT1 expression in multiple breast cell lines and primary tumors, and further studied its function and molecular mechanisms. We found that DACT1 expression was silenced in eight (88.9%) of nine breast cancer cell lines, and its protein levels were obviously reduced in breast tumors compared with paired surgical-margin tissues. Promoter CpG methylation of DACT1 was detected in five (55.6%) of nine breast cancer cell lines and 40 (29.9%) of 134 primary tumors, but not in surgical-margin tissues and normal breast tissues. Demethylation treatment of breast cancer cell lines restored DACT1 expression along with promoter demethylation, suggesting that an epigenetic mechanism mediates DACT1 silencing in breast cancer. Functional assays showed that ectopic expression of DACT1 could inhibit breast tumor cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro through inducing apoptosis, and further suppress tumor cell migration through antagonizing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that DACT1 could function as a tumor suppressor but was frequently downregulated in breast cancer.

Introduction

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among females [1], and results from accumulated genetic and epigenetic alterations of various cancer genes, including tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs) and oncogenes [2]. Epigenetic alterations, especially CpG promoter methylation, play important roles in the initiation and progression of multiple cancers including breast cancer. Hypermethylation of CpG island (CGI) in the promoter regions of TSGs is an alternative mechanism for TSG silencing and could occur early in tumorigenesis, thus serving as a promising tumor marker for breast cancer diagnosis [3]. Aberrant promoter methylation of some TSGs, such as RASSF1A, BRCA1, TWIST, Cyclin D2, and p16, has been shown to be good biomarkers for the early detection or for a therapeutic target in breast cancer [4, 5].

Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays an important role in multiple tumorigenesis, including breast cancer [6]. Epigenetic silencing of negative regulators of WNT signaling is crucial for the aberrant activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling in tumor pathogenesis [5, 7]. DACT1, a homologue of Dapper, located at chromosomal region 14q23.1, was first identified as a Dishevelled (Dvl)-associated antagonist of Wnt/β-catenin and JNK signaling pathways [8, 9], DACT1 is expressed during embryonic development in the adult brains of mice [10, 11], but studies on its role in tumorigenesis are scanty. DACT1 has been shown to be reduced in several tumors, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors [12] and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [13], but overexpressed in some other tumors [14, 15]. Dysregulated DACT1 was associated with poor prognosis in tumor patients [13]. DACT1 was also reported to be a novel inhibitor of the WNT/β-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [16]. However, its expression and biologic functions in breast cancer pathogenesis are unknown.

We identified DACT1 as a methylated target in the MB231 breast cancer cell line as compared with normal tissue in our pilot cancer epigenome study. Here, we further examined the expression and promoter methylation of DACT1 in multiple breast cell lines and primary tumors, and evaluated its potential as a tumor biomarker for breast cancer. We further demonstrated the biologic functions of DACT1 in breast cancer cells in vivo and in vitro in the context of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Materials and methods

Cell lines, tumor samples, and normal tissues

Several breast cancer cell lines (BT549, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, MCF-7, T47D, SK-BR-3, YYC-B1, YCC-B3, and ZR-75-1) were studied. All cell lines were maintained at 37°C in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 U/ml of penicillin, and streptomycin.

Normal human breast tissue RNA samples were purchased commercially (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA; Millipore Chemicon, Billerica, MA, USA; BioChain Institute, Hayward, CA, USA). Primary breast tumor samples, paired surgical-margin tissues, and normal breast tissues were obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, or elsewhere, as described previously [1719]. All samples were evaluated and subject to histologic diagnosis by pathologists. Clinical information, including age, tumor grade, tumor size, follow-up data after initial diagnosis, and treatment, was obtained for the majority of tumor cases. Grading of tumors was achieved by staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). All patients provided written consent for the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Approval notice: 2010/2012(23)).

Semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was isolated from cell lines by using TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA). Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed as described previously [20]. GAPDH was amplified as a control. Primer sequences are listed in Table 1. RT-PCR was performed with 32 cycles for DACT1, and 23 cycles for GAPDH, by using Go-Taq (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Table 1

List of primers used in this study

PCR

Primer

Sequence (5'-3')

Product size (bp)

PCR cycles

Annealing temperature (°C)

MSP

DACT1m3

CGGGATAGTAGTAGTCGGC

118

41

60

 

DACT1m4

CGCTAAAACTACGACCGCG

   
 

DACT1u3

GTTGGGATAGTAGTAGTTGGT

123

41

58

 

DACT1u4

AAACACTAAAACTACAACCACA

   

RT-PCR

DACT1-F

AGGAGAAGTTCTTGGAGGAG

179

32

55

 

DACT1-R

TGAGCTAGGCCGACTGTCTG

   
 

GAPDH-F

GGAGTCAACGGATTTGGT

206

23

55

 

GAPDH-R

GTGATGGGATTTCCATTGAT

   

Real-time PCR

DACT1-F

GACGAGCAGAGCAATTACACC

158

40

60

 

DACT1-R

ACCGTTTGAATGGGCAGA

   
 

β-actin-F

CCTGTGGCATCCACGAAACT

314

40

60

 

β-actin-R

GAAGCATTTGCGGTGGACGAT

   

5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine and trichostatin A treatment

Cell lines were treated with 10 mM 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Aza; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 3 days or further treated with 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA; Cayman Chemical Co., Ann Arbor, MI, USA) for 14 hours.

DNA bisulfite treatment and methylation-specific PCR

Genomic DNA was extracted from tumors, normal tissues, and cell pellets by using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Bisulfite modification of DNA and methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were performed as described previously [21, 22]. Bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by MSP with DACT1 methylation-specific primer set for DACT1 promoter (Table 1), by using AmpliTaq-Gold DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Methylated and unmethylated MSP primer sets target the same CpG sites and do not amplify genomic DNA with no bisulfite treatment.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Real-time PCR (rtPCR) was performed by using Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) (Table 1). Thermal-cycling reaction was performed in the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Melting-curve analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products were further performed. Relative expression levels of DACT1 in breast tissues were standardized to β-actin levels.

Tissue microarray and immunohistochemistry

To evaluate DACT1 expression in breast tissues, tissue microarray (TMA) was used as described previously, containing 30 pairs primary tumors and corresponding tumor-margin tissues [18]. Immunohistochemistry was performed by using a two-step method. In brief, after deparaffinization, sections were hydrated and underwent sodium citrate antigen retrieval. Sections were then incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidase activity. A rabbit polyclonal antibody against human DACT1 protein (Ab104.4; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used. Sections were incubated with primary antibody (1:200 dilution) overnight at 4°C, detected by using polyperoxidase-anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA), and counterstained with hematoxylin. To eliminate nonspecific staining, a negative control was performed with PBS.

All immunohistochemical photographs were analyzed by using Image Pro Plus (IPP, version 6.0; Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA), as described previously [18]. The mean optical density (OD), as a quantitative measure of stain intensity, was analyzed to determine average protein expression.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-DACT1 or pcDNA3.1 plasmid were grown on glass coverslips. Transfected cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 minutes, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS at 37°C for 60 minutes. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in TBST at 4°C for 12 hours, washed twice with PBS, and then incubated with DyLight-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody (CoWin Biotech Co., Ltd. (CWBIO), Beijing, China) for an additional 50 minutes. Nuclei were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Roche, Palo Alto, CA, USA).

Cell-proliferation assay

MB231 cells were cultured in six-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and allowed to grow overnight. Cultures were then transfected with pcDNA3.1-DACT1 or pcDNA3.1 plasmid by using Lipofectamine-2000 (Invitrogen). At 24, 48, and 72 hours, cell proliferation was measured by using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc., Kumamoto, Japan) [23].

Colony-formation assay

Colony-formation assay was performed by using a monolayer culture. Cells (MB231 and MCF7) were plated in six-well plates and transfected with pcDNA3.1-DACT1 or pcDNA3.1 (4 μg each) plasmid by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). At 48 hours after transfection, cells were collected, replated, and selected for 2 weeks in the presence of G418 (0.4 mg/ml). Surviving colonies (≥50 cells/colony) were counted after staining with gentian violet. All experiments were performed 3 times.

