Breast imaging technology: Probing physiology and molecular function using optical imaging - applications to breast cancer
© BioMed Central Ltd on behalf of the copyright holders 2000
Published: 1 December 2000
The present review addresses the capacity of optical imaging to resolve functional and molecular characteristics of breast cancer. We focus on recent developments in optical imaging that allow three-dimensional reconstruction of optical signatures in the human breast using diffuse optical tomography (DOT). These technologic advances allow the noninvasive, in vivo imaging and quantification of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin and of contrast agents that target the physiologic and molecular functions of tumors. Hence, malignancy differentiation can be based on a novel set of functional features that are complementary to current radiologic imaging methods. These features could enhance diagnostic accuracy, lower the current state-of-the-art detection limits, and play a vital role in therapeutic strategy and monitoring.
Keywordscontrast agents diffuse optical tomography spectral imaging
Tissue visualization with light is probably the most common imaging practice in medicine and medical research. Historically, visual inspection of a patient or observation of tissues using optical microscopes has been widely used to assess structure and function. Those two examples use the human retina as the recording medium. Generally, medical optical imaging encompasses a large set of imaging technologies that use light from the ultraviolet to the infrared region to image tissue optical characteristics. Light offers wavelength-dependent interactions with tissue that yield unique contrast mechanisms for imaging; scattering, absorption, and fluorescence of intrinsic and extrinsic tissue elements reveal information on structure, physiology, biochemistry, and molecular function.
Because of the important information that light reveals, optical imaging has found many applications for in vivo tissue measurements. Optical imaging has been used to probe surface structures, such as the functional activation of the exposed brain regions , skin cancers [2,3], and those revealed by endoscopic procedures [3,4], but it has also been used to investigate noninvasively the internal function of large organs such as the breast [5,6,7] and the unexposed brain [8,9]. There are, however, fundamental differences between optical imaging of surface structures and of large organs. Optical imaging, a high-resolution technique for surface imaging, becomes an imaging method with millimeter-scale resolution when probing large organs. This is because tissue scatters light significantly. Hence, photons that propagate inside tissue do not follow straight paths as do X-ray photons, but rather they diffuse and follow random paths [10**]. This process impairs resolution. Tissue absorption may also be a complication in imaging large tissues, depending on the wavelength used and the target organ. For this reason the near infrared (NIR) part of the spectrum is typically selected for imaging large organs because tissue exhibits low absorption in the NIR and allows light of safe power to penetrate to depths of several centimeters.
Optical imaging may have a major role in breast cancer research and detection, despite its low resolution, by assessing functional and molecular cancer characteristics. Intrinsically, the main light absorbers of the breast in the NIR window are oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. Hence, the optical technique is a unique noninvasive technology for imaging and quantifying vascularization, and especially oxygen saturation of breast tumors. These features are associated with angiogenesis and hypoxia, which are two correlates of breast malignancy. Furthermore, there is an intensified effort to produce extrinsic absorbing and fluorescent probes, especially for the NIR region, that target physiologic and genetic responses [11,12,13]. These probes could increase cancer contrast and target specific gene expression that could eventually improve early detection limits and specificity, but also help in the design of optimum treatments and in assessing treatment efficacy.
The unique features of the optical method, along with its high sensitivity for detecting photons and use of nonionizing radiation, renders optical imaging a technology that could complement existing breast imaging techniques for cancer detection and characterization. The compatibility of the technology with most other radiologic imaging techniques allows the creation of combined modalities for simultaneous breast examinations that yield a superior feature set. Furthermore, optical methods are economic and can acquire data continuously; hence, they may be used for real-time monitoring.
In the following commentary, a brief historical perspective on breast cancer optical imaging is presented and current advances in this field are discussed. Specific focus is given to the infant clinical steps of DOT, a method that uses light and that can image and quantify tissue optical properties (and thus function) in three dimensions. The combination of the technique with novel vascular and molecular contrast agents is also discussed, and the possibility of coupling the optical method with other medical modalities for improving the information content of the composite examination is outlined.
Breast cancer detection using optical imaging is not a novel idea; it dates back to 1929 when Cutler  shined light through the pendant breast to observe the absorption pattern on the other side. This method was termed 'transillumination' or 'diaphanography'. Although cancerous lesions with increased vascularization were detected, certain other benign formations with increased hemoglobin content also yielded absorption contrast. Because no absorption quantification or high-resolution architectural information was available, the method did not offer sufficient specificity for clinical utility. Technologic breakthroughs during the late 1970s and in the 1980s, specifically the use of video cameras in the visible or NIR parts of the spectrum, revived interest in transillumination. However, the basic limitations that Cutler encountered, regarding differentiating between malignant and benign lesions, were not significantly improved by the use of better recording media. Furthermore, reports on the sensitivity of the method varied significantly. Sensitivity values as high as 96% have been reported [15,16], but several studies [5,17,18] found transillumination to yield sensitivity around 60% and to be significantly inferior to X-ray mammography.
