Induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in PMC42-LA human breast carcinoma cells by carcinoma-associated fibroblast secreted factors
© Lebret et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 26 September 2006
Accepted: 20 February 2007
Published: 20 February 2007
Breast carcinoma is accompanied by changes in the acellular and cellular components of the microenvironment, the latter typified by a switch from fibroblasts to myofibroblasts.
We utilised conditioned media cultures, Western blot analysis and immunocytochemistry to investigate the differential effects of normal mammary fibroblasts (NMFs) and mammary cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) on the phenotype and behaviour of PMC42-LA breast cancer cells. NMFs were obtained from a mammary gland at reduction mammoplasty, and CAFs from a mammary carcinoma after resection.
We found greater expression of myofibroblastic markers in CAFs than in NMFs. Medium from both CAFs and NMFs induced novel expression of α-smooth muscle actin and cytokeratin-14 in PMC42-LA organoids. However, although conditioned media from NMFs resulted in distribution of vimentin-positive cells to the periphery of PMC42-LA organoids, this was not seen with CAF-conditioned medium. Upregulation of vimentin was accompanied by a mis-localization of E-cadherin, suggesting a loss of adhesive function. This was confirmed by visualizing the change in active β-catenin, localized to the cell junctions in control cells/cells in NMF-conditioned medium, to inactive β-catenin, localized to nuclei and cytoplasm in cells in CAF-conditioned medium.
We found no significant difference between the influences of NMFs and CAFs on PMC42-LA cell proliferation, viability, or apoptosis; significantly, we demonstrated a role for CAFs, but not for NMFs, in increasing the migratory ability of PMC42-LA cells. By concentrating NMF-conditioned media, we demonstrated the presence of factor(s) that induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in NMF-conditioned media that are present at higher levels in CAF-conditioned media. Our in vitro results are consistent with observations in vivo showing that alterations in stroma influence the phenotype and behaviour of surrounding cells and provide evidence for a role for CAFs in stimulating cancer progression via an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. These findings have implications for our understanding of the roles of signalling between epithelial and stromal cells in the development and progression of mammary carcinoma.
In the mammary gland, the extracellular matrix (ECM) influences cell growth, migration, morphology, proliferation, differentiation and biosynthetic activities . Stromal-epithelial interactions in the mammary gland also play an important role in cancer development. This so-called reactive stroma differs from the stroma of the normal mammary gland, exhibiting changes similar to those seen with wound healing, such as fibroblast proliferation and extracellular matrix remodelling, although in an uncontrolled manner . The stromal-epithelial interactions between fibroblasts and the luminal and myoepithelial cells of the mammary gland are important for normal development , and it has been postulated that cancer may be a physiological response to abnormal extracellular environment, and that disruptions in stroma-epithelium reactions may accelerate carcinogenesis [4–8]. Conversely, normal stroma can efficiently inhibit the expression of characteristics of neoplasm . Most notably, it has previously been demonstrated that irradiation of the cleared mammary fat pad of mice causes malignant progression of transplanted normal mammary cells .
Fibroblasts produce stromal ECM proteins  and secrete many growth factors and hormones, including hepatocyte growth factor, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-II, epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, fibroblast gowth factor (FGF)-7, FGF-2, FGF-10 and interleukin-6 . Fibroblasts are also involved tumourigenesis, through the synthesis, deposition and remodelling of the ECM that occurs in mammary carcinoma, and are also the main source of paracrine factors that influence the growth of carcinoma cells . In vitro culture and in vivo tissue recombination systems demonstrate that factors derived from tumour fibroblasts stimulate tumour progression of nontumourigenic epithelial cells [11, 12].
Breast carcinoma is accompanied by changes in both the acellular and cellular components of the microenvironment, the latter typified by a switch from normal mammary fibroblasts (NMFs) to myofibroblasts during cancer progression. Myofibroblasts, also known as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), have smooth muscle phenotypic properties , typified by the expression of α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) in vivo and in vitro.  In primary cultures from normal human breast tissue, there are few or no α-SMA-positive stromal cells, although high frequencies have been observed in primary cultures from breast carcinomas. CAFs also express fibroblast activation protein (FAP), a 93 kDa cell surface protein of reactive-tumour stromal cells that is not present in most normal human adult tissue.
CAFs were first identified over 30 years ago in healing rat wounds , and may influence the propensity of luminal epithelial cells to undergo an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and hence become malignant . CAFs differ from NMFs also in their increased expression of growth factors [16, 17], and different profiles of ECM molecule synthesis [18–20] and ECM-altering proteases and protease inhibitors [21, 22]. The role played by fibroblasts in the development or progression of cancer is not yet fully understood, and the use of physiologically relevant co-culture models using fibroblasts from normal and cancer stroma may provide a tool for the analysis of the effect of fibroblasts.
PMC42-LA is a heterogeneous human breast cancer cell line with stem cell-like properties [23, 24]. When cultured within a reconstituted extracellular matrix (Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm sarcoma [EHS] matrix) PMC42-LA cells form hollow, alveolar-like structures, or organoids, that express β-casein in the presence of lactogenic hormones . In the presence of EGF, PMC42-LA cells in two-dimensional culture undergo an EMT [25, 26]. Depending on the tissue culture environment, PMC42-LA can exhibit luminal epithelial or myoepithelial markers . These inducible features of PMC42-LA, in addition to the many breast-like characteristics originally described [23, 24, 26, 28], make PMC42-LA an attractive cell culture model for investigation of the differential effects NMFs and CAFs.
We previously showed that fibroblasts induce a myoepithelial switch in PMC42-LA cells, with primary mammary fibroblasts being more effective than immortalized skin fibroblasts . In the present study we investigated the differential effects of CAFs compared with NMFs on the phenotype and behaviour of PMC42-LA cells and organoids. Our results provide direct evidence for a role for CAFs in contributing to cellular disorganization and loss of cell-cell adhesion, and demonstrate that CAFs, as compared with NMFs, significantly increase the migratory/invasive ability of PMC42-LA cells.
