Circulating tumor cells, disease recurrence and survival in newly diagnosed breast cancer
© Franken et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 March 2012
Accepted: 15 October 2012
Published: 22 October 2012
The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTC) is an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival and breast cancer-related death (BRD) for patients with metastatic breast cancer beginning a new line of systemic therapy. The current study was undertaken to explore whether the presence of CTC at the time of diagnosis was associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and BRD.
In a prospective single center study, CTC were enumerated with the CellSearch system in 30 ml of peripheral blood of 602 patients before undergoing surgery for breast cancer. There were 97 patients with a benign tumor, 101 did not meet the inclusion criteria of which there were 48 patients with DCIS, leaving 404 stage I to III patients. Patients were stratified into unfavorable (CTC ≥1) and favorable (CTC = 0) prognostic groups.
≥1 CTC in 30 ml blood was detected in 15 (15%) benign tumors, in 9 DCIS (19%), in 28 (16%) stage I, 32 (18%) stage II and in 16 (31%) patients with stage III. In stage I to III patients 76 (19%) had ≥1 CTC of whom 16 (21.1%) developed a recurrence. In 328 patients with 0 CTC 38 (11.6%) developed a recurrence. Four-year RFS was 88.4% for favorable CTC and 78.9% for unfavorable CTC (P = 0.038). A total of 25 patients died of breast cancer-related causes and 11 (44%) had ≥1 CTC. BRD was 4.3% for favorable and 14.5% for unfavorable CTC (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis ≥1 CTC was associated with distant disease-free survival, but not for overall recurrence-free survival. CTC, progesterone receptor and N-stage were independent predictors of BRD in multivariate analysis.
Presence of CTC in breast cancer patients before undergoing surgery with curative intent is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer-related death.
With 1.15 million new cases each year, breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women worldwide . Patients with non-metastatic breast cancer are treated surgically with or without adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant treatments are only indicated if they significantly reduce the risk for recurrence. Risk assessment is of utmost importance because of the well-known side effects of adjuvant treatment and is being conducted by means of TNM classification and differentiation grade complemented by estrogen and progesterone receptor status, Her2neu expression and peritumoral vascular invasion [2–6]. More recent improvement of the risk assessment is obtained through the molecular characterization of the tumor and identifies patients who are predicted to obtain the most therapeutic benefit [7–15]. These methods identify genetic phenotypes with a higher likelihood for micrometastasis that can lead to disease recurrence. Detection of the actual presence of tumor cells beyond the primary tumor is preferred, but may not be sufficient, as one cannot distinguish between dormant tumor cells and those giving rise to recurrence of the disease [16, 17]. The presence of micrometastases in bone marrow of breast cancer patients is associated with an increased risk for disease recurrence and death [18, 19]. Detection of bone marrow micrometastasis has, however, not been adapted as standard in clinical practice . A more attractive approach for the detection of the presence of tumor cells beyond the primary tumor is the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC). For CTC detection a validated method is available  and several studies have demonstrated that the presence of CTC in patients with metastatic breast cancer is associated with a significantly shorter progression-free and overall survival [22–29]. In these studies, CTC can be found in approximately 70% of metastatic breast cancer patients. Before receiving neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer the frequency in which CTC are detected is significantly lower (approximately 20%), and their presence was associated with a significant risk for recurrence . The purpose of this study is to examine the frequency of CTC in non-metastatic breast cancer and determine whether their presence is associated with an increased recurrence rate or breast cancer-related death (BRD).