Sensitivity and specificity measures using these advanced transillumination approaches have not yet appeared in the literature. Probably the most promising characteristics of these approaches, however, are the following: the use of multiple distinct wavelengths that could enhance sensitivity and specificity on the basis of spectral signatures; and the use of a set of assumptions combined with theoretic models that could provide a quantified estimation of the geometric and optical parameters of the lesion measured [19,21].
Diffuse optical tomography
A breakthrough in optical imaging that was made during the past decade is the development of DOT, a technique that employs diffuse light that propagates through tissue, at multiple projections, to yield three-dimensional quantified tomographic images of the internal optical properties of organs. The technique employs technologic and mathematical advances and, depending on the technology employed, can yield quantified, three-dimensional maps of absorption, scattering, vascularization, oxygenation, and contrast agent uptake in either fluorescence or absorption mode.
In comparison with transillumination, the technique offers superior quantification accuracy, independent determination of absorption, scattering and fluorescence lifetime and yield, three-dimensional imaging capability, and lesion size determination because of the multiple-projection information content and inclusive theoretic approaches it uses. Generally, DOT uses a theoretic model (typically a numeric or analytic solution of the diffusion equation [22**]) to describe the propagation of photons into diffuse media and to predict the measurements of the experimental arrangement (forward problem). Then, inversion methods, which are based on this forward model, reconstruct the optical properties of the breast under investigation by operating on a set of light measurements that are taken through this tissue. If the method employs measurements at multiple distinct wavelengths, spectral information can also be obtained.
Although constant intensity light can be used for DOT, especially when only changes in tissue absorption or fluorescence are to be imaged, there are certain advantages with the use of short photon pulses (in the picosecond range or less) or light of modulated intensity. DOT employs the information gained by advanced photon technology in a more comprehensive and meaningful way than does transillumination. Photon pulses or light of modulated intensity direct photon waves into diffuse media (called diffuse photon density waves or [DPDWs] ). The use of DPDWs in the megahertz range can separate, and independently image and quantify the distribution of tissue absorption and scattering properties . In fluorescence mode, the use of DPDW can be used to image fluorophore concentration and lifetime in three dimensions. The use of photon pulses is equivalent (via Fourier transformation) to measurements with light that is modulated at multiple frequencies (practically up to 1 GHz). The use of multiple frequencies can be simultaneously combined in one reconstruction scheme to increase the information content and the accuracy of the inversion .
Optical imaging of intrinsic and extrinsic breast cancer activity
Imaging of intrinsic contrast
The capacity of optical imaging, and especially DOT, to image and quantify intrinsic and extrinsic tissue optical properties is discussed above. Intrinsic optical contrast offers significant functional information. Imaging of scattering may be associated with structural characteristics and the concentrations of organelles. More importantly, imaging of the absorption coefficient at appropriately selected wavelengths can quantify the concentrations of water and oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin of breast tumors, and obtain measures of hemoglobin concentration and hypoxia. Therefore, the optical method is unique in assessing and quantifying those important functional tissue and cancer characteristics. Correlation of intrinsic signals and malignancy has been demonstrated [28**]. The detection limits and the diagnostic capacity of any combination of the intrinsic features on a screening population remain to be seen, because the limited number of patients examined by DOT thus far does not allow such factors to be identified.
Imaging of contrast agents
Similar to other clinical imaging modalities, a novel element that can enhance the potential applications of optical imaging is the use of contrast agents. In the NIR range the most widely used contrast agent is ICG, because it is a safe, US Food and Drug Administration-approved NIR absorbing and fluorescing dye. ICG is an intravascular contrast agent that may extravasate through vessels of high permeability, such as cancerous vessels. Therefore, ICG imaging of the breast mainly probes permeability and vascularization . Other ICG derivatives with extravascular distribution mechanisms have recently been considered  for diagnostic purposes. Several other imaging methods can target such features with the use of appropriate contrast agents. Similar to nuclear imaging, however, the optical method generally can detect very small concentrations of chromophores or fluorophores, but without using ionizing radiation and at a reduced cost. Therefore, optical methods may still have significant advantages in breast cancer detection using such extrinsic contrast agents.
Imaging molecular activity and gene expression
A new advance that holds great promise for breast cancer research is the recent development of optical probes for molecular imaging, specifically in the NIR range. Fluorescent dyes that target specific tumor receptors , or that are activated (fluoresce) by tumor-associated enzymes (such as cathepsins and matrix metalloproteinases) , have been shown to identify their molecular targets in vivo. The latter probes probably hold the greatest promise, because they are quenched in the absence of the targeted enzymatic activity, yielding highly specific fluorescence signals.