Materials and methods
PMC42-LA cells were grown at 37°C in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% (vol/vol) foetal bovine serum (FBS; Thermo Trace, Melbourne, Australia). Primary human NMFs were isolated from human breast tissue with appropriate consent from women undergoing reduction mammoplasty, in accordance with the standards of St. Vincent's Hospital Human Ethics Committee. Primary mammary CAFs were obtained from minced tumour tissue of a mammary tumour biopsy. Tissue was minced and digested with 200 ml collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 100 ml hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)/Ham's F-12 (1:1) with 10% (vol/vol) FBS containing penicillin, streptomycin and amphoporicin B (Thermo Electron Corporation, Melbourne, Australia) overnight at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide with gentle rocking. Digested tissue was centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min, and the cell pellet was resuspended in medium and filtered through a 40 μm cell strainer. The cells were allowed to attach overnight, cultured in growth medium as above, and used within 10 passages. SV40 immortalized human skin fibroblasts (GM847), obtained for diagnostic purposes, were grown and maintained in basal medium (Eagle's) with 10% (vol/vol) FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) for use as a control. Cells were passaged in 0.05% trypsin/EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich) when confluent; primary cells were passaged a maximum of 11 passages.
To induce organoid formation of PMC42-LA cells, 150 μl undiluted EHS (Sigma-Aldrich) was spread with a cell scraper on chilled PET track-etched/porous membrane cell culture inserts (0.4 μm pore size; Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The filters were incubated at 37°C for 30–45 min to allow the EHS to set. Once set, 150 μl diluted (4% vol/vol in chilled distilled water) EHS was placed on the surface of the set EHS, followed by 2 ml of RPMI 10% FBS (ThermoTrace) containing 106 PMC42-LA cells. Then, 3 ml RPMI 10% FBS was placed beneath the filter using a pipette. Cells were incubated for 5 days at 37°C with 5% carbon dioxide before processing. For EHS matrix with fibroblasts beneath the filter, the same procedure was followed except that 0.5 × 105 previously trypsinised fibroblasts (NMFs or CAFs) were placed in the well beneath the filter insert with 1 ml DMEM/Ham's F-12 (10% FBS; Thermo Electron Corporation) and 2 ml RPMI (Thermo Trace).
For conditioned medium experiments, attached confluent fibroblasts were rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fresh DMEM:Ham's F-12 (10% FBS) media added to flasks. Flasks were returned to 37°C with 5% carbon dioxide, and after 48 hours the conditioned medium was collected, double filter sterilized using an eccentric tip syringe (Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) and sterile nonpyrogenic 0.2 μm filter (Schleicher & Schuell BioScience, Keene, NH, USA), and used at a 1:1 ratio in addition to fresh RPMI on top or beneath the filter.
Either 10 ml (1×), 5 ml (2×), 2.5 ml (4×), or 1 ml (10×) fresh DMEM:Ham's F-12 (10% FBS) was added to confluent NMFs. After 24 hours, medium was collected and used to culture PMC42-LA cells on glass cover slips before scratch wound assays.
Cell counting was conducted using a standard haemocytometer, and cell viability tests were conducted using dye exclusion with trypan blue solution (0.4%; Sigma-Aldrich).
Nitric acid-treated glass cover slips were used to culture PMC42-LA cells in six-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) for scratch tests. Using a sterilized plastic cafeteria fork, a series of scratches were made on confluent cover slips and these were processed for indirect immunocytochemistry as described below. For each cover slip, four scratches were made, averaging between 367 μm (minimum) and 392 μm (maximum) width, at time 0. Each scratch was measured at several time points and averaged, and the extent of wound closure was measured microscopically, compared with the original width of scratches and averaged. Data were processed and standard deviation calculated using Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).
Mouse anti-human β-actin, anti-human catenin-β and goat anti-human vimentin antibodies were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Mouse anti-human vimentin and mouse anti-human E-cadherin antibodies were purchased from Zymed laboratories, Inc. (San Francisco, CA, USA) and mouse anti-human α-SMA antibodies were purchased from Dako (Denmark, Europe). Goat anti-human E-cadherin and rabbit anti-active caspase-3 antibodies were purchased from Chemicon International Inc. (Temecula, CA, USA) and rabbit anti-human α-SMA antibodies from Abcam plc. (Cambridge, UK); anti-human FAP antibodies (muF19) from the biological production facility at Austin Hospital were kindly donated by the Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research (Heidelberg, Australia). The Alexa Fluor secondary antibodies used for immunocytochemistry were purchased from Molecular Probes Inc. (Eurgene, OR, USA) and included goat anti-mouse IgG labelled with Alexa 488, donkey anti-sheep IgG labeled with Alexa 594 and donkey anti-rabbit IgG labelled with Alexa 594. Anti-mouse horse-radish peroxidase conjugated antibody from Sigma-Aldrich was used as a secondary antibody in Western blot analysis.
Protein extraction and quantification
Confluent PMC42-LA cells cultured in flasks were treated with 0.05% (vol/vol) trypsin/EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich), cell suspensions were centrifuged and the pellet re-suspended in 5 ml PBS. Following two washes in PBS and re-centrifugation, the pellets were stored at -80°C until needed, or prepared for quantification as described.
PMC42-LA cells cultured in EHS to form organoids were washed twice in PBS, following which 2 ml of 5 mg/ml dispase (Sigma-Aldrich; 20 mg/ml stock concentration) in RPMI/10% FBS was added to the filters. The filters were incubated for 30 to 90 min, or until cells were detached. Cells were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min, washed twice with PBS, and the pellet was dried and then stored at -80°C.
Cell pellets were re-suspended in 500 μl of 1% (weight/vol) SDS in 10 mmol/l Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) on ice and homogenized by passaging through a 21-guage needle 15 times on ice, after which cells were sonicated (40% power output, 30% duty cycle) twice using a Microson Ultrasonic cell disrupter (Misonix Incorporated, Farmingdale, NY, USA). Samples were centrifuged and the supernatant quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Reagent Kit (Perbio, Rockford, IL, USA), in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The protein concentrations were determined by measuring the absorbance at 595 nm.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis
Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane at 10 V for 40 min. The membranes were blocked in 1% (weight/vol) casein/Tris-buffered saline (TBS) overnight at 4°C in a sealed bag. Following this, the membrane was exposed to the appropriate antibody diluted in 1% casein/TBS at varying concentrations overnight at 4°C, and then washed three times for 10 min each in 1% (weight/vol) casein/TBS. The membrane was then exposed to anti-mouse horse radish peroxidase conjugated antibody, diluted at 1:2,000 in 1% (weight/vol) casein/TBS, for 2 hours at room temperature. The membrane was then washed twice in 1% (weight/vol) casein/TBS for 10 min and, finally, in TBS Tween 20 solution twice for 15 min each. A Roche BM chemiluminescence Blotting substrate POD kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was used, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, and placed on membranes for 2 min, after which the membranes were placed inside a LAS-3000 Fuji Film intelligent dark box. The illuminated bands were detected and the image captured using Image reader LAS-3000 software. For each result given, Western blot analysis was performed on three separate occasions with new cell lysates.