Materials and methods
In this single-blind prospective study, 602 patients were enrolled before surgery for a breast tumor with curative intend. To increase the sensitivity, 30 ml of blood was drawn in all patients into four CellSave preservative tubes (Veridex, Raritan, NJ, USA) before surgery to measure CTC. Patients who were 18 years or older, had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and clinical stage I to III breast cancer were included in the study. Patients who were found to have a benign tumor after histological analysis of the removed tumor were placed in a control group. Patients with the following characteristics were excluded: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), other malignancies at the time of inclusion or within five years prior to inclusion except skin malignancy other than melanoma or cervical carcinoma in situ, patients with stage IV breast cancer at inclusion, male breast cancer. All patients were treated in accordance with Dutch national guidelines . According to these guidelines, adjuvant systemic treatment (hormonal therapy or chemotherapy) is indicated in node-positive patients, node-negative patients younger than 35 except those with a grade I tumor ≤ cm, patients of 35 years and older with a tumor larger than 1 cm and patients older than 35 except those with a grade I (and grade II until 2010) between 1 and 2 cm. Chemotherapy was advised up to 70 years old followed by hormonal therapy. Adjuvant Online  was used to calculate survival increase due to chemotherapy and, if this was found insignificant, chemotherapy was omitted. During the study, the chemotherapy regimen was changed from anthraclines-based to regimens that also included taxanes. Trastuzumab treatment was given for one year. There was no difference in treatment between CTC-positive and CTC-negative patients since treating physicians were blinded for CTC results. Follow-up was also in accordance with these guidelines: every three months in the first year with a yearly mammogram, every six months in the second year with a yearly mammogram, once a year from three to five years with yearly mammogram. After five years, all patients younger than 60 were seen yearly with a mammogram. For patients older than 60 this was once every two years. The ethics board of Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands approved the study protocol and all patients provided informed consent. We expected that 25% of patients would have CTC and a recurrence rate of 10% in the CTC-negative group and 20% in the CTC-positive group. For 80% power we calculated a sample size of 500 patients. A minimal follow-up period of six months was chosen. Body Mass Index was not captured and thus not considered in our analysis.
The CellSearch system (Veridex, Raritan, NJ, USA) was used to measure CTC. Four 7.5 ml aliquots of each patient were analyzed within 72 hours after blood draw. This system immunomagnetically enriches CTC from 7.5 ml of blood targeting the epithelial cell adhesion molecules (EpCAM). The enriched cells are labeled with the nucleic acid dye 4',6-diaminodino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and antibodies specific for leukocytes (CD45) labeled with allophycocyan (APC) and specific for epithelial cells (cytokeratin 8, 18, 19) labeled with phycoerythrin (PE). Images of CTC candidates were captured by a semi-automatic magnetic fluorescence microscope and presented to experienced operators for classification as CTC when the cells were larger than 4 μm, expressed cytokeratin and lacked CD45 . The operators were blinded to the clinical status of the patient.
Two databases were created, one with the results of the CTC analysis, patient ID and inclusion date and one with the clinical data from the patient charts; both were merged at the time of the analysis at the hospital. The following clinical data were included: age, menopausal status, tumor stage on basis of pTNM classification, estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) status, Her2Neu receptor status, differential grade of the tumor based on the Bloom-Richardson method, adjuvant treatment, date of recurrence if occurred, location of recurrence (local versus distant), date of breast cancer-associated death or non-breast cancer-associated death. ER and PR positivity was defined at 10% or more. Her2Neu positivity was defined as 3+ of 2+ with confirmation. The time until recurrence was defined as the time between date of inclusion and the date on which the recurrence was objectified with an appropriate diagnostic test. Follow-up time was defined as the time between inclusion date and the date of the last checkup. Patients with no objectified recurrence at the end of follow-up were considered free of recurrence. SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Somers, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Factors that have influence on recurrence, distant disease-free survival and breast cancer-related survival, were identified and placed in a multivariate logistic regression model to identify independent predictors of recurrence, distant recurrence and breast cancer-related death. In these models, all univariate significant variables were included and after step-by-step elimination of the least significant variable while observing less than 10% change in regression coefficient, a final model was reached for both recurrence and breast cancer-related death. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and breast cancer-related death. The log-rank test was used to compare patients with and without CTC. For categorical variables the chi-square test was used. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. A P value smaller then 0.05 was used to indicate a significant difference. All tests are two-sided.
Patient characteristics, demographics and relation to recurrence-free survival and breast cancer-related death.
Ad chemo TX 4
Ad rad TX 5
Ad hor TX 6
BC mortality 7
Prevalence of circulating tumor cells.