Using this technology, appropriately engineered fluorescent probes can be selectively activated by endogenous or transferred gene expression. The combination of such probes with optical imaging may yield a unique, highly sensitive technology for in vivo and real-time imaging of the expression patterns for various enzymes, which are crucially involved in tumor formation and metastasis. Various breast cancer cell lines have been identified to over-express specific enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases , which are not over-expressed in normal cells.
Therefore, the impact of developing molecular-optical imaging, and in particular molecular-DOT, of the breast is potentially enormous. First, selected molecular activity can be achieved with high sensitivity, because background fluorescence is quenched. Second, cancers could be detected at their molecular onset, before anatomic changes become apparent. Therefore, therapies can be initiated at a very early stage, which is the single most important strategy in achieving high survival rates. Third, specific cancer parameters such as growth kinetics, angiogenesis growth factors, tumor cell markers, and genetic alterations could be studied without perturbing the tumor environment. Finally, this additional information could aid in the development of novel targeted drugs and therapies, and could allow assessment of their efficacy at the molecular level. The importance of this imaging strategy is further amplified by considering that photon technology can detect single photons, so that it can resolve fluorescent molecules at nanomolar to picomolar concentrations, and requires instrumentation that is of relatively low cost and that uses nonionizing radiation.
Another exciting application of optical technology is the combination of optical imagers with other imaging modalities. Light guidance using optical fibers makes optical imaging compatible with many other radiologic methods , such as mammography, ultrasound, MRI, and positron emission tomography, among others. The development of hybrid modalities offers the potential of simultaneously scanning the breast, under identical physiologic and geometric conditions. The optical method offers several complementary features to those of established medical imaging methods, mainly through targeting oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin, but also through the study of molecular events and gene expression, as discussed above. This can produce an increased number of features that may augment the diagnostic value of any single technique alone. Additionally, high-resolution information taken from another imaging modality can be implemented into the DOT inversion scheme to improve the quantification accuracy of the optical method.
Imaging of function and molecular activity is at the frontier of current research efforts to detect and study cancer non-invasively. Optical imaging offers complementary features to those of established radiologic imaging techniques, primarily the quantitative imaging of hemoglobin saturation and concentration, and the selective imaging of specific gene expression with high sensitivity, because background signals can be suppressed using enzyme-activated fluorescence probes. Similarly to other technologies, the method can also characterize vascularization, permeability, and a plethora of contrast agents with high sensitivity, without using harmful radiation and probably at lesser cost.
Current trends in optical imaging focus on the construction imagers that yield an increased data-set of optical measurements per examination, so that higher resolution and quantification accuracy is achieved. The use of multiple wavelengths in order to capitalize on spectral information and to allow the quantification of other tissue chromophores apart from oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin is also being pursued. More accurate and more efficient forward and inversion problems for improving the quantification accuracy and reconstruction speed are also being investigated. Finally, the abilities of various contrast agents and probes to assess different functional and molecular cancer characteristics are being explored. We believe that optical imaging will play a vital role in our further understanding of carcinogenesis, in early detection of cancer, and in the design of effective treatments.
We are grateful to Brian Pogue, Sergio Fantini, and Ralph Weissleder for providing exciting results, and to Christoph Bremer and Christina Benou for useful discussions.
- Cannestra AF, Bookheimer SY, Pouratian N, O'Farrell A, Sicotte N, Martin NA, Becker D, Rubino G, Toga AW: Temporal and topographical characterization of language cortices using intraoperative optical intrinsic signals. Neuroimage. 2000, 12: 41-54. 10.1006/nimg.2000.0597.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang P, Farkas DL, Kirkwood JM, Abernethy JL, Edington HD, Becker D: Macroscopic spectral imaging and gene expression analysis of the early stages of melanoma. Mol Med. 1999, 5: 785-794.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Svanberg K, Wang I, Colleen S, Idvall I, Ingvar C, Rydell R, Jocham D, Diddens H, Bown S, Gregory G, Montan S, Andersson-Engels S, Svanberg S: Clinical multi-colour fluorescence imaging of malignant tumours: initial experience. Acta Radiol. 1998, 39: 2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stepp H, Sroka R, Baumgartner R: Fluorescence endoscopy of gastrointestinal diseases: basic principles, techniques, and clinical experience. Endoscopy. 1998, 30: 379-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sickles EA: Breast cancer detection with transillumination and mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 1984, 142: 841-844.