To re-probe membranes and analyze protein loading, membranes were stripped with a re-blot solution (Re-blot plus strong; Chemicon International Inc.) at a 1:10 dilution, in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. The membrane was then blocked with 1% (weight/vol) casein/TBS for 1 hour at room temperature and re-probed with anti-β-actin (1:5,000 in 1% casein/TBS) as a control for protein loading and processed, as described above, as a control for protein loading.
To determine the density of the bands present in Western blots, a Multi-Gauge V2.3 program (FUJIFILM Medical Systems Inc., Stamford, Connecticut, USA) was used to read band densities. Data were processed, standard deviations calculated, and t-tests performed using Microsoft Excel software.
Indirect immunocytochemistry of cultured cells
Once confluent, cells cultured on glass cover slips were washed three times with PBS, fixed in 4% (weight/vol) paraformaldehyde (PFA/PBS; Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min at room temperature, and washed again three times in PBS. To permeabilize the cells, 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100/PBS (Amresco Inc., Solon, OH, USA) was applied to cells for 10 min at room temperature, after which the cells were washed three times in PBS and incubated with 1% (weight/vol) bovine serum albumin in PBS (BSA/PBS; Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 hours at room temperature to reduce nonspecific binding of primary antibodies. Following this, 30 μl of the appropriate primary antibody, diluted in 1% (weight/vol) bovine serum albumin/PBS was placed on each cover slip, and the cover slips incubated overnight at 4°C. Cover slips were then washed three times at 15 min each with PBS and were incubated with 30 μl of the secondary antibody (Alexa goat anti-mouse IgG) diluted 1:2000 with 1% (weight/vol) bovine serum albumin/PBS, for 2 hours at room temperature. Cover slips were then washed three times for 5 min each with PBS, and stained with ethidium bromide (diluted 1:10,000 in PBS; Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 to 4 min to visualize nuclei. A final series of three PBS washes of 5 min each was then performed, after which the cover slips were dried and mounted on 1.5 μl of Bio-Rad FluoroGuard™ Anti-fade Reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and cover slip edges sealed with nail polish.
For cells cultured on EHS gel, the filter was inverted and the membrane cut into six to eight segments using a razor. Segments were placed in 35 mm sterile Petri dishes and gently washed three times for 5 min each with PBS. The same procedure was followed for indirect immunocytochemistry, as previously described.
Cells were viewed using a Leica TCS SP2 AOBS laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, New South Wales, Australia), using oil immersion and a 40× or 100× objective. Images were captured by the photomultiplier tube using the Leica TCS SP2 laser, and viewed on a workstation using Leica microsystems TCS SP2 software. Images were presented using Microsoft PowerPoint software.
CAFs demonstrate greater expression of myofibroblastic markers than NMFs
The phenotypes of human primary NMFs, obtained from reduction mammoplasty tissue, and human primary mammary CAFs, obtained from minced mammary tumour biopsy tissue, were determined by analysis of protein markers associated with the myofibroblast phenotype.
Fibroblasts cause changes in key myoepithelial- and luminal epithelial-specific protein expression by PMC42-LA organoids
PMC42-LA cells cultured on ECM gel coated filters to form organoids with fibroblasts beneath the filter or fibroblast-conditioned medium were analyzed for myoepithelial-specific and luminal epithelial-specific protein markers.
In the absence of fibroblasts or their conditioned medium, α-SMA was not expressed by PMC42-LA organoids (Figure 2b). When cultured with NMFs beneath the filter, PMC42-LA organoids exhibited a significant 2.5 (± 1.16)-fold increase in α-SMA (P < 0.01), similar to that seen in PMC42-LA cultures with CAFs beneath the filter (fold increase: 2.7 ± 0.42, P < 0.01; Figure 2b, lanes 1 and 2, respectively). Compared with control, conditioned medium from NMFs caused a significant 6.7 (± 2.76)-fold increase in α-SMA expression (P < 0.01) in PMC42-LA cells, which was similar to the significant 7.4 (± 1.20)-fold increase seen in PMC42-LA cells (P < 0.001) cultured in CAF-conditioned medium (Figure 2b, lanes 3 and 4, respectively). Immunocytochemistry revealed that α-SMA-expressing cells were organized similarly within organoids in all fibroblast treatment conditions (Figure 2b, lanes 1 to 4).
Cytokeratin 14 was not expressed by PMC42-LA organoids in the absence of fibroblasts/conditioned medium (Figure 2c). However, expression of cytokeratin 14 was induced significantly by the presence of either NMFs (fold increase: 11.5 ± 9.1, P < 0.01) or CAFs (fold increase: 12.3 ± 9.3, P < 0.01) beneath the filter (Figure 2c, lanes 1 and 2, respectively). Fibroblast-conditioned medium induced expression of cytokeratin 14 similarly, with a significant 10.9 (± 8.8)-fold increase by PMC42-LA in NMF-conditioned medium (P < 0.01), and a 14.4 (± 10.2)-fold increase by cells in CAF-conditioned medium (P < 0.01; Figure 2c, lanes 3 and 4, respectively). Immunocytochemistry confirmed no obvious changes in the organization of cytokeratin 14-expressing cells within organoids in all fibroblast treatment conditions (Figure 2c, lanes 1 to 4).
Fibroblasts induce upregulation of vimentin and a change in the orientation of vimentin-positive cells in PMC42-LA organoids
Compared with control, vimentin expression was significantly increased in cells cultured with NMFs beneath the filter (fold increase: 3.9 ± 2.50, P < 0.001) and in cells with CAFs beneath the filter (fold increase: 4.4 ± 2.70, P < 0.001; Figure 2d, lanes 1 and 2, respectively). In the presence of NMF-conditioned medium, vimentin expression was significantly upregulated by 3.2 (± 1.30)-fold (P < 0.001), which was similar to the 3.3 (± 1.80)-fold (P < 0.001) increase by cells in CAF-conditioned medium (Figure 2d, lanes 3 and 4, respectively) compared with control. In control PMC42-LA organoids, vimentin-positive cells were distributed throughout the organoids with no apparent pattern in organization (Figure 2d, control). However, when cells were cultured with NMFs beneath the filter, vimentin-positive cells became more organized, and were only visible on the outer layer of organoids (Figure 2d, lane 1). This was also the case when cells were cultured with CAFs beneath the filter (Figure 2d, lane 2) and in NMF-conditioned medium (Figure 2d, lane 3). Surprisingly, PMC42-LA cells cultured in CAF-conditioned medium appeared to form organoids with the same organization as control cells, with vimentin-positive cells being dispersed throughout organoids (Figure 2d, lane 4).