Association between presence of CTC, disease recurrence and survival
Univariate analysis for disease recurrence and survival
The significance of stage, histology, differentiation, menopausal status, age, ER, PR and Her2/neu status, adjuvant therapy and CTC for RFS and BRD is shown in Table 1. T-stage, N-stage, overall stage, differential grade, ER status, PR status, Her2neu status and CTC were significant for RFS and BRD. For CTC a cutoff value of 1 or more CTC was chosen. If similar analyses are performed with higher cutoff values than CTC is no longer significant. This is probably due to the small number of patients that had 2 or more CTC.
Multivariate analysis for disease recurrence and survival
Final model of multivariate Cox regression analysis for prediction of recurrence-free survival among univariately significant parameters.
CTC 0 vs ≥1
Final model of multivariate Cox regression analysis for prediction of distant disease-free survival among univariately significant parameters.
CTC 0 vs ≥1
ER pos vs neg
Final model of multivariate Cox regression analysis for prediction of breast cancer-related death.
CTC 0 vs ≥1
PR neg vs pos
Improvement of the success rate of cancer therapy requires accurate selection of patients that will benefit from certain therapies. However, despite the array of biomarkers some low-risk patients will die from distant metastasis, whereas some high-risk patients will survive for decades. Although risk profile based on biomarkers can help to improve the ability to discriminate between low- and high-risk patients, accurate detection whether or not the tumor has actually already disseminated would be preferred. Micrometastasis in the bone marrow at diagnosis is detected in approximately 30% of breast cancer patients, their presence is independent of disease stage and is associated with an increased risk for disease recurrence [18, 19]. Screening for occult metastatic tumor cells in the bone marrow has, however, not been included as standard clinical routine . Reasons are that it is regarded as too invasive and no validated methods are available to reliably enumerate disseminated tumor cells routinely in clinical laboratories. Detection of tumor cells in the blood is an attractive alternative as a validated method is available and the presence of CTC in breast cancer patients with metastatic disease has shown to be an independent prognostic factor for progression-free and overall survival [22, 28, 29]. The frequency of CTC is, however, low and only 52% of patients starting first-line chemotherapy have 5 or more CTC in 7.5 ml of blood . In patients prior to pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgery the frequency is even lower and 1 or more CTC were detected in 7.5 ml of blood in 23 to 24% of these patients [29, 33]. In the ongoing German SUCCESS study, 21% of patients at primary diagnosis of breast cancer, 1 or more CTC were detected in 23 ml of blood [34, 35]. In this study, four 7.5 ml aliquots of blood from four blood collection tubes were investigated for the presence of CTC to increase the sensitivity of CTC detection with the FDA-cleared CellSearch CTC test. The fourfold increase in blood volume was chosen as a lesser increase in blood volume was not likely to provide sufficient benefit . A recent study suggest that this blood volume is still not sufficient to detect intact nucleated, EpCAM+, cytokeratin 8,18 or 19+, CD45 CTC in all patients suggesting the need for 'CTC' apheresis or in vivo detection of CTC . One or more CTC in 30 ml of blood were detected in 76 of the 404 (19%) patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. Of the 602 patients undergoing breast surgery, 48 were diagnosed with DCIS and surprisingly the proportion of DCIS patients in which CTC were detected was the same (19%) as in stage I and II cancer. The percentage of patients with detectable CTC was lower (15%) in the 97 patients with benign disease. In the control group from the original studies in metastatic breast cancer patients, 8% of patients with benign breast tumors and 4% of healthy females had 1 or more CTC in 7.5 ml of blood [21, 22]. These observations are in line with the observations in this study and raise the question why a higher CTC background is observed in patients with benign disease as compared to healthy controls. Still for the identification of patients with cancer the specificity of the CTC test at this low number needs to be improved. Some improvement can be obtained by elimination of the variation between operators in assigning the identified objects as CTC . Although automation of the CTC assignment can eliminate this error, it does not imply that the correct CTC definition is used . Further confirmation will be needed to confirm that the events identified as CTC at this low frequency are indeed tumor cells. Technology to detect genetic abnormalities associated with cancer in CTC detected by the CellSearch system has recently been demonstrated . Even though a background was observed in the control group, the presence of CTC in 30 ml of