Wound-healing assay

DACT1 and vector-expressing cells (MB231 and MCF7) were selected by using G418, and then cultured in six-well plates until confluent. After scratching the monolayer, cells were photographed at 0, 12, 24, 36, 42, and 48 hours under a 10× objective (Leica DMI4000B, Milton Keynes, Bucks, UK).

Caspase-3 colorimetric assay

Cells were seeded in six-well plates and transfected with pcDNA3.1-DACT1 or pcDNA3.1 plasmid, and then collected and lysed for protein purification at 24 or 48 hours. Total protein extraction was performed for analyzing active caspase-3 by using Caspase-3 Colorimetric Assay Kits (KeyGen Biotech Co, Nanjing, China).

Western blot

Transfected cells were lysed in M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Pierce, Thermo Scientific, Cramlington, UK) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma Aldrich). A total of 50 μg of protein lysate for each sample was separated by using sodium dodecylsulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The lysates were then transferred to PVDF membranes for antibody incubation. After blocking with 5% nonfat milk and 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS, the membranes were incubated with DACT1 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), or antibodies to active β-catenin (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), cyclin D1, c-Myc, cleaved caspase 3, and cleaved PARP (Epitomics Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA). The immunoblots were visualized by using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system. GAPDH was used as a control.

In vivo tumor model

Stable DACT1-expressing MB231 cells or controls (1 × 106 cells in 0.2 ml PBS) were subcutaneously injected into the right dorsal flank of female nude mice (6 weeks old, six mice per group). The weight of nude mice was measured every 7 days for 4 weeks. The xenograft tumor weight was assessed at the terminal time. The protocols for in vivo animal experiment were approved by the Committee on Ethical Use of Animals of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 16 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Student t test was used to analyze the difference of DACT1 expression between breast cancer tissues and surgical margin tissues. χ2 test and Fisher Exact test were used to assess the correlation between DACT1 methylation and clinicopathologic parameters. For all the tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

DACT1 is frequently reduced in breast cancer

We first examined DACT1 expression in a panel of human normal adult tissues and fetal tissues, as well as breast cancer cell lines, by using semiquantitative RT-PCR. Results showed that DACT1 was widely expressed in human normal tissues and fetal tissues, including normal breast tissues (Figure 1A, C), but was frequently silenced or downregulated in breast cancer cell lines studied (Figure 1C).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Expression and promoter methylation of DACT1 in breast cancer. (A) DACT1 expression in human normal adult and fetal tissues as detected by semiquantitative RT-PCR, with GAPDH as a control. (B) Schematic structure of the DACT1 promoter CpG island (CGI). Exon 1 (gray rectangle), CpG sites (short vertical lines), transcription start site (curved arrow), and MSP sites analyzed are indicated. (C) DACT1 was silenced by promoter methylation in breast cancer cell lines, but readily expressed in normal breast tissues. (D) Pharmacologic demethylation with Aza combined with TSA (A+T) restored DACT1 expression in breast cancer cell lines. M, methylated; U, unmethylated.

DACT1 expression in primary breast tumors was further examined at the RNA and protein levels. We found that DACT1 mRNA was obviously downregulated in breast cancer tissues, compared with normal breast tissues (*P < 0.01), as measured with qPCR (Figure 2A). IHC was then performed to examine DACT1 expression in 30 cases of primary tumors and paired surgical-margin tissues (Figure 2B). An IPP system showed that the mean optical density of DACT1 protein expression was significantly decreased in primary breast tumors (0.222 ± 0.060), compared with that in surgical-margin tissues (0.287 ± 0.054) (***P < 0.001) (Figure 2C).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

DACT1 was downregulated in primary breast tumors. (A) Analysis of DACT1 expression in normal breast tissues and primary breast tumors by using real-time PCR. (B) Representative immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for DACT1 in paired breast tumors and surgical-margin tissues. Magnification, 400×. (C) The mean optical density of DACT1 expression in each case (left panel). Quantitative analysis of DACT1 expression density is shown as values of mean ± SD (right panel). ***P < 0.001. (D, E) GSA-tumor analysis of DACT1 by using the 1,881-sample breast cancer data set. Box plot of DACT1 expression for tumor samples stratified according to Hu subtypes, ER status, and histologic grade.