Fibroblasts induce an intracellular change in localisation of E-cadherin in PMC42-LA cells away from the cell junctions
CAF-conditioned medium causes disruption of the cadherin-catenin complex in PMC42-LA cells
In the absence of fibroblast-conditioned media, E-cadherin and β-catenin colocalized to the cell junctions in PMC42-LA monolayer cells (yellow in Figure 3b part A), with sparse areas of independent localization (red/green). When PMC42-LA cells were cultured in NMF-conditioned medium, this colocalization was still apparent (yellow in Figure 3b part B), with some areas of non-colocalization (green/red). However, in the presence of CAF-conditioned medium, β-catenin exhibited a predominantly cytoplasmic label, with some nuclear label (red in Figure 3b part C), with E-cadherin also localised to the cytoplasm (green/yellow in Figure 3b part C). This was performed on PMC42-LA monolayer cultures to allow one to visualize clearly the localization of these two proteins within individual cells.
CAFs may stimulate more rapid proliferation of PMC42-LA cells than NMFs
Using total cell counts at 24 hours, 3 days and 5 days, some differences in rates of proliferation of PMC42-LA cells in relation to fibroblast-conditioned medium were seen (data not shown). No significant difference was detected at 24 hours, but at 3 days numbers of PMC42-LA cells in CAF-conditioned medium were considerably greater than numbers of PMC42-LA cells cultured in NMF-conditioned medium. At 5 days, this difference was still evident although not significant. This pattern was also seen in three-dimensional culture, with no difference in PMC42-LA proliferation in NMF-conditioned media or CAF-conditioned media at 24 hours; considerably higher cell numbers in CAF-conditioned media at 3 days; and slightly higher, but not significant, proliferation of PMC42-LA in CAF-conditioned medium at 5 days compared with NMF-conditioned medium (data not shown).
Effects of CAFs and NMFs on cell viability and apoptosis of PMC42-LA cells do not differ
CAF-conditioned medium enhances the migratory ability of PMC42-LA cells
Concentration of NMF-conditioned media enhances the migratory ability of PMC42-LA
CAF-conditioned medium causes budding and detachment of single cells from PMC42-LA organoids in three-dimensional culture
In our study we used a human mammary carcinoma cell line with stem cell-like properties  in vitro to illustrate the differential effects of NMFs and CAFs on EMT. Darcy and coworkers  used a similar transwell co-culture system to show that mammary fibroblasts beneath the filter insert were able to stimulate mammary epithelial cell growth and induce alveolar morphogenesis. A similar study conducted by Gache and colleagues  also demonstrated that the effect of fibroblasts on co-cultured epithelial cells is via paracrine exchange mechanisms. We extended this approach to compare the effects of fibroblasts derived from malignant mammary tissue (CAFs) with those derived from normal mammary tissue (NMFs). To our knowledge, this is a novel report of selective and direct effects of CAFs on EMT parameters.
NMFs and CAFs can be distinguished on the basis of their differential maker expression. FAP is a 93 kDa cell surface antigen of reactive tumour stromal fibroblasts that is not detected by immunocytochemistry in normal fibroblasts [30–33]. Expression of FAP was seen in both NMFs and CAFs but at a higher level (approximately twofold) in CAFs. To date, there have been no quantitative data published on FAP expression, only studies indicating that resting fibroblasts in normal tissue lack detectable FAP expression by immunocytochemistry [32, 33]. This suggests that a low FAP level, undetectable by immunocytochemistry, may be expressed by NMFs and detectable only by Western blot analysis. We detected higher levels of α-SMA in CAFs than in NMFs, confirming the myofibroblastic nature of CAFs. The NMFs used in this study exhibit some α-SMA expression, despite being derived from normal human mammary tissue and, expectedly, the CAFs displayed higher expression (2.7-fold) of this protein. It has been shown that 10% to 80% of cultured human mammary stromal cells synthesize α-SMA after 4 to 11 days in culture, suggesting that elements of smooth muscle differentiation may arise during cell culture of non-smooth-muscle stromal cells that have been taken directly from human breast tissue . Therefore the expression of some α-SMA by NMFs may be an artefact of culture conditions and is not entirely unexpected.
The most significant observation of this study was the differential effects of NMFs and CAFs on the migration of PMC42-LA cells, directly implicating a role for CAFs in inducing cell motility. Following wound infliction in two-dimensional culture, CAF-conditioned medium caused PMC42-LA cells to migrate and upregulate vimentin at the site of the wound at a quicker rate than was seen in control cells or in cells cultured in medium conditioned by NMFs. Wounded control PMC42-LA cells were accompanied by very little vimentin upregulation and incomplete wound closure over 48 hours, similar to PMC42-LA cells cultured in NMF-conditioned medium. The monolayer of control and NMF-conditioned medium cultures remained intact, with no detached cells or changes in cell morphology. In contrast, within 24 hours, PMC42-LA cells cultured in CAF-conditioned medium exhibited a dramatic upregulation of vimentin, with small numbers of detached 'stray' cells. In CAF-conditioned medium, at 24 hours, stray PMC42-LA cells and cells surrounding the wound possessed a spindle-shaped morphology, with some cells exhibiting vimentin-rich protrusions. By 48 hours, almost all PMC42-LA wounds in CAF-conditioned medium were completely closed and could only be visualized by reference to areas of intense vimentin staining and cells with an elongated morphology, stretching in the direction of wound closure. The addition of CAF-conditioned medium to three-dimensional PMC42-LA organoid cultures or below the filters caused 'budding' on some organoids, and the appearance of stray cells and clusters of stray cells surrounding the organoids, which were not seen in control cultures.