preoperatively drawn blood of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer was associated with a higher risk of recurrence and breast cancer-related death as compared to patients without CTC. In multivariate logistic regression CTC were significant for death due to breast cancer-related causes, and for distant disease-free survival, but not for overall recurrence-free survival. It has to be said that patients with CTC had higher T- and N-stages than people without CTC and therefore a larger group of CTC-positive patients than CTC-negative patients received adjuvant systemic therapy. This will probably have lowered the number of recurrences and deaths in the CTC-positive group more than in the CTC-negative group. Furthermore, of all 54 patients with recurrence, 13 had a local recurrence. The observation that presence of CTC was only significant for patients with distant recurrences suggests that it is unlikely that systemic CTCs are detected in patients with local recurrences. Our study is slightly underpowered since we needed 500 patients for a power of 80% but, in the end, only included 404 patients with invasive breast cancer. Inclusion was stopped due to cessation of funding in 2009. In this study, disease recurrence was observed in 11.6% of patients in whom no CTC were detected in 30 ml of blood. All patients with recurrent disease must have had tumor cells in the blood at some time to seed the distant metastasis and considerable improvement of the sensitivity and specificity of CTC detection will be needed to detect CTC in all patients at risk for recurrence . In patients in which CTC were detected, 21.1% developed a recurrence during the follow-up period. The median follow-up was 48 months and a longer follow-up may have increased this percentage. This, however, will not obliterate the specificity issue, as it is clear that the specificity of the CTC assay will need to be increased to assure that the detected objects are indeed cancer cells. The specificity of CTC detection was brought to light by the present study through the inclusion of patients with DCIS and benign breast disease in a completely blinded fashion in contrast to other CTC studies using the CellSearch system for the enumeration of CTC in the early disease setting in which no such controls were included [29, 33–35].
Moreover, one would like to discriminate between dormant, viable and tumor cells that have metastatic potential. Larger blood volumes, alternative phenotypes, additional criteria and increase in recovery of CTC are all avenues that can be pursuit to increase the sensitivity of CTC detection.
Presence of CTC in breast cancer patients before undergoing surgery with curative intent is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer-related death and distant disease-free survival, but not for overall recurrence-free survival.
breast cancer-related death
circulating tumor cells
ductal carcinoma in situ
epithelial cell adhesion molecules
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P: Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005, 55: 74-108. 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyages J, Chua B, Taylor R, Bilous M, Salisbury E, Wilcken N, Ung O: Use of the St Gallen classification for patients with node-negative breast cancer may lead to overuse of adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Surg. 2002, 89: 789-796. 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02113.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyages J, Taylor R, Chua B, Ung O, Bilous M, Salisbury E, Wilcken N: A risk index for early node-negative breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2006, 93: 564-571. 10.1002/bjs.5207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Colomer R, Vinas G, Beltran M, Izquierdo A, Lluch A, Llombart-Cussac A, Alba E, Munarriz B, Martin M: Validation of the 2001 St Gallen risk categories for node-negative breast cancer using a database from the Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 961-962. 10.1200/JCO.2004.99.143.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lundin J, Lehtimaki T, Lundin M, Holli K, Elomaa L, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Kataja V, Isola J, Joensuu H: Generalisability of survival estimates for patients with breast cancer - a comparison across two population-based series. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42: 3228-3235. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.06.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olivotto IA, Bajdik CD, Ravdin PM, Speers CH, Coldman AJ, Norris BD, Davis GJ, Chia SK, Gelmon KA: Population-based validation of the prognostic model ADJUVANT! for early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 2716-2725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cronin M, Pho M, Dutta D, Stephans JC, Shak S, Kiefer MC, Esteban JM, Baker JB: Measurement of gene expression in archival paraffin-embedded tissues; development and performance of a 92-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Am J Pathol. 