We further assessed DACT1 expression by using the Gene expression-based Outcome for Breast Cancer Online (GOBO) database [24]. Gene-Set Analysis (GSA)-Tumor showed that DACT1 is differently expressed among different subtypes of breast cancer, with relatively high expression in a normal-like subtype (P < 0.00001; Figure 2D). Furthermore, decreased expression of DACT1 was associated with ER- and higher histologic grade (P < 0.00001, Figure 2E). These results indicate that DACT1 expression is frequently downregulated in breast cancer and associated with clinicopathologic features.

Promoter methylation of DACT1 contributes to its downregulation in breast cancer

We next evaluated whether DACT1 repression was due to promoter methylation. A typical CpG island spanning the proximal promoter and exon 1 regions of the DACT1 gene was found (Figure 1B). MSP showed that DACT1 was methylated in five breast cancer cell lines (MB231, MB468, MCF7, T47D, and YCC-B1), although no methylation was found in another two cell lines (SK-BR-3 and ZR-75-1) with silenced DACT1 (Figure 1C). Pharmacologic demethylation was used to assess whether promoter methylation directly regulates DACT1 expression. Three cell lines (MB231, MCF7, and T47D) with methylated and silenced DACT1 were treated with Aza and/or histone deacetylase inhibitor TSA. After treatment, DACT1 expression was increased, accompanied by decreased methylated alleles of DACT1 (Figure 1D). The results indicate that promoter methylation is a major mechanism for DACT1 silencing in breast cancer cells.

DACT1 is methylated in breast primary tumors

We further investigated DACT1 methylation in primary tumors, surgical-margin tissues, and normal breast tissues. DACT1 methylation was detected in 40 (29.9%) of 134 breast cancer tissues, but not in surgical-margin tissues and normal breast tissues (Figure 3, Table 2), suggesting a tumor-specific methylation of DACT1 in breast cancer. We next analyzed the correlation between DACT1 methylation and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer patients, including age, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node metastasis, status of estrogen receptor (ER), progestogen receptor (PR), and HER2. However, no significant correlation between DACT1 methylation and clinicopathologic features was found (Table 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Representative methylation-specific PCR (MSP) analysis of DACT1 methylation in primary breast tumors, surgical margin tissues, and normal tissues. M, methylated; U, unmethylated.

Table 2

Promoter methylation status of DACT1 in primary breast tumors

Tissue

Samples (number)

DACT1promoter

Frequency of methylation

  

Methylated

Unmethylated

 

Breast cancer tissues

134

40

94

40/134 (29.9%)

Breast cancer surgical-margin tissues

11

0

11

0/11 (0%)

Normal breast tissues

15

0

15

0/15 (0%)

Table 3

DACT1 methylation and clinicopathologic features of breast tumors

Clinicopathologic features

Number (N= 134)

DACT1methylation status

Pvalue

  

Methylated

Unmethylated

 

Age (years)

≤40

11

2

9

0.229

 

> 40

86

30

56

 
 

Unknown

37

8

29

 

Tumor grade

I

7

2

5

0.425

 

II

56

21

35

 
 

III

5

1

4

 
 

Unknown

66

16

50

 

Tumor size

≤2.0 cm

44

14

30

0.21

 

≥2.0 cm, ≤5.0 cm

48

18

30

 
 

> 5.0 cm

4

0

4

 
 

unknown

38

8

30

 

Lymph node metastasis

Positive

43

16

27

0.38

 

Negative

41

12

29

 
 

Unknown

50

12

38

 

Distant metastasis

Positive

1

1

0

0.114

 

Negative

98

32

66

 
 

Unknown

35

7

28

 

ER status

Positive

45

17

28

0.274

 

Negative

29

9

20

 
 

Unknown

60

14

46

 

PR status

Positive

34

11

23

0.296

 

Negative

40

15

25

 
 

Unknown

60

14

46

 

HER2 status

Positive

42

15

27

0.148

 

Negative

28

11

17

 
 

Unknown

64

14

50

 

ER, estrogen receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2; PR, progesterone receptor.

Ectopic expression of DACT1 inhibits breast cancer cell growth

DACT1 repression by promoter methylation in breast cancer indicated that DACT1 is likely a tumor suppressor. Immunostaining showed that DACT1 is located mainly in the cytoplasm and membrane of DACT1-expressing MB231 cells (Figure 4A). Colony-formation assay and CCK-8 cell-proliferation assay were further performed to assess the effect of DACT1 on cell proliferation of breast cancer. About 40% to 60% reduction of colony numbers was observed in DACT1-transfected MB231 and MCF7 cells, compared with controls (*P < 0.05) (Figure 4B). Cell viability was significantly decreased at 24, 48, and 72 hours after transfection with DACT1 in MB231 cells (**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05) (Figure 4C).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Tumor-suppressive functions of DACT1 in breast cancer cells. (A) Subcellular localization of DACT1 in MB231 cells was detected with immunofluorescence. (B) Representative colony-formation assay of DACT1 in MB231 and MCF7 (left panel). Quantitative analyses of colony numbers are shown as values of mean ± SD. *P < 0.05 (right panel, upper). DACT1 expression as measured with RT-PCR in vector- and DACT1-transfected MB231 and MCF7 cells (right panel, lower). (C) Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay assessed the effect of DACT1 on cell proliferation in vector-, and DACT1- expressing MB231 cells. The values are shown as the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. (D) The colorimetric assay for active caspase-3 was performed in vector-, and DACT1-expressing MB231 and MCF7 breast cancer cells at 24 and 48 hours.

To evaluate the molecular mechanism of DACT1 in the inhibition of cell proliferation, caspase-3 colorimetric assay was used. Results indicated that the concentration of active caspase-3 was increased in DACT1-expressing MB231 and MCF7 cells, compared with controls (**P < 0.01) (Figure 4D), as further confirmed by upregulated cleaved caspase-3 and cleaved PARP (Figure 5C). Thus, DACT1 is a functional TSG, inhibiting tumor cell growth and inducing cell apoptosis of breast cancer.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

DACT1 suppressed β-catenin activity and upregulated apoptotic markers. (A, B) Subcellular location of active β-catenin in vector- and DACT1-expressing MB231 cells by immunostaining. (C) Western blot analysis of β-catenin signaling components and apoptotic markers.

DACT1 decreases β-catenin activity and suppresses breast cancer cell migration

We next investigated whether DACT1 could counteract Wnt/β-catenin signaling for its tumor-suppressive function. Expression and localization of active β-catenin were examined with immunostaining and Western blot. Reduced expression of active β-catenin and its downstream target gene c-MYC were detected in DACT1-expressing MB231 cells (Figure 5), suggesting that DACT1 antagonizes Wnt/β-catenin signaling by decreasing active β-catenin levels in breast cancer.

As the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays a key role in tumor metastasis, the effect of DACT1 on cell migration was further analyzed. Wound-healing assay showed that MB231 and MCF7 cells migrated into scraped areas within 42 and 48 hours, whereas DACT1 expression decreased their wound closure by about 55% after 42 hours and about 70% after 48 hours in these two cell lines (Figure 6), suggesting that DACT1 attenuates the wound-induced cell migration of breast cancer.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Wound-healing assay for cell motility of vector - or DACT1 -transfected MB231 and MCF7 cells. Upper: Representative images of wound sealing at 0 hours and 42 or 48 hours after wound scratch. Lower: The percentage of wound sealing compared with that of controls at each time point as indicated.

DACT1 inhibits breast tumor growth in vivo

Further to evaluate the tumor-suppressive functions of DACT1 in vivo, tumorigenicity of MB231 cells expressing DACT1 was evaluated in nude mice. Thirty days after injection, tumors were excised from tested mice for further analysis. The average volume of tumors induced by DACT1-expressing MB231 cells was significantly decreased, compared with control tumors (**P < 0.01; Figure 7A, B). Immunohistochemistry was further performed to analyze the expression of DACT1 and cell-proliferation marker Ki-67 in xenograft tumors. Numerous tumor cells with higher nuclear fragmentation were observed in H&E-stained sections from DACT1-expressing MB231 cells compared with controls, along with decreased proliferating cells (Figure 7C). These results indicate that DACT1 does act as a tumor suppressor in breast tumorigenesis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fbcr3399/MediaObjects/13058_2012_Article_3207_Fig7_HTML.jpg
Figure 7

DACT1 inhibited the tumorigenicity of breast cancer in vivo. (A) Tumors derived from vector- (black arrows), and DACT1-expressing (red arrows) MB231 cells in nude mice. (B) Tumor growth curve of DACT1-expressing cells in nude mice compared with control tumors. **P < 0.01. (C) Representative photographs of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of DACT1 and Ki-67 antigen in tumors of nude mice. Magnification, 400×.