These findings, combined with the apparent loss in cell-cell adhesion and upregulation of vimentin, suggest that PMC42-LA are more susceptible to EMT in the presence of CAFs. A slight increase in PMC42-LA migration was noted in NMF-conditioned media cultures compared with control, although to a lesser extent than in CAF-conditioned media, indicating that a factor, or factors, secreted by NMFs may be more highly secreted by CAFs. This was confirmed by experiments evaluating the effect of increasing the concentration of NMF-conditioned medium; specifically, we report a concentration-dependant response by PMC42-LA, with more extensive scratch wound closure in more concentrated NMF-conditioned media.
A key finding in our study was the disruptive effect of CAF-conditioned media on cell-cell junctions. Exposure of PMC42-LA organoids to either NMFs or CAFs caused a change in localization of E-cadherin, a cell-cell adhesion molecule that is normally located at cell junctions. E-cadherin has been shown to be an invasion suppressor in cell culture systems [35–37], and partial or complete loss of E-cadherin expression correlates with poor prognosis in breast cancer patients . E-cadherin was detected mainly in the cytoplasm of PMC42-LA cells after exposure to either type of fibroblast or fibroblast-conditioned medium, and this cytoplasmic localization was more pronounced in PMC42-LA cells cultured in the presence of CAFs than in the presence of NMFs. An abnormal cytoplasmic distribution of E-cadherin has been reported in 17% of invasive lobular breast tumours, with variable expression on cell membranes . The in vitro movement of E-cadherin from cell junctions to the cytoplasm has been reported as a consequence of EMT in vitro . To our knowledge, these data provide the first evidence that myofibroblasts can induce an EMT in mammary carcinoma cells.
The loss of cellular junctional integrity was confirmed by observations that CAF-conditioned medium induced mis-localization of β-catenin to cytoplasm and nuclear regions in PMC42-LA cells. β-Catenin is an essential component of junctional complexes, linking E-cadherin to the actin filaments . Mouse studies of colorectal cancer have described increased cytoplasmic expression and nuclear localization of β-catenin in chemically induced tumours . E-cadherin has also been shown to recruit β-catenin to the cell membrane and prevent its nuclear localization in SW480 colon carcinoma cells . Plasma membrane-associated staining of E-cadherin and β-catenin has reportedly been absent in invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast . Accumulation of β-catenin in the cytoplasm and nucleus has been hypothesized to promote malignant transformation and progression in breast cancer . Thus the CAF-conditioned medium induced mis-localization of β-catenin seen in our study indicates a substantial role for CAFs in EMT and potentially a role in cancer progression.
Further evidence of an EMT is the upregulation of vimentin by PMC42-LA cells cultured in CAF-conditioned medium. Induction of vimentin is a hallmark of EMT, with almost universal upregulation of this protein . Vimentin is selectively expressed in invasive human breast cancer cell lines , reflecting the end-stage of tumour de-differentiation [47, 48]. Vimentin is a marker for the mesenchymal phenotype, and upregulation of vimentin may be indicative of EMT [49–51]. Increased expression of vimentin has previously been reported in PMC42-LA cells in response to EGF-induced EMT . Significantly, although the presence of NMFs resulted in the appearance of vimentin-positive cells layered on the outside of organoids, in control organoids and cells cultured in CAF-conditioned medium vimentin-positive cells were localized throughout the organoids.
We postulate that NMFs secrete factors that lead to cellular organization or, conversely, that soluble secreted factors from CAFs disturb cell disorganization. It is possible that that this disorganization was not seen in PMC42-LA cells cultured with CAFs beneath the filter because of insufficient concentrations of these factor(s) being produced by the small number of fibroblasts placed below the filter. A similar loss of polarity and disruption of acinar structures has been reported in three-dimensional HC11 mouse mammary epithelial cell culture, associated with FGF receptor 1 activation. This cellular disorganization was also accompanied by a gain of invasive properties and increased vimentin expression . A hallmark of breast cancer is a loss of polarity and apico-basal organization of epithelial cells, and our results indicate that fibroblasts may have the capacity to alter the organization of epithelial cells within a three-dimensional structure.
Vimentin is not only a marker of EMT but also a marker specific to myoepithelial cells, and therefore upregulation in this protein alone does not suggest EMT. The possibility that CAF-conditioned medium induces a myoepithelial phenotype rather than an EMT can be excluded by the knowledge that both NMFs and CAFs induce these myoepithelial markers, but only CAFs are able to induce migration of PMC42-LA. In addition to an upregulation of vimentin, it is also the separation of cells from the epithelial 'sheets' and a morphologic change to spindle cells that characterises an EMT , all of which we report here. In vitro studies have shown that soluble factors such as EGF, motility factors and scatter factors promote migratory and locomotive abilities in epithelial cells, accompanied by changes in cell morphology [54–59], thereby promoting an EMT. However, although these factors induce an EMT in vitro, no specific in vivo counterparts for these growth factors in cancer progression have been found. Our study demonstrates a novel model that mimics the in vivo mammary gland, whereby myofibroblasts, through soluble factors, induce breast epithelial cells to undergo an EMT.
In contrast to other studies demonstrating a substantial effect of fibroblasts [60–66] and fibroblast-conditioned medium  in stimulating proliferation of cells through paracrine mechanisms , in our studies we report only a slight increase in proliferation of PMC42-LA in CAF-conditioned medium compared with NMF-conditioned medium. Over a 5-day period, we report no significant difference in the effect of CAFs compared with NMFs on cell viability or programmed cell death. Other studies have also reported that conditioned medium obtained from fibroblasts derived from both malignant and benign breast tumours had growth stimulatory effects on breast cancer cells, whereas conditioned medium from normal fibroblasts inhibited growth . The extent of proliferation induced may depend upon the source of the fibroblasts, with tumour fibroblasts producing a greater mitogenic response than fibroblasts derived from normal breast tissue . In vitro studies using mammary fibroblasts  and in vivo mouse studies using CAFs and NMFs  indicate that the effect of fibroblasts on tumour cells depends upon the type and proportion of inoculated cells. Our study indicates that the key effects of CAFs are on motility, cell organization and EMT marker expression, rather than proliferation.