2004, 164: 35-42. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63093-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, Hastie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Thorsen T, Quist H, Matese JC, Brown PO, Botstein D, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale A: Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 10869-10874. 10.1073/pnas.191367098.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- van't Veer LJ, Dai HY, van de Vijver MJ, He YDD, Hart AAM, Mao M, Peterse HL, van der Kooy K, Marton MJ, Witteveen AT, Schreiber GJ Kerkhoven RM, Roberts C, Linsley PS, Bernards R, Friend SH: Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002, 415: 530-536. 10.1038/415530a.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gruvberger S, Ringner M, Chen YD, Panavally S, Saal LH, Borg A, Ferno M, Peterson C, Meltzer PS: Estrogen receptor status in breast cancer is associated with remarkably distinct gene expression patterns. Cancer Research. 2001, 61: 5979-5984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perou CM, Jeffrey SS, Van de Rijn M, Rees CA, Eisen MB, Ross DT, Pergamenschikov A, Williams CF, Zhu SX, Lee JCF, Lashkari D, Shalon D, Brown PO, Botstein D: Distinctive gene expression patterns in human mammary epithelial cells and breast cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 9212-9217. 10.1073/pnas.96.16.9212.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, Pollack JR, Ross DT, Johnsen H, Akslen LA, Fluge O, Pergamenschikov A, Williams C, Zhu SX, Lonning PE, Borresen-Dale AL, Brown PO, Botstein D: Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000, 406: 747-752. 10.1038/35021093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foekens JA, Atkins D, Zhang Y, Sweep F, Harbeck N, Paradiso A, Cufer T, Sieuwerts AM, Talantov D, Span PN, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Zito AF, Specht K, Hoefler H, Golouh R, Schittulli F, Schmitt M, Beex LVAM, Klijn IGM, Wang YX: Multicenter validation of a gene expression-based prognostic signature in lymph node-negative primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24: 1665-1671. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.9115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang YX, Klijn JGM, Zhang Y, Sieuwerts A, Look MP, Yang F, Talantov D, Timmermans M, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Yu J, Jatkoe T, Berns Emjj, Atkins D, Foekens JA: Gene-expression pro-files to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet. 2005, 365: 671-679.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- West M, Blanchette C, Dressman H, Huang E, Ishida S, Spang R, Zuzan H, Olson JA, Marks JR, Nevins JR: Predicting the clinical status of human breast cancer by using gene expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 11462-11467. 10.1073/pnas.201162998.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meng SD, Tripathy D, Frenkel EP, Shete S, Naftalis EZ, Huth JF, Beitsch PD, Leitch M, Hoover S, Euhus D, Haley B, Morrison L, Herlyn D, Terstappen LWMM, Fehm T, Tucker TF, Lane N, Wang JQ, Uhr JW: Circulating tumor cells in patients with breast cancer dormancy. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 8152-8162. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vessella R, Pantel K, Mohla S: Tumor cell dormancy: an NCI workshop report. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007, 6: 1496-1504. 10.4161/cbt.6.9.4828.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braun S, Pantel K, Muller P, Janni W, Hepp F, Kentenich CRM, Gastroph S, Wischnik A, Dimpfl T, Kindermann G, Riethmuller G, Schlimok G: Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 525-533. 10.1056/NEJM200002243420801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braun S, Vogl FD, Naume B, Janni W, Osborne MP, Coombes RC, Schlimok G, Diel IJ, Gerber B, Gebauer G, Pierga JY, Marth C, Oruzio D, Wiedswang G, Solomayer EF, Kundt G, Strobl B, Fehm T, Wong GYC, Bliss J, Vincent-Salomon A, Pantel K: A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 793-802. 10.1056/NEJMoa050434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fehm T, Braun S, Muller V, Janni W, Gebauer G, Marth C, Schindlbeck C, Wallwiener D, Borgen E, Naume B, Pantel K, Solomayer E: A concept for the standardized detection of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow from patients with primary breast cancer and its clinical implementation. Cancer. 2006, 107: 885-892. 10.1002/cncr.22076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Allard WJ, Matera J, Miller MC, Repollet M, Connelly MC, Rao C, Tibbe AGJ, Uhr JW, Terstappen L: Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. 2004, 10: 6897-6904. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LW, Hayes DF: Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351: 781-791. 10.1056/NEJMoa040766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LW, Hayes DF: Circulating tumor cells: a novel prognostic factor for newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 1420-1430. 