Discussion

From this study, we report that DACT1 is widely expressed in normal breast tissues but frequently downregulated/silenced by promoter methylation in breast cancer. DACT1 is methylated in 29.9% of primary breast tumors, but not in surgical-margin tissues and normal breast tissues. DACT1 inhibits breast cancer cell proliferation by inducing apoptosis, and further suppresses tumor-cell migration through downregulating β-catenin activity, thus functioning as a tumor suppressor for breast cancer.

Epigenetic disruption of TSGs, including promoter methylation and histone modification, is a key mechanism regulating cancer gene expression [25, 26]. DACT1 was frequently downregulated by promoter methylation in HCC, whereas another DACT family member, DACT3, was repressed by bivalent histone modifications in colon cancer [16, 27]. We report that DACT1 was frequently methylated in breast cancer cell lines and primary tumors, which was correlated with its downregulation/silencing. No methylation was detected in some breast cell lines with silenced DACT1, suggesting that histone modifications or other mechanisms may be alternative mechanisms for DACT1 downregulation in some settings.

The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays an important role in tumor proliferation and migration [6]. Dact1 (Dapper), originally identified as an interacting protein for Dishevelled (Dvl), has been involved in distinct Wnt-dependent developmental processes of Xenopus, zebrafish, and mice [8, 11, 2830]. Dact1 antagonizes Wnt signaling by binding with Dvl and promoting its degradation. Notably, this inhibitory activity is conserved from Xenopus to humans [8, 9, 31, 32]. DACT1 has been identified disrupting the expression and localization of β-catenin, thus dysregulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling in NSCLC [13]. We found that DACT1, located mainly in the cytoplasm and membrane, reduced the expression of active β-catenin and its downstream target gene c-MYC in breast cancer cells, thus inhibiting cell proliferation of breast cancer by inducing apoptosis, as well as tumor cell migration.

DACT1 has been reported as a potential tumor marker associated with poor prognosis of NSCLC [13]. We observed tumor-specific methylation of DACT1 in breast cancer, indicating its potential as a tumor marker, although no obvious correlation between its methylation and clinicopathologic features was found, which must be further confirmed by a large sample-sized study. Future study of circulating methylated DACT1 in serum or in combination with other methylated TSGs may be performed for the detection of breast cancer [5, 33, 34].

Conclusions

In summary, DACT1, as a Wnt/β-catenin signaling antagonist, is frequently downregulated/silenced in breast cancer, acting as a functional tumor suppressor in breast tumorigenesis, and may serve as a potential tumor marker for breast cancer.

Notes

Abbreviations

Aza: 

5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine

CGI: 

CpG island

DAPI: 

4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

Dvl: 

Dishevelled

ER: 

estrogen receptor

H&E: 

hematoxylin and eosin

HCC: 

hepatocellular carcinoma

IHC: 

immunohistochemistry

IPP: 

Image Pro Plus

MSP: 

methylation-specific PCR

NSCLC: 

non-small cell lung cancer

OD: 

optical density

PR: 

progesterone receptor

qRT-PCR: 

quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium dodecylsulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TMA: 

tissue microarray

TSA: 

trichostatin A

TSG: 

tumor-suppressor gene.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Sun Y. Rha for some breast cancer cell lines. This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171243, 81072148, and 81172582), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (2010BB5101) and the Group Research Scheme of The Chinese University of Hong Kong (3110085).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
(2)
Cancer Epigenetics Laboratory, Department of Clinical Oncology, Sir YK Pao Center for Cancer and Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong and CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute
(3)
Signal Transduction Section, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
(4)
Cancer Center, Dalian Medical University

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61: 69-90. 10.3322/caac.20107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Feinberg AP, Tycko B: The history of cancer epigenetics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004, 4: 143-153.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Hinshelwood RA, Clark SJ: Breast cancer epigenetics: normal human mammary epithelial cells as a model system. J Mol Med. 2008, 86: 1315-1328. 10.1007/s00109-008-0386-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Hoque MO, Prencipe M, Poeta ML, Barbano R, Valori VM, Copetti M, Gallo AP, Brait M, Maiello E, Apicella A, Rossiello R, Zito F, Stefania T, Paradiso A, Carella M, Dallapiccola B, Murgo R, Carosi I, Bisceglia M, Fazio VM, Sidransky D, Parrella P: Changes in CpG islands promoter methylation patterns during ductal breast carcinoma progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18: 2694-2700. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0821.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Xiang TX, Yuan Y, Li LL, Wang ZH, Dan LY, Chen Y, Ren GS, Tao Q: Aberrant promoter CpG methylation and its translational applications in breast cancer. Chin J Cancer. 2013, 32: 12-20.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Reya T, Clevers H: Wnt signalling in stem cells and cancer. Nature. 2005, 434: 843-850. 10.1038/nature03319.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ying Y, Tao Q: Epigenetic disruption of the WNT/beta-catenin signaling pathway in human cancers. Epigenetics. 2009, 4: 307-312. 10.4161/epi.4.5.9371.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheyette BN, Waxman JS, Miller JR, Takemaru K, Sheldahl LC, Khlebtsova N, Fox EP, Earnest T, Moon RT: Dapper, a Dishevelled-associated antagonist of beta-catenin and JNK signaling, is required for notochord formation. Dev Cell. 2002, 2: 449-461. 10.1016/S1534-5807(02)00140-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhang L, Gao X, Wen J, Ning Y, Chen YG: Dapper 1 antagonizes Wnt signaling by promoting dishevelled degradation. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281: 8607-8612. 10.1074/jbc.M600274200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Okerlund ND, Kivimae S, Tong CK, Peng IF, Ullian EM, Cheyette BN: Dact1 is a postsynaptic protein required for dendrite, spine, and excitatory synapse development in the mouse forebrain. J Neurosci. 2010, 30: 4362-4368. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0354-10.2010.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher DA, Kivimae S, Hoshino J, Suriben R, Martin PM, Baxter N, Cheyette BN: Three Dact gene family members are expressed during embryonic development and in the adult brains of mice. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 2620-2630. 10.1002/dvdy.20917.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Astolfi A, Nannini M, Pantaleo MA, Di Battista M, Heinrich MC, Santini D, Catena F, Corless CL, Maleddu A, Saponara M Lolli C, Di Scioscio V, Formica S, Biasco G: A molecular portrait of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an integrative analysis of gene expression profiling and high-resolution genomic copy number. Lab Invest. 2010, 90: 1285-1294. 10.1038/labinvest.2010.110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang ZQ, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Zhang JY, Zhang S, Jiang GY, Zhang PX, Yang LH, Liu D, Li QC, Wang EH: Downregulation of HDPR1 is associated with poor prognosis and affects expression levels of p120-catenin and beta-catenin in nonsmall cell lung cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2010, 49: 508-519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yuan G, Wang C, Ma C, Chen N, Tian Q, Zhang T, Fu W: Oncogenic function of DACT1 in colon cancer through the regulation of beta-catenin. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e34004-10.1371/journal.pone.0034004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hou J, Li EM, Shen JH, Qing Z, Wu ZY, Xu XE, Wu JY, Qiao H, Shen J, Guo MZ, Xu LY: Cytoplasmic HDPR1 is involved in regional lymph node metastasis and tumor development via beta-catenin accumulation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011, 59: 711-718. 10.1369/0022155411409941.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Yau TO, Chan CY, Chan KL, Lee MF, Wong CM, Fan ST, Ng IO: HDPR1, a novel inhibitor of the WNT/beta-catenin signaling, is frequently downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma: involvement of methylation-mediated gene silencing. Oncogene. 2005, 24: 1607-1614. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208340.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiang T, Li L, Fan Y, Jiang Y, Ying Y, Putti TC, Tao Q, Ren G: PLCD1 is a functional tumor suppressor inducing G(2)/M arrest and frequently methylated in breast cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010, 10: 520-527. 10.4161/cbt.10.5.12726.