To ascertain how NMFs and CAFs differentially affect breast epithelial cells, we analyzed PMC42-LA cultured in their conditioned medium for a range of markers. Expression of the myoepithelial marker proteins α-SMA and cytokeratin 14 were significantly upregulated by PMC42-LA organoids upon exposure to both fibroblast types and their respective conditioned medium. Although unrelated to a cancer or EMT phenotype, we previously demonstrated upregulation in myoepithelial-specific proteins by PMC42-LA cells cultured in three dimensions with primary mammary fibroblasts . In the present study, no significant difference in expression levels of myoepithelial proteins was caused by exposure to the different fibroblasts, indicating that both CAFs and NMFs can enrich the myoepithelial population in PMC42-LA culture. A significantly greater increase in α-SMA was seen in cells cultured in either type of fibroblast-conditioned medium, as compared with those with fibroblasts beneath the filter. This may be attributed to the possibility that a greater concentration of fibroblast-secreted soluble factors may be present in fibroblast-conditioned medium, as compared with the less concentrated factors that would be secreted from the small number of fibroblasts beneath the filter.
Arising from the study is the question of the nature of the soluble factors that mediate the differential effects of CAFs and NMFs on mammary epithelial cells. van Roozendaal and coworkers  reported that breast fibroblast-conditioned medium contains IGF, which was responsible for MCF-7 proliferation. However, when NMFs and CAFs were compared in terms of IGF-II expression by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction, no significant difference was seen [69, 71]. Neutralizing antibodies specific to growth factors demonstrated that the growth-stimulatory activity of fibroblasts was not inhibited by anti-IGF-II, anti-EGF, anti-IGF, or anti-TGF-α . Because fibroblasts produce many other growth factors, such as various factors from the hepatocyte growth factor, and basic FGF and IGF families, there are many possibilities and combinations of growth factors that may be responsible for the effect of fibroblasts. Treatments of PMC42-LA cells with IGF-I (10 ng/ml) and IGF-II (10 ng/ml), tumour necrosis factor-α (40 ng/ml), vascular endothelial growth factor (10 ng/ml) and TGF-β (10 ng/ml) failed to replicate the upregulation of vimentin and mis-localization of E-cadherin (data not shown) we found with CAF-conditioned media exposure. Further analysis of the fibroblast-conditioned media is necessary to identify the factors involved; furthermore, the reciprocal effect of cancer cells on the production of growth factors by fibroblasts may need to be taken into account.
Our study demonstrates a direct role for CAFs in breast cancer progression through the induction of an EMT. Relative to NMFs, CAFs had increased propensity to increase the migratory ability of PMC42-LA cells, commensurate with the characteristics of EMT, including the mis-localization of E-cadherin and translocation of β-catenin, and the upregulation of vimentin. Our study indicates that the factor or factors responsible are secreted by CAFs at a higher level than by NMFs. Elucidation of the mechanism of the cellular interaction between CAFs and mammary epithelial cells will contribute to preventative treatments of breast carcinoma metastasis that act by targeting these factors directly.
Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium
epidermal growth factor
fibroblast activation protein
foetal bovine serum
fibroblast growth factor
insulin-like growth factor
normal mammary fibroblast
smooth muscle actin
transforming growth factor.
We thank Marc Lafleur and Neeracha Ruangpanit for kindly providing the primary fibroblast lines. We also thank the Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research (Heidelberg, Australia) for kindly donating the muF19 antibody.
- Noel A, Foidart JM: The role of stroma in breast carcinoma growth in vivo. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998, 3: 215-225. 10.1023/A:1018703208453.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dvorak HF: Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Engl J Med. 1986, 315: 1650-1659.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gache C, Berthois Y, Martin PM, Saez S: Positive regulation of normal and tumoral mammary epithelial cell proliferation by fibroblasts in coculture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1998, 34: 347-351.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barcellos-Hoff MH, Medina D: New highlights on stroma-epithelial interactions in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: 33-36. 10.1186/bcr972.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Farber E: The multistep nature of cancer development. Cancer Res. 1984, 44: 4217-4223.Google Scholar
- Barcellos-Hoff MH: The potential influence of radiation-induced microenvironments in neoplastic progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998, 3: 165-175. 10.1023/A:1018794806635.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bissell MJ, Radisky D: Putting tumours in context. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001, 1: 46-54. 10.1038/35094059.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tlsty TD: Cell-adhesion-dependent influences on genomic instability and carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998, 10: 647-653. 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80041-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barcellos-Hoff MH, Ravani SA: Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 1254-1260.Google Scholar
- Bhowmick NA, Neilson EG, Moses HL: Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression. Nature. 2004, 432: 332-337. 10.1038/nature03096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olumi AF, Grossfeld GD, Hayward SW, Carroll PR, Tlsty TD, Cunha GR: Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts direct tumor progression of initiated human prostatic epithelium. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 5002-5011.Google Scholar
- Hayward SW, Wang Y, Cao M, Hom YK, Zhang B, Grossfeld GD, Sudilovsky D, Cunha GR: Malignant transformation in a nontumorigenic human prostatic epithelial cell line. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 8135-8142.Google Scholar
- Lazard D, Sastre X, Frid MG, Glukhova MA, Thiery JP, Koteliansky VE: Expression of smooth muscle-specific proteins in myoepithelium and stromal myofibroblasts of normal and malignant human breast tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 999-1003. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majne G: Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia. 1971, 27: 549-550. 10.1007/BF02147594.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Wever O, Mareel M: Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion. J Pathol. 2003, 200: 429-447. 10.1002/path.1398.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heffelfinger SC, Miller MA, Yassin R, Gear R: Angiogenic growth factors in preinvasive breast disease. Clin Cancer Res. 1999, 5: 2867-2876.Google Scholar
- Cullen KJ, Kaup SS, Rasmussen AA: Interactions Between Stroma and Epithelium in breast cancer. 1999, Totowa, NJ: Humana PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto E, Yoshida T, Kawarada Y, Sakakura T: Expression of fibronectin isoforms in human breast tissue: production of extra domain A+/extra domain B+ by cancer cells and extra domain A+ by stromal cells. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999, 90: 320-325.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barsky SH, Rao CN, Grotendorst GR, Liotta LA: Increased content of type V collagen in desmoplasia of human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 1982, 108: 276-283.Google Scholar
- Deak SB, Glaug MR, Pierce RA, Bancila E, Amenta P, Mackenzie JW, Greco RS, Boyd CD: Desmoplasia in benign and malignant breast disease is characterized by alterations in level of mRNAs coding for types I and III procollagen. Matrix. 1991, 11: 252-258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brummer O, Athar S, Riethdorf L, Loning T, Herbst H: Matrix-metalloproteinases 1, 2, and 3 and their tissue inhibitors 1 and 2 in benign and malignant breast lesions: an in situ hybridization study. Virchows Arch. 1999, 435: 566-573. 10.1007/s004280050442.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen BS, Rank F, Lopez JM, Balbin M, Vizoso F, Lund LR, Dano K, Lopez-Otin C: Collagenase-3 expression in breast myofibroblasts as a molecular marker of transition of ductal carcinoma in situ lesions to invasive ductal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 7091-7100.Google Scholar
- Whitehead RH, Bertoncello I, Webber LM, Pedersen JS: A new human breast carcinoma cell line (PMC42) with stem cell characteristics. I. Morphologic characterization. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983, 70: 649-661.Google Scholar
- Whitehead RH, Monaghan P, Webber LM, Bertoncello I, Vitali AA: A new human breast carcinoma cell line (PMC42) with stem cell characteristics. II. Characterization of cells growing as organoids. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983, 71: 1193-1203.Google Scholar
- Ackland ML, Michalczyk A, Whitehead RH: PMC42, a novel model for the differentiated human breast. Exp Cell Res. 2001, 263: 14-22. 10.1006/excr.2000.5106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ackland ML, Newgreen DF, Fridman M, Waltham MC, Arvanitis A, Minichiello J, Price JT, Thompson EW: Epidermal growth factor-induced epithelio-mesenchymal transition in human breast carcinoma cells. Lab Invest. 2003, 83: 435-438. 10.1038/labinvest.3780585.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lebret SC, Newgreen DF, Waltham MC, Price JT, Thompson EW, Ackland ML: Myoepithelial molecular markers in human breast carcinoma PMC42-LA cells are induced by extracellular matrix and stromal cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2006, 42: 298-307. 10.1079/IVP2006765.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead RH, Quirck SJ, Vitali AA, Funder JW, Sutherland RL, Murphy LC: A new human breast carcinoma cell line (PMC42) with stem cell characteristics. III. Hormone receptor status and responsiveness. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984, 73: 643-648.Google Scholar
- Darcy KM, Zangani D, Shea-Eaton W, Shoemaker SF, Lee PP, Mead LH, Mudipalli A, Megan R, Ip MM: Mammary fibroblasts stimulate growth, alveolar morphogenesis, and functional differentiation of normal rat mammary epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2000, 36: 578-592. 10.1290/1071-2690(2000)036<0578:MFSGAM>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Welt S, Divgi CR, Scott AM, Garin-Chesa P, Finn RD, Graham M, Carswell EA, Cohen A, Larson SM, Old LJ, et al: Antibody targeting in metastatic colon cancer: a phase I study of monoclonal antibody F19 against a cell-surface protein of reactive tumor stromal fibroblasts. J Clin Oncol. 1994, 12: 1193-1203.Google Scholar
- Scanlan MJ, Raj BK, Calvo B, Garin-Chesa P, Sanz-Moncasi MP, Healey JH, Old LJ, Rettig WJ: Molecular cloning of fibroblast activation protein alpha, a member of the serine protease family selectively expressed in stromal fibroblasts of epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 5657-5661. 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5657.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rettig WJ, Garin-Chesa P, Beresford HR, Oettgen HF, Melamed MR, Old LJ: Cell-surface glycoproteins of human sarcomas: differential expression in normal and malignant tissues and cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 3110-3114. 10.1073/pnas.85.9.3110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Garin-Chesa P, Old LJ, Rettig WJ: Cell surface glycoprotein of reactive stromal fibroblasts as a potential antibody target in human epithelial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990, 87: 7235-7239. 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ronnov-Jessen L, van Deurs B, Celis JE, Petersen OW: Smooth muscle differentiation in cultured human breast gland stromal cells. Lab Invest. 1990, 63: 532-543.Google Scholar
- Chen H, Paradies NE, Fedor-Chaiken M, Brackenbury R: E-cadherin mediates adhesion and suppresses cell motility via distinct mechanisms. J Cell Sci. 1997, 110: 345-356.Google Scholar
- Frixen UH, Behrens J, Sachs M, Eberle G, Voss B, Warda A, Lochner D, Birchmeier W: E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion prevents invasiveness of human carcinoma cells. J Cell Biol. 1991, 113: 173-185. 10.1083/jcb.113.1.173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Luo J, Lubaroff DM, Hendrix MJ: Suppression of prostate cancer invasive potential and matrix metalloproteinase activity by E-cadherin transfection. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 3552-3556.Google Scholar
- Berx G, Van Roy F: The E-cadherin/catenin complex: an important gatekeeper in breast cancer tumorigenesis and malignant progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3: 289-293. 10.1186/bcr309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rasbridge SA, Gillett CE, Sampson SA, Walsh FS, Millis RR: Epithelial (E-) and placental (P-) cadherin cell adhesion molecule expression in breast carcinoma. J Pathol. 1993, 169: 245-250. 10.1002/path.1711690211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bellovin DI, Bates RC, Muzikansky A, Rimm DL, Mercurio AM: Altered localization of p120 catenin during epithelial to mesenchymal transition of colon carcinoma is prognostic for aggressive disease. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 10938-10945. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1947.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuroda H, Tamaru J, Takeuchi I, Ohnisi K, Sakamoto G, Adachi A, Kaneko K, Itoyama S: Expression of E-cadherin, alpha-catenin, and beta-catenin in tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast. Virchows Arch. 2006, 448: 500-505. 10.1007/s00428-005-0096-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tucker E, Buda A, Janghra B, Cpoad J, Moorghan M, Havler M, Dettmar P, Pignatelli M: Abnormalities of the cadherin-catenin complex in chemically-induced colo-rectal carcinogenesis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003, 62: 229-236. 10.1079/PNS2003217.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orsulic S, Huber O, Aberle H, Arnold S, Kemler R: E-cadherin binding prevents beta-catenin nuclear localization and beta-catenin/LEF-1-mediated transactivation. J Cell Sci. 1999, 112: 1237-1245.Google Scholar
- Yang JF, Chen SL, Liu ZH, Zhang Y: Correlation among expression of E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and cyclin D1 in breast cancers. Ai Zheng. 2004, 23: 799-802.Google Scholar