10.1200/JCO.2005.08.140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayes DF, Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Miller MC, Matera J, Allard WJ, Doyle GV, Terstappen L: Circulating tumor cells at each follow-up time point during therapy of metastatic breast cancer patients predict progression-free and overall survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 4218-4224. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Budd GT, Cristofanilli M, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Borden E, Miller MC, Matera J, Repollet M, Doyle GV, Terstappen LWMM, Hayes D: Circulating tumor cells versus imaging-predicting overall survival in metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 6403-6409. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1769.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dawood S, Broglio K, Valero V, Reuben J, Handy B, Islam R, Jackson S, Hortobagyi GN, Fritsche H, Cristofanilli M: Circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer from prognostic stratification to modification of the staging system?. Cancer. 2008, 113: 2422-2430. 10.1002/cncr.23852.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Giorgi U, Valero V, Rohren E, Dawood S, Ueno NT, Miller MC, Doyle GV, Jackson S, Andreopoulou E, Handy BC, Reuben JM, Fritsche HA, Macapinlac HA, Hortobagyi GN, Cristofanilli M: Circulating tumor cells and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for outcome prediction in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 3303-3311. 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu MC, Shields PG, Warren RD, Cohen P, Wilkinson M, Ottaviano YL, Rao SB, Eng-Wong J, Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F, Noone AM, Isaacs C: Circulating tumor cells: a useful predictor of treatment efficacy in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009, 27: 5153-5159. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6664.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pierga JY, Hajage D, Bachelot T, Delaloge S, Brain E, Campone M, Dieras V, Rolland E, Mignot L, Mathiot C, Bidard FC: High independent prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cells compared with serum tumor markers in a large prospective trial in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2012, 23: 618-24. 10.1093/annonc/mdr263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pierga JY, Bidard FC, Mathiot C, Brain E, Delaloge S, Giachetti S, de Cremoux P, Salmon R, Vincent-Salomon A, Marty M: Circulating tumor cell detection predicts early metastatic relapse after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in large operable and locally advanced breast cancer in a phase II randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14: 7004-7010. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National guidelines breast cancer (richlijn mamacarcinoom 2008). [http://www.cbo.nl]
- Adjuvant! Online Decision making tools for health care professionals. [http://www.adjuvantonline.com]
- Lucci A, Hall CS, Lodhi AK, Bhattacharyya A, Anderson AE, Xiao LC, Bedrosian I, Kuerer HM, Krishnamurthy S: Circulating tumour cells in non-metastatic breast cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncology. 2012, 13: 688-695. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70209-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jueckstock JK, Rack BK, Zwingers T, Hepp PGM, Schneeweiss A, Beckmann MW, Lichtenegger W, Sommer HL, Pantel K, Tesch H, Forstbauer H, Lorenz R, Rezai M, Neugebauer JK, Andergassen U, Friese K, Janni W: Prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells (CTC) before adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: results of the German SUCCESS trial. ASCO Meeting Abstracts. 2011, 29: 1033-Google Scholar
- Rack B SC, Andergassen U, Lorenz R, Zwingers T, Schneeweiss A, Lichtenegger W, Beckmann MW, Sommer H, Pantel K, Friese K, Janni W: Prognostic relevance of circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of primary breast cancer patients. SABC. 2010, S6-5.Google Scholar
- Tibbe AGJ, Miller MC, Terstappen LWMM: Statistical considerations for enumeration of circulating tumor cells. Cytometry Part A. 2007, 154-162. 71A
- Coumans FAW LS, Uhr J, Terstappen LWMM: Challenges in the enumeration and phenotyping of CTC. Clin Cancer Res. 2012, 18: 5711-5718. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1585.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ligthart ST, Coumans FAW, Attard G, Mulick Cassidy A, de Bono JS, Terstappen LWMM: Unbiased and automated identification of a circulating tumour cell definition that associates with overall survival. Plos One. 2011, 6: e27419-10.1371/journal.pone.0027419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Swennenhuis JF, Tibbe AGJ, Levink R, Sipkema RCJ, Terstappen LWMM: Characterization of circulating tumor cells by Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization. Cytometry Part A. 2009, 520-527. 75A
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.