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Xiang T, Li L, Yin X, Yuan C, Tan C, Su X, Xiong L, Putti TC, Oberst M, Kelly K, Ren G, Tao Q: The ubiquitin peptidase UCHL1 induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through stabilizing p53 and is frequently silenced in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e29783-10.1371/journal.pone.0029783.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Jin H, Wang X, Ying J, Wong AH, Cui Y, Srivastava G, Shen ZY, Li EM, Zhang Q, Jin J, Kupzig S, Chan AT, Cullen PJ, Tao Q: Epigenetic silencing of a Ca(2+)-regulated Ras GTPase-activating protein RASAL defines a new mechanism of Ras activation in human cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104: 12353-12358. 10.1073/pnas.0700153104.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ying J, Li H, Seng TJ, Langford C, Srivastava G, Tsao SW, Putti T, Murray P, Chan AT, Tao Q: Functional epigenetics identifies a protocadherin PCDH10 as a candidate tumor suppressor for nasopharyngeal, esophageal and multiple other carcinomas with frequent methylation. Oncogene. 2006, 25: 1070-1080. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209154.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tao Q, Swinnen LJ, Yang J, Srivastava G, Robertson KD, Ambinder RF: Methylation status of the Epstein-Barr virus major latent promoter C in iatrogenic B cell lymphoproliferative disease: application of PCR-based analysis. Am J Pathol. 1999, 155: 619-625. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65157-7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tao Q, Huang H, Geiman TM, Lim CY, Fu L, Qiu GH, Robertson KD: Defective de novo methylation of viral and cellular DNA sequences in ICF syndrome cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2002, 11: 2091-2102. 10.1093/hmg/11.18.2091.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Oda T, Hayano T, Miyaso H, Takahashi N, Yamashita T: Hsp90 regulates the Fanconi anemia DNA damage response pathway. Blood. 2007, 109: 5016-5026. 10.1182/blood-2006-08-038638.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ringner M, Fredlund E, Hakkinen J, Borg A, Staaf J: GOBO: gene expression-based outcome for breast cancer online. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e17911-10.1371/journal.pone.0017911.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones PA, Baylin SB: The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 2007, 128: 683-692. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.029.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baylin SB, Ohm JE: Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer: a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction?. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006, 6: 107-116.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiang X, Tan J, Li J, Kivimae S, Yang X, Zhuang L, Lee PL, Chan MT, Stanton LW, Liu ET, Cheyette BN, Yu Q: DACT3 is an epigenetic regulator of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer and is a therapeutic target of histone modifications. Cancer Cell. 2008, 13: 529-541. 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.04.019.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Katoh M: Identification and characterization of human DAPPER1 and DAPPER2 genes in silico. Int J Oncol. 2003, 22: 907-913.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Waxman JS, Hocking AM, Stoick CL, Moon RT: Zebrafish Dapper1 and Dapper2 play distinct roles in Wnt-mediated developmental processes. Development. 2004, 131: 5909-5921. 10.1242/dev.01520.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Suriben R, Fisher DA, Cheyette BN: Dact1 presomitic mesoderm expression oscillates in phase with Axin2 in the somitogenesis clock of mice. Dev Dyn. 2006, 235: 3177-3183. 10.1002/dvdy.20968.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gloy J, Hikasa H, Sokol SY: Frodo interacts with Dishevelled to transduce Wnt signals. Nat Cell Biol. 2002, 4: 351-357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen H, Liu L, Ma B, Ma TM, Hou JJ, Xie GM, Wu W, Yang FQ, Chen YG: Protein kinase A-mediated 14-3-3 association impedes human Dapper1 to promote dishevelled degradation. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 14870-14880. 10.1074/jbc.M110.211607.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Skvortsova TE, Rykova EY, Tamkovich SN, Bryzgunova OE, Starikov AV, Kuznetsova NP, Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP: Cell-free and cell-bound circulating DNA in breast tumours: DNA quantification and analysis of tumour-related gene methylation. Br J Cancer. 2006, 94: 1492-1495. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603117.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ushijima T: Detection and interpretation of altered methylation patterns in cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005, 5: 223-231. 10.1038/nrc1571.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ying et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.