- Thiery JP: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumor progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 442-454. 10.1038/nrc822.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson EW, Paik S, Brunner N, Sommers CL, Zugmaier G, Clarke R, Shima TB, Torri J, Donahue S, Lippman ME, et al: Association of increased basement membrane invasiveness with absence of estrogen receptor and expression of vimentin in human breast cancer cell lines. J Cell Physiol. 1992, 150: 534-544. 10.1002/jcp.1041500314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sommers CL, Heckford SE, Skerker JM, Worland P, Torri JA, Thompson EW, Byers SW, Gelmann EP: Loss of epithelial markers and acquisition of vimentin expression in adriamycin- and vinblastine-resistant human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 1992, 52: 5190-5197.Google Scholar
- Sommers CL, Byers SW, Thompson EW, Torri JA, Gelmann EP: Differentiation state and invasiveness of human breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1994, 31: 325-335. 10.1007/BF00666165.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Osborn M, Debus E, Weber K: Monoclonal antibodies specific for vimentin. Eur J Cell Biol. 1984, 34: 137-143.Google Scholar
- Fuchs E, Weber K: Intermediate filaments: structure, dynamics, function, and disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994, 63: 345-382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernal SD, Stahel RA: Cytoskeleton-associated proteins: their role as cellular integrators in the neoplastic process. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1985, 3: 191-204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xian W, Schwertfeger KL, Vargo-Gogola T, Rosen JM: Pleiotropic effects of FGFR1 on cell proliferation, survival, and migration in a 3D mammary epithelial cell model. J Cell Biol. 2005, 171: 663-673. 10.1083/jcb.200505098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petersen OW, Lind Nielsen H, Gudjonsson T, Villadsen R, Ronnov-Jessen L, Bissell MJ: The plasticity of human breast carcinoma cells is more than epithelial to mesenchymal conversion. Breast Cancer Res. 2001, 3: 213-217. 10.1186/bcr298.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stracke ML, Krutzsch HC, Unsworth EJ, Arestad A, Cioce V, Schiffmann E, Liotta LA: Identification, purification, and partial sequence analysis of autotaxin, a novel motility-stimulating protein. J Biol Chem. 1992, 267: 2524-2529.Google Scholar
- Liotta LA, Mandler R, Murano G, Katz DA, Gordon RK, Chiang PK, Schiffmann E: Tumor cell autocrine motility factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986, 83: 3302-3306. 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Bhargava MM, Joseph A, Jin L, Rosen EM, Goldberg ID: Effect of hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor and other growth factors on motility and morphology of non-tumorigenic and tumor cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1994, 30A: 105-110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilles C, Thompson EW: The epithelial to mesenchymal transition and metastatic progression in carcinoma. Breast J. 1996, 2: 83-96. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.1996.tb00076.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bellusci S, Moens G, Gaudino G, Comoglio P, Nakamura T, Thiery JP, Jouanneau J: Creation of an hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor autocrine loop in carcinoma cells induces invasive properties associated with increased tumorigenicity. Oncogene. 1994, 9: 1091-1099.Google Scholar
- Bellusci S, Moens G, Thiery JP, Jouanneau J: A scatter factor-like factor is produced by a metastatic variant of a rat bladder carcinoma cell line. J Cell Sci. 1994, 107: 1277-1287.Google Scholar
- Mukaida H, Hirabayashi N, Hirai T, Iwata T, Saeki S, Toge T: Significance of freshly cultured fibroblasts from different tissues in promoting cancer cell growth. Int J Cancer. 1991, 48: 423-427. 10.1002/ijc.2910480320.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brouty-Boye D, Mainguene C, Magnien V, Israel L, Beaupain R: Fibroblast-mediated differentiation in human breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7) grown as nodules in vitro. Int J Cancer. 1994, 56: 731-735. 10.1002/ijc.2910560520.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adam L, Crepin M, Lelong JC, Spanakis E, Israel L: Selective interactions between mammary epithelial cells and fibroblasts in co-culture. Int J Cancer. 1994, 59: 262-268. 10.1002/ijc.2910590219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hofland LJ, van der Burg B, van Eijck CH, Sprij DM, van Koetsveld PM, Lamberts SW: Role of tumor-derived fibroblasts in the growth of primary cultures of human breast-cancer cells: effects of epidermal growth factor and the somatostatin analogue octreotide. Int J Cancer. 1995, 60: 93-99. 10.1002/ijc.2910600114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lefebvre MF, Guillot C, Crepin M, Saez S: Influence of tumor derived fibroblasts and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on growth of breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995, 33: 189-197. 10.1007/BF00665943.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Orr DJA, Ryan MC, Horgan K: Demonstration of a positive feedback loop of paracrine growth stimulation in a new co-culture model of breast cancer. Breast. 1993, 2: 138-143. 10.1016/0960-9776(93)90056-L.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu J, Bagheri-Yarmand R, Xia Y, Crepin M: Modulations of breast fibroblast and carcinoma cell interactions by a dextran derivative (CMDB7). Anticancer Res. 1997, 17: 253-258.Google Scholar
- Enami J, Enami S, Koga M: Growth of normal and neoplastic mouse mammary epithelial cells in primary culture: stimulation by conditioned medium from mouse mammary fibroblasts. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1983, 74: 845-853.Google Scholar
- Adams EF, Newton CJ, Braunsberg H, Shaikh N, Ghilchik M, James VH: Effects of human breast fibroblasts on growth and 17 beta-estradiol dehydrogenase activity of MCF-7 cells in culture. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1988, 11: 165-172. 10.1007/BF01805840.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van Roozendaal KE, Klijn JG, van Ooijen B, Claassen C, Eggermont AM, Henzen-Logmans SC, Foekens JA: Differential regulation of breast tumor cell proliferation by stromal fibroblasts of various breast tissue sources. Int J Cancer. 1996, 65: 120-125. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960103)65:1<120::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-J.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brouty-Boye D, Raux H: Differential influence of stromal fibroblasts from different breast tissues on human breast tumour cell growth in nude mice. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13: 1087-1090.Google Scholar
- Sadlonova A, Novak Z, Johnson MR, Bowe DB, Gault SR, Page GP, Thottassery JV, Welch DR, Frost AR: Breast fibroblasts modulate epithelial cell proliferation in three-dimensional in vitro co-culture. Breast Cancer Res. 2005, 7: R46-R59. 10.1186/bcr949.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yashiro M, Ikeda K, Tendo M, Ishikawa T, Hirakawa K: Effect of organ-specific fibroblasts on proliferation and differentiation of breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005, 90: 307-313. 10.1007/s10549-004-5364-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.