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Franceschini MA, Moesta KT, Fantini S, Gaida G, Gratton E, Jess H, Mantulin WW, Seeber M, Schlag PM, Kaschke M: Frequency-domain techniques enhance optical mammography: initial clinical results. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 6468-6473. 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6468.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ntziachristos V, Yodh AG, Schnall M, Chance B: Concurrent MRI and diffuse optical tomography of breast after indocyanine green enhancement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 2767-2772. 10.1073/pnas.040570597.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Benaron DA, Hintz SR, Villringer A, Boas D, Kleinschmidt A, Frahm J, Hirth C, Obrig H, van Houten JC, Kermit EL, Cheong WF, Stevenson DK: Noninvasive functional imaging of human brain using light. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 20: 469-477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Villringer A, Chance B: Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function. Trends Neurosci. 1997, 20: 435-442. 10.1016/S0166-2236(97)01132-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yodh AG, Chance B: Spectroscopy and imaging with diffusing light. Physics Today. 1995, 48: 34-40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Licha K, Riefke B, Ntziachristos V, Becker A, Chance B, Semmler W: Hydrophilic cyanine dye as contrast agents for near-infrared tumor imaging: synthesis, photophysical properties and spectroscopic in vivo characterization. Photochem Photobiol. 2000, 72: 392-398. 10.1562/0031-8655(2000)072<0392:HCDACA>2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Achilefu S, Dorshow RB, Bugaj JE, Rajagopalan R: Novel receptor-targeted fluorescent contrast agents for in vivo tumor imaging. Invest Radiol. 2000, 35: 479-485. 10.1097/00004424-200008000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weissleder R, Tung CH, Mahmood U, Bogdanov A: In vivo imaging of tumors with protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent probes. Nature Biotechnol. 1999, 17: 375-378. 10.1038/7933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cutler M: Transillumination as an aid in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1929, 48: 721-729.Google Scholar
- Bundred N, Levack P, Watmough DJ, Watmough JA: Preliminary results using computerized telediaphanography for investigating breast disease. Br J Hosp Med. 1987, 37: 70-71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lafreniere R, Ashkar FS, Ketcham AS: Infrared light scanning of the breast. Am Surg. 1986, 52: 123-128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brenner RJ: X-ray mammography and diaphanography in screening for breast cancer. J Reprod Med. 1982, 27: 679-684.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drexler B, Davis JL, Schofield G: Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiology. 1985, 157: 41-44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grosenick D, Wabnitz H, Rinneberg HH, Moesta KT, Schlag PM: Development of a time domain optical mammograph and first in vivo applications. Appl Opt. 1999, 38: 2927-2943.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fantini S, Heffer EL, Franceschini MA, Götz L, Heinig A, Heywang-Köbrunner S, Schütz O, Siebold H: Optical mammography with intensity-modulated light. In: Proceedings Volume from In Vivo Optical Imaging Workshop; September 16-17 1999. Edited by Gandjbakhche A. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health;. 2000,Google Scholar
- Fantini S, Walker SA, Franceschini MA, Kaschke M, Schlag PM, Moesta KT: Assessment of the size, position, and optical properties of breast tumors in vivo by noninvasive optical methods. Appl Opt. 1998, 37: 1982-1989.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arridge SR: Optical tomography in medical imaging. Inverse Problems. 1999, 15: R41-R93. 10.1088/0266-5611/15/2/022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O'Leary MA, Boas DA, Chance B, Yodh AG: Experimental images of heterogeneous turbid media by frequency-domain diffusing-photon tomography. Opt Lett. 1995, 20: 426-428.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ntziachristos V, Ma XH, Chance B: Time-correlated single photon counting imager for simultaneous magnetic resonance and near-infrared mammography. Rev Sci Instrum. 1998, 69: 4221-4233. 10.1063/1.1149235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pogue BW, Testorf M, McBride T, Osterberg U, Paulsen K: Instrumentation and design of a frequency-domain diffuse optical tomography imager for breast cancer detection. Opt Express. 1997, 1: 391-403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoogenraad JH, van der Mark MB, Colak SB, 't Hooft GW, van der Linden ES: First results from the Philips optical mammoscope. In: Photon Propagation of tissues III. Edited by Benaron DA, Chance B, Ferrari M. SPIE: The International Society for Optical Engineering;. 1997, 3194: 184-190.Google Scholar
- Pogue BW, McBride TO, Osterman S, Poplack S, Osterberg U, Paulsen KD: Quantitative hemoglobin tomography with diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: pilot results in the breast. Radiology. 2000, 218:Google Scholar
- Tromberg BJ, Shah N, Lanning R, Cerussi A, Espinoza J, Pham T, Svaasand L, Butler J: Non-invasive in vivo characterization of breast tumors using photon migration spectroscopy. Neoplasia. 2000, 2: 26-40. 10.1038/sj.neo.7900082.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Giambernardi TA, Grant GM, Taylor GP, Hay RJ, Maher VM, McCormick JJ, Klebe RJ: Overview of matrix metalloproteinase expression in cultured human cells. Matrix Biol. 1998, 16: 483-496. 10.1016/S0945-053X(98)90019-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar